My First Live Debate for Governor [Full Video].
FULL TRANSCRIPT
[Music]
now the issues facing california
homelessness the economy serious climate
change challenges the candidates
the politicians are mucking it up this
crisis exceeds the current governor's
ability to deal with it we shouldn't
have career politicians in politics i
think the most important job of our next
governor is to make it less important
who the governor is tonight information
voters across california need to make
informed decisions
live from california's capitol
kcra and the san francisco chronicle
present the california recall debate
good evening and welcome i'm gulstan
dart right now voters across california
are deciding two questions first should
governor gavin newsom be recalled and
second if he is recalled who should
replace him which is why we are here
tonight we invited governor newsom and
six leading candidates looking to
replace him the governor's campaign said
that he's not taking part in debates
larry elder and caitlyn jenner said that
they will only debate the governor
tonight we're joined by four candidates
who did accept kevin kiley is a
republican he graduated valedictorian
from granite bay high school he's
currently a member of the state assembly
representing the sixth district kevin
paffreth is a democrat he appears on the
ballot as a financial educator analyst
and he may be better known by his
youtube channel meet kevin he has also
worked as a real estate broker kevin
faulconer is a republican he appears on
the ballot as a businessman and an
educator he's a former city council
member and mayor of san diego and john
cox is a republican he appears on the
ballot as a businessman accountant and
father he ran for governor in 2018 and
lost to gavin newsom
those are the candidates now to the
questions and we want to hear from you
so scan the qr code you see on your
screen to send us questions for the
candidates our moderators tonight are
alexi kossef san francisco chronicle
capital correspondent and kcra 3's
deirdre fitzpatrick and based on a
random drawing our first question goes
to kevin faulconer deirdre all right
gulstan thank you so by agreement you
gentlemen have agreed to have one minute
to answer these questions and for our
viewers at home they will know that
their minute is up because on the floor
which you cannot see is a red light
green light system so when the light is
green you're free to talk you'll see a
yellow which means start wrapping it up
when you get to red you're supposed to
be done talking and if you get past that
lexi and i
will find a nice way to try to start
cutting you off so let's get to our
first questions we did ask people all
over california to submit questions we
had well over 400 questions come in we
won't ask all of them
no surprise one of the top things people
want to talk about is something that
affects every single person on the
planet everybody in this room right now
and that is coronavirus so we'll talk
about the pandemic and vaccine mandates
to start us off today so this week the
fda gave full authorization to the
pfizer vaccine for those who are 16 and
older so now that it's no longer under
the emergency use status authorization
what is your position on vaccine
mandates both in the private sector and
in the public sector and it is worth
pointing out that all four of our
candidates tonight are vaccinated so we
will as gulstan said start with kevin
faulconer i said thank you i am vaccine
that vaccine number one way that we can
get over covet 19 is to have
everyone get the vaccine as i said my
family's vaccinated my wife my kids
i think it's incredibly important and
particularly in this now that we're
seeing fda approval
that we continue to educate and educate
the benefits of getting that vaccine and
that's something that i've been strongly
advocating for
all of these many months ever since
obviously the vaccines came out
and i feel really strongly that our best
opportunity is indeed to educate we're
not going to mandate our way out of
covent 19. while i was mayor of san
diego i really stood up against you know
the statewide mandates that we saw from
governor newsom one size fits all policy
we want everybody to be healthy we want
everybody to be safe but the best way to
do that is to educate folks to get that
vaccine and that is the best way that we
are all going to get over this together
as californians so to be clear you're
against mandates both in the pub for the
public and then also the private sector
as well no man our best opportunity
again is to get everybody vaccinated
we're not going to do it by mandating
you need to educate okay next up is
kevin paffrost same question thank you
very much
albert einstein once said the definition
of insanity is doing the same thing and
expecting different results the reality
is
the vaccine is very important however
oxford university just told us last week
that transmission still occurs in
vaccinated individuals now i encourage
everyone to get vaccinated my family is
vaccinated but my three and
five-year-old are not because they can't
yet get the vaccine and so we need to do
something different if we want to end
this pandemic
we need to also include an emphasis on
hepa filtration in our schools there's a
reason our planes are still flying we
don't need lockdowns to end this
pandemic what we need is proper
education like mr faulkner has said
potentially even incentives of up to 250
for a new
vaccinated adult but if we still spread
coven from vaccinated individuals we
must also make sure we lessen the burden
on our hospitals by ensuring that every
building in our state has a proper hepa
filtration and we use proper masking to
end this pandemic okay so i'm gonna ask
the same follow-up question just to be
clear
no mandates private sector or public
sector i do agree with mandates i agree
with mandates at a local level though
not from the governor's office i'm gonna
be very clear about this i believe every
individual business has the
constitutional right and every
individual building has the right to
determine their own mandate rules that
means every individual school hospital
can determine vaccine mandates
themselves thank you kevin kiley your
turn
well as i was uh watching your station
kcra before the debate started i saw a
commercial from gavin newsom against the
recall and he had this dire warning that
if the recall succeeds then these
mandates are going to go away and
cobit's going to spread which is kind of
an odd thing to say because the mandates
didn't exist until a week or two ago
we're the only state that has them and
they haven't even gone into effect yet
so it's clearly a campaign issue and
that's the way that gavin newsom has
treated kovitt from the beginning he's
politicized it i'll give you a very
clear example of that
last year in october when newsome
thought it was good politics he cast
doubt on the vaccine he said that we
couldn't take the fda's word for whether
it was safe the chair of the united
states senate health committee had to
write him a letter telling him to cut it
out he said that newsome was attacking
the career scientist at the fda that he
was discouraging americans from taking
the vaccine and he was costing lives and
then when it came time to actually roll
out the vaccine we had the slowest
rollout of any say the governor didn't
prioritize seniors and when they were
did become eligible they'd spend all day
on the phone trying to get an
appointment and couldn't get one it's
been exactly the opposite of the way the
approach should have been and john cox
