*Bombshell FBI Interview on Charlie Kirk Shooter*

Here's some of the latest on what's

going on with the Charlie Kirk shooting

by Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson

apparently is not cooperating with

authorities,

but there's now talk about a DNA link.

And so, we're going to watch Cash Patel

talk about that. Also, a lot of folks

talking about how this rifle in this

newer box right here may not have been

the firing weapon. This weapon was found

with shell casings such as catch this

fascist arguing, you know, these

potential leftist tendencies of Tyler

Robinson. A lot of speculation around

how this scope couldn't have reasonably

been fired in this position. Some people

questioning if the scope slid back after

being shot. If this is somebody who had

a new rifle and they didn't tighten it

appropriately and that's why maybe one

shot was taken, it slid back and, you

know, the individual left. Um, here's an

example where somebody shows their uh

very similar boltaction rifle. You know,

here's here's obviously your bolt action

uh showing the alignment of the scope

with the uh back of uh of the rifle here

before you get into the stock. Uh so,

you know, a lot about this, but what

apparently is now coming out is that uh

Kosh Patel is saying investigators have

found DNA evidence linking Tyler

Robinson to the scene of last week's

shooting. that apparently DNA was found

on a screwdriver, which I have to say

that's kind of impressive to lift DNA

off a screwdriver. Uh, I mean, I suppose

it's a simple, clean surface, but boy, I

mean, you'd have to get like sweat or

something off of there and just swab a

screwdriver. That's pretty impressive.

But anyway, and on a towel, uh, I mean,

who knows? Maybe that was like a hair

follicle or whatever because, you know,

hair itself doesn't have DNA. It's your

hair root. I guess it wouldn't be a

follicle. the root of a hair that would

have the DNA. But anyway, DNA was found

on a screwdriver as well as a towel that

was wrapped around the firearm believed

to be used in the shooting. I can report

today that DNA hits from the towel that

was wrapped around the firearm and the

DNA on the screw are positively

processed for the suspect in custody.

Now, we'll take a listen to some parts

of this here. This is where you see the

FBI discuss this idea of uh Tyler's

roommate uh transitioning. The thing to

talk about here is yesterday we spoke at

length about the potential uh lack of a

home that Tyler had a community, right?

and his relationship with his

potentially trans roommate and then

whether Tyler Robinson is gay or trans

himself or whatever and and how all of

this could be tied into mental illness

and and why would he do such a thing. A

lot of this is as we always have to

remember speculation to some extent

because we we don't have the answers. We

don't know what drugs Tyler Robinson was

on if any. We don't know uh all of the

facts or details yet. But these are

things we're going to be looking for. So

let's get into this.

>> So roommate was indeed a boyfriend uh

who who is transitioning from uh from

male to female and that that uh that he

is cooperating with uh with authorities.

>> A Fox News alert. Charlie Kirk's murder

suspect refusing to cooperate.

>> Refusing to cooperate, but then they

find this DNA evidence. So, what we're

going to do now is let's fast forward a

little bit and let's get into the Cash

Patel interview and let's see what Patel

has to say. around 5:00 p. p.m. local on

September 11th was walk the entire crime

scene, including the foots the sub

suspect himself took. And what we

learned was there was evidence, DNA

evidence that could be collected and had

been collected, including a screwdriver

that was found on the rooftop. Also, we

went over to the scene in the wooded

area where the fire

>> Oh, the screwdriver, by the way, that

could be what he used to adjust the

scope with. And maybe he just didn't do

a good job. Who knows? arm was discarded

and the firearm had a towel wrapped

around it. It's important. I'll get back

to that later. I even walked into the

wooded area in the ravine. So, I knew

from my investigative experience what I

>> By the way, big respect for Cash Patel

being there and actually going to the

scene himself. I think this is a great

way for the administration to show how

serious they're taking this. And I think

it's awesome they sent Vance and Cash

Patel there

>> could bring to the table and what

decisions I needed to make and having

the support of President Trump and the

full support of the

>> Oh, somebody saying the screwdriver was

to break down the gun. Well, remember we

saw him carrying it in his pants. It's

possible that it was not necessarily to

break down the gun. I suppose it could

have been. It might have been to

assemble the gun because he had it in

his pants, right? So maybe, you know, to

to like get the scope seated, he needed

the screwdriver.

>> The White House was what we needed for

these resources to happen. And I can

report today that the DNA hits from the

towel that was wrapped around the

firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver

are positively processed for the suspect

in custody.

>> Let's go.

