⚠️ Some features may be temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing 3rd party provider issue. We apologize for the inconvenience and expect this to be resolved soon.
TRANSCRIPTEnglish

What Cathie Wood JUST Said (& My Reaction)

31m 17s5,388 words945 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

well um when when i first met vinay it

0:02

was at an etf conference where

0:04

i was or an arc was kind of a curiosity

0:07

it was in 2018

0:09

and nobody believed we would make it uh

0:12

everybody was curious how could an

0:14

active manager

0:16

uh work within an etf rapper that's for

0:19

passive it's fully transparent

0:21

but the nae believed that we were going

0:24

to be successful

0:26

and believed in our transparency our

0:28

active

0:29

our information flow and he's run with

0:32

that

0:33

with the tiffin companies uh very

0:35

focused on transparency

0:37

and bringing in intelligent access to

0:41

especially uh registered investment

0:44

advisors and institutional investors so

0:47

um we were intrigued with his business

0:49

or we have been intrigued

0:51

uh we've piloted some of his uh services

0:54

and have been very satisfied with the

0:56

result

0:58

so benay it brings us to you and what

1:00

you're trying to build

1:01

obviously there's a lot of money going

1:03

into fintech not just from venture

1:05

capital but some of the biggest banks

1:06

jpmorgan visa doing billion dollar deals

1:09

in the last few weeks

1:10

so i think of magnifier subsidiary as a

1:13

sort of google

1:14

for investments but you're expanding

1:16

into actually

1:17

selling the investment products talk

1:19

about what you're trying to build what

1:20

your vision is

1:22

yeah thank you sir for having me here

1:24

kathy thanks for joining as well

1:26

and you're absolutely right look fintech

1:28

investment has gone from

1:30

vc investment in fintech has gone from 4

1:32

billion in 2016

1:34

to 8 in 2018 to 35 billion last quarter

1:38

just in fintech a lot of this activity

1:40

has been largely focused on payments

1:42

lending new banking and what's happening

1:45

in the space of wealth and investments

1:47

is still

1:48

new and still mason so tiffin we think

1:51

is part of the solution

1:52

we are a platform that really builds

1:55

fintech products for the world of

1:56

investment and wealth management

1:58

and uh what we are really doing magnify

2:01

which is one of our subsidiaries

2:04

when we presented it here uh in august

2:07

had a few hundred thousand users which

2:09

the number of searches on our platform

2:11

has

2:12

exceeded 10 million last year which is

2:14

clearly telling us

2:15

that the marketplace needs a simpler

2:18

easier

2:18

more natural way to discover compare

2:21

investments

2:22

and the next national step for us was to

2:25

enable action

2:26

in how can you discover compare and then

2:28

maybe invest

2:29

which is what we're doing now with our

2:31

so quick note this is basically a

2:33

company

2:33

where they build fintech companies so

2:36

they do the infrastructure for

2:38

fintechs you used to push people after

2:40

they search stuff to

2:41

to other asset managers and brokers now

2:44

you're going to do it yourself how do

2:45

you take your commissions

2:47

great question first so i think that you

2:49

know this goes back to my academic

2:51

background it's pretty clear there's

2:52

lots of research

2:54

and evidence that uh excessive trading

2:57

hurts performance

2:59

and we also know that guess which

3:00

segment of the market trades excessively

3:03

it's really the discount

3:05

brokerage audience and the discount

3:08

brokerages all of them have an incentive

3:10

to promote trading whether it's through

3:12

commissions or whether it's through

3:14

it's through selling order flow so we

3:16

thought hard about how can we build a

3:18

platform that is really investor focused

3:21

and encourages investment um

3:25

so we don't make revenues from selling

3:28

order flow or from commissions

3:31

what we do is charge asset managers

3:34

investment managers

3:35

who who access the investors using our

3:38

platform and we do that in a very

3:40

transparent simple way

3:41

where if you go in and search for for

3:43

example e-commerce without amazon

3:46

you will find the first result sponsored

3:48

in a very transparent manner

3:49

