Opposition Rule:Timeframe Selection, sessional signals

Okay guys, welcome back. And in our last

discussion, we spoke about opposition

rule. And of course, if you are new to

the channel and you are wondering what

are these ones talking about, you don't

even understand a thing. I would advise

you start from the free 2024 mentorship

playlist as you can see right here or in

the description below. It will always be

there. I think that's the only major

playlist on this particular channel. So

watch from the beginning so that you

will follow and stay updated on the

beautiful value that have been bringing

to you guys. All right, without further

ado, let's talk about our next topic on

the series that we started a little time

ago. Now the next thing we are to talk

about like I said in the last video is

quadrant rule. And I said the effect of

quadrant rule after we have used our

position rule to niche down the time

frames that we are interested in like

two time frames conclusively are saying

different thing based on frequency. So I

now said quadrant is what we use to

balance frequency in order to actually

know which of those time frames or at

every point is it the swing guy do we

register buyer and after the flip do we

register sellers or whatever. So when

two time frames that are conclusive

based on opposition rule are saying

different stories then we will to now

niche down that more and be able to know

that yes this particular final time

frame is what we will stick with and is

what we will use to you know register

our final participants. So what is the

work of quadrant 2? Quant is talking

about our odd harmonics that is odd

frequency movement. The movement is not

actually odd. The movement is even. I'm

talking about four movements now. So

let's say for example we know that um

for a complete movement of our

participant they will make three moves.

Buyers will buy, they will sell and they

will buy. Sellers will sell, they will

buy and then they will sell to complete

their cycle. Right? But one thing there

is that after the complete cycle in as

much we are still within the range of

the same day. For example, if price now

come to raid the second leg of any of

those participant, we say that that is a

flip and that is the fourth move. So

that fourth move is a situation whereby

we have a certain participant cycle

being complete and then a new

participant now takes over. All right.

Now if that happens on a certain time

frame but on another time frame that is

conclusively true based on our

opposition rule which we discussed that

will also be linked in the description

in case you missed that that will also

be linked in the description. So on

another time frame that is also

conclusive let's say there is even no

completion of cycle that is price did

not complete any cycle there but it was

conclusive. So it is cord that will now

let us know okay based on the

relationship on this two wave or

participant movement. What can we do to

then ensure that we go with just one

time frame which is true and relevant

for whatever it is that we want to do.

Therefore that is what we want to do in

this video and without further ado let's

get into the chat and talk about that.

All right guys welcome back to class. So

we have discussed opposition rule and

different logics. However, the logics we

refer as their uses and the three major

logics we will focus on all through and

that we use will be the open price

logic,

the close candle logic that is closing

range logic and also the close open

logic. All right. So I would like to

start with the binary

signals which is um daily and above that

is using opposition rule to get daily

true daily participants weekly

participants monthly and above and

before I go to the sessional case.

So for daily participants and above

weekly, monthly, yearly,

we majorly use closing range logic

majorly most times except when there are

gaps. I times there are gaps at the open

especially on a time frame where you can

spot it. Huge gap I mean gaps that are

very visible. We focus majorly on close

open logics.

Close open logics but majorly generally

we use close candle logic that is the

closing range logic where the candle the

closing candle I handle is um

so say for example I have uh let's say

I'm on 1 hour time frame for example and

this is the last candle that closed

there. So we say that our close

candle logic or closing range logic is

majorly that such that when the new day

opens if price clear the high even if I

clear the low of this I clear the low of

this and then go like this this will be

close open logic. So this is not um

close candle logic. So close logic is

that this is not target yet. This still

has to come and read it. So that is the

low permanently the low of the closed

candle and it high are the open range

high and the open range low

respectively.

So we have price clear the high clear

the low and then it makes the target.

Okay. And if we flip is flip. So that's

pretty much our close candle

logic

and we now say that in case where there

are visible gaps.

So when can we have visible gaps? So

let's say for example I have this.

So all right and this was the closed

candle.

This is a closed candle.

So here now we have

our closed candle. Then we now have a

gap. All right. So let's say price gap

up like this at the open with a new

candle that clearly break away from the

close or the previous candle here.

