TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Stop Rambling: The 3-2-1 Speaking Trick That Makes You Sound Like A CEO

25m 54s5,145 words740 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

If you want better conversations,

0:01

conversations where people actually

0:03

listen to you, where you stop rambling,

0:05

where you sound sharp, fast, decisive,

0:08

then today's [music] episode is for you.

0:09

Because I've realized something.

0:10

Communication isn't a soft skill. It's a

0:12

science. And scientists [music] can now

0:14

tell you what makes someone magnetic and

0:17

what makes [music] someone instantly

0:19

forgettable. So, I'm going to give you a

0:20

bunch of researchbacked,

0:22

neurosciencebacked communication tools

0:24

that I've realized almost all of the top

0:26

1% use, but nobody else talks about.

0:29

This is how you change the way you speak

0:31

in minutes, not years.

0:35

Mindset shift number one. People mirror

0:38

your micro behaviors in about 200

0:40

milliseconds. Think like less than the

0:42

blink of an eye. This is something

0:43

called the neuroecho effect. And it's

0:45

pretty wild. So neuroscientists at the

0:48

University of Parma discovered that your

0:49

brain has mirror neurons that fire

0:51

within 200 milliseconds of watching

0:53

someone else move or emote, which

0:55

basically means people don't respond to

0:57

what you say. They respond to the

0:58

emotional signal you send before the

1:00

words even happen. So if you speak

1:02

intention, their nervous system tenses.

1:05

If you speak more certainty, their

1:07

nervous system calms. If you are

1:09

scattered, they kind of mirror that

1:11

scattered. If you speak grounded, they

1:13

become more grounded. And this is the

1:15

real reason that top speakers or the

1:17

people that you look up to or the CEOs

1:19

you look up to in the world, they look

1:21

pretty calm when they speak because

1:23

they're actually trying to regulate the

1:24

room's nervous system without anyone

1:26

noticing. You know, I remember when I

1:27

walked into a room of a bunch of private

1:29

equity guys. You can imagine a mahogany

1:31

table, a bunch of guys in suits sitting

1:33

around it. I'm the youngest person by

1:35

far. I'm the only female. I know it's a

1:37

stereotype, but it's what happened at

1:39

that point. We were coming in to talk

1:40

about my company and there was no chair

1:42

for me. Nobody stood up. Nobody asked to

1:44

pull up a chair. And uh they were sort

1:46

of all arguing on top of each other,

1:48

talking about things, ignoring me. And

1:50

there's many ways I could have

1:51

approached this conversation, but I

1:53

walked in. Then I pulled up a chair and

1:55

I just sat down quietly and I waited. I

1:58

didn't try to speak over them. I didn't

2:00

try to push through them. I just sat

2:02

there like I had all the time in the

2:04

world for them to figure out their small

2:05

things. Because here's why. I made a

2:08

promise to myself that I do not make

2:10

myself small for small men. And I don't

2:14

think you should do so either. You know,

2:16

I've walked into PE meetings where

2:18

everyone is talking over each other like

2:19

caffeinated squirrels. I don't play that

2:22

game. I sit quiet and within like 30 to

2:26

90 seconds, the entire energy shifts

2:29

back towards you because people mirror

2:31

these micro behaviors faster than they

2:33

actually process your words. They would

2:35

never listen to me if I started piping

2:37

in, if I stop started shouting, if I

2:39

tried to get their attention and said,

2:41

"Quietly, let the room come to you."

2:43

Then there's this other thing that's

2:44

fascinating about the brain and the way

2:46

you communicate and that is that the

2:47

brain is addicted to novelty, not logic.

2:50

So they call this the orienting

2:51

response. So if you want to instantly

2:53

grab somebody's attention, you need to

2:55

give them something unexpected, right?