i agree with mr kiley i won't call him
kevin because we have too many cabins
here
but
listen the the politicians will
politicize this and that's what they've
done and i'm a businessman i want to
solve the problem and mandates aren't
going to solve the problem uh i've been
vaccinated my family's been vaccinated i
believe in the vaccine it comes from the
private sector it's well tested and i
believe it's good i'd like to see the
vaccine approved not only for adults but
i'd like to see the proof for children
as well and i think that's going to
happen very soon but i think the
reticence of people to get vaccinated is
all about the lack of trust in
government and gavin newsom is exhibit a
in that
situation this not just his hypocritical
dinner at the french laundry which
demonstrated that he doesn't think the
rules apply to him but it's also the
no-bid contracts the no bid contract the
blue cross to botch up the vaccine
distribution that mr kylie referred to
uh the note the raising of money for his
wife's foundation uh from pg e uh which
literally has killed people
this erodes trust and when people don't
have trust in their leadership they
don't listen to leaders when the leaders
tell them that they should do something
i don't believe in mandates i don't
believe in mass mandates i am not
interested in having that i believe in
freedom i believe in the constitution
thank you john cox appreciate let's move
on to the second viewer question
regarding coronavirus several of you
have expressed opposition to mass
mandates in schools as well as other
public health measures that governor
newsom has adopted to combat the
pandemic
now that we're in the middle of another
surge what steps would you take to slow
the spread of the virus moving forward
kevin paffraff we'll start with you
thank you very much well first and
foremost we need better masks facial
coverings are a failure dr scott goblins
tells us that facial coverings
themselves are no better than 20 to 30
percent effective the reality is we need
n95
masking the cdc in government has failed
us in providing science-based evidence
that we should not use these if you go
to the cdc's website right now they say
don't use n95s they should be reserved
for healthcare workers i believe that is
a mistake and as governor i will provide
n95 respirators these masks to
individuals who need them in our state
who cannot afford them i will make sure
we have an appropriate supply of masks
that are well fitted for our children
and the people of our state so with
proper ventilation we can actually end
covet and again i'm for vaccination but
what you just heard from the other three
candidates on the stage and what you
hear from the other candidates who are
too afraid to be here tonight to stand
in front of the california people
is nothing about ventilation and new
ideas it's more of the same and that's
why we're failing with covid i will
change that as government
thank you very much kevin kiley what
steps would you take i would follow the
approach that other states have taken
which is to have a balanced approach and
to place trust in citizens and when you
look at the issue of masks we're in the
minority of states that has a statewide
mandate and you look at other countries
like the united kingdom they've said
we're not going to do mass for
elementary school students or we're not
going to require it because the harms to
a child's development far outweigh any
benefits and those benefits aren't even
very clearly established and it's almost
certainly the case that the effect on a
child of wearing a mask all day varies a
lot from child to child which is why
this should be this decision should be
in the hands of parents but we need to
we're talking about mask right now but
let's not forget the fact that
california shut down its schools longer
than any other state in the country we
were 50th out of 50 in getting our kids
back to school was that because that was
the safe thing to do no gavin newsom
knew it wasn't the safer thing to do he
sent his own kids to in-person private
school it was rather that we have a
special interest in this state the
teachers unions that gives more money to
political uh office holders than any
other group and has given more money to
gavin newsom than anyone and so that's
why i think there's a level of distrust
that exists in a lot of what the
government is doing because clearly
neither public health nor the interest
of our kids has been guiding policy
making so you've spoken for the past
minute about
something you're opposed to which is
mass mandates but what steps would you
take moving forward to slow the spread
of the virus i would rebuild the trust
that gavin newsom has lost through the
steps i've just outlined the way that
he's politicized the vaccine the way
he's politicized things like mass the
way that he shut down our schools for no
good reason i would say i'm going to
start serving the people of california i
think when we rebuild that trust people
are more than able to take the measures
they need thank you thank you very much
john cox what steps would you take well
i agree with rebuilding the trust
people should trust in the vaccine they
don't because they don't trust gavin
newsom they don't trust the politicians
and you know we need to be honest with
people about this disease this is an
awful disease i got it early on
the chinese should certainly be held
accountable for failure to warn us about
it as well as possibly developing it
themselves but we have to deal with it
and that's the problem see the
politicians never consider the costs of
any activity they they engender they
whipped up a whole lot of fear among
people and and certainly this disease is
certainly not a great disease but but
it's 99.9 survivable uh certainly we
should protect the vulnerable certainly
we should protect people with
pre-existing conditions but what we
should do is be honest with people this
disease has animal reservoirs smallpox
didn't we're not going to get rid of
this disease
so we've got to encourage people to
trust the vaccine get the vaccine so if
they do get the disease it's not going
to be as serious and that's the best
that that's the best way so are there
any specific
steps that you had in mind beyond
rebuilding trust with the public again
i'm not i look at the costs you know we
can eliminate all highway deaths if we
all drove at 10 miles an hour well we're
not about to do that
governor newsom shut down small
businesses he shut our kids out of
school
places like florida kept their
businesses open disney world was open in
july thank you disneyland just opened in
april so i you know the destruction of
saint paul's destruction to our
children's psyche is also serious too
thank you for your answer and and kevin
faulconer are there any steps that you
would take moving forward to slow the
spirit of the virus the most important
thing is to let our local school
districts working with parents
make the right decisions based upon the
facts of the ground in that community i
think one of the things that you've
heard very clearly is that gavin newsom
always his first step is to say let's
have a statewide mandate our state's
very big it's very diverse that's the
wrong approach again we need to have
parents school district members working
together
i'll tell you our schools should have
been open this past semester
the fact that this governor shut down
our schools for as long as he did i mean
i kicked off my campaign in los angeles
in front of a closed public school and
right across the street was an open
private school where teachers were
