OpenAI Gets $110 BILLION Bailout... Anthropic Goes to War

The single biggest ever round of funding

has just been completed by Open AI. Sam

Alortman has just announced they have

secured 110 billion. That is over double

the amount they managed last year, which

was the previous record for the amount

that was actually generated in a funding

round. This is from Amazon. It's from

Nvidia and it's from Soft Bank. Sam says

this over on Twitter. We have raised 110

billion round of funding from Amazon,

Nvidia, and SoftBank. We are grateful

for the support from our partners and

have a lot of work to do to bring you

the tools that you deserve. We are

excited to partner with Amazon to bring

a new generation of products to market,

especially around new enterprise

products like the stateful runtime

environment. We're also very excited to

make great use of Tranium, which is of

course Amazon's TPU. We continue to have

great relationship with Microsoft. Uh

Microsoft have also issued a statement

as well. um as stateless API will remain

exclusive to Azour and we will build out

much more capacity with them. Nvidia has

been long one of our most important

partners and their chips are the

foundation of AI computing. We are

grateful for their continued trust in us

and excited to run their systems in AWS.

Their upcoming generation should be

great. SoftBank is an incredible high

conviction partner. We are excited to

welcome them again as a major investor

and to do much more across their

ecosystem. So obviously this is massive

news in the whole AI world. This means

the likes of your memory prices, the

likes of your storage prices, the likes

of your GPUs, they are going to

continue, I'm afraid, to be a pain up

the ass because this level of investment

is insane. It has also got to be said

this is again the continuation of that

circular investing. This is companies

Amazon, it is companies like Nvidia.

Well, it's not like it is these

companies. Uh, SoftBank is a little bit

different as they're a financial

investment company. But when you're

looking at Nvidia, when you're looking

at Amazon, they are investing into

OpenAI to give OpenAI the ability to

then give them the money back to then

sell them more of their well their

products, whether that's TPUs from

Amazon, whether that's uh GPUs from

Nvidia or most likely TPUs from Nvidia

as well at some point as they are

moving. Remember they acquired Grock and

not Elon Musk's AI bot, but Grock, the

TPU manufacturer and designer. So they

are moving into that space as well. But

this is bonkers levels of investment. If

this money is there, if this money is

real, I'm afraid it means that well,

yeah, RAM is going to continue to be

violently expensive. Now Samman speaks

to CNBC and uh as again you can see the

the headline of their article and we we

won't watch the video because it's too

long, but what we'll do is just break

this down. So they say obviously 100

billion 110 billion has been raised um

and that's more than uh what was raised

more than double from last year. Um

Amazon invested 50 billion Nvidia has

invested 30 billion and SoftBank has

invested 30 billion in the round. OpenAI

said in a release on Friday the

investment boasts uh boosts sorry OpenAI

to a 730

billion pre- money valuation which marks

a big jump from its 500 billion

valuation in a secondary financing in

October. Other investors are expected to

join as the round progresses OpenAI said

so this could get even bigger. Remember

Sam Alma went to the Middle East. He's

obviously been flirting with other

countries and other investments and

other companies and everything else. Um,

so who knows where this number is going

to go. We're super excited about this

deal. Open AAI uh Sam Alman told CNBC's

Squirtbox on Friday. AI is going to

happen everywhere. It's transforming the

whole economy and the world needs a lot

of collective cube computing power to

meet the demand. In addition to its

participation in the funding round,

Amazon announced a multi-year strategic

partnership with OpenAI. The companies

will develop customized models that will

help power Amazon's customerf facing

applications as part of the agreement.

