TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Q1 Earnings: The Engines That Will Drive 2026 🚀

3h 39m 59s36,448 words5,513 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Okay, everybody, welcome. This is going

0:02

to be an epic call today. This is the Q4

0:05

Tesla Q4 earnings call. Here's what's

0:08

going to happen uh later today. We're

0:10

going to have basically we're starting

0:11

now the pre-show. It's 12:30 Pacific

0:14

time. In about half an hour, Tesla will

0:16

drop their financials. We'll find out

0:18

exactly how Q4 ended up all the uh

0:21

metrics and any information. They

0:23

sometimes drop forward-looking

0:25

statements there. That will happen in 30

0:27

minutes from now. And then at uh 2:30

0:30

Pacific time, so that'll be an hour and

0:32

a half after that, two hours from today,

0:34

that will be from now, that will be the

0:37

official event. We will live stream that

0:39

right on this channel. We're

0:40

co-streaming this as well on James uh

0:43

Invest Answers channel and everyone's X

0:46

accounts. And then after about an hour,

0:49

typically they have uh retail questions

0:52

are answered, analyst questions are

0:54

answered, Elon's on the call. After

0:56

that, we will do a post show analysis

0:58

and uh figure out what happened. But I

1:00

do think this is going to be a big big

1:01

day today. So here's the round table of

1:04

who we have here today. We've got uh

1:06

Jeff Wess will be joining us later. He

1:08

is an expert in manufacturing supply

1:10

chain. Of course we have Alexander Mertz

1:13

board and governance. You got James and

1:16

Vance answers stock analysis and

1:18

finance. Cernin Basher will be joining

1:20

us later finance and robotics. Larry

1:23

Goldberg's here as well. business and

1:25

energy. And then we've got Nick Gibbs

1:27

joining us as well, investing and stock

1:30

analysis. So, welcome everybody.

1:32

Appreciate uh everybody joining today.

1:36

>> Great to be here.

1:38

>> Oh my god, Nick. Did you get a haircut?

1:40

>> I did get a haircut.

1:43

>> How's your mood, Nick? How is your mood?

1:44

You're always the one that's pivoting,

1:46

so tell us.

1:48

>> Well, now it's bad. No,

1:50

>> now it's bad. Oh, wow.

1:51

>> Now it's good. So, a great day.

1:54

Nick, you look bad day, actually.

1:57

>> You look even younger. I mean, how young

1:59

can you get?

2:01

>> Well, I'll take that as a compliment.

2:03

>> Aging.

2:04

>> Yeah.

2:05

>> How old are you? Tell us.

2:06

>> Uh 35.

2:08

>> You don't look 35.

2:10

>> Thank you.

2:11

>> That's unbelievable.

2:13

>> But um

2:14

>> No, it's actually kind of a sad day uh

2:15

on my end over here. Uh, I think most of

2:18

you know I work at AWS and we had uh

2:22

16,000 layoffs today. So, lost a lot of

2:24

friends.

2:26

>> Sorry.

2:27

>> No, you didn't lose friends. You lost

2:28

colleagues, but you kept the friends.

2:31

>> I like that.

2:32

>> That's good. I like that, Alexander.

2:34

>> Yeah.

2:35

>> How many total How many total people at

2:37

AWS? 16,000 sounds like

2:41

>> So, we did another 16,000 back in

2:43

October. So that takes us to 32,000.

2:47

Um, so AWS alone has probably like

2:52

120 maybe maybe 150,000 people roughly.

2:55

Uh AWS has like 1 or I mean Amazon has

2:58

like 1.5 million.

2:59

>> Yeah. Yeah.

3:00

>> Yeah.

3:02

>> Yeah. But who's counting, you know?

3:05

>> Sorry to hear that, Nick. But uh let's

3:07

get started with Tesla. James, did you

3:09

want to kick us off on what you're

3:10

expecting for the day?

3:12

>> Yeah, it's it's always tricky. We might

3:14

as well start with a chart to let us

3:15

know because a lot of people know should

3:17

they buy right now or not? And I always

3:20

like to look at where we are, where

3:22

we've come from. And before I just got

3:24

to get a little pet peeve out of my way.

3:26

You got a lot of people saying, "Oh,

3:28

Tesla's been dead money the last 5

3:29

years." Well, if you bought Tesla 5.7

3:33

years ago, it was $17 and it hit nearly

3:36

500. So, no, it's all about when you

3:39

time your buys. And that's why this

3:40

chart is very nice to look at over the

3:42

last 5 years. It shows you all the

3:43

layers of support and resistance. It

3:45

shows you where we've come from, where

3:47

we've gone. And by the way, my favorite

3:49

thing to trade is a volatile beast like

3:51

this because it's pretty easy to nail

3:53

tops and bottoms. Now, looking at the

3:55

chart today and trying to figure out

3:56

where we are going next is tricky

3:59

because there's so many catalysts and we

4:01

get get to the 2026 catalyst later and

4:04

other things, but right now the trend is

4:06

just turning up. It was very clear last

4:08

time we were on Herbert. Actually, I

4:09

said it was a clear short at $4.99 to

4:12

hedge Tesla and that worked out

4:14

perfectly. But now, what happens next?

4:17

So, the sentiment is so low for the

4:19

earnings and everything is kind of

4:21

priced in. Fed didn't do anything today.

4:24

We know the only way probably from here

4:26

is up and the chart tends to say that

4:28

too. It's been struggling trying to get

4:30

below 430 432 for a long time and it

4:32

tends not to go down that level. It did

4:34

hit 411 a couple of times a few weeks

4:36

ago and since then it's just under

4:40

accumulation. Um so from the chart

4:43

perspective here um and I know 70% of

4:46

earnings calls Tesla sells off

4:48

afterwards but this time could be

4:50

different. It'll all hinge on the

4:52

forward guidance the mood that Elon is

4:54

in what he says about all the catalysts

4:56

like semi FSD uptake robo taxi scaling

5:00

etc and the SpaceX dream which probably

5:02

is not going to happen. So that's the

5:04

way I see it right now.

5:07

>> Are you expecting a a jump then after

5:09

the call you

5:10

>> I expect it immediately normally when

5:12

the results come out it sells off and

5:14

then then the de deck is digested and

5:18

then it takes trad about 3 days to

5:21

understand exactly what's in the deck

5:22

where we'll decipher that and distill it

5:24

down in half an hour for you all. But uh

5:27

typically a sell-off will happen. But

5:30

but if the guidance is really strong,

5:32

you know, the six massive catalysts I

5:35

see for 2026, we'll dig into later. If

5:37

the world can wrap their head around

5:39

what's coming this year and next, it

5:42

should go up from 430.

5:44

>> Are you willing to share what trade you

5:46

made this morning?

5:48

>> Yeah, I sold a bunch of puts and bought

5:49

a bunch of calls. Uh 400 strike were the

5:54

calls and the puts were a little higher.

5:56

So break even on the trade is

5:58

>> $441

6:01

by the year by December 2027. So I got

6:05

two years to for the price of Tesla to

6:07

be above 441 which is $7 from where we

6:10

are now.

6:11

>> Yeah, sounds pretty pretty good. Okay,

6:14

let's go with you Alexandra. What are

6:16

you expecting from Elon and the board

6:18

and the executives?

6:21

You're on mute,

6:23

>> of course. Good start. Uh I actually

6:25

don't expect much today. I think we

6:27

heard a lot from Elon on his different

6:29

stages and you know where we are with

6:31

robot taxi. He was a little bit too

6:32

optimistic for the year end where robo

6:35

taxi deployment would be. So I don't

6:37

expect him to you know go much further

6:40

in his uh in his predictions. I think

6:42

this is going to be one of those

6:44

relatively muted calls. What I'm looking

6:46

for is um

6:49

on these earnings call the difference

6:51

between GAP and non-GAAP because that

6:53

will give us a first indication on how

6:55

much they have now accounted for

6:59

employee stock options including Elon's.

