TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Economic Collapse is Coming | Confronting Peter Schiff

2h 26m 10s26,932 words3,734 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

the whole banking system is completely

0:03

insolvent and the FED hasn't even raised

0:05

rates anywhere near high enough to get

0:07

rid of inflation we actually need much

0:09

higher rates than than where the FED

0:11

stopped the media keeps saying there's a

0:13

disconnect between the voters and the

0:15

economy no the disconnect is between the

0:18

data and the economy see people think

0:20

governments give them things government

0:21

doesn't have anything it has to take it

0:23

first it has to take it from somebody

0:25

who produced it to give it to somebody

0:27

who didn't but in the world of all

0:29

powerful AI everybody can have

0:31

everything and you just put your goggles

0:32

on and get your stimulus check and you

0:34

don't need a stimulus check your goggles

0:36

give you whatever you want right the AI

0:38

is so super intelligent that it's almost

0:40

like a God because of finra the little

0:43

guy can't even get professional help

0:45

they end up having to do it themselves

0:47

and they're more likely to get scammed

0:49

mean I wish we had no finra wish we had

0:51

no SEC eventually there's a collapse

0:53

eventually inflation Runs Out of Control

0:56

I've been trying to help people protect

0:59

themselves from this crisis for a long

1:01

time I'm investing to win the game I

1:03

don't have to get out of my stocks I own

1:05

the right stocks I have the winning

1:08

hand welcome back to another episode of

1:10

the meet Kevin show today we have the

1:12

honor and privilege to once again be at

1:14

Peter schiff's home Peter the last time

1:17

we were here it's about 10 months ago

1:19

Bitcoin has since doubled and we had a

1:21

big debate with your son about Bitcoin

1:24

what's going on well I guess I should

1:26

have bought some

1:27

huh what's the future I mean FS now is

1:30

well you know my son was trying to get

1:32

me to invest in uh AI stocks back then I

1:36

didn't even know what they were you know

1:38

he should have told me Nvidia you know

1:39

now he's been pushing me to Nvidia for

1:41

some time uh because he's really into AI

1:44

now not so much crypto anymore he

1:46

doesn't really talk about that oh really

1:48

what happened well AI you know he's just

1:50

you know that's his new thing so what

1:53

and so what do you think what what's

1:55

your position been I mean the ETFs are

1:57

these the next big thing for Bitcoin

2:00

much like uh when gold had its ETF back

2:03

in the early 2000s yeah you know that's

2:05

what the Bitcoin Community is is hoping

2:08

for or is you know that's the story

2:10

they're telling but I don't think that's

2:12

going to happen I I I don't think

2:14

there's this huge penup demand for

2:18

Bitcoin bitcoin's been around for a

2:21

while now and it's certainly been in the

2:24

spotlight since 2017 when it had the

2:27

initial big run but then really 2020

2:31

2021 you know with all the uh Super Bowl

2:35

commercials and you know just all the

2:37

hype uh and you know we they had the

2:40

Futures ETFs that came out a couple of

2:42

years ago uh and a lot of stocks you

2:46

know like Michael strategy came out

2:49

coinbase you had you know uh um what's

2:54

El

2:55

Salvador lots of stuff in the news about

2:58

crypto all the the uh celebrities and

3:02

influencers that that jumped on the

3:04

bandwagon so I think that most of the

3:07

people that wanted to buy bought I don't

3:11

think they were just nah I can't buy we

3:14

don't have a spot Bitcoin ETF like I'm

3:16

just waiting for that I don't think

3:18

there's all this demand I mean they they

3:22

think it's kind of like the Field of

3:23

Dreams well if we build an ETF then all

3:26

these investors are going to come and

3:28

they're going to buy it and I think the

3:30

buying already happened I think it was

3:33

you know buy the rumors sell the fact

3:34

for

3:35

years um the rumor of these ETFs was a a

3:40

major Catalyst to get people to buy

3:43

because they wanted to buy before the

3:44

ETFs so that they would already own it

3:47

and then when everybody else came to the

3:49

party and bought the ETFs you would make

3:52

a lot of money if you front ran it well

3:54

I think that that trade was was already

3:56

done you know the the gold ETFs the the

3:59

value

4:00

there was a lot of people didn't want to

4:04

buy the physical gold didn't want to

4:07

store it they were worried about losing

4:10

it and when you buy gold you you can't

4:14

really buy it at the spot price you have

4:16

to buy it in some form you got to buy a

4:18

coin you got to buy a bar so that adds

4:21

to the

4:22

cost and so the

4:25

ETFs took away some of that cost because

4:28

now you're buying into 100 ounce bars

4:30

which is a lot cheaper than you know

4:32

coins but you know you didn't have to

4:34

worry about storing it you can buy it

4:37

very simply in your brokerage account so

4:41

it did make it easier for a certain

4:43

segment of the market to buy gold but

4:47

with

4:48

Bitcoin anybody who wants Bitcoin can

4:51

just go buy it just set up a wallet I

4:53

mean that's what everybody has done in

4:55

fact the whole point of Bitcoin is not

4:57

to have a third party uh it's your own

4:59

Keys you don't have to trust somebody

5:01

else you don't have to pay storage fees

5:04

the

5:05

only I think reason it might make sense

5:09

for somebody to do an ETF is if it's in

5:11

an IRA and of course they have Bitcoin

5:14

IAS already uh but it is easier to buy

5:17

the ETF than to set up one of these IAS

5:21

but how much Ira money is really you

5:24

know wanting to go into Bitcoin that's

5:25

not already there I think people already

5:27

bought Bitcoin in their taxable accounts

5:31

it's completely inappropriate for an IRA

5:33

I mean most of the big firms probably

5:35

won't allow it certainly they wouldn't

5:37

allow it to be solicited in an IRA

5:39

because the broker could get sued uh for

5:42

putting something very speculative like

5:44

that they're making the allocation

5:47

decision so to speak or even if they

5:48

made a recommendation you know for cuz

5:51

an IRA I mean it's supposed to be a

5:52

retirement money supposed to be more

5:54

conservative I mean not gambling with it

5:58

uh so I don't I don't think there's a

6:00

big uh case to be made for the ETF it

6:03

was part of the hype and as you can see

6:06

you know the day the ETF started Bitcoin

6:10

almost hit

6:12

50,000 and it just got below 40,000

6:16

briefly a couple days ago so it sold off

6:19

and almost all the ETFs in fact all the

6:21

ETFs dropped 20% or more from their Peak

6:26

price on the day they started trading

6:28

which technically fits the Wall Street

6:30

definition of bare markets so we already

6:33

got kind of an immediate sell the sell

6:36

the F sell the news but I think there's

6:38

a lot more selling to come even more so

6:41

you you don't think that I mean the idea

6:43

is this institutional allocation might

6:45

leave Bitcoin becoming this next1

6:48

trillion gold-like asset so in other

6:51

words there should be at least a 10 plus

6:52

X in it and with the finite Supply Kathy

6:55

Wood says we're going to 500,000 inner

6:58

bease scenario what's your bare case

7:01

scenario well I mean first of all I mean

7:03

the idea that the institutions are going

7:05

to come and be the bag holders here like

7:08

the the little guy got in years ago and

7:10

now that we built this ETF you're going

7:13

to see Pension funds and endowments and

7:16

you know all the big sophisticated money

7:18

is now going to buy in to this Mania

7:21

right late in the game I I I I just I

7:23

don't see that happening I you know I

7:25

mean could there be some money dumb

7:29

enough to bite at it you know like oh

7:31

I'm going to just buy this because it's

7:33

going up right the

7:34

fomo um it's possible and I'm sure some

7:37

money has flowed in but remember there's

7:39

a lot of money coming out especially

7:41

grayscale I mean people were buying

7:43

grayscale when it was at a 40 50%

7:46

discount to nav to play the eventual

7:50

move to ETF which is now happened so and

7:55

a lot of money is already coming out of

7:56

a grayscale and a lot more money is

7:58

going to come out of grayscale I mean

8:00

even if you want to stay in an ETF why

8:02

would you stay in grayscale at 150 basis

8:05

points when other people are you know a

8:08

fraction of that but you know grayscale

8:11

used to be a big buyer of Bitcoin and

8:14

now they're a seller and it was a

8:16

one-way street right Bitcoin checked in

8:18

but they never checked out because it

8:20

was a closed end fund that's why it was

8:22

trading at a discount well it's not

8:23

going to trade at a discount anymore

8:25

because when people sell they got to

8:27

sell Bitcoin into the market

8:29

so I I think the Dynamics have have

8:32

flipped I think you're going to have a

8:33

lot more Sellers and then eventually I

8:35

think the money that went into these

8:39

ETFs I don't

8:42

believe these are the you know the the

8:46

the Die Hard hoders even though one of

8:49

them has the symbol hodal right one but

8:52

but I think this is more trading

8:54

money I think to the extent that people

8:57

are going to be in the ETFs it may maybe

8:59

people who were trading on coinbase

9:01

which is why I've been saying it's

9:02

negative for coinbase because I think

9:03

some of the day trading is going to

9:06

happen now um in the ETFs versus uh

9:10

directly in you know crypto

9:12

exchanges but I think a lot of the

9:14

people that are buying now are you know

9:16

buying as a trade buying to make money

9:20

and if we start to break down Bitcoin um

9:24

you know maybe cracks 30,000 or whatever

9:26

the key is going to be 20,000 I think

9:29

you could see a lot of people just

9:31

getting out in fact people could put

9:33

stops in on these ETFs you know just

9:35

Market orders like if it dumps get me

9:37

out at the market I don't know how

9:39

Bitcoin is going to handle that I don't

9:42

know what's going to happen when you get

9:44

a bunch of sell orders that hit the

9:46

market and one of the things that's

9:48

happened in the past when you had a lot

9:49

of sell orders with Bitcoin is all of a

9:52

sudden there'd be more tether tether

9:54

would just come out of thin air and buy

9:56

up all that Bitcoin right well if

9:58

they're just counterfeiting tethers and

9:59

they can expand a supply of tethers and

10:02

kind of use it as a like a plunge

10:04

protection and and and buy Bitcoin but

10:07

if people start

10:09

dumping um the

10:11

ETFs you can't there's no tether the

10:14

ETFs need dollars when people redeem the

10:18

sellers need to get dollars they can't

10:19

take tether so all of a sudden you could

10:22

have a lot of Bitcoin dumping on the

10:24

market and only actual dollars would be

10:28

able to buy so you think the ETF is a

10:31

net negative for for Bitcoin I think

10:34

it's going to be I

10:35

think the potential of the ETFs was the

10:39

positive that was the Catalyst hey you

10:42

got to buy it because the ETFs are

10:44

coming you got to get in before the ETFs

10:46

because once the ETFs are here you're

10:48

going to have all this new buying that's

10:50

just like been sitting on the sidelines

10:52

for years and it never made sense to me

10:55

because first of all there were Futures

10:57

ETFs which pretty much the same thing I

10:59

mean same exposure there were lots of

11:03

stocks that were Bitcoin proxies like

11:05

micro strategy like coinbase like some

11:07

of these other stock Michael sailor's

11:09

company right I mean it was essentially

11:11

at one point I think he even called his

11:13

company an ETF I mean obviously it's not

11:16

no one even knows what software they do

11:18

I mean who cares you know you're not buy

11:21

you're not buying micro strategy because

11:22

you like their software business right

11:25

all those guys have sold it anybody who

11:27

is in micro strategy because they they

11:30

like the company they're gone it's all

11:32

you know crypto people that are in it

11:34

now right um plus there are and have

11:37

been spot Bitcoin ETFs in Europe in

11:41

Canada the institutions are not limited

11:44

if you're managing money for a big

11:46

institution there's nothing that stops

11:48

you from trading in Europe nothing that

11:51

stops you from trading in Canada so if

11:52

you wanted to buy a Bitcoin spot ETF

11:56

they were there it's not like yeah you

11:58

know so I think that now that you've got

12:00

these there and there's 11 12 of them

12:03

whatever all right that's it so now what

12:08

now what are you going to do what's the

12:09

next big thing that is going to happen

12:12

that's going to sucker in more buers to

12:15

keep the the Ponzi going um that's it I

12:18

think this this is the end of it there's

12:20

nothing left up your sleeve in crypto

12:22

now that you've got the ETFs and what I

12:24

do think is going to happen and people

12:26

are missing the point you know Gary

12:30

gansler did not want these ETFs but he

12:34

kind of got backed into a legal

12:37

corner but you know before they came out

12:39

he was warning hey this is risky you

12:42

know don't buy I think they're getting

12:45

ready to come out with some more

12:48

regulation on crypto and Bitcoin not

12:51

just from the SEC but the B

12:53

Administration uh you know AML kyc kind

12:57

of stuff that's going to significantly

12:59

increase the cost of trading in crypto

13:03

but I also think they're going to issue

13:04

some warnings to the broker dealer

13:06

Community the invest advisor Community

13:09

like hey we don't want you recommending

13:10

this stuff and if you do recommend it

13:14

and your customer loses and they take

13:16

you to arbitration you are going to lose

13:19

wow so it's going to be like and I know

13:21

how the arbitration and you're I got out

13:23

of Fina I I've never liked this about

13:25

this heads eye win tails you lose

13:27

mentality but it encourages uh customers

13:31

to gamble knowing that they can get

13:33

their money back if they lose and in

13:35

fact one of the reasons that Wall Street

13:38

a lot of the big firms won't take small

13:40

investors right you try to open up an

13:42

account for $10,000

13:43

$225,000 at maril Lynch right you know

13:47

uh Morgan Stanley they they won't let

13:48

you take open the account they won't

13:50

take you and the reason is they say

13:52

those small accounts come with a free

13:53

put and what that means is if the

13:56

investor loses money you have to give it

13:58

back

13:59

because they'll file an arbitration

14:01

there's all these lawyers that'll take

14:03

it on contingency and it costs you 50

14:06

100 grand every time someone sues you

14:08

even if you win so if a guy opens up a

14:10

$10,000 account and loses it and sues

14:13

you for the 10 grand what are you going

14:14

to do fight them no you write them a

14:16

check so they just they won't take the

14:19

accounts because they know it's like a

14:21

casino where you're betting with the

14:23

House's money but that you know one of

14:25

my big critic criticisms of of finra you

14:28

know cu the whole idea Finn was like oh

14:30

we want to we want to help the little

14:33

guy who's not sophisticated he's going

14:34

to get ripped off by these you know

14:38

brokerage firms well thra has made it so

14:42

expensive to be a broker dealer and to

14:45

service the small customer that nobody

14:47

will even work with them so because of

14:50

finra the little guy can't even get

14:52

professional help they end up having to

14:54

do it themselves you know self-directed

14:57

and they're more likely to get scammed

14:59

they're more likely to fall victim to

15:01

fraudsters because the legitimate firms

15:04

refuse to work with them because yeah

15:06

because of the because of the government

15:08

more people get ripped off I mean I wish

15:10

we had no finra wish we had no SEC you

15:13

know the SEC and Fina bless Bernie maid

15:16

off in fact you know they said hey you

15:18

can trust me look the government says

15:20

I'm I'm okay I got the government's uh

15:23

Good Housekeeping seal of approval you

15:24

know I I'd rather have the free market

15:27

if if broker dealers want to join a club

15:30

you know if finer was voluntary I would

15:32

have been all in favor of it but it was

15:35

like you want to be a stock broker you

15:37

you have to be a member so a lot of

15:39

folks say that regulation would help be

15:41

a catalyst towards Bitcoin crypto you

15:45

actually think it's completely the

15:47

opposite yeah you know and and it's

15:49

ironic to see the crypto Community we

15:52

need more regulation we want more

15:54

government no the whole point of it was

15:56

like we don't want government we want to

15:57

get away from that but isn't that like

15:59

an FTX where you have no supervision at

16:01

all and then you get a collapse uh like

16:04

like uh you know yeah well look again

16:06

FTX collapsed the government didn't do

16:08

that the the government didn't do

16:10

anything about FTX until after it

16:12

collapsed you know the Ponzi was the

16:16

original creator of the Ponzi scheme

16:18

right it wasn't it wasn't called Ponzi

16:19

scheme until after Ponzi pulled it off

16:22

but there was no SEC there was no finra

16:26

when Ponzi was around his collapsed in

16:29

less than a year the free market figured

16:31

him out and and collapsed it Bernie

16:34

Midol pulled off his Ponzi scheme for a

16:37

lot longer right under the the nose of

16:40

the SEC and and finra so the free market

16:44

does a much better job of fiing out

16:47

frauders than the government the

16:49

government actually comes in and then

16:52

cozies up with the criminals you know

16:55

and ends up helping perpetuate their

16:58

their crimes because the industry

17:00

captures The Regulators and then ends up

17:02

using The Regulators to stifle

17:04

competition which is what happened I

17:06

mean the reason I initially sold my

17:08

broker dealer that I started in the mid

17:10

90s was it was too expensive to continue

17:13

it I was spending millions and millions

17:14

of dollars a year on

17:17

compliance and when I first started

17:20

compliance was a fraction of the cost so

17:23

I started my own broker dealer but could

17:26

a young Peter Schiff start a broker

17:29

dealer today no way impossible so there

17:32

are a lot fewer broker dealers they've

17:34

gone out of business they've merged

17:36

because they can't handle the regulation

17:39

I mean my bank before the government you

17:41

know conspired with the media to shut it

17:43

down you know and ironically I a media

17:47

falsely accused me of using my bank to

17:49

help people launder money and vade taxes

17:52

I spent millions of dollars a year

17:54

making sure that nobody used my bank

17:57

that was the biggest cost I had 65

17:59

employees of my bank 30 of them worked

18:02

in compliance wow 30 I had one person in

18:05

marketing one so one person to get

18:08

business 30 people to to shut it down

18:11

right to prevent business from happening

18:13

we turn down um like 75% of the account

18:17

applications and and we screened them

18:19

most people wouldn't even apply because

18:21

we had such a a rigorous process we said

18:23

if you're doing this you're doing this

18:25

don't even bother applying you know so

18:27

we we we screened out who could apply

18:29

and then we turned down 75% I mean what

18:31

business wants to turn down 75% of its

18:34

customers it's like but we did it um but

18:38

yeah so I don't even have have that bank

18:40

anymore you know I I sued the media in

18:42

Australia for defamation in one uh but

18:45

you know it doesn't come close to uh

18:47

recouping my losses I'm I'm filing more

18:50

lawsuits over there I didn't sue the New

18:52

York Times but the guy that wrote the

18:54

article I don't know if it was

18:55

defamation but they he definitely lied

18:57

he miss represented the facts in the

19:00

article and and in because the the media

19:02

wanted to create the false impression

19:04

that my bank had lack a customer vetting