According to a release, OpenAI said that

it's expecting its 38 billion agreement

with Amazon Web Services um expanding

sorry expanding it by 100 billion over

the next 8 years. AWS will also serve as

the exclusive third party cloud

distribution provider for OpenAI's

enterprise platform Frontier which it

unveiled earlier this month which again

is a direct competitor to the likes of

Anthropic. The company said Amazon's 50

billion investment in open AAI will

start with initial commitment of 15

billion followed by another 35 billion

in the coming months when certain

conditions are met. Now these conditions

um were well they've been reported on

that they're essentially if open AI

makes artificial general intelligence so

an artificial intelligence that's on the

same level as a human then they will get

the rest of this money or if they go

public then they'll get the rest of this

money. So this might be an indication

that there's going to be some form of

IPO with uh OpenAI. And again, the thing

with an with an IPO of OpenAI, so it's

initial public offering, them listing on

a stock market would be uh what's going

to happen? That could annihilate the

entire economy because if they get

smashed and there's a huge selloff, it

will affect every company inside the AI

complex. So I'm very sure they will only

do that if two things are met. The first

one, they are running out of money. They

need to do it to keep their company

alive. It's the only way they can secure

funding. And they've actually shown us

that they can secure funding from other

companies at the moment currently. But

whether that's going to continue in the

next couple of years, who knows whether

they can generate the amount of money

they require for their 600 billion plus

investment in data center buildouts um

and compute buildout by 2030. Again, who

knows? The other um sort of way of

looking at it is if it becomes the right

time to do it, if AI genuinely does

start transforming the world, then open

AI will IPO because then it will almost

be a no-brainer. Obviously, at the

moment, this is all up in the air and

it's not really I mean, what does it

transform? Uh it's so early right now in

the AI space and OpenAI is off to an

amazing start. Amazon CEO Andy Jasse

told CNBC Squatbox on Friday, they're

going to be one of the very big winners.

We believe longterm I think we can help

them quite a bit as part of this

partnership. OpenAI said Friday that

nothing is about uh that nothing about

its announcement in any way changes its

terms of partnership with Microsoft. Now

I'm going to show you the Microsoft

thing in a moment but you've got to

remember Microsoft obviously are

distancing themselves from OpenAI. Um

and they also don't want to be seen to

be left behind because again that will

affect their share price if OpenAI does

go parabolic. So there's all a little

bit of back and forth. We're still

friends. We're still loving it. Yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. and all that

crap. Um, in the 3 years plus, uh, in

the three years plus since launching

chat chat

since what chat PGT [laughter] great

reported here, OpenAI has reshaped the

technology industry and defined an era

of generative artificial intelligence.

But the company has to keep reeling in

cash in order to finance its ambitions,

particularly in paying for its graphics

processing units, GPUs, and

infrastructure. Uh, as part of it

announcement on Friday, Open II said

it's expanding its long-standing

collaboration with Nvidia, which

dominates the GPU market. OpenAI will

use 3 GW of dedicated inference capacity

and 2 GW of training capacity on

Nvidia's Vera Rubin systems. Those are

the new Nvidia chips, which I don't

think they're available yet, but they're

they're starting to roll out. I think

they're in production or something. Um,

OpenI has been telling investors that

it's now targeting roughly 600 billion

in total compute spend by 2030, months

after Sam Alman touted 1.4 4 trillion

infrastructure commitments. The company

is providing a lower number and more

defined timeline for its planned

spending. Sources told CNBC as broader

concerns mounted that the expansion

ambitions were too great for the

potential revenue that would follow.

While OpenAI continues to lead the

consumer AI market, it faces

intensifying competition from Google's

Gemini and is trying to ramp up its

offerings for the enterprise market

where rival Anthropic has an early lead.

OpenAI is projecting that its total

revenue for 2030 will be more than 280

billion with nearly equal contributions

from its consumer and enterprise

businesses, said the sources who asked

not to be named because the information

is private. Okay, here's the joint

statement between OpenAI and Microsoft.

Again, remember this is all about

optics. Microsoft is so heavily down the

rabbit hole of shove absolutely dog [ __ ]

AI into everything. Everything is a

co-pilot assisted bag of [ __ ] that they

cannot be seen to be left behind. but

they're also moving away from open AI,

but they also don't want to just like

rip the cord cuz that might cause way

too much damage. So, you've got this

back and forth where it's everyone's

friends, right? So, this is what they

say. Um, since 2019, Microsoft and Open

have worked together to advance

artificial intelligence responsibly and

to make its benefits broadly accessible.

