TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Hell that's Coming | Punishing Fed.

22m 49s4,187 words587 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

now let's talk about the likelihood of

0:02

recession what just happened in the

0:04

Eurozone what are other folks as saying

0:08

and what's going on with five-year break

0:10

evens what's the disaster happening

0:12

today here on March 2nd and what do I

0:16

think about stocks bonds real estate

0:18

helocs we're gonna go through all of

0:21

that in this video but first we're gonna

0:23

jump on over here we're gonna listen to

0:24

CNBC and this likelihood of recession

0:27

being extremely high per former fed

0:30

Governor let's listen in you want to

0:33

bring in former fed Governor Frederick

0:34

Michigan he's now a Columbia University

0:36

professor and a CNBC contributor and

0:39

Rick it's really good to see you it's

0:40

been a while since we've gotten the

0:42

chance to talk to you you've got a new

0:44

paper that's out and it basically says

0:46

that the FED is damned if they raise

0:48

rates damned if they don't you want to

0:50

explain that

0:51

well I don't know if I put it quite that

0:53

way but the bottom line is that uh in

0:56

this paper which we we presented the U.S

0:59

monetary policy Forum that uh one of the

1:02

things we did is we looked at the

1:03

history and then we actually did some

1:05

economic modeling and the history says

1:07

you look at 16 uh uh uh uh cases of

1:11

where central banks actually tightened

1:13

uh interest rates when in fact they had

1:15

to get inflation down and this is in

1:17

many countries not just the US in every

1:20

single case you got a recession uh and

1:23

so uh you know maybe this time is

1:25

different but uh that's usually

1:27

dangerous thinking so just on that basis

1:30

alone uh the likelihood of a recession

1:33

is extremely high and this is

1:34

particularly true also from a economic

1:37

theory Viewpoint when a central bank

1:39

Gets behind the curve as the FED

1:41

certainly did they made a made a bunch

1:42

of mistakes uh particularly in 2021

1:45

which as you might know I've been on

1:47

CNBC uh since April of 2021 being very

1:50

critical of the pen on this when when

1:52

you get behind the curb in order to get

1:54

inflation back under control you have to

1:56

raise rates a lot and in fact you

1:57

inevitably have a recession so that the

2:00

you know this is just life uh the pet is

2:03

actually doing the right thing now

2:04

they've actually gotten uh uh uh on

2:07

board to do what they have to do they

2:09

stop being gradual they stop being they

2:11

were not preempted they now are uh but

2:14

the bad news is uh that uh that uh you

2:17

got to get the economy to slow down in

2:19

order to get inflation down when it's

2:21

actually uh burst up in a way that it

2:23

has recently well Rick let me let me

2:25

just say there are other people who look

2:27

at what you're talking about in history

2:29

where feds try and raise rates and

2:31

inevitably we wind up in a recession

2:33

they say it's just because some people

2:36

will say it's because the banks will

2:39

raise interest rates for too long go too

2:41

far as some people are arguing our

2:43

Central Bank is doing right now there

2:45

are people calling for a pause saying

2:46

wait and look around and see the lag

2:48

effect before you continue to raise

2:51

rates at additional Paces

2:54

um what do you say back to that uh I

2:57

this is super dangerous thinking so uh

3:01

uh one of the things we look at in the

3:02

paper is uh we look at a situation which

3:05

had a lot of parallels now which was the

3:07

vocal disinflation uh and many people

3:09

you know folk is a huge hero uh many

3:12

people don't really remember what went

3:13

on there the Federal Reserve when in

3:15

October 79 after voker became chair uh

3:19

raised interest rates to very high

3:20

levels uh and uh 17 actually was pretty

3:24

high level uh and then a recession

3:26

started and they backed off uh the

3:28

result was that inflation did not come

3:30

down expected inflation did not come

3:32

down uh and in fact uh uh uh there was

3:36

no ability to control inflation the FED

3:38

had lost its credibility and now