safely teaching and kids were safely
learning why
because that school reported to parents
but yet the public school where i was at
with ultimately reports to gavin newsom
was closed
my daughter should have been in school
this past semester just like everybody
else's kids across california in the
classroom safely learning with great
teachers doing it zoom was no substitute
we had a governor that didn't understand
that we're still dealing with those
consequences now
thank you and just quickly again are
there any specific steps that you would
take to slow the spread of the virus in
california all the great steps that we
have seen we have seen our local
districts with our great teachers
working with our parents in terms of
social distancing in terms of all the
hygiene things that you have to do make
those decisions locally not again a
statewide mandate coming from the
governor to shut our schools down thank
you very much
it is not a surprise we're in a severe
drought and that many of california's
water reservoirs are at record low
levels would you mandate restrictions on
water use to get california through this
season if so how would you actually
enforce them and if not
what would you do to address the very
dry months that we have ahead of us and
we'll start this time with kevin kylie i
would not do so rationing should not be
an option and you mentioned the
reservoirs are low they were overflowing
just a few years ago so if we had
political leaders who were exercising
any semblance of political leadership we
would have figured this out a long time
ago maybe we should find a way to save
the water in the wet years so that we
can use it in the dry years what i've
proposed is a constitutional amendment
that will say that from this point
forward a fixed amount of our state
budget is going to go towards projects
to increase our water supply towards
dams towards reservoirs towards
conveyance to reuse towards desalination
until we add 5 million acre feet to our
annual water supply and by the way there
will be protections from litigation as
well and it would make sure the funding
is actually used for that purpose you
know we haven't significantly expanded
our water capacity here in california
since the state water project we have
more than enough water that comes to us
by the grace of god we just need to
manage it responsibly you know and
scarcity and rationing and cutbacks are
political choices and if we make
different choices then we'll end this
era of shorter showers and fallow fields
in california those are long-term ideas
what do you do for the next six months
until the rain is back well i point you
to for example a letter that a democrat
in the assembly adam gray wrote to the
water board telling them not to impose
these cutbacks on farmers and pointing
to other solutions like a lot of the
environmental regulations that cause us
to divert water from productive use
right john cox
yeah this is another one of the
management problems that the politicians
and the celebrities and the insiders who
have run this state for too long
have cost i mean this is a management
issue this is not a political issue if
you need water which we do we need water
to live we need water to farm we need
water for every use
you make sure that you have the water
available you don't just sit and blame
climate change and not do anything about
it i'm a businessman i'm going to solve
the problem and of course what that
means is that we have to do things like
desalination recycling programs and
reservoirs and i agree right now uh we
are in a problem because of the lack of
management skill
and the politicians are to blame for it
you know we've passed two water bonds in
the last 10 years and they've yet to
spend most of the money from those water
bonds this is the voters have spoken
they said we we want uh water stored and
you know another constitutional
amendment isn't going to do the job we
need to get just better leadership kevin
faulconer
the only solution we get from gavin
newsom every time we're in a drought is
take a shorter shower
that's not going to cut it
we have to build more storage we have to
increase the supply in california in
fact just last week i had the pleasure
to be up in maxwell about an hour north
meeting with folks on the site's
reservoir we have to turn that into
reality
we have the ability to do not only that
but temperance flat down further south
and about we have to increase our supply
and for a governor to just give lip
service to that but not actually take
the steps and the emergency steps
necessary to get these reservoirs going
i think is unconscionable and it has to
be an all-of-the-above approach and i
have a lot of experience with that as
when i was mayor of san diego we moved
forward on one of the biggest water
recycling programs right now going on in
the state of california
we have desalinization in san diego
county strong proponent and supporter of
that and so instead of what we see from
gavin newsom
every single year take a shorter shower
cut back we have to get smart increase
the supply we know what needs to be done
i will have the experience and the
political will to get it done but what
do you do the day after you become
governor when people don't have water
because reservoirs take years to build
what do you do for those months in
between i will move immediately on
building reservoirs day one slat night
told not only that insights reservoir as
well these have been on the books
forever we have funding in the water
bonds but we haven't had the political
will to move forward we have to start i
will start on my first day as governor
kevin pathrav pafras same question thank
you very much well much of what we've
heard here about solving our water
crisis is the same old that we've heard
a lot of complaining the same thing that
we heard with our covet plans the folks
on the stage with me did not have strong
plans and they each had to be asked
follow-up questions for what their
actual plans would be we need emergency
action when it comes to our water crisis
on day one i will declare a state of
emergency
to begin the construction
as soon as feasibly possible of a
pipeline to the mississippi river we
will build an interstate pipeline by
coordinating with joe biden in the
federal government now this sounds
outlandish but we have a massive problem
researchers and phds have come up with a
solution it would take just 14 power
plants to pump water here we can buy
cheaper cleaner water there's enough
federal land between here and there with
the exception of texas where we're going
to rent land we're going to double the
flow of water to the mississippi river
we need strong ideas and that's why i'm
polling better than all three candidates
on the stage combined in august both
polls in august i poll better than all
three combined by a four to nine percent
margin because my plans will work have
you explored cooperation with these
other states to do something like that
absolutely here's the thing we have
spoken with a lot of folks about our
plans but what i want to be very clear
about first is i stand for win-win
negotiations i recognize that we're not
just going to take water but we also do
desal conservation wells we're going to
do everything all hands on deck but we
need more water we need to double the
flow of water to the colorado river it
would only take four percent of the
water from the mississippi well from
water we're going to go to fire now yes
we're in the middle of another
record-breaking wildfire season which
has leveled towns and