What began as a research partnership has

grown into one of the most consequential

collaborations in technology, grounded

in mutual trust, deep technical

integration, and long-term commitment to

innovation. This has totally not been

generated by AI. By the way, it probably

has. [laughter]

As as conversations around AI

investments and partnerships grow and as

OpenAI announces new funding and its new

partners, as they did today, we want to

ensure these announcements are

understood within the existing construct

of our partnership. Nothing about

today's announcement in any way changes

[clears throat] the terms of Microsoft

and Open AI's relationship that have

been previously shared in our joint blog

in October 2025. The partnership remains

strong and central and it's in bold.

Good lord. Microsoft and Open AI

continue to work closely across

research, engineering, product

development, building on years of deep

collaboration and shared success. Our IP

relationship continues unhinged. Now,

you got to remember, I'm going to kind

of like from from what I can recall from

memory on this, there is a very complex

partnership here between Microsoft and

um OpenAI in terms of their IP, so their

intellectual property when it comes to

the models that they're designing. and

Microsoft can almost like this is a very

basic way of viewing it but can copy and

paste their models in a way and sort of

take them because of the deal they've

got and they're saying this remains

unchanged so we're still going to have

control of that and it's not like Amazon

is now going to be able to just copy and

paste the models from open AI at least

that's what they're trying to say

because remember Amazon and Microsoft

major competitors uh through through

loads of their products like cloud

obviously and through compute and all of

that stuff Microsoft maintains its

exclusive license to access the

intellectual property across open air

models and products. Collaborations like

the partnership between Open and Amazon

were always contemplating under our new

agreement and Microsoft is excited to

see what they build together. They're

not excited. They're like, "Fuck off. We

want it all for ourselves." But these

are the things that are happening. And

also, what do they want? I mean, there

there's literally nothing there at the

moment. [laughter] Anyway, uh our

commercial and revenue sharing

relationship remains unchanged. The

ongoing revenue share arrangement

remains unchanged and has always

included sharing revenue from

partnership between OpenAI and other

cloud providers. Azour remains the

exclusive cloud provider of stateless

open AI APIs. Microsoft is the didn't

didn't they say in their uh initial

press release that I just read off that

they're they're looking forward to AWS

stateless um compute or something.

Anyway, maybe I'm losing my mind. All of

that provides access to Open AI's models

and IP. These APIs can be purchased from

Microsoft or directly from OpenAI.

Customers and developers benefit from

Azour's global infrastructure security

and enterprisegrade capabilities of

scale. Any stateless API calls to OpenAI

models that result from a collaboration

between OpenAI and any third party

including Amazon will be hosted on

Azure. So they're trying to say the

connection is always going to be there

to the Microsoft cloud. So Microsoft

will still be making money. OpenAI's

first party products including Frontier

will continue to be hosted on Azour. Now

that's a thing which they're launching

to try and take on uh anthropic and the

whole enterprise AI world. AGI

definition and processes are unchanged.

The contractual definition of AGI and

the process for determinate as that has

been achieved remains the same. The

partnership supports OpenAI's growth as

OpenAI scales and continues to have

flexibility to commit to additional

compute elsewhere including through

largecale infrastructure initiatives

such as the Stargate project. Uh and the

partnership was designed to give

Microsoft an open AI room to pursue new

opportunities independently while

continuing to collaborate which each

company is doing together independently.

We remain committed to our partnership

and a shared mission that brought us

together. We continue to work side by

side to deliver powerful AI tools,

advanced responsible development and

ensure that AI benefits people and

organizations everywhere. So yeah, I

mean they that statement is just a

straight up look we need to actually

it's damage limitation, right? Clearly,

OpenAI is getting into bed with

everybody it can. It needs the money.

