⚠️ Some features may be temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing 3rd party provider issue. We apologize for the inconvenience and expect this to be resolved soon.
TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The War in Ukraine vs Russia | Prepare for THIS *End.*

18m 53s3,400 words526 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

what is going to happen in ukraine what

0:03

are the potential outcomes and what is

0:05

likely to happen in terms of timing and

0:08

markets in reaction to these outcomes

0:10

well in this video we're going to talk

0:12

about exactly that first a shout out to

0:14

the financial times so for coming up

0:16

with the five scenarios of what could

0:18

potentially happen in terms of a

0:20

resolution in ukraine and of course with

0:23

russia and then i'll be adding details

0:25

on my perspectives for time frames and

0:28

of course what the implications might be

0:30

for markets so let's get right into

0:32

these five scenarios the first scenario

0:34

is a russian win and zielinski uh

0:37

getting toppled that is the zelinski

0:39

government failing the zielinski

0:42

government collapsing zelensky dying or

0:44

being captured some form of of terrible

0:47

outcome now this scenario does have a

0:50

certain likelihood of happening because

0:52

of russia's military might though as

0:54

long as we can keep supplying weapons as

0:56

western allies are to ukrainians it's

0:58

being it's become very difficult for

1:01

russia to actually continue to mount

1:02

their offensive in a successful manner

1:04

they severely underestimated the resolve

1:07

of ukrainians and the power of zelensky

1:09

either way in the scenario if russia

1:12

were to win they would likely install a

1:14

pro-moscow government a puppet

1:16

government the problem with this is it

1:18

would likely lead to an insurgency in

1:21

ukraine similar to what we had seen in

1:24

iraq and afghanistan now the issue here

1:27

is russia would have to occupy and the

1:30

problem is and we've known this from

1:32

prior research russia does not have

1:34

enough troops to occupy when we occupied

1:38

for example iraq during operation iraqi

1:41

freedom

1:42

we invaded with approximately 19 troops

1:45

per thousand civilians

1:47

when germany invaded poland during world

1:50

war ii they invaded with approximately

1:52

80 soldiers per 1000 civilians this is

1:55

why it was a blitzkrieg it was an

1:57

overwhelming amount of soldiers when you

2:00

see nato enter a combat you also usually

2:03

see somewhere between 17 to 20 troops

2:06

per

2:07

civilians

2:09

russia right now is in ukraine with only

2:12

six soldiers per thousand civilians this

2:16

is likely to lead to a very prolonged

2:18

insurgency in a very very weak moscow

2:21

government

2:22

this is not in my opinion going to work

2:24

very well not only are we going to see a

2:27

russian economy continue to falter under

2:30

the pressure of being kicked out of the

2:32

swift system before there's really an

2:33

alternate for the swift banking system

2:35

we're going to continue to see supply

2:37

issues as it relates to manufacturing

2:40

components for let's say as

2:42

even just russian vehicles imagine this

2:44

you want to buy a car but unfortunately

2:46

one-third of parts that go into russian

2:49

vehicles come from outside of russia

2:52

russia is either going to have to source

2:53

these all from china potentially sources

2:56

them from other countries or likely does

2:57

as well or russia is just not going to

2:59

be able to produce as many cars and this

3:01

is why we've seen 20 percent inflation

3:04

in car prices in russia in just the last

3:06

two weeks

3:07

in my opinion this scenario that is a

3:09

pro-moscow government in ukraine is

3:12

going to continue to be bad for markets

3:14

we're going to have a lack of control

3:15

for wheat for neon for palladium this is

3:19

going to be bad for oil prices well i do

3:21

think the pa the the shock pain that is

3:24

the 130 to 150 price per barrel will

3:27

wane will likely stay at elevated oil

3:30

prices for a while say 90 to 110 dollars

3:33

per barrel so we'll see some reprieve

3:35

here but we'll likely see more of the

3:37

same in that big uncertainties will be

3:40

gone the uncertainty of a war with nato

3:43

and a nuclear battle might be gone which

3:45

is very very good we don't want to go in

3:47

that direction which is one of the

3:48

scenarios we'll talk about so this

3:50

