What Cathie Wood JUST Said.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
hey everyone meet kevin here in this
video we're going to talk about kathy
wood's latest a warning for markets and
at the same time i am going to
incorporate something that's really
really important no not just a newspaper
but the financial times
hidden
all the way
on page 17
way
at the bottom
is something really important
that we're going to talk about that
relates to this
in just a moment but first
we're gonna mention that you should get
life insurance in as little as five
minutes via the link down below go to my
kevin.com life or use that link down
below to apple pay or android pay for
life insurance you can get in as little
as five minutes for now though we will
listen to what kathy woods
greatest fear is going forward all right
let's listen in folks see what we got
we've been saying for some time that the
the risk to
uh the economy is more on the side of
deflation and inflation so uh as kovid
took uh you know created all the um
uh destruction that it did and
quick note worth noting that she's
starting off right away by saying hey
risk here deflation not inflation that
is the opposite of what consumers feel
right now consumer expectations are that
inflation is going to be at all time
highs for years and years and years
going forward but is it possible that
consumers are actually lagging in their
expectations of what's going to happen
that is consumers should have felt this
way a year ago for high inflation now
now we're in high inflation now
consumers suddenly think inflation's
going to stay around forever and are
they going to be wrong are we actually
going to deflate let's see why kathy
wood is into deflation and then we got
to talk about something in that article
that's going to be very important supply
chains really being thrown off we've
been through a period here of inflation
which
i think
investors are baking into the cake
that's the that's the underlying
assumption out there that we're in an
inflationary period and that it was
turbocharged uh by the supply chain
disruptions uh that occurred during the
herona virus and of course they will
they will be focused on monetary policy
when they say that
um
she's essentially saying hey look if
investors are worried that inflation is
getting worse because of supply chain
issues they're going to look at every
single word that the federal reserve
says because when the federal reserve
talks it kind of gives us a little bit
of a heads up in terms of oh what's the
fed going to do about inflation do they
actually think it's here to stay or are
they suggesting it's here longer or what
and that is actually exactly what jerome
paul is saying he's saying inflation has
lasted longer and been more present than
it was initially expected however they
still expect inflation to inflict
downwards now will inflation inflect all
the way downwards to
a deflationary level let's see
student of economic history and i've
lived quite a bit of it myself so i've
seen a lot of markets and started in the
business during the 70s i was in college
when inflation was raging
so i i know what that is and i truly
believe we are not going back there and
that anyone uh planning uh for it is
probably going to be making some
mistakes
so the three sources of deflation that
we see
um to go into a little more detail uh on
the innovation side
pay attention by the way to this part
because it's going to relate to
something very very important here a lot
of people have been talking about this
right here being a big cause for
inflation coming but the counter
argument here is insane so we're setting
this up with kathy the trojan horsey end
of this
and i'm being transparent about my horse
logically enabled innovation
we are in a period today like we have
never been never i mean you have to go
back to
telephone electricity and automobile to
see three major
technologically enabled sources of
innovation evolving at the same time
today we have five five platforms
uh dna sequencing robotics uh energy
storage artificial intelligence and
blockchain technology all of all five of
those things by the way have nothing to
do with the first three things like we
didn't have dna sequencing back in the
day it didn't have artificial
intelligence back in the day or robotics
back in the day uh it's it's incredible
the the place we're in right now and
she's right i mean think about it look
when the iphone first came out i was
using the t-mobile razer and that was
cool why was it cool because it had a
color
screen
and it was more pleasant to send texts
in it still had a physical keyboard the
iphone came out and people are like oh
my gosh there's no keyboard whatever
will we do
humans must feel a response from a key
in order to be able to type
boy what a
inappropriate argument that was from
consumer reports consumer reports did a
whole piece about how getting rid of the
keyboard was the stupidest thing you
could ever do
that aged well but anyway let's keep
going here because obviously and ask
yourself how much more productive really
like what do you think about this remote
let's say the t-mobile razor is 400 and
the iphone's 1600 right so the cost is
4x it's four times as expensive let's
say uh back in you know back in the day
uh how
uh but then again i am comparing uh the
the
and so i really have to ask you to say
how much more productive could you be on
an iphone today compared to a t-mobile
razer back in 2007.