Microsoft, we're not willing to give

them the money or a large percentage of

the money, a large chunk of the money.

You've got to ask yourself, why is that?

Is it because Microsoft think that

they're not great? Is it because

Microsoft have got their, you know, they

can they're happy with the relationship

they've got at the moment. There's a lot

of things going on here, but I do think

the the sort of kicker here is

Microsoft's AI to me seems like the

worst of the bunch. It's not good. So,

this is the official release from

OpenAI. So this is a scaling AI for

everyone. And what I want to do is just

bring us down to the bottom here because

this again highlights what their

partnership is between Amazon and Nvidia

and and Open AI. So for Amazon, they say

uh OpenAI and Amazon today announced a

multi-year strategic partnership to

accelerate AI innovation for enterprise

startups and end consumers around the

world. You can read the full press

release there. And with Nvidia, we're

also expanding our long uh collaboration

with Nvidia, including the use of 3 GW

of dedicated inference capacity and 2 GW

of training on Vera Rubin. This builds

on Hopper and Blackwell systems already

in operation across Microsoft um OCI and

Coreweave. Together, this capital

infrastructure expansion strengthens our

ability to train and deploy frontier

models at a global scale. And then we

got some quotes from everyone involved.

to open AI say we're pushing the

frontiers across infrastructure research

and products to make AI more capable,

reliable, and broadly useful. SoftBank,

Nvidia, and Amazon are long-term

partners who share our ambition. I mean,

obviously, no [ __ ] SoftBank is heavily

invested into this. Nvidia is selling

you like the the picks in the gold mine,

in the gold rush, and and gold, I should

say, gold rush. This ain't football. And

and Amazon. Yeah. They're long-term

partners who share our ambition to turn

real signific scientific progress into

systems that deliver meaningful benefits

for people at a global scale. Building

which isn't generative AI slop which I'm

seeing everywhere and it's killing me

that works for everyone will require

deep collaboration across the stack and

we're excited to do this together. So

that's from Sam Amazon. So Andy Jasse,

the president and CEO of Amazon says, "A

strategic partnership with Open AI

creates significant value for the

shareholders for both companies and our

investment reflects conviction in the

trajectory. With some of the most in

inventive and widely adopted products

and great IP and a very talented team,

OpenAI is well positioned for a

long-term success. We're excited about

the opportunity to build with them and

invest in the company and partnership

over a long period of time." and video

say so from big bad Jensen artificial

intelligence is the most consequential

technology of our time and open AI is at

the forefront we've been privileged to

partner with open AI since its earliest

days at as it is delivered one

breakthrough after another together we

will continue to push the frontier

building the infrastructure for the age

of AI and scaling its benefits to serve

industries and societies worldwide I

mean Jensen if open AI open AI goes down

Jensen goes down you know what I'm

saying so like they're they are

intertwined AI is transforming the world

and an unprecedented pay. Softbank open

AI uh is a clear leader with world-class

technology and an unparalleled global

user base and we have strong conviction

in its continued growth through this

additional investment. We will

accelerate OpenAI's research and

ecosystem expansion while advancing our

own ASI strategy. You know how Nvidia is

very proud in saying, "Yeah, we use

loads of AI coding bots now at Nvidia.

Everyone's got one. We all use it. We

generate code with it. Look what video

cards are reporting. Uh Nvidia say

February the 26, 11 a.m. PT update. We

have discovered a bug in the Game Ready

and Studio 5959

WHQL drivers and I've removed the

downloads temporarily while our team

investigates. For users that have

already installed this driver or

experiencing issues with fan control,

please roll back. Now, I will say an

issue with fan control in your graphics

driver is probably a bad thing,

especially if it's a big beefy Nvidia

GPU that's consuming untold amounts of

power and getting ridiculously hot. It's

going to die if the fans [laughter]

don't work. I'm going to just say, I

mean, this has not been confir been

confirmed, but I'm just going to say

this is due to their AI sloth coding.

