TRANSCRIPTEnglish

AMD KILLED Intel's 290K Dreams w/ R9 9950X3D2 (+ Arc Pro B70 Analysis)

22m 3s4,411 words612 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:07

So today AMD finally announced the Ryzen

0:09

9 9950X3D2,

0:12

a dual Vcash monster with 208 megabytes

0:14

of cache for both top tier gaming

0:16

performance and top tier professional

0:18

application performance as well. And

0:21

then also today, Intel canled the Ultra

0:23

9 290K Plus. And no matter what people

0:27

try to say online, don't believe them if

0:29

they tell you this was a coincidence.

0:31

There is no way these dual announcements

0:33

on the same day could be a coincidence.

0:36

And uh also make no mistake that Intel

0:39

was planning to launch a 290K. I mean,

0:42

we literally got benchmarks of it months

0:44

ago. I these things were out there.

0:46

Intel was ready to launch it. And really

0:49

what was going on behind the scenes,

0:50

like I've been saying for a long time

0:52

now in multiple pieces of content, is

0:54

that there was a game of chicken going

0:56

on between the 9950 X32 and the 290K

0:59

Plus because Intel knows the 290K Plus

1:03

would have made sense in a world where

1:05

AMD does not launch a faster flagship,

1:07

but it would not make sense outside of

1:09

that. And again, AMD probably doesn't

1:12

want to launch the 9950 X3D2 until they

1:15

feel like they have to to crush Intel.

1:17

And ultimately what we saw today was

1:19

that Intel ended up being the one that

1:21

blinked and decided to pull their

1:22

release. Well, AMD decided it was

1:25

finally time years after Zen 5 actually

1:28

launched to get the new dual Vcash

1:30

flagship out. But of course, all this

1:32

begs a few questions like why would

1:34

Intel blink now? And why did AMD take so

1:37

long to finally release the catalyst

1:39

that killed off any chances of Intel

1:41

trying to compete with the 290K? Well,

1:43

that's really what I'm going to answer

1:45

in today's video. in addition to

1:47

analyzing the release of Intel's new or

1:50

really last GPU flagship, the B70 or Big

1:54

Battle Mage. But first, let's stick with

1:56

the 9950 X3D2 and the 290K. Um,

2:00

undoubtedly, I believe the reason the

2:02

290K isn't coming out is because Intel

2:05

finally knew for a fact that AMD was

2:08

going to pull the trigger on the 9950

2:09

XD2. And and and don't kid yourself,

2:12

there's been rumors of a 9950 XD2 coming

2:14

out and really since Zen 5 launched. I

2:17

mean, even Leo from K Guru came on

2:20

Broken Silicon and said that he knew it

2:21

was out there, that he knew people

2:22

personally who had the CPU physically in

2:25

their hands. And it was just a matter of

2:27

will if AMD wanted to launch this thing

2:30

that used extra Vcash capacity. Because

2:32

as long as AMD can easily continue to

2:35

dominate with the 9950 X3D not dual

2:38

Vcash variant, the one they already have

2:40

out, that thing's cheaper to produce and

2:42

doesn't use up as much of the Vcash

2:44

capacity that they could be using to

2:45

just make tons of those eight cores that

2:47

keep dominating Amazon's CPU best

2:50

seller. However, AMD would have had to

2:52

have taken the launch of a 290K Plus

2:54

seriously once they saw its brethren,

2:55

the 270 and 250K launch and then set

2:59

into motion Intel making the decision,

3:01

can we really compete with that at a

3:02

attractive price that makes sense? And

3:04

the answer was no. And the 290K Plus was

3:07

cancelled. Now, why though wouldn't it

3:10

be competitive? Well, let me get into

3:11

the two main reasons. The first reason

3:13

is that it really wouldn't have even

3:15

really made sense compared to the 270K

3:17

because it wouldn't be that much faster.

3:18

Remember the 270K has the full 24 cores.

3:21

The only difference between the 270K and

3:23

290K would be clock speed. And in

3:25

reality, I'm not sure even how much

3:26

higher that clock speed would be. We saw

3:28

no clock speed increase between the

3:30

Ultra 7265K and the now released 270K

3:33

Plus. And so I think I'm being generous

3:36

when I assume maybe they'd get 100 MHz

3:38

more out of it. And if they did, we're

3:40

looking at about 5% higher clocks

3:42

between the 290K and the 270K that's

3:45

already being sold for rock bottom

3:47

prices at $300. And so then let's take

3:49

AMD's numbers that they put out, which I

3:51

believe we can trust. They don't look

3:52

insane to me at all. And compare what a

3:54

9950 X3D2 would look like compared to

3:57

A290K. And we see that well, yes, in

4:00

some things like Blender, they'd

4:01

probably be a tie. Then we go to V-Ray,

4:04

AMD would dominate by double digits. And

4:06

in gaming, I mean, good lord, they'd

4:08

probably end up winning by 30% or more.

