⚠️ Some features may be temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing 3rd party provider issue. We apologize for the inconvenience and expect this to be resolved soon.
TRANSCRIPTEnglish

What Cathie Wood JUST Said.

18m 43s3,387 words537 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

hey everyone meet kevin here in this

0:01

video we're going to talk about kathy

0:03

wood's latest a warning for markets and

0:06

at the same time i am going to

0:08

incorporate something that's really

0:09

really important no not just a newspaper

0:12

but the financial times

0:14

hidden

0:15

all the way

0:17

on page 17

0:19

way

0:20

at the bottom

0:21

is something really important

0:23

that we're going to talk about that

0:24

relates to this

0:27

in just a moment but first

0:29

we're gonna mention that you should get

0:30

life insurance in as little as five

0:31

minutes via the link down below go to my

0:33

kevin.com life or use that link down

0:35

below to apple pay or android pay for

0:36

life insurance you can get in as little

0:38

as five minutes for now though we will

0:39

listen to what kathy woods

0:44

greatest fear is going forward all right

0:47

let's listen in folks see what we got

0:49

we've been saying for some time that the

0:52

the risk to

0:54

uh the economy is more on the side of

0:56

deflation and inflation so uh as kovid

0:59

took uh you know created all the um

1:03

uh destruction that it did and

1:06

quick note worth noting that she's

1:08

starting off right away by saying hey

1:10

risk here deflation not inflation that

1:13

is the opposite of what consumers feel

1:16

right now consumer expectations are that

1:17

inflation is going to be at all time

1:19

highs for years and years and years

1:20

going forward but is it possible that

1:22

consumers are actually lagging in their

1:24

expectations of what's going to happen

1:26

that is consumers should have felt this

1:27

way a year ago for high inflation now

1:30

now we're in high inflation now

1:32

consumers suddenly think inflation's

1:34

going to stay around forever and are

1:35

they going to be wrong are we actually

1:36

going to deflate let's see why kathy

1:38

wood is into deflation and then we got

1:40

to talk about something in that article

1:42

that's going to be very important supply

1:44

chains really being thrown off we've

1:46

been through a period here of inflation

1:49

which

1:50

i think

1:51

investors are baking into the cake

1:53

that's the that's the underlying

1:55

assumption out there that we're in an

1:57

inflationary period and that it was

1:59

turbocharged uh by the supply chain

2:02

disruptions uh that occurred during the

2:04

herona virus and of course they will

2:06

they will be focused on monetary policy

2:08

when they say that

2:10

um

2:11

she's essentially saying hey look if

2:13

investors are worried that inflation is

2:15

getting worse because of supply chain

2:16

issues they're going to look at every

2:17

single word that the federal reserve

2:19

says because when the federal reserve

2:20

talks it kind of gives us a little bit

2:22

of a heads up in terms of oh what's the

2:24

fed going to do about inflation do they

2:25

actually think it's here to stay or are

2:27

they suggesting it's here longer or what