we also have subscription services

3:52

um kathy wanted to talk a little more

3:54

broadly about fintech we

3:56

we know you're a big fan of it across

3:58

all of your

3:59

portfolios and uh it's been a great a

4:02

great play for you

4:03

so far is different some of those stocks

4:05

though on on simple multiples

4:07

can look quite expensive and we wondered

4:11

whether

4:11

we'd found a cheaper alternative for you

4:14

earlier on the show

4:15

we have bank of america chairman and ceo

4:18

brian moynihan

4:19

and uh here's a soundbite from that

4:21

interview

4:24

we are a technology company we're

4:26

basically huge capable technology

4:28

platforms

4:29

okay i heard him say that they literally

4:31

asked him

4:32

are you a fintech and he says we are a

4:35

technology company

4:36

i'm like bro bank of america why don't

4:39

you just be

4:39

straight with people and go we're not

4:41

like my answer would have been

4:43

something more like no we're not a

4:44

fintech a fintech is a smaller company

4:46

that doesn't have the experience

4:48

of an institution like us you know if i

4:50

were bank of america right like if i

4:51

were pitching them i would go from that

4:52

angle like

4:53

we actually have way more products and

4:55

way more services we're not a little

4:57

baby

4:57

financial company we're we're a big

4:59

financial company with better options

5:01

for our clients right like that's the

5:02

pitch i would have given

5:03

but this this pitch would in my opinion

5:04

was just like dodging the question it

5:06

was

5:06

sorry kathy i'm i'm i'm being a little

5:10

bit cheeky here but

5:11

seriously would you consider buying bank

5:13

of america as a fintech company for your

5:15

portfolios

5:17

well we do we we would not it's not what

5:19

we do

5:20

uh we are very focused on innovation and

5:24

uh and and very rapid growth companies

5:27

so our

5:27

revenue growth is uh north of 25 so

5:30

we're not going to see that

5:32

from the traditional banks but what we

5:33

will see is much like what has happened

5:36

in

5:36

traditional retail we have walmart and

5:39

costco and target

5:41

they are doing very well while a lot of

5:43

the market

5:44

is hurting badly so we do think that uh

5:47

industries that are going to that that

5:49

are um

5:51

they're under attack from fintech from

5:53

many many directions no question about

5:55

it

5:55

uh but the biggest and those who invest

5:58

in

5:59

technology in the the smartest way

6:02

possible

6:03

are going to basically consolidate the

6:05

industry we do

6:06

we do believe that uh what has happened

6:08

to retail

6:10

is going to happen to financial services

6:12

at an accelerated rate

6:14

makes sense kathy wanted to take the

6:17

opportunity with you just to ask about

6:18

some of some of your other

6:20

investments obviously a lot of buzz and

6:22

people pay attention when you come on

6:23

you made a lot of news warning about

6:25

china and have been unloading some of

6:27

the

6:27

the chinese names amid the crackdown

6:30

we've seen from the from the chinese

6:31

government what do you think is going on

6:33

there and what

6:34

happens to your holdings that are still

6:36

quite substantial and names like alibaba

6:38

are you just going to continue to unload

6:41

well

6:42

what you've seen is uh mostly in the

6:44

flagship strategy which

6:47

which incorporates all of our innovation

6:49

platforms

6:50

all of our ideas scarce real estate uh

6:53

50 names and when we see a

6:56

an assault and i would say it's more on

6:58

the valuation of many of these names uh

7:02

uh we we will pull out and and

7:05

consolidate towards higher conviction

7:07

names

7:08

in our other portfolios uh what you'll

7:10

see in our autonomous

7:12

technology and robotics strategy ark for

7:15

example

7:16

we haven't done that much except at the

7:19

margins

7:20

with those companies that we believe

7:23

need to expand outside the rest of the

7:26

world

7:26

in order to sustain their growth rates

7:29

we do believe that china is

7:30

clamping down i don't know if it's

7:32

capital controls

7:33

i do know there's a little bit of a

7:35

retaliation uh

7:37

against the biden administration's

7:39

policies which are a continuation of the

7:41

trump administration's policies i think

7:44

that's been the biggest surprise