scenario will be better for markets but

3:52

it won't be great because we still won't

3:55

have a resolution we'll have a power

3:58

vacuum in ukraine while

4:01

russia attempts to install their power

4:03

structure which ukrainians are unlikely

4:05

to respect again leading to prolonged

4:08

insurgency a lot of death and a lot of

4:10

continued destruction now this will of

4:12

course be a very localized issue but it

4:15

doesn't matter if wheat fields burn down

4:18

in ukraine

4:19

and 30 percent of the world's wheat

4:21

comes from the ukraine russia region

4:24

wheat prices are going up baguettes in

4:26

france are going to be more expensive

4:27

and inflation will continue to rage or

4:29

rain havoc or wreak havoc whatever

4:32

create havoc throughout the world

4:33

unfortunately so this is not one of the

4:35

best case scenarios though it is

4:38

definitely not as bad as a full-on war

4:40

with nato that would be the absolute

4:42

worst case scenario so little reprieve

4:45

but probably more of the same in this

4:47

scenario

4:48

now another option would be a little bit

4:50

of mix here a partial russian victory

4:53

where basically zelensky's government

4:55

goes bankrupt

4:56

maybe they end up tr retreating to

4:58

western ukraine let's say they make leve

5:00

the capital which given that russia

5:03

right now has been

5:04

mostly focused at least as the financial

5:06

times puts it uh they've mostly focused

5:08

their assault on the eastern front in

5:11

addition to kiev and odessa in the south

5:13

they've mostly focused their bombardment

5:15

like marupo

5:17

and kharkiv over on the eastern front

5:20

maybe this is an indication that russia

5:22

is okay with a partitioned ukraine where

5:25

essentially you draw a line down the

5:27

middle russia potentially ends up taking

5:29

odessa the seaport third largest city

5:31

and kiev the capital as well as eastern

5:34

territories but ukraine exists as sort

5:36

of now a 40 percent of what it used to

5:38

be country with a capital in la viv

5:41

where we've really had almost

5:43

no assaults on western territories

5:46

now

5:46

one argument is that that's what russia

5:48

is trying to carve out another argument

5:50

is russia's coming from the north the

5:52

south and the east and they just haven't

5:54

made it all the way to the west side yet

5:56

who knows but putin has hinted at a

5:59

partitioned ukraine so this does mean

6:02

there is some likelihood that this could

6:04

potentially happen now in this case we

6:07

might end up seeing less of an

6:09

insurgency because ukrainians who are

6:11

still remaining in ukraine it could

6:14

potentially potentially not no

6:15

guarantees here

6:16

choose to move to western ukraine the

6:18

problem with that is that means giving

6:20

up their land their property their their

6:23

belongings uh their their cities their

6:25

businesses in eastern ukraine or central

6:28

to eastern ukraine now that could be

6:31

likely though because a lot of that

6:33

property could be destroyed or just

6:35

under russian control which creates very

6:38

difficult opportunities to re-establish

6:40

normal life uh in sort of the eastern

6:42

bloc it's almost kind of like we might

6:44

sort of see the division that we saw in

6:46

germany west germany versus in east

6:49

germany although i doubt there would be

6:51

a wall unless russia pays for it now

6:54

another option well i suppose i should

6:56

briefly mention economically

6:59

economically this scenario here is

7:01

probably better than a complete russian

7:03

win because there is a potential that

7:06

some of this will be seen as somewhat

7:07

negotiated and if ukraine says you know

7:10

what we're good with this we're good

7:12

which which is unlikely at this point

7:13

but it's possible

7:15

if we're good with this

7:16

go ahead you know lift some of the pain

7:18

on russia ultimately that's going to

7:20

come down to negotiation with

7:22

negotiations between ukraine and and the

7:24

western world and maybe we could see

7:26

some sanctions lifted we could actually

7:28

see a likelihood of more relaxation in

7:30

markets than in scenario number one

7:32

remember scenario number one is no more

7:34

ukraine like russia completely takes it

7:36

scenario number two is partitioned i

7:38

would say scenario number two is

7:39

significantly better for markets than

7:41

scenario number one of course this is

7:43

still a bad scenario for ukraine it's

7:46