probably 10 to 20 to 50 x
with apps navigation uh background app
notifications for news emails text
messages face time zoom on your phone uh
hot spotting to your laptop so you could
take your laptop and actually function
out in society don't get me wrong i was
able to hotspot back in 2008 because i
remember taking my big old 17-inch
toshiba laptop to go play world of
warcraft on it on the travel by
tethering it but i couldn't actually do
anything other than kind of standing
there and trying to hit rock nodes
because there's no way you're fighting
tethering back in 2007
but
i think the point here is very clear yes
technology makes things much more
efficient let's keep going which are
deflationary
and not just by a little bit either
and that's why i made this argument is
that generally technology makes things
cheaper like a flat screen tv for
example that used to cost two thousand
dollars i know that because i sold my
world of warcraft account made the
dumbest financial decision ever and took
that two thousand dollars and bought a
48
uh 48 inch flat screen tv for 2 000
sony bravia hdtv
my dad ended up taking it from me
because he really liked it uh we we
agreed to that i wasn't using it as much
uh and
i should have invested that but nobody
taught me that
anyway i had to learn that all myself
but the point is that tv today is
something you could pick up for like 300
right that's deflation in technology
another form of deflation even when
phones are getting more expensive is the
fact that your productivity is
skyrocketing that folks is a very
important key that i'm dropping you for
what we're about to talk about
jeff gundlach and
howard marks and i think stan
druckenmiller
and
ray dalio all of them i think have been
very very concerned about
um
a deflationary bust
and uh we agree with them
uh in
this respect uh we think it's going to
be balanced by a deflationary boom so
that's where we differ but where we
agree
is that this is actually a very big fork
here okay ray dalio thinks that as
prices fall potentially the economy
slows people are going to get into the
great de-leveraging pay off debt pay
after pay after pay off debt the economy
shrinks even more and more and more and
potentially collapses in a deflationary
spiral kathy wood thinks no as prices
come down we're going to become so much
more efficient and so much more
productive and our economy is actually
going to grow much faster than we think
it's going to grow different trains of
thought
i am on the side of kathy here but i
still listen to ray dalio and the others
like the buries of the world and so on
there are companies who thought the
world would never change
and uh have been
again catering uh to short-term
shareholders who wanted that extra penny
or two in earnings and so got it uh
by having the companies leverage up and
take more debt and shrink the number of
shares
uh
and they've also been um focused on
dividends uh
they are
probably saddled
with
products and services that will become
obsolete because of the
record-breaking amount of innovation
taking place today
and in order to service their debt
they are going to have to cut prices
uh
and this by the way is just a reference
to companies that are more indebted like
let's say ford motors has a lot of debt
personally i don't think like they're
overly indebted like i don't think
ford's going anywhere anytime soon
obviously i prefer the teslas and the
neos of the world but uh
and i do disagree and depart from kathy
wood here where she suggests that tesla
and the automotive space is going to be
a winner take all or when you take most
space she doesn't say all she says most
uh i i think there's going to be a
healthy amount of competition in evs i
do think tesla's going to take the
toyota lion's share but that only needs
to be like 15 of the market i think
there'll be plenty of room for like a
neo to hang out with five percent or
something like that maybe even more i
will see i i would honestly love
to to drive a neo if anybody has a
connection with where i could try out a
neo i will fly to china hit me up okay
staff meet kevin dot com all right let's
keep going move those uh those goods and
services that are on their way out
anyway
uh so i i am concerned about that and oh
uh and in case i didn't finish that
thought basically if ford has a lot of
debt the argument is that they might
have to drop their prices to service
their debt to stay competitive and
that's deflationary so you've got
innovation deflation you've got dropping
your prices because you're no longer
competitive deflation
and then of course we continue on
and according to our estimates
in the year 2035
because of automation and artificial
intelligence
we believe
that gdp here in the united states will
not be 28 trillion which would be a if
you drew the growth linear growth that's
where it would be
but instead will be 40 trillion dollars
and it is our okay that is a big claim
she's suggesting then rather than our
gdp growing from 20 uh 21 trillion
dollars to let's say 28 kind of that
linear growth which linear growth just
means line right just
moving up uh just to give you a quick
little example here we'll jump right
over here
so uh linear growth this this is what
kathy is saying these are sort of the
estimates now that by 2035 will be
somewhere like this she's suggesting
that this is wrong that because of
increases in productivity we're actually
going to see something more uh more in
line with
this
40 trillion dollars as a gdp by 2035 and
the difference here this uh this extra
fat here so to speak that is
productivity
due to
none other than
innovation boom and that's what kathy
would invest in after all i like
investing in that too let's keep going
uh focused only on innovation to figure
out where that extra 12 trillion dollars
is going to come from and then to
educate
and orient our investors of course but
also
parents and grandparents you know how
where how should you educate your
children you know how should you steer
them so that they are on the right side
of change because there are going to be
so many exciting opportunities
wow that is
incredible incredible piece here but
what's more interesting maybe not
necessarily more interesting but equally
interesting is this right here kathy
would briefly touch us on it but
folks this is so understated every time
i hear people talk about inflation
they're like well people are paying more