4:11

And doing so, by the way, with greater

4:13

efficiency. Not enough people are

4:14

talking about this, but Aerake refresh,

4:16

it's a powerhog. A 5.8 GHz version would

4:19

probably feel almost like Raptor Lake

4:21

again. I mean, look at this here. AMD is

4:23

vastly more efficient, especially at

4:25

gaming. Intel's only doing better here

4:28

because they've gone back to their power

4:29

hogging ways. And so in reality, the

4:32

only reason you would get any of these

4:34

Aerolic refresh products is because of a

4:37

attractive price. And that is what all

4:40

reviewers said. In fact, Gamers Nexus or

4:42

Steve at Gamers Nexus directly said

4:44

this.

4:45

>> It's way better than the 285K. I mean,

4:46

that CPU was a [ __ ] nightmare. Like

4:49

their their 200 series launch was just

4:51

awful. Uh we knew they were launching

4:53

onto a dead-end platform. We got a

4:56

refresh, so that's good. But that plus

4:59

the fact that the CPUs were regressive

5:01

versus the 14 series. It was just bad.

5:04

It was. And the prices were pretty high

5:06

too. They were like out of their [ __ ]

5:07

minds with the $600 CPU thing. They were

5:09

doing plus or minus 50 bucks sometimes.

5:11

And I am sure Intel saw these things and

5:15

said, "We tested the waters. We launched

5:17

the Ultra 5 and Ultra 7. People do like

5:20

it, but everyone says if it cost a scent

5:22

more, it'd be hard to recommend. The

5:23

290K would cost far more than just a

5:26

cent more." And so we are cancelling it.

5:28

And to anyone that says, well, why not

5:30

just make it 350 or something, guys, uh

5:34

I I gotta tell you, they probably

5:36

wouldn't have that many golden sample

5:38

yields. And these things are more

5:39

expensive to make than AMD. So, well,

5:41

Intel is probably willing to fight some

5:43

kind of a price war in the $200 to $300

5:46

region against AMD's, you know, Ultra 7s

5:48

and Ultra Fives. That's probably only

5:50

because they're getting rid of

5:52

overstocked Aerolate because nobody

5:54

bought it. It's been a complete sales

5:56

failure. That's why it's so cheap is to

5:57

get rid of it. Um, if they tried to go

6:00

for even 400, 350 for some flagship and

6:03

it actually hurt AMD. AMD's processors

6:06

right now cost vastly less to make than

6:08

Intel. I've covered that in dozens of

6:09

videos. I'll put one on screen right now

6:11

that really gets into it a little bit if

6:12

you want to learn about that. But the

6:14

point is, if Intel tried to be

6:15

aggressive with pricing and it actually

6:17

hurt AMD, AMD could price the 9950 XRD2

6:20

cheaper than whatever Intel could do for

6:21

the 290K. And so, well, there you go.

6:24

That's what happened. AMD saw the Plus

6:27

products come out. They pulled the

6:29

trigger on the 9950X3D2. Intel saw that

6:31

the only reason anyone would get their

6:33

product is because it is cheap and

6:35

there's no way it could be cheap enough

6:36

to compete with what AMD is bringing to

6:38

the table if they got into a real price

6:39

war. And really, the thing would

6:41

probably have been a power hog that

6:43

would be impossible to recommend over

6:45

the Ultra 7 if it cost even $50 more.

6:47

And it surely would have. And that is

6:48

why the 290K was cancelled today. All

6:51

right. And now I want to move on to

6:53

talking about well another Intel product

6:56

that was announced this week, the B70 or

6:58

big battle mage after an ad from a

7:01

sponsor. This piece of content is

7:04

brought to you by David. So for the past

7:06

few months, me and actually especially

7:08

my girlfriend have been loving the

7:09

packages of David protein bars that we

7:11

had sent to us for this ad. And look,

7:14

while I always do actually like the

7:16

things that I recommend, I do try them

7:17

and I wouldn't make an ad about them if

7:18

I didn't like them. David has stood out

7:20

as one of our favorite things that I've

7:22

been sponsored by because we keep eating

7:24

them months after the ad deal started.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.

    AMD KILLED Intel's 290… - Full Transcript | YouTubeTranscript.dev