2:57

So there's a Russian neuroscientist that

2:59

discovered this reflex. But anytime a

3:02

brain encounters novelty, it diverts a

3:05

lot of processing power to it. And so

3:07

your brain is actually wired to

3:09

prioritize surprise, curiosity, pattern

3:12

breaks over logical information. That's

3:13

how we get you on TikTok with these

3:15

crazy clickbait little videos that

3:17

happen, right? So the way you start a

3:19

conversation matters more than the

3:20

conversation itself, which is crazy. If

3:23

you lead with something that disrupts

3:24

the brain, that is surprising fact, a

3:26

bold statement, a strange question. The

3:29

brain literally has to pay attention and

3:31

then it has to stick there for a second

3:33

because it's actually manually

3:34

processing it. sort of like a a car

3:36

starting up a motor slowly. So, I want

3:39

you to ask yourself, how many times do

3:40

you worry about all the things that

3:41

you're going to say to somebody, but not

3:43

just what the first sentence is. Three,

3:45

I think people judge your intelligence

3:47

by clarity, not complexity. This took me

3:49

a long time to realize. It's called the

3:50

simplicity anchor. So, a study from the

3:53

University of Munich found something

3:55

really fascinating. When speakers use

3:56

simple language, listeners rate them as

3:59

smarter, more competent, more

4:01

trustworthy. But when speakers use

4:03

complicated or overly technical

4:05

language, listeners assume they're

4:07

hiding something insecure. Not as smart

4:10

as they look. And I've seen this

4:11

firsthand. When you go into an

4:13

investment meeting, one of the first

4:15

things you want to do is you want the

4:16

other person to think that you're smart.

4:17

You're asking for money from them. But

4:20

immediately listen to it next time you

4:22

get your spidey senses up on somebody

4:24

because they start using words like

4:26

cogent and I find this to be divisive

4:30

instead of like that makes sense and I'm

4:32

not sure everybody would agree with

4:33

that. So if you want people to think

4:35

you're smart the crazy part you got to

4:38

stop trying to sound smart. Simplicity

4:40

actually shows a new IQ signal. It shows

4:43

a higher IQ signal. The other part about

4:45

this that's true is that questions

4:47

actually increase dopamine. So they call

4:49

this the curiosity loop. Carnegie Melon

4:51

scientists discovered that when you ask

4:53

someone a question, especially an

4:55

open-ended one, their brain releases

4:57

dopamine, right? That's like the

4:58

happiness drug. Dopamine makes people

5:01

more alert, more engaged, and more

5:02

curious. This is why questions pull

5:05

people into conversations, not away from

5:07

them. How many times have you been in a

5:09

conversation with somebody and they're

5:10

just talking about themselves and you

5:11

want to die until like you can get a

5:13

word in or potentially, I don't know,

5:14

respond to something? That's why one of

5:16

the most famous books of all time which

5:19

is uh how to win friends and influence

5:20

people by Dale Carnegie. The entire book

5:23

you can skip it. The book goes like

5:25

this. Shut up, listen more. People care

5:27

more about what you know about them than

5:30

what they know about you. So try opening

5:33

next time with something like, hey, can

5:35

I ask you something I've never asked

5:37

before? Do you want to hear something

5:38

strange? Can I test an idea on you? It's

5:41

like, ooh, me? I'm so special. This is

5:45

just for you and I. It's something

5:47

unique. You know, I once closed a deal

5:49

because I asked the seller what would

5:51

make this sale feel like a relief

5:52

instead of a risk. I could just tell he

5:55

was like super tight. He didn't want to

5:56

sell his business. I actually there's so

5:58

many physical reactions people have. He

6:00

had these little hives. It actually uh

6:02

happens a lot on men. I've noticed when

6:04

they're nervous, they'll break out in

6:05

kind of red splotches on their neck. And

6:07

I could just tell he was in a heightened

6:09

state. He didn't really want to talk

6:10

about his business financials. He was

6:12

kind of scared that they were too messed

6:13

up in order for me to want to buy this

6:15

business. And so he was getting

6:16

heightened and heightened and

6:17

heightened. And even though I was trying

6:19

to downregulate, I couldn't break him

6:21

out of it. But I said instead, I just

6:23

kind of leaned in quietly and was like,

6:25

"Hey, what would make this sale feel

6:27

like a relief instead of a risk?" And

6:30

I'm quietly giving it to him. I'm

6:32

leaning in, showing intent. I'm very

6:35

focused on him. and his entire body

6:38

changed because questions chemically

6:40

shift conversations,

6:42

especially if you pair it with the last

6:45

video that we did. It's about

6:46

communication and how to speak like a

6:47

CEO because your voice literally changes

6:51

other people's heart rates. This is

6:53

called vocal entrainment. And this one

6:56

also blew my mind. University College

6:58

London found that humans subconsciously

7:01

sync their heartbeats to the rhythm of a

7:04

speaker's voice. vocal entrainment. So

7:07

if you speak rushed, restless, stressed,

7:10

heart rate is going to increase. They're

7:12

going to feel stressed. If you speak

7:14

steady, decisive, rhythmic, their heart

7:17

rate calms. They feel safer. So your

7:20

voice is not just communication. It's

7:21

like a remote control for other people's

7:24

physiology, other people's biology and

7:27

makeup and how they feel in an instance.