It's got to be. So, we're going to see

more of this. Mark my words. Now I don't

know whether you've been following this

but um the war department in America so

the department of defense which was

renamed to the war department um

basically the American military they

want unrestricted access to anthropics

AI models for things like autonomous

drone swarms um I think like all fancy

stuff like kill chain automatic kill

chain whatever basically just an AI

system that can just identify targets

and attack them doesn't need any kind of

oversight from a human um anthrop IC

were given a deadline of today and

Anthropic said no we don't want anything

to do with this but still the war

department are saying oh no we're still

talking to anthropic and now open AI has

got involved in this this is um one of

those things where it becomes this sort

of wider philosophical issue of AI and

its impact on society and where are the

guard rails who is going to implement

the guardrails that is the big thing

here we just don't know

obviously ly these AI labs all want to

just continue this like relentless march

of progress almost at the cost of

everything else and we're seeing it's at

the cost of the environment the cost of

water the cost of electricity anyway

anthropics say this a statement on our

discussions with the department of war I

do want to start with this um quote from

the statement they say regardless these

threats do not change our position we

cannot in good conscience aced to their

request so they're saying they cannot

agree with this. So we'll go through

this now and read it because it is fair

to read this. I can't just take quotes

out of this. This is um you know this is

a statement we need to go through. So a

statement from Dario on our discussions

with the department of war. I believe

deeply in the existential importance of

using AI to defend the United States and

other democracies and to defeat

autocratic adversaries.

Anthropic has therefore worked

proactively to deploy our models to the

Department of War and the intelligence

community. We were the first frontier AI

company to deploy our models in the US

government's classified networks. The

first to deploy them at the national

laboratories and the first to provide

custom models for national security

customers. Claude is extensively

deployed across the Department of War

and other national security agencies for

mission critical applications such as

intelligence analysis, modeling and

simulation, operational planning, cyber

operations, and more. Anthropic has also

acted to defend America's lead in AI

even when it's against the company's

short-term interest. We chose to forgo

several hundred million dollars in

revenue to cut off the use of claude by

firms linked to the Chinese Communist

Party. Some of whom who have been

designated by the Department of War as

Chinese military companies shut down CCP

sponsored cyber attacks that attempted

to abuse Claude and have advocated for

strong export controls on chips to

ensure a democratic advantage. Enthropic

understands that the Department of War,

not private companies, makes military

decisions. We have never raised

objections to particular military

operations nor attempted to limit the

use of our technology in an ad hoc

manner. However, in a narrow set of

cases, we believe AI can undermine

rather than defend democratic values.

Some uses are also simply outside the

bounds of what today's technology can

safely, reliably do. Two such use cases

have never been included in our

contracts of the Department of War, and

we believe they should not be included

now. So mass domestic surveillance.

We support the use of AI for lawful

foreign intelligence and counter

intelligence missions. But using these

systems for mass domestic surveillance

is incompatible with democratic values.

AIdriven mass surveillance prevents

serious novel risks to our fundamental

liberties. To the extent that such

surveillance is currently legal, this is

only because the law has not yet caught

up with the rapidly growing capabilities

of AI. For example, under current law,

the government can purchase detailed

records of Americans movements, web

browsing, and associations from public

sources without obtaining a warrant. A

practice the intelligence community has

acknowledged raises privacy concerns and

that has generated bipartisan opposition

in Congress. Powerful AI makes it

possible to assemble this scattered,

individually innocuous data into a

comprehensive picture of any person's

life automatically and at a massive

scale. And the next one is fully

autonomous weapons. Partially autonomous

weapons like those used today in Ukraine

are vital to the defense of democracy.

Even fully autonomous weapons like uh

those that take humans out of the loop

entirely and automate selecting and

engaging targets may prove critical for

our national defense. But today,

frontier AI systems are simply not

reliable enough to power fully

autonomous weapons. We will not

knowingly provide a product that puts

America's war fighters and civilians at

risk. We have offered to work directly

with the Department of War and research

and development to improve the

reliability of these systems, but they

have not accepted this offer. In

addition, without proper oversight,

fully autonomous weapons cannot be

relied upon to exercise the critical

judgment that our highly trained

professional troops exhibit every day.

