TRANSCRIPTEnglish

wtf is going on | Meet Kevin Report 5 [Jan 10]

38m 39s7,035 words1,021 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Tik Tok May officially be banned this

0:02

month today's jobs report has everyone

0:04

in the market confused and the Market's

0:08

pretty pissed too could Elon musk's Doge

0:11

fail and how does Walgreen Skyrock at

0:15

27% on the day at the same time as

0:19

California fires continue to rage we get

0:22

debates about politics arson and how in

0:25

the world does California get exposed

0:28

for a 117 million gallon Reservoir right

0:32

above the Pacific Palisades sitting

0:36

empty what is going on must be climate

0:40

change or is it on today's meet Kevin

0:44

report news that makes you money hey a

0:49

quick note in case you haven't realized

0:51

yet I try to put chapter markers at the

0:53

bottom of all of these videos because I

0:54

know sometimes people are looking for a

0:56

quicker video or quicker update just

0:58

look for the chapter markers that apply

1:00

to you the goal of the meet Kevin report

1:01

is to get you as much varied information

1:03

as possible so you can go about your

1:06

daily life without having to try to pay

1:08

attention to every single little bit of

1:10

news that happens instead just remember

1:12

to look for your meet Kevin report every

1:15

single afternoon and I'll provide you a

1:17

recap of everything that I'm watching

1:19

which usually has to do with politics

1:21

finance a real estate and much more so

1:23

if you like that follow along so let's

1:27

get started first Doge there are now

1:29

claims that Elon Musk knows that Doge or

1:33

the department of governmental

1:34

efficiency is going to fail I'd like to

1:36

clarify that this is really just

1:38

twisting what Elon Musk is saying Elon

1:41

Musk says that getting $2 trillion of

1:44

cuts out of the government would end up

1:46

being a goal for Doge but it's a goal

1:49

that they know they might end up missing

1:53

but Elon musk's best case scenario goal

1:55

of $2 trillion of cuts I want to make

1:58

sure I said that correctly trillion ion

2:00

dollar of cuts uh comes as a way of

2:03

saying hey let's aim for the stars or or

2:07

as they like to say let's shoot for the

2:08

moon and even if we miss we'll end up

2:11

amongst the Stars right this is a way of

2:13

him saying look if we aim for two

2:15

trillion in Cuts maybe we get $1

2:17

trillion of cuts and we still see that

2:20

as a potential Boon and success Elon

2:24

says there's no shortage of being able

2:27

to cut from the government expenditures

2:29

because quite frankly when people are

2:31

spending other people's money it's

2:33

really easy to find places to cut so

2:36

Elon Musk is really optimistic in Doge

2:38

and I don't think he's really claiming

2:40

that he thinks doge is going to fail but

2:42

that's not stopping critics of Elon

2:44

musk's from from saying oh doge is going

2:47

to be a big failure I mean frankly let's

2:49

see what they can do do I think that uh

2:52

government gridlock is going to enable

2:54

all of the change that they want to

2:56

accomplish no of course not I mean it

2:58

was hard enough to get speaker Johnson

3:00

you know approved you almost had

3:02

Republicans vote against speaker Johnson

3:06

and then we would have had a democratic

3:08

speaker of the house and that's before

3:10

Trump even gets into office so the

3:12

margins are razor thin for Congress to

3:14

actually authorize certain things this

3:16

is where a lot of people hope Donald

3:18

Trump can just remove expenses via

3:21

executive

3:22

action but we'll see so I'm still

3:26

positive on Doge and I just want to

3:28

clarify I don't think Elon Musk thinks

3:30

doge is going to be a failure but he

3:33

knows there are challenges up ahead on

3:36

macro obviously a big deal today the

3:39

jobs report came out now it's worth

3:41

looking at some reactions first Goldman

3:43

Sachs thinks after this jobs report that

3:45

we're only looking at maybe two rate

3:47

Cuts this year the first potentially

3:49

getting kicked back to June Bank of

3:51

America actually thinks rate increases

3:54

are no more are now more likely than

3:56

rate Cuts JP Morgan only sees two rate

4:00

Cuts this year and City Bank thinks the

4:02

earliest cut we're going to get is May

4:06

right now markets are pricing in for the

4:09

first cut in interest rate policy to

4:12

come sometime between June and July by

4:16

July we get to about a minus 83 basis

4:20

point move so we don't actually fully

4:23

price in a full cut until September of

4:27

2025 with only a 2% chance chance of

4:30

actually getting a cut in January and a

4:31

25% chance of a cut in March now why is

4:36

this happening well it's all happening

4:38

because of the jobs report that we got

4:39

this morning and I have to tell you the

4:41

jobs report was actually really

4:43

impressive Goldman Sachs yesterday

4:45

thought jobs would come in at 120 to

4:48

125,000 I personally thought we would

4:49

have gotten something around

4:50

expectations around 165,000 mostly

4:53

because I didn't think you would start

4:55

to see layoffs in December you usually

4:57

see them in January Feb March but we

4:59

were both wrong we actually got 256,000

5:02

jobs which was a four Sigma beat over

5:06

the average four standard deviation beat

5:08

over the average estimate which kind of

5:10

makes you wonder like what's the point

5:11

of all these Wall Street estimates but

5:13

anyway average hourly earnings matched

5:15

and this should be really good news