7:01

I think that's going to be very

7:02

interesting because since we all voted

7:04

in November to give them more or less

7:06

green light to do anything they wanted

7:08

plus the Toonetta decision in December

7:12

um this opened the floodgates to a lot

7:15

of accounting here. So I want to see how

7:17

they did that. The other thing I'm

7:19

looking in the immediate is uh free cash

7:21

flow. I think free cash flow is going to

7:23

be tough this year because there's going

7:24

to be so much investments in uh GPUs and

7:28

and other things that you know Tesla is

7:31

expanding like the craziest startup

7:33

ever. So I want to see how they

7:35

micromanage to still have some free cash

7:38

flow if they do uh because that's going

7:40

to be a a hard landing to get that right

7:43

and over all Q4 and all 2026 quarters.

7:47

And then I'm very much looking forward

7:49

to the 10K. So I I actually checked half

7:51

an hour ago um how quickly they

7:54

published the SEC findings. So those are

7:56

the edited accounts and there is so much

7:58

more information in the 10ks. I mean any

8:00

investor that takes it seriously really

8:02

should take half a day to read the 10ks.

8:04

Um and so that is coming out sometimes

8:07

the same day. Last year they managed to

8:09

do it the same day. So maybe that

8:11

happens again this year. In the years

8:13

prior it was between two and seven days

8:16

after the call. So last year was the

8:19

same day. So that is going to be a much

8:23

better source of detailed information

8:26

for deferred FSD revenue because that's

8:29

another thing to watch, right? There are

8:30

still a couple of billions lying around

8:32

that have to be at one point accounted

8:34

for. Uh obviously not all, only in the

8:36

United States, but does that start now

8:39

to melt down or not? Uh the recognition

8:41

of those uh FSD revenues. The other one

8:44

obviously stock options. We will have in

8:46

the 10k much more indication how they're

8:48

starting to allocate those stock option

8:51

possibilities they have now and in the

8:54

10k we will also have a lot of news

8:56

about ongoing litigation. So I am um you

9:01

know I'm sort of I'm always excited to

9:04

to listen to the earnings call but I'm

9:05

sort of not expecting them. I don't

9:07

expect any big news. I have one of those

9:10

questions and maybe Larry can help me. I

9:12

still don't understand why he wants to

9:14

bring uh SpaceX public. So that first

9:17

question sort of bothers me because I'm

9:19

I'm sort of not done yet with the whole,

9:22

you know, reasoning why he why he would

9:25

do that and why Tesla investors feel

9:28

they have some privilege or whatever. So

9:31

whatever it is, I'm going to listen, but

9:33

I don't expect much from today. That's

9:35

my message.

9:36

>> Can I respond to that, Herbert?

9:40

>> Please. So, the reason SpaceX is going

9:44

to go public is because it pretty much

9:46

has to.

9:48

We're moving into a completely new era

9:51

for uh SpaceX,

9:53

an era that's going to be incredibly

9:56

capital intensive,

9:58

and SpaceX's cash flow, while pretty

10:01

damn good compared to previous years,

10:05

um is nowhere near the challenge that uh

10:08

it now faces.

10:10

SpaceX is about to launch at least two

10:14

new businesses

10:17

on top of launching the largest flying

10:21

object ever made

10:23

uh at a

10:26

capital investment that is staggering.

10:29

Um they are building

10:32

currently four launch pads. They have

10:36

one that is just completed. They're

10:38

building four more launch pads, each of

10:40

which probably consume about a billion

10:43

to a billion and a half dollars by the

10:45

time they're all done.

10:47

They're building two rocket factories,

10:50

the largest rocket factories ever built

10:53

to manufacture each of them to

10:55

manufacture roughly a Starship every

11:00

couple of hours, the largest rocket ever

11:03

built. And the amount of capital that

11:05

it's going to consume

11:07

while staggering is nothing compared to

11:09

the amount of capital that they're going

11:12

to have to um shepherd together to put

11:16

uh a data center into the sky.

11:21

I'm not even talking about Starink

11:22

because Starlink is already cash flow

11:24

positive. It's the one business that's

11:26

delivering really strong cash flow. cash

11:29

flows in the past at at SpaceX have been

11:33

pretty marginal in in the kind of

11:35

dollars we're talking about now.

11:38

So there's absolutely no doubt at all in

11:42

my mind that they're going to have to

11:44

raise a minimum of 25 billion dollar.

11:49

That's not small change. That is a

11:52

massive IPO.

11:54

Um it's going to be one of the biggest

11:57

IPOs ever. Um, they may have to raise

12:01

more than that. That's just that 25

12:03

billion is if they really scrimp save

12:05

and cut cut the corners and and do all

12:08

the things SpaceX do, they may go for

12:11

more than that. They may go for as much

12:13

as double that. So, there's no doubt in

12:16

my mind that uh, you know, a real IPO is

12:22

really necessary. And if you look at the

12:24

cash flow negative

12:27

potential that the the curve goes very

12:31

steep after July this year a well after

12:34

August this year it really goes steep.

12:37

So I think this is absolutely the right

12:40

moment and the stock is I mean the

12:43

market is really really hungry for IPOs.

12:46

This can open the floodgates for IPOs

12:49

which is a reason the banks are very

12:50

active. I saw a uh a betting market

12:53

saying that it's like 80% plus chance

12:55

that the IPO will happen. And not only

12:57

will SpaceX IPO, but it'll happen in

12:59

June because it's Elon's birthday and

13:02

it's some sort of planetary

13:05

alignment.

13:06

>> There's always there's always a

13:08

planetary alignment. By the way, the one

13:10

one kind or another that's not

13:12

>> I wanted to ask the panel here. Let's go

13:14

round table. How likely is it that it's

13:17

that it's not going to be a SpaceX IPO,

13:20

but some sort of SpaceX Tesla reverse

13:22

merger or something like that? Is it 0%

13:24

chance that it'll be a Tesla SpaceX

13:27

involvement or is there some percentage

13:29

chance? What do you think, Larry? Let's

13:30

go. Let's go down the list here. Oh,

13:32

>> I think it's zero. Um, I think Elon has

13:35

made up his mind. He's brought in the

13:37

four major the five major banks that,

13:40

you know, are the banks that can can do

13:43

the heavy lift on an IPO. None of them

13:47

want complications. They've dealt with

13:49

complications with Elon before. I think

13:52

they want a very very very

13:56

uh clean IPO because it's it's not only

14:00

important for SpaceX, it's important for

14:02

them for the future of the IPO market. I

14:05

think that's a very big consideration

14:07

for them and I think they have the means

14:10

to put the kind of pressure on.

14:12

>> Alexandra,

14:14

>> I have no means of um you know seeing

14:19

how this could go. But if if Larry is

14:22

right and I do believe he's right on the

14:24

amounts if this happens, it could not be

14:27

just a reverse merger with Tesla. I mean

14:30

that doesn't bring enough cash in the in

14:33

the pockets. And if he's right that this

14:35

is going through the standard big banks,

14:37

they won't let that happen because this

14:39

is their cake. So, um,

14:43

close to zero.

14:44

>> And do and do remember when we had that

14:46

Bill Aman proposal.

14:49

>> He clearly said at one moment, stop this

14:51

all. We're not cutting corners. So,

14:53

that's it. We're not cutting corners.

14:55

>> James, never going to happen. It's too

14:57

complex, too. Doesn't fulfill the

15:00

original people that invest in SpaceX

15:02

anyway. And it dilutes too many

15:03

franchises and puts too much of a target

15:05

on Elon. Stupid idea. That was one of

15:08

the things that when Shimath came out

15:09

with that, I was like, "Dude, what are

15:10

you drinking? You and the Malfy Coast

15:12

pounding a few bottles of wine. That

15:14

doesn't make any sense. Here we are.