7:29

This is probably why I don't know if you

7:31

guys have ever been to a yoga class

7:33

where the yoga class is like a super

7:34

fast high-pitched voice. Awful. Could be

7:37

the best speaker in the world. But they

7:39

have to speak. If you ever noticed, they

7:40

speak in kind of this yoga tongue like

7:43

and downward dog and then we're going to

7:45

move into upward dog and then we're

7:48

going to Why is that? They're trying to

7:49

rhythmically control your breathing. And

7:52

this rhythmic language sounds more true

7:55

to people. The processing fluency effect

7:57

is actually where a Princeton study

7:59

found that statements that rhyme or

8:01

follow rhythm are judged as more

8:03

truthful. And what does this mean? It

8:05

means if the brain can process a phrase

8:07

quickly, it assumes it must be correct.

8:09

See how these lines feel on you right

8:11

now. Move slow to move fast. What you

8:14

track grows back. You repeat what you

8:17

don't repair. It's kind of like, doesn't

8:18

that sound like deep wisdom? It's like

8:21

you repeat what you don't repair. You're

8:23

like, "Yeah, that is true. I've noticed

8:25

that, right? Like even before the

8:27

meaning is processed, it sounds like

8:29

wisdom. And this rhythmic language in

8:31

your language can be incredibly

8:34

persuasive. And so, how would you use

8:36

this in everyday life? Well, sometimes

8:38

we call it talking in tweets. So, for

8:41

the founders that we teach at Contrarian

8:43

Thinking, half the time I'll say, "When

8:45

was the last time you actually said

8:46

those words out loud that you're

8:48

speaking right now?" Like, have you ever

8:49

read somebody's email? it's a founder

8:51

when they're trying to sound smart and

8:52

they're like to whom it may concern you

8:54

know please find attached the subject

8:56

matter of this email which is uh in

8:59

regards to our conversation we had last

9:01

week I'd like to follow up on shut up

9:03

what that's not English instead think

9:06

about how you could say more or what is

9:08

called high signal with less words so

9:11

high signal to noise ratio and that

9:13

might be something like quick followup

9:17

on the one important thing we talked

9:18

about last week like how can you just be

9:21

as concise as possible? And some of the

9:24

most impactful people of our generation,

9:26

there's a guy by the name of Naval

9:28

Ravocant and he's basically known for

9:30

having banger oneliners. Banger

9:32

oneliners. If you can speak in

9:34

oneliners, people will repeat your words

9:36

back to you. The simpler it is, the more

9:38

rhythmic it is, the more people will

9:40

repeat your words back. If you can get

9:42

people to repeat your words back to you,

9:43

what happens? They follow you. They

9:45

listen to you. They think that you are

9:46

truthful because you literally put words

9:48

in their mouth. If you want to get hyper

9:50

tactical on this, there's something

9:52

called the 321 trick. And I can't

9:54

remember where I stole this from

9:55

originally, but it's so good. And so I

9:57

want to share it with you. The step one

10:00

is pause 3 seconds. So when you are in a

10:04

situation where you want to communicate

10:06

aggressively, you want to be listened

10:08

to, you are in one of those difficult

10:10

conversations, I want you to pause for

10:11

three seconds. This is actually going to

10:14

activate part of your brain.

10:16

Neuroscientists found that when you

10:17

pause even briefly, your anterior

10:20

singulate cortex activates, a fancy way

10:23

of saying the part of your brain

10:24

responsible for error detection and

10:27

attention or lies. It comes to attention

10:30

and the pause literally kind of clears

10:32

your mental windshield, allows you to

10:34

see what is true or not. So somebody

10:36

says something you don't like, you're

10:37

going to pause. One, two, three. Then

10:40

you're going to do step two. Give only

10:42

two points. This is called dual track

10:44

working memory. the the brain really

10:46

can't process too many things at once.