19:07

or compliance when we actually had a

19:10

stronger customer vetting than just

19:12

about any Bank in fact one of the guys

19:15

that the uh the only guy that the the

19:18

New York Times Reporter Matthew

19:19

Goldstein cited as evidence that my bank

19:22

had lacks compliance I just dug up a

19:24

YouTube video from 2018 where he's

19:27

actually talking about the very account

19:29

that he opened at my bank that he never

19:31

used he only put in

19:33

£425 and never even used the account so

19:36

it's not like you know he has any

19:37

experience really but it took over three

19:40

weeks to get his account open but the

19:42

guy was talking and I tweeted this out

19:44

or not I posted it on X but I he he says

19:47

you know I opened up the account and my

19:49

God they asked me so many questions I

19:51

wasn't expecting it it was very rigorous

19:53

they needed all this information they

19:54

needed all these forms they asked so

19:56

many questions about the account about

19:58

the the company he said it's a lot

20:00

harder to open a bank account there than

20:01

it was in the UK where it takes one day

20:04

and you just give them like 12 pounds I

20:06

mean he even admitted in fact everybody

20:09

that the reporters in Australia and New

20:11

York interviewed about my bank all the

20:14

former customers former employees

20:16

referral agents everybody said oh my God

20:19

their their compliance was like over the

20:21

top I've never seen anything like it I

20:23

mean the main reason we lost accounts

20:25

was because they couldn't handle the

20:27

compliance because every time you wanted

20:28

to send money out we we put you through

20:30

the ringer so as an entrepreneur why why

20:33

go into banking in the first place a

20:35

broker dealer you know you shouldn't I

20:38

learned that I mean I'll never do it

20:39

again but you know I I saw a niche that

20:42

I wanted to fill I me I was a 100%

20:45

Reserve Bank didn't make any loans my

20:48

bank was you know no customers were at

20:50

risk all these Banks now are in solvant

20:52

in the US because they they loaned out

20:54

money for 30 years they bought mortgages

20:56

and government bonds I didn't do any of

20:58

that I probably had the most solvent

21:00

Bank in the country and of course when

21:03

they shut it down The Regulators claimed

21:05

they were doing so because it was

21:06

insolvent even though I had no debt and

21:09

millions more in cash than than my

21:12

deposits and you know when the the false

21:15

allegations came out in the media in the

21:16

New York Times and in Australia my bank

21:19

at the time had about 270 million in

21:22

deposits by the time they shut it down

21:24

in June of 2022 there was only about 70

21:27

million left so 7 34 of my deposits got

21:32

withdrawn because of all the problems

21:34

that the media

21:35

created we sent them the money how what

21:39

bank could handle a 75% run right

21:42

apparently none of them in March of 2023

21:44

when we had a banking crisis well none

21:46

of them can handle it now I mean they

21:48

only they don't even keep they only keep

21:49

a couple of percent it's fractional

21:51

Reserve so I was able to send back all

21:53

the money but then the government took

21:55

over the bank they've been in control

21:57

for 19 18 months and since they took

22:00

over not a single dime has been returned

22:02

that's F receivership no not FDIC we

22:04

didn't have any FDIC Insurance the local

22:06

Puerto Rican government took it over oh

22:08

wow but the IRS I think is the reason

22:10

that they closed it they came down here

22:12

because they wanted to send a message to

22:14

the world that Puerto Rico wasn't going

22:16

to tolerate money laundering or tax

22:18

evasion because my bank got investigated

22:21

by the US government for two years they

22:24

they they they took hundreds of

22:25

thousands of documents for thousands of

22:27

accounts

22:29

and they found nothing they found not

22:31

only did they find that the bank did

22:33

nothing wrong they've investigated

22:35

thousands of customers and they haven't

22:37

found a single customer that did

22:38

anything wrong anywhere in the world yet

22:41

they made my bank was the target of the

22:45

largest money laundering tax evasion

22:48

investigation in the history of the

22:49

world five governments investigated my

22:52

tiny little bank they probably spent

22:54

more money investigating my bank than

22:57

anybody else I mean one of part of the

22:59

irony of it is you know we mentioned FTX

23:01

Sam bankman freed was running his giant

23:04

fraud out of the Bahamas that's not too

23:07

far from Puerto Rico right they didn't

23:09

do anything to him they were spending

23:11

all their time investigating me well he

23:13

was donating to everyone yeah well he

23:15

was yeah I didn't give any money to any

23:17

Democrats and he was out there virtue

23:18

signaling he was talking about how he

23:21

didn't want any money for himself he was

23:22

just like I just have this one pair of

23:24

tennis shoes and a T-shirt and I live

23:26

with 14 roommates and here's my beat up

23:28

old car right like meanwhile behind the

23:31

scenes is like lifestyles of the Richard

23:33

famous right but you know I'm honest

23:35

about you know what I'm doing so are we

23:38

going to have another banking crisis I

23:39

mean you've got a unique Insight here

23:40

you were in banking and I'm sure I mean

23:43

the banking crisis happened within a

23:45

month of the last time we were here we

23:47

had the bank term funding program that's

23:48

coming to an end here on March 11 so

23:51

they right right we'll see I think that

23:53

needs to be followed up by a rate cut

23:55

right away to hopefully uh prop up uh

23:57

some of those bonds again otherwise

23:58

we'll walk into another banking what do

24:01

you think they're probably going to go

24:02

back to QE you think so look in March of

24:06

last

24:07

year we would have had a worse financial

24:11

crisis than 2008 had the FED not stepped

24:15

up now that doesn't mean they did the

24:17

right thing they did the wrong thing

24:19

they they should have allowed the crisis

24:20

because a worse crisis is going to

24:23

result from the delay and and what

24:26

another worse crisis is ahead of us 2008

24:28

Yes and worse than what March would have

24:30

been last year had we had it in March of

24:32

last year right they they always kicked

24:34

a can down the road because they'd

24:35

rather have a problem tomorrow even if

24:37

it's a bigger problem tomorrow than a

24:40

smaller problem today because then it's

24:42

somebody else's problem right uh but I

24:45

think the banking system is completely

24:49

insolvent in the United States I think

24:52

it is much in much worse shape than it

24:54

was in 2008 when it collapsed

24:58

and usually people will say well yeah

25:01

there's problems but it's not not like

25:03

2008 but they think it's not like 2008

25:07

because it's not as bad it's actually

25:09

not like 2008 because it's much worse

25:12

you know so there there there there's

25:15

two big real estate problems or problems

25:18

the bank has in

25:20

2008 the problem was mortgage loans that

25:24

went into default people stopped paying

25:27

their mortgage

25:28

and the reason this was a problem for

25:30

the banks is because when somebody

25:32

doesn't pay their mortgage well you got

25:34

to sell the house that's the collateral

25:36

for the loan but if you remember back

25:38

then people were making zero down

25:41

loans um and so they didn't have much

25:45

and real estate prices went down so I

25:47

loan somebody 500 Grand to buy a

25:51

house um now the house is worth 300

25:55

Grand the fact that that's happened in

25:57

and of itself is an incentive for the

25:59

borrower not to pay of course walk away

26:02

yeah and especially if they had a teaser

26:04

rate on their mortgage so their mortgage

26:05

started out and the guy was paying maybe

26:07

2,000 a month but now he's paying 3,000

26:11

a month but he only makes you know 2,000

26:13

a whatever he was he was paying a lot of

26:15

money for his mortgage because he

26:17

thought he was going to get rich owning

26:18

a house when it turns out that he went

26:21

broke he's not going to make that

26:23

payment why why why why make payments

26:26

when you're so underwater that sounds

26:28

worse than it is today where you've got

26:29

people locked in at 2 and a half%

26:31

mortgages 30-year no it's not worse it's

26:35

it's worse for the borrower although the

26:39

borrower just walked away if they put it

26:40

down payment they lost it in 2008 they

26:43

just walked but you know you could go

26:44

and rent a place or do something else so

26:47

the problem was when the loan defaulted

26:50

the bank lost and you know when I was a

26:53

CR critical of the um you know

26:57

adjustable rate mortgages and nothing

26:59

down and things like that I never

27:01

criticized it from the point of the

27:04

borrower I always said the borrow was

27:06

smart to put nothing down because then

27:08

you got nothing to lose I mean if

27:09

somebody is dumb enough to let you

27:11

freeroll right Putting a down payment

27:14

was the mistake that the problem with a

27:17

zero down or low down no dock arms was

27:22

the lender the lender was giving

27:25

somebody you know a free BET

27:28

on real estate hey I'm buy this real

27:30

estate if heads I win tails the bank

27:32

loses well it was tails the banks lost

27:35

and and so they lost money and you know

27:36

a lot of banks should have failed and

27:38

unfortunately they got bailed out by by

27:40

the

27:41

government but most mortgages did not

27:44

default it was still a small percentage

27:47

but that was enough to wipe out the bank

27:49

Capital because they didn't have a lot

27:50

of capital it was big pyramid well today

27:55

it's the opposite problem the problem

27:57

isn't the mortgages that default it's

28:00

the ones that are current that keep

28:02

paying because this time real estate

28:05

prices haven't crashed the mortgage

28:08

prices have crashed H so the bond market

28:11

essentially has crashed so the the the

28:13

homeowner doesn't own the mortgage he

28:16

owes the

28:17

mortgage he owns the asset the bank owns

28:21

the mortgage the mortgage has crashed so

28:23

if I loan somebody $500,000 at 3% and

28:27

they don't have to pay me back for 30

28:28

years what's the present value of that

28:31

mortgage oh maybe you know 30 40% half

28:35

so the banks are underwater not on the

28:38

real estate but on the mortgages now the

28:41

borrowers they're going to pay they're

28:43

not going to stop paying on these

28:45

sweetheart Deals they got

28:47

3% right they're going to they're going

28:49

to they're going to take that mortgage

28:50

to the

28:51

grave and um it's the only thing that's

28:54

not going up right everything the price

28:57

is if everything is going up except your

28:58

mortgage right so it's the the mortgage

29:02

is the homeowner's biggest asset it's

29:04

the bank's biggest liability so the

29:06

banks are losing money on every mortgage

29:08

and the homeowners aren't going

29:10

anywhere um and they they even if they

29:13

wanted to they can't they can't sell

29:15

because they can't buy anything else

29:17

because they can't get that mortgage the

29:18

mortgage is ortable they can't take the

29:20

mortgage from one house and move it to

29:23

another house and the buyer of their

29:24

house can't even assume that mortgage so

29:26

they're stuck there right so the real

29:29

estate Market's not moving houses aren't

29:31

for sale so home prices are still high

29:33

no one could afford to buy because the

29:35

price is structured for 3% mortgages and

29:38

they're 7% so the housing market is dead

29:41

but so the banks have lost a ton of

29:43

money but it's not just mortgages they

29:45

bought they bought treasuries and things

29:47

like that so they're way underwater

29:48

that's why the banks can't afford to pay

29:50

interest go to your bank and say hey how

29:52

much interest can I get well I can't get

29:55

anything oh then I want my money I'm

29:56

taking my money out of your bank I'm

29:58

going to put it in a money market where

30:00

I can get

30:01

5% right that's the crowding out

30:03

everybody's loaning money to the

30:04

government the banks don't have any

30:05

money that's why the banks had to go to

30:07

the FED why did the banks need money

30:09

because the Depo depositors wanted their

30:11

money and the banks didn't have it well

30:13

they still don't have it because they

30:14

gave it to the customers how are they

30:16

going to repay these loans in March all

30:18

any that's why I think they're going to

30:20

extend this program so you think uh this

30:24

uh this the only way essentially the

30:26

Ponzi keeps going is If the Fed extends

30:28

the bank term funding program and if

30:30

they don't and they call these $160

30:32

billion of loans due will have banking

30:36

crisis 2.0 what does that do for the

30:38

consumer exactly exactly and but also

30:40

depositors if the if the FED doesn't

30:42

extend

30:43

this that's going to create a bigger run

30:46

on the

30:47

banks because you're going to have to

30:50

take your money out of a bank if you're

30:51

worried it's going to fail because the

30:53

FDIC only goes to what 100 250,000 now

30:56

what is it you know so if you've got a

30:58

lot of money to bank you're not going to

30:59

leave it there you're going to take it

31:00

out and put it in one of the two big to

31:02

fail Banks so any bank that's not too

31:04

big to fail is going to fail that's

31:06

another example of where the government

31:08

comes in and and distorts the market

31:11

because they give a comparative

31:12

advantage to the bigger Banks uh but the

31:15

other thing I wanted to point out about

31:17

why the banks are insolvent particularly

31:19

a lot of the regional Banks it's not

31:21

just a Residential Mortgage book it's

31:24

commercial and Commercial is a different

31:28

problem commercial is more like 2008

31:31

where it's the default problem and the

31:34

collapse of commercial real estate

31:37

values because when people bought a lot

31:41

of this commercial real estate interest

31:43

rates are at zero and Commercial Real

31:47

Estate is like a bond it trades at a cap

31:49

rate and the lower interest rates are

31:52

the more commercial real estate is worth

31:55

because what investors just do is they

31:57

look at the income right and they

32:00

compare it well I can buy this piece of

32:02

property and collect rent or I can buy

32:04

this Bond and and clip coupons so it's

32:07

you know it's the interest rate

32:09

determines the value of the commercial

32:11

real estate so when interest rates were

32:13

at

32:14

zero um and and you had rental streams

32:17

from property commercial property prices

32:20

went way up and that was also helpful

32:23

because in 2008 when the banks were

32:25

losing money on on their uh residential

32:29

loans they weren't losing any money on

32:30

their commercial loans because

32:31

commercial real estate went up and

32:33

everybody paid but now what's happened

32:36

well you had covid and that started the

32:39

work from home craze so a lot of office

32:44

space is

32:45

empty you also had the

32:48

bankruptcy of um what's that company um

32:54

the the banks sorry no no no the the

32:56

company that that rented out all this

32:57

office space Oh we work again for the

33:00

second time we work yeah so now you have

33:03

all this we work space right we work

33:05

didn't that was my joke always always

33:07

about it but uh but now you have all

33:09

that space on the market right they were

33:11

some of the biggest tenants in the major

33:13

major markets in the country uh that

33:16

space is up for up for sale interest

33:19

rates have risen a lot so that's also

33:21

brought down real estate but the rents

33:24

have collapsed because the properties

33:26

are offices are vacant then you also

33:29

have uh shopping centers malls that are

33:32

half empty why well not only are people

33:35

working from home they're shopping from

33:37

home uh and they're shopping less

33:39

because they're spending all their money

33:40

on food on on rent on utilities on a

33:44

healthcare they don't have as much money

33:46

left over for you know things that you

33:48

know restaurants or or you know or or or

33:51

stores you know that they would just go

33:53

and and buy buy things that they don't

33:55

really need just stuff that they you

33:56

know they like liked so you have all

33:59

these vacancies that have collapsed the

34:01

income so commercial real estate prices

34:03

you look at most markets they're down

34:04

30% 40% 50% and in some cities you know

34:09

where the crime has exploded ever since

34:12

uh you know we had the black lives

34:14

matter protest with um um uh uh chovin

34:20

and George Floyd and all that stuff when

34:22

you know all the police just stopped

34:24

enforcing the laws and they stopped lock

34:26

lock up the

34:28

shoplifters um insurance rates have gone

34:30

through the roof losses due to theft so

34:33

stores are shutting down and a lot of uh

34:37

uh employers don't even want their

34:39

workers coming to work they're afraid so

34:41

what do you think how does this manifest

34:43

like well this so this this these are

34:44

huge losses for the banks because the

34:47

owners of this commercial real estate

34:49

when you borrowed let's say you borrowed

34:52

$200 million from a bank to buy a piece

34:55

of property and and that property is now

34:57

worth $100 million and your loan was 7

35:01

years and now it comes due and when you

35:03

borrowed the money you were paying you

35:05

know 4% and now they want 10 I mean

35:09

what's the odds that you're going to you

35:10

know even want to stay in no you're

35:12

going to mail in the keys you're going

35:13

to give the bank back the

35:16

building better give them a $100 million

35:19

building than a $200 million cash so the

35:22

banks are looking at massive losses on

35:25

their commercial real estate

35:27

at the same time they have massive

35:29

losses on all their Residential

35:31

Mortgages and and government bonds so

35:35

the whole banking system is completely

35:38

insolvent and the FED hasn't even raised

35:42

rates anywhere near high enough to get

35:44

rid of inflation we we actually need

35:47

much higher rates than than where the

35:48

FED stopped and not only do we need the

35:52

FED to tighten more oh I forgot I had my

35:55

phone it's all right turn that off so

35:58

how let me finish this but not only not

36:00

only do we need the

36:02

FED not only do we need the FED to

36:04

tighten more we need the government to

36:07

tighten because you need contractionary

36:11

fiscal policy as well as monetary policy

36:15

right you can't have one without the

36:17

other because the engine of inflation is

36:21

the government spending more than it

36:22

collects in taxes because you're you're

36:25

you're putting artificial into the

36:27

economy now it's worse when it's

36:29

monetized by the FED when the FED is

36:32

printing the money to buy the bonds that

36:34

facilitates this extra spending but

36:38

budget deficits are still 2 trillion

36:40

plus per year that's stimulative policy

36:43

and also look at the credit

36:46

markets Consumer Debt is at an all-time

36:49

record high credit card debt is at an

36:51

all-time record high household debt the

36:53

savings rate continues to plunge every

36:56

everybody keeps spending well that's the

36:59

fuel for the

37:00

inflation what the FED needs to do to

37:03

put this inflation Genie that it let out

37:05

of the bottle on purpose right it's not

37:07

like this happened out of left field not

37:09

only do they have to contract a money

37:11

supply which is growing again rather

37:13

rapidly but they have to contract credit

37:16

and they have to change uh people's

37:19

behavior they have to increase savings

37:21

and reduce consumption and spending

37:24

that's how you fight inflation but we

37:25

haven't done that at all

37:27

and if you go back to the very

37:29