>> So, Mr. Director, that that is vital.

That is breaking news.

>> I mean, remember, people are always

innocent uh until proven guilty, but

this is pretty damning, right?

especially if he's not cooperating. It

does sound like his boyfriend or

roommate or whatever it is, girlfriend.

Nobody really knows what to call the

person at this point, is cooperating

with the FBI. So, we'll see. We also got

a report now FBI is investigating at

least seven social media accounts that

appear to have prior Holy crap. No way.

The FBI is investigating at least seven

social media accounts that appear to

have prior knowledge of the Charlie Kirk

Association assassination plan. I can't

even say it correctly because that that

is a huge allegation. That is a huge

allegation that potentially there were

seven social media accounts that knew

this was happening because that means

they didn't end up saying anything,

right? That's where it gets bad is if

you knew this was going to happen and

you didn't say anything about it. That's

dirty. That now you're complicit in

murder.

That's that's scary. Uh so wow. Wow. If

that's true, that's huge. Okay, let's uh

let's keep going.

>> News and vital information because now

you have the casings uh for the the the

gun. So you connect the gun. Now you got

his DNA on it. That's huge. But I also

want to get to another part of

>> I just got to interrupt. Sorry. Not not

I just got to interrupt. We have the DNA

on the screwdriver that was found on the

rooftop and the towel that the firearm

was wrapped in. The firearm itself. This

is a great point. Thanks. Thanks for

raising it. That is being processed by

ATF ATF laboratories in Maryland. And I

believe they'll speak to that at a later

date when their process is incomplete.

But I just want to let you know the FBI

handled the screwdriver and the towel

found on

>> That is important clarification, Mr.

director, I want to get to the 20

members in that group chat. Have they

been brought in from questioning? And

the group chat that we from our

reporting that we're hearing is from

after the assassination. Do you have the

messages from before the assassination?

>> Well, let me take a step back and tell

you what we were doing while we were

there and how we were led to the suspect

so that this all fits into the puzzle.

We as soon as we learned of the

shooting, we were able to at uh I think

Charlie Kirk was shot at 12:23 uh local

time on September 10th. Uh by 12:39 p.m.

local time, FBI assets were on scene

securing the scene. Uh we then uh

launched at 10:00 a.m. the next day, the

first images of the suspect. Uh myself

and the deputy arrived at 5:00 p.m.

local time on September 11th. And then

what we did was decided to have a press

conference at 8:00 p.m. local where we

issued for the first time FBI obtained

photo video footage that we seized from

the security camera surveillance system

and new images, new images, enhanced

images, we decided I decided to release

immediately to the public because we

were working with the public and the

media to find this killer. Shortly after

that 8:00 p.m. release at 1000 p.m.

local time, the suspect was in custody.

Why? because the father informed us

pursuant to an interview of him.

>> Yeah, it was the uncle. The uncle saw

the picture. So, the Wall Street Journal

reported that the uncle saw the picture.

The picture is what led to the arrest.

So, the FBI identified the individual.

They had their press conference. I

covered this and they said in a shortly

we'll be releasing photos. When the

photo was released, the uncle saw the

photo. The uncle then gets on the phone

and calls the father and the father

says, "My day just went to shit." Well,

duh.

Nei and then of course the the uncle and

the father dialogued that they had no

idea why Tyler Robinson would do this.

Then it turned to the father and

apparently the minister of of that

family, uh maybe their local church or

whatever. Remember, they're from a small

town, seems to be very uh, you know, a

very Christian uh, community, very small

town, and uh, potentially if Tyler

Robinson had, you know, other sexual

tendencies that wouldn't fit in, meaning

that potentially he had mental health

issues before he left home, then went to

a school that he ended up dropping out

of after a semester there, suggesting he

couldn't fit in over there as well.

We're not looking for excuses here.

We're just trying to put together the

pieces of the puzzle here to see, okay,

here's here was a person that even his

mother, who was a social worker,

couldn't identify, was having problems,

which is weird because the Thomas Krooks

uh assassin, the Trump assassin,

attempted assassin, his mother and

father were social workers. It's just

weird. It's all weird. But it was the

uncle who saw the picture. So the

picture led to this capture

>> that he looked at the video that we

>> Yes. And then I see somebody in the

Alfonso in the comments says, "So, did

they get the 100K?" The FBI did release

a bounty for $100,000 for information

leading to the arrest. I hope they did.

Hopefully the FBI doesn't loophole out

of that because they definitely made him

turn himself in. Uh, you know, they did

their part as as you're supposed to do.

