YouTubeTranscript.dev vs Otter.ai
A YouTube-focused transcript tool vs a meeting transcription platform. Which is right for your video transcription needs?
TRY YOUTUBETRANSCRIPT.DEV FREE →QUICK VERDICT
YouTubeTranscript.dev is the better choice for YouTube video transcription — it accepts YouTube URLs directly, extracts transcripts in seconds, supports playlists and bulk processing, and costs less for video content. Otter.ai is the better choice for live meeting transcription with its Zoom/Teams integration, speaker identification, and real-time collaboration features. They serve different primary use cases.
YouTube Focus: YouTubeTranscript.dev vs Otter.ai
YouTubeTranscript.dev is purpose-built for YouTube. Paste any YouTube URL and get the transcript in seconds. It pulls native captions instantly or uses AI audio transcription when captions are unavailable. Everything is optimized for the YouTube workflow — playlists, bulk URLs, and a developer API that accepts YouTube URLs directly.
Otter.ai is primarily designed for live meeting transcription and Zoom/Teams/Google Meet integration. It can transcribe uploaded audio/video files, but there is no direct YouTube URL support. You would need to download the YouTube video first, then upload the file to Otter.
Verdict: YouTubeTranscript.dev is the clear winner for YouTube-specific workflows. Otter.ai is better for live meeting transcription.
Speed: Which Is Faster for YouTube Transcription?
Caption-based extraction takes under 10 seconds regardless of video length. AI audio transcription (for videos without captions) takes 2-20 minutes depending on duration. Bulk playlist extraction processes multiple videos in parallel.
Otter.ai processes uploaded audio at roughly real-time speed. A 10-minute video takes approximately 10 minutes to transcribe. There is no instant caption extraction option for YouTube videos.
Verdict: YouTubeTranscript.dev is dramatically faster — seconds vs minutes for YouTube videos with captions.
Accuracy: YouTubeTranscript.dev vs Otter.ai
When YouTube captions exist, extraction is 100% accurate (pulling original caption data). AI audio transcription delivers up to 95% accuracy across 100+ languages. For noisy audio, background music, and accents, the AI models handle diverse conditions well.
Otter.ai's speech recognition is highly regarded for English meeting audio, delivering 90-95% accuracy in clean conditions. Accuracy drops with heavy accents, background noise, or non-English content. Supports fewer languages than YouTubeTranscript.dev.
Verdict: Both are accurate. YouTubeTranscript.dev has the edge with native caption extraction (100% accurate) and broader language support.
Pricing: How Do Otter.ai and YouTubeTranscript.dev Compare?
Free tier with 10 credits/month, no credit card required. Paid plans: Basic $9/month (1,200 credits), Pro $29/month (4,000 credits), Business $79/month (11,000 credits). Credit-based pricing — one caption extraction costs 1 credit. All features available on all plans.
Otter.ai offers a free tier with 300 transcription minutes/month. Pro plan is $16.99/month (1,200 min), Business $30/month (6,000 min). Minute-based pricing means long videos cost proportionally more. Some features (custom vocabulary, advanced export) are locked to higher tiers.
Verdict: YouTubeTranscript.dev is more cost-effective for YouTube videos — caption extraction costs 1 credit regardless of video length, while Otter charges by the minute.
Export Formats: YouTubeTranscript.dev vs Otter.ai
Four export formats on all plans: TXT (plain text), SRT (subtitles), VTT (web subtitles), and JSON (structured data with word-level timestamps). All formats available on the free tier.
Otter.ai exports to TXT, DOCX, SRT, and PDF. Some formats require a paid plan. The SRT export is useful for subtitle work, and PDF is handy for sharing meeting notes.
Verdict: Similar format coverage. YouTubeTranscript.dev offers JSON for developers and makes all formats free. Otter adds PDF which is useful for meetings.
AI Features: Which Offers More?
AI-powered summary, mind map visualization, chat with transcript (ask questions about the video), translation to 100+ languages, and an Interactive Viewer with synced subtitle overlays. All built specifically for video content analysis.