definition of inflation which is an

37:30

expansion of the supply of money it also

37:33

includes credit inflation is an

37:35

expansion of the supply of money and the

37:37

supply of credit so credit expansion is

37:40

inflationary and we've had credit

37:42

expanding the entire time that the Fed

37:45

was fighting inflation which means the

37:48

fight has been inadequate now why is

37:50

inflation come down the way they measure

37:52

it it was 9% now it's 3% well again

37:56

nothing goes in a straight line right so

37:58

maybe it goes nine then it goes three

38:00

and the next move is 12 right it's just

38:02

in a wave up the trend is is higher

38:05

right you'd want to buy the dip in

38:07

inflation right if you're looking at

38:08

that but the main reason inflation came

38:11

down was the market anticipated all the

38:14

rate hikes and that strengthened the

38:16

dollar the dollar Index Rose about

38:19

30% and uh in that environment brought

38:22

down oil prices commodity prices and the

38:25

strong dollar put a l on import prices

38:28

so that helped we also had a small

38:30

contraction in the money supply after a

38:32

major expansion but through QT then eh

38:36

quantitative tightening yeah which is

38:37

now pretty much ending the fed's rate

38:40

hikes are over so now the markets are

38:42

starting to look at the Great Cuts which

38:44

is going to weaken the dollar so

38:47

ironically the FED says Hey we've won

38:49

our inflation fight we can cut rates by

38:52

indicating that inflation is going to

38:54

come roaring back because that brings

38:56

down the the dollar right it's actually

38:58

loosening the financial conditions but I

39:01

think the dollar is turning I think it's

39:03

top it's getting ready to fall

39:04

Commodities have bottomed oil is

39:06

bottomed uh we're going to start to see

39:09

a a big move up and the FED is in a box

39:13

now because it's promised the market

39:15

rate cuts it can't you know pull the rug

39:16

out from under it but when inflation

39:19

really surprises the thing that's going

39:21

to be a big problem is we're going to be

39:22

in a recession fact we're probably in a

39:25

recession right now now you know that I

39:28

know the economic data doesn't say that

39:30

you know we just got this you know big

39:32

GDP number right 3.3% unemployment is

39:35

really low but they were saying the same

39:38

thing in the summer of 2008 they were

39:40

saying we're not going to have a

39:42

recession even though they were in one

39:44

it's just that the government data

39:46

didn't recognize the Great Recession

39:49

that started in December of 2007 they

39:52

didn't recognize it until December of

39:54

2008 so the government in December of

39:57

2008 came out and said you know what all

40:00

the economic data we released for the

40:02

last year was wrong all the good data

40:06

was actually bad data we've been in a

40:07

recession the whole time and they went

40:09

and revised down everything so they

40:11

could just as easily do the same thing

40:13

now they could come back and say you

40:15

know what you know all those good

40:16

numbers that we gave you all those jobs

40:18

that we said were created they actually

40:20

weren't created we actually lost

40:21

millions of jobs and you know all that

40:23

economic growth that we said was there

40:25

actually we we were in recession the

40:26

whole time they could easily come back

40:28

and do that and I think it's it's likely

40:30

that they will and I think that the

40:33

reason that Joe Biden is so unpopular I

40:37

mean it's unprecedented how unpopular

40:41

but nobody has ever been less popular

40:45

and the same thing with KLA Harris she's

40:47

the most unpopular vice president ever

40:50

why what does she do I mean I I don't

40:52

know I could you name anything she

40:54

stands for anything she's done that

40:56

would would justify this degree of

40:59

unpopularity I think it's just the

41:02

voters taking out their frustration on

41:04

how bad the economy is the economy

41:07

stinks and the American electorate tends

41:10

to either blame or credit so if the

41:13

economy is bad the White House gets

41:16

credit I mean if the economy is good the

41:18

White House gets credit if the economy

41:21

is bad they get to blame whether it's

41:23

their fault or not the voters are just

41:25

going to vote their pocketbooks remember

41:27

Henry uh Carville it's the economy

41:30

stupid well if you want to know why

41:32

Biden is so unpopular it's the economy

41:35

stupid right so the econom is bad so the

41:37

media keeps saying there's a disconnect

41:40

between the the

41:42

voters and the economy no the disconnect

41:45

is between the data and the economy the

41:48

voters have got it right the economy is

41:51

awful wow so why not keep uh or

41:54

potentially as the fed the the Ponzi

41:56

going so to speak If the Fed starts

41:58

lowering rates or at least signaling

42:00

that rates come down now losses at Banks

42:02

start evaporating start reducing the

42:05

cost of borrowing maybe start reducing

42:07

some of those credit defaults which you

42:09

mentioned debt and and delinquencies are

42:11

higher now than where they were before

42:14

covid so it does seem like there's some

42:16

unsustainability with the spending even

42:19

just this morning we saw once again

42:20

Lower inflation and pce numbers yet uh

42:23

higher spending so it seems like the FED

42:28

should be in this position of cutting is

42:30

it just your position that that will

42:31

create substantial inflation again or uh

42:35

can we uh can we bail out the banks that

42:37

way and remember that spending was

42:40

financed in large part by a depletion of

42:42

savings which are already low so it's

42:45

more debt it's more credit but there's a

42:48

reason that Ponzi schemes are illegal

42:51

and and and that's because they can't

42:53

continue indefinitely they always fall

42:55

apart so there's always people holding

42:58

the bag that end up losing money uh and

43:02

so no they can't keep the Ponzi going

43:04

indefinitely because it's a Ponzi by

43:06

definition now governments can generally

43:08

get away with it a lot longer than you

43:11

and I could uh because they they protect

43:13

themselves they kind of write the rules

43:15

but they can't you know suspend the

43:18

rules

43:19

indefinitely uh and and the reason I

43:21

think they can't really get away with it

43:24

anymore is the way they've gotten away

43:26

with it in the past is by creating

43:29

inflation that's how they they do it

43:32

right quantitative easing is inflation

43:35

by definition it's just a better name

43:37

it's a euphan ISM because if the

43:39

government said our policy is to create

43:43

inflation people would well I don't like

43:46

that I don't like inflation that makes

43:48

prices go up so if they just call it

43:50

quantitative easing they don't get a lot

43:53

of enemies although in Europe they were

43:55

even more abrupt they kept saying you

43:57

know or even here we need more inflation

43:59

you know that was they actually told us

44:01

that they said the problem is we don't

44:02

have enough inflation like we have a lot

44:04

of problems that was not one of them

44:06

lack of inflation is not your problem

44:08

but the government said it was and they

44:10

had to solve it by creating more

44:11

inflation so that's what they did every

44:13

time we had a problem they created

44:15

inflation to solve it but they've

44:18

created so much inflation at this point

44:20

that inflation is now the biggest

44:22

problem and how do you solve the

44:25

inflation problem with more inflation

44:27

you don't so when we get the next

44:30

economic

44:31

downturn when it's going to happen in an

44:35

environment where you still have high

44:36

inflation right it's not going to be 2%

44:39

or any you know close to

44:41

it now let's you know inflation is let's

44:44

say four 5% whatever it is and

44:47

unemployment really spikes the banks

44:48

start to fail and they print a bunch

44:50

more money and now you take that

44:51

inflation rate and send it right into

44:53

the double

44:54

digits that's it I mean you're

44:56

the dollar crashes I mean the bonds

44:58

crash you know cuz the bond market

45:00

remember you look at that chart of the

45:02

bond market all the time the FED has

45:05

been doing these policies we've been in

45:07

this secular bull market for bonds which

45:10

started in 1980 81 and ended in 2020 so

45:14

you had a 40-year bull market in bonds

45:18

which is now the beginning of a bare

45:20

Market which who knows how long it's

45:22

going to last it's going to be brutal

45:24

it's going to be around for a long time

45:27

so now if the FED is going to try QE in

45:29

a bond bear I don't think it's going to

45:31

work I think the next time the FED

45:34

prints money to buy bonds bonds are

45:37

going to go down and not and of course

45:41

what are really going to go down are not

45:43

just treasuries but the bonds that the

45:45

FED is not buying because treasury

45:48

buying of you know the FED buying of

45:50

treasuries will will offset some of the

45:53

decline it should pump up prices right

45:55

but but they're not going to buy all the

45:57

treasury so other people would be

45:58

selling but what about the mun bonds

46:01

who's going to buy them what about

46:02

corporate bonds you know as you know

46:05

rates are going to Surge across the

46:07

Spectrum but nobody could afford to pay

46:09

I mean just look at the national debt

46:11

this is where it's it screams at you the

46:13

national debt is 34

46:15

trillion it's growing by a trillion a

46:19

quarter in calendar

46:22

2024 something like 12 trillion of that

46:25

shes has to be rolled

46:28

over in addition to the 4 trillion of

46:31

new bar that's 16 trillion who's going

46:33

to buy that right now the FED is selling

46:36

fed's adding to the problem you know who

46:38

else is selling Social Security they

46:41

were one of the biggest buyers of

46:42

treasuries during that bull market

46:44

they're now one of the biggest sellers

46:47

because Social Security because so many

46:49

people have dropped out of the labor

46:51

force or retired Social Security doesn't

46:54

collect enough money in payroll tax

46:55

taxes to cover the cost of the benefits

46:57

of the people who are already retired

47:00

not to mention the ones who are going to

47:01

retire next week or next month so

47:04

they're selling treasuries the other big

47:06

buyer of treasuries were foreigners

47:09

Japan China you know they're not buying

47:13

I mean that they're selling too uh so

47:16

this is a huge problem there a it's a

47:18

huge bond market B you think there'll be

47:20

a lack of buyers and as they return to

47:25

QE and increase the supply substantially

47:27

of bonds there won't be enough Bond

47:30

buyers there already isn't enough Bond

47:31

buyers that's why Skyrocket again that's

47:33

why they're going to go back to QE and

47:35

again the other point interest on the

47:37

national debt is about now the same as

47:40

National

47:42

Defense a year ago it was nothing it was

47:45

two or 300 billion a year now it's

47:46

almost a

47:48

trillion in another year or two interest

47:51

on the national debt if interest rates

47:53

just stay where they are right don't go

47:55

higher which they could do they just

47:57

stay where they are interest will be

47:59

more than Social Security or Medicare

48:01

it'll be the single biggest expense in a

48:05

couple of years about 50% of every

48:09

dollar the US government collects in

48:11

taxes income taxes Social Security taxes

48:15

50 cents of every dollar will be needed

48:17

just to pay the interest on the debt not

48:20

pay back any of the debt just the

48:22

interest on the debt and before the end

48:25

of this

48:26

decade assuming that we can get there

48:29

without a crisis which I I don't think

48:30

is possible do you think it's imminent

48:32

oh yeah well it's it's been imminent for

48:34

a while but before the end of the decade

48:37

which is not that far

48:39

away

48:40

100% of government tax revenues will be

48:43

for interest on the dead now obviously

48:47

that circumstances can't exist you can't

48:50

have a government that simply transfers

48:53

money to bond holders and has nothing

48:55

left over for anything else I'm not

48:57

talking about I mean not even to pay the

48:59

salaries of the the people that that

49:01

that clean the toilets in the capital I

49:03

mean nothing no money for anything

49:06

except interest on the debt so this is

49:09

how much this thing is ballooned out of

49:12

proportion you know even Janet Yellen

49:13

you know a year ago or a year and a half

49:16

ago when she was asked if she was

49:18

worried about the $30 trillion debt she

49:20

said no the debt didn't matter as long

49:22

as the interest payments were low that's

49:24

what she said I remember at the time

49:25

saying well doesn't she realize that

49:27

those interest payments aren't fixed the

49:29

FED is going to be raising rates you

49:31

know I'm only worried about it when

49:33

interest rates go up well then you

49:34

should worry about it now because

49:36

interest rates are going to go up but

49:37

this is why the FED is going to stop

49:39

cutting rates it's not because it's one

49:41

it's battle against inflation it's lost

49:43

it's going to surrender it's cutting

49:45

rates because nobody can afford to pay

49:48

it's going to cut rates to prevent

49:50

default

49:51

insolvency right but that's going to

49:53

lead to Runaway inflation could your Sun

49:55

be right where artificial intelligence

49:58

expands GDP so much that that our debt

50:00

just doesn't matter anymore and

50:02

everything's great and there's no

50:03

recession what what are the odds of us

50:05

being able to escape massive pain and

50:08

you mentioned it yourself layoffs and

50:10

unemployment which is obviously a

50:12

lagging indicator yeah I mean obviously

50:14

I mean my son thinks the odds are High

50:16

um I don't know why he's he's that

50:19

confident but I think the odds are very

50:22

low I mean look

50:24

obviously if if

50:27

AI you know leads to such an

50:31

enormous uh increase in

50:34

productivity I mean in theory right if I

50:37

everybody can have their own a AI that

50:40

was so super intelligent that it can

50:44

conjure up anything you need almost like

50:46

you remember Barbara Eden from I dream e

50:47

genie right whatever Tony Nelson wanted

50:50

she just blinked and he could have it

50:51

right well if AI could do that oh I'd

50:54

like a brand new car and the AI just

50:56

creates it from the molecules in the air

50:58

you know it creates your food it it

51:01

gives you everything you need and you

51:02

don't nobody have well sure no one no

51:04

one needs anything I mean we don't need

51:07

money right the problem isn't money it's

51:10

stuff we need things right we need food

51:15

we need shelter we need clothing we need

51:19

entertainment um um you know there are a

51:21

lot of things that we need and we can't

51:24

have them unless we produce them right

51:26

we don't have to produce them ourselves

51:27

somebody has to produce them and we have

51:29

to do something of value to exchange

51:32

with the productive people so that we

51:33

can have things

51:35

but if nobody needed to work if we could

51:39

if we could just have all the things

51:41

without having to do the work well then

51:43

the problems are over right we we don't

51:44

need anything uh and then it doesn't

51:46

matter about you know any of this right

51:48

you just put your goggles on and get

51:50

your stimulus check and you don't need a

51:52

stimulus check you you know your goggles

51:54

give you whatever you want right you the

51:56

AI is so super intelligent that it's

51:58

almost like a god it has harnessed the

52:01

the powers of the universe the force

52:04

right I mean this is like the ultimate

52:05

where it can just give you what you want

52:08

you don't have to work to earn something

52:10

and of course government see people

52:12

think governments give them things

52:13

government doesn't have anything it has

52:15

to take it first it has to take it from

52:17

somebody who produced it to give it to

52:19

somebody who didn't but in the world of

52:22

you know all powerful AI everybody can

52:24

have everything you know because you're

52:26

every AI so obviously you know we're not

52:29

going to be there but to the extent that

52:32

look if if if a if a factory can you

52:36

know get rid of a 100 workers and

52:38

replace it with you know an AI chip or

52:40

whatever it's a computer chip an Elon

52:41

robot um then you know we you know

52:45

production productivity goes up you know

52:48

if if if we could have a much more

52:49

efficient Health Care system because all

52:51

the doctors are robots and they diagnose

52:54

you immediately or they they figure out

52:56

a cure so you don't even need an

52:57

operation they're so super smart that

52:59

they just here take this pill it'll cure

53:02

everything that you have right all our

53:03

health care costs go down you know I

53:05

mean so yes I mean you could say that we

53:08

could get a get out of jail free card

53:10

from this productivity

53:12

Miracle um but look you know I think

53:17

that there is a lot of potential in Ai

53:20

and it may take many more years or

53:23

decades for it to fully

53:26

uh develop and in the meantime you know

53:30

to the extent that AI

53:33

does uh eliminate uh the need for

53:38

workers the way governments are set up

53:42

today those workers just might

53:44

immediately start getting government

53:45

money it's not like they're going to do

53:47

something else that's valuable they're

53:49

just going to start collecting

53:50

government money uh and that's more

53:53

inflation and also you know the these

53:55

programs like Social Security and

53:57

Medicare they depend on people working

53:59

for a paycheck if I replace my workers

54:01

with a robot there's no more

54:04

FICA right because you know and so the

54:07

government loses a lot of that tax

54:09

revenue and if they start spending money

54:11

because they're they're giving everybody

54:13

like a stimulus check because they no

54:15

longer have a job so in the short run

54:18

there could be a a a negative to the AI

54:22

not because of capitalism but because of

54:25

government because of because of

54:27

socialism um but you know the other

54:30

thing is that AI is not just in the

54:33

America it's all over the

54:34

world and you know to the extent that

54:38

the world is a lot better off then you

54:40

know that could be a negative for the us

54:42

because we kind of depend on everybody

54:43

else being in trouble because they buy

54:46

the dollar like as as a safe haven

54:48

people are worried about Europe they're

54:49

worried about Japan and when they they

54:51

buy the dollar so we're the best of the

54:53

worst so to speak so people buy the doar

54:55

perception of that right so if things

54:56

get better hey they don't need they

54:58

don't need

55:00

it but also you

55:02

know America is uniquely vulnerable

55:07

because of the Dollar's status I mean we

55:11

it's like you know you live by the sword

55:13

you die by the sword I mean the dollar

55:16

status is the source of our standard of

55:21

living right so right now we we benefit

55:24

from the doar being the reserve

55:26

currency because we don't have to work

55:28

as hard as everybody else we don't have

55:30

to produce because we could print money

55:33

instead and we can exchange that money

55:35

with for the stuff everybody else

55:37

produces because everybody wants our

55:39

dollars because they're the reserve

55:40

currency not because you could do

55:41

anything with them um you know we have

55:44

huge trade deficits you know trillion

55:45

dollars a year so the source of our

55:49

strength is actually going to be our

55:51

undoing uh because once we lose that

55:54

privilege

55:55

the whole economy collapses because

55:57

we've built it on the foundation of that

56:01

privilege being there we have this

56:03

service sector economy right where

56:04

everybody is in the service sector well

