TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Fed's Minutes Signal PANIC

12m 36s2,198 words325 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

wow the Federal Reserve minutes just

0:01

came out and I have to say you know at

0:05

the FED meeting how we got this like

0:07

really hawkish Powell remember before

0:10

the FED meeting how I predicted like if

0:12

jpow gets his 50 he's going to have to

0:15

Hawk and that's what happened now I

0:17

wasn't expecting some of the things that

0:19

ended up happening in the market but but

0:20

we thought if JP goes 50 he's going to

0:23

Hawk and he hawked at I mean he hawked

0:25

to us it was crazy how much he hawked

0:28

everything's fine the economy's fine

0:30

everything's fine well when you actually

0:32

look under the hood it's like oh damn

0:35

this four cylinder is about to bust it

0:38

don't look very good and I'm going to

0:40

just restrict this conversation to the

0:44

most important part of what came out of

0:46

these fed minutes and let's discuss them

0:49

and talk about pricing power and what's

0:51

going on here but it's actually

0:53

potentially a lot more dire than jpow

0:56

really let on at the last meeting uh and

0:59

I think important to have this

1:00

discussion of you know if they screw

1:03

this up it's very difficult to fix think

1:06

about this you can fix low inflation by

1:10

printing more money but you can't get

1:12

jobs back once they're gone and folks

1:15

that's like the definition of what we

1:16

just saw in these minutes these minutes

1:18

highlight a dovish Fed not the hawk that

1:22

we got from japal let's go into some of

1:25

the minutes together and see what we've

1:26

got here so this is the section I want

1:29

to get started in we we already know

1:30

they're going to be data dependent all

1:31

the reports are going to matter blah

1:33

blah blah blah blah we already know that

1:34

the last jobs report was basically

1:38

785,000 government workers we already

1:41

know that in the household seasonally

1:43

adjusted level that is 785,000

1:46

government workers out of nowhere out of

1:49

somehow appearing in payrolls lowering

1:52

the unemployment rate with this massive

1:55

seasonal adjustment after you remove all

1:57

the teachers you still get a 785 K boost

2:01

that means you actually lost like over

2:03

250,000 regular jobs yeah it it wasn't a

2:07

good labor report although everybody's

2:09

been cheering about how great the labor

2:10

report is well listen to the FED here

2:13

because if you go to the FED minutes you

2:14

go to page seven and on this is where

2:16

you're going to see the biggest pain

2:19

first I want you to see some of the

2:20

things that the FED is really worried

2:22

about first they see a modest slowing in

2:26

GDP but that's just the start as GDP

2:29

starts slowing I understand GDP was hot

2:31

with estimates in September but you have

2:33

to also keep in mind the September pull

2:36

forward may have been heavily due to the

2:40

port strikes salespeople calling up

2:42

going hey get your order in now before

2:44

those Port strikes shut everything down

2:46

obviously those are over now and in fact

2:49

when you look at wholesale trade numbers

2:50

that we got this morning they were half

2:53

a percentage Point worse than expected

2:56

so we got substantially worse wholesale

2:58

trade numbers this morning which is

3:00

somewhat indicative of yes we had a pull

3:02

forward last month but it ain't going to

3:04

last with some of the data going forward

3:07

and the FED is keenly aware of this they

3:09

see a slowing of real GDP coming on top

3:13

of a slowing of real GDP they see waning

3:16

pricing power and I understand everybody

3:18

wants deflation like that's the thing

3:20

it's like yay we want lower prices but

3:22

people forget that deflation means

3:25

businesses can't show growth when

3:27

businesses can't show growth St stocks

3:30

don't go up so what do businesses do

3:33

when they can't show growth on the top

3:34

line they show growth on the bottom line

3:37

they do that hopefully with lower input

3:39

costs via Commodities or producer prices

3:42

or they cut jobs and that's the problem

3:45

because even the FED in these minutes

3:46

acknowledges that while companies aren't

3:48

conducting layoffs they are hiring less

3:52

people who are quitting jobs aren't

3:53

getting the pay premium they used to and

3:56

companies are just well kind of let

3:59

people go via attrition and then not

4:01

rehiring them when they leave they're

4:03

doing more with less so while it sounds

4:06

good to have increased productivity

4:08

remember increased productivity is

4:10

another way of saying we need fewer

4:12

workers waning pricing power means we

4:15