3:39

weakened it uh but to vocals the credit

3:42

he then realized that this was a mistake

3:45

and then the FED really took out the

3:46

baseball bat collaborate heads Big Time

3:48

raised uh federal funds rate to over 20

3:50

percent uh and then finally it took

3:53

several years of very high interest

3:55

rates than to get inflation down so uh

3:58

it is super dangerous thinking to think

4:00

that the FED should pivot uh that uh

4:02

when central banks have done that they

4:04

haven't completed their job they lose

4:06

credibility and particularly important

4:08

is when you've actually gotten behind

4:10

the curve you have to re-establish

4:12

credibility and therefore you have to be

4:14

tough now it's true that you might go

4:17

too far Central Banking by the way is

4:19

not an easy business it's uh there's a

4:21

lot of art to it there is science uh you

4:24

know uh economists have contributed to

4:26

that science of monetary policy but a

4:28

lot is Art and so you never quite get it

4:31

perfect but on the other hand uh picking

4:34

that you need to back off because you're

4:35

too worried about a recession is what

4:37

produces much worse recessions than

4:39

otherwise occur people forget that the

4:41

recession that occurred after the vocal

4:44

disinflation was actually the most

4:46

severe in the post-war period in fact

4:48

the unemployment rate went to above what

4:50

it did during the global financial

4:51

crisis uh so uh this is really uh

4:55

something that you really don't while

4:57

inflation was

4:59

all right yeah so okay what did we get

5:02

out of this well first of all yes the

5:04

likelihood of recession is High I mean

5:06

at this point it seems like a recession

5:07

is a foregone conclusion it'd be really

5:09

weird if we didn't get a recession

5:10

because every kind of signal you could

5:12

look at that's recessionary suggesting

5:14

recession hey maybe we will get a

5:15

recession I personally don't think it's

5:17

that big of a deal whether we have a

5:19

recession or not I think what actually

5:21

matters most is the depth of a recession

5:23

but what did he say that we could really

5:26

take away from here and how does this

5:28

sort of echo what we're seeing at the

5:30

Federal Reserve well the biggest concern

5:32

that Jerome Powell keeps talking about

5:33

at the Fab is this idea that they would

5:36

potentially cut rates and then have to

5:39

raise rates again because that could

5:41

lead to what Jerome Powell calls an

5:43

unanchoring of inflation expectations

5:45

and lead to a substantially worse

5:46

recession because basically they would

5:48

have to raise rates a lot higher that's

5:50

exactly what this former fed Governor

5:52

just mentioned uh and uh you know it's

5:55

it's the biggest issue I think that we

5:58

Face going forward is exactly that a

6:00

Breaking of inflation expectations and

6:03

unfortunately even though I I like to be

6:06

a bullish I have to say this chart right

6:09

here is bearish this right here on

6:12

screen now is a chart of uh inflation

6:15

expectations it is the five-year

6:18

inflation uh expectations chart if I go

6:20

ahead and draw a line over here and uh

6:23

we just sort of look at where we are

6:25

right now all the way back up to 2.7 I

6:28

mean look at this inflation expectations

6:30

went down to under about 2.15 on the

6:33

five-year Break Even we've just gone

6:35

straight up uh since the end of January

6:38

and into Feb here we are now sitting at

6:41

the same levels of inflation

6:42

expectations that we saw in October and

6:45

as a result we are seeing the 10-year

6:48

treasury yield right back over four

6:50

percent which is horrible for Real

6:52

Estate uh people thought for a moment

6:55

that uh I mean and you can sort of align

6:56

it with the uh the 10-year or the

6:58

five-year break even over here people

6:59

thought over here in December and

7:01

January that's it inflation has

7:03

conquered uh the 10-year treasury yield

7:05

is plummeting we're down to 3.38 well

7:08

now after some of the hot data that

7:10

we've gotten in January and some of the

7:12

stagflationary data that we got

7:14

yesterday and today this isn't good

7:17

remember yesterday we got pmis that

7:20