a destroyed property all over the state
do you favor restricting new development
in high fire risk zones john cox will
come to you first
no i don't i do i
favor
better management to deal with the fires
this is again another problem of the
politicians and the celebrities who have
run the state into the ground
uh we solve the problem and how do we do
that we manage the forest we go in and
we get rid of the tinling the uh
the
dead trees and all these things that are
going to cause fires to be you know
become infernos
we also revive the timber industry which
has been run out of this state they did
a lot of the fire forest management uh
before they were run out of the state
and then we need to have
new ideas like a
air force i saw today there's a new fire
in grass valley i mean if we had decent
air force if we weren't spending four
million dollars a day on that train to
nowhere in the central valley i propose
taking that money and buying or leasing
a whole bunch of jets there's never been
more jets available than any time in
history outfit them with tanks and make
sure you go after these fires and put
them out before they become infernos
that money for the train was set aside
by a constitutional amendment passed by
voters do you favor going back to the
ballot to
to redirect that money toward wildfires
that yeah if necessary but i'll tell you
what that project is way over budget way
behind schedule it's a honey pot for all
kinds of interest groups that are making
money out of it and the taxpayers are
footing the bill it's wrong okay thank
you kevin faulconer do you favor
restricting development in high fire
risk zones i favor putting our state on
a war footing when it comes to wildfire
and what we see from gavin newsom year
after year is rhetoric he'll go out and
talk about climate change but he won't
take action he won't take action what we
need to here in california to do it
and so that's why i believe we have to
and i will declare a state of emergency
as governor to move forward immediately
on the fuel reduction that hasn't been
occurring in our forests that need to on
the brush management on all of the
emergency ingress in the aggressive fire
exits that haven't been constructed
because this governor won't do it and
what did he do
he cut the funding from cal fire last
year and then he also went out and tried
to take credit
for treating acres of force that never
actually happened
i'm going to treat this as the emergency
that it is because lives are literally
at stake
and if we do not actually get in and
reduce those fuels do that brush
measurement by providing a tax credit
for home hardening
that's the only way we're actually going
to make a difference on this in
california and again it starts by saying
we have to change it immediately put our
state on a war footing for wildfire
prevention so just quickly yes or no do
you favor restrictions on development
i favor giving the increases that we
want for folks to do their home
hardening and we need to do that and all
the legislation that's out there
it works okay thank you um
kevin paphrath same question to you i'll
answer the question no i do not favor
restrictions i favor doing what our
governor said he was going to do now i
understand i'm running as a democrat and
i encourage people to vote yes on that
second question for kevin paffreth as a
backup but here's the reality have a
bone to pick with governor newsom he
overstated fire prevention by 690
percent he was exposed by npr for doing
that the day he was exposed
we had governor newsome's administration
try to cover up that they ever made that
promise which is news that came out last
week
but look here's the reality
the economist told us that in 2017
portugal had devastating wildfires then
conducted controlled burns at a cost of
just 35 an acre versus the 1500 an acre
it cost to fight wildfires
and then they didn't have a devastating
wildfire since and that's what we need
we need a governor who's actually going
to do what he says he's going to do
but i don't think that could be a
republican
that's because we have a 75 percent
democratic control in congress and
democrats in congress will sandbag a
republican governor through the 2022
election by overriding vetoes from a
republican governor by overriding
emergency action and overriding or
delaying appointments this is why we
need a jfk style democrat vote kevin
paffroth thank you uh kevin kiley do you
favor restricting new development in
high fire risk zones uh i will agree
with my namesake and uh i want to thank
him for underlining something that is
abundantly clear to any everyone except
gavin newsom which is that this is not a
partisan recall this has been bipartisan
multi-partisan from the beginning it's
about the failures of our government to
do the most basic things like manage our
forests and the result of course is that
our communities are at risk and we keep
having these catastrophic events so i
don't think it's necessary to restrict
development there alexi i think that in
the areas where there's an unavoidably
high risk people are not going to be
eager to build and there are plenty of
places to build but i will say this it's
an entirely different story for folks
who already live in areas that have
become high risk thanks to the state's
negligence we have many many people in
this state whose fire insurance rates
have doubled have tripled more they've
lost their coverage they've had to go to
the california fare plan and it's
imposed a real economic hardship their
homes have become unsalable and i do
think those folks need tax relief it
should come in the form of a tax credit
which i actually proposed in the
legislature but the larger issue is that
we need to actually start prioritizing
forest management we have 15 to 20
million acres of overgrown forests in
this state and we're seeing the tragic
results of it year after year thank you
very much our next question is another
one that viewers submitted and it has to
do with housing affordability spoiler
alert they think it's really expensive
to live in our state so
some democrats have pushed to make it
more affordable and easier to build
small apartment buildings in residential
areas and neighborhoods or to turn
unused commercial property into
residential housing so would you sign a
package of bills to allow those kinds of
changes to happen and we start this time
with kevin faulconer
our state is too expensive first and
foremost and people are voting with
their feet they're leaving our state
because they can't raise their family
they can't afford a home gavin newsom
appointed himself as the homeless are
the housings are right everything under
the sun but yet doesn't take the action
necessary to actually construct the
units
a lot of experience in that
as mayor of san diego i brought together
democrats and republicans to pass one of
the most significant reforms to help
increase housing in san diego increase
the supply where we want it along our
transit quarters we called it complete
communities it's going to make a huge
difference i eliminated the regulatory
burdens to construct that eliminating
things like parking requirements to make
it easier so you can get more units
i have the experience in actually not
only getting these plans there but
getting them across the finish line in
this case the super majority democrat
city council
we have to make housing more affordable
in california and i will take the same
types of steps that i took as mayor
those immediate steps that says we're
going to cut through the bureaucracy
we're going to build more homes we're
