TRANSCRIPTEnglish

FiiO JT7 Review - $119 Planar Benchmark Headphone?

18m 0s4,102 words556 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Today I had I had fo for lunch.

0:03

>> Oh yeah.

0:04

>> Like you know like the Vietnamese soup.

0:06

And

0:06

>> do

0:07

Yes, I know what it is.

0:08

>> Yeah. And I I spilled the soup I just I

0:12

I dropped my soup spoon into the bowl

0:14

and it splashed soup directly onto my

0:17

crotch and has left this particular

0:20

stain on my pants that makes me look

0:22

like I've aggressively pissed myself.

0:24

And I had to walk from the faux place

0:26

all the way back to my apartment and

0:28

past all the people along the way.

0:29

>> Yeah. They all think you peed your pants

0:31

like a little baby. Like a little baby

0:32

boy.

0:33

>> That's right. Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, that's

0:36

what I'm dealing with today. But, uh,

0:38

how how are you doing?

0:39

>> I'm chilling.

0:43

>> All right. So, today we're going to talk

0:45

about the FIO JT7. And it's a overear

0:48

openback planer magnetic headphone that

0:50

is like $120. It's It's super

0:52

inexpensive, which is awesome. When I

0:55

got this sent to me, this is shout out

0:56

to Fio for sending it, by the way. It

0:58

came in the most adorable tiny package,

1:00

and that's because they also fold. And I

1:03

thought that there's no way there's a

1:04

headphone in here. But but there is. So,

1:06

but that was pretty cool, dude. I

1:08

thought exactly the same thing. Yeah, I

1:09

love the packaging. It's It's very small

1:11

in a nice little compact form factor.

1:13

And the fact that it's folded was also

1:15

Yeah. a surprise. And it's really

1:16

lightweight. And yeah, I mean, yeah. How

1:20

How does it fit on your head? Is it is

1:21

it chill?

1:22

>> It fits spectacularly. Uh this is very

1:26

much reminiscent of the HD490 Pro from

1:28

Sennheiser for its mechanical and

1:30

ergonomic design. And this is one of

1:32

those things if you're going to emulate

1:33

stuff from somebody, emulate the good

1:35

stuff, right? And it seems like they're

1:37

they're going for that kind of design.

1:38

Even if it's not intentional, it's a

1:40

it's a nice coincidence because it's

1:41

it's awesome for its mechanical design.

1:43

>> Yeah, pretty much full agree. I do wish

1:45

it had maybe a little bit more head

1:46

padding. I have a smaller head. This

1:48

thing fits on my head without extending

1:49

the headband rods at all, but that does

1:51

tend to mean I get a little bit more

1:52

weight on top than distributed with

1:54

clamp. Yeah. No, it's uh it fits me uh

1:57

at the smallest. Uh I assume it fits you

1:59

and you don't need to go really near the

2:01

largest.

2:02

>> It fits me fine. It's a little just a

2:04

little bit of clamp force, but I think

2:06

it's it's not in a way that I feel uh

2:08

bad about it. It's like it puts a little

2:10

bit of pressure on the side of my head

2:11

that's kind of like it reminds me of

2:12

when I went to get the endoscopy done

2:14

where the nurse presses my head into the

2:16

pillow and tells me to stop crying. It

2:17

feels a little bit like that. But so

2:19

it's like it's like a pressure but in a

2:20

nice way. Anyway, there's a snug kind of

2:23

pressure when I wear it for my larger

2:25

head, larger than average head. So you

2:27

you'll notice that I have some different

2:28

pads on here right now and that's

2:29

because uh they also sent a whole bunch

2:31

of different pads for me to try and you

2:32

can pad swap these with your heart's

2:34

content. And we'll get into the sound of

2:35

the different pads in a moment, but I

2:37

just want to note as part of the

2:39

mechanical design. The pad swapping is

2:41

very easy cuz it's just this lip pad

2:43

ring lip around the edge of the baffle.