2:29

and that is actually exactly what jerome

2:31

paul is saying he's saying inflation has

2:33

lasted longer and been more present than

2:35

it was initially expected however they

2:37

still expect inflation to inflict

2:38

downwards now will inflation inflect all

2:40

the way downwards to

2:42

a deflationary level let's see

2:44

student of economic history and i've

2:46

lived quite a bit of it myself so i've

2:49

seen a lot of markets and started in the

2:51

business during the 70s i was in college

2:54

when inflation was raging

2:57

so i i know what that is and i truly

3:01

believe we are not going back there and

3:04

that anyone uh planning uh for it is

3:07

probably going to be making some

3:08

mistakes

3:09

so the three sources of deflation that

3:11

we see

3:13

um to go into a little more detail uh on

3:16

the innovation side

3:18

pay attention by the way to this part

3:20

because it's going to relate to

3:22

something very very important here a lot

3:25

of people have been talking about this

3:27

right here being a big cause for

3:29

inflation coming but the counter

3:31

argument here is insane so we're setting

3:34

this up with kathy the trojan horsey end

3:36

of this

3:37

and i'm being transparent about my horse

3:40

logically enabled innovation

3:43

we are in a period today like we have

3:46

never been never i mean you have to go

3:48

back to

3:50

telephone electricity and automobile to

3:52

see three major

3:54

technologically enabled sources of

3:56

innovation evolving at the same time

3:59

today we have five five platforms

4:02

uh dna sequencing robotics uh energy

4:06

storage artificial intelligence and

4:08

blockchain technology all of all five of

4:10

those things by the way have nothing to

4:12

do with the first three things like we

4:15

didn't have dna sequencing back in the

4:17

day it didn't have artificial

4:18

intelligence back in the day or robotics

4:20

back in the day uh it's it's incredible

4:23

the the place we're in right now and

4:25

she's right i mean think about it look

4:26

when the iphone first came out i was

4:29

using the t-mobile razer and that was

4:31

cool why was it cool because it had a

4:34

color

4:35

screen

4:36

and it was more pleasant to send texts

4:39

in it still had a physical keyboard the

4:41

iphone came out and people are like oh

4:43

my gosh there's no keyboard whatever

4:46

will we do

4:47

humans must feel a response from a key

4:50

in order to be able to type

4:52

boy what a

4:53

inappropriate argument that was from

4:55

consumer reports consumer reports did a

4:56

whole piece about how getting rid of the

4:58

keyboard was the stupidest thing you

5:00

could ever do

5:02

that aged well but anyway let's keep

5:05

going here because obviously and ask

5:06

yourself how much more productive really

5:08

like what do you think about this remote

5:10

let's say the t-mobile razor is 400 and

5:12

the iphone's 1600 right so the cost is

5:15

4x it's four times as expensive let's

5:17

say uh back in you know back in the day

5:20

uh how

5:21

uh but then again i am comparing uh the

5:23

the

5:28

and so i really have to ask you to say

5:30

how much more productive could you be on

5:32

an iphone today compared to a t-mobile

5:34

razer back in 2007.