10:48

So, it can usually process a verbal and

10:50

a visual track. So, when you limit to

10:52

two points, both tracks sync. And then,

10:56

can you please repeat that point back to

10:58

me? So, what am I doing? I'm putting my

11:00

hand out there like pointing to a

11:01

specific point. My uh movement is

11:04

mimicking my communication and I'm

11:06

giving them one thing to act on. Step

11:08

three, end with one question. This is

11:10

how you interrupt what's called the

11:11

default mode network. So your brain has

11:13

a default mode like the way that it runs

11:16

every single day. It's it's why when you

11:18

drive to the office, for instance, you

11:20

ever like get to the office, you're

11:21

like, "Oh, I for like I didn't even

11:22

remember driving here." Right? That's

11:24

daydreaming, wondering your default mode

11:26

network. And questions shut that down

11:28

instantly. It like immediately forces

11:30

the brain to come into the present

11:31

moment whether it wants to or not. And

11:33

this is how you pull anyone back into

11:35

the conversation, even if they were

11:36

drifting. So let's say you really want

11:38

somebody to pay attention to you. You're

11:40

going to go, "Okay, here's the 321

11:41

method. You're going to pause after they

11:43

speak. 3 2 1. That is going to make them

11:47

pay attention. They're like, "Oh, that's

11:48

uncomfortable. What's happening here?"

11:50

Two-step. I want to talk about this one

11:52

point. Visual plus plus verbal cue. Last

11:56

point. Do you understand what the goal

11:58

is for this or can we talk about that

12:00

one point together? Pulls them back into

12:02

the conversation. Super easy trick for

12:04

difficult important conversations. There

12:06

are some tactical tools I think that we

12:08

all should just have in our toolbox when

12:10

it comes to communicating. And I wish

12:11

they had taught this in school instead

12:12

of like whatever we learned in marketing

12:15

or communication or writing. You know,

12:18

one of the things that's most important

12:20

in speaking in this day and age where we

12:21

have the shorter attention span than

12:23

ever is speaking in sprints, not streams

12:25

or what's called segmented speech

12:27

processing. So MIT researchers found the

12:30

brain processes information in chunks.

12:32

Maybe you've heard this before, not like

12:34

continuous. So after about 12 seconds of

12:37

uninterrupted speech, listener attention

12:39

goes falls to the ground. Tik Tok

12:42

actually based its entire algorithm on

12:44

this single idea that humans can only

12:46

pay attention for 5 to 10 seconds. So

12:50

why do you think the for you page is all

12:53

built on these 5 to 10 second video

12:55

hooks immediately? Because they read the

12:57

MIT research about chunking. So what

13:00

does that mean for us individually?

13:01

Speak in 5 to 10 second sprints. This is

13:04

so uncomfortable. Nobody does it and yet

13:06

it works every single time. I want you

13:08

to pause briefly,

13:13

then continue after 5 to 10 seconds, and

13:15

you're going to watch clarity skyrocket.

13:17

Especially try doing this in a fight.

13:19

It's a fascinating thing to do if you

13:21

are fighting with your husband or wife

13:22

or friend or partner or whoever. Do you

13:24

ever feel like you can't get a word in?

13:26

Like they're like going on and on and on

13:27

and all you're doing is waiting until

13:29

they're done talking so that you can get

13:31

in there and do the same thing. I'm

13:32

going to come right back and then you go

13:33

on for as long as possible as possible.

13:35

that it's like this Mexican standoff

13:37

between the two of you just like

13:38

monologuing each other until you shoot

13:40

yourselves in the face. Not speaking

13:41

from experience. And anyway, the way to

13:44

get around that is to not do what every

13:48

human wants to do, which is speak for a

13:49

long time. It's to go, I really just

13:51

wish you wouldn't raise your voice when

13:53

we spoke less than 10 seconds. Shut up.

13:56

Let them go on for 16 years. I really

13:59

wish that during our next conversation,

14:01

we could sit down and maybe have a glass

14:04

of wine while we're talking about this.

14:07

Shut up. Let them go on. At a certain

14:09

point, the shortness of your responses

14:12

allows the other person to actually hear

14:14

you, and it's going to shorten theirs,

14:16

too. Try it. Comment below. Let me know

14:18

if it works for you. As you can see, I

14:20

use a lot of hand gestures. They

14:22

actually say you should gesture before

14:23

you speak. This is called gesture

14:25

priming. So, lots of studies on this,

14:28

but the one I like the best is from UC

14:29

Berkeley that found that gestures

14:31

actually preede speech in the brain.