This is a gap. Now in that case what we

use to register our signal

is the close open logic because that is

close logic there is what can ensure

that because when there's a gap there is

discontinuity you know price is

continuous it is a continuous function

over time when there are gaps there are

some minor discontinuities or major

discontinuities and so close open jig is

the one that can help us reconnect that

fact and is the one that will enable us

to be able to now use opposition rule.

So majorly here now I can then use close

open logic on this.

So by ensuring that this is already

registered as price clearing the high

tring.

So after that I can then say price clear

the high tring. Therefore, we can now

say if I clear the low of the open

candle that has already price clear the

low and price met the target and so any

other thing here will be a flip. So yes,

close logic is what works perfectly for

the situation around this particular

one. So that should be well noted. More

on that will be in practical classes

when we have that.

So these are major logics that we use.

Now our position rule therefore is

specific to

the time frame as seen and it is not

like an infinite slope. It is a very

finite slope. Every time frame is

discreet though not unique.

Why is it not unique? It is not unique

because obviously

if price crosses a certain level let's

say 1.0725

on one minute time frame it surely

crosses on every other time frame

intrinsically. So summation of effect of

time frame they showing the true things

what shows uniqueness but each time

frame is discrete which means that it is

separate to read present data that we

want to read. All right, that's by the

way. Now one thing to

understand therefore next is operation

rule is conclusive as seen under our

defined logic that we might have picked.

So which means let's say we have

something like this

um previous day

and a new day

and um basically let's assume this to be

on any time frame say 1 hour time frame

any time frame at all.

The whole idea of oblationary is to

ensure that it is not about time frame.

This can be six hour time frame. It can

be any other time frame.

Now the previous day does not have to be

correct. It doesn't even have to be

correct in opposition rule wise. The

major thing there is that the previous

day cleared the low, clear the high

under close candle logic now met the

target maybe flip to buyer and keeps

coming and keeps coming and then closes

here. The major signal it closes with as

red on that time frame. We don't need

that. Oh, is the buyer is closed with is

it correct on a position? No, we don't

need that. The major thing is as seen on

that one hour time frame, I saw that it

cleared the low clear, he met the

target, it flipped to buy and so it

ended in buyer. So the liquidity at the

closing candle on that time frame on 1

hour time frame for daily participants

is daily participants. Now we are trying

to read. So for daily bib as read on 1

hour time frame liquidity at this high

is telling us buyer plus at the low also

plus an opposition says that there must

be absorption first which means that

liquidity rate which means seller must

rate buyer or buyer must rate seller for

us to conclusively say okay 1 hour time

frame is something we can be conclusive

about. But there is one more thing we

need to talk about between higher time

frame difference and um lower time frame

difference. Higher time frame retains

imbalance. Lower time frame retains

structure and liquidity.

We'll get to that shortly. So basically

here now what position rule is saying is

that for me to agree with one hour time

frame that is showing me something real

it must first clear the low first that

is must signal to me that buyers

are in control that sellers are in

control sorry D minus that is all

positive participants towards the

previous day closes.

This must show me that sellers first

right and when it show me that it's sell

at first

then I can now proceed with this. So

here

we have sell as first. So this time

frame is conclusive that participant for

this day has an energy called D minus.

All right. So has an energy called

D minus.

So that's basically

it. So here now we have D minus

and so 1 hour is conclusive.

But say this now opens at plus first

then that is not conclusive.

So let's say with this start with D plus

then that will not be conclusive and we

will drop 1 hour. So that's what

position helps you do. It helps you not

to even deal with that time frame at

all. That is I have nothing to do with

you. All right is what it is. Now

another thing to note here is that the

logic

to be deployed does not have to be

consistent for the two parties.

What do I mean by that? Because

continuity is still maintained and

opposition rule can still effectively be

used. What do I mean by that? The logic

price show you is what you are to use

based on what I discussed earlier.