5:38

probably 10 to 20 to 50 x

5:41

with apps navigation uh background app

5:45

notifications for news emails text

5:48

messages face time zoom on your phone uh

5:51

hot spotting to your laptop so you could

5:53

take your laptop and actually function

5:55

out in society don't get me wrong i was

5:57

able to hotspot back in 2008 because i

5:58

remember taking my big old 17-inch

6:00

toshiba laptop to go play world of

6:02

warcraft on it on the travel by

6:03

tethering it but i couldn't actually do

6:05

anything other than kind of standing

6:07

there and trying to hit rock nodes

6:08

because there's no way you're fighting

6:09

tethering back in 2007

6:11

but

6:12

i think the point here is very clear yes

6:14

technology makes things much more

6:16

efficient let's keep going which are

6:19

deflationary

6:20

and not just by a little bit either

6:24

and that's why i made this argument is

6:25

that generally technology makes things

6:27

cheaper like a flat screen tv for

6:29

example that used to cost two thousand

6:31

dollars i know that because i sold my

6:32

world of warcraft account made the

6:33

dumbest financial decision ever and took

6:35

that two thousand dollars and bought a

6:37

48

6:38

uh 48 inch flat screen tv for 2 000

6:41

sony bravia hdtv

6:44

my dad ended up taking it from me

6:46

because he really liked it uh we we

6:49

agreed to that i wasn't using it as much

6:50

uh and

6:53

i should have invested that but nobody

6:55

taught me that

6:57

anyway i had to learn that all myself

7:00

but the point is that tv today is

7:03

something you could pick up for like 300

7:05

right that's deflation in technology

7:08

another form of deflation even when

7:10

phones are getting more expensive is the

7:12

fact that your productivity is

7:14

skyrocketing that folks is a very

7:16

important key that i'm dropping you for

7:19

what we're about to talk about

7:20

jeff gundlach and

7:22

howard marks and i think stan

7:24

druckenmiller

7:25

and

7:26

ray dalio all of them i think have been

7:29

very very concerned about

7:31

um

7:32

a deflationary bust

7:34

and uh we agree with them

7:37

uh in

7:38

this respect uh we think it's going to

7:41

be balanced by a deflationary boom so

7:44

that's where we differ but where we

7:46

agree

7:47

is that this is actually a very big fork

7:50

here okay ray dalio thinks that as

7:52

prices fall potentially the economy

7:55

slows people are going to get into the

7:57

great de-leveraging pay off debt pay

7:59

after pay after pay off debt the economy

8:01

shrinks even more and more and more and

8:02

potentially collapses in a deflationary

8:05

spiral kathy wood thinks no as prices

8:08

come down we're going to become so much

8:09

more efficient and so much more

8:10

productive and our economy is actually

8:12

going to grow much faster than we think

8:14

it's going to grow different trains of

8:16

thought

8:17

i am on the side of kathy here but i

8:19

still listen to ray dalio and the others

8:21

like the buries of the world and so on

8:24

there are companies who thought the

8:26

world would never change

8:28

and uh have been

8:30

again catering uh to short-term

8:33

shareholders who wanted that extra penny

8:35

or two in earnings and so got it uh

8:39

by having the companies leverage up and

8:41

take more debt and shrink the number of

8:43

shares

8:44

uh

8:45

and they've also been um focused on

8:48

dividends uh

8:50

they are

8:51

probably saddled

8:53

with

8:54

products and services that will become

8:56

obsolete because of the

8:59

record-breaking amount of innovation

9:01

taking place today

9:03

and in order to service their debt

9:07

they are going to have to cut prices

9:10

uh

9:10

and this by the way is just a reference

9:12

to companies that are more indebted like

9:14

let's say ford motors has a lot of debt

9:16

personally i don't think like they're

9:18

overly indebted like i don't think

9:19

ford's going anywhere anytime soon

9:21

obviously i prefer the teslas and the

9:23

neos of the world but uh

9:25

and i do disagree and depart from kathy

9:27

wood here where she suggests that tesla

9:29

and the automotive space is going to be

9:31

a winner take all or when you take most

9:33

space she doesn't say all she says most

9:35

uh i i think there's going to be a

9:36

healthy amount of competition in evs i

9:38

do think tesla's going to take the

9:40

toyota lion's share but that only needs

9:43

to be like 15 of the market i think

9:45

there'll be plenty of room for like a

9:47

neo to hang out with five percent or

9:49

something like that maybe even more i

9:50

will see i i would honestly love

9:52

to to drive a neo if anybody has a

9:55

connection with where i could try out a

9:56

neo i will fly to china hit me up okay

9:59

staff meet kevin dot com all right let's

10:01

keep going move those uh those goods and

10:04

services that are on their way out

10:06

anyway

10:07

uh so i i am concerned about that and oh

10:11

uh and in case i didn't finish that