14:33

What does that mean? Your hands help

14:35

your brain form the thoughts. So, if you

14:38

want to think clearly while you talk,

14:40

move your hands first. Like, no dead

14:42

hands. One of the most uncomfortable

14:45

things that you can do actually in

14:47

having a difficult conversation is to go

14:49

from this, so hands in front of me

14:51

talking to people to this, hands behind

14:54

of me, not being able to see. Why? What

14:56

does this immediately make you feel when

14:57

my hands are behind me? Like what is she

14:58

holding? What has she got back there?

15:01

This my hands are hidden. Why? The

15:03

reason why actually goes back to the

15:05

caveman days, which is that if our hands

15:07

are hidden, we could have a weapon in

15:08

them. You know, Jan from HR could be

15:10

like, ah, but that's probably not going

15:12

to happen. And yet, that is still how

15:14

our little lion brain works. And so, no

15:17

more hidden hands, no more dead hands,

15:19

no more limp hands. All of that screams

15:22

that somebody could hurt you as opposed

15:24

to, "Hey, open hands mean I want to

15:26

communicate with you. Come here. Look

15:28

how look how harmless I am." You just

15:30

landed your first major client.

15:31

Congrats. This is huge. But here's the

15:33

thing. Big wins come with big exposure.

15:36

One mistake, one mishap, one unexpected

15:38

accident, and that dream contract could

15:40

turn into a nightmare. Next Insurance

15:42

helps owners like you protect what

15:44

you're building. So, you get instant

15:45

online quotes, coverage tailored to your

15:47

specific business, and an instant

15:49

certificate of insurance so you can

15:50

start work immediately. No complicated

15:52

forms, no waiting around for someone in

15:54

a cubicle to approve your livelihood.

15:56

So, whether you're a contractor,

15:58

creator, consultant, cleaning crew, Next

16:00

makes it painless to get protected so

16:02

you can focus on growth. Not what could

16:04

go wrong. Winning is great, but getting

16:06

covered is what keeps those wins. Check

16:08

out next insurance.com/cody and protect

16:10

your first major contract today. The

16:13

other thing that I want you to ponder is

16:14

like maybe you've noticed this in this

16:16

uh little podcast rant that I'm doing

16:18

today for you too is that stories stick

16:20

22 times more than facts which is

16:22

fascinating. The Stanford researcher

16:24

found that people remember stories 22%

16:27

more than statistics alone. Why? Because

16:31

stories activate our sensory cortex, our

16:33

motor cortex, and our limbic system.

16:36

This is kind of like um if all neurons

16:38

were firing at the same time. It's this

16:40

neural coupling that lets the listener

16:43

live your point rather than hear it. Do

16:45

you know what I'm talking about? Like if

16:46

I'm just like, "People remember stories

16:49

22 times more." You're like, "Okay, I

16:51

could remember that number 22%." Like

16:53

that's my rational brain. I can process

16:55

that. But if I said, "Your toddler

16:59

will never touch the stove again." when

17:02

you tell him the story about the first

17:04

time you touched the stove, how much it

17:06

hurt, the pain that he that you had in

17:09

your hand, and uh the toddler then goes

17:12

to touch it and you mimic the feeling of

17:14

how much it hurt and you lick it and

17:15

you're like, "Ah, this feels awful."

17:17

Like, you're going to remember that

17:19

story. So, remember, if you want to

17:21

persuade somebody, even a toddler, tell

17:23

them a story. Don't use a spreadsheet.

17:25

Don't use numbers alone. And that goes

17:27

to this idea of perceptual language,

17:29

which is based on Cornell research. So

17:31

what does perceptual language mean?

17:32

Cornell studies show that people trust

17:34

speakers more when they use language

17:35

based on perception. Let me give you a

17:37

bad example first. We must improve

17:40

operational efficiency. What what does

17:42

that even mean? I I don't fully

17:44

understand. We need to see fewer steps.

17:47

We need smoother handoffs. We need

17:49

cleaner workflows. Your brain likes it

17:51

when they can visualize it. You're like,

17:53

"Okay, 10 steps, two steps. I can see."

17:56

This is why often I like to be on a

17:59

whiteboard when I am explaining complex

18:01

topics. Why? If you were to explain a

18:04

topic to me, I will say I am a visual

18:06

learner. And really that saying, I am a

18:08

visual learner. You're not. Everybody's

18:10

a visual learner. Everybody learns more

18:12

and retains more when they both see it

18:15

and when they are actually able to

18:17

visualize it as opposed to conceptualize

18:20

it. So, you know, I remember one of the

18:23

times that in our business, more than

18:24

any other, we were stuck on a problem.

