I was NOT expecting THIS.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
hey this note from the federal reserve
that you're about to see could be
bullish for us i'm really excited for it
especially leading into tomorrow where
if you haven't yet watched my video
watch the video that's titled watch
before may 11th all about cpi tomorrow
but i really want to focus on what the
fed just said neil kashkari president of
the minneapolis fed let's get right into
what he said and then i'm going to give
you a conclusion at the end which let me
just say i was not expecting this all
right let's get into it quick note
remember six days until we have the
largest price create increase ever for
the programs on building your wealth
link down below specifically you want to
take a look at that real estate
investing one right now you get 12 years
of not only my experience but you also
get 35 years of my my in-laws lauren's
parents experience because the connie
for example makes appearances multiple
appearances in our do-it-yourself
property management course and rental
renovations group you get all of the
property management rental property
experience from myself lauren connie
bill you name it our entire family
really incredible content and a lot of
folks have been checking out on both the
zero to millionaire real estate
investing group and that do-it-yourself
property management group as a bundle so
check that out before the prices go up
and you get a better deal if you bundle
them together link down below all right
folks let's get into it phasing rates
and in whether it's through a series of
50 basis points or maybe 75 does at some
point come back on the table if you're
trying to increase supply through
investment
you're cutting off your nose despite the
fit your face you you want to you know
you want capital deployed to ease all
the supply constraints and it's going to
be more expensive to do that every time
you raise race it's it's almost a
catch-22 and a very difficult
and blunt tool that the fed has to just
try to destroy demand it's a real
problem i don't know you sure you want
to keep doing this a really good
question there by the way because the
question is like dude like lower rates
would help us invest in the factories
and in the supply chains to make them
better
obviously my expectation here is the
federal reserve's argument is like hey
you got high enough valuations to
finance and we just want to get back to
neutral we don't need to stimulate more
to finance your expansion so while i
like the setup it kind of misses the
fact that companies got plenty of money
but let's listen to the response from
neil kashkari he is the president of the
minneapolis fed
well we have our job to do you know we
have to bring inflation back down and
i'm confident we will do that but
remember the cost of capital for most
and for most large firms is still very
very low right they can still go fund
themselves at very attractive rates so i
think we're a long way away from the
cost of capital being the barrier for
example to firms investing in the energy
sector i do think it's more lack of
confidence on where energy prices are
going to be over the medium term to see
what kind of return they get on their
investment and also the regulatory
environment that you spoke about hey
neil um
the fed has a dual mandate and that's to
focus on inflation but also focus on
unemployment the jobs market um in the
past we've talked about how the fed
probably has even more mandates than
that worrying about a series of other
things from the economy overall to to
what might happen with the stock market
is it fair to assume because at this
point you sound like you are pretty
laser focused on the inflation piece of
it understandably so inflation is
destroying things right now is it fair
to assume that you're not paying that
much attention as a as a body to what
happens to the stock market at this
point it's it's going to be focused on
inflation and what happens to the market
happens he's nodding
absolutely i mean we i mean i'll be
honest with you i never focus on the
stock market as a goal uh we pay
attention to asset prices as it comes
back around into psychology and spending
behavior but ultimately it is our dual
mandate that drives us you know for five
years up until the pandemic i was
probably the most dovish member of the
federal open market committee and i was
i took that view because we were
undershooting on inflation and i still
saw there was slack in the labor market
so if you're under shooting on both
sides of your mandate that means the
monetary policy is too tight
now we have a very strong labor market
and we want to keep it strong but
inflation is much much too high and we
have to bring inflation back down and
ideally if we have monetary policy
dialed in right those two things will be
in tension we'll be at two percent
inflation and we'll be at a very healthy
labor market and we'll have confidence
that we've got it right but right now
it's just imbalanced and we need to
bring it back into balance
you just said you don't focus so much on
the stock market unto itself but you do
focus on the psychological impact of of
the price of assets well effectively
what i imagine you're saying is the
wealth effect or the lack of wealth
effect
given where you've seen assets move over
the last month
how do you think that that psychology
has changed has do you think that and
also given some of the other numbers you
were just talking about in terms of how
much household wealth families have how
much more does that have to come down to
change the psychology
well it's a good question you know when
i think about this this um
regime that we might be in a higher
pressure equilibrium the wealth effect
is part of that so stock prices were
very high relative to pre-pandemic home
prices very high relative to
pre-pandemic and then even the lower
income households that don't own stocks
or don't own a home many of them have
much stronger
healthy balance sheets than they had
before the pandemic my theory is that
all of that is leading people to feel
more confident and to spend more and
maybe that's what's pushing us into this
higher consumption higher spending
higher inflation regime so yes the stock
market has come down home prices are
still very high the the latest data is
that still been quite robust even though
mortgage rates have climbed quite a bit
just over the course of this year and
again household balance sheets continue
to be very strong and so you know we
just need to keep paying attention to
the data some of the
most recent inflation data on some
measures is a little softer than we had
thought might come in so maybe there's
some evidence that things are starting
to soften just a hair but we just need
to keep paying attention to the data and
seeing where it comes out before we can
draw any conclusions did you catch what
he just said and in my opinion it's
bullish
inflation is actually already coming in
lower
than what the federal reserve was
expecting it to remember the federal
reserve missed the boat in terms of the
fact that inflation ran way too hot way
too fast
but their expectations were that it
would slowly cool eventually and now
they're actually already saying that
internally amongst each other they're
seeing more of a decline we already know
that the stock market needs to go down
for the federal reserve to feel that
individual's wealth is going down so
they spend less money to drive inflation
down now that's not the goal right we
know the goal isn't to bring stocks down
it's just that when you bring the stock
market down and you bring the real
estate market down people spend less
money and then inflation goes away right
and now obviously he gave us a big hint
here that hey you know stocks have kind
of already gone down but real estate
even though rates have gone up still
hasn't gone down in other words hey we
might still have to kind of tighten the
screws on real estate a little bit so
they're watching and waiting for real
estate prices to come down imagine being
this group of people like let's go crash
stocks okay let's now go crash real
estate like it's kind of wild and
powerful right but think about this way
loretta mester this morning said the
following quote volatility is painful
but necessary to get inflation down i
wrote this on twitter that's why you
should follow me on twitter at really
kevin i wrote translated yo we need
stocks to drop so people feel poorer and
then inflation will come down as people
spend less don't worry though we sold
our stocks beforehand to avoid a
conflict of interest
sure by the way they stopped owning
individual stocks uh and sort of being
able to make these portfolio decisions
kind of at the peak of the market in
like november and then they went into
this crazy tightening cycle so it's like
oh
gosh just copy the fed when the fed
sells you sell
but they can't do that anymore
supposedly anywho uh this this lower
inflation expectation
really big deal
imagine if tomorrow and maybe they
already know this right maybe they have
their own estimates or they get a leaked
early copy or whatever imagine if they
already know the cpi is going to come in
low tomorrow in my opinion
bullish very very bullish if we get cpi
that confirms the thesis that inflation
may be peaked in march and actually
comes in even lower than expected it can
be very very very good especially for
risk assets which are all
kind of still selling off anyway good
luck out there thanks for watching check
out the programs on your wealth link
down below
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.