10:12

thought basically if ford has a lot of

10:14

debt the argument is that they might

10:15

have to drop their prices to service

10:17

their debt to stay competitive and

10:19

that's deflationary so you've got

10:20

innovation deflation you've got dropping

10:22

your prices because you're no longer

10:23

competitive deflation

10:25

and then of course we continue on

10:27

and according to our estimates

10:29

in the year 2035

10:33

because of automation and artificial

10:35

intelligence

10:36

we believe

10:37

that gdp here in the united states will

10:40

not be 28 trillion which would be a if

10:44

you drew the growth linear growth that's

10:46

where it would be

10:48

but instead will be 40 trillion dollars

10:51

and it is our okay that is a big claim

10:54

she's suggesting then rather than our

10:55

gdp growing from 20 uh 21 trillion

10:58

dollars to let's say 28 kind of that

11:00

linear growth which linear growth just

11:02

means line right just

11:04

moving up uh just to give you a quick

11:06

little example here we'll jump right

11:08

over here

11:09

so uh linear growth this this is what

11:11

kathy is saying these are sort of the

11:13

estimates now that by 2035 will be

11:17

somewhere like this she's suggesting

11:19

that this is wrong that because of

11:21

increases in productivity we're actually

11:23

going to see something more uh more in

11:25

line with

11:27

this

11:28

40 trillion dollars as a gdp by 2035 and

11:31

the difference here this uh this extra

11:35

fat here so to speak that is

11:38

productivity

11:39

due to

11:41

none other than

11:42

innovation boom and that's what kathy

11:44

would invest in after all i like

11:46

investing in that too let's keep going

11:48

uh focused only on innovation to figure

11:51

out where that extra 12 trillion dollars

11:54

is going to come from and then to

11:57

educate

11:58

and orient our investors of course but

12:02

also

12:03

parents and grandparents you know how

12:05

where how should you educate your

12:07

children you know how should you steer

12:10

them so that they are on the right side

12:12

of change because there are going to be

12:13

so many exciting opportunities

12:16

wow that is

12:18

incredible incredible piece here but

12:21

what's more interesting maybe not

12:22

necessarily more interesting but equally

12:24

interesting is this right here kathy

12:26

would briefly touch us on it but

12:29

folks this is so understated every time

12:33

i hear people talk about inflation

12:34

they're like well people are paying more

12:36

money for people who work minimum wage

12:37

jobs it's like yeah

12:39

we get it because less of those

12:42

less people who and this is statistical

12:44

less people working minimum wage jobs

12:46

are vaccinated therefore they're more

12:47

likely to want to stay home or away from

12:49

cove

12:50

potential exposure at least that's what

12:52

some studies have shown it's not going

12:53

to be true for everyone it's just an

12:54

increased percentage of people who work

12:56

uh service jobs are less likely to be

12:59

vaccinated therefore less likely to want

13:00

to return to work which is one of the

13:02

reasons there were so many arguments

13:03

around oh well maybe people go back to

13:05

work after the unemployment boost

13:06

expires whatever the point is we still

13:08

have an elevated unemployment rate and

13:10

so people are wondering okay does this

13:12

mean wages are going to continue to go

13:14

up and if wages continue to go up does

13:15

that mean we're going to continue to see

13:16

inflation because if wages go up this is

13:19

like the child argument here like this

13:20

is very very basic level economics okay

13:23

basic level economics

13:25

well if i pay somebody eight dollars an

13:28

hour to make this cup but now i have to

13:30

pay them ten dollars an hour to make

13:31

this cup i'll have to raise the price of

13:33

the cup by probably somewhere around

13:35

three dollars or two dollars and fifty

13:37

cents to make up for those higher wages

13:39

and the extra additional costs that go

13:40

with higher wages like workers comp and

13:42

insurances and blah blah blah blah so

13:44

wait just go up prices must go that's

13:46

the very elementary argument right

13:49

that's like econ like 100 we're not even

13:52

at 101 yet right that's basing okay you

13:54

want to you want to graduate to to like

13:56

the higher advanced levels of economics

13:58

that's what you're here for okay good

14:01

this was a great piece ready for this

14:04

okay the great inflation debate is it

14:06

sustained or transitory and one of the

14:09

most important features of the consumer

14:11

price index or the measure of inflation

14:13

and inflation in general is

14:15

labor costs and labor costs are not just

14:18

the wages that you pay this is really

14:21

important and i think this gets missed

14:22

so much especially here on youtube is

14:24

when people think wages up they

14:27

immediately think that's it inflation