money for people who work minimum wage
jobs it's like yeah
we get it because less of those
less people who and this is statistical
less people working minimum wage jobs
are vaccinated therefore they're more
likely to want to stay home or away from
cove
potential exposure at least that's what
some studies have shown it's not going
to be true for everyone it's just an
increased percentage of people who work
uh service jobs are less likely to be
vaccinated therefore less likely to want
to return to work which is one of the
reasons there were so many arguments
around oh well maybe people go back to
work after the unemployment boost
expires whatever the point is we still
have an elevated unemployment rate and
so people are wondering okay does this
mean wages are going to continue to go
up and if wages continue to go up does
that mean we're going to continue to see
inflation because if wages go up this is
like the child argument here like this
is very very basic level economics okay
basic level economics
well if i pay somebody eight dollars an
hour to make this cup but now i have to
pay them ten dollars an hour to make
this cup i'll have to raise the price of
the cup by probably somewhere around
three dollars or two dollars and fifty
cents to make up for those higher wages
and the extra additional costs that go
with higher wages like workers comp and
insurances and blah blah blah blah so
wait just go up prices must go that's
the very elementary argument right
that's like econ like 100 we're not even
at 101 yet right that's basing okay you
want to you want to graduate to to like
the higher advanced levels of economics
that's what you're here for okay good
this was a great piece ready for this
okay the great inflation debate is it
sustained or transitory and one of the
most important features of the consumer
price index or the measure of inflation
and inflation in general is
labor costs and labor costs are not just
the wages that you pay this is really
important and i think this gets missed
so much especially here on youtube is
when people think wages up they
immediately think that's it inflation
must be going up right but there's this
this forgotten aspect of wait a minute
there are two parts to wages
wages are the uh the actual uh hourly
rate that you pay so this is sort of the
hourly rate you could even call this
sort of labor cost and then you can call
this hourly wages just to make this a
little bit more clear
but the other factor that goes into this
is very important and it's productivity
what if the person that i pay ten
dollars an hour to make this cup can
actually make me two cups and make you
know even though i'm paying them uh you
know 15 more what if they can double
their output and we can do
100x on on our cup production right
so productivity very important now kathy
touched on this but didn't go deep on
this
this was interesting this author says if
productivity accelerates
unit labor cost should remain stable
and show should prices so as long as
wages go up with increasing worker
productivity we shouldn't actually see
labor costs the top costs before the
fork go up and what's really cool is you
could just type into google st louis
fred
labor productivity
and you'll get this first google result
here labor productivity output per hour
all employed
individuals let's go to just the last
five years here look at this inflection
point
after the pandemic so starting in uh
well i mean i guess you could really say
well it's q2 all of this right here is
really cute too uh in q2 this inflection
to the upside if we drew this trend line
continued you know we did some technical
analysis here we'd be shy of where we
are now maybe we'd be somewhere right
here at this gray or a marker or a
reading of about 110 and we're actually
at one one two five and we expect that
pace of change that rate of change to
accelerate in favor of more productivity
as people start going back to work uh
and continue to go back to work since
people have already started go back to
work if productivity accelerates uh the
prices should remain stable here is
another thing there are many reasons to
believe firms will continue to invest
and increase productivity one they're
sitting on mounds of cash as a result of
stimulus programs and cheap credit
earnings growth has soared and labor is
no longer such a cheap substitute for
capital expenditure and firms have to
catch up after weak investment in other
words because labor is getting more
expensive people are now companies are
now purposefully plowing more money into
new machinery and innovation to reduce
input costs because labor's more
expensive so in a weird way as labor
gets more expensive the labor that we do
hire becomes more productive because now
it works with newly created or installed
machinery because they that's the only
way those jobs could be created in the
first place by being more efficient uh
and and i've previously talked about how
this pandemic has been sort of this in
my opinion cleanse for for corporations
uh where corporations were able to lay
off tens of thousands of people and then
just hire back the people that they
probably found were the most productive
now that's harsh to the people who are
not laid off or sorry who are not hired
back but uh i'm talking in the mindset
of an investor here not to offend so the
shift from working uh at home during the
pandemic may have also yielded
efficiency gains uh 65 of uh respondents
felt remote working has been good for
productivity jury is still out on this
though higher productivity growth though
also
means that the economy can maintain
stable prices even in the face of higher
wages this is this was money right here
uh like when you now look at this and
you you again you look at your inputs
for inflation oh car prices went up
airline prices went up wages are going
up yeah but wait a minute airline car
prices are temporary wedding dresses are
temporary price increases sure the
prices might stay at elevated levels for
a while but if people are getting paid
more and they're being more productive
we could actually grow and inflict down
inflation fascinating insights kathy
fascinating insights financial times
thank you so much for watching this
video make sure to get your life
insurance in as little as 5 minutes and
folks we'll see in the next one thanks
again bye
[Music]
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.