can only grow wages or sorry EPS through

4:20

fewer workers so I mean think about this

4:22

for a moment in an anchored inflationary

4:25

expect expected environment with slowing

4:27

GDP growth I'm going to put down arrows

4:30

for every time it would push jobs down

4:32

slowing GDP growth jobs down waning

4:35

pricing Power jobs down I actually think

4:37

there are very few companies if any that

4:40

actually have pricing power right now I

4:42

think it's a pretty precarious time

4:44

especially where valuations are

4:46

increases in productivity reduces the

4:48

demand for labor a softening in

4:50

commodity prices that could that could

4:53

be neutral so we'll leave that one

4:54

unmarked several participants noted that

4:57

nominal wage growth had continued to

4:59

slow with few participants citing that

5:01

it was set to decline further that

5:03

reduces consumption which starts the

5:05

cycle of more layoffs these signs

5:08

include lower rates of cyclically

5:10

sensitive wages and data indicating job

5:12

switchers were no longer receiving the

5:14

premium over other workers some

5:16

participants noted that wages were a

5:18

relatively large portion of a business

5:20

business's costs in the service sector

5:22

and that that service sector deflation

5:25

would ultimately be assisted by nominal

5:28

wage growth in other words deflation

5:30

like inflation's not the problem we're

5:32

probably going to see more

5:34

disinflation but that could also come

5:36

especially since jobs are a large

5:39

portion of a business's cost in the

5:40

service sector potentially also jobs

5:43

down several participants noted that

5:46

supply and demand in the labor market

5:47

was roughly balanced wage increases were

5:50

unlikely to be a source of wage

5:52

pressures we've heard Jerome Powell talk

5:53

about this before with regard to Housing

5:55

Services some participants suggested we

5:57

could see more rapid disinflation AR

6:00

Trends coming this basically means more

6:03

disinflation less inflationary risks

6:06

more labor market risk the labor market

6:09

was now less tight than it was just

6:10

before the pandemic and some

6:12

participants stress that rather than

6:14

using layoffs to low lower labor demand

6:17

uh businesses had instead been taking

6:19

steps to post fewer job openings

6:20

reducing hours or making use of

6:22

attritions what we already talked about

6:24

participants observed that the

6:25

evaluation of Labor Market developments

6:27

had been challenging with increased

6:30

immigration revisions to payroll data

6:33

and possible changes in the underlying

6:35

growth rate regarding productivity in

6:37

other words it's kind of like the FED

6:39

feels like they're flying in the clouds

6:42

with no instruments this is bad they

6:46

they're basically saying we can't fully

6:48

trust the data right now and what we're

6:50

starting to see is that labor is

6:53

weakening and inflation's less of a

6:55

problem so way less of an inflation

6:57

problem way more of a Lab problem than

7:00

japal LED on at his press conference now

7:03

participants indicated that the Baseline

7:05

is that the labor market would remain

7:07

solid but some also argued that once you

7:11

get labor market easing the risk that

7:14

easing could transition to a more

7:16

serious deterioration

7:19

increases and the problem with that is

7:22

once you start they say it themselves

7:24

once you start having um I can't

7:27

remember exactly where it was but

7:29

basically once you start getting uh a

7:32

weakening in the labor market it's

7:34

really hard to fix it now they said that

7:38

business contracts were optimistic about

7:40

economic Outlook but they were

7:42

exercising caution this is something you

7:44

saw in the beige book as well where

7:46

they're basically like we're looking

7:47

forward to a good Q4 but what if we

7:49

don't have a good Q4 what if the holiday

7:52

season sucks what about these slowing

7:54

expenditures or these strains on

7:56

household budgets and delinquencies and

7:58

credit cards and automobile loans and

8:00

the fact that the level of 27 weeks of

8:02

unemployed workers has been rising

8:04

substantially and the only time it rises

8:06

substantially is in a recession right

8:09

now the stock market and bond market is

8:11

only pricing in like a 15% chance of

8:12

recession nobody is properly positioned

8:15

for a potential recession here but then

8:17

again you know this time's different

8:18

we're going to have a soft Landing a

8:20

couple participants however did not

8:22

perceive an increased risk of further

8:23

weakening these are the people that

8:25

actually kept the Federal Reserve in my

8:27

opinion from going a 20 with a 75 BP cut