giving up a lot of land a lot of power

7:48

but it could be what putin's going for

7:50

because remember what putin wants is a

7:52

demilitarized ukraine now this is

7:55

important because as a condition of

7:58

joining nato you actually have to prove

8:02

that you could provide military support

8:04

here's the criteria in the words of nato

8:07

the criteria i'll put it up on screen as

8:09

well it says these criteria include a

8:11

functioning democratic political system

8:13

based on a market economy fair treatment

8:15

of minority populations a commitment to

8:18

resolve conflicts peacefully an ability

8:20

and willingness to make military

8:22

contributions to nato operations and a

8:24

commitment to a democratic civil

8:27

military relationship uh and uh and

8:29

institutions as well so here you can see

8:32

if ukraine has no military then they're

8:34

unable to make military contributions to

8:36

nato which would actually disqualify

8:38

them from joining nato solely from that

8:41

point this is one of the reasons that

8:42

putin wants to see demilitarized ukraine

8:45

and this is why it's likely that putin's

8:47

not going to give up his fight for the

8:49

capital kiev and again this is where you

8:51

could potentially see a new capital move

8:54

westward in the scenario

8:55

but again we'll also have insurgency in

8:58

the east so we'll still have anxieties

9:00

in the east

9:01

okay now scenario number three

9:04

this is probably the best case scenario

9:07

and this is a negotiated solution so

9:11

bloomberg this morning has been talking

9:12

about

9:13

the constant airing of quote continuous

9:16

talks with russia over video and zoom

9:18

calls this is very good the more talks

9:20

we have the better better the prior

9:22

three discussions so far are focused

9:24

predominantly on ceasefire negotiations

9:26

and humanitarian corridors which have

9:28

really collapsed every time even under

9:30

the management of the red cross mostly

9:32

because russian troops or ukrainian

9:34

troops somebody ends up firing either

9:36

through mistrust or fear or lack of

9:38

communication or whatever and the

9:40

corridors fall apart

9:42

now of course you do have some levels of

9:44

escalation here for example

9:46

you have sergey lavrov suggesting that

9:49

the us is providing biological weapons

9:51

to ukraine and at the same time you have

9:54

joe biden saying any use of chemical

9:57

weapons will be met with a quote severe

10:01

price now if obama before biden is any

10:05

clue here then putin probably doesn't

10:08

care about biden's words because

10:10

remember obama said if chemical weapons

10:12

were used and during his term in the

10:15

middle east then that would be a red

10:18

line remember syria damascus and the use

10:21

of potentially mustard gas which

10:23

ultimately came out to be yeah mustard

10:25

gas was used while obama's red line was

10:28

crossed and nothing happened this is of

10:30

course one of the stains on obama's

10:32

presidency and and i don't mean to just

10:33

only say that as if i'm anti-obama or

10:36

for obama it's just an observation this

10:38

is one of one of i'm picking one of the

10:39

downsides but only because it relates to

10:41

what biden is saying here this is not a

10:43

video about obama anyway obviously we

10:46

know that kiev so far is ready for a

10:48

diplomatic solution we have heard from

10:50

zielinski that he is interested in

10:52

talking to putin directly and believes

10:54

by talking to putin directly he could

10:55

end this war we have heard zalenski say

10:58

that he is no longer interested in

10:59

joining nato probably would extend that

11:02

to not wanting to join the eu as well uh

11:04

so

11:05

with a negotiated solution here it is

11:07

possible that ukrainians would say look

11:09

we've negotiated a solution let's loosen

11:11

some of the sanctions let's get russia

11:13

back into swift now we can potentially

11:15

reduce the odds of a great depression in

11:18

russia since russian the russian economy

11:20

is getting absolutely destroyed uh so

11:22

obviously is the ukrainian economy and

11:24

the global economy is suffering global

11:25

gdp is suffering here but this

11:27

negotiated end would probably be the

11:28

best case scenario for markets i would

11:30

expect

11:31

if oil starts flowing again russian oil

11:33

starts flowing again we could see a

11:34

reduction in inflationary fears

11:36

transitory the new sort of transitory