If

here for example at the new day I want

to register part if there was gap for

example the logic I will use will be

close open that is if I come down and

then climb up then clear the eye and

then met the targets and then let's say

it's flip so that means after I have

done my D minus D minus D minus then

this will be a D+ for

Now that you all understand the

opposition rule for daily in fact

generally that is how position is used

and above. One more thing to understand

is now the higher and lower time frame

um dynamics. All right. So we have the

higher

and

uh lower time frame dynamics.

Lower time frame dynamics

structurally higher time frame retains

true structure if it is conclusive as of

opposition rule. Lower time frame

retains only imbalance which means

higher time frame retains what you can

call liquidity. Lower time frames can

only retain imbalance and I will explain

this shortly. So let's say for example I

have um 1 hour and I have 8 hour time

frame

and

say for example I have two different

days

okay which form a passive as you can see

here passive and the move that read it

is our aggressor

1 hour in this case let's say tells us

that

conclusively or we might conclude our

passive maybe on an incremental it might

not be on 1 hour time frame but

conclusively our passive is D+ so the

one that will vary here will be the

aggressor conclusively on 1 hour time

frame the aggressor here is D minus

that same range that we have there is

now what we also have here on 8 hour

Conclusively like I said for the passive

I have no issue with that conclusively

no matter the higher time frame we will

go to let's say we still have D plus but

conclusively aggressor here conclusively

which means opposite day opposite day

can even be somewhere around there so

don't think this is immediate days this

might be you know Monday this might be

Wednesday this might be Thursday or

whatever so the immediate day previous

day that confirms these aggressor can be

Wednesday can be somewhere found around

here can even be found around there or

whatever but conclusively that is that

previous day was uh D minus and um our

new day on 8 hour time frame to conclude

the aggressor so this time frame I wrote

here we use them to conclude the

aggressor now let's even say they are

not even the one we use to conclude the

passive maybe passive is another time

frame entirely you know based on same

logic and conclusively no two different

time frames says oppos What do you think

or the passive? So for the aggressor we

have aggressor here is D plus

conclusively under same logic please. So

here now

most of my reference will be closing

range logic. Remember where I use close

open logic for daily and above is only

when I have what only when I have um

gaps in order to you know to balance

frequency and to ensure position and to

ensure continuity after the

discontinuity that is repair or

continuity and whatever. So D plus D

plus

so the dynamics of this time frame is

that let's say 8 hour is the highest

time frame to register daily

participants. Now mind you you cannot

register a participant on the time frame

on that of that same participants. What

do we mean by that? Even if it's

conclusive day I cannot register a daily

participant truly like truly truly truly

on daily time frame. No, it has to be a

lower time frame. Maybe from app daily

below 12 hour below. So let's say 8 hour

is the highest time frame possible to

register daily participants here.

All right. And that gives us the

conclusive the highest conclusive time

frame was 8 hour maybe when you go to 12

hour or it's no longer conclusive. And

also mind you you don't just pick any

random time frame that should we now

check all time frame 15 minutes 55

minutes. No, you want to go for time

frames that align with open of the

participant you are reading at least a

new hour candle opens at exactly when

the day open. So not like you now go to

let's say 11 hour 11 hour time frame

will not always open at exactly when the

day open. All right. So that cannot

accurately give us the cycles of daily

participant or the footprint of daily

participants.

So basically here now this is 8 hour

time frame and we have said let's say

this is the highest conclusive based on

opposition row highest conclusive

participants D plus 1 hour D minus. Now

this I here is not liquidity even though

1 hour is showing us that it is

liquidity. That is not

liquidity. 1 hour is showing if we want

to go by our logic of D minus D plus 1

hour is showing us that it is liquidity

but it is not liquidity.

It is not because when two time frames,

a lower time frame, this could even be

one minute time frame. A lower time

frame conclusively say this and higher

time frame and it will always be two

time frames comparation, never three

because this is binary. It can only be

one showing you buyer, the other showing

you seller. So it's all about highest

conclusive time frame against

any low relative time frame. All right,

any lower relative time frame but

highest conclusive time frame very

important emphasis on highest highest

conclusive

time frame is what we use to conclude

our true signal. highest conclude safe

time frame. So basically 8 hour holds

our liquidities.