But, uh, that bounty was huge. Okay. You

usually only see that for FBI top 10

most wanted people. That is a huge

bounty. You usually see 10 to 20K for

these bounties. 100K. That was a huge

historically huge bounty and I think it

was probably Trump getting on the phone

being like catch this son of a [ __ ]

This is uh you know this is an assault

on MAGA and we're not standing for you

know that I think that's what happened

here. He

>> released that evening and the enhanced

photos and identified this suspect.

That's how fast the FBI was working to

put out information in real time. And

for comparative sake the Boston bombing

the FBI didn't release images for 3

days. We know we didn't have three days.

We made I made an executive decision on

an investigative and operational need

and it turned out to be the right move

because the men and women of the FBI

said that's what we should be doing.

>> Yeah. I mean like look I I don't think

like I have my own criticisms of of some

of the things that Kos Patel does. Like

I think sometimes some of the things he

says are confusing. Uh you know I again

like I'll walk some of that back. It

doesn't matter for the context of this

video. My opinion about Patel does not

matter. Uh, but that now qualifying that

my opinion doesn't matter. I will say I

personally believe that was a good

decision to release the photo because

ultimately it proved results.

>> Video was released. We said it here on

Fox and Friends. Someone's going to

recognize this this person

>> because someone was friends with him,

his family. Someone knows this guy.

Those images were crystal clear. Tell us

what you know about his background.

>> I'm honestly surprised the kid didn't

wear a mask. childhood, his father.

>> Like, if you had a ski mask on, you know

how much harder it'd be to find this

schmuck right now if he had a ski mask

on.

I And I know that's weird. Like, how are

you going to wear a ski mask and not get

people to call the cops on you? Even a

COVID mask, you know, do the do the

Luigi Magion, wear a wear a, you know,

an N95 and sunglasses with a hoodie.

Dude, you couldn't see him at all. But

he didn't. He had his face out clear as

day. Hey, I mean, he had sunglasses, but

who cares?

>> Who had to turn him in?

>> And and I'm sorry, I didn't mean to

ignore the last question. Going back to

the group chats real quick, there's more

than 20 individual.

>> Somebody says you don't get out of the

event with a ski mask. I agree. The ski

mask is not the best example, but

remember, he also wasn't in the event.

You know, he was able to escape right

into the parking lot, which we suspected

before we got the footage that that's

exactly what the shooter would do, and

it's exactly what ended up happening.

>> But this is a great point. I want to lay

out how this works. People thinks we can

just get in these group chats and

immediately find out who's in there.

>> Somebody's like, "Don't don't help the

crazies." Well, I mean, this is a red

flag, right? If you see somebody with a

mask and glasses and a hoodie on, you

know, you should be a little sused out.

It's more of a warning.

>> We, the FBI, are the investigatory body

supporting multiple prosecutions and

ongoing investigations. And that's

another point. Our investigation at the

FBI is ongoing. Um, and there are scores

of people in this Discord chat room. But

we have to effectuate legal process. We

have to go out there with search

warrants so that if prosecutors want to

later use this evidence. It's not

tainted by being illegally obtained. We,

the FBI, are running the investigation

pointly on the Discord chat group. There

are scores of individuals that are going

to be spoken to. There are also lots of

family members and friends that have

already been spoken to. And one more

point on forensics. We were able to

obtain in record time the text message

chain between the suspect and his living

partner as well as other uh critical

cellular information from our CAST team

that analyzes cell phone data towers in

the area to pinpoint the locations of

the suspect and other individuals he was

speaking with. This is critical.

>> Yeah. Just so you know how that works,

all phones are tracked on their

locations. We don't necessarily know

who's who. But if we have a suspect

and like you zoom into let's say my

house right now, you might see two dots.

You'll see a Lauren dot and a Kevin dot.

You don't necessarily know which one's

which. But then you see the dot go to

Starbucks. And then I post on Instagram.

Yo, I'm at Starbucks. Whatever. Right

now you know that of those two dots,

that one is probably Kevin. Now you

could follow that dot around the world

wherever you want. So you don't have to

necessarily know like what you could do

is look at all right whose dot was on

that roof and just follow that dot where

it goes. You don't have to know that

that's Tyler Robinson's phone. You just

have to know that that dot was at that

roof and we're going to follow that dot.

So the cell phone tracking data is

really really scary good right now.