7:45

for china and i think for most investors

7:50

we thought that the

7:51

u.s uh china savor rattling would

7:54

diminish somewhat that has not what you

7:57

will not see us do with the chinese

7:59

stocks

7:59

is pull out of those names that are more

8:02

endemic to china

8:03

itself china does want to be a leader in

8:07

innovation

8:07

and uh and is very supportive uh for

8:11

for uh its companies scaling as quickly

8:14

as they can

8:15

internally what i feel is going to hurt

8:19

at the margin though

8:20

is any company and in fact in their last

8:23

policy

8:24

announcement they said any company with

8:26

more than one

8:27

million users and as you know in china

8:31

i think wechat has over 800 million

8:34

users

8:34

they're going to be under tougher

8:36

regulatory scrutiny so i do think that's

8:38

a valuation downgrade

8:40

i think that has happened and uh let's

8:43

see what happens from here

8:45

uh i as i said i don't think china wants

8:47

to cut it

8:49

cut itself out of the innovation game i

8:51

think it'll encourage it internally

8:53

and we'll wait we'll wait for things to

8:55

settle down and then

8:57

again reopen and allow its companies to

9:00

scale more

9:01

into the rest of the world what what

9:03

about kathy

9:04

uh china's uh clampdown on on bitcoin

9:07

did that also

9:08

warrant a evaluation downgrade in

9:11

bitcoin

9:13

uh well it was the combination of that

9:15

and uh the

9:16

esg concerns that uh elon

9:20

elon musk headlined uh at one point in

9:23

time

9:24

uh so yes there's been angry but let me

9:27

explain give you a comparison in 2017

9:30

china shut down all of its exchanges

9:33

bitcoin exchanges

9:34

and uh the market went through a a

9:38

big uh fallout because many people

9:41

thought oh my gosh most of the trading

9:43

is taking place in china this is the end

9:45

well guess what it migrated elsewhere in

9:47

the world

9:48

japan korea and thailand were the

9:50

biggest beneficiaries back then

9:52

and as you will remember after that

9:54

bitcoin uh

9:56

started to scale from one thousand

9:57

dollars it was actually less than one

9:59

thousand

9:59

to twenty thousand dollars in that one

10:01

year so

10:02

i think the same is true with miners

10:06

somewhere between 50 and 7 65 of all

10:09

mining

10:10

bitcoin mining was in china i actually

10:13

think it's a healthier phenomenon

10:15

uh to uh disperse that mining and a lot

10:18

of it is coming to the united states

10:20

and moving towards renewables and as you

10:22

know we have just done a paper with

10:25

square we're going to have a conference

10:26

on

10:27

july 21st uh we're one of the hosts with

10:31

square

10:32

where we're going to explain how bitcoin

10:34

mining will probably become part of

10:36

utility ecosystems

10:38

and will proliferate renewables

10:41

faster than would otherwise be the case

10:44

so

10:44

we're pretty excited by that and we

10:46

think that uh elon musk

10:48

and tesla generally uh will become a

10:51

part of that ecosystem

10:52

so uh we think this is temporary we

10:54

think institutions pulled back and said

10:56

wait a minute what do we have here

10:58

esg's top of mind and i think we're

11:00

answering those questions

11:02

uh and at this conference you'll see uh

11:05

there could be nothing better than

11:08

bitcoin

11:09

in terms of esg governance with the

11:12

transparency

11:13

social this is a little bit of a use a

11:16

different use case but

11:17

uh enabling economic empowerment

11:20

throughout the world

11:22

uh and uh environmental if we're right

11:25

that

11:26

uh this community bitcoin community is

11:29

very environmentally conscious as are

11:32

the institutions

11:33

i think that we're going to see all of

11:35

the e s

11:36

g answered at that conference well that

11:40

it's a non-consensus view on on

11:42

certainly on bitcoin right now

11:44

kathy uh but maybe you're reassuring the

11:46

bitcoin fans they don't have to hate

11:47

elon musk

11:48

speaking of mr musk you know i was going

11:50

to ask you about

11:51

that and tesla and your position

11:54

he said this week at a trial kathy that

11:56

that tesla would die without him

11:58

and i'm curious whether you agree and

12:01

what it says about a company that you

12:02

value at almost two trillion dollars