5:18

because as I said yesterday hey if we

5:20

get anything close to expectations it's

5:21

going to be good because it means we're

5:23

not running into a recession like if we

5:25

got a minus 100K it'd be recessionary

5:28

well we got 256 which is is like the

5:30

opposite of recession but it's so far

5:32

the opposite of recession and we spent a

5:35

lot of time in the course member live

5:36

stream about an hour this morning

5:37

talking about this and strategies but

5:41

this is so far above expectations that

5:43

markets actually sold off today uh

5:47

because the news is so good that some

5:51

people actually think I mean here's the

5:52

NASDAQ down you know 1.56% today uh and

5:56

uh you know Bitcoin bouncing around 94k

5:58

I think even Tesla Tesla was mostly flat

6:01

and trading most of the day but

6:02

obviously ended slightly red there uh

6:04

but the point is these numbers are so

6:06

good that people are now concerned the

6:08

Federal Reserve is going to talk about

6:10

hiking again as inflation potentially

6:12

takes hold now the good news here to

6:15

sort of offset this is ghoul spe over at

6:19

the Federal Reserve I give this guy

6:21

respect okay I I actually originally

6:22

when he came on the scene everybody's

6:24

like Ah that's fool speed who is this

6:26

guy right nobody gave this guy any

6:27

credit at all uh and to say I mean it

6:30

was you know everybody kind of hopped on

6:31

the bandwagon there because he was kind

6:33

of this newer weird kind of guy who was

6:35

like well everything's fine know this is

6:37

going to happen and so people thought he

6:39

was a little goofy I have to say his

6:42

interview on CNBC this morning which we

6:43

watched during the course member live

6:45

stream as well is actually really good

6:47

he says look the speed of cutting is

6:49

going to slow and that is going to

6:50

affect long rates but we have to pay

6:53

attention to the uninverted

6:57

because we are normalizing or is

7:01

something else going on now this is

7:03

really interesting because this is the

7:05

first like reasonable fed member that

7:07

I'm hearing actually saying there are

7:09

two risks here we could actually be

7:13

potentially overtightening and then

7:15

cause a crash so we have to be careful

7:17

not to do that especially in the face of

7:19

good data and then Sarah Eisen comes and

7:22

goes but what about inflation you know

7:23

12-month inflation is up uh and and it's

7:26

barely making any progress and look I

7:28

respect Sarah a lot but gouby shut her

7:32

down hard he goes look Sarah the

7:35

beginning of 2024 had a bump in

7:37

inflation and the 12-month figures count

7:40

that but if you ignore that bump at the

7:43

end of last year and look at what's

7:45

happened over the last 6 months which is

7:47

much more recent data the pce levels are

7:51

at just

7:52

1.6% with core PC sitting at 2.2% over

7:56

the last 6 months which means if we

7:58

continue what is happened the last 6

8:00

months in the next 6 months those

8:02

12-month readings which we're going to

8:04

be lapping those higher q1 numbers are

8:07

actually going to mean we're below

8:08

Target on inflation now I want to be

8:11

clear that's kind of a brilliant

8:13

analysis because just yesterday we were

8:15

talking about how we're going to be

8:16

lapping higher inflation from last year

8:18

and we'll probably get lower numbers CPI

8:20

and PPI come out next week and Bloomberg

8:23

intelligence actually thinks that

8:24

markets might rally going into CPI and

8:26

PPI as people start digesting okay okay

8:29

okay no no this is actually good

8:31

inflation is down and the economy is

8:33

strong thanks to this jobs report

8:35

honestly I agree with this I

8:37

substantially increased my bare bull

8:40

scale today because I'm like wait this

8:42

is like this is actually fantastic

8:44

because I don't believe that inflation

8:45

is going to stick around and I agree

8:47

with gouls but I'm grateful that he's

8:49

analyzing both sides of the equation

8:52

look everybody's going to have a

8:53

different opinion on this and obviously

8:54

time will tell especially in the face of

8:56

tariffs but what he says is there's not

8:59

not a lot of evidence right now that the

9:00

economy is overheating and the FED has

9:02

to be careful that they don't go too far

9:05

to the tightening side because what if

9:07

the yield curve is actually signaling

9:09

something worse to us what if we got was

9:12

actually and he used this word what if

9:14

what we've been getting is actually

9:17

transitory productivity where you had a

9:20

2023 and 2024 that was boosted up by

9:23

artificial intelligence productivity

9:25

that was really just a lot of capex

9:26

spending and new investment into this

9:28

sort of AI world but what if that starts

9:30

fading away and we don't get those

9:32

year-over-year gains anymore for

9:34

productivity then you're left with

9:36

transitory productivity and you

9:38

potentially end up having a productivity

9:40

either flatlining or crash in 2025 or 6

9:45

so this is interesting and I'm actually

9:47

grateful to hear these perspectives

9:48

because I appreciated his debate with

9:50

Sarah Eisen and I appreciate this

9:52

perspective that he's aware of the yield

9:54

curve either signaling a normalization

9:56

or something worse historically the

9:58

yield curve doing what it's doing is

10:00

really bad but then again this data

10:02

today was really good right so it's like

10:05

ah this is very confusing uh and as far

10:07

