TRANSCRIPTEnglish

"Trump is going to JAIL" [My Response]

10m 5s1,671 words243 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

recently there's been talk about Donald

0:02

Trump getting himself thrown into jail

0:04

and there's a David packing piece that

0:07

actually puts This Together pretty well

0:09

I wanted to add some commentary on this

0:11

and and share sort of my thoughts on How

0:14

likely I think this is and uh give some

0:16

thoughts on to specifically this but

0:18

let's first listen to David here and

0:21

then we'll give some reaction to it here

0:23

we go detention what is going on here

0:27

listen to this yesterday we spoke about

0:31

Donald Trump's threats being made yes to

0:35

the special prosecutor Jack Smith but

0:38

more generally to uh people who are

0:41

involved in one way or another with

0:44

Trump's prosecution and Trump was told

0:46

not to communicate with Witnesses which

0:49

he is now doing through social media in

0:52

multiple ways let's remind ourselves of

0:54

what was said Donald Trump posting to

0:57

truth social in all capital letters vote

1:00

if you go after me

1:03

I'm coming after you

1:05

keep in mind where we're going with this

1:08

is implying that Donald Trump making

1:11

these these arguments on Truth social or

1:14

otherwise is somehow going to land him

1:15

in jail because you know a judge

1:17

basically told him don't threaten anyone

1:19

uh personally I think that's highly

1:22

unlikely and a lot of what Donald Trump

1:24

is saying is uh in my opinion a way of

1:27

sort of rallying his base right it's a

1:30

way of motivating people to vote and be

1:33

engaged in the election not as a direct

1:35

threat uh that's not to say that Donald

1:39

Trump doesn't engage obviously in like

1:41

legal activities or lawsuits but

1:44

generally courts don't look at lawsuits

1:46

as ways of threats or harassments unless

1:50

you have a frivolous lawsuit in which

1:51

case that gets thrown out but you know

1:53

arguing you know

1:55

something as what we just saw if you go

1:56

after me I'm coming after you I think

1:58

it's probably a stretch to call this you

2:00

know something that's going to throw

2:01

Donald Trump in jail but you should see

2:03

the basis of the argument because these

2:07

sorts of ideas are getting a lot of

2:08

attention right now and people are

2:10

suggesting that hey maybe Donald Trump

2:11

could end up going to jail and he'll end

2:13

up getting uh instead of a jail cell

2:15

some kind of private jail like uh you

2:17

know Martha Stewart's out of jail or

2:19

maybe detention on morological or

2:21

they'll build a prison for him and those

2:24

walls will be built faster than his wall

2:26

between America and Mexico and the

2:28

American taxpayer will pay for this one

2:31

there's so much drama going on let's

2:33

just listen to a little bit more here as

2:34

I told you yesterday this led to the

2:36

Department of Justice filing for a

2:38

protective order there was an initial

2:40

timeline for that Trump asked for an

2:43

extension the judge said no and we're

2:45

still figuring out how that's going to

2:46

finally get adjudicated in the meantime

2:49

Donald Trump went back on Truth social

2:53

and this time talked about Mike Pence

2:56

posting quote wow it's finally happened

2:59

little Mike Pence a man who was about to

3:01

be ousted as governor of Indiana until I

3:03

came along and made him VP has gone to

3:06

the dark side I never told a newly

3:08

emboldened not based on his two percent

3:10

poll numbers Pence to put me above the

3:12

Constitution or that Mike was too honest

3:15

he's delusional and now he wants to show

3:18

he's a tough guy I want this by the way

3:20

is because there were some uh reports

3:23

that came out that Donald Trump said oh

3:25

Pence is too honest and this all has to

3:28

do with uh basically j6 right Donald

3:31

Trump encouraging Mike Pence not to

3:34

certify the results of the election uh

3:36

which obviously j6 sought to interrupt I

3:40

covered j6 live uh in you know and now

3:43

uh archived live stream that's still

3:45

available by the way just type into

3:46

YouTube meet Kevin January 6 Riot or

3:49

Insurrection I can't remember what the

3:50

title is and it's a 10 hour live stream

3:52

where we we basically watched everything

3:55

unfold it's almost like it's own little

3:57

documentary if you look at the time

3:59

stamps but uh you know Pence obviously

4:02

went on to certify the results of the

4:03

election despite uh expectations that

4:06

maybe he would listen to Trump but not

4:08

certify the results of the election but

4:09

anyway we'll keep going with this truth

4:11

social post once read a major magazine

4:13

article on Mike it said he was not a

4:15

very good person I was surprised but the

4:18

article was right sad this is related to

4:22

reports that Pence's testimony might be

4:24

a big factor in Trump's trials an

4:26

article I just showed you in the last

4:28

segment this goes directly counter to

4:32

what the judge told Trump to do as far

4:35

as the pre-trial conditions The

4:37

Washington Post has an extensive article

4:39

about what happened in the courtroom

4:41

last week and it says quote next the

