TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Fed Meeting was NOT What Bulls Wanted [Jackson Hole Jerome Powell]

14m 19s2,390 words346 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

we got the 12 months of inflation

0:01

declines we got the higher only if

0:05

inflation uh goes higher this was a lot

0:08

of the could talk that we got from j-pal

0:10

we got the restricted for six months we

0:13

got expectations are anchored we got

0:15

positive real rates we got uh jobs

0:18

getting into balance but I had that

0:21

written as imbalance uh I uh as supplies

0:25

getting into balance we did not hear

0:27

anything about banking no green span no

0:29

volcker uh didn't warn about loosening

0:32

prematurely oh we got that that's great

0:35

that's actually great let me let me

0:37

double check that uh because we have the

0:39

transcript here uh and uh I just want to

0:43

see the word premature really quickly

0:45

because uh maybe did he mention that

0:47

because if he didn't mention that he

0:49

didn't mention that oh that's really

0:52

good why not advertise these things that

0:55

you told us here I feel like nobody else

0:56

knows about this we'll try a little

0:58

advertising and see how it goes

0:59

congratulations since man you have done

1:01

so much people love you people look up

1:02

to you Kevin financial analyst and

1:05

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

1:07

your take

1:08

the word prematurely was not used that's

1:11

a big deal I actually like that a lot

1:14

okay good so let's add that to the bingo

1:17

card that he didn't mention uh warning

1:19

against prematurely loosening uh he did

1:22

not invoke Paul volcker didn't invoke

1:24

Greenspan didn't invoke fate didn't tell

1:27

us about unemployment potentially being

1:29

uh you know uh like uh you know what

1:33

what level would be unacceptable to them

1:35

we didn't get that uh so there are some

1:37

things we didn't really get here uh you

1:40

know this I would probably give us this

1:42

too early to call Peak but maybe they're

1:45

very dependent on the data here so this

1:47

is kind of my bingo card you know you

1:49

can compare it to what you did but uh

1:51

let me let me give sort of an overall

1:52

view here uh I would say this is this

1:56

was a very neutral Powell uh he didn't

1:59

really

2:00

you know he didn't he certainly didn't

2:02

Pummel us like last year right last year

2:05

was a complete pummeling because he's

2:06

like we're not even restrictive yet we

2:08

got a long freaking way to go this time

2:11

he's telling us look we're we're getting

2:13

there but things could break uh and

2:17

that's really important this idea that

2:19

things could break in fact he

2:22

specifically emphasized the word could

2:26

uh multiple times actually uh so uh that

2:31

was sort of his way of conditioning I

2:32

think Mark it's to say look we have no

2:35

idea when he emphasized could a couple

2:38

of times take a look at where those are

2:40

and I'll show you where he says we have

2:41

no idea we expect this labor market

2:43

rebalancing to continue evidence that

2:45

this tightness in the labor market is no

2:47

longer easing could call for a monetary

2:50

response we don't have that evidence

2:52

that it's not easing but it could happen

2:56

so that code was a really important one

2:58

here was another one additional evidence

3:01

of persistently above Trend growth could

3:04

put further progress on inflation risk

3:07

and could warrant further tightening but

3:11

not necessarily look at the Double

3:13

conditional here he's basically saying

3:15

look just because we have above Trend

3:17

growth only matters if it affects

3:21

inflation actually if you go back to the

3:24

bingo card on the bingo card I think we

3:27

actually had exactly that let me see

3:29

where that was uh there there there it's

3:33

that one oh hold on it's black that one

3:35

the bottom left corner demand above

3:38

Trend may be acceptable as long as

3:41

inflation doesn't you know on anchor

3:45

right so I'm actually going to put a

3:47

check in that he didn't exactly say that

3:49

but that double condition in my opinion

3:51

is exactly what he meant so as a Fed

3:54

Watcher that that's a check mark for me

3:57

I'm gonna go back to the the sheet now

3:59

let's keep looking at what he said with

4:00

could so that double conditional right

4:03

there that's saying we might be okay

4:05

with above Trend growth look if the

4:07

economy is booming and inflation's down

4:09

we're not here to say that can't happen

4:12

uh equivalent rents uh okay well that

4:15

talks about that wasn't an important

4:16

could that's right and highlight it okay

4:19

talked about that that's the labor

4:21

market rebalancing okay here doing too

4:23

little could allow inflation uh to

4:25

become entrenched right this this

4:27

entrenching this has to do with

4:30

