it's over

All right, Nome's been warning warning

that we will not have an election in

2028. Let's take a look and uh see why

he thinks by the way this morning

recommending that children don't take

Tylenol

advancing further now in the aggression

against Tylenol but also vaccines uh

arguing that the measles ms and reubella

vaccine should not be given as a one

dose vaccine or sort of like one one

combined vaccine rather should be given

over time and that hepatitis uh vaccine

should be delayed It's unclear where a

lot of these uh these these sort of

quote unquote scientific claims are

coming from beyond potential or loose

links. I mean, we broke down, you know,

buying Tylenol stock was the video. We

broke down the Tylenol analysis in depth

and found only loose links between

Tylenol intake during pregnancy and

autism that don't clearly distinguish

whether there was an increase of

fractional increase in autism and

children with mothers who were pregnant

and took Tylenol due to the underlying

symptom that they were treating or the

drug itself. Of course, that's then

where people get into the uh debate

about depletion inside of the brain. And

so people make arguments. We we covered

all of these studies in detail in that

video. But uh these are just some extra

things to keep in mind. Trump now also

Republicans have done very well is

convince that even if you're poor,

voting for Republicans is the way to go.

They'll cut your Medicaid. They'll ruin

and bankrupt your farms. And they'll

give tax breaks to the rich and

companies like, you know, Nvidia or chip

installers. But they'll do it with the

American flag. This is to make America

great. The Democrats don't really have

any good messaging. Like frankly, the

best messaging the Democrats have right

now are people like Mammi who's a commie

or AOC

may as well be. And then this guy who

sucks. So,

you know, I don't know. I don't know.

Maybe the Pelosis are an option.

Probably not. Yeah, too old at this

point. But then again, you know, age

hasn't stopped other politicians that

this is what he's trying to do is

literally Co Bearer just told us, "Oh,

you run on logic and not fear and Gavin

Newsome is now creating the fear that

you might be stuck with Donald Trump

forever." This is a pure fear campaign.

What Nsome is trying to do is unite

Democrats and people who are frustrated

with Trump because there are also

Republicans who are frustrated with

Trump uh obviously fewer uh than there

are Democrats who are frustrated with

Trump to unite all of them behind him.

That's what this is. Is how many zingers

and headlines can you get to actually

utilize the Trump playbook of always

being in the news to consolidate people

around you?

Now, Donald Trump has this just adds

fuel to the fire. Mused about this idea

of, oh, you know, we'll decide if we're

going to run for a third term or not.

And he sort of said so half jokingly.

Obviously, we know it's

unconstitutional, but that does lead

people to start wondering what does he

have up his sleeves.

Uh some people by the way also talking

about uh this this uh this big meeting

with all generals and admirals coming in

to the um uh Quanico facility next week

as really being a fidelity alignment

meeting and basically getting the

military to line up with the Trump

agenda to politicize it. We're already

seeing the squashing of uh free speech

uh reporting inside of the Pentagon. Now

everything needs approval before it can

leave the Pentagon. Otherwise, you'll

have your press credentials revoked.

People suggest that utilizing the

military could be a way to actually

prevent an election in 2028 under some

form of quote unquote state of

emergency. Oh, I need to stay in power

because of, you know, China or Russia or

this that or whatever. So, they kind of

leave it on that. Mind you, this a lot

of these when when they do these shows,

they kind of pre-practice them the day

before and they plan that out like, "Oh,

yeah. We're gonna we're gonna uh, you

know, cliffhanger that line there." So,

you could just look stern and powerful

and and we'll we'll zoom out and and

we'll like I mean, just look at the

faces here. Like, this is so like

planned media,

you know? Uh, so as part of this late

show, they also talked about um

the let's see what did they have. We put

a mirror up to the absurdity of Donald

Trump's uh of of Donald Trump. Okay,

let's let's see what they say here.

[Applause]

>> Because it is very common for

politicians to lose the midterms. Very

very common. Uh there's a comment here.

What's the difference between signing an

NDA uh and the press not being allowed

to disclose information from a

government building? Uh the difference

is

uh president uh the press in America has

regularly had unfettered access to the

Department of Defense to provide

reporting to the public on how our tax

dollars are being spent. We fund the

government with our hard-earned money

that we get taxed with. They take that

and spend it. We demand transparent

reporting on what is going on, where is

the money being spent, what companies

are benefiting from that spending, what

politicians are involved in allocating

spending. When we all of a sudden remove

transparency from where we have always

had it under Democratic and Republican

institutions, we shroud government

spending in secrecy. You should not

defend the requirement that media

individuals will have their press

credentials revoked

for reporting on what they're finding

out inside of the Department of Defense,

now Department of War. That has

historically has been a benefit to

Americans that is now rugpulled. That's

very different from signing like a

corporate NDA where it's like, "Hey, we

have a, you know, we're going to tell

you about corporate secrets." Duh.

in every category. He's Donald Trump is

weakness masquerading as strength. He's

weak in every key category. That's a

fact. Uh that's not a fact. Donald Trump

is pretty damn strong on the border.