They need to be deployed with proper

guard rails, which don't exist today.

So, we do need to discuss both of these

points. I mean, the first point, mass

surveillance. I mean, if you're

American, I'm pretty sure that goes

against your constitutional rights as

well. For me, in the UK, obviously, I

don't want mass surveillance. It's

terrible. We always look to countries

like China and we say, "Yeah, China

under mass AI surveillance." Even in the

UK, there's facial recognition cameras

that I've seen them. They deploy them.

They're like AI mobile things. They have

them on roads. Um, and they say that

they use to um see if people are using

mobile phones, but I bet you they can

detect who the person is and all kinds

of stuff. And that is a very worrying

path to go down where everything becomes

well you know like you've just got mass

surveillance like everything is being

recorded by the government that's never

a state you want to be in that is just

that is that is bad that is super bad so

I am glad that anthropic are against

that but I'm not too sure they can stop

it and I'm pretty sure it's already

happening anyway uh they just don't want

to use their models used for that but

most likely they probably are being used

for that now the other component here is

fully autonomous weapon happens. And

again, this goes back to that cliche

thing of Terminator, Skynet. The first

thing Skynet does when it realizes uh

what it becomes aware is I'll attack the

USSR or I'll attack Russia because

they'll fire all their nuclear weapons

back at me and kill all of these humans,

which I don't want, and then I can crack

on with whatever I want to do. It seems

to me crazy, in fact, batshit insane to

hand over the the entire like kill chain

to an AI because you don't really know

what it's going to do. They make

mistakes. you use AI now you get basic

mistakes back from the AI you can't make

mistakes if you're going to stop

deploying ordinance what the hell's

going to happen there so again the

systems just not advanced enough for

that but probably at some point they

will be and they will be used for that

so it does to me unfortunately feel like

this is just postponing the inevitable

they go on to say or Dario goes on to

say uh to our knowledge these two

exceptions have not been a barrier to

accelerating the adoption and use of our

models within our armed forces to date

the department of war has stated They

will only contract with AI companies who

aced to any lawful use and remove

safeguards in the case mentioned above.

They have threatened to remove us from

their systems if we maintain these

safeguards. They have also threatened to

designate us a supply chain risk, a

label reserved for US adversaries never

before applied to an American company

and to invoke the Defense Production Act

to force the safeguards removal. These

latter two threats are inherently

contradictory. One labels security risk,

the other labels claude as essential to

national security. Regardless, these

threats do not change our position. We

cannot in good conscience a seed to this

request. It is the department's

prerogative to select contracts most

aligned with their vision. But given the

substantial value that anthropics

technology provides to our armed forces,

we hope they reconsider. Our strong

preference is to continue to serve the

Department of War and our war fighters

with our two requested safeguards in

place. Should the department choose to

offboard Anthropic, we will work to

enable a smooth transition to another

provider, avoiding any disruption to

ongoing military planning, operations,

or other critical missions. Our models

will be available in the expansive terms

we have proposed as for as long as

required. We remain ready to continue

our work to support national security of

the United States. So over on

investing.com, OpenAI's Altman seeks to

deescalate anthropic Pentagon standoff,

which was reported initially by the Wall

Street Journal. So, OpenAI chief

executive uh Sam Alman told staff

Thursday that the company was working on

a potential deal that could help resolve

the standoff between Anthropic and the

Pentagon over battlefield AI use. No

deal has been signed and the talks could

fall through. According to reporting

from the Wall Street Journal, citing a

person familiar with the matter. In a

note to staff on Thursday viewed by the

Wall Street Journal, Alman wrote that

OpenAI was exploring an agreement with

the Department of War that would allow

its models to be deployed in classified

environments while aligning with company

principles. The proposed contract would

cover any use except those which are

unlawful or unsuited for cloud

deployments such as domestic

surveillance and autonomous offensive

weapons. But again, you've got to

remember with this stuff, you this

stuff, it's like you can just flip a

switch and immediately they can do those

things. Maybe not to the, you know, a

super accurate ability, especially not

for autonomous weapons right now, but it

is coming and it's getting very close.