2:46

And uh you can pop on different pads to

2:48

your heart's content. And I like this

2:49

better than clip systems where you have

2:51

to use whatever proprietary clip uh

2:54

thing that they whatever pad they made

2:56

work with their proprietary clip system

2:58

like they did with the FD13. I prefer

2:59

this. So this is this is nice. One thing

3:02

to note is that if you are going to be

3:04

swapping pads aggressively, be very

3:06

careful not to touch the membrane or the

3:09

anything to do that's in in between the

3:11

magnets because uh the with planer

3:14

magnetics they're very very very fragile

3:16

and they're just sort of exposed to the

3:17

elements there without a pad on it. So

3:19

just be careful of that.

3:20

>> I haven't weighed mine but I think the

3:21

stated weight is like around 320 gram

3:24

and [music] you know for a planer

3:25

magnetic headphone I feel like that's

3:27

that's pretty damn light isn't it? Like

3:29

I I felt like when I took it out of the

3:30

box, you know, I was hit by that initial

3:32

like, yeah, this feels cheap. [music]

3:34

But like, as I've been using it, I've

3:36

kind of been loving how lightweight it

3:37

is for a planar cuz that's usually kind

3:40

of the price you pay um for an

3:42

inexpensive planar. Um most of them that

3:44

are around this price also kind of have

3:46

worse headbands in terms of just comfort

3:49

and weight distribution. So I think

3:51

there are maybe some things I would

3:52

change, but for this price, it's it's

3:54

very hard for me to be upset at this

3:56

mechanical design. It's like a little

3:58

bit cheaper feeling for the plastic

4:00

pieces than what you'd expect on like

4:01

the 490 Pro, but like uh that's that's

4:03

it.

4:04

>> Yeah, but not as much as you would think

4:05

for the price differential.

4:06

>> You obviously got a got a taste of how I

4:08

felt about the sound from the members

4:10

stream. I've since spent more time

4:12

listening to it. I have some general

4:14

thoughts, but I I think the things that

4:16

I said in the members stream uh hold up.

4:19

I have a similar sense of it now that I

4:21

did before, which is that I don't love

4:23

the sound, but I would I would not be

4:26

mad at this for 120 bucks or whatever it

4:28

is, right? Like I just with the default

4:30

pads, you know, out of the box, it's uh

4:33

it's a little bit shouty and a little

4:34

bit blunted. Not quite as nice as the

4:37

FT1 Pro for the treble, but overall it

4:40

was there's not so much that I could

4:41

complain about at this price. Um, what

4:43

about you?

4:44

>> Yeah, like very similar thoughts. Uh, I

4:47

was I was pretty surprised when I took

4:49

it out of the box and listened to it.

4:51

Like that first like two minutes or

4:52

three minutes listening to it, I was

4:54

just like, "Yeah, dude. I'm jamming.

4:55

This is this is totally totally cool."

4:57

For $120.

4:58

>> Does doesn't suck.

5:00

>> Absolutely does not suck. Uh, yeah. When

5:02

you spend a little bit more time with

5:03

it, you know, you do kind of notice

5:05

there's this glare like in the in the

5:07

upper mid-range to presence region

5:08

transition like that 3 to 4 kHz area.

5:10

There was another peak on my head around

5:12

like 6K and then another around like 13

5:14

14K. you know, typical planar headphone

5:17

things. But, uh, I think as an overall

5:19

package, like I was surprised that it it

5:21

didn't come across as bright in terms of

5:23

its overall tilt to me. Like the first

5:25

thing I was hit with was kind of the

5:26

warmth in the in the bass and mid-range.

5:28

There was this kind of coziness. It's a

5:30

little bit stuffy, but, you know, chill.

5:33

Uh, and then, you know, once I started

5:34

listening to more music, the treble

5:35

problems became more apparent. But, you

5:37

know, I think for people that are

5:39

looking for an inexpensive headphone,

5:40

this is like a take on this kind of

5:42

hi-fi man and now FD1 Pro like signature

5:45

that has some upsides versus things like

5:48

the FD1 Pro and some downsides uh which

5:50

we can get into.