56:07

that's only possible because we don't

56:08

have to manufacture as much because we

56:10

can rely on China or other countries to

56:13

manufacture for us because they need our

56:16

paper money but if they don't need it

56:18

anymore because the dollar has been

56:20

demonetized as a reserve currency

56:22

because we've created too many of them

56:23

we've created too much inflation because

56:25

we have too much debt now we can't

56:28

import anymore without exporting and so

56:31

now the economy doesn't work I mean

56:33

imagine a Walmart with no with no

56:36

nothing on the shelves I mean so all

56:39

those workers at the store are going to

56:41

lose their jobs if there's nothing to

56:43

buy right those jobs are predicated on

56:47

their being stuff on the

56:49

shelves and and a lot of the service

56:51

sector economy is is predicated on

56:55

you already having stuff you know that

56:57

you bought but if you don't have the

56:59

manufacturing if you don't have the

57:01

actual Goods then you can't afford the

57:03

services and the whole thing is going to

57:05

just implode so the economies on the

57:08

verg collapse the dollar crashes I guess

57:10

two things to ask is what can I as an

57:12

individual do to protect myself and then

57:14

beyond that Beyond just me covering my

57:15

ass like what can we as a society do to

57:18

kind of remove ourselves from this

57:19

centralized government and this

57:20

impending doom yeah well I've been

57:23

trying to help people protect themselves

57:26

from this crisis for a long time and

57:30

because we haven't had the crisis people

57:32

think well shift's wrong right he's

57:34

preparing for you know this crisis

57:36

that's never going to happen no I'm

57:38

preparing for a crisis that is going to

57:40

happen it's just happening

57:43

later um but all

57:46

of the the

57:49

things that make the crisis inevitable

57:53

all those problems

57:55

not only still exist but they're they're

57:58

bigger so the crisis looms even larger

58:02

than it did a decade ago you know um

58:06

we've just blown a bigger bubble but

58:08

while we've you know kicked a can down

58:10

the road all these problems have gotten

58:11

so much worse and so what this means is

58:14

that we have the crisis it's going to be

58:17

much deeper because we've dug ourselves

58:19

into a bigger hole now again maybe AI

58:22

could soften the blow you know anything

58:25

that that that the free market could do

58:28

uh to counteract the damage that

58:29

government does I mean that's basically

58:31

the dance that we do capitalism is a

58:34

positive Force for good uh the free

58:37

market which is constantly finding ways

58:40

to increase abundance uh make things

58:44

better make things cheaper increase

58:47

living standards and then you have

58:48

governments that are working at the

58:50

exact opposite purp purpose they're

58:52

trying to undermine productivity they're

58:54

trying to add unnecessary burdens and

58:57

regulations and red type they're trying

58:59

to counteract the benevolent forces of

59:02

the free market that want to allocate

59:05

resources and labor to their highest and

59:06

best use politicians want to allocate

59:09

them to their friends sure whoever's

59:11

going to give them the the most

59:13

donations so FTX yeah so government

59:16

government is acting and then you have

59:18

the free market that is trying to lower

59:20

prices and the government that creates

59:22

inflation to push them up uh you know so

59:25

whatever the government the the free

59:27

market can do to undo the damage of

59:29

government but you can only imagine the

59:31

world that we would live in today if

59:34

Government had stayed at the same size

59:36

it was in 1900 you know had we never had

59:40

an income tax have we never had a social

59:42

security have we never had a Federal

59:44

Reserve had the government stayed the

59:47

same size it was in 1900 which was less

59:50

than 5% of our GDP had we had no

59:53

government borrowing right imagine

59:55

imagine the world that we would live in

59:58

would even recogn I mean would we have

60:01

less control of domestic policies uh

60:05

International policies uh you know the

60:07

idea of government is they're here to

60:09

protect us Peter who would protect us if

60:11

the government wasn't as massively large

60:14

as it is like I said with my bank you

60:16

know every customer could have taken out

60:18

all their money and then the government

60:20

came in to protect them and now no one

60:21

gets any money for almost two years no

60:24

one's gotten their money now that they

60:25

have government protection when when I

60:27

was protecting them in the free market

60:29

everybody had access to all their money

60:31

at all the time but no what the world

60:34

would look like look I I think that had

60:37

the government not get involv gotten

60:40

involved I think that you know the

60:43

typical family

60:45

today um would have one bread

60:49

winner most likely the man but it could

60:52

be the woman but you wouldn't have a

60:54

husband and wife both having

60:56

jobs uh people wouldn't be Moonlighting

60:58

you wouldn't have people with two or

60:59

three jobs my guess is by now we'd

61:03

probably be down to maybe three or four

61:05

days a week working so the weekends

61:07

would probably be maybe four four days

61:09

long five days long uh we'd be so much

61:11

more productive we'd have a much higher

61:13

standard of living God knows what

61:15

inventions we would have come up with uh

61:17

what drugs we would have come up with

61:19

you know without the FDA you know uh you

61:21

know screwing all that up I mean we

61:23

maybe we would have cancer by now who

61:25

knows right where we maybe we would have

61:27

developed AI a decade two ago I don't

61:29

know but I know I used to watch The

61:32

Jetsons when I was a kid did you ever

61:33

see that show so yeah they The Jetsons

61:37

came out in the 60s and they just

61:39

assumed that you know we would just keep

61:42

expanding the way we were back then you

61:44

know um but I think George Jetson worked

61:48

two days a week he was complaining about

61:50

these two-day work weeks are killing me

61:52

and he was say look at my button pushing

61:53

I had to push the button four times

61:55

yesterday like that's all he did right

61:57

it was his job um he worked at this

61:59

place spacely sprockets right they made

62:02

sprocket so who the hell knows what a

62:03

sprocket is right it's was like a widget

62:05

a sprocket uh but I think it would be

62:07

something like that I mean maybe we

62:08

wouldn't be flying around in you know

62:10

the flying cars but we would all be

62:12

working a lot less we would have a much

62:14

higher standard of

62:16

living uh than we do now you know and if

62:19

you look at you know America relative to

62:22

the rest of the world Americans had a

62:24

standard of living in 1940

62:26

1950 that was unrivaled there was

62:29

nothing like America we I mean American

62:31

capitalism created the middle class

62:33

which didn't exist in Europe I mean

62:35

Americans used to go to Europe and there

62:38

was an expression the Ugly American and

62:41

the reason that we were ugly is because

62:43

Americans would go there and all of a

62:44

sudden they'd be rich because everything

62:46

was so cheap there and so we would act

62:48

kind of arrogant when we were there just

62:50

you know not on purpose um but you know

62:54

I mean

62:55

everybody was rich when they went to

62:57

Europe because it was they were poor in

62:59

comparison to America's middle class uh

63:03

but today Americans don't live that much

63:06

better than the rest of the world in

63:07

fact there are a lot of countries that

63:08

have higher standard of livings than

63:11

America uh and and the only reason our

63:13

standard living isn't much lower is

63:14

because of all this debt but that just

63:16

means that in the future it's you know

63:18

our standard of living is is going to

63:20

come way down when this bubble bursts

63:23

and we can't

63:25

uh live beyond our means anymore do you

63:27

think the wealth Gap is just going to

63:29

widen or will there be some great reset

63:31

that gives everybody that opportunity to

63:34

you know help reduce the size of

63:35

government and get back to a normal

63:37

playing field yeah I mean the wealth Gap

63:39

I think is going to continue to widen as

63:43

a result of the fed and government

63:44

policy remember the biggest wealth Gap

63:47

is in Socialism or communism right you

63:50

have a few people who work for the

63:51

government that have all the wealth and

63:53

everybody else else is in abject poverty

63:56

right and yeah there are a few people

63:58

that are connected to the government

63:59

that that manage to get some get

64:01

something capitalism is the great

64:03

equalizer you know that's what uh

64:06

Narrows the Gap and it creates a lot of

64:08

wealth now you're going to have some

64:11

very rich people in capitalism but they

64:13

earn it because in capitalism you're

64:16

rewarded in proportion to your

64:19

contribution the more you benefit

64:21

Society the more money you earn because

64:24

that's what profit is profit is the gain

64:27

that's derived from doing good right if

64:30

if you're able to uh combine the the

64:34

resources in the economy that are scarce

64:36

right everybody the resources are scarce

64:37

so if you're going to use these

64:39

resources you need to use them

64:40

efficiently and if you can take these

64:42

resources and create products and and

64:47

services that people value more than the

64:50

resources it took to create them you get

64:52

rich because people buy what you have to

64:55

sell but a capitalist can't force

64:59

somebody to buy anything they have to

65:01

voluntarily do it people make a choice I

65:04

want to own that I want to buy that

65:06

because it's going to make my life

65:07

better and I'm going to give money to

65:09

the company that made my life better so

65:12

the more money you collect the more

65:14

people's lives that you've improved

65:15

that's the Invisible Hand of capitalism

65:18

and that's that's the beauty of the

65:19

system but yes I mean there are going to

65:21

be people that work harder that are

65:24

smarter and do more good and they're

65:26

going to achieve more wealth but you

65:28

always have people who become envious of

65:30

other people and the

65:33

politicians play on that Envy right and

65:36

they say these people are rich that's

65:38

not fair you should have more money vote

65:40

for me and I'll steal their money and

65:41

give it to you right because you're more

65:43

deserving you're more caring because

65:45

they have their money because they're

65:46

greedy right you know they're you know

65:49

they're just they're just ripping people

65:50

off and exploiting their workers right

65:52

that that that's what they tell you to

65:53

get get they get they get the votes and

65:55

people yes the reason I'm not rich is

65:57

because I'm a good guy I don't exploit

65:59

people I'm not Cutthroat in evil right

66:02

like those rich people are right because

66:04

that's a way to kind of L you know

66:06

justify the fact that you're not rich

66:08

instead of saying I'm not rich because I

66:10

don't work as hard I'm not ambitious I'm

66:12

not as smart right that's why you're not

66:14

rich on that note uh Brett Whitten over

66:17

from Arin vest I know you love Arin vest

66:19

and Kathy over there slightly different

66:22

opinions uh but uh they argue that

66:25

there's a chance the Federal Reserve

66:27

might be biased in cutting interest

66:29

rates substantially maybe even before

66:31

the election to preserve the stability

66:33

of the Dollar by preventing potentially

66:36

a trump election and keeping their jobs

66:38

what's your take on that well I agree

66:42

with the idea that the

66:43

FED wants to reelect

66:47

Biden and that they don't want

66:51

Trump and that they know know that the

66:56

economy is going to

66:57

be key and so one of the reasons they'll

67:02

try to pump it up between now and

67:06

November is to help Biden and how do

67:09

they do that well they need to cut rates

67:11

they need to go back to quantitative

67:13

easing uh they need to you know create

67:15

some more phony wealth they're try to

67:17

artificially boost up the economy so

67:20

that people feel better and and and vote

67:23

Biden so yes I would agree uh that that

67:26

is you know part of the reason that the

67:28

FED is going to cut it's not the only

67:30

reason or part of the reason they're

67:31

going to go back to QE um but what

67:35

they're hoping is the the negative

67:37

effects of that meaning the the the

67:39

spike in inflation won't happen until

67:42

after the

67:43

election so basically you know the

67:46

voters won't realize what they're

67:48

getting when they when they buy Biden

67:49

right they because they they're they're

67:50

in for a shock um in 2025

67:54

when the negative consequences of you

67:57

know the fed's actions show up of course

67:59

though the government will never accept

68:01

responsibility right when like during

68:03

covid they print all this money and

68:06

create massive inflation and then we see

68:09

the consequences of it with you know

68:10

soaring prices and they never accept

68:14

responsibility for their actions it's

68:17

like yes well we we printed all this

68:18

money just to to send out these stimulus

68:21

checks and everybody spent them and

68:22

that's why prices went up right they

68:24

they don't want to accept responsibility

68:25

they act like this just happened

68:27

coincidentally oh it's all the supply

68:29

bottlenecks that's the problem look if

68:32

if we gave everybody a million dollars

68:35

right and then everybody ran to uh uh

68:39

you know uh the the Ferrari dealers to

68:41

buy a Ferrari you and then well

68:44

obviously Ferrari prices would go way up

68:46

and you would say well it's supply

68:47

problem there's not enough Ferraris of

68:49

course no no there there's never enough

68:51

Ferraris there's too much money right

68:53

you could always claim it's a supply

68:56

problem right if you just print a bunch

68:58

of money and give it to

69:00

people yeah they want to buy stuff but

69:03

Supply is always the problem because

69:06

stuff is scarce and

69:08

limited you know it's the demand that's

69:11

the problem when you give people a bunch

69:13

of money to spend the only way to get an

69:17

equilibrium is for the price to go up so

69:20

if the government just doubles the

69:21

supply of money right away and the

69:24

supply of stuff is the same everything

69:27

has to double in price so that the

69:30

economy works right it's like if we have

69:33

an

69:34

auction and in one room everybody has

69:37

$100 and that's all they have to bid and

69:40

you have the same merchandise and you

69:42

have another auction everybody has

69:43

$1,000 to spend where are the prices

69:46

going to be higher yeah it's a great

69:48

analogy yeah yeah I mean it's where it

69:50

the the because the limiting factor is

69:52

the stuff

69:54

the money is just how we allocate the

69:56

stuff right and and we set a price based

69:59

on the quantity of money and the

70:00

quantity of stuff you know now different

70:02

things will have different values

70:04

depending on how much people want

70:06

something versus something else right so

70:08

prices some prices can go up but then

70:10

other prices have to go down they all

70:12

have to adjust but all of a sudden

70:14

everybody has more money like they did

70:16

during

70:17

covid and especially worse because in

70:21

covid we gave people money to do less

70:26

work so cuz it's the work that produces

70:29

the stuff so if you stop working you you

70:32

don't have the stuff right worse to both

70:34

case scenarios you're supposed to if

70:35

you're so what we should have done is

70:37

told people okay you can't go to work

70:39

because of covid so you're not going to

70:41

get any money either because you're not

70:42

working so you can't spend we told

70:44

people don't go to work but here's money

70:47

go out and spend it spend more money

70:49

while you're staying at home than you

70:51

used to spend when you actually had a

70:53

job so it was the worst possible

70:55

combination of monetary and fiscal

70:57

policy I called it out at the time I

70:59

said this is a inflationary cocktail

71:01

this is terrible and you know of course

71:04

I was right so to distill uh all of

71:07

these issues that we have it sounds like

71:09

you've got uh mortgage back Securities

71:12

that are in the toilet office real

71:14

estate multif family commercial real

71:16

estate potentially in the toilet maybe

71:17

not so much multif family's office

71:19

obviously but you've got these these

71:21

massive issues that are creating

71:23

revaluations and losses at Banks your

71:26

thesis is that the FED May prop up Biden

71:29

here which would continue fiscal

71:31

expansionary

71:33

policies uh and basically worsen a 2025

71:37

reignition of inflation and then when

71:40

the FED finally realizes that they've

71:42

reignited inflation and you still have

71:44

the bond issues a lack of bond buyers

71:47

you've got the commercial real estate

71:48

issues and now inflation uh combined

71:52

with the debt and the debt instability

71:55

now you actually have the real

71:57

unemployment skyrocketing because

72:00

companies have to lay off just to have

72:01

any earnings left over and you have a

72:04

real crash yeah I mean you have to

72:06

understand

72:08

that the FED causes the problem by

72:12

keeping interest rates artificially low

72:15

that's the source of the problem because

72:18

in capitalism the interest rate is very

72:20

important and the price has to be right

72:24

and the price has to be determined in a

72:27

free market you never want the

72:30

government to set a price and we

72:35

understand that for most things like we

72:36

don't have a a bureau that decides how

72:39

much milk is going to cost or how much

72:41

gas is going to cost or how much

72:43

anything is going to cost we let the

72:44

market determine that right because if

72:47

the government picked a price it would

72:49

guess wrong and either we'd have a

72:51

shortage we'd have a surplus right

72:53

but for some reason we've decided that

72:56

interest rates there we need a pilot

72:59

Bureau we don't want capitalism we just

73:02

want a bunch of men in a room to get

73:04

together and decide what they think the

73:07

price should be now once we've done that

73:10

it's not a surprise that they always

73:13

think the price should be lower than it

73:15

it really is because low interest rates

73:17

benefit who debtors borrowers right

73:20

artificially you know we got this

73:21

consumer economy so

73:24

there there is a bias to wanting rates

73:25

lower than than than they need to be but

73:29

by doing that by setting a rate that's

73:32

lower than where the free market would

73:33

have set it you are causing problems

73:37

structural problems that get worse the

73:40

longer interest rates stay low now every

73:44

time the FED tries to raise rates back

73:46

or normalize them that's what exposes

73:49

the problems that the FED has created

73:51

and now the market tries to fix the

73:53

problem

73:53

by reorganizing resources repricing

73:56

assets and that causes a recession or

73:59

crisis the government's response is

74:02

always oh my God we can't allow this

74:04

cure we need to make the disease worse

74:06

so now let's print more money let's shut

74:08

it lower interest rates even lower keep

74:11

them there even longer so because of qe1

74:15

QE2 qe3 uh covid stimulus all that the

74:21

problems in the US have never been

74:23

greater than they are right now right

74:26

all we and everybody who credits the FED

74:29

for solving the problem doesn't

74:31

understand the problem or that the FED

74:33

has made it worse and so right now you

74:36

know all the warnings that I was giving

74:39

a decade ago or more the problems that I

74:41

warned about haven't gone away they've

74:43

gotten worse but the people who didn't