11:38

type of inflation would prove to be true

11:40

and we would see a relaxation in markets

11:42

and and probably a broader rally so best

11:44

case scenario for markets here would be

11:46

a negotiated solution despite the fact

11:48

that there continue to be aggressions on

11:50

both sides uh for example

11:52

there's a report that apparently from

11:54

ukrainian airspace fighter jets launched

11:56

onto lunch missiles onto a belarusian

11:59

town and it appears to be that the goal

12:01

of this is trying to essentially aggro

12:03

using a video gaming term here the

12:04

belarusian military into combat in

12:07

ukraine to fight alongside the russians

12:09

against ukrainians because now the

12:11

belarusians are being dragged into this

12:13

war which they've previously suggested

12:15

they might consider moving into ukraine

12:17

with russia so

12:18

who knows maybe is that something that's

12:20

going to tip them over the edge nobody

12:22

knows okay now the next scenario uh this

12:25

is scenario number four is that putin

12:28

ends up getting

12:30

defeated somehow

12:31

so uh putin could get defeated in a few

12:33

different ways so first of all if allies

12:35

continue to provide weapons stinger

12:36

missiles javelins you name it it's

12:38

possible that russian troops could end

12:39

up getting repelled long enough for

12:41

elites and kremlin to in the kremlin

12:43

rather to essentially overthrow putin

12:46

you could have a military coup so elites

12:49

in the kremlin this would be like the

12:50

politicians the oligarchs saying putin

12:53

you got to go let's get you an island

12:55

let's get you a napoleon bonaparte kind

12:57

of style home and let's get you out of

12:58

here okay you gotta go go retire and

13:01

disappear okay that that would be an

13:03

elite kind of style takeover right and

13:05

then a relaxation hopefully uh the

13:07

russian military could potentially take

13:08

over out of frustration over the the

13:11

disastrous casualties and failures in

13:13

ukraine uh especially as if a lot of

13:16

them felt lied to about them just

13:18

going to ukraine or the border for

13:20

military exercises and now they're

13:22

on the front lines of a special military

13:25

operation aka war

13:27

russian military could end up

13:28

overthrowing uh putin this would be a

13:30

military coup a coup d'etat and this

13:32

would be replacing the kremlin's

13:34

government with military power now

13:37

likely the only reason this would happen

13:38

is if the military wanted to withdraw

13:40

from ukraine and and the war otherwise

13:43

they would just keep going on the same

13:44

side as putin so that would be good news

13:46

as well

13:47

obviously it's potent there's this

13:49

potential of the citizens revolting but

13:51

it's a lot harder for the citizens to

13:52

revoke when the state controls the media

13:55

so this might be a little bit more

13:56

difficult or more

13:58

challenging as a method of overthrowing

14:00

putin but either way putin could also

14:02

you know happen to drink nuclear tea as

14:04

kevin o'leary suggests from shark tank

14:06

or you know somehow end up disappearing

14:08

this is probably going to be a second

14:11

best case scenario here negotiated

14:13

solution being the best because then we

14:15

would be certain of the outcomes the

14:17

second best case scenario is if putin

14:19

for whatever reason was overthrown or

14:20

disappeared

14:21

then the reason this would be likely a

14:23

best-case scenario because likely

14:25

whoever's overthrowing putin doesn't

14:27

agree with putin's war and then wants to

14:29

end the war but we're not as certain as

14:31

that of that as a potential negotiated

14:33

solution right uh now you also if if you

14:36

do have a putin government collapsing

14:38

and let's say russia becomes almost

14:40

somewhat of a a demoted state i don't

14:43

want to say failed state but they would

14:44

certainly lose a lot of power it's

14:45

possible that you would create a power

14:47

vacuum in in russia and if there's a

14:49

power vacuum in russia it wouldn't

14:51

actually surprise me to see

14:52

western like western allies and nato try

14:55

to actually

14:57

move towards russia to try to

14:59

establish aid in russia that could be

15:01

humanitarian aid because of the

15:02

depression banking aid

15:04

food aid whatever aid in in the western

15:07

regions of russia

15:09

and it's also possible that at the same