Really scary good. And that voids, by

the way, like that goes way past all

your privacy concerns because it's not

identified to you. So, anybody can get

this data almost. Uh, it's really scary

>> information that the FBI processed and

got to prosecutors so they can lawfully

use it in a court of law. And, uh, our

our investigation, our interviews

continue, but we've learned some

shocking things when we, uh, spoke to

his family and friends as well.

>> You want to share them,

>> those shocking things?

>> Uh, sure. And I and my my my job as FBI

director is not to speak to motive, is

to speak to the facts. And that's what

I'm going to do. His family has

collectively told investigators that he

subscribed to left-wing ideology and

even more so in these last couple of

years.

>> And he uh had a text message exchange.

>> And remember what we found yesterday? We

we discussed this yesterday in our

research that

I most most Americans are more moderate

than the extreme social media that they

might listen to. Like if you you might

listen to Fox News and you might

yourself recognize that they're somewhat

extreme sometimes, you know, very one

one directional. But that doesn't mean

you're extreme. This is just normal.

This is the way media works today. This

is the way social media works. The

extreme gets the attention. That's the

way the algos work. So that's what

algos, that's what creators uh and and

that's what these media stations cater

to. That's the mainstream way. That

doesn't make you extreme. However, if

you are really solidly on the far right

or or even just really solidly deep in

the right or deep into the left, you

fail to recognize the perspectives of

the other side typically. So this Tyler

Robinson, if it is true that he was so

deeply ingrained in far-left ideology,

it is it it makes sociological sense

that he had no respect for the

perspectives of the people on the right,

disconnected from reality.

>> The suspect with another individual in

which he claimed that he had an

opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and

he was going to do it because of his

hatred for what Charlie stood for. That

are those are factually accurate.

>> Nobody reported that. That's insane. So

he told people he was going to take him

out. That's complicit. That person is

complicit in murder.

>> Investigatory findings by the FBI that

we've handed over to the local

authorities and the federal authorities

to make their prosecutorial decisions.

But I believe in this instance of such

public importance, the public has a

right to know. And I've told you I'm

committed to transparency. And that's

what I'm doing here today.

>> Why Why didn't that person that he was

talking to, why didn't that person say

something?

>> Yeah, exactly.

Um, you know, our investigation is

ongoing. That's a great question and and

we don't have an answer on that just

yet.

>> But Mr. Director, you're right. Your job

is not to speak to ideology, but you do

have the BAU, the behavior analysis unit

that are there. And my sources, people

that are within the bureau and outside

that used to be FBI,

>> tell me that the BAU has been encouraged

not to tackle the transgender issue from

an ideology standpoint. Have you heard

that? Are you tackling that? I know

you've only been there recently, but you

can't have a political slant saying

we're not going to attack different

political ideologies because it's going

to offend someone.

>> You're absolutely right. And that's why

we, me and the deputy, have been

quarterbacking this investigation

ourselves. There is no one at the FBI

that is going to politicize this

investigation. There's no one at

Quantico or anywhere else that is going

to say we are not looking at X or Y. We

are looking at the facts and that is why

we are releasing the facts in record.

>> I actually I do appreciate them

releasing this info right away. You

know, I'm just also at the same time

looking here like yeah, here's an

article influencers on right and left

dealing with doubts and fears about

security and stuff. You know, Ben

Shapiro did this whole like marketing

pitch. let's be real and call it what it

is. He did this whole pitch about like

we're not going to cancel events on

colleges. We're going to we're going to

go to colleges, you know, f these people

trying to cause fear. And that's great

messaging. On one hand, that's

fantastic. It's like, you know what?

Good for you, Ben Shapiro. Stand up for

the American rights to free speech and

don't be, you know, don't cower away.

But last Wednesday, they also literally

cancelled a Ben Shapiro event in Seami

Valley, California, which is like 40

minutes from me. And uh they canled it

after the shooting. So, it's kind of

like on one hand you're like, "Oh, we're

not going to cancel our tour." On the

other hand, you're canceling. Like,

there's just a lot of doubt right now

going on with security. And then I think

probably the lessons that you learn from

this and the Trump shooting is you just

can't do outdoor events. It's sad

because in an indoor environment, you

could security screen and and you know,

you could actually conduct proper

security, which you just can't do as

well on these outdoor events.