So, I almost feel like all of this

stuff, it kind of doesn't matter because

eventually they will just have AI that

will do this. And where that takes us as

a as a species, I don't even I don't

even know. We We need We really do need

guardrails in place for this stuff cuz

things are going to get crazy.

Open AAI seeks to maint well wellman

said he hoped to help broker a

resolution between two sides. Open AAI

seeks to maintain these guardrails

through technical rather than

contractual means such as exploring a

contract that would only allow its

technology uh to be used from the cloud

not in edge cases. This would prohibit

its use in autonomous weapons without

humans in the loop. Man wrote that

OpenAI would also build technical

safeguards and deploy personnel to

partner with the government to ensure

proper operation. The company would

offer similar services to other allied

nations. If successful, this approach

could provide a path that works for

other AI labs. Earlier Thursday,

Anthropic CEO Dario Emodi announced that

the company had rejected the Department

of Wars demands and that made its

technology available for all lawful

uses. Anthropic insisting on being able

to bar it use for mass domestic

surveillance and autonomous weapons. And

uh I've just read this. So, like I said,

we all get caught out by this article

was generated with the support of uh AI

and reviewed by an editor. So, yeah, we

all get caught out by AI. I was saying

this in another video. I literally

looked at this article and thought, "Oh,

yeah, this is this is supporting. I'll

use it." Should have just went to the

Wall Street Journal, but then again,

these things happen and we're just going

to roll with it. So, AI, we need to

talk, I think, about the implications

this is going to have to us. And I think

as well, this is, you know, we talk

about this, you know, we talk about

nuclear weapons, right? I think in a lot

of ways AI is it is the new the next

generation nuclear weapon. What it's

going to enable is, you know, you've got

those sci-fi visions of thousands and

thousands of drones, drone swarm

technology, hundreds of thousands of

drones flying over to attack, I don't

know, a lot of the things, you know,

China against the West or China against

the US, some absolutely massive like

automated AI war. Whoever's got the best

AI model is going to win. can ever make

the most of the actual, you know, the

the drones is going to win that kind of

war. And I think if one side is playing

by rules and another side isn't, it

forces the other side not to play by

rules. And this is a path we've gone

down before with nuclear weapons where

everyone starts building up to a point

that is absolutely ludicrous. And then

what happened? We had nuclear

non-prololiferation proliferation I

should say comes in and then we get a

reduction of nuclear weapons and we're

at a level where there's still enough

nuclear weapons to end humanity more

than enough times over but it is didn't

get totally out of control and it made

it a little bit safer. AI this is

happening so fast with AI. I don't know

where this is going to go. Like AI is

deployed in Ukraine. We know in the

Ukrainian war AI is being used all over

the place. There isn't fully autonomous

systems. I don't think that being used,

but there are systems that use AI for

target identification, for intelligence,

for stuff like that, but there isn't

much of a jump when you start seeing

full-blown autonomous systems. And then

where do we go from that? And this is

one of those things where I say this a

lot when I'm talking about AI, but it is

like it is an existential crisis because

where where are we where does this end?

You know what I mean? We we're going

from a stupid world of chat bots and

slot generated AI to just machines of

killing and

mass surveillance and ah AI. It's crazy.

It is crazy. All right guys, let me know

what you think about this in the

comments below. I think this it's been

bit of a a pretty heavy video I think

this has. But we'll uh I'll look forward

to reading the comments and yeah. All

right, guys. I'm in Styosi. You can

follow me everything which styos and

I'll catch you lovely lot on the next

one. See you soon.