expectations and ultimately right could

4:33

require monetary policy to be higher

4:36

basically uh okay fine so a lot of

4:38

conditionals here right but notice this

4:41

is a very different tone this isn't a

4:43

j-pal that's telling us we we will go

4:46

higher

4:47

he's saying look if crap comes in bad we

4:52

could do more in fact uh we did just get

4:55

the University of Michigan sentiment

4:57

data uh we got sentiment that actually

4:59

declined a little bit to 69.5 the

5:01

expectation was 71.2 a one-year

5:04

inflation expectations actually ticked

5:06

up a bit 3.3 to 3.5 not great uh and the

5:10

five to ten year ticked up a tiny bit

5:11

from two nine to uh 3.0 both on

5:14

expectations and what we were before the

5:17

10-year treasury hasn't basically moved

5:19

at all it's basically flat uh markets

5:22

are still you know they're still

5:23

positive uh which is nice but a little

5:27

uncertain because people are trying to

5:29

digest this fed talk here and this was

5:31

this was not Victory we did not expect a

5:34

victory speech uh we expected this sort

5:37

of conditional optimism and that's what

5:39

we got now I want to show you this one

5:41

line that he says because it's pretty

5:43

remarkable so buckle up for this one

5:45

line that he says uh quick shout out

5:47

though obviously if you want to support

5:49

the channel you want to invest in house

5:51

hack make sure your course member sign

5:53

up for the courses linked down below

5:55

last time we raised money eighty percent

5:58

think about this of the 27 million

6:00

dollars house act raised over 80 percent

6:04

of the investors were course members so

6:07

consider that for a moment and that's

6:09

accredited investors uh so we are

6:13

expecting to have to basically just have

6:15

the offering be for course members only

6:16

so if you want to be in it check it out

6:18

check out the courses linked down below

6:20

but okay listen to this line right here

6:21

that we got from Jay Powell you ready

6:23

for this

6:25

conclusion I loved this line okay this

6:27

is hilarious

6:29

as is often the case we are navigating

6:32

by the stars under Cloudy Skies okay

6:36

that's impossible you can't navigate by

6:39

the Stars when you can't see the stars

6:43

he's literally saying look I was on the

6:47

schedule to give this speech I have

6:49

absolutely no idea what the he double

6:53

hockey sticks is gonna happen

6:55

things right now seem like they're okay

6:58

but there are some risks I thought this

7:01

was interesting it actually started

7:03

bearish he started bearish and I wrote

7:06

WTF on it when he said this uh because

7:09

there was this one part that was bearish

7:10

remember my goal is not to just feed you

7:13

one narrative I always want to give you

7:14

the good and the bad I really try my

7:16

best with that whether it's politics or

7:17

whatever look at this right here I

7:19

literally wrote what the f

7:22

so he's like hey on a 12-month basis

7:25

core pce inflation peaked and has

7:28

gradually declined uh you know basically

7:31

all the way through July uh and uh and

7:35

then he says lower core inflation

7:37

readings in June and July were welcome

7:38

but that's only two months of good data

7:41

and I'm like bro what are you smoking

7:43

it's been like a year of good data so I

7:45

I thought this was this was a way of him

7:47

kind of like trying to inject that

7:50

balance right I kind of think he had to

7:52

put some bad in with some good so that

7:56

it's not all good because he's trying to

7:59

Signal a uh it could go either way and

8:04

we have no idea that's basically what he

8:06

said here but again this is a world of a

8:08

difference from last year remember what

8:11

we heard last year last year we

8:14

literally heard him say

8:16

the historical record warns against

8:18

premature loosening he did not say that

8:21

we have to force demand and Supply into

8:25

balance didn't say that this time he

8:27

actually said hey if demand essentially

8:30

is continuing to go up uh we could raise

8:33

rates if inflation on anchors in other

8:35

words if inflation doesn't on anchor it

8:37

could be okay that demand goes up that's

8:39

impressive uh the labor market is

8:42

clearly strong devolved it devolved into

8:46

well the labor market is definitely

8:49

coming into more balance but there's

8:50

still some work to do

8:52

and that could change but it's trending

8:55

in the right direction

8:56

uh

8:57

last year he said we need to be

8:59

restrictive for some time this year he's

9:01

like we've been restricted for some time

9:05

uh uh well anchored inflation

9:07

expectations of course that's almost a

9:09

default check mark uh no no volcker

9:13

mentions this time

9:14

and uh and he didn't there was one thing

9:18

he mentioned last year which was

9:20

rational inattention so last year the

9:23