12:05

that the ceo says without him would be

12:06

worthless

12:08

yes um well uh i think

12:12

that uh getting through the 0.809 near

12:15

bankruptcy

12:16

uh was elon musk brute force

12:19

determination and creativity ingenuity

12:23

and i believe also that it's uh

12:26

move up to this point he has been very

12:29

critical

12:30

uh especially around the move towards

12:32

autonomous i know most people don't

12:34

believe that

12:34

that's going to be successful but we

12:36

believe is going to be very successful

12:38

and he has been driven and

12:42

focused and has not let short-term

12:44

oriented shareholders

12:46

uh um divert him from

12:50

that mission so i do think just like

12:52

amazon if jeff bezos had not been there

12:55

i think about all the years i remember i

12:58

suffered with it uh

12:59

but what about going forward all the

13:02

years

13:03

uh jeff bezos during the tekken tele uh

13:06

crash and for i think through 2006 seven

13:09

after

13:10

he was saying we are not going to be a

13:12

profitable company

13:14

we are going to uh reinvest all the

13:17

upside from revenues

13:19

into the business and we are going to

13:21

take the lion's share of this business

13:23

uh not only that one and aws

13:27

so these leaders who are willing to

13:30

um to buck up against their largest

13:33

shareholders

13:34

and and say no we must invest now

13:38

if we want to capitalize on this

13:40

exponential growth

13:41

opportunity i think i put elon uh

13:45

jeff bezos steve jobs in that category

13:48

you know apple certainly would have

13:51

disappeared were it not

13:52

for uh steve jobs so uh these are very

13:55

special

13:56

visionary leaders there are not very

13:57

many of them they don't come around

14:00

uh there aren't the this big a set of

14:02

opportunities either

14:04

uh we think there are more now than

14:05

there have been historically because of

14:07

all of the innovation evolving

14:08

uh but i i understand what he says uh by

14:12

saying he doesn't like to be a ceo but

14:15

he had to be

14:16

uh and i agree with him i do agree with

14:19

him

14:20

she didn't answer i wanted to come back

14:22

to tiffin and uh

14:24

she didn't answer going forward and now

14:26

they're off the topic i'm kind of bummed

14:27

about that

14:28

like what if he left today i wondered

14:30

whether you were outright critical of

14:32

some of those apps

14:33

like for example robin hood but many

14:35

others too uh

14:36

that uh are incentivized by driving

14:39

volumes and what makes you confident

14:42

you'll attract those retail traders that

14:43

certainly at the moment

14:45

are very much engaged by trading stocks

14:47

whether or not

14:48

your platform might offer better

14:49

long-term returns for them or not

14:52

yeah wilfred great question look i think

14:54

robinhood has built a great business

14:56

uh for themselves for sure and we

14:59

respect them for bringing many more

15:01

participants into the markets

15:02

it's just a natural evolution that once

15:05

you democratize access

15:07

i think access without intelligence is

15:10

detrimental

15:11

and our purpose is quite different from

15:13

from robinhood's

15:14

what we want to do is to promote

15:17

investment

15:18

longer-term trading and better outcomes

15:21

you know we

15:22

we believe in gamifying knowledge for

15:25

better outcomes

15:26

rather than gamifying trading if you

15:28

will but

15:29

one meets you know one step had to

15:31

precede the other is my view on this

15:34

today there are enough participants even

15:37

beyond robinhood

15:39

there are many discount brokerages so

15:41

the segmentation

15:42

of the audience across brokerages

15:45

provides

15:46

enough opportunities we believe to

15:48

attract folks who

15:50

probably want to invest more responsibly

15:52

more intelligently

15:55

where'd they go and finally kathy i

15:56

always ask you every time you're on

15:59

what you think is the best opportunity

16:00

right now a lot of these hyper growth

16:02

names have been hit

16:03

and have not rebounded with the nasdaq

16:05

and some of the mega cap

16:06

tech name so so where do you see the

16:09

best opportunity

16:10

among all the names you like or even

16:12

maybe some new ones

16:13

well you know we've had a good rebound

16:16

sorry

16:17