15:10

time because there's no way china is

15:12

going to allow western nations getting

15:13

into russia it's also possible that you

15:15

could see chinese influence coming in on

15:17

the eastern side of russia to sort of

15:19

aid and rebuild what's you know the

15:21

russian economy obviously this would

15:23

also include a lot of aid in humanity

15:25

you know rebuilding efforts in ukraine

15:26

but also

15:28

considering the russian economy has been

15:29

devastated they'll likely be some form

15:31

of power struggle uh in russia and this

15:34

would lead to a lot of uncertainty in

15:37

russia this obviously again assumes that

15:40

ukraine gets a lot of help uh the

15:42

ukrainian government's gonna have to get

15:43

rebuilt right uh but zielinski would

15:46

likely rebuild ukraine because in this

15:48

case scenario russia lost right so

15:50

zalenski would likely rebuild ukraine

15:52

with the help of western nations and

15:53

western allies and then you'd have some

15:55

interesting power dynamics in

15:58

russia remember the goal generally of

16:00

countries is to create or become

16:02

regional hegemons so a regional hegemon

16:05

is basically a power that ends up having

16:06

cultural political military and economic

16:09

might in a region

16:11

okay next uh this is the absolute worst

16:14

case scenario this is scenario number

16:16

five scenario number five terrible

16:17

scenario this would be

16:19

a war with nato that is this war in

16:21

ukraine spills over to poland or another

16:24

nato country latvia whatever

16:27

and uh we we end up dragging the

16:29

european union the united states nato

16:32

into a disaster with uh with with russia

16:34

this could potentially have nuclear

16:36

implications

16:37

this is a i would say the the least

16:40

likely scenario but uh it is one that is

16:42

creating a lot of fear so any other

16:44

scenario that eliminates the potential

16:47

for ukrainian war i'm sorry a war with

16:49

nato would be very positive i believe

16:51

for markets removing that sort of

16:54

nuclear threat uh from market so

16:57

these are the five scenarios here and i

16:58

gotta again shout out financial the

17:00

financial times here for the inspiration

17:02

on this of course i've added a lot of uh

17:04

information and research and content to

17:06

this but i want to ask you what do you

17:08

think what is the most likely scenario

17:10

remember we've got five five scenarios

17:13

here and so maybe in the comments down

17:14

below let me know scenario number one

17:16

russia wins zielinski's toppled

17:19

number two partial russian victory and

17:22

the silencing government goes bankrupt

17:24

number three negotiated end no overall

17:27

control

17:28

uh putin toppled is number four with a

17:30

russian retreat that's number four and

17:31

then a war with nato number five what

17:34

scenario do you think is likely or maybe

17:36

what odds of each would you say

17:38

personally if i had to pick i would say

17:40

the odds of a negotiated end are

17:42

probably the highest

17:44

likely shot here i'd say this is

17:46

probably about a 60 chance of happening

17:48

i think a uh war with nato is probably

17:51

in the direction of two percent

17:53

so very very low let's see that leaves

17:55

me about 38 to give up

17:58

uh the next scenario i would say would

17:59

probably be about twenty percent for a

18:00

partial russian victory and uh zielinski

18:03

moving westward that uh that brings us

18:05

to about

18:07

82 percent so now we've got about 18

18:09

percent left

18:11

i would say probably the next maybe

18:13

14 percent would be a russian win and

18:16

zielinski getting toppled and the left

18:17

over four percent there being putin

18:19

getting overthrown so you can see i

18:21

think the nato war chances are on 2

18:24

putin getting toppled around 4 very very

18:26

low chance there negotiated end or sort

18:29

of that east west ukraine in my opinion

18:31

probably most likely

18:33

of course negotiated and being the best

18:34

case scenario for markets which i

18:36

believe is the most likely i just hope

18:38

and pray that this happens sooner rather

18:40

than later to help prevent and limit

18:43

the loss of civilian lives and just

18:44

lives in general anyway thanks so much

18:46

for watching if you found this helpful

18:47

consider sharing the video and folks

18:48

we'll see in the next one bye

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.