文本记录English

Keir Starmer to SACK Rachel Reeves? Markets 'TERRIFIED' as rumours swirl of Ed Miliband replacement

12m 10s2,703 字数399 segmentsEnglish

完整文本记录

0:03

Welcome to Lee Anderson's Real World.

0:05

I'm Lee Anderson, the Reform UK member

0:07

of Parliament for Ashefield. And tonight

0:09

on the show, he's back after a bit of a

0:12

stayaway period. Steven, what's been

0:14

happening? Well, grandfather duties.

0:16

>> Grandfather duties. He's our left in the

0:18

corner. That's Steven Pound. And we got

0:21

the very lovely Laura Brown. You're the

0:24

um commissioning editor at The

0:25

Spectator. That's right. Yes. This week

0:27

there are there are rumors Stephen that

0:29

Saki Stormer after a difficult period is

0:32

thinking of of shuffling a few of his

0:34

cabinet members and I think the number

0:37

10 a spokesman for number 10 did say

0:39

after PMQ was on Wednesday that they got

0:42

full confidence in Rachel Reeves the

0:44

chancellor now we all know what that

0:45

means is it time for her to go

0:48

>> well you're thinking about the old

0:49

football manager thing I've got complete

0:50

confidence in the manager you know he's

0:52

going to get the tint tac first thing in

0:53

the morning look there could be nothing

0:55

more utterly disastrous and unpatriotic

0:57

than sacking the chancellor of the

0:59

exchecker today because it would put the

1:01

bond markets into turmoil. The bond

1:03

markets love stability. We do not want

1:05

to go back to the insanity of the Liz

1:07

trust budget. So at the moment there

1:09

probably will be a reshuffle after May

1:10

the 7th and who knows what's going to

1:11

happen after May the 7th. But the

1:13

reality is that for the moment to sack

1:15

the chancer would be bad for Britain.

1:18

>> Is it bad for Britain Laura or good for

1:20

Britain?

1:20

>> Well it's difficult here because almost

1:22

all of the outcomes are quite bad for

1:24

Britain. Steven's right. The bond

1:25

markets are terrified of Rachel Reeves

1:27

going and that's because they think

1:29

they'll get Ed Miller band instead.

1:31

>> And if there's one thing that's worse

1:32

than Rachel Reeves, it's Ed Milliband. I

1:34

also think if we look at the like a

1:36

number of the really bad calls that

1:38

Rachel Reeves has made in in office, the

1:40

U-turn on the winter fuel payment, the

1:43

family farm tax and the sort of changes

1:44

around that, her attempt to cut welfare

1:46

and then completely giving up on it at

1:48

the last minute. These aren't all her

1:50

mistakes. her MPs won't back sensible

1:52

policy and Karma has forced her into

1:54

U-turns. So, we got to be careful here.

1:55

I'm not sure you can lay too much blame

1:57

at just her job.

1:58

>> The reality is, you know, one one U-turn

2:00

is some one one person's U-turn is

2:01

another person's listening and changing

2:03

them. When the facts change, you change

2:04

your mind. The winter fuel payments, I

2:06

have to say initially the idea of having

2:08

it for every single person, the king of

2:10

England gets a winter fuel payment was

2:11

bonkers. And so, what we've done is

2:13

we've come up with a better scheme. So,

2:15

it wasn't the old universal system of

2:16

winter fuel benefit. It's a targeted

2:18

one. What could possibly be wrong with

2:20

that?

2:20

>> Because it's more expensive than the old

2:21

system giving everyone to fuel payments.

2:23

>> Apart from that, what could possibly be

2:24

wrong with that? So, whose fault is it?

2:26

>> Well, Star's fault and a pretty

2:28

lackluster cabinet's fault, I would say.

2:30

>> Here's what most people don't realize.

2:32

Your personal data isn't just floating

2:34

around. It's being bought and sold every

2:37

single day by data brokers. That means

2:40

employers, strangers, scammers, and even

2:43

criminals can access it. And that's how

2:45

identity theft, fraud, and harassment

2:47

starts. Now, sure, you could try

2:50

removing it yourself, but it takes hours

2:52

of forms and emails, and even then, it

2:55

usually pops right back up. That's why

2:58

this video is brought to you by Incogn.

3:01

Incogners

3:02

on your behalf and demands your

3:04

information is deleted from their

3:06

databases, and they keep on doing it to

3:08

make sure it stays gone. and they've

3:11

just launched an unlimited plan with

3:13

custom removals. So, if your info

3:15

appears on some random website, you can

3:17

paste the link and their privacy team

3:19

will personally work to get it taken

3:21

down. It's simple. Click the link in the

3:24

description, create your account, give

3:26

permission, and they handle the rest.

3:28

Head to incogn.com/gbs.