we've had a good rebound since uh midway

16:20

mid-may i think uh and so growth has

16:23

come back

16:24

into fashion i think we're in a bit of a

16:26

dueling match

16:27

maybe risk off right now for the market

16:29

you were talking about inflation earlier

16:32

if i could just lob in a few examples of

16:34

major deflationary forces we're seeing

16:37

lumber prices today uh are

16:41

less it's they've dropped by almost

16:43

two-thirds

16:44

since the middle of may i do believe the

16:47

fed today is talking about

16:49

housing risks and so forth so that

16:51

perhaps that's one reason

16:52

but that's been a severe drop as ha

16:54

copper has come down 10 15

16:58

we are are seeing uh even in the auto

17:01

space the mannheim

17:02

used car index for the first time in 13

17:05

months

17:06

ticked down we believed used car

17:09

prices are uh going to to fall

17:12

uh they've they've gone way too far away

17:14

way too fast

17:16

and um we we talk all the time about the

17:18

deflationary forces associated inflation

17:21

i believe leah

17:22

earlier mentioned it uh but it's not

17:24

just on the disruptive innovation

17:26

side our companies causing uh these uh

17:29

falling prices that explode demand

17:32

that's good deflation there's another

17:34

thing going on it's called creative

17:36

destruction

17:37

and companies who have not been keeping

17:39

up with innovation

17:40

are going and have been leveraging up to

17:42

buy back shares

17:44

and satisfy short-term oriented

17:47

shareholders

17:48

they are going to have to service their

17:50

debt by cutting prices

17:51

so i think not only do we have good

17:53

deflation and bad deflation at work here

17:55

but now we're seeing the beginning of

17:57

cyclical deflation

17:59

and i think we're in a risk-off period i

18:01

know uh we got hit today a lot of growth

18:04

strategies got hit there was a shift

18:06

towards defensives

18:07

and i think there's a lot of confusion

18:09

but if growth is going to be scarce

18:11

because inflation's going to come down

18:13

uh

18:14

our kind of strategies which generate

18:17

revenue growth rates in the 25

18:19

percent plus range are going to shine

18:21

longer term

18:24

happy wood exciting i didn't mean yeah

18:27

cut you out so you know our top names

18:30

uh as usual tesla's at the the

18:33

head of the pack uh roku is a very

18:36

important name to us

18:37

square zoom shopify uh

18:40

teledoc uh these many of them are

18:43

described that

18:44

stay-at-home stocks and why you know

18:46

we're going back to work why

18:47

why are you paying attention to them uh

18:50

these

18:50

what we believe is the world or

18:52

coronavirus crisis

18:54

changed the world dramatically and

18:57

permanently

18:58

and one when consumers and businesses

19:02

find faster cheaper better more more

19:05

productive

19:05

more creative they're not going back to

19:08

the old world

19:09

so many of these stocks have been cut in

19:11

half and then

19:12

some because there have been algorithms

19:14

saying their stay at home stocks

19:16

sell them uh we think that's a mistake

19:20

cathy wood thank you very much fenay

19:22

nair thank you as well for joining us

19:23

from tiffin

19:24

and congrats again on the uh the new

19:27

addition to your board

19:28

thank you both bank of america didn't

19:30

make the list no

19:34

that's a good one to end it on uh okay

19:37

uh i want to just uh add some commentary

19:39

on this because uh

19:40

uh yeah there's some things that were

19:42

really interesting on this uh oh boy

19:44

that was a priceless uh way to end that

19:46

uh so some things that that are very

19:48

important to highlight uh

19:49

some notes that i took from what kathy

19:51

wood just said number one

19:53

i i love that she makes it so clear that

19:56

they target

19:57

growth companies look bank of america is

20:00

a company that is not expected to

20:02

grow anywhere near like

20:05

fintechs that makes sense right because

20:08

fintechs are starting small and

20:10

they have explosive growth ahead of them

20:12

in fact wall street estimates

20:14

for growth at a company like a bank of

20:16

america right now

20:17

are 2.8 percent for 2021

20:21

4 for 2022 5.6 for 2023

20:25

and so it becomes a little bit more

20:26

apparent that when you compare growth

20:28

