TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The differences between lumped port and wave port in HFSS

5m 38s638 words103 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

[Music]

0:00

in this video in order to show the

0:04

difference between lampsport and wave 4

0:07

and migration passion antenna is excited

0:11

by both these excitations therefore we

0:15

compare these two excitations and

0:18

express their characterization

0:21

here we use driving mode of solution

0:24

type however for such a structure we

0:28

could use derive and terminal since

0:30

there is a specific ground reference in

0:33

this case

0:35

in the first step we excite the

0:37

structure using waveform since such

0:40

excitation must place outside the

0:44

structure and exactly where the energy

0:47

enters the structure the solution space

0:51

is considered as this the dimension of

0:55

the waveform should be considered as it

0:58

includes all of the energy and also a

1:02

scattered fills out of the structure to

1:06

increase the accuracy

1:09

by right click on the sheet and

1:12

selecting I find excitation we can

1:15

choose waveform and then this page would

1:19

be opened

1:21

in the next page we can specify the

1:24

number of modes

1:26

here we have only one dominant mode of

1:30

GM 0 1 0. so we let the number of modes

1:35

equal to one then in the integration

1:38

line we have specified the direction of

1:41

the field using a line

1:44

this line actually is a calibrating line

1:47

and it is required to make voltage

1:51

calculation

1:53

in the next page by activating the embed

1:56

option

1:57

we can change the refresh plane and this

2:02

option is

2:04

so useful to remove the effect of the

2:07

phase difference created by transmission

2:09

lines therefore in such a structures

2:13

waveform is more accurate than long spot

2:20

here we put the reference plane in where

2:25

the wave enters to patch then by

2:29

pressing finish the way for definition

2:32

is completed note that since in way for

2:36

the impedance of the port is not

2:38

specified

2:40

within this excitation comma and

2:43

impedance parameters can be calculated

2:47

in addition to f y and z parameters

2:51

in the second F tab the structure is

2:55

excited by lampspot despite of the

2:58

waveform loved Port can place inside the

3:02

structure therefore the solution of

3:05

space can be considered as this

3:08

in this case we should consider an

3:11

excitation plane between the conductors

3:15

and in the width of the micro acidic

3:18

line note that this excitation is not

3:21

suitable for a fracture which are filled

3:25

by more than one material and the

3:29

structure such as shown here which have

3:32

a discontinuity no do I find the long

3:35

spot we do right click on the sheet and

3:39

select I find excitation and then launch

3:42

photo

3:43

this page would be opened as it is seen

3:46

here in this case we should specify the

3:50

port impedance and reactance therefore

3:53

using this excitation on the f y and

3:58

that parameter could be calculated

4:01

and the parameter such as impedance and

4:05

comma cannot be computed we put

4:08

impedance equal to 50 and then press

4:12

next as it is seen in the next page

4:15

using lamps Port only one mod can be

4:19

computed by clicking in the integration

4:22

line the direction of the field can be

4:26

specified then press next for this

4:29

excitation the option of the embed is

4:33

the active therefore this excitation is

4:37

suitable for Junctions or the structures

4:40

in which the excitation should be played

4:43

inside the structure no we compare the

4:46

simulation results with each other as it

4:50

is seen there's parameters of these

4:52

metals have a little shift with each

4:55

other

4:56

actually the fields in a microstrip line

5:00

are as shown in this figure and wave 4

5:05

can figure out the fields more accurate

5:08

than long port in which the excitation

5:11

is considered as the figure this

5:14

difference revolves in the obvious

5:17

frequency shift moreover the

5:20

two-dimensional and three-dimensional

5:22

pattern achieved by the excitation have

5:26

a little difference as shown in this

5:28

figure I hope you to like this video

5:31

please subscribe me for more thank you

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.