5:52

>> Let's talk about some of the upsides.

5:53

The FT1 Pro also had [music] pretty good

5:56

bass just by default without EQ. I think

5:58

the bass on this is better.

5:59

>> Yeah. No, full agree. Yeah. Like easy

6:02

agree. integrated leak uh getting that

6:04

air gap base res base boost behavior

6:07

which is really nice and importantly

6:09

does not have the excursion limit issues

6:12

that the FT1 Pro has. So if you did want

6:15

to EQ this in the bass you could go even

6:16

higher. You could give it more. So I I

6:19

would describe the bass as like not this

6:21

textured or round or rich bass. It's

6:23

more of like a thudding plotting kind of

6:25

bass but that is better I think than

6:29

many planars that are just like

6:30

flatliner bass all the way across.

6:31

Right. So, um, it it has enough presence

6:34

there to kind of, uh, be the ballast for

6:37

the ear gain. That's intense on this

6:39

headphone.

6:40

>> Yeah. And that's kind of what I want to

6:41

touch on actually is the relationship to

6:42

the ear gain. Cuz, yeah, I totally

6:44

agree. It is better than the FT1 Pro.

6:46

And I think a lot of it has to do with

6:48

what's going on in its relationship to

6:50

the ear gain. So, when it comes to like

6:52

bass instruments, like bass guitars

6:54

don't necessarily sound that much better

6:56

to me. They sound very similar, but the

6:59

kick drum sound uh is marketkedly

7:02

different. Um, and I think it's because

7:03

that 3 to 5 kHz push on JT7 does kind of

7:08

bring forth a little bit more like

7:09

clackiness and a little bit more of that

7:11

like hardness [music] to specifically

7:14

kick drums. That makes them like more

7:17

more palpably like punchy than something

7:19

like an F21 Pro or like an Edition XS or

7:22

something like that. So, you get that,

7:23

you know, fun base relationship, but the

7:26

price you pay is that, yeah, that upper

7:28

mid-range push is more forward than it

7:30

was on the FT1 Pro, and it was already

7:32

kind of problematic there. So, I I do I

7:34

do find it to be a little bit too glary,

7:36

a little bit scratchy of a listen.

7:37

>> Things I don't like about this, as you

7:39

said, the kind of glary presentation for

7:42

the low treble. I don't know, the ear

7:43

gain transition there, but that's I I

7:45

kind of didn't like that about the FT1

7:47

Pro as well. Well, like I'm not sure if

7:48

it's exactly there, but that that for me

7:50

was a little overbearing, that sort of

7:51

ear gain rise. Uh, the other thing that

7:54

I don't like about this is it does sound

7:56

a little bit blunted to me. And I

7:57

realize the reason why is is that it's

8:00

it's a bit sort of upy- downy throughout

8:03

the rest of the treble. And I find that

8:05

this is one where I notice the dips a

8:07

little bit more. So, there's a little

8:08

there's a sense of dullness that that um

8:11

and a sort of unrefinedness that comes

8:12

through. But, I wouldn't say that this

8:14

is like harsh or fatiguing. It's not

8:16

like there's a a stride and see or like

8:18

a a siblance going on. It's just a

8:21

little bit on the on the duller side for

8:22

me. But how did you get on with it?

8:24

>> Yeah, I mean much much the same

8:25

complaint. Again, the the upper

8:27

mid-range is kind of a problem. Uh but

8:29

also I did find that there was some

8:31

roughness in the treble. Like there's

8:33

again a 6k peak and then like a 8k dip

8:36

and then it comes back up with a

8:38

vengeance in the upper treble as planers

8:40

usually do. So, I did find it has this

8:42

kind of dark bright characteristic where

8:44

there is a little bit of muffliness due

8:46

to the upper mid-range recession around

8:48

2 kHz and then the dip around 8k, but

8:50

then there's also this brightness on

8:52

certain elements um like vocal siblance

8:55

and symbols and stuff like that. Um, so

8:58

it it definitely isn't a very refined

9:00

treble presentation overall, but I do

9:04

think the sense of overall tilt between

9:06

like bass and treble is actually quite

9:08

even such that again when I was first

9:10

listening to it, I didn't I didn't get

9:12

anything that smacked of an immediate

9:14

problem, right? And I I would assume the

9:16

same happened to you. And I think I

9:17

think the same is probably going to be

9:18

true for most people who pick up this

9:19

headphone and listen to it for the first

9:21

time. Nothing's really disastrously

9:23

wrong with it. There are just these

9:24

these things that become clear with the

9:26

closer listening.