14:29

must be going up right but there's this

14:31

this forgotten aspect of wait a minute

14:33

there are two parts to wages

14:35

wages are the uh the actual uh hourly

14:39

rate that you pay so this is sort of the

14:41

hourly rate you could even call this

14:42

sort of labor cost and then you can call

14:45

this hourly wages just to make this a

14:47

little bit more clear

14:49

but the other factor that goes into this

14:51

is very important and it's productivity

14:53

what if the person that i pay ten

14:56

dollars an hour to make this cup can

14:57

actually make me two cups and make you

15:00

know even though i'm paying them uh you

15:02

know 15 more what if they can double

15:04

their output and we can do

15:06

100x on on our cup production right

15:08

so productivity very important now kathy

15:11

touched on this but didn't go deep on

15:12

this

15:13

this was interesting this author says if

15:16

productivity accelerates

15:19

unit labor cost should remain stable

15:23

and show should prices so as long as

15:26

wages go up with increasing worker

15:29

productivity we shouldn't actually see

15:32

labor costs the top costs before the

15:34

fork go up and what's really cool is you

15:36

could just type into google st louis

15:38

fred

15:39

labor productivity

15:41

and you'll get this first google result

15:43

here labor productivity output per hour

15:45

all employed

15:47

individuals let's go to just the last

15:49

five years here look at this inflection

15:51

point

15:52

after the pandemic so starting in uh

15:54

well i mean i guess you could really say

15:56

well it's q2 all of this right here is

15:57

really cute too uh in q2 this inflection

16:00

to the upside if we drew this trend line

16:03

continued you know we did some technical

16:05

analysis here we'd be shy of where we

16:07

are now maybe we'd be somewhere right

16:09

here at this gray or a marker or a

16:11

reading of about 110 and we're actually

16:13

at one one two five and we expect that

16:17

pace of change that rate of change to

16:19

accelerate in favor of more productivity

16:22

as people start going back to work uh

16:24

and continue to go back to work since

16:26

people have already started go back to

16:27

work if productivity accelerates uh the

16:29

prices should remain stable here is

16:31

another thing there are many reasons to

16:33

believe firms will continue to invest

16:36

and increase productivity one they're

16:38

sitting on mounds of cash as a result of

16:40

stimulus programs and cheap credit

16:42

earnings growth has soared and labor is

16:44

no longer such a cheap substitute for

16:47

capital expenditure and firms have to

16:48

catch up after weak investment in other

16:50

words because labor is getting more

16:52

expensive people are now companies are

16:54

now purposefully plowing more money into

16:57

new machinery and innovation to reduce

17:00

input costs because labor's more

17:02

expensive so in a weird way as labor

17:04

gets more expensive the labor that we do

17:06

hire becomes more productive because now

17:08

it works with newly created or installed

17:11

machinery because they that's the only

17:14

way those jobs could be created in the

17:16

first place by being more efficient uh

17:18

and and i've previously talked about how

17:20

this pandemic has been sort of this in

17:22

my opinion cleanse for for corporations

17:25

uh where corporations were able to lay

17:26

off tens of thousands of people and then

17:28

just hire back the people that they

17:29

probably found were the most productive

17:31

now that's harsh to the people who are

17:33

not laid off or sorry who are not hired

17:35

back but uh i'm talking in the mindset

17:37

of an investor here not to offend so the

17:39

shift from working uh at home during the

17:42

pandemic may have also yielded

17:43

efficiency gains uh 65 of uh respondents

17:46

felt remote working has been good for

17:48

productivity jury is still out on this

17:50

though higher productivity growth though

17:52

also

17:53

means that the economy can maintain

17:55

stable prices even in the face of higher

17:58

wages this is this was money right here

18:01

uh like when you now look at this and

18:03

you you again you look at your inputs

18:05

for inflation oh car prices went up

18:08

airline prices went up wages are going

18:10

up yeah but wait a minute airline car

18:11

prices are temporary wedding dresses are

18:13

temporary price increases sure the

18:14

prices might stay at elevated levels for

18:16

a while but if people are getting paid

18:17

more and they're being more productive

18:19

we could actually grow and inflict down

18:21

inflation fascinating insights kathy

18:24

fascinating insights financial times

18:25

thank you so much for watching this

18:26

video make sure to get your life

18:27

insurance in as little as 5 minutes and

18:28

folks we'll see in the next one thanks

18:30

again bye

18:33

[Music]

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.