as uh productivity growth interesting

10:10

perspective now when I look deeper into

10:12

the job numbers I couldn't find anything

10:15

that was bad you know me look I'm a data

10:17

kind of person when the data is bad I

10:20

tell you it's bad and then people like

10:22

to leave comments like oh you're just

10:24

being a bear when the data is good

10:26

people leave me comment and then I talk

10:27

about how the data is good people like

10:29

oh you're a flip-flopper or you're just

10:32

a blind bull you just can't win when

10:34

you're reporting this stuff but I will

10:36

say I looked for something bad in

10:38

today's jobs report and either the jobs

10:40

report is total BS and it's all going to

10:42

get revised away next year or it was

10:45

actually pretty good the household

10:46

revisions we were looking for no real

10:48

change in fact we showed 478,000 uh job

10:52

gains in the household report which is

10:54

usually noisy but that's way up from the

10:56

negative reads we had the last couple uh

10:58

reads

10:59

the jobs growth was actually pretty well

11:02

Diversified too 33,000 in government

11:05

education and Healthcare 80 but we also

11:06

got 43k in Leisure and Hospitality 28k

11:09

in Business and Professional 10K in it

11:11

43.9k in

11:13

trade this was a diversified good

11:19

report so why then is the market falling

11:22

well honestly I think it's just drisking

11:25

and de grossing by institutions usually

11:27

when the market Falls right the market

11:29

open as it did right here see this drop

11:32

right at the market open to the low of

11:34

the day or going into the close look at

11:37

this bleed into the cloth it's a sign of

11:39

institutional or even fund deg grossing

11:42

where people are taking risk off the

11:44

table and they're saying look things are

11:45

maybe priced to Perfection right now

11:47

let's just wait and see now I'm not

11:49

encouraging anybody do that I'm really

11:51

not making any encouragement at all I'm

11:52

just letting you know what I'm observing

11:54

is that's probably why we're seeing some

11:56

negativity especially since there's been

11:58

some risking in debt payoff since the

12:01

December 18th flip-flop of the Federal

12:03

Reserve because see you've got two camps

12:05

at the FED you've got the Jerome POW

12:07

Camp who are basically like no man

12:10

everything's fine economy is great we

12:13

won and then you've got the ghoul spe

12:16

that are like not so fast you know there

12:18

there could be reasons why we had this

12:22

good bump in

12:23

2324 will it

12:26

last small note somebody got mad at me

12:28

yesterday for saying Trump bump because

12:30

they thought it refers to a trump

12:33

pregnancy bump I don't think they

12:35

actually thought I meant that but they

12:36

just didn't like the illusion of that or

12:39

picturing Donald Trump pregnant okay

12:40

this is why are we talking about this

12:42

anyway University of Michigan

12:43

expectations beat on current conditions

12:45

but the onee and the 5 to 10 year

12:47

inflation reads all beat at 3.3% it's

12:51

not good because it sort of reactivates

12:53

this fear that people have that

12:54

inflation is going to come

12:56

back we'll see uh anyway

13:00

Bloomberg calls this situation A lose

13:02

lose where they basically say the Donald

13:05

Trump small cap trade has now gotten

13:07

hosed and a lot of the gains you're

13:09

seeing in Donald Trump trades are sort

13:11

of fading uh in fact if you go jump over

13:15

to the Russell 2000 you could see the

13:17

peak here in the summer you could see

13:19

the peak that we had post Trump we are

13:21

now below both of those Peaks I've been

13:25

a big proponent of staying away from

13:27

small caps because I see them as

13:28

disproportionate risky if we end up

13:30

going into a recession anyway uh you've

13:34

also got Bloomberg saying that any sign

13:36

of growth now which we're hoping to get

13:38

really good numbers from Q4 earnings

13:40

from tech companies and others any signs

13:43

of growth might actually just make the

13:45

Federal Reserve more aggressive which

13:47

means potentially if you get a Fed that

13:49

wants to even talk about or even

13:51

remotely think about raising rates again

13:53

you actually end up with a 2022 Market

13:56

sell-off scenario again versus a

13:58

recession induc SM itself it seems like

14:00

no matter what the mainstream media is

14:01

telling you everything's going to crash

14:03

and I'm I'm just starting to get really

14:05

skeptical of it all because the numbers

14:07

today were good and if they continue

14:09

like this it's going to turn into a buy

14:11

the dip opportunity I don't know anyway

14:13

China's Central Bank has suspended the

14:15

purchases of treasuries on Friday uh

14:17

citing a shortage of bonds this is

14:20

basically a way of them trying to say

14:21

hey stop making bond yields go so low

14:25

you are screwing up the market and

14:27

making everybody think we're going into

14:29

a deflationary spiral how dare you this

14:31

is really normal interventionism from

14:33

China in fact Xin ping was apparently so

14:36

pissed at an economist who said that uh

14:39

the you know Chinese government is uh

14:43

you know misleading people with their

14:45

data and the data is probably worse than

14:48

uh uh or the data is probably looking a

14:50

lot better than what the reality in

14:52

China is that person end up getting

14:54

censored by uh xiin ping almost directly

14:58

uh and the Chinese government is saying

15:00