>> Fashion. If you go back and look at

historical cases like Luigi Manion and

the Boston bombing, how long did it take

the bureau to release information to the

public? We're not doing that. Those two

manhunts took 5 days and they happened

in downtown major metropolises. We

apprehended our suspect in 33 hours

because we were transparent and open

with the American public and we're going

to continue to do that. So, anyone that

thinks that the FBI

>> Oh, by the way, just adding to this

family talk because I've been talking

about this. Here's a piece literally as

well. The governor of Utah, Spencer Cox

of Utah, provided new information on um

on Tyler Robinson, saying there was

clearly a leftist ideology with this

with uh this assassin. He said, citing

the suspect's family and romantic

partner. We continue to get more

confirmation that this person that he

was living with was a romantic partner.

>> Is not on top of its game. and that me

and the deputy and everybody in

leadership in our Salt Lake City field

office in Quantico is doing anything

politically, I'm not having it. And if

you've hearing anything else about it,

they are lying to you. We're on it.

>> That's why it's so important that you

came on and we're we're thrilled you

are. Couple other things. Um I have a

two quick questions. One, is it true the

what the governor said yesterday that he

had a written note uh that you're

looking into now prior to the

assassination? You look, did he have a

note? And with the other one question is

the person that that was texting with

him about I have a shot of taking out

Charlie Kirk. Can that person be

charged?

>> Yes.

>> So, I'll take those in reverse. The

charging decisions are up to our great

partners at the Department of Justice

and the Attorney General who have been

wonderful providing resources during

this entire process. And we'll let them

speak to any charging decisions. But we,

the FBI, are investigating. As I said,

our investigation is ongoing. We're

interviewing dozens and dozens of

suspects, subjects, witnesses, and the

like, and continuing to examine forensic

information, including cell phone data

and DNA analyses. And once we make those

findings uh handed over to our our

partners, as we're doing in real time,

they'll make those decisions. And uh I'm

sorry, Brian, I forgot your other

question.

>> You had a written note. Was there Did he

write a written note before uh before

the assassination attempt? That's what

the governor said yesterday. And what

did that say, if you could say?

>> So, what I'm able to say I'm sorry. So,

what I was what I'm able to say is I I I

addressed it partially earlier is that

the written note we believe what did

exist and we have evidence to show what

was in that note which is um and I'm

going to uh summarize basically saying I

the suspect wrote a note saying I have

the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk

and I'm going to take it. That note was

written before the shooting. Um,

evidence of existence we now have

learned existed before the shooting was

in the location um in the suspect and

partner's home. But we have since

learned that the note, even though it

has been destroyed, we have found

forensic evidence of the note. Wait,

wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait,

wait, wait, wait. That's huge. That

means the partner may have seen or known

this was going to happen.

Said nothing, which means complicit.

Maybe maybe he didn't know about the

note, right? But like what if there was

a note like at the coffee machine or the

refrigerator like I'm going to take out

Kirk today and the guy didn't say

anything. You know, that means he shares

uh especially if he is trans that means

his partner shares the sentiment of

anti- Charlie Kirk and basically

is complicit. He should be charged and

arrested as well. Now, I know right now

he's cooperating with the FBI probably

because he's fearful that if he doesn't,

he's going to get bagged. And frankly,

whether he does or doesn't, he probably

will if he knew that note existed. And

the fact that then the note was

destroyed which then then sends a signal

of like whoa why would you destroy it if

you didn't know about it beforehand you

know and and now cash Patel telling us

oh you know we were able to piece it

back together or whatever

this story is getting crazy

>> and we have confirmed what that note

says because of our aggressive interview

posture at the FBI. Somebody here saying

uh uh the partner groomed this kid. It's

possible that that the if that partner

was trans and that partner has the

mental health issues we described

yesterday in my video detailing trans

mental health issues that he ended up

taking advantage of Tyler Robinson uh to

basically be the perpetrator. Like it's

like the worst kind of trans shooter.

It's the trans shooter who motivates

somebody else to be the shooter or

manipulates somebody else to be the

shooter. We don't know that. That's

speculation. Okay. is speculation. We

don't know. The partner could be

innocent. He could have known she I

don't know what the hell to call him.

Could have known nothing.

>> So m Mr. Director, I'm curious and there

there has been some criticism. So I

appreciate you coming on our program and

discussing it with our audience. Can you

tell us what was happening on the

ground? Apparently, according to

sources, you weren't getting

>> Somebody in the chat says, "Why are you

pushing the blame to the partner?" I'm

not pushing the blame to the partner. I

want to be crystal clear about that. I'm

saying the partner may be complicit in

not preventing this, therefore enabling

the murder. And I'm saying that there is

a possibility, and that's not shifting

blade. I'm saying there is a possibility

that the actions of the partner

manipulated the evil, vile actions of

Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson still

holds the bag. He's still the trigger

puller. He's the actor, right? He's

still the assassin.