suggested manufacturing uh orders are

7:23

are cut in a contractionary territory

7:25

but all of a sudden The Institute for

7:27

supply side management suggests prices

7:29

being paid are in an expansionary

7:31

territory in other words prices are

7:33

going up again so now you're really

7:34

looking at stagflation you could look at

7:36

this morning's report as well from the

7:39

Eurozone the Eurozone this morning

7:41

reported 8.5 headline inflation that's

7:44

on a 20 country inflation estimate 8.5

7:47

headline that's down from 8.6 which is

7:50

great but sort of a slow decline uh the

7:53

expectation was 8.2 so you've actually

7:55

come in higher than expectations but the

7:57

problem was that core can came in higher

8:00

again not only did core come in above

8:03

expectations but it actually Rose from

8:05

the prior report the prior report was

8:07

5.3 percent came up to 5.6 so you

8:10

actually have a lot of ammunition that

8:13

you are giving to the Bears right now

8:15

suggesting this inflation fight is not

8:18

over in fact that's why you have people

8:21

like this David Einhorn guy who's

8:22

jumping on saying he's negative the

8:24

stock market and bullish on bonds milk

8:27

the yield so to speak basically he was

8:29

shorting the market all last year and

8:31

now he's suggesting hey you should still

8:33

be short the market so how does this

8:36

play in with with the sort of Nike

8:38

Swoosh recovery thesis well I think all

8:41

of it comes down to the dates that you

8:43

have to write down and the dates are

8:45

very simple it's March 10th 14th and

8:49

22nd those are the dates you want to pay

8:51

attention to because we're going to get

8:52

the rigged I mean the jobs report on the

8:55

10th then we're gonna get a CPI on the

8:58

14th and then we'll get the f OMC on the

9:00

22nd and so far the leading data

9:03

suggesting it's probably going to be

9:05

hotter than expected and that either

9:08

means inflation is becoming uncontrolled

9:10

which would be the worst case scenario

9:12

or inflation is just going to be hotter

9:14

for longer and so that's where we have

9:16

to sort of evaluate okay what does that

9:18

mean from an investor point of view

9:19

right well I think we can write that

9:22

down as as basically three scenarios so

9:25

if if we have if we continue to have

9:27

disinflation which right now seems to be

9:30

going away well that's obvious right

9:31

that's basically just stocks right up

9:34

stocks that's that's very simple uh

9:37

especially growth stocks uh and even

9:39

profitless companies one of the reasons

9:42

by the way because Arc invest absolutely

9:44

killed it in January uh and you know

9:47

just I don't want to like blanket

9:48

statement Arc invest and say you know

9:50

profitless companies are bad I think

9:51

there are some fantastic companies they

9:53

invest in there's some companies they

9:54

invest in I don't want to invest in this

9:56

is not not any kind of limit but they

9:57

did very very well in January because if

10:00

you can confirm a disinflationary

10:02

narrative not only will stocks go up but

10:04

you'll definitely see a a spike in Risk

10:08

especially profit list companies now one

10:11

of the reasons I personally have been

10:13

this is a personal financial advice for

10:15

you right but this is just sort of broad

10:17

uh Financial commentary you can even say

10:20

Financial advice it's just not

10:21

personalized right

10:23

um you know one of the reasons I've been

10:25

a big fan of keeping some more cash on

10:28

the side not not a lot you know 10

10:30

something like that and uh only exposing

10:34

myself to PP you know pricing power kind

10:36

of stocks and stocks with high free cash

10:39

flow is because of scenario number two

10:42

so scenario number one might be the

10:44

disinflation narrative scenario number

10:46

two is the uh the sort of uh bumpy the

10:50

bumpy ride scenario right uh bumpy ride

10:53

where basically you have inflation that

10:56

stays higher for longer so inflation

10:58

inflation higher for longer but but

11:02

slowly trending down right but slowly

11:04

down trending so the channel is down so

11:07

to speak but it's it it's taking a

11:10

little longer right and then of course