74:45

understand them still don't get that and

74:47

they're still looking to the FED to

74:49

solve the problems that the FED

74:51

creates if only there was some sort of

74:53

digital currency that the FED couldn't

74:55

manipulate so yes if that's yes yes

74:58

Bitcoin fixes this that's what everybody

75:00

if only there was this but you know what

75:02

but Bitcoin doesn't do that you know bit

75:04

Bitcoin you know again Bitcoin is just

75:07

one of tens of thousands of digital

75:12

currencies except Bitcoin isn't even a

75:14

digital currency because it's not used

75:16

as a currency it's a digital asset but

75:19

it's a digital asset with no value

75:21

because it doesn't do anything you know

75:25

and people claim well that's the same

75:27

thing as gold gold doesn't do anything

75:29

yes it does gold look I mean this watch

75:31

is made of gold right so there gold is

75:34

used for this watch um you have a cell

75:37

phone there's a little gold in there uh

75:40

you know so there gold is used but yes

75:43

there's a lot of gold that isn't used it

75:45

just sits there in a vault but what it's

75:48

doing is it's storing the value of its

75:50

future use that's what that gold is is

75:53

doing every ounce of gold that's stored

75:56

could be used in industry and maybe will

76:00

be used in industry at some future date

76:05

right um but when you're storing your

76:08

Bitcoin you're not storing anything that

76:10

anybody can ever use because you can't

76:12

do anything with your Bitcoin all you

76:13

can do is hold

76:15

it um and there's 20,000 other

76:20

currencies that you can also hold that

76:21

don't have any value but actually if you

76:25

wanted to use a

76:27

cryptocurrency as a med of exchange or

76:29

as a unit of account there are hundreds

76:32

of them that do it much better than

76:33

Bitcoin

76:35

and who knows what new one is going to

76:39

be created I mentioned you know my son

76:41

lost interest Shin yeah well my son my

76:44

son lost interest in Bitcoin I mean look

76:46

AI is coming right tell us about that

76:47

why why did he lose interest in Bitcoin

76:49

I don't know it's just a fat I mean

76:51

people lost interest in the hula hoop

76:53

you know you know the pet rock what

76:55

happen you know once upon a time people

76:57

used to stuff phone booths now we don't

76:59

even have phone booths but even what you

77:01

know but people stopped stuffing them

77:02

long before we lost the phone boots look

77:04

you know it's a fad but look I think

77:06

people made money like just like people

77:09

made money trading beanie

77:11

babies um you

77:13

know people jumped on the bandwagon I

77:16

mean why did people buy tulips in

77:18

Holland you know I mean so it's happened

77:22

I mean people it's it's it's been a

77:23

giant bubble Again part of the FED a lot

77:27

of bubbles were inflated due to the

77:29

fed's cheap money and people looking for

77:32

Alternatives um but Bitcoin doesn't fix

77:35

it you know it

77:37

look if everybody with Bitcoin the

77:41

problem is so you take something that

77:42

inherently has no value and we all just

77:45

pretend that it has value we agree it

77:47

has value and because we agree it has

77:50

value we we want it and because we we've

77:53

limited its Supply right um the price

77:57

goes up if more people want to buy it

78:00

and there's no increase in Supply or the

78:02

supply is it increases

78:04

slowly um the price is going to go up

78:08

but the problem is what happens if

78:10

people stop

78:12

believing what happens if new people

78:15

don't want to buy

78:16

it uh it implodes if it's all about

78:20

buying and holding it and the only use

78:23

cases to hold it

78:25

and you only hold it because you think

78:28

somebody else is going to want to pay

78:29

you more for it in the future because if

78:32

you want

78:33

something if you have Bitcoin but you

78:36

want a car you want food you want to buy

78:39

a house you want to take a vacation you

78:41

got to sell some

78:42

Bitcoin you know the the the grocery

78:45

store doesn't want your Bitcoin and even

78:47

if they took it they'd have to sell it

78:49

because they have to pay their workers

78:50

their salary they got to pay rent they

78:52

got to pay tax ta um So eventually the

78:55

Bitcoin has to be sold and if there's

78:56

not new people to buy it then the price

78:59

is going to implode I mean that's what

79:01

they're doing now with these ETFs

79:03

they're hoping to draw in new buyers

79:06

because they need new buyers to keep it

79:08

going and the higher the price is the

79:10

more money has to suck in to sustain

79:14

it um but the whole thing could collapse

79:16

I mean if people stop buying you know

79:19

one Satoshi could crash the market I

79:21

mean if I want to sell one Satoshi and

79:23

is not a buyer you know where you know

79:26

wherever that Satoshi trade sets the

79:28

market for all the others right last

79:30

trade so is it because the dollar let's

79:33

say is the the reserve currency it

79:36

always has that imputed demand whereas

79:38

Bitcoin doesn't necessarily always need

79:40

to have that imputed demand because it's

79:43

not a reserve currency then should you

79:45

make it a reserve currency well it's not

79:47

a currency it's not a reserve anything

79:50

um but the dollar

79:53

has that uh Demand right

79:57

now

79:59

because everyone in

80:02

America will sell you whatever you need

80:05

and accept dollars that is the unit of

80:08

account that is that we use that is the

80:10

medium exchange because everyone

80:11

believes in it everybody believes in it

80:14

um now at some point they may stop

80:16

believing they will stop believing but

80:17

one of the things that keeps the belief

80:20

going is the legal framework because

80:24

remember there's a US government that

80:27

collects taxes and a big military right

80:30

but the military isn't the thing it's

80:32

paying for the military so the US

80:35

government

80:37

um takes all those taxes and taxes have

80:41

to be paid in

80:43

dollars and so every American who

80:46

doesn't want to go to jail needs dollars

80:48

because the government said you know you

80:51

give us these dollars you know I an

80:53

example that my dad told me a long time

80:54

ago of how this works which you know uh

80:57

is a good example think about a bunch of

80:59

kids in a schoolyard and there's one

81:01

bully that beats the crap out of

81:03

everybody and the bully says you know

81:06

what I'm going to uh come up with a

81:09

little uh

81:10

note and if you pay me

81:13

$5 I'm going to give you this note and

81:16

this note says you paid the $5 you won't

81:18

get beat up and

81:20

so you give me the you know

81:23

and so every time I come around you got

81:24

to show me this note if you don't have

81:26

it I'm I'm going to kick the crap out of

81:27

you right so all of a sudden people want

81:30

to buy these notes because if you own

81:33

these notes you're not going to get beat

81:34

up well now you know the people in the

81:36

schoolyard will value those notes if

81:38

they you don't have a note you might you

81:40

know hey I'll give you my my lunch for

81:42

your note right because you know but

81:45

what gives the note value is the fact

81:47

that the bully is going to beat you up

81:49

if you don't have it right that that's

81:51

the US government the US government is

81:52

like look you know you got to have my

81:54

paper you got to have these dollars cuz

81:56

if you don't have them come April 15th

81:58

we're taking your ass to jail right you

82:00

need these so everybody has to get these

82:02

dollars because that's what the

82:04

government takes that's really so what

82:06

you're saying is because Bitcoin doesn't

82:08

have a bully who is forcing you to

82:10

choose that exactly there's no one

82:13

there's no one that can kick the crap

82:14

out of you if you don't have Bitcoin

82:17

right the government the government in

82:18

fact the government won't take your

82:19

Bitcoin for taxes you have to sell your

82:21

Bitcoin to get dollars that's the only

82:24

thing that they

82:26

will

82:28

accept um is is is US currency uh and so

82:31

that gives it value and that's the same

82:33

thing with uh every other currency you

82:35

have a Sovereign Nation that says this

82:40

is how you have to pay your taxes right

82:43

and so everybody needs to earn these so

82:45

that you can pay your taxes because that

82:48

is the law so that helps keep it going

82:51

but that doesn't mean that you can't

82:52

have hyperinflation me they have taxes

82:54

in zagu they have they you know they

82:56

have taxes in you know other countries

82:58

if they print too much money it's not

83:01

going to matter weaker bully I guess huh

83:04

but what about the other strong bully in

83:05

the world China can we should we invest

83:08

and buy the dip in China and the Chinese

83:10

consumer and Alibaba yeah look you know

83:13

the Chinese stocks have gone down a lot

83:17

um you know I own some I mean I I really

83:19

would like to own more than I do um

83:23

but you know part of the risk the

83:26

political risk is that the US government

83:28

comes up with sanctions and basically

83:30

says you can't own these stocks you it

83:32

forces you to sell them is that a trump

83:34

reference well Trump did it but Biden

83:37

didn't do it I mean you know who would

83:38

be worse for for investing in China oh I

83:42

I I I assume Biden is worth worse for

83:45

most things um but you know it's it's

83:47

unconstitutional that the US government

83:49

can tell you that you know you can't own

83:51

an investment but if the government

83:53

forces Americans to divest themselves of

83:56

Chinese assets it just benefits the

83:58

person who gets to buy the assets it

84:00

might actually benefit China if they get

84:02

to buy their assets back right they sell

84:03

them to Americans and then they buy them

84:05

back cheap um but look China is the

84:10

rising economic

84:13

power and yes they are

84:16

experiencing growth pains they have

84:19

problems some of them relate to

84:23

uh they're hitching their cart to our

84:25

wagon I mean they're you know they're

84:28

accumulating trillions of dollars and

84:31

they're financing exports they're

84:33

basically vendor Finance they vendor

84:35

Finance trillions of dollars of exports

84:37

to the United States that was a mistake

84:40

um but these are growing

84:42

pains uh China is on the ascent America

84:46

is on the decline you know from where we

84:48

were as a world power uh so we're we're

84:51

on a different slope unfortunately you

84:53

know they they they went from total

84:56

government complete communism and they

84:58

are introducing elements of capitalism

85:01

into a communist structure we went from

85:04

almost pure free enterprise and we've

85:06

been gradually introducing socialism so

85:09

we're kind of you know moving in

85:11

opposite directions we started at

85:13

different points the key is have we

85:15

passed you know when do we get to the

85:17

point where we're more socialist than

85:19

they are right you think that'll happen

85:21

well in in a lot of things it's already

85:23

happened I mean it hasn't completely

85:25

happened um but if you're like a small

85:30

entrepreneur you're a young kid want to

85:32

start a business General business it's

85:35

join finra well forget about finra but

85:38

if you're young if you're you know 20

85:40

years old and you want to go out and

85:41

start a business it's probably easier to

85:43

do it in China than wow I I I'm shocked

85:47

by that why yeah I mean you fewer forms

85:49

and regulations and permits and licenses

85:52

and it's not just the federal government

85:54

that licenses you you know you have

85:56

states and cities there's all kinds of

85:58

things you know that you know let's say

86:00

you just wanted to you know open up a

86:02

barber shop and and cut hair you just

86:04

can't do that you need to get licens as

86:07

a hairdresser hair styler you you need

86:09

to go to

86:10

school why can't I just cut people's

86:12

hair what the hell you know it's like I

86:15

mean like what's the worst thing that

86:16

happens you get a bad haircut you don't

86:18

come back you know I mean a lot of

86:20

people found out you know my my wife

86:22

started cutting her hair during Co she

86:24

did a pretty good job she never you know

86:25

she never took any lessons she just has

86:27

a little aesthetic you know looks at the

86:29

hair and you know um so but yeah I mean

86:34

it's it's the government makes it a lot

86:36

harder and then you have to keep all

86:37

kinds of Records yeah you know when my

86:39

grandfather came to this country uh my

86:42

father's father he became a carpenter he

86:44

came here he was 13 14 years old didn't

86:47

speak any English didn't have any money

86:50

no welfare no food stamps no government

86:53

assistant he survived and he started a

86:56

small business hired some people I mean

86:59

he never became rich but he was

87:00

self-employed but I don't know that he

87:02

could have survived if he had a deal

87:05

with workman's comp and payroll and and

87:09

ta Social Security I mean he just

87:11

probably collected some money and paid

87:13

his workers with cash he earned cash and

87:16

he probably didn't even keep records he

87:18

didn't pay any income taxes I mean that

87:19

stuff started in the 30s but when he

87:21

came here

87:23

1900 they didn't have any of that 1890s

87:25

whenever he got here you know it was

87:27

like wow you know you didn't have I mean

87:30

you wanted to start a business you just

87:32

started a business and you didn't have

87:33

to keep all these books and records of

87:35

course it's easier to keep books and

87:36

Records now because we got computers

87:38

thankfully you know they didn't have any

87:40

of that stuff back then do you think

87:43

that there's a a chance we can continue

87:47

to see spending the way it is now uh the

87:51

stock market continues to run into the

87:53

election rates come down and despite the

87:56

fact that we're spending more because

87:57

we've expanded Supply so much through

88:00

greater manufacturing that we actually

88:03

end up with deflation or well first of

88:06

all manufacturing has been in a

88:08

recession for about two years yeah so

88:10

we're actually producing less not more

88:13

um we're importing more so is capacity

88:15

going up though maybe utilization no

88:17

it's not it's not now now some companies

88:20

are starting to introduce AI in a way

88:24

that is helping productivity but we're

88:27

not seeing it in the the end results yet

88:30

I mean maybe things would be worse if we

88:32

didn't have this these gains uh and

88:35

there's a major investment going on

88:37

right now in capacity you know in in in

88:39

in in computing power that's why nid is

88:42

stocking everybody is buying all these

88:44

gpus and and so they're making a major

88:46

investment that may pay off in the

88:48

future uh and may not I mean who knows

88:51

maybe people are overestimating how this

88:53

thing is going to be I you know I don't

88:54

know you know um but no there's it it's

88:59

not going to happen in the next year now

89:02

does that mean that the stock market

89:04

can't keep rallying of course not I mean

89:06

the stock market could keep

89:08

rallying um and uh

89:12

but that you know the dollar is going to

89:15

have to break because the only way to

89:16

keep the stock market going up is not to

89:19

fight inflation to surrender to

89:21

inflation which undermines the dollar

89:23

which ultimately undermines the whole us

89:26

system because it's all predicated on

89:28

the dollar um the deficits are going to

89:31

keep

89:32

Rising um unless you know and the

89:35

government's going to have to step up

89:37

QE to fund them especially as I

89:40

mentioned Social Security deficits are

89:42

going to get bigger I mean nobody is

89:44

talking about cutting soci Security

89:46

benefits very politically unpopular

89:48

nobody wants to raise the payroll tax in

89:51

in fact all we've done is cut the

89:53

payroll tax that was one of the things

89:54

we did in Co every time there's a

89:56

recession oh let's lower the payroll tax

89:58

you know well you know and now we're

90:00

forgiving student loans where's that

90:02

money coming from again that was an

90:04

asset that the government owned but

90:06

remember every time we forgive a student

90:08

loan it's inflationary because when

90:11

people are paying student loans they're

90:13

they're not spending that money on goods

90:15

and services they're sending that money

90:16

to the government which is reducing the

90:18

deficit or making it smaller but when

90:20

you tell somebody as a student loan you

90:23

don't have to pay that loan anymore well

90:25

that now they have more money to buy

90:27

stuff and you've expanded the money

90:29

supply uh and it's inflation and who's

90:32

paying for it people think that student

90:33

debt relief is free no it costs

90:36

everybody money because the price of

90:38

everything that you need to buy will go

90:40

up the more student loans are forgiven

90:42

there's almost $2

90:44

trillion of student loans outstanding

90:48

and because the government is forgiving

90:50

them the the the they're growing even

90:53

faster because there there was always a

90:55

moral hazard that's the problem where I

90:56

mentioned how government always does

90:57

harm student loans is one of the best

91:01

examples

91:03

because in the 1960s is when all this

91:06

started right student nobody borrowed

91:08

money to go to college my

91:11

father and mother went to college none

91:14

of them took out loans now my father was

91:17

the youngest of eight kids said his my

91:19

grandfather was a carpenter he said they

91:21

could couldn't figure out if they were

91:23

upper lower class or lower middle class

91:25

but they were not even you know middle

91:27

middle class yet my dad didn't need any

91:31

student loans Wow and his parents didn't

91:34

pay for college he had a summer job he

91:36

weighed tables and that's what his

91:37

friends did there was an old expression

91:40

I'm working my way through school that's

91:42

what people did now they borrow their

91:43

way through school but the reason we got

91:46

these student loans is during the

91:49

Vietnam more days the voting age was was

91:51

initially 21 they lowered it to 18 they

91:55

said well if you're old enough to fight

91:56

you're old enough to vote so they which

91:58

was BS but they lowered the voting age

92:00

so now you have all these people who are

92:01

18 who are voting well what are 18-y

92:04

olds doing they're all going to college

92:06

how do you get their votes let's give

92:07

them loans let's happens to it so this

92:09

is what they told people don't work over

92:12

the summer have fun right have a

92:15

vacation go to Europe we'll give you the

92:18

money for college we'll loan it to you

92:21

pay it back later when you've got a

92:22

great job right so this is what started

92:25

it what started these student loans now

92:27

the minute the government started giving

92:30

kids money to go to college the colleges

92:32

were like Whoa We Could raise our prices

92:36

and they started increasing prices

92:38

because of the access to money and they

92:40

started throwing things in to college

92:43

you know nicer dorms nicer gymnasiums

92:46

different things because the kids had

92:48

the money well then tuition went up and

92:51

then the government kept saying oh

92:53

college is now more expensive we need

92:55

bigger loans we need more money you know

92:58

I went over like I looked I did an

93:00

article about this years ago I looked at

93:02

the tuition in Harvard because you can

93:04

go back to like you know 17 you know 100

93:07

or 1800 and Harvard's tuition would stay

93:10

the same for 30 or 40 years in a row

93:13

exactly the same then it would go up a

93:14

little bit then it would stay the same

93:16

for 30 or 40 years right it's not like

93:18

now where they raise it every single

93:19

year right so before the government got

93:22

involved College was affordable right

93:25

nobody had to borrow money to go to