going to build them where we want them
to be which is along our transit
corridors and we can actually do it
all right we'll go to uh kevin paffrath
you certainly have a lot of youtube
videos on topics like this where do you
stand on
it california currently builds just 80
000 housing units per year to break even
with our housing disaster we need to be
building 300 000 homes per year that's
to break even
kevin faulconer mentions that we should
build along our transit coordinator
quarters that's not enough that's not
enough it's not that it will create a
drop in the bucket for our housing
crisis
it doesn't help that when you had a real
estate deal in san diego 101 ash you
understated repairs and ended up costing
115 million dollars then you stated they
would 115 million dollars more here's
what we need to do
we need to build hundreds of thousands
of homes throughout california ideally
half a million homes per year there are
482 cities in this state
we build them outside of our large
cities we'll average them out we will
have affordable housing again that way
we're not affecting housing prices
within our city but instead we're
providing an affordable option outside
of our cities and then we can have
better infrastructure to connect these
homes
we will also make these communities net
negative by building them near and
around solar and wind farms but we must
build more houses fast by streamlining
the permitting process and enabling
californians to build
yeah you can no you have 30 seconds to
respond i'm happy to it's not the time
for on-the-job training
for youtube somebody that's never
actually had to get legislation across
actually had to get the units
constructed and built and actually take
the stance to get housing constructed in
california i think that's a clear
difference between you and me my friend
and that's why it's important that we
elect a governor that can actually get
hit the ground on day one
who has success working with democrats
and republicans to actually get housing
across the finish line like we did in
san diego that will help a hundred
thousand new units to make it more
affordable for our families it's not
time to test drive it's time to actually
have somebody who has the experience to
do it all right it's kevin kylie's turn
i'll remind you i'm sorry i should
respond to that the ques we're going to
move to kevin colley the question to
remind you is would you sign a package
of bills to make changes including
building small apartment buildings
within existing residential
neighborhoods or turning unused
commercial properties into housing well
it's hard to commit to signing or not
signing a bill in the abstract there's a
lot of things we need to be doing about
housing
and you know some of the ideas you
mentioned may have merit but uh
fundamentally this is the issue uh more
than any other that is the reason the
american dream is falling apart in
california this used to be the state
where anyone could get ahead it's now
the state that so many people can't wait
to leave behind last year for the first
time in california history our
population declined by 182 thousand
people we just lost a seat in congress
based upon the last census now gavin
newsom came into office he ran for the
governorship claiming that he'd do a
marshall plan for housing but he's
produced nothing of the short as a
matter of fact he's delivered one-fifth
of the units that he promised now you'll
get other states they can get projects
off the ground in weeks and for
thousands of dollars that in california
take years and cost millions of dollars
that's the reason we don't have the
housing supply that we need and there
are very simple reforms we can make to
get the results that other states do
reforming sequa rolling back the costs
that add 150 000 to the price of a home
before the project even gets off the
ground certainly streamlining the
approval process okay the last person to
answer these questions john cox well
i've been in the housing business for
over 40 years so i have the experience
and i'm not a politician and the
politicians have jawbone about this for
years you know this isn't just a supply
issue that's certainly part of the issue
but it's the cost of building and mr
kylie referred to it uh i build for a
living most my building is done in
indiana uh i can build there for 125
dollars a square foot here in california
it's 450 500 a foot you can build 300
000 units all you want but you're never
going to make it affordable when it's
that expensive and it's driven up as mr
kylie said by sql by the impact fees by
the lawsuits i can get approvals in six
to 12 months in indiana and i assure you
that people in indiana care about the
environment they care about traffic they
care about building standards and it's
not the cost of the land that's the
difference because when you're building
multi-family the cost of the land isn't
significant we need to get somebody as
experienced can bring down the cost of
housing because it is killing families
and their ability to live in this state
it's all about families but many of the
regulations that you refer to are in
place to protect things like air water
and labor is there one regulation you
would look to end first
like i said the people of indiana care
about the air water and labor as well
they managed to approve
property building in six to 12 months
not 12 years like here
they certainly have high standards as
well but they managed to get the and
it's done like that all across the
country california is the outlier here
and i think we all need to understand
that it's because of the politicians and
the celebrities that we've had running
the state
uh we're going to move on to the next
question um one of the biggest debates
to emerge from the recent racial justice
protests is whether the state should be
able to strip law enforcement officers
of their badges when they break the law
california is one of only four states in
the country where there is no statewide
process to do this but there is a bill
moving through the legislature right now
that would make that change
would you sign it kevin paffraff first
to you well first live three thousand
hours of experience in law enforcement
and i support our law enforcement
community but i also understand there
are problems in law enforcement we need
a massive community style policing
package in our legislature to make sure
we can reform law enforcement and i
would consider exactly what you've just
asked me
crime proposition 4757 we've got
problems we need to enforce the law we
don't need to defund the police we need
to properly fund the police not over
fund the police and that's what i stand
for now i'd like to respond to the claim
of experience i have 11 years working in
real estate and my experience doesn't
include ripping off my city
it also doesn't include a display a
disdain for transparency or such a
disdain for california that you prefer
to invest in real estate outside of
california
all the properties i own are in
california i respect the experience i
have in real estate here the reality is
i am a jfk style democrat who can work
with our democratic legislature
a vote for any republican including the
ones who are not here is a wasted vote
and whether you are yes or no on recall
you should vote for kevin paffraff and
see my full plan at meetcavin.com okay
thank you um kevin kiley would you sign
a police or decertification bill well i
will answer that question alexa let me
just say first that you know i believe
there is room for criminal justice
reform and police reform where