and you're like wait a minute that's

20:30

well that's kind of low you know well

20:33

now it makes sense

20:34

why do you think you're paying a lower

20:35

multiple for the companies uh

20:37

sometimes i see these threads on reddit

20:39

and people are like oh

20:40

if the p e ratio is high it means it's

20:42

overvalued

20:44

no it doesn't it means there's a lot of

20:46

growth being priced in

20:48

sofi is expected to grow over 51

20:51

in the next year just to give you an

20:53

example let's think of another one

20:55

i don't know what's what's another one

20:56

uh we could uh um

20:58

ally maybe you could maybe consider ally

21:01

ally would be somewhat in the middle i

21:03

think i'd love to be able to look up

21:04

like a robin hood

21:05

uh yeah no i see ally not much growth

21:08

here actually

21:09

uh pretty low growth and ally so bad

21:11

example uh and then i don't use ally but

21:13

i'd love to look at like a robin hood

21:14

growth but i'm sure you can estimate

21:16

that yourself too

21:17

now your expectations are that robin

21:19

hood's not going to grow like a bank of

21:20

america at

21:21

two or three percent uh or it's going to

21:24

more likely grow

21:25

in line with what kathy's expectations

21:27

are for growth companies growing more

21:28

than 25

21:29

per year i guess suppose an easy example

21:31

would be because we talked so much about

21:33

it

21:33

as an easy example would be comparing to

21:35

let's say tesla right tesla's growth is

21:37

expected to be 50

21:38

compounded growth in deliveries over the

21:41

next few years

21:42

so uh that that's huge by the way so

21:45

anyway

21:46

uh additionally kathy wood reiterated

21:48

that during tough times

21:49

they they'd like to uh consolidate

21:53

their position so what they'll do is

21:54

they'll have fewer positions they'll

21:56

sell out of some positions that they

21:58

have less conviction in

21:59

and they'll add more to higher

22:00

conviction names she

22:02

talked a little bit about china how she

22:04

thinks there are a lot of risks with

22:05

china right now

22:06

china is uh is possibly uh

22:09

creating some issues because take a look

22:11

at this you've got

22:13

this as a as a headline here on

22:15

bloomberg us to extend

22:17

trump era halt on economic dialogue with

22:20

china

22:21

treasury secretary yellen and her staff

22:22

have no plans to resurrect the regular

22:25

u.s china economic dialogue

22:27

that governed ties between the two

22:28

nations during the obama and bush

22:30

administrations

22:31

and so here's just another example of a

22:33

kathy woods sort of

22:34

well i mean this was a headline piece on

22:36

on bloomberg here but but kathy wood

22:38

applying headline news

22:40

to her investing strategies she's saying

22:42

look this is a problem

22:44

when biden got in we thought relations

22:47

with china would get better

22:48

but biden's actually continuing them in

22:51

in essentially the worst direction

22:53

unfortunately

22:55

then we have information about her

22:57

talking about

22:58

uh china she spent a little bit actually

23:00

a good amount of time talking about uh

23:02

chinese china and bitcoin how uh china

23:05

essentially getting out of bitcoin

23:06

mining which previously potentially

23:08

supplied 60

23:09

60 to 70 percent of all of bitcoin

23:12

mining which estimates vary on this

23:14

so this is kathy's estimate 60-70

23:16

percent of bitcoin mining was in china

23:17

she says

23:18

she says from an esg point of view

23:20

environmental social governments right

23:22

this is a really really good thing uh

23:25

sustainability transparency uh social

23:28

empowerment very very good

23:30

uh so she likes this i've read her paper

23:33

with square on bitcoin

23:35

or paper uh with bitcoin or about

23:37

bitcoin with square

23:39

talks a lot about how we can actually

23:41

use bitcoin to help expand our green

23:43

energy grid this is something that

23:45

governor newsom for example in

23:46

california would be very smart to pay

23:48

attention to like why don't you pay

23:49

attention to the fact

23:50

that we could work and incorporate

23:52

blockchain incorporate bitcoin and

23:53

utilize this

23:55

with green energy expansion so we could

23:57

use energy that's otherwise being wasted

23:59

