I JUST Sued CNN over Censoring the Trump vs Biden Debate.

we have just filed a lawsuit against CNN

for their unamerican censorship of

Independent Media outlets on a very

historic night the Trump versus Joe

Biden presidential debate it is

currently 112 a.m. on the morning of the

debate we have just finished compiling

our lawsuit and we are seeking an

emergency injunction to make sure you

get Fair access to commentary

about this debate CNN right now desires

unchecked power to control 50% of the

presidential debates we're expecting to

get in the 2024 election it's a nasty

power grab and

unfortunately CNN might get away with it

unless we stop them this is not about

left versus right this isn't about a

Democrat or

Republican this is about America and CNN

being

anti-democratic

anti-American that's why again just

moments ago we filed a substantial

lawsuit against CNN and we're asking for

your help we're hoping you could share

this and let anybody you know know that

there is now a lawsuit against CNN and

all we're asking is that they allow

independent journalists and anybody who

wants to comment on the debate live

stream to allow them to exercise their

first amendment privilege to comment and

to provide insight to anybody who wants

so that way if you want to flip between

CNN or Fox and you want to hear Fox

commentary during the debate you can do

that you want to flip over to listen to

my buddy Tim Po or my friends over at

breaking points you want to listen to

Patrick B David or you want to listen to

what Kevin has to say during the debate

or you want to flip between all of us

while we're streaming the debate you

would be able to if we can get the

injunction we need we're filing this

lawsuit to get an emergency hearing

we're not asking for money we're just

asking for your help in getting the word

out so that way we can hopefully

hopefully get a federal court to look at

our injunction request and Grant it

before the debate we've got to move fast

so right now before we get into some of

the details of the lawsuit if you can

hit like retweet post it on Facebook

whatever you got to do for the algorithm

help us out on this one you know that

you stand for free

speech I stand for free speech and we're

just here to fight the good fight to

make sure free speech and independent

journalists are allowed to comment on

the debate this doesn't just affect me

it affects everyone neutral Left Right

Center it does not matter and we're not

asking for a dime from anyone there's no

GoFundMe this is lawsuit this entire

lawsuit is on us we'll fight it and

we'll pay for it it's just the right

thing to do so here's the Crux of the

issue for the first time since 1988 CNN

will be hosting its own presidential

debate without the oversight of the

nonpartisan group called the commission

on presidential debates that Commission

in a nonpartisan way helps set rules

they pick moderators they ensure the

debate is fair and they ensure that

practices during the debate are fair not

just for commenters outside the debate

but the way the debate is structured as

well but for some reason CNN decided not

to follow something that we've been

doing for over 30 years coming up on 40

instead CNN's hosting just one of the

two presidential debates we're having so

about 50% and it's somewhat weird that

it's happening 131 days before the

election which is quite unusually early

but it has the potential to really sway

political discourse over the next few

months until the next debate see CNN is

only allowing certain other companies to

broadcast the live stream of the debate

but even those companies like let's say

fox or NBC even they are not allowed to

comment on the debate during the debate

no one who streams the debate is allowed

to comment this is crazy if somebody

says something crazy or somebody wants

to throw in a quick fact check like hey

here's a quick you know by the way it's

25% instead of 15% whatever the number

is and a quick little fact you throw

some data up on the screen it just helps

people during the most critical time

when the debate happens I expect that

people are going to be together with

their families their friends they're

going to watch the debate and the best

time to get commentary is during the

actual debate in those low moments when

the moderators yapping about rules or in

the commercial breaks those are great

times or even quickly if somebody says

something outrageous to fact check it

during the debate is the most important

moment to get fact checks and commentary

out there for those who want it at least

let people have the option if somebody

wants a stream with zero commentary at

all go watch it on CNN but people

deserve the right to have their choice

of

commentator this is so unamerican to

strip the First Amendment rights that we

have to free

speech no independent journalists or

YouTubers are being allowed to stream

the debate in fact some have even

alleged that CNN is trying to go as far

as forcing YouTube to take downstreams

of the debate when independent

journalists have reached out like

breaking points or Tim poool they've

either been disallowed from streaming or

have just been straight up rejected from

CNN on top of this CNN wants the right

to no studio audience and have the

ability to mute candidates mics so

literally CNN has complete control they

could silence Trump or Biden so mostly

Trump whenever they want at their whim

and nobody else in the audience because

there is nobody in the audience could

hear what they're

saying to broadcast it we we totally at

CNN's whim and it's really important

that commenters especially with those

sort of rules are able to go oh it looks

like you know someone's trying to

dispute with this maybe we could try to

somewhat hear what he's saying you know

or read his lips or something I I don't

know it's crazy I don't think we've ever

seen this technology of muting mics

before I mean I get it they're trying to

have it attempted maybe to make it a

little bit more orderly but part of what

makes debates alive is the respect or