talk rational oopsies I'm trying to

9:26

those are my notes hold on uh what did I

9:28

do wrong here and that button okay there

9:30

we go okay uh what was I say okay

9:32

rational inattention is basically uh

9:36

inflation is uh is if inflation is

9:39

stable people don't care about inflation

9:42

like businesses and people don't plan

9:45

for inflation when inflation is stable

9:47

so they're not really worried about it

9:49

when inflation is unstable that's when

9:51

people are freaked out by inflation and

9:55

then they start pricing in more

9:57

inflation and they're worried about more

9:59

inflation so a bottom line out of all of

10:02

this to me bottom line out of the whole

10:04

kicking caboodle here is this was a

10:06

cautious fed he does not want to create

10:09

a stock market rally but he's not trying

10:11

to create a stock market crash last year

10:14

he's like

10:15

bend over

10:17

yeah so this is nowhere close to Victory

10:21

it is a neutral towel uh and I want to

10:24

see how the rate Market

10:27

uh is pricing in expectations we were

10:30

like at a 10 chance of a hike and the

10:32

next one

10:33

uh and let's see where we sit now

10:38

so we are sitting at a 20 chance of a

10:42

hike but that's been stable for

10:44

basically this week last week we're at

10:47

10 if we look at the five-year forward

10:50

break even it's again trending down uh

10:54

it's sitting at a 5.8 or sorry 2.35 the

10:58

uh five-year Break Even is sitting at

11:01

2.26

11:04

and

11:07

yeah

11:08

that's looking good so I'd call it

11:11

stable and as far as what Wall Street is

11:16

saying

11:17

uh the upcoming meetings we're in a

11:19

position to proceed carefully this is

11:20

just basically a way saying hey like we

11:23

might end up

11:24

uh pausing uh We're not gonna look for

11:27

our star we really have no idea where

11:29

that is so we're gonna look for the

11:30

incoming data

11:32

uh no fireworks at Jackson Hole expected

11:35

by the options market and that's what we

11:38

got no fireworks we got a neutral fed

11:41

fed uh didn't Splash any cold water or

11:44

hot water on anyone very neutral just

11:47

reading what what the suits were

11:49

thinking yeah I mean roughly the same

11:52

thing that we summarized here so uh I

11:55

would say this is kind of a no news is

11:58

good news uh approach I'm satisfied with

12:01

this no news is good news is a way of

12:03

saying hey we didn't get reamed by him

12:06

today so this is where you kind of go

12:08

oh okay Dodge the potential bullet

12:11

that's it all right thank you so much

12:14

for being here check out those courses

12:16

on building your wealth linked down

12:18

below oh wait wait is there a new Nick T

12:20

piece hold on hold on there's a Nick T

12:22

let's see what Nick T has to say really

12:23

quick uh I imagine it's going to be

12:26

relatively similar but let's see what he

12:28

has

12:29

uh J Powell's word of the day carefully

12:33

it was a risk management speech okay

12:36

well that's the same thing I said are

12:38

you watching my video okay it's not the

12:39

same thing I said I know I know as

12:41

expected Powell rejects the idea that

12:43

inflation Target would change well duh

12:45

that's not that's I mean nobody that's

12:47

nonsense that doesn't matter risk

12:49

management speech uh fad chair notes

12:52

economy hasn't cooled as expected that's

12:55

demand coming down right uh and says

12:58

signs of strength could warrant more

13:00

action right

13:02

could not will

13:04

very important Nick T literally put the

13:07

word could in the byline of his article

13:09

because we agree that was very very

13:11

important

13:13

uh let's see here yeah Nick T also

13:16

picked up on the two months of good data

13:18

or only the beginning I thought that was

13:21

weird that was the what the f that I

13:22

wrote down right so we picked up on the

13:24

same thing pal echoed some of the themes

13:27

in a more nuanced speech on Friday

13:28

explicitly rejected the idea about

13:30

changing two percent that's not a big

13:31

deal we don't know what the neutral rate

13:33

is that's not a big deal uh

13:36

Powell's speech Illustrated how he's

13:38

trying to thread the needle between

13:40

slowing hiring investment and spending

13:42

to bring inflation down without

13:43

providing so much restraint that it

13:45

would needlessly severely uh damage the

13:48

economy yep

13:51

call whoever said that in in the video

13:53

or in the chat here so I appreciate you

13:55

okay awesome again uh cautious

13:59

cautious optimism that's what I call it

14:01

alright folks appreciate you being here

14:03

thank you so much this is the first time

14:05

I've done a Fed meeting on Tick Tock uh

14:09

Twitter video Twitter spaces

14:11

twitch and YouTube

14:15

all right folks we'll see you goodbye

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.