Otter.ai offers AI-powered meeting summaries, action items extraction, live collaboration, and speaker identification. These features are optimized for meeting workflows rather than video content analysis.
Verdict: Different strengths. YouTubeTranscript.dev's AI features are tailored for video content (mind maps, chat, viewer). Otter's AI is meeting-focused (action items, live collaboration).
Bulk Processing: Playlists and Batch Extraction
Extract transcripts from entire YouTube playlists (up to 100 videos), batch URL processing, and a REST API with batch endpoints and webhook callbacks. Caption extraction runs in parallel — 50 videos in under a minute.
Otter.ai does not support bulk or playlist processing. Files must be uploaded and transcribed one at a time. There is no public API for batch processing.
Verdict: YouTubeTranscript.dev is the only option for bulk YouTube transcription. Otter has no playlist or batch support.
Developer API: YouTubeTranscript.dev vs Otter.ai
Full REST API with sync and async processing, batch endpoints, webhook callbacks, and detailed documentation. API access available on all plans including the free tier. Rate limits scale with plan level.
Otter.ai offers limited API access primarily through enterprise plans. The API is focused on meeting integration rather than general transcription. Not available on individual plans.
Verdict: YouTubeTranscript.dev has a far more accessible and capable API, available even on the free tier.
Language Support: Which Covers More Languages?
100+ languages for both caption extraction and AI audio transcription. One-click translation to convert any transcript to a different language. If a video has captions in multiple languages, you can select which one to extract.
Otter.ai supports English as its primary language with limited support for a handful of additional languages. It is heavily optimized for English meeting transcription.
Verdict: YouTubeTranscript.dev covers 100+ languages vs Otter's English-centric approach. The clear choice for multilingual needs.
Best Use Case: When to Choose Each Tool
Choose YouTubeTranscript.dev when you need to: transcribe YouTube videos, extract from playlists or channels, create subtitles from YouTube content, build apps with video transcripts, research video content, or work with non-English videos.
Choose Otter.ai when you need to: transcribe live meetings, integrate with Zoom/Teams/Meet, collaborate in real-time during calls, extract action items from discussions, or maintain searchable meeting archives.
Verdict: They serve different primary needs. YouTubeTranscript.dev is the specialist for YouTube; Otter.ai is the specialist for meetings.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Is YouTubeTranscript.dev better than Otter.ai for YouTube videos?+
Yes. YouTubeTranscript.dev is purpose-built for YouTube — paste a URL and get the transcript in seconds. Otter.ai requires downloading and uploading video files since it has no direct YouTube integration. For YouTube-specific work, YouTubeTranscript.dev is faster, easier, and more cost-effective.
Can Otter.ai transcribe YouTube videos directly?+
No. Otter.ai does not accept YouTube URLs directly. You would need to download the YouTube video or audio file first, then upload it to Otter for transcription. YouTubeTranscript.dev handles YouTube URLs natively — just paste and extract.
Which is cheaper for transcribing YouTube content?+
YouTubeTranscript.dev is more affordable for YouTube transcription. Caption extraction costs just 1 credit regardless of video length, while Otter.ai charges by the minute. A 2-hour video on Otter uses 120 minutes of quota; on YouTubeTranscript.dev it uses 1 credit.
Does Otter.ai support bulk YouTube playlist extraction?+
No. Otter.ai does not support playlist or bulk extraction. YouTubeTranscript.dev can process entire YouTube playlists (up to 100 videos) in parallel, completing in under a minute.
Which has better AI features for video content?+
YouTubeTranscript.dev offers AI summary, mind maps, chat with transcript, and translation — all designed for video content. Otter.ai's AI features (action items, live summaries) are optimized for meetings. Choose based on your primary use case.
Try YouTubeTranscript.dev Free
The fastest way to get YouTube transcripts. 10 free credits, no credit card.
GET STARTED FREE →