18:26

And the problem in this particular

18:28

instance was we couldn't figure out how

18:30

we were going to buy this second company

18:32

and integrate it, which is called

18:34

mergers and acquisition, uh, post M&A

18:36

integration. And the reason is because

18:38

we had all of these people. So, you

18:40

could kind of imagine like two org

18:41

charts. They've got people everywhere on

18:43

them. There's dozens of them. I'm like,

18:45

does Jan go here? Does Bob go there?

18:47

It's so overwhelming. And so we were

18:48

talking through it and I realized the

18:50

only difference we needed to do is we

18:52

needed to color code on a whiteboard the

18:54

roles that people had at the varying

18:56

companies and see which one were

18:57

duplicative. So a lesson that was taking

18:59

us I don't know 45 minutes to talk

19:01

through visually we figured out in 10

19:03

minutes when we were talking through it

19:05

verbally when we did it visually we did

19:08

it in less than 10 minutes. And so any

19:10

time that you can do what we call it

19:12

contrarian thinking show don't tell.

19:15

Next, I want you to think about

19:16

replacing these words that I almost

19:18

never want to hear from you again with

19:20

two different ones. I want you to

19:21

replace I think with I've observed. So,

19:24

Columbia University said statements

19:27

framed as observations are seen as 40%

19:30

more credible than statements framed as

19:32

opinions. I think is actually this like

19:35

it's a low confidence signal. I think we

19:37

should do that. Why? Just cuz you feel

19:39

like it. I've observed. Well, that seems

19:42

to tell me that there's data backed

19:44

behind it. So, anywhere you can, you

19:46

should do two things as a CEO and a

19:48

strong communicator. One would be you

19:50

should ask why someone thinks that we

19:52

should do X, Y, or Z. And if you instead

19:56

want to be the one influencing and say,

19:58

I've observed, that's going to lend

19:59

yourself more credibility. You can also

20:02

use these things called temporal

20:03

landmarks because behavioral economists

20:05

found that time anchors drive action.

20:08

So, you know how when you go to a a

20:10

checkout like Black Friday, they'll say

20:12

like, "Right now, today, in the past 10

20:15

minutes, Barb from Iowa just bought this

20:18

new shirt. So did Jan." Like time

20:20

creates this momentum. For some reason,

20:22

when we see somebody putting a limiter

20:24

on it, a time limiter on it will move

20:26

faster. You can also use the cognitive

20:28

snap. So, this is my favorite thing to

20:31

do ever at restaurants. Try it in New

20:34

York City. I don't know why mo most

20:35

people don't do this. It's so simple. I

20:38

want you to use your server's name and

20:40

one detail about them. Oh, Tori, is that

20:44

your name? That's amazing. I love your

20:46

haircut. Uh, I want to order XYZ. Hey,

20:49

Tori, is that your name? That's great.

20:51

Ah, where are you from? Like, it sounds

20:53

like, are you from Australia? One

20:55

specific detail. You can also do this in

20:57

meetings. Hey, John, earlier you

20:59

mentioned your team was stuck. Let me

21:01

show you something. I'd love to get your

21:02

opinion on this. This is called

21:04

self-referencing. So, it's like you're

21:06

you're being referential to them first,

21:10

which makes their brain think, "I'm

21:12

getting a compliment. I'm back in."

21:14

Let's say you're talking to your husband

21:16

and he's not paying attention to you at

21:17

all and he's watching the game and he's

21:21

really wishing you weren't talking to

21:22

him about whatever you're talking to him

21:23

at that moment. I [snorts] want you to

21:25

try this. I want you to just say his

21:27

name. Hey, John. Hey, yesterday you

21:29

mentioned you wanted me to do this and

21:32

see if he then draws back in. This is

21:34

incredible in meetings as a pullback for

21:37

attention. You can also do something

21:38

really simple which in this day and age

21:41

is not that normal, which is open your

21:42

rib cage. This is called postural

21:45

neuroendocrinology.