appropriate i authored a bill brought
together the aclu uh and law enforcement
to provide transparency in for grand
jury proceedings and officer involved
shooting cases and for example in the
brianna taylor case after there was the
decision not to move forward there the
family wanted to see the transcript if
that had taken place in california they
could have because of my bill now with
respect to the specific bill that you're
talking about i think everyone agrees
there needs to be a fair process but i
can't just commit to whatever the the
bill may be at this point in time in my
years in the legislature i've spent five
years in the legislature i can tell you
that these things are sort of a moving
target a lot of times as they won their
way through the legislature but the
larger issue is this that we have had a
a policy towards our law enforcement in
california that has been
incredibly disrespectful i mean the
slogan defund the police is one of the
most defensive political slogans ever
concocted and i think that at the end of
the day we need to restore the reverence
and respect for law enforcement that
they deserve and also put public safety
first in our communities again at a time
when crime rates are rising okay thank
you very much john cox would you sign a
police decertification bill we need to
get the politics out of this we need to
make sure that we have the most
professional law enforcement force that
we can muster and that means we need to
get the politicians out of the picture
we need to make sure certainly that we
have a transparent process that weaves
out people that abuse their badge that's
a very rare occurrence by the way and i
think it stains a lot of the people that
already serve i mean
my law partner has a son in in the
police and and he says he doesn't
understand how his son continues to
serve because of all the abuse that
they're getting
the politics gets into this and we don't
have the leadership that stands up and
defends the police
99.9 percent of whom do a good job they
deserve our respect
they certainly we certainly have to have
body cameras and make sure that we go
after police who abuse their power but
that is such a rare occurrence i agree
defund the police is not the way that we
should go we need to get rid of 47 and
57 we need to enforce the law make sure
that crime
is is punished that's the first role of
government so this question was about a
process to strip law enforcement
officers of their badges when they break
the law just to be clear do you support
that concept or not i i certainly think
that
a police officer was found in a
professional hearing that's not
politicized
found to have committed a crime or
abused his power certainly should be
stripped i don't believe it should be
run from the state down i don't believe
in top down so that's a no no on a
statewide process okay thank you kevin
faulconer same question
i stood up during a very difficult time
in our city i had hundreds of protesters
out in front of my house yelling at me
my family defund the police i stood up
and said no
i hired the first female police chief in
the history of san diego we were
selected as the nation's safest big city
in america why because i understand that
balance and what you have to do to
protect your city and actually bring
people together in a safe way it takes
character and judgment i'm going to take
this opportunity because one of the
people that is not here tonight larry
elder does not have the character the
judgment the skill set or the experience
to be governor and i've been very
outspoken this week and i'm going to
take one more opportunity to do so
his attack
on working women is unconscionable to
all the working moms out there know that
with kevin faulconer as your governor
i'm going to support your right to raise
a family to have a career
unlike what larry elder's talking about
i'm going to make sure that california's
daughters
have the same opportunities as
california's sons we need a governor
that's going to stand up for working
women and knows that every woman in this
state
can have a career can raise a family and
to all the working moms out there right
now i want to say one thing thank you
thank you for what you're doing we value
you we can't wait to work with you is
there is there a specific policy uh
promoting gender equality that you would
try to pursue as governor
it is and talk a lot about the
opportunity for equal pay that's
incredibly important i promoted some
women into the top management positions
in our city was i was mayor i understand
how important that what about as
governor rather than exactly
okay it's going to be a strong point
i'll be talking more about that later
okay thank you
our next question has to deal with tax
cuts many californians believe the cost
of living is too high in the state i'm
sure that is not a surprise to you
what would you do to make california
more affordable and for those of you who
have proposed tax cuts please be
specific about how you would make up for
the loss in revenue and this time we
start with kevin kiley
well we do need lower taxes and you
don't need to make up for the loss in
revenue i mean i talk to people who who
hate the taxes but they say look if i
was at least getting something in return
for it in terms of the quality of
government service then i'd be okay with
it i mean you know we just gavin newsome
just signed a 267 billion dollar budget
by far the largest in state history the
budget has more than doubled in just the
last decade yet do you look around and
say wow look at these beautiful
reservoirs and dams we have look at our
perfectly paved roads look at our
sterling public schools no of course not
everything has continued to get worse
the quality of life in california has
continued to decline that is the story
of modern california as epitomized by
gavin newsom that we sacrifice the most
and get the least in return and why is
that it's because i've seen this in my
five years in the legislature that our
state government is fundamentally broken
and what has broken it is political
corruption we have a state capital that
is entirely run by lobbyists and special
interests which is why i'm the only
elected official at the state level in
california that refuses all special
interest funding because we need to get
back to the idea of government by the
people john cox yes or no on tax cuts i
propose the largest tax cut in the
history of california across the board
25 percent this state taxes its people
way too much it's not just the income
tax it's the corporate tax the sales tax
is one of the highest in the country the
gas tax is one of the highest in the
country our gasoline prices are now
approaching six dollars a gallon in most
of california the cost of living is way
too high it's literally killing families
and forcing them to break up and move to
other states and you know the parents
then have to move themselves
the real problem is spending i'm a cpa
and i can't wait to get my hands on this
budget i practice zero based budgeting
in my own businesses i've done that for
40 years you start at zero you don't
just take last year's budget and add
money to it you know when i'm the
governor i'm gonna have to appoint three
thousand political appointees that's
ridiculous we shouldn't have that many
appointees we shouldn't have most of the
boards and commissions we have we're
going to have an audit of every single
agency starting with the edd and we just
learned of a homeless
audit that was blistering in terms of
its criticism of governor newsom that
was just released today they have no