93:26

college it was you know it wasn't cheap

93:29

you had maybe you had to get a job now

93:31

if you were Rich you didn't have to work

93:32

your parents could afford to pay you and

93:34

it wasn't anywhere near as expensive as

93:36

today but the government came in with

93:38

student loans to make College affordable

93:41

and they made it astronomically

93:43

expensive and in fact not only did

93:46

government artificially increase the

93:48

cost of a college degree right they made

93:50

a college degree much more expensive

93:53

they also destroyed the value of it

93:55

because now because the government loans

93:57

all this money to kids to go to college

93:59

everybody

94:00

goes when my father went most people

94:03

didn't go to college you just you know

94:06

you just you know you just got a

94:07

different type of job because most jobs

94:09

didn't require a college degree so if

94:11

you actually got a college degree it had

94:14

some value but now everybody gets a

94:16

college degree right so they used to say

94:19

like hey you got to go to college right

94:20

otherwise you're going to be working at

94:21

McDonald's right well now you got to go

94:23

to college to get a job at McDonald's

94:25

right because they all have college I

94:27

don't know if you ever saw this I did a

94:29

video this is about 12 years ago you go

94:31

on YouTube and type put in Peter shiff

94:34

college right and I walked around

94:37

Bourbon Street in New Orleans one one

94:39

day I'm down there for this conference

94:40

and I went to all the bars and the strip

94:43

clubs and you know whatever was there

94:46

and I I I talked to the people that were

94:48

you know the bouncers driving the petty

94:51

cars uh cleaning the the trash cans I

94:55

asked everybody did you go to

94:57

college uh when did you graduate what

94:59

was your major and everybody I talked to

95:02

had a college degree

95:04

everybody and everybody had debt but

95:07

nobody had a good job interesting some

95:09

of them had multiple I mean you'll laugh

95:11

you watch this thing but the government

95:13

did this to people and now you have the

95:15

government saying oh look at all these

95:17

students they have all this debt this is

95:19

terrible why do they have all this debt

95:21

they never could have gotten that debt

95:23

in a free market the only reason that

95:26

Banks loan them the money was because

95:28

the government guaranteed it and now the

95:30

government makes the loans and think

95:32

about this you can borrow money it

95:34

doesn't even matter what your degree is

95:36

doesn't even matter what your GPA is

95:38

right you can go to college and major in

95:41

you know uh you know women's studies you

95:44

know or gender equality or some whatever

95:47

kind of nonsense and you could even get

95:49

a master's degree in it and you could

95:51

borrow all this money the same the same

95:53

as if you're you know Ma you know doing

95:55

mathematics or computer science or

95:57

engineering they don't care and they

95:59

don't care what your grades are you can

96:01

be flunking out as long as you pass you

96:04

can keep borrowing the money and you can

96:06

go to school four years five years six

96:09

years you can keep change I mean it's

96:10

ridiculous the free market would never

96:12

screw something up this badly and who

96:15

benefited from student loans because it

96:18

wasn't the students they they suffered

96:20

it was the colleges un ities that got to

96:22

overcharge the students you know they're

96:24

living high right they you know they're

96:26

making all the money that that that

96:28

everybody is Bor the country is poor

96:31

because all of this money that could

96:33

have been used to finance the building

96:36

of factories right productive investment

96:39

was loaned to students to blow in

96:41

college you know and waste four five six

96:45

years of their lives when they could

96:47

have been out working doing something

96:49

productive said they were just getting

96:50

drunk how does do gen Z get ahead today

96:52

your or your children for example8 and

96:55

10 I believe how do they how would they

96:58

make it in kids white kids made it

97:00

because they won the lottery of this the

97:02

sperm Lottery right so how does a normal

97:05

child that age make it yeah no it's it's

97:07

going to be difficult some of them might

97:09

leave the country to make it really I

97:11

mean if there's more opportunities like

97:13

look look at what's going on now in down

97:14

in

97:15

Argentina uh I you know I with jaier M

97:19

yeah I mean look if this is the

97:20

beginning look you go to

97:24

1900 Argentina was one of the richest

97:26

countries in the world per capita I mean

97:29

there was an expression you know riches

97:30

in Argentine right I mean they were

97:32

making a ton of money they were very

97:34

wealthy down there uh and socialism

97:37

destroyed the country they bankrupted

97:39

themselves they finally elected a true

97:42

free market libertarian you know he

97:45

walked right out of the pages of an Iran

97:47

novel you know you we've got you know as

97:49

a president of a country now why did

97:52

Argentina elect somebody like this well

97:55

because there it's a basket case down

97:57

there they've had so much socialism for

98:00

so long that they're just they have a

98:02

belly full of it right and they're just

98:03

barfing it all up right um we're not

98:06

there yet we're not willing to elect a

98:08

guy that's promising Freedom we still

98:10

want to elect people that are promising

98:12

free stuff the argentinians don't want

98:15

any more free stuff because they know

98:16

how expensive it is right they can't

98:18

afford any more free stuff they want to

98:20

be left alone they want the government

98:21

to get out of the way and so to the

98:23

extent that these

98:25

reforms stick and Argentina stays on

98:29

that path a lot of Americans may be

98:31

moving down there maybe me well because

98:33

they had to go through massive uh

98:36

economic pain 40 plus% poverty to I

98:40

guess come to the recogn recognition

98:42

that either their currency wasn't strong

98:43

enough or they had too much inflation or

98:45

just mismanaged government policies or a

98:47

combination of all of those so now you

98:49

have basically that great reset

98:51

happening in Argentina do you think that

98:53

same sort of reset will come to America

98:56

well I mean we're definitely going to

98:57

get the pain right we're definitely

98:59

going to experience the consequences of

99:02

this whether we make the right decision

99:05

like Argentina has potentially made I

99:08

don't know you know we could make the

99:10

wrong decision and make it worse we yes

99:13

I mean we could we could completely go

99:15

all in on communism socialis we could

99:18

you know if our

99:19

politicians succeed

99:22

in blaming this massive crisis that's

99:25

coming if they say you see this is what

99:28

happens when you have some capitalism we

99:29

need no capitalism we need government to

99:32

control everything we need the

99:34

government to take over the means of

99:36

production you know all decisions must

99:38

be made by the benevolent leaders in

99:40

government because these greedy

99:41

capitalists have already proven how much

99:43

damage they could do right I mean who

99:45

knows uh you know what the voters are

99:47

going to uh you know buy into but yeah

99:51

there's a lot of risks uh but eventually

99:54

there's going to be some kind of uproar

99:55

there's going to be some kind of a

99:57

revolution you know that's one of the

99:59

main reasons that I object to all of

100:01

this um intrusions on our privacy on the

100:05

part of government because at some point

100:07

you know we may want to have a

100:08

revolution and you know the more power

100:11

the government has to monitor and

100:12

control us the less likely it is that

100:14

that Revolution is going to succeed it's

100:16

like a free market Revolution you're

100:18

saying people or no like people just

100:20

like civil disab are just people just

100:22

trying to fight back wow you know that's

100:24

one of the reasons that a central bank

100:25

digital currency would be so harmful why

100:28

because the government would know

100:29

everything that you do the minute you

100:30

bought something they knew exactly what

100:32

you bought you know oh he bought some uh

100:35

some uh article on freedom or something

100:37

on how government look get them or ammo

100:40

yeah whatever you got a gun or yeah I

100:41

mean they would force everybody

100:43

underground if they you know they can

100:46

control you to that degree they know

100:48

every you know every little dime that

100:50

you spend

100:51

is that true of credit cards though

100:53

already well they they already have

100:55

access to that but it's not even direct

100:56

because it's still a private company

100:58

that has the records they'd have to get

100:59

the records but if it's the government

101:02

currency they have the records then they

101:04

they have it automatically they are the

101:05

record yeah they they have they have

101:07

everything they don't have control yeah

101:10

they they have all that information on

101:12

you wow and yeah so I mean I mean it

101:14

should be resisted that's at least one

101:16

of the things Trump is saying is no dig

101:17

no Central Bank digital currency I'm not

101:19

going to allow that uh because you know

101:21

he does see the threat there what do you

101:23

think

101:25

Mikey uh one more cryptocurrency

101:27

question you mentioned before that the

101:29

free market is really good at finding

101:31

the Ponzi schemes even better so than

101:33

government would be yes how come Bitcoin

101:35

hasn't been discovered as a Ponzi I know

101:37

now we have the ETFs and all that but go

101:39

back a few years how come nobody's found

101:40

Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme and sold out

101:42

why isn't it crashed yet maybe it's not

101:43

a

101:46

Ponzi well yeah well yeah it's obviously

101:51

it's gone on for a long time and so to

101:55

the extent that I'm right that it's a

101:57

Ponzi and it's not like a classic

101:59

Ponzi it's more of a a a of a hybrid you

102:03

know it's kind of got elements of a

102:05

Ponzi got elements of a pyramid elements

102:08

of a chain

102:09

letter um but it's new right it hasn't

102:13

been used in this form

102:17

before and due to the

102:21

the internet and the commun the way we

102:25

can

102:26

communicate the potential audience

102:29

participants has been greatly expanded I

102:31

mean when Ponzi was operating his scheme

102:33

or even Bernie maid off I mean how many

102:35

people really could could get in you

102:37

know uh but it was so easy for people to

102:42

to get into it so I think that it's not

102:46

that it's not going to collapse it's

102:49

just that

102:51

this has enabled it to have a longer

102:54

life and I do think that ultimately the

102:56

governments are going to react in the

102:58

future and probably Outlaw a lot of this

102:59

stuff I mean China has already done it

103:01

but once everybody loses you know their

103:03

money the government's going to come in

103:04

and do something um which they always do

103:07

right after all the horses have left the

103:09

barn they they try to come to the Rescue

103:11

by by closing the doors on on an empty

103:13

Barn um but yeah I mean it has gone on

103:17

for a long time but the interest

103:20

interesting thing about it is the peak

103:24

was almost three years

103:25

ago so it really

103:29

stopped growing now some people say well

103:32

that's just temporary well we'll see but

103:35

if you go back to 2021 which was really

103:38

the peak that was when we had uh all the

103:41

big money coming in the ads were going

103:43

nonstop I mean the ads have kind of

103:45

recirculated again resurfaced with the

103:47

ETFs but we had all the ads we had all

103:50

the all coins we had the nfts uh we had

103:54

um uh you know uh El Salvador we had

103:57

sailor uh all this stuff was going on

104:00

you know we had three or four Super Bowl

104:02

ads I don't think there's any

104:03

cryptocurrencies crypto companies

104:05

advertising in the Super Bowl this

104:07

year um you know we had stadiums that

104:10

were named for crypto crypto.com

104:12

so

104:15

um I think that was like the blowoff top

104:19

and so I think now you know the air is

104:22

coming out of the bubble it's it's

104:23

taking longer they've been able to

104:24

breathe some life into it again with the

104:26

ETFs but now that they're

104:29

here um I think that that good news is

104:33

in the past now and it's set up for a

104:36

disappointment if we don't get all this

104:37

new buying and then all of a sudden the

104:39

people that got in want to get out and

104:42

the people that bought in anticipation

104:44

of the ETF demand you know once they

104:46

think it's topped out uh but does that

104:49

mean it can't can't possibly make

104:51

another new high and take out 655,000

104:54

remember all those people that had you

104:56

know laser beams in their eyes that was

104:58

for Bitcoin 100,000 right so it was

105:02

supposed to be there a long time ago

105:04

your neighbor is betting that he will

105:06

buy home in this neighborhood with

105:09

Bitcoin going to the Moon is is he going

105:11

to be disappointed well a lot of people

105:12

have already bought homes in this

105:14

neighborhood with their Bitcoin that's

105:15

why the prices went up so much so the

105:19

the early money cashed out

105:21

the smart

105:22

money um that got in I mean I guess I

105:25

mean I could have got in I was I I was

105:27

too smart for my own good I outsmarted

105:30

myself because I looked at Bitcoin you

105:32

know when it was you know below $10 I

105:35

don't remember if it was below a dollar

105:37

or not but regardless it was it was low

105:40

and I just outsmarted myself and I just

105:42

thought well you know and I

105:44

overestimated everybody else's

105:45

intelligence to make the same conclusion

105:48

wow but it was I mean if there was ever

105:50

a bub with my name on it this was it

105:52

right I should have got in on it on the

105:53

ground floor but I also have a problem

105:56

like I can't like buy something and and

105:59

publicly talk about it if I don't

106:00

believe in it so I would have had to buy

106:02

it and kept my mouth shut which I guess

106:04

I could have done so top five

106:05

Investments now what are your top five

106:08

investment recommendations now maybe not

106:09

recommendations but what where what do

106:11

you think for yourself your top five we

106:14

don't want Fina get

106:16

upset well fin has nothing to say about

106:18

it now because I I'm not a member

106:20

anymore after 30 years I I'm fin refree

106:22

I didn't renew any of my licenses and I

106:24

pulled my affiliation which ones did you

106:26

have by the way which oh I had pretty

106:28

much most of them I mean I had your

106:30

standard you know Series 7 that people

106:33

have but I I was a registered principal

106:36

which is4 series 24 I was an option

106:39

principal which is series 4 I was a

106:41

municipal Bond principal I was a

106:44

financial principle which was like a 27

106:46

the finop oh yeah was I was every

106:48

because I owned my own firm I had all

106:50

these light licenses I had to get a

106:51

whole bunch of them you I had like a

106:53

dozen of these

106:54

things um and those are hard tests I I

106:57

just passed well when I took the test

106:58

though they were on paper oh what's that

107:01

you know yeah I

107:03

I I I had have a number two

107:06

pencil two pencil but you know now

107:09

they've upped all this continuing

107:11

education crap which all the continuing

107:13

education isn't about how to be a good

107:14

adviser it's about how to comply with

107:16

their rules and regulations that's what

107:18

the tests are for that you all the AML

107:21

and all the other compliance and you

107:23

know stuff like that but so I'm not

107:27

doing it anymore but look what I think

107:29

people should be doing I mean first of

107:31

all the

107:32

do-it-yourselfers that have you know

107:34

their own brokerage accounts discount

107:35

brokerage firms they should be loading

107:37

up on my mutual funds right uh because

107:41

those funds have been created and are

107:44

managed with this perspective of of

107:47

understanding how these events are going

107:49

to play out okay and what companies are

107:53

best positioned to not only weather it

107:56

but actually benefit from it what

107:59

companies and they're almost all

108:00

overseas companies and their primary

108:03

consumer is not in the United States

108:06

because Americans are buying on credit

108:08

they're buying with currency that's

108:10

going to collapse in value I think if

108:12

your business relies on American

108:14

consumers you're going to be in trouble

108:16

why uh mutual funds versus say ETF well

108:19

you could I mean I convert my funds into

108:21

an ETF okay that the thing isn't just

108:23

that it's my it's the fund it's what I

108:26

own it's it's it's the businesses that

108:29

I've invested in you're not going to

108:31

find that in any other mutual fund or

108:33

ETF they people aren't investing the way

108:36

I am and I and I am I I have a a

108:38

long-term Focus how is that like give us

108:40

a structure is it all in on Argentina

108:43

well most most

108:45

um funds are managed to kind of mimic

108:51

some type of index or

108:53

Benchmark and so they're really like a

108:56

closet indexer they they may beer a

108:59

little bit from the index to try to

109:02

outperform it by a bit but they don't

109:04

want to underperform it by too much

109:07

either my funds look nothing like their

109:09

benchmarks and that's why you'll see

109:11

some years my funds are number one out

109:13

of like 350 funds and some years they're

109:15

at the bottom right it's because I'm

109:17

I've got I'm I'm not afraid to be very

109:19

different

109:21

than the indexes because I know the

109:23

index are indexes are dominated by the

109:26

most

109:27

overvalued assets stocks that have the

109:29

most to fall but in the short run

109:32

magnificent five six those are all

109:34

overvalued yeah I mean and the sectors

109:35

that they're in I mean I I'm investing

109:38

to win the game okay to to to have to

109:40

have you know and that's not apple or

109:42

Facebook or Google or well no you if you

109:45

want to outperform in the short run

109:47

people can own those stocks but they're

109:49

so overpriced you're not going to make

109:51

any real money in the long run you could

109:53

make money in the short run before the

109:55

Music Stops if you get out in time but I

109:57

don't want to I don't want to base my

109:59

investment strategy on hoping I get out

110:02

in

110:02

time I don't have to get out of my

110:05

stocks I own the right stocks right I I

110:08

I have the winning hand I just have to

110:10

keep my cards until you know the we can

110:13

show them a lot of people are are are

110:16

going to lose but as long as they don't

110:19

have to show me what they got right they

110:21

could they could you know Bluff they

110:23

could put chips under the

110:24

pot um so my funds are are are position

110:28

right own value assets good dividends I

110:31

got to get some that's all right uh hold

110:34

on maybe real estate in included in

110:37

there or would you add real estate at

110:39

this to or is that dangerous to allocate

110:40

to right now anyway getting back to my

110:42

funds first yeah yeah so I own

110:44

businesses that you know are low pees

110:47

you know four times earnings five six

110:49

seven eight you know some some of them

110:50

are higher PS depending alibaba's down

110:52

there would that be part of it well we

110:54

have we don't have Alibaba we do own

110:55

like we own tensent you know which is

110:57

you know something similar um uh and we

111:01

own it you know in in Hong Kong this

111:03

year or no in in in in um Singapore no

111:08

no that's Hong Kong it's in Hong

111:10

Kong

111:12

um but