But outside influences can certainly be

uh liable for that manipulation or or at

least the inducement to push somebody

over to the edge to actually do it. You

know, especially there's so much talk on

social media about like oh you know you

know grow a pair, have some balls, like

you got to be strong, you got to fight

for what you believe in. Remember in the

research we studied yesterday, there is

a disassociation with reality where the

FBI reports that people who have these

mental illnesses, they believe they are

morally superior and they don't

recognize consequences for themselves

because they justify their own actions

with their own moral superiority that

they imagine

>> some information. You requested photos

and you were being stonewalled. Now, I

think it's important to know there's

always some sort of tension between

local cops on the ground and the feds.

They want to handle their own

investigation. But of course, with an

investigation of this magnitude, you

have to step in. You have the resources.

But can you explain? Was it the local

field office? Was it the state police?

What was going on?

>> Uh, somebody says, "Where are the

official pictures of the engraved

bullets?" Yeah, the FBI has not released

those yet. And uh

Steve Crowder got subpoenaed by the ATF

for leaking that they even had these uh

uh the evidence of these these inscri

inscribed bullets. Uh a subpoena,

remember, is just a request for

information. It's probably like, "How

the hell did you get our internal memo

notes?"

Fair. Okay. Fair for the FBI or the ATF

to subpoena over that.

>> So, the local authorities have been

fantastic. Okay.

>> Uh the local sheriff, the state PD have

been wonderful. And any investigation,

as you hinted to, of this magnitude has

so many people in it because I'd made

the decision to surge so many resources

and to get the information up to me was

of the utmost priority. So I worked with

my team to say, "Hey, there's not going

to be any delays. We're not going to do

it the way we normally do things." So

the only thing that people were doing at

the FBI was how they knew how to do

things. I had to expedite that process.

That's my job. That's what I thought

this case deserved and that's what this

case was uh rightly calling for. So I

made the tough calls. Um but I wasn't

critical of anyone in particular. I just

said we got to move faster and that was

my call to make and if there's any

criticism there you can put it right

here.

>> Who wasn't giving you information

director who wasn't giving you the

photos when you requested them speak uh

uh quickly and it didn't it didn't make

it to you? Who who denied that order?

It's not a denial of the order. Just to

clarify, I'm glad we're talking about

this. The uh the photos were produced.

They just weren't produced in a timely

fashion that I felt was appropriate for

an investigation of this magnitude. So,

I came in and I accelerated that

process.

>> Right.

>> So, in the 24 hours after when we were

still looking for the guy,

>> I don't love Cash Patel either, but and

he's he's really shilling for like how

great the FBI is now under him and

stuff. There's a lot of shilling going

on here, but he is dropping some notes

that are very interesting

>> about it. And what do you have to say

about the criticism?

>> Mind you, in case you're new here, I

hate like my goal is to be hated by

everyone. I love everyone. My goal is to

be hated by everybody, though, because

it just keeps me neutral.

>> So, I'm sorry if I'm offending anyone.

>> No, I appreciate this opportunity. Look,

as I stated, I was being transparent

with working with the public on our

findings as I had them. I stated in that

message that we had a subject and uh

that we were going to interview him and

we did and he was released. The job of

the FBI is not just to manhunt the

actual suspect who did the killing or

suspects, but it's also to eliminate

targets and eliminate subjects who are

not involved in the process. And that's

what we were doing. Could I have worded

it a little better in the heat of the

moment? Sure. But do I regret putting it

out? Absolutely not. I was telling the

world what the FBI was doing as we were

doing. And I'm continuing to do that.

And I challenge anyone out there to find

a director that has been more

transparent and more willing to work the

media.

>> This is basically the end of the

interview. This is This is huge though.

DNA evidence, more insights on the

partner, evidence on the notes, uh

potential complicit charges to come. Uh

you know, some more info on the

inscripted bullets, the leftist

ideology, the conservative uprising, the

mental health challenges that

potentially are a factor here. Again, we

still don't have facts on drugs or the

trans partner or even confirmation of

that, although that seems to be pretty

consistent at this point. This is a lot

of extra detail on the Charlie Kirk

shooting.

>> Why not advertise these things that you

told us here? I feel like nobody else

knows about this.

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

see how it goes.

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

much. People love you. People look up to

you.

>> Kevin Praath there, financial analyst

and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great

to get your take.