All right. So let me draw that again. We

have our 1 hour,

we have our 8 hour

and we have this, we have D plus and we

said this gives us D minus.

Okay.

Why we now have this D + D+ and we are

interested in the aggressor. We say

aggressor conclusively on one hour says

G minus conclusively on the A time frame

says D+. So this is not liquidity

because we go for what the highest time

frame possible says which is that this

is buyer and we already conclude that

the passive conclusively on all major

time frame is D+ but however so this

retains either this high liquidity or

not but however what retains imbalance

is the lower time frame. Okay, the lower

time frame shows D minus sellar, right?

So let's say for example when price is

now coming back,

price now engineer a daily liquidity DL.

Okay, so price engineers a daily

liquidity deal.

That same area can then sponsor price

because this is supply imbalance. All

right. When we get to im imbalance, we

will get to understand that better. But

this is what is happening here. We need

to understand that from signal

perspective right now. So this is seller

taking control from buyer. So it can

sponsor a sell. So you could have been

wondering if you had just seen the

opposition rule and everything confirmed

from you for one hour and you are

expecting that even maybe this eye will

be raided. No. Or maybe you even try to

buy and you were thinking that such I

will be rated. I'm telling you now that

that will not be rated because it is not

liquidity.

So

this

right here makes it not to be liquidity.

However, the imbalance structure is

retained. Same thing if it is say in

the same day. All right. So let's say um

it is same something. Let's say you know

price clear the high clear the low made

the target flip to seller conclusively.

Uh previous day here is D minus and this

now clear the eye clear the low made the

target flip to seller clear the eye. Let

me put it here. So clear the high, clear

the low, made the target for seller. So

this right here is imbalance for

sellers.

All right. Anytime we have daily

liquidity,

we relatively will have that sponsoring

it. But if there's a conclusive that is

D minus now, all right, if there's a

conclusively the higher time frame, the

highest time frame that is conclusive

tells us that we have give loss.

as the aggressor here. It means this OI

will be liquidity. If this is also

conclusively D minus, this will be

liquidity and therefore this cannot

sponsor anything that high will be what?

It will be raided. All right. So more

example on that on liquidity. But this

is the basis so that when we get to

liquidity or when we get to imbalances

you will not be confused and you will

get to understand exactly what we are

doing. All right. So that is liquidity

indexes imbalance. Okay. Now to

practically now round off what we have

on opposition rule. Majorly we have been

able to deal with every major thing as

discussed when it comes to position

rule. We have highlighted the fact that

our closing range logic most times for

daily and above and whatn not. So the

next one we want to talk about is now

for all everything we have discussed

here apply as well for sessional but we

want to discuss sessional because the

logic we use for that could vary. So for

sessional major thing we focus on is

usually OPL open price logic. So there

are certain cases where we have gap as

well. If we have gap as well we can use

close open logic. All right. But OPM

majority and the same rule applies. You

don't need previous session to complete

cycle one and all. The same rule of

highest time frame that is conclusive

retains liquidity structure. Lower time

frame that is conclusive based on OPL

retains imbalance what imbalance

structure. So let's say for example I

have

uh this

thing right here. So let's say I have

this.

All right. I have this. Now let's say

this is Brford Brford S+

and under open here S minus New York

open S plus conclusively as seen on this

time frame. So let's say New York now is

conclusive because London that was

active as dominant before is now minus

and New York open first as plus. So that

is accurate. Now let's now say here we

have close that is frank close signal to

us that we now have two sessions. So

whatever first impulse we see there as

well based on open price logic is what

we are using here.

So let's say on this time frame that

concluded as

C minus price and it's now flipped to

C++

is now flipped to C plus. So when it's

flipped to C plus that is that on this

time frame. Now when we now go to the

highest

time frame possible. Now to check for

closing range for example I cannot use 1

hour. I have to use time frame that are

lower 30 minutes and lower to conclude

the highest time frame conclusive. Why?

Because the whole cycle of sessional

closing range the whole cycle is there

is 1 hour. Same thing with Frankfort.

Frankfort registration only occur within

1 hour. The moment London opens no

already over. Same thing with um Sydney.