hey look look look everything's fine in

15:02

fact y all should stop betting on excess

15:05

expectation for monetary stimulus

15:07

because everything's fine okay so the

15:10

POV of the Chinese government and

15:12

Central Bank basically the same thing is

15:14

we don't need a stimulate more because

15:15

everything's fine our data is good and

15:17

the Market's

15:21

like you get it anyway uh China's Autos

15:25

there was a front page story of this on

15:26

the Wall Street Journal I actually don't

15:28

think I have handr it doesn't matter

15:29

front page story on the Wall Street

15:30

Journal this morning they talk about an

15:32

elimination round coming for automotive

15:34

manufacturers because of an inventory

15:35

glut in 2025 and even though demand Rose

15:38

5.5% in 2024 demand is far short of what

15:43

the capacity is for Autos which means

15:45

you could expect uh some more price Wars

15:47

for Autos in 2025 and 26 Walgreens

15:51

indicated fresh signs of stability with

15:52

an earnings per share beat adjusted

15:54

earnings per share beat they actually

15:56

lost money their adjusted EPS this

15:58

adjusted numberers ridiculous came in at

16:00

52 cents versus 40 uh 38 cents expected

16:03

and keep in mind adjusted EPS numbers

16:05

they're usually designed to remove

16:07

things that are like one time in nature

16:08

so yes sometimes they make sense but

16:10

people hear that and then they think the

16:11

company's making money I just want to be

16:13

very clear the company is losing

16:16

money but we will go through some of the

16:18

good numbers sales came in greater than

16:20

expected 39.4 billion versus 37.3

16:23

expected even International and

16:25

Healthcare numbers beat slightly which

16:27

was good their operating cash flow flow

16:29

is negative 140 million but their free

16:31

cash flow is actually positive almost a

16:33

couple hundred million because they're

16:35

selling and liquidating assets and

16:37

locations that they have so watch for

16:40

that you know usually when companies are

16:42

selling their assets to have positive

16:44

cash flows because they're out of cash

16:46

and quite frankly they kind of are they

16:47

do have inventories and receivables

16:50

they've got inventories around $10

16:51

billion and receivables around $6

16:53

billion but they've got AC crude

16:54

expenses of $27 billion and less than a

16:58

billion of cash another $300 million in

17:01

marketable Securities so when you add

17:02

all that together they do not have a lot

17:05

of

17:06

cash to pay for all of the current debts

17:09

that they have they have $27 billion due

17:11

in the next year and they have less than

17:13

18 in the bank if you include

17:15

inventories and receivables this is why

17:18

they're trying to get bought out by a

17:19

private Equity deal but the problem is

17:21

the company's got $5.9 billion in

17:23

litigation expenses that are acred

17:25

payables which aren't something you

17:27

could just burn like carvon burn the

17:29

bond holders it's it's a lot harder to

17:31

do that with litigation expenses that

17:32

you owe people or other long-term debts

17:35

so TBD how this company is going to claw

17:37

its way out of debt but In fairness

17:39

their sales did grow 7.4% year-over-year

17:41

although their cost of goods sold

17:43

increased so their gross profit was flat

17:45

which means their margin

17:47

compressed Donald Trump was

17:49

unconditionally discharged via his

17:51

sentence so therefore he is convicted of

17:53

fraud but will suffer no jail time or

17:56

monetary penalties Donald Trump Trump

17:59

commented on him and Obama talking

18:00

yesterday and suggesting hey there is a

18:02

beautiful service yesterday yes I talked

18:04

to Obama and we got along it's worth

18:06

noting we just have different

18:08

philosophies you know I thought that was

18:10

actually a pretty mature thing there of

18:12

Donald Trump to say which is a little

18:13

different but I thought it was still

18:15

kind of funny for what John fedman said

18:18

when he came out of the meeting uh at

18:20

maralago with Donald Trump first

18:22

Democratic cator by the senator by the

18:24

way to meet Donald Trump after the

18:26

election uh and he says he's meeting

18:28

Donald Trump because he's a senator for

18:30

all pennsylvanians not just Democrats

18:32

big fan of that by the way like that a

18:35

lot when he walked out of the meeting

18:36

apparently he said that he demanded

18:39

Donald Trump make him the pope of

18:43

Greenland another news fetman also said

18:46

that he would be thrilled to work with

18:47

Donald Trump on solving the dreamers

18:49

issue these are children who entered the

18:51

United States illegally because of the

18:52

acts of their parents but then grew up

18:54

here and grew up as Americans but never

18:56

became

18:57

legal Facebook was on The Joe Rogan

19:00

podcast to speak about the Biden

19:02

Administration and Biden Administration

19:04

officials yelling and swearing at

19:07

Facebook officials demanding that even

19:09

true information or memes be censored

19:11

and taken down Zuck said they had to say

19:15

no often but as soon as they said no too

19:18

often to the Biden Administration quote

19:20

all of a sudden all of these agencies of

19:22

the government wanted to come after

19:24

Facebook and meta and frankly this isn't

19:26

a big secret given that what we saw with

19:29

the Twitter files revealed exactly this

19:31

the government especially the Biden

19:33

Administration weaponizing the FBI or