4:45

judge tells Trump he may not communicate

4:48

with any witness about the facts of the

4:51

case without an attorney present quote

4:55

from the judge now I want to remind you

4:57

it is a crime to intimidate a witness or

5:01

retaliate against anyone for providing

5:05

information about your case to the

5:06

prosecution or otherwise obstruct

5:08

Justice do you understand These Warnings

5:11

sir and Trump nodded uh that but he

5:15

didn't say anything which led to the

5:16

judge to say

5:18

having heard these conditions are you

5:20

prepared to comply with them

5:23

Trump stands right hand in the air

5:25

agrees to comply with the conditions of

5:29

release Trump is directly violating that

5:33

instruction here

5:35

Trump is responding to Mike Pence on the

5:39

basis of Mike Pence's believed previous

5:42

and potential future participation in

5:45

this case as a witness this is arguably

5:48

a form of communicating with Witnesses

5:50

and I would argue even attempting to

5:53

tamper with them or influence them and

5:55

all right so that's Dave Pacman's

5:58

argument obviously we know Dave Pac-Man

6:00

I actually I enjoy his videos I think we

6:02

know Nick Pacman leans on the left uh

6:06

compared to conservative talk shows uh

6:08

would obviously right Point here is not

6:11

to point bias it's to suggest that I

6:14

think the argument that you know a judge

6:17

saying hey look you're not allowed to

6:18

talk to any Witnesses without an

6:21

attorney present is pretty easily

6:23

countered by Donald Trump simply

6:25

suggesting

6:27

I've always got an attorney present

6:29

which reality is is true the argument

6:33

that I made months ago was that Donald

6:35

Trump would really use campaign funds to

6:39

make sure that he's always as illegally

6:42

equipped as need be Donald Trump has

6:45

previously made the argument that he

6:47

would only use one penny out of every

6:50

dollar raised towards a legal funding

6:52

that has since been revised to 90 cents

6:56

going towards campaign funds 10 cents

6:59

going towards Donald Trump's legal

7:01

battles Donald Trump's campaign is in

7:04

effect one way to subsidize the legal

7:07

bag he would be held with if he were not

7:10

running for office imagine this for a

7:12

moment like Trump or not imagine this

7:14

for a moment if Donald Trump did not run

7:16

for office he would still be left with

7:19

the legal bag of all of the costs of his

7:22

legal battles from his last

7:25

Administration and and subsequent

7:28

campaign well if now you run for

7:31

president at least you have a way of

7:33

compensating for some of those past

7:35

legal actions which otherwise you

7:37

wouldn't have had but this is no

7:38

surprise do I think that Donald Trump is

7:41

going to somehow be pre-trial detained

7:45

because he's shouting on social media no

7:48

because I think that if the judge

7:50

actually expected to restrain Donald

7:54

Trump's speech on social media the judge

7:58

would have specifically said Donald

8:00

Trump you frequently complain on social

8:02

media or at your rallies about your

8:04

opponents if you do that again you're in

8:07

violation of this Corridor that's very

8:09

different from witness intimidation

8:11

intimidation or witness tampering and so

8:14

I think the Judge very clearly worded

8:17

this to make sure they would not have to

8:20

throw Donald Trump in jail because of

8:22

some you know pre-trial commentary

8:24

everybody knows Donald Trump is going to

8:27

be a loose cannon at his round please

8:29

and on Truth social and quite frankly

8:31

that's just part of the entertainment of

8:33

it all so no I do not personally think

8:35

there is a chance in how Donald Trump

8:37

gets thrown into jail certainly not in a

8:39

pre-trial detention measure or on some

8:41

form of Flight Risk argument is there a

8:44

chance obviously after the outcome of

8:46

all these cases of course there is but

8:48

pray I don't think so uh that's uh

8:51

that's one of my takes so uh that's my

8:54

response to will Donald Trump be thrown

8:56

into jail

8:58

okay

9:00

so okay somebody here is responding

9:03

saying so is yelling fire in a crowded

9:05

theater theater okay that's very

9:07

different from this you know like you

9:10

have to you have to I mean it's a fair

9:11

question but let's set it up fairly

9:13

let's say you went into a movie theater

9:17

and every single day there was a dude at

9:21

the bottom of theater yelling fire or

9:23

fire you know people would show up at

9:26

the movie theater to watch the person

9:29

yelling fire because maybe they like the

9:31

person or they think it's a funny show

9:34

but they wouldn't be thinking there's

9:36

actually a fire right so like I think

9:39

you have to frame that analogy better

9:41

now I want you to know this when it

9:42

comes to AI

9:44

time is what's going to make you money

9:46

and if you can prove that value to an

9:49

employer you'll always be able to be

9:52

employed so this is another way of

9:54

making sure that you don't get replaced

9:56

by artificial intelligence if you can

9:58

Master AI by starting on the ground

10:00

floor

10:01

let's go

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.