15:16

>> Well, you know, Tesla investors want to

15:18

This is the number one question. Uh,

15:20

Nick,

15:21

>> uh, first of all, pounding wine on the

15:23

Maui Coast makes a lot of sense to me.

15:26

And I think if anything Tesla will be

15:29

part of the IPO in the sense where they

15:32

will maybe put 5 or 10 billion into it.

15:34

I think that makes a lot more sense and

15:35

that fulfills the promise to investors.

15:39

And I think you also wouldn't want it

15:41

because if god forbid there's another,

15:44

you know, Lena, wrath of con 2.0, they

15:47

would be screwed and it get way too

15:49

political. And finally, I think July 4th

15:53

makes more sense.

15:56

250th birthday. That's true.

15:59

>> Jeeoff,

16:00

>> thought this was a Tesla earnings call.

16:02

>> Yeah, let's answer that.

16:04

>> Which is why I hate that first question.

16:06

>> This is the very first question. So, we

16:08

needed to address it that

16:09

>> the market is closed on July the 4th.

16:12

>> Jeeoff, uh, you can answer this question

16:14

and then you can go into your own

16:16

introducation spots, too. Uh,

16:19

>> your volume seems a little quiet.

16:22

All right, Herbert, just one thing after

16:24

another. Um, I think they're going to

16:25

invest

16:27

and it's going to be some some nominal

16:29

amount. I don't I don't imagine some

16:31

huge tie up at day one. There are

16:34

overlaps, but I I think it just it would

16:37

be too messy. I think there's a I think

16:38

there's a clean IPO coming for SpaceX,

16:41

but I I I wouldn't be surprised if

16:43

there's some form of Tesla involvement

16:47

uh given, you know, future convergence

16:49

and what's happening with with data

16:51

center.

16:52

>> Yeah.

16:53

>> And can I add that that first question

16:55

will never be answered. I mean, there's

16:57

no way he can answer that question.

16:59

Yeah, I agree with all the above, but we

17:02

seem to burn these questions with with

17:05

such abandon. It just disturbs me.

17:08

There's so many good questions we could

17:09

ask.

17:10

>> Exactly. We end up asking the the

17:12

questions that he can't answer or that

17:14

he has answered many times.

17:16

>> Just to update everybody, we are doing

17:18

the pre-show right now. In about 10

17:20

minutes, Tesla will drop their

17:22

financials deck. We'll dive deep into

17:23

that and and give you guys our analysis

17:25

on that. Then at 2:30 Pacific time, the

17:28

official event will launch. We'll live

17:29

stream it here and then we'll do a post

17:31

show analysis.

17:32

>> Can Can I just add Can I just add one

17:34

last comment? I I one last thought

17:37

because the SpaceX IPO keeps, you know,

17:40

occupying my brain. I think he will do

17:42

it before the midterms. I think that um

17:46

there's currently a favorable political

17:49

climate that he has to use for major

17:51

strategic moves and this is one of them.

17:53

>> Yeah, makes sense. Bitcoin.

17:56

>> James, did you want to uh set the stage

17:58

for Q4 or did you want to move to Q1?

18:03

>> You're on mute.

18:05

>> I've got a couple of things more about

18:07

setting the stage for 2026 because

18:09

people are, you know, they don't know

18:11

whether they if they have no position,

18:13

should they start a position, should

18:14

they wait for a crash to $200 or $100?

18:18

And I just like to talk about some of

18:20

the the broad topics that I see that are

18:22

very important for the future. So, we

18:24

could jump in there and then we could

18:26

drill down into who's actually buying

18:27

the stock. Very interesting data there.

18:30

How short interest has changed quarter

18:32

over quarter and everything else. But

18:33

let's start with slide nine, which I'd

18:35

love for the panel to sound in on. Oh,

18:37

you can control the slides. Good. This

18:39

one. Uh, these are what I call the big

18:42

2026 catalysts that I think are very

18:45

important. Obviously, robo taxi cyber

18:47

cab that's ramping really fast. Uh,

18:49

thank you for covering my tweet the

18:50

other day in a video, Herbert. FSD and

18:53

autonomy. I think the uptake for FSD

18:54

will be incredible. All the

18:56

non-believers I know who never believed

18:58

in FSD have gone out and bought Model

19:00

Y's and now they don't drive anymore.

19:02

Literally in the space of a month, the

19:05

flip has been incredible from anecdotal

19:07

evidence. Uh Ro Optimus Ramp um you know

19:12

Fremont scaling to maybe 1 million per

19:14

year. Lots of rumors out there as well

19:16

about all the parts and suppliers that

19:18

have been contracted with the mega pack

19:21

business. The big hyperscalers begin to

19:23

understand they get more bang for their

19:24

electricity buck which is a bottleneck

19:27

by buying mega packs. That's going to be

19:29

huge. The new semi not to be

19:31

understated. Shout out to Bill Gates who

19:32

said it would never be possible. And

19:34

then the rest the convergence and the

19:37

synergy across the Musk industries I

19:39

think are huge very big right now. So

19:43

they be kind of the big and we can drill

19:45

into any of these or all of them at the

19:48

same time but I think these are the big

19:49

topics for 2026 that are going to hit in

19:53

2026. There may not be retail sale of

19:56

Optimus robots as we learned from the

19:58

Davos event but they are definitely

20:00

going to be deploying them in their own

20:02

factories may already be doing so for

20:04

productive labor and there'll be a lot

20:06

more of that coming very quickly.

20:09

Thoughts? I I I have one thought. I

20:13

think I think we're missing what may

20:16

become a very important catalyst

20:20

and it is around

20:25

AI5

20:27

the progress towards AI5

20:30

data the possibility of a chip fab.

20:34

>> Yes. Well, I didn't put that I didn't

20:36

put that in purposely because this is

20:38

only talking 2026 catalyst. I don't

20:41

think any of that is going to hit and

20:42

have any material impact in the year

20:44

2026. 2027, yes, we agree, but not this

20:48

year.

20:48

>> I think I think the announcement though

20:50

could come this year and I think the

20:52

announcement could be in itself a

20:54

catalyst particularly if the

20:56

announcement is tied with the SpaceX

20:59

announcement. That's just

21:01

>> I may be wrong.

21:02

>> Yeah. And I've I've done the math on

21:03

that is like what happens if Tesla could

21:06

match Nvidia around future chip scale.

21:10

AI5, AI 6, 78, Space, Optimus, Cars,

21:16

Dojo 3 is back. That that basically adds

21:19

$1,500 to stock price in two years.

21:23

That's that's the craziness of the

21:25

numbers behind this. But over to you

21:26

guys,

21:30

>> Jeff.

21:32

>> Oh, how you doing?

21:33

>> What are we missing?

21:35

>> I mean, I a couple just a couple of

21:37

comments like the the boring thing of

21:40

kind of where most of their earnings are

21:41

coming from today with which is to me

21:44

more of a present value thing, not a

21:46

future value thing. I actually think

21:48

they're going to be flat to slightly up

21:50

on on vehicles. That'll be interesting,

21:52

including the cyber cab. It' be

21:54

interesting to see what they say about

21:56

that. For whatever reason, you know,

21:58

there's a lot of the analyst community

22:01

hangs on that. I think part of it is is

22:02

is cash to fund, you know, the rest of

22:05

these endeavors in the business. So, I

22:07

see flat to slightly up. And just a

22:09

couple other comments. I think there's

22:11

um there's there's negative pressure in

22:15

it's happening in every downward

22:17

pressure in every single region. If you

22:19

look at it from an incentives

22:21

perspective of what's happening in China

22:23

as of January 1st there's a reduction in

22:25

incentives of course in the US what's

22:28

happened and in in Western Europe.

22:31

However, I think it's an interesting

22:32

thing because that's all that gets

22:34

discussed about Tesla in in context of

22:37

EVs is the loss of incentives. But

22:39

what's not what's underdised is the

22:41

retrenchment of all the existing Western

22:44

European auto manufacturers and US auto

22:47

manufacturers. Yep.