19:36

contacts within the White House to get

19:38

in touch with larger social media

19:40

companies to shape narratives Mark

19:43

Zuckerberg says that one of the reasons

19:45

Donald Trump won was probably because of

19:47

the free flow of information on X

19:49

exposing a different perspective to the

19:51

narratives that exist otherwise in a

19:54

more censored realm now this is not Mark

19:56

Zuckerberg saying that it's good for uh

19:59

you know people to be able to make

20:01

threats or break laws or whatever just

20:03

like I don't think it's Mark Zuckerberg

20:05

saying we should have censorship I think

20:08

Mark Zuck is actually just taking a

20:09

pretty reasonable approach here and it

20:11

really marks this flip-flop from their

20:14

prior stance where previously it seemed

20:16

like Mark Zuck was all for sort of

20:17

Defending what the Biden Administration

20:19

was doing especially with the amount of

20:20

money that they've donated to people

20:22

like the G uh you know Gavin Newsome's

20:24

re-election campaigns or the Biden

20:26

Administration and it feels like now now

20:29

that all of this is sort of getting

20:30

exposed suck is kind of like yeah yeah

20:33

yeah I'm on the winning team after all

20:35

so like I I kind of still take what Mark

20:39

Zuck says with a grain of salt we knew

20:41

this stuff was going on and I'm grateful

20:44

that he's starting to flip-flop but I

20:46

still have some questions about you know

20:48

the true motives of this recent yeah

20:51

we're going to a community notes uh X

20:53

style musk

20:55

style POV that they have anyway uh

20:59

regarding Tik Tok uh this is going to be

21:01

a really interesting one uh Tik Tok okay

21:07

the Supreme Court today is hearing oral

21:09

arguments about a Tik tok's ban Tik Tok

21:12

is expected to be banned this month and

21:13

Republicans and Democrats agree that Tik

21:15

Tok is a threat to National Security

21:17

it's worth noting that every time you

21:18

open up Tik tock on your phone unless

21:21

you've already given them permissions

21:23

the app basically demands it's annoying

21:25

like every time can we have access to

21:26

your contact can we have access to your

21:28

contact s they basically just download

21:30

all your contacts and beam them up to

21:31

China even though they say they hold the

21:33

American data in American based servers

21:36

the same data that's supposed to be on

21:38

American based servers has been found

21:40

through hacks in chinese-based servers

21:42

so like copies are being stored in China

21:45

there was obviously a lot to talk about

21:47

this because there's a balance between

21:48

the potential for disinformation

21:50

campaigns put together by the Chinese

21:52

government the CCP but then also data

21:54

Gathering of all of our contacts and

21:55

what we're doing and what we're looking

21:56

at but then also trying to back bance

21:58

people's right to free speech right now

22:01

it looks like the court doesn't give a

22:02

flying honies about the right to free

22:04

speech given that there's so many other

22:05

ways to express yourself which does suck

22:07

for Tik Tok creators but they argue that

22:10

hey look they're collecting too much

22:12

information and they could influence our

22:14

uh uh Society in in a way that we don't

22:17

like and if we ban if we uphold this ban

22:19

of Tik Tok then it will force Tik Tok to

22:22

divest which basically means sell the

22:23

American portion of their business bite

22:25

dance owns them so B dance would have to

22:27

divest that part China though says we

22:29

are going to block the sale of Tik Tok

22:31

if the Tik Tok algorithm goes with it to

22:34

the American company so they want the

22:37

algorithm so this is going to be really

22:39

interesting and it probably will set up

22:41

a boost to YouTube and meta because they

22:44

also have short form content which is

22:46

probably exactly why Mark Zuckerberg is

22:48

starting to flip-flop in this way

22:49

because he's setting up for maybe an

22:51

influx of viewers who use Tik Tok who

22:54

are like yeah man Zuck is cool now

22:59

oh boy all right you ready for the next

23:01

part California fires here we

23:04

go all right so let's talk a little bit

23:07

of History first now 10 people are dead

23:08

but which is absolutely terrible but we

23:10

got to talk about what's going on with

23:11

this stockpiling of water uh California

23:14

approved State borrowing in 2014 for

23:17

about $75 billion dollar because of

23:19

major droughts through proposition one

23:21

to build more reservoirs uh that was 10

23:24

years ago as of 2021 3 years ago the

23:27

Associated Press said that none of these

23:29

six plus planned reservoirs had received

23:32

any money or started construction now

23:33

the largest planned Reservoir would be a

23:35

proposed Lake in Northern California

23:38

which would be the largest project in

23:39

over 40 years and people have been

23:41

talking about this project for 50 years

23:43

but because of quote shifts in political

23:45

priorities it never happened part of

23:47

that is because the environmental review

23:49

permitting and water rights processes

23:51

take so freaking long the completion of

23:53

this Reservoir is not expected until at

23:55

the earliest 2030 if we even begin

23:59

Construction in

24:00

2026 this is because in California

24:02

people like Jerry Brown who actually

24:04

used to be the governor say that man for

24:06

every year of construction you want to

24:07

do expect three years of planning