11:11

you have scenario number three which is

11:13

the worst case scenario and this is your

11:16

Paul volcker scenario where basically

11:18

the FED has lost control uh loss of

11:22

control that's your worst case scenario

11:24

obviously right I don't actually believe

11:27

any of the data we're seeing right now

11:29

is reminiscent of a loss of control even

11:32

those five-year break evens right this

11:34

is not screaming loss of control let me

11:36

hide myself for a moment over here in

11:39

March and April this was the market

11:40

saying oh my God we're losing control

11:43

right this here was the market saying

11:45

holy crap we're screwed okay so if this

11:48

is loss of control over here let's let's

11:50

write that down so it's annotated and

11:52

it's maybe a little bit more clear so

11:53

let's put a little background on this

11:55

there we go okay good so if this right

11:58

here is loss of control and we'll go

12:01

ahead and drop that right here then

12:03

right here is probably your disinflation

12:06

right this is your scenario number one

12:08

this is your scenario number three well

12:12

what the market is telling you right now

12:13

is that yes we are trending towards loss

12:16

of control but really where we're

12:18

sitting is at the bumpy ride level right

12:21

bumpy ride uh and and so that's that's

12:24

where I would align myself where I am I

12:26

should aligning myself right now with

12:28

the bumpy ride thesis and for me the

12:31

bumpy ride thesis says okay inflation is

12:33

going to be higher for longer so how do

12:35

I invest with inflation that's higher

12:37

for longer but trending down well

12:39

nothing's changed you know people say

12:42

I'm the biggest flip-flopper ever and

12:43

yeah that's true but there are also a

12:45

lot of things I am I'm very consistent

12:47

on and and for me even with the data

12:51

we're getting so far I still believe in

12:53

that that sort of Nike uh a swoosh it's

12:56

just going to be more bumpy uh sort of

13:00

more turbulent than expected

13:03

and I do believe that means more pain

13:07

for real estate for longer so it sort of

13:10

delays your bottom for Real Estate with

13:12

the exception of Miami I mean Miami is

13:14

just absolutely killing it and I think

13:16

that's just sort of because so many

13:17

people have been moving to Miami but

13:19

anyway uh you know what is obviously the

13:22

risk so what happens now we have to ask

13:23

ourselves what happens if uh the 10th

13:27

14th are bad right so if these two dates

13:31

are bad well then what happens is uh

13:34

there will be massive fear

13:37

between the 14th to 22nd you'll have

13:41

massive fear between the 14th to the

13:43

22nd because we'll be worried about 50

13:47

BP from fed which won't happen uh but

13:52

but the markets will be very worried

13:53

about that and will be worried about a

13:57

verbal spanking right that's that's

14:00

where the worries will really be from so

14:02

if we have now now if we have a really

14:04

uh but but okay let me put this way a

14:07

somewhat bad

14:09

a somewhat hot 10th uh 14th won't

14:13

necessarily mean we're in a scenario

14:18

three Paul volcker right a somewhat hot

14:21

10th or 14th just reiterates bumpy ride

14:25

which to me reiterates pricing power

14:27

stocks right

14:28

if uh like for me to be really concerned

14:31

real concern like serious concern like

14:34

oh my God we need to change strategies

14:36

potentially or like have a little bit

14:37

more of a cash allocation or whatever

14:39

like yes the sell word right real

14:42

concern would would be an explosion

14:45

in uh in inflation right and and where

14:48

do you get this you get this in the uh

14:50

wage uh uh uh sort of wage data on wage

14:54

growth on the 10th and then you get it

14:57

in obviously the CPI report uh and this

15:00

would be a breakdown in core uh which is

15:03

possible that you get that especially as

15:05

maybe used car prices pop back up so uh

15:08

really we're probably if if sort of I

15:11

drew a spectrum here and uh in my

15:15

opinion I put us at you know zero which

15:19

is full on disinflation and 100 which is

15:22

full on Paul volcker you're screwed uh I

15:25