3:33

And with the code GB news, you can get a

3:35

huge 60% off an annual plan. Click the

3:38

link in the description or scan the QR

3:40

code now. It works out at less than a

3:43

coffee a month. Is also totally

3:45

risk-free for 30 days. Take back control

3:48

of your personal data today within

3:51

Cogni. And a big thanks to them for

3:53

supporting the channel.

3:59

>> A lackluster cabinet Steven and Storm's

4:02

for. Is he a weak leader? Yeah, he he's

4:04

he's a strong leader in some ways, but

4:08

the the reality the reality is that he's

4:10

a strong leader and the fact the reality

4:11

is he's there for the duration. There is

4:13

no way that the Labour Party is going to

4:15

dump him. We've never ever dumped one of

4:17

our leaders. We don't do that. So, he's

4:19

there for the time being. If he does go,

4:20

it'll be because he wants to.

4:22

>> Well, make your mind up, Stephen. He

4:23

says he's not going to go and the next

4:25

breath he might go.

4:26

>> No, no. I'm I'm saying if if it would

4:29

have to be he himself simply waking up

4:30

one morning said, "I can't hack it

4:32

anymore." We have to remember we're used

4:34

to conservative rule and the tries

4:36

govern by register. It's very very easy

4:38

for them to get rid of their prime

4:39

ministers. It is more difficult for

4:41

Labor because the only mechanism for it

4:44

to happen requires a lot of MPs. I think

4:46

it's 80 in the current parliament to get

4:48

behind one candidate and we have all

4:49

seen the factions on the left. I mean

4:51

you'll have the Burnham ticket, the

4:53

streeting ticket, the Raina ticket, the

4:55

Miban ticket probably. That being said,

4:58

>> I think he's so bad they're going to do

5:00

it. I think they're going to get so

5:01

nervous that they will eventually unite

5:03

behind one figure.

5:04

>> But Lee, the the reality is that anybody

5:06

who thinks that they're going to

5:08

actually keep their seats by changing

5:09

the leader is delusional. We've been

5:11

there before. The tourists went through

5:13

four prime ministers in five how many

5:14

under 10 years. It simply doesn't work.

5:17

So the the reality is that who knows

5:19

what it's going to be like.

5:19

>> Have you ever known, Stephen, a more

5:22

unpopular prime minister in your

5:24

lifetime?

5:24

>> Damn right mate. I was I was there in

5:25

the 80s when we had Margaret Thatcher

5:27

was loathed. this by the country.

5:30

>> Genuine polling would say that he is the

5:32

most unpopular prime minister since the

5:33

Second World War. Like he is more

5:35

unpopular than Thatcher. Whatever you

5:37

think personally that the facts bear

5:39

that out. The the crater in his polling

5:41

numbers is pretty unprecedented. He most

5:43

people become unpopular after 5 years,

5:46

after 9 years. People tire of them.

5:48

>> He was negative polling in the first few

5:50

months after the election.

5:51

>> You got you got to work up to that level

5:52

of unpopularity. It's not easy. But I

5:54

mean Harold Wilson was incredibly

5:55

unpopular if you remember what it's like

5:57

in the mid60s but then he know he won

5:59

two elections. It it does happen. I I

6:01

think what is different here is that in

6:03

some ways the the nightmare of the

6:05

Corbyn years have actually shown that

6:06

the pendulum in the Labour party has

6:08

swung too far in the wrong direction. I

6:10

was there during the Corbyn time. You

6:11

know you were around. We know what it

6:12

was like. And so what the Labour Party

6:14

wanted to do was to have the polar

6:15

opposite to Corbyn which they've done.

6:18

Unfortunately going from hard far left

6:20

to the right. We should have actually

6:21

had

6:22

>> Here's the thing though, Stephen. If um

6:24

if he did decide to sack the chancellor,

6:26

>> who would replace her?

6:28

>> Well, good question.

6:29

>> It is a good question. Who who would be

6:31

your choice? Your top tip, your your top

解锁更多

免费注册以访问高级功能

互动查看器

观看带有同步字幕、可调节叠加层和完整播放控制的视频。

免费注册以解锁

AI 摘要

获取由 AI 立即生成的视频内容摘要、要点和结论。

免费注册以解锁

翻译

一键将字幕翻译成 100 多种语言。以任何格式下载。

免费注册以解锁

思维导图

将字幕可视化为交互式思维导图。一目了然地了解结构。

免费注册以解锁

与字幕聊天

提出关于视频内容的问题。直接从字幕中获取由 AI 驱动的答案。

免费注册以解锁

从您的字幕中获得更多

免费注册并解锁交互式查看器、AI 摘要、翻译、思维导图等。无需信用卡。

    Keir Starmer to SACK Rachel Ree… - 完整文字记录 | YouTubeTranscript.dev