wonderful opportunities uh this is why

24:02

i'm running for governor california and

24:04

you should go to my rally this weekend

24:05

in bakersfield go to meetkevin.com to

24:08

sign up and of course get 40

24:09

off on my amazing coupons for building

24:11

your wealth link down below that coupon

24:12

code does expire on the 22nd yet

24:14

lifetime access to the programs

24:16

and prices will be going up on the 23rd

24:18

now tesla

24:19

on tesla elon musk in testimony i

24:22

actually pulled up

24:22

the exact quote so i could get the uh

24:25

the appropriate context because

24:26

personally i believe context is very

24:28

important

24:29

in a statement during his trial about

24:31

his acquisition of solar city

24:33

he claimed that while the ceo position

24:36

is one that he doesn't necessarily want

24:38

he must maintain the position or quote

24:40

frankly

24:41

tesla is going to die yeah that's not

24:44

good

24:45

that is a very current statement elon

24:48

musk is saying

24:49

presently either tesla is at risk of

24:52

dying without him

24:54

when kathy wood was just asked about

24:56

that on cnbc

24:58

she didn't answer she did not answer

25:00

that she literally talked about elon

25:02

musk and how important he was during the

25:03

bankruptcy

25:04

phase or or near bankruptcy phase in

25:06

2008 2009

25:08

how important jeff bezos was to amazon

25:10

when it was you know and how they didn't

25:12

want to be profitable how they wanted to

25:13

reinvest everything

25:14

how important steve jobs was to apple

25:16

during the tough times in the 80s and

25:19

90s

25:19

she told us nothing about her opinion

25:22

about what if elon musk leaves tomorrow

25:25

i didn't really like that non-answer i

25:27

don't know if she just forgot to get to

25:29

that part

25:30

now i'm just going to inject that yes i

25:32

know that kathy wood

25:33

said she agrees with elon but keep in

25:36

mind she's deflecting the question

25:38

the question is what would happen if

25:40

elon musk left now

25:42

and she says i agree if elon weren't

25:44

there in the past

25:45

it'd be bad so what do you think going

25:48

forward

25:49

but sara eisen had a pretty blunt

25:51

question and we got a miss on that one

25:54

personally if elon musk today is saying

25:56

tesla's going to die without them

25:58

that's scary right that's scary to hear

26:00

now i do personally believe

26:02

that this could be just an exaggeration

26:04

of elon musk

26:05

i i do believe that tesla is in a

26:09

wonderful

26:10

position to to grow and and sustain

26:12

without him

26:13

but i could be wrong and i'm not trying

26:14

to undervalue what he contributes

26:18

but it just makes me wonder like could

26:20

tesla continue at this point like apple

26:22

continued without steve jobs or does

26:24

tesla need another 10 years of elon

26:26

to get to that point of stability right

26:29

when steve jobs

26:30

unfortunately passed away and stepped

26:31

down from apple before that

26:34

uh sorry from from apple apple was very

26:36

very well

26:37

positioned i mean they they were what

26:39

was this 2013 or 14

26:41

you know iphone 1 was out iphone 3g was

26:44

out the ipad was out

26:45

uh i think facetime was already out at

26:48

that point let me see steve jobs

26:49

his face time was 2013 or 14 as well oh

26:53

wow wait a minute never mind

26:54

he died in 2011. oh i misaligned that a

26:56

little bit my bad

26:58

uh maybe i'm just not remembering when

26:59

facetime came out facetime release

27:01

facetime release date oh see okay okay i

27:04

just had my dates wrong facetime came

27:05

out in 2010 the ipad came out in 2010

27:08

the original iphone came out in 2007. so

27:10

a lot of these these really important

27:11

like innovative products came out right

27:13

before

27:14

uh his death and uh these were

27:16

incredibly successful products

27:18

so uh i'm surprised i was a few years

27:20

off on that one but

27:22

i was correct in my order just wrong in

27:24

my years

27:25

uh anyway uh then uh then let's see here

27:29

we also have this uh let's talk about

27:32

the market this dueling match in the

27:34

market

27:35

that kathy was talking about uh this

27:37

really has to do with the dually match

27:38

of inflation

27:39

i actually tweeted about this a little

27:41

bit i didn't really love

27:42

