DIRTY! Carney’s Finance Minister SNUCK $90B Alto Rail Into Budget — Then RECUSES 2 Weeks Later!?
完整文本记录
Emails were sent to all of Pierre
Poilievre's shadow cabinet from his
office, basically asking them to justify
their existence. Got some stuff going on
here today. Welcome back to Moos and
Loose. My name is David. Today, we've
got Pierre Poilievre and the
Conservatives rolling out new ads
testing the new message here after going
on Diary of a CEO and Joe Rogan, etc. As
well as going down to America, meeting
with business leaders. We've got the
by-elections coming up. Donald Trump
just pulled the boogeyman card from the
Liberals and Mark Carney and no more
51st state talk. As long as that stands,
this is really turning things up for the
by-elections week. Let's jump into this.
Starting this episode off some pretty
ugly pulling data, but it's time to
start looking at this again. So, we've
got the Liberals at 46% on this Nanos
poll and 31% for the Conservatives, NDP
at 13. So, plus seven. We're seeing the
Avi Lewis effect kicking in here. This
sample size only 1,000 people, so not
very big sample size. And how Nick Nanos
does his, he rolls in 250 people, new
people into his polls and then kicks out
the oldest 250 people. You're not seeing
a fresh batch of people right away.
There's a dumb comment here. Pierre's
only in it for Stornoway at this point.
You just can't reason with these kind of
people. Mark Carney is quite literally
rolling out his net zero agenda that
he's going to be making upwards over a
billion dollars from. We have Clay
Thompson saying that Poilievre's in it
for Stornoway. Unbelievably clueless.
Moving ahead, we've got the Food
Professor with this showing the past 12
months in Canada with food inflation.
We've got cucumbers 43%, whole chicken
42%, celery's plus 36%, coffee 25, beef
24, strawberries 22. All the way down
here. Everything is going up. You can't
get away from it. You can't change your
diet and eat the cheaper foods. There's
really nothing cheaper. Everything is
going up. So sad. I mean, even just
going for a run today, I saw some guys
hanging out the train station plugging
in some stuff. Clearly, they're
homeless, but they're not the typical
homeless people. They look like they're
people who work. They just have nowhere
to live. So, they're charging their
phone at a plug at the train station.
Actually, I've got a wild story of a guy
who I ran into told me that he has a
business that does over a million
dollars a year in construction materials
and he chooses to not run the business
because the taxes are so high in Canada.
He'd rather just work in the oil patch
for a couple weeks here and there versus
running his construction materials
company and get taxed out the wazoo 40
some odd percent. This is Canada where
people would rather not have a million
dollar business because taxes are so
high. And as you can see throughout this
episode, when you have food that's
really high and low prosperity,
Canadians start going down to America.
Before we get to that, we've got the
Terrebonne riding predictions here
coming from Shirley Teased. He's setting
it at 40% for the Liberals and 38% for
the Bloc, 14% for the Conservatives. We
really need the Conservatives to go vote
for the Bloc. If you're in the
Terrebonne riding and you're
Conservative, vote for the Bloc. We need
Carney to not have this seat. I think
the Liberals, they know this. They they
know that they need this one extra seat
just to make it a little bit more cushy
and that's why we're hearing this talks
of 10 more floor crossers cuz Carney
doesn't like the one seat majority. He
needs more. He doesn't want to do
another campaign cuz he's lazy. He just
wants to watch sports games and get
rich. So, they're desperately trying
their other plan here is getting 10 more
people. Now, likely they're not going to
get 10, but if they got two or three or
four or five, they'd have a more
comfortable majority government. So, we
really need to stick it to them right
here. So, if you're Conservative, vote
for the Bloc in this by-election. The
Liberals can't win this. Moving ahead,
we've got Ottawa Minister recuses
himself from Ottawa's high-speed rail
project. So, I brought this up in a
previous video. François-Philippe
Champagne's wife works as the vice
president of environment for Alto, a
crown corporation. It's directly
basically tied with Champagne here.
Direct conflict of interest. Raging
conflicts of interest. We got Michael
Barrett posting this. The finance
minister claims he recused himself, but
the ethics commissioner seems to have no
record of it. We need to get to the
bottom of this. What do you know? It's
more Liberal lies. We got Conservative
Denise Batters breaking this down. It
says, "Carney's Liberal finance minister
Champagne put this high-speed rail
initiative Alto into his own budget
implementation act. This bill C-15 only
passed two weeks ago. In making this
sneaky move, Champagne ensured that 90
billion boondoggle to be and his
personal connection would receive less
scrutiny and faster passage." Of course,
it did. These guys are so rotten to the
core. It's funny. Embraer is saying I
stepped away for a few hours, missed
another Liberal scandal. I mean, that's
how many there are here. A Liberal
feeding at the trough again, say it so.
This is what they have to say on the CBC
regarding this project. They bring on
this pundit to attack Pierre Poilievre
not wanting to support this 90 billion
dollar, which we know will go up to 150
or 200 billion dollar project that will
bankrupt Canada. Well, first of all,
it's quite ironic that he's now the king
of NIMBYism and has no concern
whatsoever about all these pipelines
that don't even have proponents behind
it and just expropriating land and doing
whatever you want. So, beyond that
hypocrisy,
um you know, there's these are thousands
of jobs and this is about building and
putting people to work.
>> You talk about hypocrisy. Champagne's
wife is literally one of the people
overseeing this expropriation, the land
grab for this Alto project that's going
to SNC-Lavalin renamed to Atkins Realis,
the former company charged with fraud
paying millions of dollars to get dirty
contracts. All tied to the Liberal
government. This is more corruption. The
only like G7 country, if not the only
OECD D country that doesn't have a
high-speed rail, right? This is about it
is fueling the economy.
>> That's a dumb reason to decide to have
high-speed rail or not. It's based on
population and whether the numbers work.
And that's why the private sector hasn't
done it because the numbers don't work.
Our population is not high enough. Our
country is so big. Looking at the
estimates, CD Howe projected we're going
to make around 15 billion dollars off
this high-speed rail. And if it cost us
90 billion dollars, that puts us in a
huge deficit. And we know full well this
won't be 90 billion. It'll be 150. It'll
be 200 billion. You know what the
high-speed rail in California is
currently projected at right now? So,
this talks about the high-speed rail
from San Francisco to Los Angeles. It
was originally in 2008, estimated price
was 33 billion. And today, it's now 126
billion. As in four times the price. So,
if the Liberals are saying 90 billion,
what's it going to cost us? 360 billion
dollars? 300 billion? 200? 250? It's not
going to be 90. Now, jumping back over
to X here, we've got Rick Perkins
commented on my post here talking about
François-Philippe Champagne's wife being
in Alto. And he says, "He introduced the
budget and spending estimates and voted
for them when the estimates allocated
597 million alone this year to Alto
directly where his partner is an