9:27

>> Yep. The the upy downiness. Uh let's get

9:29

into the the pad swaps and some of the

9:31

different pad some of the changes that

9:33

that uh create. So the default pads

9:35

we've shown you the measurements of the

9:36

default pads. Fio were kind enough to

9:38

send over three additional pads for me.

9:40

That's the FT1 A, B, and C versions. The

9:43

C versions are kind of similar to the

9:46

default pads. They're a little bit

9:48

smaller for the ear opening. The

9:49

performance on them is pretty similar in

9:51

terms of it has a similar characteristic

9:53

overall for the ear gain and the treble.

9:55

The B pads are the ones that are on here

9:57

right now are the most interesting to

9:59

me. They're more this kind of velvet

10:01

material. They feel really nice. They're

10:04

very comfortable. And I found that they

10:07

also make it less shouty. So they they

10:09

I'm not going to say that fully fixed

10:11

the overall character of that ear gain

10:13

presentation, the lower treble kind of

10:15

glariness, but it it reduces it by a

10:18

notable amount.

10:18

>> [music]

10:19

>> and the whole thing kind of gets a

10:20

little bit warmer. So, while it still

10:22

has that somewhat blunted characteristic

10:24

that I talked about with the default

10:26

sound signature, the upy downiness is

10:28

still there, the relationship, I guess,

10:30

for a more broadband kind of

10:31

characterization of the ear gain and

10:34

then the rest of the treble is a bit

10:36

more balanced so that it doesn't come

10:38

across as fatiguing or glaring and it's

10:40

more versatile, I find. And then there's

10:42

the FT1A pads which are this leather or

10:44

leatherrett material. And those ones do

10:47

not work so great. They kind of

10:49

emphasize the shout I found and made the

10:51

all of the rest of the treble more dark

10:54

and dull and blunted sounding. So if I

10:56

had a recommendation for a pad swap, it

10:58

would be the velvet pads. Uh but again,

11:01

I went kind of back and forth with the

11:02

velvet pads and the default pads. And I

11:04

found it while it sounded different, it

11:06

wasn't like an obvious leveling up. It

11:08

was just a little bit different and

11:10

probably in a way that was better for

11:12

me.

11:12

>> I don't have any of those FIO pads. I

11:14

just had a pair of like Yaki TH900 pads

11:17

that I tried and they kind of like

11:18

reshaped the ear gain a little bit like

11:20

brought forth the 1K. Uh dipped a little

11:22

bit of the ear gain and treble for sure.

11:24

I wasn't sure I preferred it cuz yeah,

11:26

it did kind of expose more of that kind

11:28

of [music] dippiness in the in the mid

11:30

treble for me while still being again

11:32

too too bright in the air. So I kind of

11:35

just rolled with stock pads. Uh, and I

11:37

was chilling with that. But, you know,

11:39

again, it is one of these things where

11:40

because it just has that simple lip

11:41

design and it's just kind of like a

11:42

simple circle. Uh, you can throw a ton

11:44

of different types of pads on there. So,

11:46

I know Done probably has a bunch that

11:48

fit on there. [music] Um, Yaki probably

11:49

has others that fit on there. So, you

11:51

know, if you want a cheap headphone just

11:53

to experiment with pad rolling that's

11:54

like well extended uh, and comfortable

11:57

just on a chassis level, the JT7 seems

11:59

like a great choice for that, honestly.