111:16

um they pay good dividends and most of

111:21

the businesses that we have are selling

111:25

products or providing services that that

111:27

that people need and that people are

111:29

going to continue to buy okay um not the

111:33

companies that are selling people things

111:36

that they they buy if they can afford it

111:38

because they they have money left over

111:40

when they finish buying the things that

111:41

they need uh I want to buy you know

111:44

companies that have pricing power

111:46

because there's a lot of inflation so

111:47

they can raise their prices and I want

111:50

companies that have consumers in the

111:52

emerging markets in places where people

111:54

are going to get richer not poor where

111:56

people are spending from income not

111:59

credit cards you know where they have

112:01

adequate savings for their retirement

112:04

where they're not dependent on a

112:05

government-run Ponzi scheme uh and you

112:08

know you want to have a lot of exposure

112:10

to non-dollars you want to have

112:11

resources I mean Commodities I mean the

112:14

the gold stocks in particular I mean are

112:16

just so super cheap because gold is

112:19

going to be r valued uh much higher than

112:21

it is once uh people figure out you know

112:25

where we're headed and and where we are

112:27

and so there is an opportunity there so

112:28

I have a gold fund uh I have a emerging

112:31

market fund miners or gold itself like

112:34

no the miners okay yeah you I mean you

112:36

gold itself people should own as a store

112:39

value as a safe haven you know 5 10% of

112:42

your portfolio should be uh in metals

112:45

and you should have some metals you know

112:47

on your person like in your home just

112:49

silver because you may need them you may

112:50

you may go to a situation where that's

112:53

how you buy things right if there's you

112:55

know really black markets uh if there's

112:58

shortages and price controls and a lot

113:00

of bad things could happen drone power

113:02

won't save the day H drone no you're not

113:05

going to be able to buy anything with

113:06

that money if nobody wants it you know

113:08

and especially if it's illegal to charge

113:10

a market price if you want to buy

113:11

something you're going to have to do it

113:12

on the black market and you may have to

113:15

do it in something that the government

113:16

can't track right the guy you know cuz

113:19

there it's controlled by the seller so

113:21

the seller may say hey I've got some of

113:23

these products you know that you need

113:25

but I I want silver I want something

113:28

that the government doesn't track

113:30

because it's illegal I'm doing something

113:32

illegal I shouldn't even be selling you

113:34

this right I'm breaking the law I don't

113:36

want to get caught so you got to pay me

113:38

in something that I you know that

113:41

they're not going to know that I that I

113:42

that I that I did this

113:43

transaction um but my funds I think are

113:47

unique um you know we have some property

113:49

trusts in the funds you know that own

113:52

property but real real estate you know

113:55

is is is a hard asset a real asset it's

113:57

not quite as portable and as liquid as

114:00

let's say gold but you know you can

114:02

generate income from Real Estate either

114:04

you can rent it out or you can you know

114:06

you can Farm it what property funds

114:08

would it be like uh multif family

114:10

developers home builders yeah I mean we

114:12

have some um Asia no I don't own any in

114:16

the US forign cuz I'm trying to get out

114:18

of the US get out the dollar even at

114:20

wait even out of us real estate you want

114:22

to get out of well I don't want to be in

114:26

the publicly traded Vehicles okay okay

114:29

now us real estate to

114:31

me is you

114:33

know it's going to be it's not going to

114:35

be homogenius you know and you know I

114:38

was telling people for a long time yeah

114:40

you can go out and buy a house as long

114:42

as you get a 30-year fixed rate mortgage

114:44

because that's your big asset the fact

114:46

that you were able to borrow all this

114:47

money cheap the only way to lock it up

114:49

was to buy a piece of property but I

114:51

still said look it makes a difference

114:53

where the property is you know uh it's

114:55

not all the same uh but now you can't

114:58

get a 30-year loan you know at 3% you're

115:01

going to pay maybe six and a half seven

115:03

which is still probably a decent rate um

115:06

but it's not like it

115:08

was um but yeah I mean people could

115:11

still buy property if it if it pencils

115:13

out right you know the values that are

115:15

there but I think the market is

115:17

overpriced um

115:20

and in real terms right if you want to

115:23

think about how much gold do you need to

115:26

buy a house sure you're going to be able

115:30

to buy a lot more house with your gold

115:32

in the future you won't need as much

115:33

gold to buy to buy the house because in

115:36

in those real terms it's going to come

115:37

down oh that's because you think gold

115:39

prices will go up not because you think

115:40

real estate prices will come down well

115:42

it's because I think the value of the

115:43

dollar is going to go down and as the

115:46

value of the dollar goes down the price

115:47

of everything else goes up okay so the

115:50

value of homes denominated in dollars

115:52

would actually go up right but not up

115:55

not not up as much as in Gold okay okay

115:58

okay and so that really shows you that

116:00

the real price of real estate is going

116:01

down even as the nominal price is going

116:03

up but I don't think that it's just gold

116:07

that will go up more than real estate

116:09

you know corn you know cotton

116:13

Commodities Coco right I mean and what

116:17

it costs you know your your your your

116:20

insurance you know your health care you

116:23

know everything else you know you know

116:26

your grocery bill I mean everything is

116:28

going to go up more than your house now

116:30

the thing about your house is the

116:32

leverage component to it right because

116:34

you're you're you're borrowing money to

116:36

buy the asset and it's it's the it's the

116:38

The Leverage that can end up making you

116:40

some money because inflation wipes out

116:43

the debt inflation transfers wealth from

116:48

um creditor s to borrowers so the the

116:52

lender loses at the

116:55

borrower gain that's why you know the US

116:59

government one of the reasons they

117:01

create inflation on purpose is because

117:04

the US government is the world's biggest

117:06

debtor and so if inflation they have to

117:08

keep it going they have to keep

117:09

inflation of yes because that's how they

117:12

can inflate the debt away because so the

117:14

pon keeps going I go long stocks the

117:16

debt is unpayable right you can't pay

117:18

the debt off so they try to reduce the

117:21

value through inflation but again it

117:24

doesn't continue in some benevolent

117:27

cycle eventually there's a collapse

117:29

eventually inflation Runs Out of Control

117:32

right they they they can't you know uh

117:35

they they can't keep it in control it

117:37

always gets out of control right uh it's

117:40

like they think they can control the

117:41

fire but but they can't right because it

117:44

it's got to get bigger and bigger bigger

117:46

like like like a drug addiction I I I'm

117:48

gonna but people think they're going to

117:50

control their addiction I can you know I

117:52

no no because you keep needing the more

117:54

you do a drug then now you don't get the

117:56

same effect you always have to increase

117:59

your dosage and eventually you know now

118:02

you're taking too much so we keep

118:04

needing more and more inflation to paper

118:07

over the mistakes created by the last

118:10

inflation again look at all the debt we

118:12

have now look at how much inflation we

118:13

have to create to prevent rates from

118:16

rising because it would the whole thing

118:18

would implode I mean what if interest

118:20

rates went to 10% right I mean they went

118:23

to

118:23

20% in 1980 George gamon believes that

118:27

this is what's likely that the yield

118:29

curve is indicating we're about to go to

118:31

potentially much higher rates in the

118:33

future well we should go to a higher

118:34

rate I

118:36

mean

118:38

fundamentally we have a lot less savings

118:42

now and a lot more debt than we did in

118:46

1980 uh so the market should price PR

118:50

credit higher now especially the US

118:52

government you know in 1980 we had 1

118:54

trillion in debt now we're 34 trillion

118:57

in debt in 1980 we were the world's

119:00

biggest creditor Nation now the we're

119:01

the world's biggest debtor we had trade

119:03

surpluses in 1980 now we have trade

119:05

deficit so just looking at the us we're

119:08

a much worse credit risk right than we

119:10

were back then and so you know the the

119:14

worse of a credit risk you are right the

119:16

lower your FICO score the more expensive

119:18

it is for to borrow yeah so our cost of

119:22

borrowing should be higher now than it

119:24

was was back then and you know just

119:26

supply and demand we have more debt less

119:28

savings that means a higher price to

119:30

clear the market but let's say let's say

119:33

rates went to

119:35

10% um between let's say between now and

119:39

the next few years okay and the national

119:42

debt goes to let's say you know 40

119:46

trillion well it'll be there in a year

119:47

so let's say 50 trillion let's say in

119:50

four or five years we have $50 trillion

119:52

debt and we have 10% interest rate well

119:56

what's 10% of of of 50 trillion five

120:00

trillion a that's that's more than the

120:03

government collects in taxes sure it's a

120:05

fifth of our economy that's just

120:08

interest but

120:10

also when you have all this short-term

120:13

debt which is what we have right and we

120:16

and as it matures we keep rolling it

120:17

over short term

120:19

people can take their money back we're

120:22

all focusing on the interest what if we

120:25

have to repay the

120:27

principle because people are under the

120:29

impression that we never have to repay

120:31

the principal right well that's not true

120:32

because we're borrowing the money we're

120:34

not stealing the money right so like

120:36

when people tell me we never have to pay

120:37

back the national debt I always say well

120:40

have you discussed this with the lenders

120:41

that they realize that's the deal right

120:44

they never get their money back

120:46

but if people don't want to buy

120:48

Treasures anymore and the treasury

120:50

matures right they go to the US

120:52

government they bought a one-year

120:53

treasury okay let me have my money back

120:56

and the government says well don't you

120:57

want to buy a brand new one no thank you

120:59

I just want my money back I don't want

121:01

to buy another one how do we convince

121:03

them to buy another one well how about

121:05

if we pay you more interest how about 6%

121:08

n I'm still not interested I want my

121:10

money back 7% 8% right it takes but we

121:13

can't pay so if we're not able to raise

121:16

interest rates because we can't afford

121:18

it it's not just the interest it's the

121:21

principle MH and and so where's the

121:24

principle going to come from it's going

121:25

to come from the FED now remember the

121:28

which exacerbates the problem right when

121:30

when Ben beragi first did quantitative

121:33

easing before they called it qe1 because

121:35

it was the only one he went to Congress

121:38

in 2009 and there was you know some

121:41

Republicans who were said hey wait a

121:42

minute you're monetizing the debt this

121:45

is bad this is Banana Republic style you

121:48

can't monetize debt that's inflation

121:51

beraki said oh no no we're not doing

121:53

that we would never monetize the debt no

121:55

no we realize that's bad we're not doing

121:57

that he said this is temporary we're

122:00

going to sell these bonds right back

122:01

into the market we're just doing this

122:03

it's an emergency we're just temporarily

122:06

buying these bonds and mortgages we're

122:08

going to sell them so this the balance

122:10

sheet is going to go right back down as

122:11

soon as this crisis is over so yeah no

122:13

we're with you we would never monetize

122:15

this debt right so back then I said he

122:17

was lying cuz I said there's no way that

122:19

you could do this and then reverse it I

122:21

said it's a monetary roach Rotel you

122:23

could check in but you can't check out

122:26

that's why I said that when this is over

122:27

they're going to do it again you know

122:28

that we'd have more qes than Rocky

122:30

movies I say this at the beginning well

122:33

now here we are 12 years later the

122:34

balance sheet is almost 8

122:36

trillion so clearly we did monetize the

122:40

debt we did exactly what bangi said that

122:42

was really bad and he would never do

122:45

well that's what we're going to do with

122:47

the debt we're going to monetize even

122:48

more of it the balance Sheet's going to

122:49

go to 10 trillion 15 trillion 20

122:52

trillion wow because they're going to

122:54

have to buy the bonds cuz nobody else is

122:56

going to buy them and now it's it's

122:58

going up you know

123:00

exponentially um but then too it's not

123:03

just the treasuries they got to buy Muni

123:06

bonds they got to buy corporate bonds

123:07

they got to buy the mortgage back scares

123:09

because everything they don't buy is

123:11

going to you know collapse and the

123:13

yields are going to go up so that that's

123:14

where you know the slippery slope uh to

123:17

hyperinflation and the only way to get

123:19

off that slope is to crash the economy

123:21

on purpose to have a financial crisis

123:24

that's worse than 2008 and I'm talking

123:26

about a financial crisis where you lose

123:28

your money where you have an account at

123:31

Bank of America or Wells Fargo and you

123:33

lose the money not just that the

123:36

government doesn't ensure the deposits

123:39

that are over 250 it's all gone it

123:41

doesn't ensure anything because the FDIC

123:44

doesn't have the money unless the FED

123:45

creates it well the FED CR create it if

123:48

it's fighting it inflation if it's

123:50

restricting the supply of money which it

123:52

needs to do to stop hyperinflation so

123:55

that's why I tell people if you have

123:57

your money in the bank there's only two

124:00

ways it's going to end you're going to

124:02

lose your money in the bank or your your

124:04

money is going to lose its value so

124:06

you're going to lose your purchasing

124:07

power or you're going to lose your money

124:09

but either way you're going to lose

124:10

you're going to go broke if you have

124:12

money in the bank because you're all the

124:14

banks are going to fail unless the

124:15

government bails them out but if the

124:17

government bails them out then the money

124:19

fails because they have to create

124:20

massive inflation wow it it would be

124:23

better if you lost your

124:24

money but if your money loses its value

124:27

it's worse you know because now you got

124:29

a bunch of worthless money but that that

124:31

has bigger problems for the for the

124:33

economy and you think that's close look

124:36

it's been close for a long time but now

124:38

we've just had a banking crisis I mean

124:39

now going into 2024 here is it happening

124:41

this look we we're obviously we're

124:44

closer now than we've ever been right um

124:48

and I don't think people should be

124:50

pressing their luck people should be

124:52

preparing as if it was going to happen

124:55

tomorrow and if it doesn't happen

124:57

tomorrow then at least you're prepared

125:00

right you got these people Preppers that

125:01

are like you know building Doomsday

125:04

Bunkers right I mean this is a little

125:07

you know not as Extreme as that and I'm

125:09

not going to necessarily laugh at the

125:10

Doomsday bunker I might end up with my

125:12

own but I mean but this is a lot less

125:16

extreme but again you can't build the

125:18

doomsday bunker after the the crisis

125:22

after the Doom it it it has to be in

125:25

place and fully provisioned in advance

125:30

so you got to get your financial house

125:32

in order because again it's not a

125:33

question of will this Crisis happen it's

125:36

100% certainty that it will the only

125:39

variable is when now maybe you'll get

125:41

lucky and die you know before it happens

125:43

right and then it's your kids's problem

125:45

um but I don't want to bet on dying to

125:48

avoid problem I I I you know I want to

125:50

be here you saw all the equipment I've

125:51

got to keep me to keep keep me young

125:54

multiple hundreds of thousands of

125:56

dollars of you were in it how was it

125:59

very chilly negative 124 degrees it's

126:02

going to be real chilly in the financial

126:04

world too if you don't you know you

126:05

don't have yourself protected so as I

126:07

said you got my mutual funds but people

126:10

you know people can work with me

126:12

directly they can come to my asset

126:13

management company which I'm still there

126:15

so that's SEC registered not finra

126:17

anymore see because you're that's an

126:19

investment

126:21

advisor right we're fee based so I don't

126:23

I don't work on commission anymore I

126:26

just manage money for fee okay um but I

126:29

think we do a job that you're not going

126:32

to find anywhere else in in the

126:33

investment community no one's got the

126:36

balls to to manage the money the way I

126:38

do and they don't actually have the

126:39

foresight to

126:40

understand that what they that they need

126:42

to do this um but I think we're we're

126:46

we're constructing and managing

126:48

portfolio

126:49

uh that are ideally positioned I mean if

126:52

you would have had my portfolio in

126:56

1970 and you would have stuck with it

126:58

through 1980 you would have just crushed

127:00

it I mean with you guys remember what

127:03

happened in 19 from 1970 the dollar lost

127:07

about two-thirds of its value against

127:08

other currencies the deutschmark went

127:10

from four you got four do schach to the

127:13

dollar to one and a half you went from

127:15

buying 360 yen to about 150

127:19

oil went from $3 a barrel to $30 a

127:21

barrel gold went from $35 an ounce to$

127:25

800 uh we went through this massive

127:29

stagflation uh it was a terrible economy

127:32

right all these married women were

127:36

forced into the workforce because their

127:38

husband's salaries were eviscerated by

127:40

inflation and taxes uh and so they had

127:43

no choice they had to go get a job um

127:46

but the Investments certain Investments

127:49

if you invested in in Japan if you

127:51

invested in Emerging Markets if you

127:53

invested in Commodities you invested in

127:55

oil you invested in Gold you made a

127:57

killing where did you get killed if you

128:00

stayed in US bonds and US

128:02

Stocks us bonds I mean complete

128:05

disaster uh stocks you know in in the

128:09

1960s they had something called the

128:11

nifty50 right uh these were stocks they

128:13

called them one decision stocks the only

128:16

decision is when to buy you never have

128:17

to sell because they never stopped going

128:19

up right in 1966 the Dow was at a

128:23

th000 in 1980 it was still at 1,000

128:26

despite all that inflation despite the

128:29

fact that gold went from $35 ounce to

128:31

800 the Dow didn't go anywhere that's

128:34

why the real price of the Dow in 1982 I

128:38

think was at an all-time record low or

128:40

19881 it was almost

128:43

1:1 that was lower than the Dow was at

128:47

its low point in 19 32 it was actually

128:50

the record low for the US Stock Market

128:52

was in the early

128:53

80s in terms of gold like oh in terms of

128:56

girl 82 was also just in terms of Dollar

128:59

Bottom and then it was up like 40 years

129:02

from there well in early 80s you wanted

129:04

to sell all your gold and buy buy stocks

129:06

right now you'd want to do the opposite

129:08

if if the only choice were US Stocks