He's pretty damn strong with his

aggression in the courts and fighting.

I'm not saying he is always right, but

he is aggressive in the courts.

He is not afraid to fight. He's not

afraid to lose, so he goes for the

fight. He's very aggressive on

immigration and what we're seeing with

with, you know, the ICE raids. That's

strength. Now, I disagree with how

aggressive they're being with whom

they're raiding,

but that doesn't mean Trump isn't strong

about it. I think it was strength to

bomb Iran. Now, I think it was a mistake

because Donald Trump then told us,

"We're going to negotiate with Iran next

week." Remember the chief minister of

propaganda, the press secretary? She's

like, "Oh, yeah. We're going to be

meeting with Iran next week." Never

happened. Total bull crap. There was

never a deal with Iran. There was never

a solution to what happened. All we did

was send Iran deeper underground. So

again, though, that is still strength. I

think it was strength and a mistake

because oh wow, what's happening now?

After US strikes, Iran increases work at

mysterious underground site called

Pickax Mountain. No duh, because it's

too deep for us to strike. We can't

reach our bust bunker buster bombs

there. So, no, Gavin Newsome, it is not

that's a fact that Donald Trump is weak.

He literally just said Donald Trump is

weak and that's a fact. No, it's not.

There are plenty of examples of Donald

Trump being very strong. Now, it could

be strong and wrong in some cases, but

there are plenty of cases where where

Donald Trump is very aggressive in what

he wants. Even you could even say that

what he's doing with this government

shutdown is strength. It's, hey, we're

going to brand it on Democrats. Our goal

is to shrink the size of government.

We're going to fire a bunch of people

if, you know, the government shuts down.

It's going to be both Democrats and

Republicans fault if there's a shutdown

because both sides are being stubborn.

Donald Trump will brand it as Democrat's

fault, but he'll use it as an

opportunity to let VA go to hell and

fire a bunch of people. He's going to

come in with like the grim reaper. Those

are forms of strength. So, no, Gavin

Newsome, you're wrong. You're trying to

say that Donald Trump isn't strong. That

doesn't land because you're wrong.

Again, by the way, who has been on my

plane, I agree that Abbott, by the way,

is to total shell for the Trump

administration. And that's why I think

when unemployment claims came in strong

like two weeks ago, all of a sudden you

had the state of Texas that's like, you

know, we had this unusual spike of fraud

claims on unemployment claims cuz it was

tanking the market a smidge. Uh and as

soon as like they cleared that up, oh,

we hit our $600 price target on the

triple Q's. Uh yeah, go meet me Kevin

membership. But but it's like come on,

man. We're starting not to trust some of

the data anymore, right? Like this is

where Trump is being strong on data, but

it's wrong again, right? Some you

fracking weeny little [ __ ]

New we need the National Guard in

California. In 2021, before anybody

talked about deploying the National

Guard, I ran a campaign for governor

against this very guy and I said, "We

need the National Guard to stop people

dying on our streets. Let's situate it.

Stop the homeless crisis. No more

encampments. No more people dying on the

streets. No more drugs. Let's solve the

mental health crisis. Let's spend the

money. Let's cut the money on your

stupid bullet train and let's spend the

money on things that need to be done

like making our streets safe. If we need

to use the National Guard to temporarily

do that, we pay for it because America

should be safe. I stand with Donald

Trump on this. And you know me, I I [ __ ]

on all the politicians. I crap on Biden.

I crap on Trump. I crap on them all cuz

I think they're all a scam. But I stand

with Trump on the use of the National

Guard because our streets should be

safe. I actually think Trump took the

idea from me. I know I'm just patting

myself on the bat right now. But on the

back right now, but then again, you

know, how could you blame him?

>> Kevin is very talented, but I don't know

it's going to be him, but he's a very

talented guy.

>> Kevin's somebody would consider Kevin is

fantastic, too.