24:08

permitting and Engineering in California

24:11

opponents say oh well you're going to

24:13

use too much water on Mixing concrete

24:15

and you're going to have to remove old

24:17

buildings and relocate cemeteries and we

24:20

don't want you to relocate our old stuff

24:22

or you're going to mess with our fish

24:24

habitats after all climate change is

24:27

causing these fire why are you trying to

24:29

go around and build more dams well the

24:31

reality is California gets or dams or

24:34

reservoirs well the reality is

24:35

California gets plenty of water the

24:39

issue is it all runs off that's because

24:42

when we get snow melt on the Sierra

24:44

nadaas which then melts off during the

24:46

Spring most of that water doesn't get

24:49

captured because we don't have the

24:51

infrastructure to capture it all we used

24:53

to build these projects back in the

24:55

1960s through the state Water Project we

24:57

approved and built over 10 dams and

25:00

California blew up its ability to

25:02

actually collect more water back when

25:04

our population was half the size of what

25:06

it is

25:07

today but then people got upset because

25:10

salmon and steelhead trout which you

25:12

know AR aren't endangered uh and can be

25:15

farm raised or raised somewhere else

25:17

were slightly having their River

25:19

habitats diverted and therefore they

25:21

couldn't get to where they nest and

25:24

everything paused this is how in the

25:26

1970s we got squa which was was a Ronald

25:29

Reagan law that essentially allowed

25:31

anybody with any beneficial or potential

25:33

affected interest from any kind of

25:36

project housing Transit infrastructure

25:38

drilling solar Farms you name it to be

25:40

able to Sue and hold up projects in

25:43

litigation until environmental equality

25:47

is determined now Newsome says that he's

25:50

able to get projects through the red

25:52

tape faster through proposals like which

25:55

which have been passed like a Senate

25:57

Bill 149 which was supposed to limit

25:59

these blockages to 270-day challenges

26:02

but that's only if they're approved by

26:04

the government as a by the governor

26:06

actually as a pet project of the

26:07

governor so you can imagine only the

26:09

Democratic projects get through because

26:10

he's a Democratic governor with the

26:11

Democratic legislature and now all of a

26:13

sudden what nothing ends up getting done

26:16

in fact this Reservoir that people want

26:18

to build up in uh kaloa County might

26:22

begin Construction in

26:23

2026 maybe and it'll take 6 years to

26:27

build

26:29

likely some people hope 2030 but I don't

26:31

have hope that that it's actually going

26:32

to get done by 2030 so the point is

26:34

California really sucks at building when

26:36

you need to nobody has the balls to

26:38

actually issue an executive order and

26:40

build what we need and then solve the

26:43

side effects later everybody wants to

26:44

stop and litigate every potential side

26:47

effect first and then nothing ends up

26:50

getting done much like for example the

26:52

Santa yanz Reservoir sitting empty above

26:55

the Pacific Palisades which could have

26:57

fed the D amam hydrants that went dry in

27:02

California uh during this fire that's

27:04

going on the Pacific Palisades I kid you

27:06

not look at this here's the Getty via

27:09

and the Pacific Palisades which we're

27:10

going to talk about the fade of the

27:11

Getty via in just a moment and what it

27:13

can actually tell us about climate

27:14

change or fire prevention measures

27:16

you'll hear about that in just a moment

27:18

and you can see this higher in elevation

27:19

San YZ Reservoir is right here and it h

27:23

it houses 117 million gallons of water

27:26

the three tanks that serve the Palisade

27:28

hold about 1 million gallons each so

27:30

that's you know what 30 times as much

27:33

water right up here than those three

27:35

tanks combined actually well what do you

27:37

got yeah more than that it's almost four

27:39

times as many gallons of water up there

27:41

uh and that Reservoir is empty yeah the

27:45

left laning LA Times just did a whole

27:47

expose about how this facility sits

27:49

above the hydrant that ranra and it has

27:51

been out of service due to a tear in the

27:53

cover and nobody has any idea as to when

27:56

it's going to be brought back into

27:57

service because the politicians just

27:59

don't pay attention to it at all so yeah

28:02

has there been an empty Reservoir yep

28:04

could it have helped mitigate some of

28:06

the damage that caused in the Palisades

28:08

yep now what do we have to deal with it

28:10

as well or I guess instead well the

28:13

potential that all of these lost 9,000

28:16

single family dwellings and apartments

28:17

are going to cause a lot of rent

28:18

inflation given that just 24.3 th000

28:21

were granted permits in LA county in

28:23

2023 and you just lost 9,000 of them

28:26

that are already built or we're already

28:28

built now they're burned down California

28:30

climate change is the big excuse that

28:32

people have people say oh well you know

28:34

this is climate change uh but the

28:36

reality is California has been

28:38

experiencing Fires for thousands of

28:39

years now yes fires have gotten worse

28:41

but there might be a reason they've

28:43

gotten worse first though one of the

28:44

reasons we know the fires have been

28:46

happening here for thousands of years is

28:47

because chapparall shrubs like lilacs

28:50