22:49

>> From EV production and quite frankly an

22:52

undercurrent and in real economic

22:55

trouble and fracture for several of the

22:58

big names in China. It it's what what's

23:02

easy for the media to do is count number

23:04

of units and say China is great and

23:06

perfect and dominating and part of that

23:09

is infiltrated in terms of the media and

23:11

sponsorship and so forth. A lot of it

23:14

isn't real. And when you go under you go

23:16

under look a couple layers deep there's

23:18

real economic problems with some of the

23:20

major Chinese EV auto manufacturers.

23:23

There's been a lot of intervention from

23:25

the CCP. So just anyway auto units I

23:27

know kind of a boring conversation but I

23:30

think um you know a little bit more

23:32

commentary of of what I see on that.

23:35

>> Yeah and two things to add to that

23:37

Jeeoff you're dead right. We've gone

23:38

from the competition has coming to the

23:40

competition has left the building with

23:41

the exception of BY selling $10,000

23:43

cars, but they're not in the same

23:44

market. And uh the second thing, we now

23:48

have beneath price parodel

23:52

Y. Try find a car on the market that can

23:55

do what that car can do, even remotely

23:57

close to that price. It's not possible.

23:59

True.

24:01

>> Yes. And and the other quick comment on

24:04

in BYYD is as they've grown their units,

24:06

their income has reduced and their

24:08

income per vehicle has reduced and their

24:11

gross margins have reduced. So that

24:13

tells you that there was underlying

24:15

issues with channel inventory, with cash

24:18

conversion, with how they're essentially

24:21

running their business. And when they

24:22

had to start paying suppliers, they ran

24:24

into issues. I just think for this call,

24:26

the setup for this call is Elon's mood.

24:30

It should be quite good. In the last

24:32

couple of weeks, he's literally talked

24:35

about doubledigit GDP growth happening

24:38

over what the next 12 to 18 months,

24:41

which could be at one point of this

24:43

year. Double. So, if you're if you're

24:45

project, remember in 2022 he was

24:47

projecting uh you know darker times for

24:52

the economy and some of that came to

24:54

fruition and now he's talking about

24:56

double-digit GDP growth. So, if you're

24:58

projecting double- digit GDP growth,

25:00

you're probably coming in overall in a

25:02

decent mood. And he's in the zone. He's

25:04

he's back at his companies. He's

25:07

building. So, I actually think he's

25:09

going to be in a pretty solid mood. And

25:12

he in terms of his future projections,

25:14

I'd have to think that they're they're

25:16

quite positive. I do think there needs

25:18

to be a reckoning in more near-term

25:20

milestones of what's happening with robo

25:22

taxi because I think a lot of the

25:25

investment community takes what he says

25:27

is verbatim writes them down in a

25:29

spreadsheet and when they're not hit

25:32

it's like hey you said this and this

25:34

happened what you'll hear me talk about

25:36

is these things that have never been

25:37

done before in the world and the way

25:39

that Tesla is doing them there's going

25:40

to be some guard band around that so

25:42

it'll be interesting to see what he

25:44

talks about in terms of the state of the

25:46

acceleration of robo taxian deployment.

25:48

We've seen some acceleration in the last

25:51

week, but uh I think there needs to get

25:53

into a little bit more near-term

25:55

commentary of more near-term milestones

25:58

on that. I'll pause.

26:04

>> Thanks. Good stuff.

26:05

>> Yep. So, in about a minute or so,

26:07

sometimes it's about two or three

26:08

minutes after the hour, that's when

26:10

we'll see a download version and we'll

26:12

take a look at the PDF. Anybody else

26:14

want to make uh comments?

26:16

One risk that I think we should consider

26:19

is that there may be a layoff round

26:22

that Elon announces in this uh

26:26

>> I agree with you. I was thinking about

26:28

that. It's usually a little bit later,

26:29

right? It's between February and April

26:31

usually he does it.

26:33

>> Right. Right. Right. It's not normally

26:35

in the first quarter, but I mean it's

26:38

two years since the last big layoff

26:39

round and you know he he is a creature

26:42

of habit.

26:44

>> Yeah. and and there will be one. It's

26:46

just he believes in this type of

26:49

management where there is a at least

26:51

once a year cleanout

26:54

sometimes overreaching he rehiring

26:56

people but it happens it happens

26:59

regularly. You're right.

27:02

>> Anybody have any predictions for Q4?

27:04

>> Yeah.

27:05

>> Oh, just one more quick comment just on

27:07

on energy on in Davos. Elon said, "We're

27:10

reaching a point this year where there's

27:12

going to be not enough power to light up

27:14

the GPUs that are in that are under

27:16

production and on their way for

27:18

delivery." That's a critical turning

27:20

point for this industry. It may come up

27:22

on the other Mag 7 meta Microsoft calls

27:25

as well. that could be a critical

27:27

turning point and have you know if that

27:29

turns into that is a bottleneck coming

27:31

that could be I don't know if it's going

27:32

to be as much of a Tesla it may come up

27:34

on the Tesla call but it just speaks to

27:36

the pressure on Tesla energy to scale up

27:39

that Houston factory and to scale up LFP

27:41

production in the US

27:47

>> yeah watching that Tesla energy revenue

27:50

is going to be that important

27:54

>> yeah my my question on that one is what

27:55

was transfer pricing from uh Tesla to

28:00

XAI for the 500 megap packs. Did they

28:03

charge full whack or discounted rate?

28:06

They they've got to show they've got to

28:08

show that the price that they sold to to

28:12

their related company or their

28:15

shareholder related company was at

28:17

equivalent to the rates that they sold

28:20

to other large clients. So it it would

28:24

be very difficult for them to do

28:25

anything else.

28:27

>> Yeah.

28:27

>> Hey, real quick just uh this is just

28:30

kind of breaking. Uh Tesla started

28:32

informing customers through sales

28:33

advisers that there was a mislabeling of

28:36

AP45, meaning there is currently no

28:39

hardware 4.5. All vehicles delivered

28:42

today have AI4, hardware 4. Tesla will

28:45

update all labels, etc. to eliminate any

28:47

confusion moving forward.

28:49

>> Yeah, that was about time. I mean, that

28:51

was such a mess.

28:52

>> So, there is no 4.5. Okay.

28:54

>> No, that's just as well.

28:56

>> Sometimes retail analysts are too

28:59

analytic.

29:00

>> Work in a work in a factory and tell me

29:02

how that happened. Uh, anyway, um, I can

29:05

see it happening, by the way, if there

29:07

were two SKs and just one not ready for

29:10

production. But, I don't know. It'd be

29:12

interesting to to see what happened

29:14

behind the curtain on that one. I

29:17

>> Anyway, we're earnings are imminent

29:19

here. Looks like Microsoft just smashed

29:22

EPS by the way. And uh looks like Meta

29:25

did as well, FYI.

29:29

>> It's good for the whole space. And but

29:30

and also S&P 500 broke 7,000 today as

29:33

well. And the Fed had no impact on

29:35

things which is good.

29:37

>> But we're not expecting good u good news

29:39

for Q4 2025, right, for Tesla?

29:42

>> No. 44 cents, 45 cents and that'll be

29:46

>> that's even that's even highend. I think

29:48

it it could be even as low as 40 cents

29:50

and that's still okay. It depends.

29:52

There's some surprise kickers. You know,

29:53

FSD uptake is pure margin. Mega pack, a

29:56

lot of margin there. That could offset

29:58

the weakness in the cars.

30:00

>> Did have you guys allowed for the

30:02

reduction in the value of the crypto?

30:08

>> Oh, that

30:08

>> that's going to go straight to the

30:10

bottom line. Straight to the

30:11

>> It does. It does. But um I mean, again,

30:14

just calling that to everybody else who

30:16

who reads those now. Don't look at the

30:20

gap number. Look at the non-GAAP number.