>> Yeah,

we know they're watching. Okay. So, the

take the ideals from the campaign. When

I ran for governor and said, "If I lose,

the best thing that could happen is my

ideas end up getting implemented by

other people." Trump's deploying the

National Guard, dude, I had the biggest

smile on my face. I'm like, "Hell yeah."

So, this idea, oh, Trump is bans ICE

from concealing their identities, which

is which is a great idea. I actually

don't think that's a great idea. I

listen, you could be upset. I I have

said in this segment I don't like what

ICE is doing. I don't like it at all.

Okay. I I I I think it's wrong. That

said, it is the policy of the president.

And will I say that ICE shouldn't be

able to protect their identity so when

they go walk around Walmart with their

kids, they don't have to worry about

getting stabbed or shot? Nah, man. Let

them wear masks. Let them do their jobs

and let them conceal. I don't I have no

problem whatsoever with law enforcement

concealing their identities. This is why

cops, you have to understand this is

normal. And I was a law enforcement, you

know, law enforcement explorer for 3

years. I have 2,000 hours on the road.

The reason why cops often don't live

where they work is because when they go

to Trader Joe's and they just want to

take their, you know, six-year-old or

70-year-old to Trader Joe's or to the

park and then they see some scumbag that

they threw in jail for, you know, drug

trafficking or whatever. That's a little

uncomfortable encounter at the

playground.

It's not safe. Keep in mind like you the

place to disagree with law enforcement

is in court.

If ICE comes up to me,

points a gun at me and says, "Hands up.

Hands behind your back."

I'm not even gonna say anything. I'm

just gonna cooperate. I ain't getting

shot. Do you think that like now I'm

going to get manhandled or like punched

in the face or beaten or whatever? You

know, you start going, "Why? Why? I'm a

citizen. I have rights,

bro. Deal with that later. That's what

courts are for."

But you have to realize law enforcement

has uh has has powers that can be

abused, which that's what the courts are

for to remedy. But what if I go walk

outside and somebody says, "Hey, there's

a guy with a short with short shorts

and, you know, a Tesla Cybert truck

sweater and he's got a gun and he's

pointing it at people, you know, and

then cops come up and it's totally, you

know, maybe a total [ __ ] report,

right? Then cops come like, get on the

ground, get on the ground." It's like,

man, I'm just going to get on the

ground. Like, I could be a citizen,

which I am, you know, I could be totally

right, they could be totally wrong. At

that moment, the law enforcement

officers have probable cause to detain

me up until the point that they verify

no, there's no gun, he's a citizen, and

then you get released.

That's how law enforcement in the

country works.

But if somebody says, "Put your hands

behind your back and they got a badge

and they're deputized and they got a gun

and you're going to do that." No, I have

rights. You're gonna get your ass thrown

to the ground and you're gonna get beat.

So, wake up. Understand how the law in

the country works

and get over it. It is what it is. Now,

we can disagree with what ICE is being

told to do, which I do. I'm making that

clear. I don't agree with all the ICE

raids, but you know, some of these some

of these like complaints are just

nonsense. And and they're they're

usually founded in people not

understanding how law enforcement

actually work. probable cause to arrest

uh wrong. Uh you only need reasonable

suspicion to detain someone up until the

point that you can ascertain you have

probable cause to continue the

detainment uh in the course of you

exploring your investigation and

conducting your investigation or you

verify that you no longer have the right

to detain someone in which case you must

release them. Right? So, and and a

detainment can look like an arrest

because if somebody's not cooperating,

they get handcuffs put on them, which is

just a form of a secure detainment

technically. Uh there's a difference

between detainment and arrest, but but

you know, the handcuffs aren't exactly

the signal for that. Um anyway,

look, we we could go on and on about law

enforcement and and how law enforcement

actually works, but the point here is

bottom line, Gavin Newsome is trying to

outrage his way into the Democratic

leadership position. The problem is the

Democratic party doesn't have a

platform. you know, Gavin Newsome is

doing the typical Democratic thing where

it's like, oh, Trump is a dictator,

these abuses and Trump is weak, which

we, you know, have disagreed with, but

there's no unified platform. If

Democrats actually stood on a platform

rather than complaining about the use of

the National Guard to protect our

streets and our citizens rather than

complaining about that weak argument,

why don't you come up with a real

platform

and then you can have a leader

socializing grocery stores in New York

City probably isn't a good platform, but

whatever. That's that's my take on this

Newsome disaster.

>> Who knows about this? We'll we'll try a

little advertising and see how it goes.

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

much. People love you. People look up to

you.

>> Kevin Papra there, financial analyst and

YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to

get your take.