12:00

>> Uh, let's get into EQ and potentially

12:04

some foibless here. You can do lots with

12:07

EQ. You can basically turn this into

12:09

something that sounds incredible if you

12:10

want to, it's a good platform for it

12:12

because not only is it not excursion

12:13

limited, which means that it's not going

12:15

to have the clipping issue that the FT1

12:17

Pro had. Um, it's also ergonomically

12:19

great, mechanically welldesigned, so

12:21

it's makes sense to do that. U, the

12:23

concern that I have, a little bit of a

12:25

concern here is that there's quite a lot

12:27

of harmonic distortion for this once you

12:30

push it to like, you know, crazy volumes

12:32

like 110 dB and stuff like that. uh

12:34

right at 5.3 5.4 kHz like it's it's

12:38

intense for the harmonic distortion.

12:40

We're talking like 30%. So there there

12:43

is a limit to this to this driver.

12:45

Basically at 100 dB after that you start

12:48

getting some pretty wild harmonic

12:50

distortion behavior in the treble which

12:52

is not great. So that's where I say it's

12:55

it's kind of limited in in the EQ sense

12:57

for EQ potential there. I mean, whether

12:59

you're going to hear this with music is

13:01

another question, but I I would just be

13:03

cautious about how much I push things.

13:04

>> Yeah, just definitely don't push things

13:06

in that region. Like, if you're if

13:07

you're going to boost, uh, you know, the

13:10

bass is probably a safe place to do it.

13:12

And thankfully, in this region, most

13:13

people will be cutting, but yeah,

13:14

definitely something people are going to

13:15

want to look out for.

13:17

>> That's basically all that I have to say

13:18

about it. Is there anything that you

13:20

want to compare this to? Um, like is

13:22

this is this in your mind the new

13:23

default go-to at around $120? I think

13:26

the main competition there is going to

13:28

be the H400 SE from Hi-Fi Man right

13:30

below it and the FD1 Pro right above it.

13:33

And I'm going to say right now like I'm

13:34

not really sure the FD1 Pro is worth the

13:37

money over this. Like they're very

13:38

similar. Frankly, I just like the

13:40

comfort of the JT7 considerably more.

13:42

It's less heavy. Um I also kind of just

13:44

like the way it looks a little bit more

13:45

as well. Versus the HT400SE. I do prefer

13:48

it to the AT400SE. I just find its mids

13:51

to be a little bit more textured [music]

13:52

and alive feeling. And I find the treble

13:56

of H400 SE to be quite annoying in a way

13:59

the JT7 isn't quite as badass. It's a

14:02

little bit more expensive, but I do

14:04

think because it's a lot more

14:06

comfortable and it's more extended in

14:08

the bass uh and it just kind of sounds

14:10

better in stock configuration. I think

14:11

if people can yeah spend a little bit

14:13

more money, the JT7 is going to be

14:16

better than the H400 [music] SE for most

14:18

people. I think

14:19

>> so. So, I would take the JT7 over the

14:21

H400 SC purely for its mechanical

14:24

design. Forget the sound quality. This

14:26

design is better. But, but the reality

14:27

is that people aren't going to be doing

14:28

EQ as much as we are. [laughter]

14:31

Say stock sound, no changes to anything,

14:33

no changes to pads or anything like that

14:35

cuz that costs money as well. Uh, would

14:37

I take the H400 SE over the JT7? I think

14:40

it's close. And the things that I like

14:42

about each of them are different and the

14:44

things that I dislike about each of them

14:45

are different. It kind of just depends.

14:46

Like if I'm more averse to this kind of

14:48

like shouty or blunted kind of sound, I

14:50

would probably choose the H400 SE.

14:52

>> Yeah. Yeah. H400 SE is definitely more

14:54

chill.