her investment or joining the board of

27:44

this this tripping company or whatever

27:47

uh maybe maybe this is uh

27:50

something that um uh i mean it's not a

27:53

company that i believe that we can

27:54

invest in

27:54

let's say triphen let's see if they're

27:56

public i don't believe it is i think

27:57

it's way too new

27:59

i think it's a larger sort of company

28:00

that uh or

28:02

sort of a a company that develops the

28:04

backbone or

28:05

infrastructure for companies like maybe

28:08

a robin hood

28:09

or a sofi or other sorts of fintechs or

28:11

maybe smaller banks wanting to become

28:13

fintech-esque but not something that's

28:16

available apparently to be invested in

28:18

right now

28:18

so uh yeah wasn't so excited about that

28:22

we did hear talk about the dueling match

28:23

of inflation deflation

28:25

i do want to give you these poll results

28:27

i would like i do want to get more of

28:28

your votes here

28:29

so please go on twitter and vote but

28:31

take a look at this will inflation be

28:32

transitory or not aka are you

28:34

in camp sarah eisen or michael bury and

28:36

we've got uh

28:37

the vast majority of you voting here

28:39

transitory

28:40

less than three percent in 2022 almost

28:43

half of you believing that

28:44

another almost uh well just over 17

28:47

percent of you so this would be about 60

28:49

percent of you going for the transitory

28:50

argument

28:51

and then another about 40 percent of you

28:53

going for the not transitory argument

28:55

but go ahead and cast your vote because

28:57

this is very early

28:58

in the poll so it could still shift

28:59

substantially but uh kester pull

29:02

uh vote to see how you feel at realme

29:04

kevin on twitter

29:05

okay uh kathy wood then went back to her

29:07

argument about deflation

29:09

uh and uh how there are going to be a

29:11

lot of deflationary forces

29:12

creative destruction innovation that

29:15

means older companies are going to have

29:17

to drop prices to try to be competitive

29:19

as they potentially go bankrupt and

29:21

disappear

29:22

as more innovative and better

29:23

technologies advance and take over

29:26

this is an argument she's talked about

29:27

many times before it's not really worth

29:28

fully rehashing it right now

29:30

uh she did also reference that lumbra

29:33

fell

29:33

a good chunk here in the last few weeks

29:35

i don't know if lumber is exactly the

29:37

best

29:38

reference okay look i want to be fair

29:39

i'm a big fan of kathy wood but i'm not

29:41

exactly sure that lumber is the best

29:42

reference to say deflation is here

29:44

because lumber just ran up like crazy

29:46

so it's no surprise that it the

29:48

speculative bubble of lumber is

29:50

is now behind us and it's falling down

29:52

so i don't i i'm certainly and look i'm

29:54

somebody who believes inflation's going

29:56

to be transitory that we're going to

29:57

have a bigger risk of deflation

29:58

but i'm not going to use lumber as my uh

30:01

as my backup

30:02

so as you can see him i have my

30:04

differences of opinion to kathy wood

30:07

uh but uh in general i think we're on

30:09

the same boat

30:10

so i hopefully appreciate this insight

30:12

if you do make sure to subscribe

30:14

and uh somebody says uh that kathy wood

30:17

did say that she agrees with him

30:20

about yeah but okay maybe maybe so i

30:23

just got a notification that some of you

30:24

say kathy said she agrees with a lot

30:26

so maybe she has she said she agrees

30:28

with elon but

30:29

the thing is her entire conversation was

30:32

focused on

30:34

the past she didn't give us any insights

30:37

into what about going forward right like

30:40

what what if elon leaves going forward

30:42

and i think that was a little bit

30:43

frustrating uh which which is also what

30:46

i highlighted

30:46

in in the past few minutes when i talked

30:48

about it anyway thank you so much for

30:49

watching this folks thanks for being

30:51

here

30:51

if you have found it helpful subscribe

30:53

use that 40 off coupon code link down

30:54

below

30:55

price does go up in about a week it's

30:57

actually eight days

30:59

yeah we'll see in the next one bye

31:00

everyone and we'll see in bakersfield as

31:02

well

31:02

bakersfield go to meet kevin.com

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.