30:22

The difference is mainly how much now

30:24

they are allocating in stock options is

30:27

not real cash. That is

30:31

policy and politics. So let's wait for

30:33

the 10K until we understand more of

30:35

that. But don't worry about that

30:37

difference when it comes out now. Just

30:40

concentrate on the non-GAAP for the

30:41

moment.

30:43

>> And then Nick, you're following closely

30:45

what's happening with this stock and

30:47

what's your prediction? Oh,

30:50

>> give me one second. I'm trying to hear

30:51

what they're saying on CNBC.

30:55

>> Oh, it is here.

31:01

>> Oh, man.

31:04

>> Got the deck.

31:05

>> It's there. You got it

31:06

>> for I'm afraid it can't do that. It's

31:08

not. It says it's there, but it's not.

31:10

Yeah. Or else the system is crashing

31:12

because

31:12

>> same with me. Yeah.

31:13

>> We're all doing the same thing trying to

31:14

grab it. Yeah.

31:16

>> It says it's there, but it's not.

31:19

Sometimes you can right mouse click the

31:21

link and save link.

31:22

>> I'm doing I'm doing both.

31:24

>> And it still says 404.

31:27

No.

31:36

Tesla turn negative slightly down one

31:42

160.

31:45

>> It's actually good. I didn't see that

31:47

before that on this table further to the

31:49

right Herbert you now have the consensus

31:51

numbers there as well the page is

31:55

actually bigger and so after the SEC

31:57

filings on the right you have

31:59

>> I can't get there right now

32:01

>> yeah there you now have a column saying

32:03

consensus so that's good

32:05

>> are you sure Tesla's out

32:09

>> well the link is out the file's not

32:11

there

32:12

>> the link is out but the file's not

32:14

connected out

32:18

and I've got another place I'm searching

32:20

to.

32:20

>> Let me text. Let me text. Uh

32:23

>> yeah,

32:23

>> text me.

32:25

>> No, not you.

32:26

>> I know. I know.

32:36

>> Cue the meme of that guy standing behind

32:38

the data center with all the cables

32:40

looking at it with his hands on his

32:42

waist.

32:46

So, Meta, Microsoft, and Tesla are all

32:48

going down in after hours.

32:50

>> Well, there could be some pin action

32:51

there, too.

32:53

>> Wow.

32:53

>> Yeah.

32:55

>> Yeah.

32:56

>> Tesla's down pretty good.

32:59

>> Uh, three bucks.

33:01

>> $3 is nothing.

33:03

>> Okay, here we go.

33:05

No,

33:05

>> you got it.

33:06

>> Nope. Thought so. It It changed for a

33:08

second, then it went back.

33:10

>> No, I I did send a message to Travis.

33:13

Guys, Metas increased their uh capital

33:16

expenditures estimate to 115 billion for

33:20

the year from what?

33:22

>> I mean, they are crazy.

33:23

>> 105 billion.

33:26

>> So, for some reason Tesla's now positive

33:28

in after hours.

33:29

>> And you thought the IPO with 25 billion

33:32

was a lot. Um, Larry.

33:36

>> Okay. Just in they beat

33:38

>> 50 based beat 40 expected. Told you I

33:42

said 45

33:43

>> 50. Wow.

33:44

>> Revenue 24.9 versus 24.7. This is that

33:48

FSD is pure margin and mega pack. When

33:50

we get into the deck, we can prove that.

33:52

But I think that was the secret.

33:54

>> I still can't

33:55

>> in my area. Sorry, Alexander. I'm so

33:58

sorry for you. Disappointed.

33:59

>> Oh, no. I'm happy.

34:00

>> Where are you getting it from, James?

34:02

Are you getting

34:03

>> the internet?

34:04

>> Okay. So, somebody else was able to get

34:05

it though.

34:06

>> Yeah. Wait, let me try. I'll share it in

34:08

the comments on YouTube.

34:10

>> Oh, yeah. Now it's up 437.

34:14

>> There we are. I I Can somebody email to

34:17

me if you've got it? I don't know.

34:21

Email 1800 herbert.com

34:24

>> on top and bottom line.

34:26

>> It's now over 10 bucks.

34:28

>> Oh yeah.

34:30

>> Remember remember what I said at the

34:32

beginning of this call? I said the

34:34

sentiment is so bad.

34:37

>> Probably the only way is up and there

34:39

could be Download it, guys. It's

34:41

somebody.

34:42

>> You're going to have Mag 7. You're going

34:44

to have people selling. Looks like

34:46

they're selling Microsoft at the moment,

34:48

right?

34:49

>> Meta at the moment.

34:51

>> And they're looking for

34:53

>> Tesla's up 16 after hours, ladies and

34:55

gentlemen.

34:56

>> Nice. Good thing.

34:59

>> Yeah.

35:00

>> Gross margins improved.

35:02

>> Never listen to me. Okay. If if somebody

35:06

has can you share your screen if you've

35:08

got info somewhere?

35:10

>> Apparently it says in the deck that

35:13

cyber cabab mega pack and robot taxis

35:15

are all on track for 2022.

35:19

>> That's not highlight

35:26

guys.

35:27

>> Anybody else able to do it?

35:30

>> Is anybody on the see whether I have it

35:32

on fintech? Give me a second.

35:44

So CNBC must have spent four seconds on

35:46

it because they're already on.

35:48

Interesting. Not surprising.

35:51

>> Oh, Meta is crushing it.

35:57

So

36:08

that's pressure.

36:29

There already a lot of guys trying to

36:32

downplay the results on X. There must be

36:35

steaming.

36:36

>> Oh,

36:37

>> see the steam coming from their ears.

36:39

>> I've been wondering about that. We had

36:41

we had a lot of EDS, you know, 12 to 15

36:44

months ago, but ever since Elon has been

36:47

hanging out of the White House again,

36:48

it's kind of amped up. Has anybody

36:50

noticed that?

36:51

>> Yeah. Yeah, for sure. For sure. It's

36:53

fun. fun to watch.

36:55

>> Other people say that they're able to

36:56

download it. So, how do we get access to

36:59

it?

37:00

>> Refresh.

37:01

>> I'm refreshing.

37:04

>> I got the deck.

37:06

>> You got the deck. Okay. Can you

37:08

>> email it? Can you email it to me?

37:12

>> Email it.

37:12

>> How did you get it, Nick?

37:15

>> Just clipped it.

37:17

>> And it doesn't work here.

37:19

>> Try a different browser perhaps.

37:21

Herbert.

37:21

>> All right.

37:23

Oh, good idea. Okay, but can you email

37:26

it to me? Um,

37:34

>> no, it doesn't work in different

37:35

browser.

37:40

>> You want me to share my screen?

37:42

>> Yes.

37:42

>> Yeah,

37:43

>> you control it then. But I still want

37:45

it.

37:46

>> Well, okay. Well,

37:48

>> he'll he'll give you one Bitcoin for it.

37:51

Perfect.

37:54

>> Worth a pizza. Just worth a pizza.

37:56

>> Sure. Let's go.

37:58

>> Yeah. Okay. Just share it. I'll I'll get

38:00

it some other time.

38:07

>> Not a ripping.

38:10

>> Can you share it?

38:12

>> Work on it, homie.

38:15

>> Herbert.

38:19

>> No.

38:20

to deck with it.

38:26

>> There we go. All right.

38:28

>> There we go.

38:33

>> I'll be your hand. You tell me what to

38:34

do. Herbert,

38:35

>> uh, we usually go right to the Outlook.

38:40

>> Outlook.

38:42

>> Yeah.

38:47

>> Love to see that energy ribbon. I got

38:49

it.

38:52

>> 14 backseat drivers.

38:55

>> 1.1 billion energy margin gross profit.

39:00

>> It works now.

39:01

>> Okay, I got it.