129:11

because you know you're looking it's not

129:12

quite 20 to1 right the Dow is almost

129:15

40,000 and Gold's about 2,000 it's so

129:18

was close to 20 to1 that was where the

129:21

peak that was the peak in 1929 20 to1

129:24

now the alltime record Peak was 2000 it

129:27

was like 40 to1 the.com bubble was the

129:29

peak for the day you know because gold

129:31

was under 300 so we we got we got about

129:34

a 40 to1 ratio so we're we're well off

129:36

the highs but we're still in expensive

129:39

territory you know I think the Dow is

129:41

going to come you know below 2 to one I

129:44

don't know if it'll get all the way to 1

129:45

to one and that again could be dollar or

129:47

gold up yeah well the same thing so

129:49

where where would it be so if the Dow is

129:51

40,000 and gold is 20,000 that's 2 to1

129:54

but the Dow can go to 10,000 and gold

129:57

can go to 5,000 why's gold been so stuck

130:00

with all this

130:01

inflation well you remember gold went

130:03

from under 300 in 2000 to almost 2,000

130:08

in 2011 had a huge gain it's now moved

130:11

sideways for a while Consolidated those

130:13

gains yeah it's getting ready for

130:15

another big leg up this all going to

130:17

smooth out you know in you know in 30 or

130:19

40 years when you look back you will

130:20

barely notice this period of stady when

130:23

you look at gold at 10,000 20,000

130:25

wherever it's going uh because it it has

130:27

to go there I mean the dollar has

130:29

already lost 99% of its value against

130:32

gold when we started on the gold

130:34

standard when the Federal Reserve was

130:36

introduced gold was $20 an ounce it's

130:39

now $2,000 an ounce that's a good point

130:42

that gold hasn't changed gold is the

130:45

same the dollar has lost 99% % of its

130:48

value you you need a 100 times as many

130:51

dollars to buy an ounce of gold as you

130:53

needed when we created the Federal

130:55

Reserve but the thing is before we

130:57

created the Federal Reserve gold in 1800

131:00

was the same price it was in

131:02

1900 because the dollar didn't lose

131:04

value for those 100 years because we

131:06

didn't have a Federal Reserve W during

131:08

those 100 years we had capitalism you

131:10

know prices were going were going down

131:12

so people should you know they can come

131:14

to my ra EUR Pacific Capital and we

131:16

could create a portfolio

131:18

because if you stayed with the the

131:20

stocks that worked in the 60s in the 70s

131:23

you lost your ass if you were smart

131:25

enough to make the shift out of the

131:28

nifty50 out of the Polaroids right that

131:31

was one of the stocks right how many

131:33

people are using Polaroids down right

131:35

you know maybe as a gag item at a party

131:37

once well somebody will take a Polaroid

131:38

right shift shift shift shift but you

131:41

know everything that's new is old

131:43

eventually right all the new technology

131:45

is you know is old I mean I I you know I

131:48

remember oh cassettes came and they

131:50

replaced records and for a brief period

131:54

of time I thought I was cool with an

131:55

eight track and that didn't last very

131:57

long and then they and then oh my God

131:59

look at these D these DVDs who has those

132:02

they don't exist anymore either I mean

132:04

it's it's there it's new it's great and

132:06

then it's gone right so you know but if

132:09

you

132:10

stay with you know the stocks you know

132:14

that dominate the NASDAQ these few

132:16

stocks that everybody make money in if

132:19

you overstay that party you're going to

132:22

have massive losses just like people did

132:24

in the 1970s probably worse you've got

132:27

to recognize you know that you know the

132:31

time to leave was yesterday I mean you

132:33

can't you can't try to get every last

132:35

drop you know there was a famous I think

132:37

saying you know if was who who who it

132:39

was Bernard baroo you know but whatever

132:41

you know what was your secret to

132:44

investment success I always sold too

132:46

soon right you you can't try to get

132:49

every last bit of a bubble right you you

132:51

got to get out and and you got to be

132:53

willing to let somebody else you know

132:54

make we've got a couple final questions

132:56

let finish finish the point so you got

132:58

to make this shift and that's what are

133:01

my portfolios that I have now and I've

133:03

been building are the ones that are

133:06

going to do well in the next cycle right

133:08

not the ones that did well in the last

133:09

cycle right they're going get crushed

133:12

right it's invest for the future

133:14

anticipate how the winds are going to

133:17

change and where the pendam is going to

133:19

swing and and or you know skate to the

133:22

puck right where it's going to be right

133:24

and and and shoot ahead of the Running

133:25

Deer yes all these there's all kinds of

133:27

ways to explain this but you know people

133:30

don't get it in the investment world so

133:32

I I I'm there these portfolios and you

133:34

know they're still producing returns

133:37

positive returns paying dividends um uh

133:41

but in the in in the long run if I'm

133:43

right in the long run maybe just around

133:45

the

133:46

corner uh these are the strategies that

133:48

you need to adopt and you know Mikey you

133:50

have a question we've got we've got H

133:53

who has a couple questions if he could

133:54

jump in really hop on in h you want you

133:56

want to just hop in so you can listen to

133:57

the mic you want to switch really quick

133:59

a couple last final questions here Peter

134:01

thank you so much for your time this

134:03

been wonderful but H you've written down

134:05

a few questions here what what do you

134:07

got yeah so you mentioned China is the

134:08

rising economic power um pretty much I

134:11

think we agree that Bernan and Friends

134:13

in' 08 they agree they debt monetization

134:16

uh they chose and inflationary route and

134:18

now we're having to pay for it we're

134:20

going to have to pay for it for the next

134:21

couple decades we don't know the exact

134:22

timeline but uh it's either you it's

134:25

like an inflationary bubble it's giant

134:27

Central Ponzi uh and the only way we

134:30

could get out of it is a deflationary

134:31

bubble which nobody wants to do because

134:32

all the inflation was an assets and all

134:34

the rich people who are in charge it was

134:35

just it's Nob I know it's probably not

134:37

going to happen um my question is to you

134:40

is that do you think China chose the

134:42

opposite do you think China is currently

134:44

in its kind of 08 um where it's earlier

134:47

uh in its EC economic rise still

134:48

relatively higher GDP numbers and

134:51

they've chosen to do the more fiscally

134:53

and monetarily responsible Thing by

134:55

choosing less stimulus we see that you

134:57

know the hansang index is way lower it's

135:01

like it's been paining for around two

135:03

three years we saw that they even during

135:05

covid with all that pressure they chose

135:07

to actually limit the economy to not be

135:09

giving out as many stimulus checks um so

135:12

yeah my I guess my question to you is I

135:14

I am my hypothesis my thesis is

135:17

potentially that China is even like is

135:20

doing the fiscally is doing the

135:22

responsible thing even though they are

135:25

Socialist Communist background

135:27

historically would you agree disagree

135:30

and why yeah I mean first of

135:32

all they always choose inflation over

135:35

deflation

135:37

because they can always blame the

135:40

inflation on somebody else and the pain

135:43

generally happens later rather than

135:45

sooner you know that's what happened I

135:46

mentioned when we went off the gold

135:48

standard in 1971 Nixon had a choice then

135:51

deflation or inflation because we could

135:53

have stayed on the gold standard and

135:55

allowed a deflation we could have

135:56

allowed prices to come down asset prices

135:59

good prices to meet gold instead we went

136:03

off the gold standard and instead of the

136:05

prices of everything coming down the

136:07

price of gold went up right that's what

136:08

we did we ended up devaluing the dollar

136:11

instead of deflating the economy which

136:13

had been inflated based on all the

136:16

stimulus spending of the 19 1960s you

136:18

know predominantly the war on poverty

136:20

Great Society Johnson right yeah yeah

136:23

all all that stuff that that that had

136:24

that happened in the 60 so we have a

136:27

much bigger bubble now we had much more

136:29

inflationary policies deflation is the

136:32

solution to our problem but the disease

136:36

is so big that The Cure kills us too

136:39

right I mean it's like that's the

136:40

problem and so they're going to choose

136:43

inflation now the reason that China may

136:46

not is one of China's strengths when it

136:51

comes may not what may not choose

136:53

inflation may make the right choice

136:55

whereas America

136:57

won't is China doesn't elect its leaders

137:02

democratically party

137:04

control so the problem with democracy

137:09

and it's an underlying flaw that every

137:12

democracy struggles with and it's why

137:14

we're not supposed to be a democracy the

137:16

founding fathers understood the evils of

137:18

democracy they called it

137:20

mobocracy um and and they they they

137:23

established a a republic we had some

137:25

democratic aspects within the Republic

137:27

but you know the whole idea was to

137:30

safeguard the country from the evils of

137:32

democracy because they knew that

137:34

democracies are as violent in their

137:36

deaths as they are in their births and

137:38

what do you mean by that like so the

137:39

problem so the problem with democracy is

137:42

decisions are being made that are

137:44

politically expedient for the people who

137:46

are making them and and so doing the

137:49

right thing always

137:52

requires some pain and always requires

137:56

some honesty on the part of the

137:59

politicians to prepare the people for

138:02

those bad things like hey this is what's

138:05

going to happen it's going to be hard

138:07

you're going to lose some money you're

138:10

going to have to work harder you're not

138:11

going to get this you're not going to

138:12

get that but years down the road you

138:15

you're you know you're going to benefit

138:16

right that's not what the voters want if

138:20

somebody else says oh that guy's full of

138:21

you don't have to do that I've got

138:23

a program for you I'm going to fix this

138:25

I'm going to give you money uh and so in

138:28

America we're going to do what's right

138:30

for the politicians we're not going to

138:32

do what's right for the country but in

138:35

China they can do what's right for the

138:37

country because they don't have to worry

138:39

about the election what they have to

138:41

worry about is the people because what

138:43

would cause a revolution in China would

138:45

be poverty and misery

138:48

and so when you're like you know a ruler

138:51

which is one of the reasons why I you

138:52

know I like you know a constitutional

138:55

monarchy I think I I I would prefer that

138:57

than to a democracy for sure you know

138:59

where you have a a king who rules but

139:02

you you limit their power uh you know

139:06

legally but a king is trying to protect

139:09

the country for his kids and his

139:11

grandkids right politicians don't give a

139:13

damn about what happens to the country

139:15

after they're dead they they're just

139:17

living for the here and now and they

139:18

can't they don't leave if you're the

139:21

president your son doesn't inherit your

139:22

presidency what do you care right but if

139:25

I'm the king of America I want my son or

139:27

my daughter to inherit a healthy viable

139:31

America I don't want a revolution right

139:33

I don't want to end up you know or my

139:35

you know with my head on a spear but so

139:37

you have a reason to try to do the right

139:40

thing for your country politicians have

139:41

kids too right yeah but they're not

139:43

going to inher politicians don't care

139:44

about their kids they don't think about

139:46

that you know well see you you know but

139:47

what's Wild is I never thought I would

139:48

come to Peter schiff's house and hear

139:50

him ADV advocate for monarchy but then

139:53

makesense I see AR also make a good

139:54

argument on it well let let's let's put

139:57

it this way if I was a king of America

140:00

how much money do you think I'd need

140:01

King in the castle King in the castle if

140:04

I was the king of America if you were

140:06

the king of America how much would you

140:07

need to live pretty good I mean would

140:09

could you live well on a billion dollars

140:11

a year oh much less yes you don't need

140:13

that much right I wouldn't need this

140:15

whole huge bureaucracy I would not need

140:17

an income tax to maintain my kingdom I

140:20

would my my subjects would be free and I

140:23

would just take a small little tax maybe

140:25

I'd have a national sales tax of a half

140:27

a percent I that's all I need I could I

140:29

could cover everything with that I cover

140:31

all my lifestyle all my parties and I

140:34

could still have Army protecting

140:35

everybody it wouldn't cost that much and

140:37

we wouldn't even need that big an army

140:39

because we no we wouldn't be making

140:40

enemies cuz we wouldn't be attacking any

140:42

so in in this shift Kingdom uh would the

140:44

currency just be gold of course I would

140:46

of course

140:48

real money oh no you don't want the

140:50

Monarch again limitations the Monarch

140:52

can't print money interesting you know

140:55

so if I if I wanted money I'd have to

140:57

collect taxes I'd have to take some of

140:58

your gold or go mine well well I don't

141:01

if I owned a mine yeah so going a little

141:03

a little more back so going back to your

141:04

thing so China China can do the right

141:07

thing okay right and again not that I'm

141:08

saying we should be communist right but

141:10

I'm just saying

141:12

that elections are not all they're

141:14

cracked up to be what what's the the

141:16

most important thing is economic freedom

141:18

so if I had a choice between political

141:21

freedom and economic freedom I take

141:23

economic freedom right so if someone say

141:25

here you can live in a country where you

141:26

can't vote but you have no income tax

141:29

you have private property you have sound

141:30

money right and you have good government

141:32

you just have no say in it or you can

141:35

live in a awful socialist country where

141:38

you know you you half your money is

141:40

taken in taxes you got all these rules

141:42

and regulations and every four years you

141:44

can vote for which socialist you want to

141:45

run the country it's whoever offers the

141:48

biggest check yeah I mean and and the

141:50

thing is like when I moved to Puerto

141:51

Rico one of the things people said well

141:53

you're going to give up your right to

141:54

vote I said well who cares I mean I

141:57

lived in Connecticut I never vote for

141:58

the winner of any election what good is

142:01

voting for The Loser right I mean I mean

142:04

maybe I could have moved to Florida and

142:06

I I could have voted for the winner but

142:08

to me all right I can't vote for the

142:11

president but no matter who W who wins

142:13

they can't tax me so what do I mean so

142:15

personally it doesn't matter cuz none of

142:17

them are going to tax me now the thing

142:19

is now the big tax that everybody has to

142:21

worry about now is inflation right so I

142:23

avoid that um with my investments but

142:26

where they get you a second time is with

142:29

the capital gains tax because inflation

142:31

makes phony gains but I have zero

142:33

capital gains in Puerto Rico so I don't

142:35

have to worry about that wow so if I buy

142:37

something for a million dollars and then

142:39

the dollar loses 90% of its value and I

142:42

sell it for 10 million but it's really

142:44

the same million that I that I invested

142:46

I don't have to worry about paying a tax

142:48

on that gain that isn't really a gain

142:50

right the government creates inflation

142:52

which benefits it and then it taxes you

142:54

on the gains that don't even exist so

142:56

the government wins twice to inflation

142:58

and you lose twice Peter how can people

143:00

follow you all right well I mean I'm on

143:04

the internet right I've got almost I've

143:06

had a I've been having a hard time

143:07

getting to a million exf followers I've

143:09

been at 990 plus thousand for a while

143:11

now every time I gain some I lose some I

143:14

don't know what's going on it's like tug

143:15

of war but um you can follow me on X

143:18

because that's where I I I I uh I put

143:21

out the most personal stuff you know but

143:23

I'm also on Facebook Instagram you know

143:26

Tik Tok I mean I'm on all the social

143:28

media so you like Elon more than Zuck it

143:30

sounds like well be well because there's

143:32

not as much going on Facebook face

143:34

people don't go to fa how often do you

143:36

go to your Facebook page what's that

143:37

yeah see but remember at one time

143:39

everybody loved Facebook yeah right just

143:41

like Bitcoin right then you know

143:43

Facebook got rid of my space do you have

143:45

an Instagram I do have instag yeah well

143:48

that'sit photos no but that's what's

143:50

saving that's what on the beach sexy

143:52

gold bars that's what saved Facebook is

143:55

he bought Instagram of course and

143:57

WhatsApp yeah he spies of the people

143:58

yeah yeah why not nobody would no and

144:00

they bought it with their their stock

144:02

right they cost their sholders paid for

144:05

it yeah yeah um but all of a sudden who

144:07

who would have seen uh Tik Tok coming

144:09

right out of the blue right Tik Tok

144:11

comes in um but so I'm on all those but

144:15

YouTube of course I I put a lot of

144:17

content there my YouTube channel that's

144:18

where my podcasts go I do the podcast

144:21

I'm doing one later today so I got to

144:22

take a break I got to save my voice

144:24

thank you do my do my own podcast later

144:26

today at shiff Radio you can listen to

144:28

it at shiff radio or on my YouTube

144:30

channel so subscribe to that and again

144:33

visit my my website europa.eu

144:46

physical precious metals shift gold

144:50

shift gold.com exactly shift

144:52

gold.com and you know they tried to get

144:54

me to buy gold.com recently and I just

144:56

didn't feel like how much do they want

144:58

like 7even million oh my gosh I don't

145:00

they kept saying oh it's a bargain it's

145:02

I don't know I mean I got shift gold

145:03

right now but um that's amazing uh yeah

145:06

so shift gold.com and I want to make it

145:08

clear this video is not sponsored thank

145:10

you for inviting us into your house uh

145:13

and thank you this was very insightful

145:15

we well thanks for thanks for coming by

145:17

right you didn't make me come all the

145:18

way out to California you guys came came

145:20

out to Puerto Rico even though I'm a

145:22

licensed financial adviser licensed real

145:24

estate broker and becoming a stock

145:25

broker this video is neither

145:27

personalized Financial nor real estate

145:29

advice for you it is not tax legal or

145:31

otherwise personalized advice tailored

145:33

to you this video provides generalized

145:35

perspective information and commentary

145:37

any third party content I show should

145:38

not be deemed endorsed by me this video

145:40

is not and shall never be deemed

145:42

reasonably sufficient information for

145:43

the purposes of evaluating a security or

145:45

investment decision any or promoted

145:47

products or either paid affiliations or

145:49

products or Services we may benefit from

145:51

I also personally operate an actively

145:53

managed ETF and hold long positions in

145:55

various Securities mentioned including

145:58

potential short positions however I have

146:02

no relationship to any issuers nor am I

146:05

presently acting as a market maker

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.