and manzanitas in California have

28:52

adapted to getting burned down and then

28:55

their Roots stay alive they sprout up

28:58

again and now there's no competition for

29:00

resources and these plants can flourish

29:04

they're literally evolutionary

29:06

predisposed to fires and surviving

29:10

through them kind of crazy but it shows

29:12

you that look we've always had fires in

29:13

California now people say oh but winds

29:16

have gotten worse and that may be true

29:18

and certainly temperatures have been

29:20

warmer and the periods of time that

29:23

things have been drier have been longer

29:25

so yeah there is some argument that the

29:28

environment certainly has changed over

29:30

time but it's hard to say if it's

29:33

changing uh more or if that change is

29:35

more impactful on Fires or what we're

29:37

doing is more impactful on Fires see in

29:40

the past fires would Sprout out all of

29:43

the time in California but they were

29:45

generally smaller fires because they

29:46

would burn and then they burn out and

29:48

because they were happening all of the

29:50

time before you know humans were

29:52

inhabiting California you were regularly

29:54

doing guess what clearing the dead

29:57

plants see Nature by itself was

30:00

previously limiting really big fires

30:04

because you had natural smaller fires

30:08

that burned away that brush that's

30:10

sitting dry everywhere so nothing's

30:12

really changed except we sto the small

30:16

fires when times are not super windy

30:18

we're really good at fighting and

30:20

putting out those small fires so we put

30:22

out the small fires but then when we get

30:24

a windy day we get screwed because

30:26

nobody's been conducting or we certainly

30:28

haven't been conducting as many

30:29

controlled Burns to mitigate some of

30:31

that leftover dry brush and then a heavy

30:34

wind comes through and we get a Mega

30:37

catastrophic fire that then Burns lots

30:39

of homes with it now yes this is an

30:42

argument that managing our land actually

30:45

matters in fact if you listen to what

30:47

the Getty via said it's pretty

30:49

incredible listen to how the Getty via

30:50

says they survived they said that they

30:53

survived despite the fire coming right

30:55

up to their property how because per the

30:58

at the gy Via they extensively cleared

31:00

brush their tree canopies were kept high

31:03

above the grounds any low Ling brush had

31:06

been thinned so much to where when some

31:09

of these low Ling brush actually caught

31:11

fire they said it would just burn up

31:13

like Roseberry on the top of pizza and

31:15

then put itself out because there was so

31:17

little to burn they'd catch fire oh my

31:19

gosh fire and they'd burn themselves out

31:22

there were small fires like at the

31:23

entrance Gates that were put out by fire

31:25

extinguishers but otherwise they fought

31:28

the fire with limited Water by

31:30

conducting preventative measures that

31:33

helped save the Getty via Historic

31:35

Museum this actually goes to show that

31:38

there is a way you can manage the land

31:42

now finally the LA Times is in the area

31:44

planes are apparently now getting hit by

31:46

drones that are floating around which is

31:48

not good you have to be careful because

31:50

the water capturing drones that exist uh

31:53

or sorry the water planes uh they're

31:55

called super scoopers that exist in

31:58

California uh they uh they fly very very

32:01

low a super scooper plane is about a $30

32:03

million plane it flies uh it's usually

32:07

down to about 100 ft above the Earth to

32:10

drop water larger boeings will usually

32:13

only get down to about 400t above the

32:15

ground uh AGL above ground level uh and

32:18

so these get pretty low into that that 0

32:21

to 400 range where drones will fly and

32:23

this is why generally they don't want

32:24

people flying drones in the fire areas

32:26

because of these efforts one of these

32:28

Canadian planes was damaged in the

32:30

process who were helping and now this

32:32

plane is grounded which kind of sucks

32:34

because you don't want these 30 million

32:36

doll vehicles that are actually really

32:37

effective to be grounded they can dump

32:39

up to 1,400 gallons of water in in a

32:41

swoop it's incredible the National Guard

32:43

has finally showed up in La meanwhile

32:45

Newsome is complaining about

32:46

misinformation and disinformation to

32:48

Biden via Zoom there are also rumors

32:50

circulating unconfirmed right now but

32:52

there are rumors circulating that

32:54

California at the moment uh is uh um

32:58

considering rezoning the Pacific

33:00

Palisades to allow for multif family

33:02

home construction as opposed to single

33:04

family construction this is leading

33:06

people to say this was all the plan all

33:08

along they wanted to make you know Cal

33:10

here look at this it's a crazy video

33:11

shot they wanted to burn California down

33:13

specifically the Palisades so they could

33:14

bring in more low-income

33:17

housing now I I I don't I don't think

33:19

that's exactly why these fires were

33:21

caused but I will agree that there

33:23

probably are murmurings about rezoning

33:26

because of this and people want to be

33:27

able to rebuild their single family

33:29

homes but the permit process is probably

33:32

going to make all of that massive

33:35

hell especially since the insurance

33:37

process is probably going to take a hot

33:40

minute I should say no pun intended

33:42

there anyway when it comes to Insurance

33:44