would probably put us uh right about

15:28

here which is about at the 40 level so

15:32

slightly like really heavily in the

15:34

bumpy ride Zone but slightly closer to

15:37

disinflation than closer to Paul volcker

15:39

and that's simply because of leading

15:41

leading wage data that we're seeing

15:43

right a leading wage data about wages

15:45

coming down on the supply of labor

15:47

skyrocketing what earnings calls are

15:49

saying what forecasts are saying and

15:51

really as long as we end up with the

15:53

bumpy ride scenario

15:55

recession or not is not going to be that

15:57

big of a deal it's scenario number three

15:59

that's bad because that's going to be

16:01

basically depressive like that that

16:03

would be terrible I mean this is really

16:05

where unemployment skyrockets right so

16:08

scenario number three is depressive

16:10

uh scenario number one is just basically

16:13

the moon and then where we are is just

16:16

probably the very wide middle which is

16:18

quite a bumpy ride and so those are my

16:19

sort of expectations going forward uh

16:22

and and some commentator here about

16:23

these massive fears I I really do not

16:25

believe uh the FED has has any interest

16:28

in in going to 50 Beyond maybe just

16:30

yapping about uh a 50 like oh yeah open

16:33

to it you know whatever they say crap

16:35

like that all the time uh I don't expect

16:37

that because in my opinion it's too much

16:39

of a credibility shot in the foot uh

16:41

suggesting that uh that uh you know they

16:44

they have once again failed uh so uh you

16:48

know somebody here writes if we had a

16:49

very hot inflation report 50 BP will

16:51

happen but in fact it doesn't matter if

16:53

they go 25 or 50 all the hikes they have

16:56

done already are not yet reflected in

16:58

the economy get ready for a clapping

17:00

yeah I mean you're not wrong right there

17:03

is still a lag I think we would have to

17:06

have a substantially hot uh 10th and

17:09

14th report for a 50 kind of clapping

17:11

recessions can be natural and needed I

17:14

don't mind a recession I mind the damage

17:15

being done by pretending we can avoid it

17:17

forever yeah exactly it's kind of like

17:19

just go through your medicine take your

17:21

medicine and go through it you know let

17:23

the Staples Get Wrecked and go from

17:25

there

17:26

uh let's see here

17:30

inflation

17:32

inflation striba

17:34

then

17:41

okay basically

17:43

the government's to blame for inflation

17:45

because they spend too much damn money

17:47

and maybe if the government stops

17:48

spending so much damn money uh we'd have

17:50

less inflation well yeah that's a really

17:53

good point because not only uh is is

17:56

that true uh but you know we're still

17:58

providing massive stemi checks right

18:00

it's just going to electric vehicle

18:02

companies and Chip companies now

18:04

so uh Nick T also just retweeted an

18:08

article uh about uh CPI running a little

18:11

bit higher than pce but there's this

18:13

expectation that maybe those will flip

18:15

uh this year I don't know how much that

18:18

really matters but he basically posted a

18:21

couple screenshots here uh oh look they

18:23

talk about the wedge how cool uh but

18:25

anyway it's really just the difference

18:27

between CPI and PC and really the

18:29

thought is that CPI might fall faster

18:31

than PC I don't terribly care uh you

18:35

know which one's falling faster whatever

18:37

the fed's preferred method obviously is

18:39

looking at pce and what they're saying

18:41

is here the rate of falling of CPI is

18:43

faster than PC which is great you know

18:45

it sort of reiterates the uh

18:47

disinflationary idea but uh let's be

18:50

real we're still um

18:52

we're we're still dealing with one heck

18:55

of a bumpy ride let's put it this way I

18:57

wouldn't want to be on uh you know this

19:00

this sort of like if this Market were a

19:02

plane you wouldn't really want to be on

19:04

it because you'd be very uncomfortable

19:05

you'd probably get motion sickness and

19:07

and uh and want to vomit now how does

19:11

that actually relate to us holding

19:13

stocks well fortunately there's no

19:14

motion sickness there maybe where there

19:16