Sydney only occurs. And you want to ask

what do we really signate to? You really

Sydney to the closing range of New York.

Let's say New York closes by 9:00 p.m.

to that 1 hour movement. What happen

from that 9:00 p.m. The 1 hour movement

before market opens to the 10 p.m. is

what you negate Sydney has. We will say

that in our examples in live practical

classes as it may everything cannot be

put in here. This is just to ensure that

our video but mentorship has to still be

retained because some of you even always

share people's video handing out to

other people and what not. So it's just

basics and live applications and much

more practical examples we'll be seeing

in uh in classes. So let's say what we

have here. So based on this now this you

could have said is liquidity but let's

say all of this was checked on like

let's say 5 minutes time frame and now

when we go to something like 30 minutes

time frame let's say 30 minutes is also

conclusive for the closing range let's

say nothing changes about the New York S

plus nothing changes about it but for

the closing range now let's say

conclusively on 30 minutes the closing

range this this is a single closing

range I'm not talking about two

different closing range now I said this

C minus flip to plus. All right. So

let's say 3 p.m. from close closing

range. So basically here we have on 30

minutes time frame conclusively straight

up our closing range let's say C plus on

30 minutes time frame C plus and it was

C plus as at the aggressor. So that's

the same thing maybe price just clear

the high clear the low met the target

under open price logic OP help meaning

that on the highest conclusive time

frame this low is not liquidity so it

means this low is not liquidity that's

it so it is not liquidity on high time

frame so it is not liquidity but this

retains imbalance structure which means

if price should come back and we have a

sessional liquidity SL all right that

particular

guy qualifies to promote it as imbalance

and it is not lia.

So same application but different what

different logic session most times OP

what open price logic and why does open

price logic work effectively for those

that care to know um or sessional that

that's practically because sessions

overlap all right and there is more

uniqueness in the what in the open price

because the open price is as active as

when live participants are coming in.

All right. When the New York Stock

Exchange exactly opens, when this one

opens and all that. So that's that open

price that they agree to open with

becomes much more important and much

more effective. All right? So like

highly high rates and for closing range

too highly rates except for when you

have gaps. All right? And then you want

to understand that. So that's pretty

much everything about opposition rule

and I've compressed quadrant rule here

but I don't need to start explaining all

the back end of quadrant too. Simply put

the quarter is simply the relationship

of the higher time frame and the lower

time frame which means the higher ZS

time frame time frame has to be checked

and in cases where you want to mark

imbalances you want to mark liquidity

you don't even need to go to once you

see your highest time frame possible and

you see it conclusively you don't need

to check a lower time frame flip or

whatever again at all but if you need

imbalances you want to pick imbalance

zones that sponsor areas then you will

need to compare and contrast with lower

time frame in order to pick imbalance

because why is that a place where you

see let's say you see D plus D minus

here and price has violated that range

or something all right and price has

violated that range or something and now

a liquidity was formed you go stick with

the higher time frame

talk the time frame will purely be

showing you

majorly that's what the time frame will

be showing you the time frame will

majorly be showing you that this was

supply

but meanwhile on a lower time frame say

the higher time frame is 8 hour lower

time frame is 1 hour the lower time

frame this aggressor might actually be

conclusively D minus that flipped to D+

and is still D plus as I here. So that

area where is it flew from D minus to D

plus

shows imbalance a daily imbalance and is

factually real true. So you would have

missed such and wondering weird and you

be wondering what price used. All right.

So to avoid that

um anytime you want to mark imbalance

always remember your lower time frame

and ensure that is right with

the trading plan. So I will see you guys

in the next

one. Okay guys, now you have seen

quadrant road, you have seen how

beautiful it is. Now I am so sure that

you are now confident about your cordon

rule. You are now confident about

picking signals about concluding buyers

and sellers and that will be able to

launch you into more greatness of being

able to you know pick the true liquidity

which we'll discuss in coming videos.

pick the right zones you know we now

understand every other thing because

everything has linked to uh getting

accurate signals have been discussed so

yes um that is it for quadrant 2 and um

that's it for this video guys I will see

you guys on the profitable

[Music]