uh State Farm obviously issued uh a

33:46

letter to 72,000 policies that they will

33:48

not renew in March uh they and and

33:51

another underwriter called chub said

33:53

that they wouldn't underwrite policies

33:55

anymore in California and you have to

33:57

say look everybody hates insurance but

33:59

the reality is when politicians are

34:01

letting reservoirs go dry and hydrants

34:03

fail you got to kind of ask if you were

34:06

an insurance company would you trust

34:09

Nome was doing all that he could be

34:11

doing to minimize your risk as an

34:13

insurance

34:14

company no of course not and then at the

34:18

same time California is telling you you

34:19

can't raise your prices to try to help

34:22

voters not have to pay higher insurance

34:24

claims which don't get me wrong nobody

34:26

or premiums nobody wants to pay pay

34:27

higher insurance premiums but you also

34:29

understand that when politicians are

34:30

making it more expensive for businesses

34:32

to operate the businesses are like this

34:34

doesn't make sense in fact the editorial

34:37

board of the Wall Street Journal had a

34:38

great math claim to this they're like

34:40

look it right now cost insurance company

34:43

uh insurance companies

34:45

$19 in expenses and claims for every $1

34:50

they collect in premiums that doesn't

34:51

even account for operating expenses they

34:53

have to exist so they literally just

34:55

light money on fire trying to work in

34:57

California California is like n we don't

35:00

need to let you know we don't need to

35:02

fix our stupid problems in California

35:04

let's just come up with the California

35:05

fair plan which will be a state-backed

35:08

no liability protection fallback

35:11

catastrophic insurance plan and that'll

35:14

provide property coverage up to $3

35:16

million cool except here's the problem

35:18

with that there are probably way many

35:21

more people on the California fair plan

35:23

right now than the fund actually has

35:24

money for the fund only has $700 million

35:27

in cash which is enough for about 350

35:29

homes and we just lost 9,000 structures

35:31

now they're not all on the fair plan but

35:33

the point is you probably have more than

35:35

350 homes in the Palisades you know two

35:38

billion $2 million cost to rebuild each

35:40

on there but that's okay that's not

35:43

going to stop people like Steve Lopez

35:45

the same knucklehead that the other day

35:47

said it's a compromise to live in

35:49

California and you should pay over 50%

35:51

in taxes for no water and fire hydrants

35:55

and accept the compromise of living in

35:58

California with forest fires and

36:00

wildfires the reason you should accept

36:02

this is because that's just that's just

36:04

the price to pay to live in California

36:06

well that same clown has struck again

36:10

yesterday fires are compromise a

36:12

compromise of living in California today

36:14

going to Ghana because the mayor of Los

36:16

Angeles went to Ghana you know and and

36:19

was gone she was Ghana uh while uh the

36:22

uh fire started even though we knew the

36:24

catastrophic winds were coming has now

36:26

written in the LA times today quote

36:28

generally speaking I don't have a

36:29

problem with the mayor of Los Angeles

36:32

traveling the world particularly when

36:34

it's about fostering economic and

36:36

cultural relationships that can benefit

36:38

Los Angeles got it going to Ghana as the

36:42

mayor of La helps our culture and our

36:46

economy understood thanks Steve Lopez

36:50

I'mma plan my trip to Ghana to make sure

36:52

I'm doing my part and keeping the

36:53

economy up meanwhile I actually sent him

36:57

an email

36:58

and that email that I sent him is on

37:00

screen right now to which Michael Jones

37:04

replies

37:06

[Laughter]

37:07

succinct oh boy okay uh what else do we

37:11

have uh then we've got the HOA talks

37:13

about arson and there's been you know

37:15

there was a lot of talk and there were

37:17

videos of an arsonist potentially

37:18

getting arrested yesterday but they were

37:20

arrested for a different fenel and the

37:23

police actually said that they didn't

37:24

have enough evidence that he was

37:25

actually an arsonist a lot of people

37:27

think there are professional arsonists

37:29

going around doing all of this which is

37:30

possible but we just it's too soon to

37:32

tell on this so uh with that said in

37:34

yesterday's Daily Wealth email I had a

37:37

question for you where are you in your

37:40

real estate Journey most importantly

37:43

what's next for you if you're a tenant

37:45

are you becoming an owner forget about

37:47

rates just start smaller it'll make a

37:49

great rental property in the future if

37:51

you already own a house when are you

37:52

buying a second if you own a house in a

37:54

rental when are you buying your next I

37:56

want you to always be thinking about

37:58

wedge deals and getting ahead in your

38:01

Investments while at the same time

38:03

thinking about yesterday's dad joke and

38:06

today's in case yesterday's dad joke

38:08

went over your head or below your knees

38:10

the answer to yesterday's dad joke was

38:13

well let me rephrase yesterday's dad

38:15

joke yesterday's job dad joke was I

38:18

ordered a chicken and egg on Amazon and

38:21

I said I'll let you know the joke is

38:25

what came first the chicken or the egg

38:28

for today's dad joke did you hear about

38:32

the kidnapping at

38:33

school he's fine he just woke up

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.