is some motion sickness is the fact that

19:18

the new you know yesterday we talked

19:20

about this guy Goolsby who now is the

19:22

president of the Chicago Federal Reserve

19:24

Bank

19:25

apparently the way he was hired was a

19:28

company was basically contracted called

19:31

Diversified Search Group and that

19:34

Diversified search group was put in

19:36

basically hired to find a new president

19:37

for the Chicago fed and the person that

19:41

was hired

19:42

was actually the director's husband

19:45

at the Diversified search group so in

19:48

English a lady

19:51

worked at a recruitment firm that was

19:53

hired by the FED to find a new president

19:55

and she's like you know would be perfect

19:56

for this job my husband

19:59

kind of interesting anyway that gives

20:01

you a little bit of a maybe some Jade

20:03

for what's going on with the FED but you

20:06

know they are they're just human too

20:08

they don't really know what the heck's

20:09

going on that these are things that I'm

20:11

paying attention to to help me uh to

20:13

sort of help guide me uh but again you

20:15

know uh look would I be throwing my

20:17

money into bonds or savings probably if

20:20

if I was wanting to buy a lot of real

20:22

estate yes absolutely I'd probably be

20:24

all in on on bonds and savings I just

20:26

milked the yield until I was ready to

20:28

buy real estate uh you know I and I do

20:31

think with the skyrocketing of the

20:33

10-year treasure yield they're still

20:34

paying a substantial amount of pain

20:36

unfortunately ahead of us you know you

20:38

look at the bond yields right now my

20:39

goodness skyrocketed this morning it's

20:41

up seven bips look at this you're right

20:44

four point almost 07 on the 10-year

20:47

treasury I mean you zoom out on this I

20:49

think we're at the highest level since

20:50

like October or November now yeah yeah

20:52

look at this we briefly went to about

20:54

4.2 in October over here but boy this

20:57

right here was where you started getting

20:58

the the idea that oh real estate's

21:00

bottoming and people starting to buy

21:01

again yeah well they're about to get

21:03

spanked uh yikes so uh you know hey look

21:07

if I wanted to buy real estate I'd be

21:09

standing by but I still maintain uh and

21:12

and we'll see you know I might have to

21:13

change my mind after the 10th to the

21:15

14th but at this moment I still maintain

21:17

substantially the Nike Swoosh idea uh

21:20

even though you know markets are again

21:22

going to respond I expect quite volatile

21:24

absolutely anyway uh to uh to the next

21:28

few weeks because there'll be so much

21:30

essentially fear uncertainty and doubt

21:32

about what's going to come uh which

21:34

entirely makes sense uh yeah I I would

21:37

um

21:38

you know I I guess wait and see as far

21:41

as Tesla that darn thing's like down

21:43

almost eight percent in the pre-market

21:45

right now wouldn't be surprised by the

21:47

way if that sort of retraces back to

21:49

about 175. that's probably where you

21:51

have the best support right now for

21:53

Tesla is about that 175 level you could

21:55

see that on screen here and that's

21:57

really just looking at our retracements

21:59

over here we got rejected at the 221 uh

22:01

and we generally don't like to float

22:03

around in the middle so I wouldn't be

22:04

surprised to see a nice retracement

22:06

we're already going to get a massive red

22:08

candle stick down to about 187. what I

22:10

do think will be very interesting is

22:12

what kind of buy the dip activity are we

22:14

going to get from institutions when the

22:17

market actually opens up that will be

22:19

very interesting are we going to get a

22:21

lot of selling before these reports

22:23

possibly a lot of Institutions have a

22:26

very hard time justifying buying before

22:28

inflation or jobs report that's come out

22:31

so the next few weeks uh really the next

22:34

two weeks most importantly the next 12

22:36

days are going to be very very critical

22:38

so we'll pay a lot of attention to

22:40

specifically what's going on there but

22:42

that's roughly my take right there on uh

22:45

on markets and what's going on

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.