idea what they're spending the money on
it takes too long to get done and they
have no idea if it's even helping
homelessness this has got to change we
moved to kevin faulconer where do you
stand on tax cuts
we have to give californians the relief
that they deserve
yet our state is too expensive people
are leaving and everyone is listening to
us tonight understands we need to let
you keep more of your hard-earned tax
dollars in your own pocket not send it
to sacramento
and that's the same thing that we get
from gavin newsom in the legislature
year after year send more money
the fact that we're at a 70 billion
dollar surplus
i've proposed the largest middle class
tax cut in california history
one reason to make sure folks have been
able to keep that so they can afford to
live here in our great state
and it's significant what do we have we
have kevin newsom going around
giving out a stimulus check six hundred
dollars and thinking that that's the be
all end all it's not it's not even close
we need permanent lasting tax relief and
my plan is real dollars in people's
pockets enough for eight months of
grocery eight months of utility bills 92
tanks of gas and that's just for
starters we've got to stop being the
highest taxing state
in this nation and understand that we're
going to create good quality jobs help
california families by letting you keep
more of what you earn that is a huge
difference between what we're seeing
from this governor who only wants to tax
and we'll end this question with the
democrat on stage thank you very much
well i've heard a lot of complaining
from my fellow candidates here but the
reality is i have not heard a plan as a
jfk style candidate i have a plan
step one no homeless on our streets
within 60 days we have a very thorough
plan for making sure homeless can
finally get the dignity and services
they deserve homelessness costs
california eighty thousand dollars per
year per homeless person
is very expensive then step two we need
to solve the causes of homelessness
we can't be the fifth largest economy in
the world with schools in the bottom
twenty percent we need to teach
financial education in our schools we
need to teach mental education in our
schools provide drug treatment services
one dollar into drug treatment services
saves us three dollars in crime and with
the legislature i will pass a very
comprehensive package to address housing
transportation and traffic and busing we
will address homelessness and the causes
with drugs and mental health and we will
also make sure we have future schools in
the state now my full plan is at meet
kevin.com but the reality is once we
invest in californians then we can lower
taxes and we can make california
competitive by cutting taxes on anyone
making less than 250 000
to zero once we properly invest in
california okay we need to move into
round two of our questioning tonight and
this shrinks your answers to 30 seconds
okay
so good luck governor newsom i think
everybody would agree has been dealt a
unique set of challenges
everything from the pandemic to the
recession wildfires drought civil rights
unrest
in your view
what has he done well
and what would you continue
and we'll start this time with
john cox
this state is a mismanaged mess i mean
you can't really name anything that this
governor has done well uh i might have
agreed with in the first couple weeks of
covid where he you know cautioned us to
slow down for two weeks to stop the
spread but beyond that his pandemic
management was an inconsistent disaster
and listen we don't have electricity we
don't have water we have live in fear of
fires crime is rising
housing prices are out of sight taxes
are out of sight the homeless problem
has only gotten worse when in the the
audit today said that we don't even know
what the money was spent for we got to
stop with these politicians
the question is
name something he's done well and what
could you seek at the very beginning of
covet we all pulled together as a state
those are very difficult days for all of
us i was mayor of san diego and i had
one goal keeping us all healthy and safe
and communicating but i think the
problem we saw from this governor is
again he went into lockdown mode he went
into a one-size-fits-all policy that's
that just caused all of the shutdowns
that caused our school closures that is
not the right way to do it we have to
bring people together as i did when i
was mayor republicans democrats
independents and i will make sure that
we put the facts forward first and move
forward in one direction not
a top down policy to kevin paffraff now
something the governor has done well
that you could see continuing
the governor's done a great job at
branding this election as a republican
recall unfortunately he's wrong
i'm a democrat running against the
governor that's one thing he's done well
but here's the problem we have a big
threat and that threat isn't here to
defend himself that's larry elder that's
because larry elders with his
disinformation friends tucker carlson
and laura ingram right before this
debate aired he went on laura ingram's
show
it's time to end the big threat and make
sure that larry elder does not become
the next governor by voting for kevin
paffraff
kevin kiley can you name something the
governor has done well that you could
see continuing so the governor actually
is my constituent i should say he lives
in my assembly district and one thing
that he's done well is he does these big
splashy announcements like he did uh
with fire mitigation efforts which my
friend over here uh said uh pointed out
has was exaggerated by 690 percent
there's never any follow-through but
what's worse is you know kind of the
image that should stay with people about
gavin newsom is the one of the french
laundry not because of the hypocrisy but
because of who he was there with a table
full of lobbyists that is who this
governor listens to and what we need in
our next governor is someone who will
actually serve the people of california
thank you
all right this is our final question the
integrity of our elections was
challenged last year and one of the
candidates in this race larry elder has
promoted unfounded theories that the
recall election is rigged against him do
you believe this election is fair and
will you accept the results of the
recall
kevin faulconer first to you said larry
elder's unfit to serve as governor of
this state doesn't have the character of
the judgment today we just found out by
the way that he supports legalizing some
of the most dangerous drugs on our
streets in california
that's crazy it's not just dangerous
it's crazy
not only will what will that will mean
for our homeless encampments and it'll
grow beyond exponential belief but think
of all of our families and our kids what
those dangerous drugs opioids are if you
legalize all the heroin methamphetamine
that's big no that's terrible there's no
place for that for a candidate who's
running for governor accept the results
of this election dramatically worse will
you accept the results of this election
just yes or no
uh yeah i'm planning on winning and i
and i can't wait great kevin pafras same
question to you i don't know about the
plans to win right now i'm beating all
three of you in the polls combined but i
will accept the results of this election
i do understand the secretary of state
needs a lot of work i have a bone to
pick with the secretary of state but we
have to remember nothing's going to get
done and i'm so worried about california
for the future of my children i have