39:03

>> No, it's okay. Just keep keep showing

39:05

until I get it.

39:06

>> All right. Well,

39:09

>> yeah, it does. Boom. Okay.

39:11

>> Automotive sales declined sequentially.

39:15

>> That's fun. Gross margin even when

39:18

excluding the impact regatory credits

39:20

improved. Oh, that's nice.

39:28

>> Okay. Preparations continue. North

39:30

America for production ramped

39:32

>> free cash flow 1.4 billion. That's

39:34

massive.

39:35

>> Wow.

39:37

>> So many people calling for zero or

39:39

negative.

39:39

>> I know. I I thought it would it would be

39:41

really zero or slightly negative. That

39:44

is really good. 1.42. Of course,

39:49

>> in Q1 of this year, we plan to unveil

39:51

the Gen 3 version of Optimus. So, that

39:53

sounds like it's on plan.

39:59

>> I'd like to go back as well and remind

40:00

everybody, Elon Musk said 2026 would be

40:04

off the hook and 2027 even crazier. So,

40:09

>> oh, look at this. This is the first time

40:10

they have uh robotics under the

40:13

installed annual manufacturing capacity

40:15

and they have construction.

40:17

>> Oh wow.

40:18

>> Good.

40:20

>> What are the non-believers going to say

40:22

now, Nick?

40:24

>> Um

40:27

>> Oh no.

40:28

>> Oh, and active FSD subscriptions are up

40:30

to 1.1 million um year up 38%. And they

40:37

are they are now showing them they're

40:39

now showing them on page six in the

40:41

middle.

40:43

>> Is there a investment in XAI?

40:47

>> No. Don't don't don't don't don't.

40:54

>> Yep.

40:56

Two billion to acquire shares of Series

40:59

E preferred XAI stock as part of a

41:01

recently publicly disclosed financing

41:03

round.

41:06

You were joking, right?

41:07

>> No. Under other updates.

41:10

>> The catch.

41:10

>> Where is that? What page is that? Let's

41:12

take a look.

41:13

>> It's under other updates. Page 12. First

41:17

paragraph.

41:18

>> Oh my god.

41:20

>> Yeah, that's great.

41:20

>> Oh my god.

41:22

>> It's only two.

41:24

>> Relax. Relax.

41:25

>> Huge.

41:27

>> Well, two billion is a spit in the

41:29

bucket. But you have to remember as well

41:31

the relative valuation of of XAI

41:34

compared to ChachiT OpenAI which is

41:36

going down the toilet probably uh is

41:38

quite small like it depends what was the

41:40

valuation did it say Jeeoff was it 200

41:41

billion or 250 billion

41:43

>> 230 230

41:45

>> 230 okay that's good because we know if

41:48

if open AI is worth

41:51

>> 800 billion 600 billion we know XAI is

41:55

worth more so buying at that valuation

41:57

is like putting four billion into Agree.

42:00

>> Oh, I'm so pleased this finally worked.

42:02

I was so worried after the shareholder

42:05

meeting that we wouldn't get green light

42:06

for that. This is this is really good

42:08

news.

42:09

>> FS subscriptions more than doubled in

42:11

2025.

42:12

>> Yeah.

42:13

>> And that's why that's why they're seeing

42:15

the huge uptick now. That's why they're

42:16

killing the $8,000 deal.

42:20

>> We're we're still at 444. This is really

42:23

good. The verbiage has changed a little

42:25

bit to Cybergab production and se Tesla

42:28

semi to they say first half 2026. It

42:30

used to be April for the Cyber Cab.

42:32

>> Yeah.

42:34

>> So they're putting a bit of wiggle room

42:35

in there, but that's okay.

42:42

>> Did it I mean I know he said April, but

42:44

did the last earnings print say April

42:46

for Cyber Cap or did it say

42:48

>> No. No, it's it just said 2026.

42:52

Yeah. So, I think they're they may have

42:55

narrowed it from the We have to look at

42:56

the last one and see.

42:57

>> Yeah.

42:57

>> And they're still at 44.1 billion after

43:00

dropping two billion in XAI of cash,

43:03

which is big. Um, where's the Bitcoin

43:06

hit?

43:11

>> You know, you would think Micron just

43:12

dropped earnings

43:13

>> all at the bottom.

43:14

>> Look, look at this uh future planned.

43:16

It's like by the by the first quarter of

43:19

this year, it's going to skyrocket up to

43:21

250,000. That's fantastic.

43:25

H100 equivalents.

43:27

>> Oh,

43:27

>> I'm still not over that. We are at 1.42

43:32

billion free cash flow. This is so

43:35

massive. You have no idea. This is

43:36

really incredibly good number.

43:39

>> And and and and 20.1% gross margin.

43:42

Again, look at the

43:43

>> look at the low channel inventory. I

43:46

haven't looked at the the um the total

43:49

factory inventory on here yet, but

43:52

you're if you leave you exit a Q4 like

43:54

that with 15 days of inventory, you're

43:57

you're going to be doing something

43:59

special on cash unless you you know.

44:01

>> Yeah. So, for a robotic,

44:04

>> also to let you know, you remember how

44:06

regulatory credits ended? Well, they

44:09

they actually are up. They're up from

44:11

417

44:13

million the quarter before to now 542.

44:16

Yeah, but the ZEV credits did not end.

44:19

ZE credits have not.

44:20

>> Yes, but they were

44:23

everybody expected them to go down.

44:26

>> Well, I didn't because everybody

44:28

everybody else is exiting EVs and so the

44:31

more they exit EVs, the higher Z credits

44:34

they have to pay. I I had Z credits

44:36

going up. So for robotics, they plan to

44:40

unveil Optimus Gen 3 this quarter and

44:44

it's designed for mass production and

44:46

the start of production by the end of

44:48

this year.

44:50

Eventually 1 million robots per year.

44:52

That's the line that's being built now.

44:54

So that's it's huge.

44:57

Okay, let's go through this one more

44:58

time.

45:00

Yeah, free cash flow 6.4. So what

45:03

happened here, man? That's like whoa.

45:07

Oh, that's all of the 1.4 and Q4. Okay,

45:11

that's great.

45:12

>> So, all the numbers look good, right?

45:14

>> Yeah.

45:15

>> Correct.

45:16

>> Wow.

45:16

>> Numbers look really excellent. I mean,

45:19

they are

45:20

>> sales depth. Yeah.

45:22

>> Better than anybody I know forecast.

45:26

>> Yeah. And we're now sitting on 44

45:28

billion.

45:29

>> 44 billion of cash.

45:31

>> Of cash. Yeah.

45:32

So that

45:34

>> is interesting that that at least their

45:37

their factory inventory their total four

45:39

wall inventory

45:41

>> is up I would say rather significantly

45:44

quarter quarter. Now, that could be

45:46

getting ready for cyber cap ramp. That

45:48

could be, you know, bringing in more

45:50

batteries, especially pre-ar uh the

45:52

tariff going up in January for LFP cells

45:56

out of China. But it's it's up I mean

45:58

from

45:59

>> well, it's 12.3, right?

46:02

>> Well, ending six billion

46:04

in

46:06

like third quarter to 76 billion. So,

46:08

that's interesting. That again that's

46:10

not

46:11

>> um anyway that's that's all

46:13

>> no the inventory

46:16

>> correct yeah

46:20

>> this is the most important line cyber

46:22

cap semi mega are on schedule for volume

46:25

production starting in 2026

46:28

first half 2026

46:31

>> where did it say that said just starting

46:33

in 2026

46:34

>> no I thought could have somewhere else

46:36

first half yeah hang

46:38

>> okay

46:38

>> must say somewhere. We just had a back

46:40

and forth about it. Okay.

46:44

>> Okay. There was a net gain in digital

46:47

assets.

46:51

>> That's weird.

46:53

>> This I think the street's going to like

46:55

the 20.1% non-GAAP gross margin.