8:30

I think there's so much stress coming

8:32

from these these fed officials that most

8:34

of them are like no the upside risk to

8:37

inflation have diminish and we've got

8:38

big problems potentially on labor coming

8:41

and a SL a sharper than expected slowing

8:44

in consumer spending in response to

8:46

labor market cooling uh or because of

8:49

these lower budgets from lower income

8:50

households could make it even harder

8:53

it's also remember worth always

8:56

considering that once the labor market

8:59

Market weakens it's a lot harder to fix

9:02

it take a look at this a few

9:04

participants highlighted in particular

9:07

the costs and challenges of addressing

9:09

such weakening in unemployment once it

9:12

is fully underway in other words if you

9:15

get a Fed here that is blind to the

9:18

downside risks they are going to drive

9:20

us into recession and even though we got

9:23

a hawkish Powell if you actually read

9:26

that labor report I wanted to go bullish

9:29

off of it but if you actually read that

9:32

labor report and if you actually look at

9:33

the data and you go oh man table alpha 8

9:36

is really bad private payrolls are

9:38

falling government uh you know

9:40

employment up after having already

9:43

subtracted out your uh teachers going

9:45

back to work oh and then how does that

9:47

compare to Prior September oh well if

9:50

you look at prior September it's really

9:52

bad you have non-farm payroll levels

9:55

huge adjustment up while at the which is

9:57

something you haven't seen before while

9:59

at the same time you have uh the people

10:02

actually responding to the survey at

10:03

record lows uh these are these are bad

10:07

things look at the adjustment that you

10:08

got in the government uh payrolls right

10:10

here you have three giant red lines like

10:13

this once in July of 22 December of 22

10:16

and once in this last report you know

10:19

hey you know what maybe just ignore it

10:22

uh but to me it's a red flag and that is

10:24

a doish Fed uh and I think right now the

10:27

fact that I mean it still blows my mind

10:29

that yields have risen as much as they

10:31

have but I think the higher yields go

10:33

right now the greater chance of people

10:37

flirting with recession I personally am

10:39

of the mindset that and this is not

10:42

personalized Financial advice but my

10:44

mindset is pay off margin please I don't

10:47

want to see you go bankrupt from margin

10:49

okay pay off margin think about

10:51

diversifying raise some cash raise some

10:55

cash for a post elction dip or something

10:57

okay but it is okay to take some profits

11:00

from the Vegas

11:01

table protect yourself that is a doish

11:05

fed and if you think that labor report

11:08

was good you did not read table A8 look

11:11

it up yourself type it into Google BLS

11:14

labor report click on it scroll to the

11:16

bottom PDF click on it scroll to page

11:20

18 alpha

11:22

8 then read private payrolls government

11:26

payrolls seasonally adjusted and

11:27

non-seasonally adjusted read both of

11:29

them and you will not think that job's

11:31

report was good good luck everyone why

11:33

not advertise these things that you told

11:35

us here I feel like nobody else knows

11:37

about this we'll we'll try a little

11:38

advertising and see how it goes

11:39

congratulations man you have done so

11:41

much people love you people look up to

11:43

you Kevin P there financial analyst and

11:45

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

11:47

your

11:48

take even though I'm a licensed

11:50

financial adviser licensed real estate

11:51

broker and becoming a stock broker this

11:52

video is not personalized advice for you

11:54

it is not tax legal or otherwise

11:56

personalized advice tailor to you this

11:58

video provides generalized respective

11:59

information and commentary any third

12:01

party content I show shall not be deemed

12:03

endorsed by me this video is not and

12:05

shall never be deemed reasonably

12:06

sufficient information for the purposes

12:08

of evaluating a security or investment

12:09

decision any links or promoted products

12:11

are either paid affiliations or products

12:13

or Services we may benefit from I also

12:15

personally operate an actively managed

12:16

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

12:19

hold long or short positions in various

12:21

Securities potentially including those

12:22

mentioned in this video however I have

12:24

no relationship to any issuer other than

12:26

house act nor am I presently acting as a

12:28

market maker make sure if you're

12:29

considering investing in house Haack to

12:30

always read the PPM at house.com

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.