three i'm sorry i have two children
one's three once five i'm so worried
about the future of california
and a republican governor will sandbag
california for a year as democrats take
complete control until 2022 to win the
governorship back okay thank you kevin
kiley do you believe this is a fair
election and will you accept the results
well it should be pointed out first that
actually there is a lawsuit right now to
try to cancel the election and there are
people in gavin newsom's inner circle
who seem to be supportive of this effort
they have tried every step of the way to
delegitimize the recall they called it
the california coup and indeed gavin
newsom himself signed a bill to change
california law a couple months ago in
order to allow the date of the election
to be moved when went to the date where
he thought he had the best chance of
winning and so there is no doubt that
this election has
the scales have been tilted uh in favor
of the incumbent here and i think that's
why a lot of people distrust our
election process will you accept the
results of this recall election we won't
even know when the results will begin
once that's certified it's certified so
yes you will accept certified it is
thank you and john cox finally to you i
will accept the uh results and uh but
i'll make it clear that i don't want all
mail ballots uh
south korea did an in-person election in
april of 2020 in the middle of the
pandemic because they wanted people to
trust you know that's what we need
people we need to get away from the
politicians and the media types and all
the attacks going on here from the
politicians the media we need to get a
business person that's actually going to
solve the problem maryland massachusetts
have republican businessmen as governors
and they're the most popular governors
in the country because they solve
problems that's what we need to go to we
need to get away from this partisan
policy thank you very much for your time
round two of our questioning take a
breath we'll toss it back over to
gulstan dartmouth all right thanks dear
to great exchange there we're going to
take a quick break right now when we
come back tonight the candidates will be
making their final statements
[Music]
welcome back we're wrapping up our
debate for the gubernatorial recall
election four candidates are ready to
make their final statements they each
have one minute and we're going to start
tonight with john cox
imagine a california where you can buy
an affordable home where you don't have
to see homeless all over parks and
beaches where you have enough water we
have enough electricity imagine a
california where you don't have to worry
about rising crime or wildfires
threatening you where the taxes don't
tax you to death where you can you can
actually have a decent sense of life
you know let's stop electing the
politicians and media celebrities who
are all talk
i've built a business over 40 years by
solving problems and delivering results
i'm not doing this to get a job i'm not
doing this to move up the rung of
political ladder i'm doing this to save
this state because it needs to have that
done we need to fix this state we need
to get away from the mismanagement these
aren't political issues these are
management issues and they can be solved
that's the good news we just have to
have a leader who is interested in
solving
the problems and not practicing politics
kevin kiley you're next
well this election is happening because
many many californians have demanded it
more than ever have signed a petition in
united states history you know and
people of all partisan affiliations all
backgrounds who look around and see that
we have the highest poverty that we have
the most homelessness that we have the
greatest level of inequality that we
have failing public schools that we have
crumbling infrastructure and they ask
how is it that our beautiful state
became last in everything and as i've
seen as a member of the legislature for
five years the answer is that we have a
broken state government so if you're
someone who is frustrated with the
direction of our state you want to stay
here you want to raise your family here
you want to retire here but maybe you're
reluctant to cross party lines what i
would say is this take a chance on
change the recall is for you you're not
signing on for four years you're signing
on for one year so you can see if things
improve and then if not you can vote for
a return to the way things are next year
but if i'm elected i think you will see
things improve because my administration
will be about back to basics pave our
roads manage our forests store our water
maintain our grid fund our police do the
things government is supposed to do all
right kevin patharoth your turn thank
you very much we've heard a lot of
vision from other candidates but no real
plans i understand my plans are bold
so are jfk's
my plans are
to end our homeless crisis to solve our
housing crisis to solve our school
crisis our crime crisis our water crisis
and our fire crisis
all the details of which of course are
at meatkevin.com but we have to remember
one thing
we've got to go out with the old and win
in with the bold and that's what i bring
bold plans because we need this in
california otherwise in 20 years my
children i fear will ask me why i raise
them in a state that's now bankrupt that
is what i fear
but i also fear
a governor who can't get anything done
over this next year lame duck governor
and since i am polling the best of the
candidates on this debate stage
i would ask them to drop out of the race
and endorse me kevin paffrath on the
second part of the ballot so we can
defeat larry elder and bring bold change
to california
and kevin faulconer you will have the
last word tonight well thank you
it's time to stop the circus
this is very serious times for our state
we don't want to replace one
dysfunctional governor with another
i'm going to bring
the experience the judgment
somebody who can bring our state
together it's exactly what i did when i
was mayor of san diego in a very
difficult time
when we had a mayor that needed to be
replaced and i stepped in and we made a
huge difference somebody who can bring
together democrats
republicans and independents who will
provide the real solutions and the
leadership
on day one
that's the serious stakes that are
involved here it's no time to test drive
a governor
and to all of you who are listening out
tonight whether you're a democrat
independent or republican i ask for your
help
and your support
and your vote
i'm running because i believe that i
strongly believe that california's best
days are ahead of us
i'm ready to lead on the issues that
matter to you and with your help and
support i can't wait to be the next
governor of the great state of
california
all right with that gentlemen we want to
thank you for being here with us tonight
and sharing your views on what you think
the future of california should look
like that is all the time we have again
we want to thank all of our candidates
for joining us remember voters can vote
on one or both parts of this recall and
you can mail back your ballot anytime as
long as it is postmarked by september
14th and you can also drop off your
ballot at a secure ballot drop box or a
voting location or your county's
election office by 8 pm september 14th
we want to thank you for joining us
tonight for this special debate i'm
gulstan dart on behalf of kcra 3 and the
san francisco chronicle we say get out
and vote have a good night
[Music]
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.