46:59

>> Yeah. Yeah. It's huge. I mean, it's

47:02

amazing.

47:03

Oh, did I don't know if you guys talked

47:05

about this, but did you see the planned

47:07

robo taxi coverage?

47:08

>> No. Where is that?

47:11

Uh,

47:13

>> right there. You pass it down.

47:16

>> Down.

47:18

Down.

47:19

>> Right there. Bottom right.

47:23

>> Oh, planned robo taxi miles.

47:26

>> Okay. No,

47:27

>> forget miles. Oh.

47:29

>> Oh, planned robo taxi coverage.

47:31

>> There you go.

47:35

Let's go Tampa. That's me, baby.

47:38

>> There you go. That's actually Tampa and

47:40

Orlando are the only two that are really

47:42

surprised, aren't they?

47:43

>> No.

47:44

>> First half, that's a huge number of

47:47

first half.

47:48

>> Kathy Woods is here and Larry Goldberg

47:49

comes down all the time. So, it makes

47:50

sense to have

47:51

>> No, I I No, I understand it. But

47:53

actually, we knew all these cities other

47:55

than Orlando and Tampa is what I'm

47:57

saying.

47:57

>> Yes. I've been posting pictures of the

48:00

the validating testers. So

48:04

>> guys, these are dates. These are first

48:06

half dates. I mean, this is

48:09

>> Yeah, it's a lot more than just Elon

48:11

saying it. This is on an earning, right?

48:14

What's the legality of that, Alexandra?

48:16

When it shows up on this kind of

48:17

>> Oh, now now it's binding. I mean, it of

48:19

course they can have delays, but they

48:20

will have to explain them if there are

48:22

delays because this is now written in

48:24

stone first.

48:26

>> It's not B. We shouldn't say it's

48:27

binding, I think.

48:29

>> Yeah.

48:30

Why are they testing in Mr. Lutz's

48:33

hometown and in Buffalo, New York and

48:36

places and they're not listed here?

48:37

Anybody idea?

48:38

>> Because they're probably not ready for

48:40

first half 2026 with regulators.

48:42

>> Yeah. Are they waiting for the snow

48:43

gear?

48:44

>> You also wouldn't want to start there,

48:46

right? You want to do sunny areas before

48:49

you go there.

48:50

>> Yeah, for sure.

48:54

>> Yeah, we don't have Whimo yet either.

48:58

Yeah, that is correct. There's a there's

49:00

a con a comment here. I don't have the

49:02

hand anymore on the comments. Uh

49:04

Herbert, so if you can put it in. It's

49:06

uh I am old AF saying the two billion

49:10

XAI commitment. Um I didn't say it. Um

49:14

was on 16th of January. So it has

49:16

nothing to do with the 31st of December

49:18

2025 financial results. So that is

49:21

correct. Um it doesn't matter because

49:23

the

49:25

it doesn't even say that there was any

49:26

payment or any pay um you know anything

49:29

exchanged yet. It was just the contract

49:31

signing.

49:32

>> It's not on the it's not on the cash

49:34

flow statements.

49:36

>> Exactly. Because it's January because

49:38

it's January anyway. It's not December

49:42

now. I was looking at the stock options.

49:48

>> Oh, you want to talk stock options? We

49:49

can talk stock.

49:50

>> Yeah. Because you see you see on page

49:52

five you have the net income

49:54

attributable to to common stockholders

49:56

gap and below the the line non-GAAP and

49:59

the difference of these two which is 2

50:01

billion

50:03

is going to be mainly explained by

50:06

issued stock options. So um I think that

50:09

is very interesting but like I said it's

50:11

going to take us until 10k until we

50:14

really know more about it. But that is a

50:16

huge number two billion.

50:19

Yeah, but that's that's the black shells

50:21

valuation of the stock options that

50:24

they're estimating. So, exactly

50:26

>> that two billion could represent 20 10

50:30

to 20 billion dollars of stock options.

50:32

>> This is my favorite earnings call so

50:34

far. All right, we've got the robo taxi

50:37

plan for scaling. I just heard someone

50:40

talk about Black Scholes on the earnings

50:41

call. Everything's ripping up. This is

50:44

awesome.

50:46

No.

50:46

>> Yeah, except for the Amazon news you had

50:48

today.

50:50

>> Yeah, but this is awesome.

50:53

>> This is awesome, but it really isn't

50:55

the, you know, the main event. The main

50:57

event is which Elon shows up. So, if you

51:02

have an awesome result and Elon's in a

51:05

bad mood, stocks going to tank. If you

51:08

have this and and a bright shiny Elon

51:13

chful bright shiny Elon pops up, I mean

51:17

the stock can rip.

51:18

>> Oh, I'm with you, Larry. But it doesn't

51:20

matter because I've got a bunch of leaps

51:22

on Meta right now that are playing out

51:24

really well and and I didn't get laid

51:27

off today as part of the 16,000. So

51:30

Nick, you you just can't doesn't matter

51:32

what Elon says. Can't damp

51:33

>> exactly what Nick says. Exactly. Don't

51:35

don't care about Elon's mood. carry

51:36

about Nick's mood. That's all you need.

51:38

>> Yeah.

51:41

>> APAC was very strong record vehicle

51:43

deliveries in Asia Pacific region in Q4.

51:46

That's important.

51:47

>> Yeah. Yeah. That's something that I

51:50

Yeah,

51:53

>> there's a lot in this report. I mean,

51:54

there is

51:55

>> there's a bunch for Q1 installed

51:58

capacity

52:01

>> uh of 4680 of cathode material. There's

52:04

a lot of data in this report.

52:07

I don't think this report could have

52:09

been better

52:11

for the end of 24 2025

52:16

and getting us ready for 2026 which is

52:19

this huge year for us. So this is

52:21

setting the stage in the best possible

52:24

manner.

52:26

>> Larry, if you combine this chart here

52:29

says cortex one is now greater than

52:31

100,000 H100 equivalents.

52:33

>> Yeah. Yeah.

52:34

>> And then cortex 2 is in construction.

52:35

But if you see here that it's going to

52:38

jump in March. Is that cortex 2 or is it

52:41

going to be cortex one?

52:43

>> I think it's got to be cortex 2. There's

52:46

no way that that's cortex one. There's

52:48

no way. Yeah, that that is a lot of I

52:52

mean that's

52:53

>> a lot

52:54

>> almost as many process almost as much

52:56

processing capacity as already exists.

53:00

>> Yeah. So, um, there's no doubt this is

53:02

Cortex 2. I mean, Cortex 2 is massive.

53:05

I, you know, I've said this.

53:11

>> Did we lose you? Yeah, we lost.

53:13

>> Oh, there he is.

53:16

>> Anyone else noticed?

53:18

>> Oh, go ahead, Larry.

53:19

I'm just saying the the the volume of

53:22

the factory is gigantic and they're

53:26

putting in black wheels which means

53:27

every processor is, you know, eight

53:30

times more powerful than the processes

53:32

they're using in Cortex one. So it's

53:34

it's gigantic.

53:37

If you go back up on page four, third

53:40

line from the bottom, capital

53:41

expenditure,

53:43

you saw that they spent six billion in

53:46

the first quarter, no sorry, in in the

53:48

whole of 2021,

53:49

7 billion in the whole of 2022, nearly 9

53:52

billion in 23, 11 billion in 24 capital

53:57

expenditure.

53:57

>> Yeah, I'm here

53:59

and only 8.5 that announced it would be

54:03

between 9 and 10 in 2025.

54:07

So they I don't know whether they slowed

54:09

down, didn't get what they wanted, but I

54:11

I had expected that capital expenditure

54:14

uh number to be closer to 10 billion.

54:17

>> I'll tell you why. Because cortex is not

54:20

yet ready. They planned Cortex to be

54:23

ready and for the black holes to be

54:25

installed. So it's going to hit hard in

54:28

Q.

