Congress JUST Destroyed Fauci on Covid | Was Elon Musk Right

Mr fauci oh boy he has been the topic of

a lot a lot of political attacks and

political support and when people say

he's just the person who tried to do the

best with the information he had

available on the other hand you have

people like Elon Musk saying prosecute

fauci he lied to Congress and the truth

is probably somewhere in the middle but

today we've got to look at what the heck

is this proximal origin paper that we

just got some more insight on from

Congress let's talk about that because

it's a little eyebrow raising about what

maybe goes on behind the scenes at our

government and how potentially the media

narratives get rigged in favor of

whatever the government wants and I know

I know there are 50 of you already

punching your fists in the air going

come on Kevin you didn't already know

that

oh no I did but anyway let me give you a

quick little background thank you so

first it's really important to remember

what what gain of function is and how

that compares to directed Evolution and

I'm going to give very Elementary

example I'm not a biologist or or

whoever would work on this kind of stuff

I'm just going to do my best for you

okay so my understanding is if you have

a virus that can only infect bats then

it has not the function of infecting

humans now if you genetically engineer

it you take some you know Snippets of

DNA and you insert it into that virus

and you're like here protein fold some

kind of receptacle or whatever that can

now land on a human and make them sick

that would be genetic engineering gain a

function style research where basically

you have genetically made a virus do

something that it could not otherwise do

okay that's on one hand gain a function

research on the other hand there's this

thing called directed Evolution and and

the theory here is that rather than

taking DNA and trying to screw with the

stuff you're basically trying to let

nature do that on its own but you're

doing that in like a rapid and

successive manner to kind of get what

you want

naturally quote unquote naturally so

here's an example let's say you take a

naturally occurring coronavirus that

only infects monkeys and not humans and

then you infect five monkeys with him

now which of the monkeys is the sickest

which has the strongest form of the

virus potentially okay take that monkey

and make it infect five more repeat this

experiment a hundred times now you're

left a hundred times down that row with

the sickest compounded with the sickest

compound with the sickest compounded

with the sickest a hundred times

as an example here now you have

something that's probably pretty damn

hellish

and that potentially could be covet 19.