14:54

>> But if I'm like averse to the treble

14:56

spikes like the 9 kHz resonance of death

14:58

on the H400 SE or if I want that bass, a

15:01

little bit better bass quality, I'm

15:03

going with the the JT7. But then

15:05

compared to the FT1 Pro, stock sound, no

15:08

EQ, I would choose the FT1 Pro. I still

15:10

think that it sounds notably better

15:12

because it's not as shouty and it's not

15:14

as upy- downy. It's it's a step up to go

15:17

to the FT1 Pro. But then again, it's

15:19

like it's it's it's hard to really say

15:21

this would be meaningfully worse if you

15:23

did EQ because that one is excursion

15:25

limited in the bass. And I always love

15:27

headphones where it's like all you need

15:28

to do is add a bass boost. Maybe this

15:30

one you do a little bit more, but like

15:31

at least with this one you can add a

15:32

bass boost. It's not going to clip. So

15:34

>> yeah. So So maybe maybe that is the

15:35

difference. Like I I am thinking about

15:37

it in terms of like if I would like

15:38

which I would rather own and because the

15:40

JT7's mechanical design and weight

15:42

specifically is better than the FT1 Pro.

15:45

It would be my choice. I think in terms

15:47

of stock sound profile like yeah FD1 Pro

15:49

is just a little bit smoother, a little

15:51

bit more refined, a little bit easier to

15:52

listen to, but I do kind of find it more

15:54

sleepy and just kind of softer in a way

15:56

that I was surprised the JT7 didn't uh

16:00

really sound that sleepy to me. like at

16:02

that price, I think it's, you know, more

16:05

technical than probably either of them.

16:06

That's kind of why I'm into it. But, you

16:08

know, I I totally like understand the

16:10

perspective and agree that if someone

16:11

isn't EQing at all, uh the FT1 Pro is

16:14

probably going to be the safer [music]

16:15

pick and maybe the one that's a little

16:17

bit more of an all-rounder for more

16:18

people.

16:18

>> So, we've been doing scores up on

16:20

headphones.com. If you want to check

16:21

that out, that'll be linked in the

16:22

description. You go to headphones.com,

16:24

click on the ranking list, and then

16:25

you'll be able to see our rankings for

16:26

this. Uh Griffin, how would you score

16:28

the JT7 for sound quality and then

16:30

overall? So, [music] in terms of sound

16:32

quality, it's a 4.95 out of 10 for me.

16:36

Uh, if you want to round it up to a

16:37

five, go ahead and do it. I certainly

16:39

would. I think totally competent

16:41

headphone. Totally reasonable price. And

16:43

then when you uh bring in the overall,

16:45

which includes kind of the value and the

16:47

comfort and that stuff, I give it a 5.5.

16:49

I mean, it's not a headphone I'm in love

16:51

with by any means, but I think it's a

16:53

solid entry, and uh I think it's a

16:55

headphone that deserves to exist. How

16:57

about you?

16:57

>> I rate this lower. I rate this at around

17:00

a four. Well, I like the bass, so maybe

17:03

I'll bump it up to a 4.2. But it's funny

17:06

because I've rated other headphones in

17:07

the past where it was like I really

17:08

liked one aspect of it, but another

17:10

thing was a major dealbreaker. There's

17:12

not really any major dealbreakers with

17:13

this. It's like they're better and worse

17:15

qualities about it, but nothing is like,

17:17

you know, I actively hate this part

17:19

about this headphone. So, it's it's just

17:21

competent and decent all around. And so,

17:23

as a result, it's going to get Yeah,

17:25

I'll give it a 4 point. I'll give it a

17:27

4.2 too for sound quality. And then

17:29

overall, I'm going to bump this up to a

17:31

five because the comfort and the

17:32

ergonomics are very good. It's one of

17:34

the best mechanically designed

17:35

headphones [music] um at any price. So,

17:38

uh really good, really good for that.

17:40

And yeah, I I recommend it at $120.

17:42

Can't complain. I would not be mad, as I

17:44

said in my live stream. All right, and

17:46

that's going to do it for this video.

17:47

Let us know if you guys have heard this

17:48

headphone. How did you get on with it?

17:49

But otherwise, if you want to chat with

17:50

us, you can do so at our forum at

17:52

forum.adphones.com or in our Discord,

17:53

also linked below. And until next time,

17:55

we'll see you guys later. Bye for now.

17:56

Bye guys.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.