21:46

There's a mouthful for you. But most of

21:49

us this day and age have what's called a

21:51

closed and a flared rib cage. It's from

21:53

like typing like this too much and short

21:56

breathing. So we kind of only breathe in

21:58

our stomach. So when your rib cage is

22:00

closed like this, it's going to actually

22:03

increase your cortisol. So that's your

22:05

stress and it's going to decrease your

22:07

testosterone, which is like the

22:08

aggressive uh energy that flows through

22:11

us. So when you open your rib cage and

22:14

you raise your arms, that basically

22:16

allows you to have a what's called a

22:18

calm dominance posture. And this is like

22:20

real physiology. This isn't like a super

22:23

man woman posing or anything like that.

22:25

When you roll your shoulders back and

22:27

you open up the ribs, one, you can have

22:29

a stronger voice because your rib cage

22:31

is opening, but also it signals to the

22:33

other person that you're in a dominance

22:35

position. And so you can try that next

22:37

time you want to communicate more fully.

22:39

I certainly uh believe in this more than

22:41

the power posing. And like these small

22:43

things are not meant to like manipulate

22:45

somebody. This is meant for you to

22:47

become a better communicator because I

22:49

think that if we communicate better,

22:51

then our lives get better. we transfer

22:53

more trust and we get the things we want

22:55

and often we help other people get the

22:57

things they want too and so this

22:58

shouldn't be something sneaky you're

23:00

doing we're going to actually talk about

23:03

taking turns and why that builds trust

23:04

faster than agreement and so Harvard

23:07

research shows you don't actually have

23:09

to agree with somebody to build trust

23:12

you just have to share roughly equal

23:14

speaking time literally you can disagree

23:17

with somebody intensely but just give

23:19

them the floor and watch what happens If

23:22

you allow somebody balance or equality,

23:26

they feel it is just as good as

23:27

agreement. And that is why often when

23:30

you're sitting on a panel, like I've had

23:31

to do a panel before on a news station

23:34

where we were on different sides of a

23:36

belief about capitalism and the economy.

23:38

I tended to think it was good. The

23:40

person next to me tended to think that

23:41

socialism was better and that capitalism

23:43

was not good. I could not have disagreed

23:45

with this person more. Let me like get

23:46

that straight. Like I from the bottom

23:48

marrow of my bones, I disagreed with

23:50

this human. I think they were wrong

23:52

about almost everything they said on

23:54

set. But I made a promise to myself in

23:55

the beginning that I would make this

23:56

unemotional and I wanted to give my

23:58

argument. I wanted them to give theirs.

24:00

And so all I did was speak and then

24:03

allow them to speak just as long as I

24:05

did. Now they piped in a few times to

24:08

interrupt me. And what did I do? I

24:10

actually allowed it. I allowed it calmly

24:13

and then I just said, "You know what? I

24:15

just gave you the full 2 minutes. I

24:16

think it's reasonable for you to give it

24:18

back to me. Would that be unreasonable?

24:20

I also love using that would that be

24:22

unreasonable as because it it's

24:24

basically what are they going to say

24:25

no that would be unre it's like you

24:27

can't almost argue with it such a good

24:29

trick question and lo and behold at the

24:31

very end the guy comes up to me goes

24:33

that was incredible I think we agreed

24:34

about a lot I was like I literally don't

24:36

think we could have agreed about less

24:37

but he felt good because I allowed this

24:40

equity in conversation and after you do

24:42

that I want you to end with something

24:43

called a cognitive close not a question

24:46

so what does this mean people follow a

24:49

recommendation ation 60%

24:51

more often than an open-ended question.

24:54

So, I don't want you to end with, "Let

24:56

me know what you think." I want you to

24:59

end with, "Here's what I recommend we do

25:01

next. Here's what we should do next.

25:04

Here's the next steps." That's even

25:06

tighter. Here's the next steps. You're

25:08

just asserting dominance that that is

25:09

going to be what happens next. This is

25:11

all leadership. And as you can tell,

25:13

it's actually not that complex. There's

25:15

a series of little trials we've done as

25:18

humans over time to realize that

25:20

communication is not a soft skill. It's

25:22

not something that you were born with.

25:24

It's not something that only some people

25:26

have. When people say he's an excellent

25:28

communicator, that just means he has

25:30

more data, more reps, and maybe more of

25:32

this research than you do. But now

25:34

you're equally backed. Take three or

25:37

five of these lessons, apply them to

25:39

your life, and learn what it feels like

25:42

to have other people lean in on every

25:44

word that you say. Because the game of

25:47

business and of money is really [music]

25:49

just a game of communication.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.