see that is an example of how directed

Evolution could give you something

that's really really deadly uh that

compared to something that was

originally benign now let's now so now

you have a little bit of background on

sort of the difference of of when data

function is talked about and directed

Evolution has talked about now we got to

look at what's going on with this March

of 2020 paper and what does it have to

do with a paper that just came out three

years later in March of

2023. so this is interesting so we know

that the FBI the department of energy

and other departments with virologists I

honestly I don't know why virologists

work at the department of energy or the

FBI I still haven't figured that out but

there's a reason you have these

departments saying yeah it's looking

we've got some confidence that uh kovid

came from a lab right the lab leak

Theory right uh and this is a concern

because the Wuhan Institute of virology

which is known for this type of research

this gain of function directed Evolution

style research is described as China's

first biohazard a level four research

facility and the paper is very important

that we're about to look at because it

basically poo-poos the idea that

covet came from a lab now the paper that

K that that basically pooped with the

idea is this right here

this paper is called the proximal origin

of covet 19. now what's really

interesting about this paper is that

this paper ended up getting cited over 2

300 times in different mainstream media

articles and videos now that's a really

big deal because that basically means

the government put together this paper

and then the media ran with it

and when the media runs with it they're

basically just perpetuating what this

paper says without doing any more

digging into it right now that's really

important and so what does this paper

say well specifically it says the

following

it is improbable that covid-19 emerged

through laboratory manipulation of

coronaviruses

genetic data irrefutably shows that SARS

covid-19 whatever is not derived from

any previously used virus backbone so

they're basically trying to poo poo the

idea that this came from a lab that this

likely either came from an animal Source

or human to human Transmission in in

sort of a you know a natural way right

this is the natural transmission

argument and it even Ends by reiterating

since we observed all covid a known

coronavirus features including blah blah

blah blah as it relates to coronaviruses

in nature we do not believe in any type

of laboratory-based scenario but wait a

minute

remember what I just described about

directed Evolution where you kind of

take a natural uh a covid and then maybe

you infect monkeys a hundred different

times Well if you remember high school

biology this coronavirus that you

directedly evoluted boy I probably

butchered that but whatever is going to

have some genetic markers that are

similar to the ones from nature

you've really accelerated that process

100x and that's not natural right by

taking the constant constantly taking

the sickest monkey and affecting the

next sickest monkey is not natural

because in nature it's entirely possible

that a stronger form of the virus would

just end up dying out in nature

naturally because it has some sort of a

weakness that wouldn't otherwise be

exposed in a laboratory where you could

actually preserve a virus that's not

supposed to exist anymore okay so you

have this paper that the media runs with

from March of 2020 promoting that no no

no no lab leak Theory okay so we have

this but what did we just get well we

just got a report

from the Congressional subcommittee on

the origins of the coronavirus and in

their report in their memo released on

Friday what did they say well they said

the following they said that fauci who

knew uh the National Institute of Health

had contributed funding to the Wuhan

Institute of virology this Congressional

report or memo says that the evidence

available to the select subcommittee

suggests that fauci prompted the

researchers to write the proximal origin

paper and the goal was

disprove the lab leak Theory

that's not good let me make that really

clear what that means okay what that

means is uh our government our

government

knew they funded the Wuhan Institute uh

to some extent right so to some extent

our government knew they funded the

Wuhan Institute of virology okay uh

fauci uh was told this and I believe it

was around uh around Jan 27 2020. I

don't know exactly which date in the 20s

but it was somewhere around here so our

government knew this

then they decided in March of to 2020

let's circulate a brief that disproves

the lab League Theory uh and then

therefore the the sort of implied

conclusion and I'm saying implied here

right because we're guessing but the

implied conclusion here is

our government would be really

embarrassed if they

uh had to take any blame for covet much

easier to blame China

kind of interesting right so what is

what is that the rest of that

Congressional junk say well first of all

they say that evidence available to

Congress

suggests that fauci prompted this paper

to disprove any lab League Theory now

notice it's not uh research to disprove

the lab leak Theory it's a paper to

disprove the lab leak Theory now it'd be

one thing if it's like hey look go to

China and see if we can disprove the lab

League Theory and if we can't then we

can't right it's a paper however to

disprove the lab leak Theory uh and then

over here you have look at this the goal

of the proximal origin paper was to

disprove a lab leak Theory Dr Anderson

had objectively weighed all the evidence

available to him and uh scientists must

make conclusions available by all

evidence whatever whatever a lot of

scientists quietly and privately

apparently on phone calls stated hey

like what if it's a lab League Theory

but then according to emails even Dr

Anderson stated our main work over the

last couple weeks has been focused on

trying to disprove any type of lab leak

Theory the email directly contradicts

Scripps earlier statement that Dr

Anderson objectively weighed all

evidence related to covet instead it

appears Anderson was given Direction and

sought to formulate a paper regardless

of the available available evidence that

would disprove a lab leak

this is from Congress

so then you get a little bit of talk

about how uh well here's some more

quotes here uh Dr Farah led the drafting

process and made at least one uncredited

direct edit to the proximal origin uh

this individual is not credited as

having any involvement in proximal

origin however according to New Evidence

he led the drafting process and in fact

made several direct edits apparently

right before publication emails reveal

that Dr afara uh was thanked for editing

the document thank you for shepherding

this paper listen to this rumors of

bioweapaneering are now circulating in

China Dr Faro responds and says

confirming that he will be pressuring

nature which is a publication for for

science uh and we'll be pressuring

nature to publish this letter

I will push nature in addition to

Leading the drafting publication process

Dr Farah made at least one direct edit

to proximal origin and here it is sorry

to micromanage micro edit but would you

be willing to change one sentence from

it is unlikely kovid emerged from uh

through laboratory manipulation too it

is improbable that covet emerged from a

Lab look at this so you have somebody

who gets no credits in the writing of

proximal origin yet is making these

media directives to make the media

basically suck on the the government's

you know what to say nope nope lab leak

is not true lab leak is not true you

could Google this yourself it pops up

it's the first search result so you can

find this yourself uh if you just type

into Google this select subcommittee on

coronavirus pandemic members 3 5 20 23.

it's the first link right there so you

can see it yourself look at it yourself

anyway thank you so much for being here

I gotta go to course member live stream

stream right now goodbye see you all

next time bye hey thanks so much for

watching and subscribing as well as

sharing the videos in case you've

enjoyed it make sure to consider getting

more perspective via the links Down

Below in becoming a millionaire through

real estate investing is one of our most

popular courses zero to millionaire real

estate investing that is often bundled

with the stocks and psychology of money

group or the do-it-yourself property

management and Rental Renovations guide

after that you can also check out the

elite Hustlers which has its own special

exclusive live stream for people looking

to make more money as an individual

earner or that is as an entrepreneur or

as an employee and of course a check out

the other programs specifically for

agents or YouTube content creators