lack of respect the candidates show

towards each other that's part of the

qualification

process so to me this is all extremely

scary it's unpatriotic and it doesn't

help people feel that our elections are

trustworthy this hurts election

Integrity this is unamerican It's

censorship it's corporate

discrimination it violates the Sherman

Anti-Trust Act it violates the rules of

the Federal Communication commission it

violates the principles and doctrines of

fair use it's

anti-American it violates one of the

most important days in history a night

where Americans will evaluate or start

evaluating who will lead our country in

the next four

years this will drive all presidential

discussion for the next months and it's

critically

important so we're not asking for

anything more than the right to during

the

stream share the restream while adding

transformative commentary that's all

we're asking we just want to be able to

add our commentary to the

stream it's very simple we've done it

for decades can we almost say that on

YouTube now decades

all I certainly did during January 6th

streamed live for 10 hours that day

covered Trump's speech into everything

else that happened that day because

that's what we

do Americans all around the country have

become

accustom to getting perspective from

commentators and substantially fewer

people watch commentary after the fact

so what I encourage is sharing this and

making it known retweet this make sure

everybody knows we are suing CNN for

free speech and we're not going to stop

until we have it because if we don't

we're going to fall into communist ISM

now let's take a quick look at the

actual case this is the highlighted

version I will as soon as I can get it

make sure you have a link as a pinned

comment below or I'll put it somewhere

so that way you have access to the

actual filed lawsuit with the uh case

number once it gets assigned so uh we

are bringing this action for violations

of the Federal Trade Commission act the

Sherman Antitrust Act the public for

Doctrine the First Amendment and the

communications Act of

1934 for their refusal to allow others

to comment on the presidential debate

which we argue constitutes monopolistic

Behavior restricts public discourse and

violates the principle of Fair

competition and public interest

obviously as well the protections under

the fair use Doctrine so uh the case has

a lot of background we go into a lot of

detail for example we have this here

this is not the first time CNN has

restricted Mr af's freedom of

speech during the California

gubernatorial campaign for example we

had to send them a cease and deist

letter because they ran an article on

their homepage that there was nobody

challenging Gavin new some from the

governor's party and that was factually

false we were actually winning in the

polls at that point didn't win for

governor because the recall didn't end

up happening should have happened

oh well but anyway we were winning at

the poll we were beating Larry Elder in

the polls at that time anyway um we've

had some history with CNN and censorship

and so we argue that uh what they're

trying to do by silencing smaller

creators and smaller independent

journalists is they're trying to control

and contain The Narrative of this debate

to exactly what they want and so we

think this is Corporate a discrimination

an un fair business practice uh so we

call this unfair competition under the

Federal Trade Commission act uh we say

this is essentially stifling critical

commentary at the time of the debate

which is akin to censorship our second

claim is the violation of Anti-Trust

laws under the Sherman Antitrust Act and

one of the uh quotes that we use is from

Associated Press versus United States

the freedom to publish means a freedom

for all not for some

every person who shall monopolize or

attempt to monopolize any part of trade

or Commerce which news is trade it's

interstate trade uh among several States

shall be deemed guilty of a

felony the US Supreme Court has stated

there is substantial governmental and

First Amendment interest in promoting A

diversity of views provided through

multiple technology media keep in mind a

lot of these cases come from before even

the days of of the internet broadcasters

must operate in the public interest

that's under our fourth claim violation

of the communications Act of

1934 and then our fifth claim is

violation of public policy in addition

to of course the fair use

Doctrine well folks we certainly hope

that we can resolve this in an American

way we need True Justice to be served

share this message and let's make sure

independent journalists can have a voice

during the debate that's all we ask for

why not advertise these things that you

told us here I feel like nobody else

knows about this we'll we'll try a

little advertising and see how it goes

congratulations man you have done so

much people love you people look up to

you Kevin PA there financial analyst and

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

your

take even though I'm a licensed

financial adviser licensed real estate

broker and becoming a stock broker this

video is not personalized advice for you

it is not tax legal or otherwise

personalized advice tailored to you this

video provides generalized perspective

information and commentary any third

party content I show shall not be deemed

endorsed by me this video is not and

shall never be deemed reasonably

sufficient information for the purposes

of evaluating a security or investment

decision any links or promoted products

are either paid affiliations or products

or Services we may benefit from I also

personally operate an actively managed

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

hold long or short positions in various

Securities potentially including those

mentioned in this video however I have

no relationship to any issuer other than

house Haack nor am I presently acting as

a market maker make sure if you're

considering investing in house Haack to

always read the PPM at house.com