54:29

>> Yeah. And that's what save probably free

54:31

cash flow.

54:32

>> Yeah. Yeah. I agree with that.

54:34

>> Exactly. It's not the same. It's the

54:37

annual page. So, it's one page. It's one

54:38

page further.

54:40

>> We're gonna see

54:42

>> mega mega pack and mega block production

54:44

is starting in Houston this year. That's

54:47

also very big.

54:48

>> Yeah.

54:49

>> Oh, yeah. I mean, they have a need for

54:50

capital expenditure this year. We have

54:53

seen nothing yet. We have

54:54

>> everything's happening this year.

54:56

>> I know. So, that's why free cash flow is

54:59

such a is always an important number,

55:01

but this year it's the number to watch.

55:04

Oops. Maybe Nick's being laid off.

55:08

>> No, he's so rich now. He's going.

55:11

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Getting a drink.

55:13

>> I do. I do have a slide.

55:14

>> 35. You're still impressed.

55:16

>> They did mention the lithium production

55:17

as well. But one thing is uncanny. If

55:20

you can pop up that slide for a second.

55:22

Guess what? Elon is always in the right

55:24

place at the right time. Look at the

55:26

lithium

55:27

>> hydroxide prices

55:29

>> pop in China. And guess who is the, you

55:33

know, does BY have a lithium hydroxide

55:35

factory that kicks off all of the waste

55:38

to turn into cement as well at the same

55:39

time using a very environmentally

55:41

friendly method?

55:42

>> No, I don't think so.

55:43

>> They produce their own they produce

55:46

their own, you know, end to end cells.

55:48

Can is my volume okay? I'm getting a lot

55:50

of Yeah, it's perfect.

55:50

>> It's very good. It's very good.

55:52

>> Okay.

55:53

>> Slow at the low at the beginning, but I

55:54

think that's big point. Jeff, it's still

55:56

low. Jeff,

55:57

>> tell us about the lithium. They can make

55:58

a million cars a day from their scale

56:00

their

56:01

>> Well, I think people get confused with

56:02

these graphs because there's two sets of

56:04

graphs out there. This is the right

56:06

graph to look at which is the lithium

56:08

hydroxide which is taking lithium from

56:10

the ground and actually proc this is

56:12

processed lithium. What people are

56:15

looking at is they're looking at uh a

56:17

delay in the process and they're looking

56:19

at sell and pack prices of lithium ion

56:22

batteries and they're seeing those come

56:23

down. So, there's inventory issues.

56:26

there's inventory issues of sales

56:28

between uh cell manufacturers and

56:30

Chinese EV uh producers for example. So

56:34

the sales themselves th those prices are

56:37

down but this is the leading indicator

56:40

and I believe I I mean I don't know for

56:42

certain but I believe this is being

56:44

centrally controlled. My fear is this is

56:47

rare number two in the making. It's

56:50

something that they have in the

56:51

background

56:52

>> that they can control. Now, there's been

56:54

a need for them to control it because

56:57

sell and pack production and inventory

57:00

is through the roof right now. So, two

57:02

different things. This is the earlier

57:04

stage. The sell pricing you're going to

57:06

see is lower. What I'm interested in is

57:10

why is Tesla only doing seven seven

57:13

gawatt hours of LFP production in the US

57:18

and where I mean where are they going to

57:20

get the rest of you know 70 80 gawatt

57:23

hours of LFP? I mean, the the tariffs on

57:28

lithium ion in in cells have have gone

57:31

up in on January 1st again and I think

57:35

they're right around 82%.

57:37

>> Um, so again, when you layer on the AIPA

57:41

tariffs, the section 301 tariffs, the

57:44

fentanyl tariffs, there was an existing

57:46

3.4% one just for lithium ion alone. So

57:50

anyway, I just am interested to see like

57:52

what's the plan for energy? Where are

57:54

you getting cells from and how's this

57:57

going to play out? Again, doesn't seem

57:58

to come up as an issue, but it

58:00

>> Yeah,

58:01

>> it should be. But one thing I do, maybe

58:03

you could stress on Jeff as well is what

58:05

got me by that chart is the prices of

58:08

lithium hydroxide have gone up 120%.

58:10

>> Yep.

58:11

>> In six months.

58:13

>> Yeah,

58:13

>> that's a lot.

58:15

>> They're just shutting down M they're

58:16

just shutting down um refining. They're

58:19

basically just saying, "Look, there's

58:20

too much product out there." This is

58:22

again, they went in six months before

58:24

and said, "Hey, too much too much EV

58:27

production, too many price wars, and

58:29

they went in and intervene there."

58:31

They're still seeing fallout from there

58:33

from that. Again, if you look at the

58:35

cell pricing of lithiumion, you're going

58:37

to see that actually coming uh way down.

58:40

So, there's two different things

58:42

happening. Uh but again, they're just

58:44

time phase. Soon as those cells are are

58:46

soaked up out of inventory, you're going

58:48

to be running into the curve you just

58:49

showed, which is much higher pricing for

58:52

refined material.

58:55

Can we take a look at this, Jeeoff? Uh,

58:57

take a look at this table here because

59:00

um, you can see that it says CyberCap's

59:02

still tooling, the Tesla Semi still

59:04

tooling. Shocking that Roadster still

59:08

says TBD and design development when

59:10

it's supposed to be presented in April

59:12

1st. You got Optimus in construction and

59:14

Mega Packac in construction. But if you

59:16

look over here, it says um Tesla Semi

59:19

and Cybercap both commencing first half

59:22

of 26 and production of the next gen

59:24

Roadster.

59:26

>> Yeah.

59:26

>> What tooling what tooling means is they

59:29

are making the that the design is

59:32

essentially done for production. Not

59:34

saying they're never going to make

59:35

changes. This is the repeat tooling off

59:39

of the first set of tooling so that you

59:41

can scale the product. So when a product

59:43

moves to tooling in the production

59:44

phase, it's moving towards replication

59:47

of tools, those additional tools will

59:50

make more supply to get product into the

59:53

factory from suppliers. And Tesla's own

59:56

factory tooling is being replicated. Now

59:59

I I believe they have the cyber cab

60:02

design done minus again what they find

60:05

in road testing or a reliability test

60:08

here or there. smaller uh you know

60:11

couple day changes, maybe few week

60:13

changes, but they're in they're on the

60:15

green and they're just making shorter

60:17

putts. That's what's happening with that

60:19

and the semi.

60:22

The Roadster, they they haven't I mean,

60:24

nobody's want to hear about the Roadster

60:26

too much, but other than to say that

60:28

they probably haven't approved the final

60:30

design to go into a tooling ramp is is

60:33

what that says.

60:36

>> And it won't be a scale car anyway. So

60:39

that ramp isn't that important. So they

60:42

could probably make it at the uh space

60:44

factory

60:47

down there. Good. Nothing but goodness.

60:50

Anyway, my point about the lithium

60:51

hydroxide, by the way, was foresight.

60:53

That in case anybody missed that is how

60:56

he can anticipate down the line, years

60:59

ahead of time, there's a massive need

61:01

for this and nobody else is going to do

61:02

it. So I thought that was important.

61:05

>> Yeah, for sure. Alexandra before you go

61:07

there take a look at this. If cash says

61:09

we'll manage the business such that we

61:11

ensure a strong balance sheet

61:12

maintaining a sufficient liquidity to

61:14

fund our product roadmap long-term

61:16

capacity expansion plans further

61:18

vertical integration other expenses. How

61:20

are they going to do that and profit

61:23

when this year they're going to be

61:25

launching like we just said MegaC, Mega

61:27

Block, Semi, Optimus, Robo Taxi, Cyber

61:30

Cabs, uh just the list keeps going on

61:33

and on and on. uh AI chips and all that.

61:36

How are they going to fund this?

61:38

>> Well, we've got 44 billion in the

61:40

coffer. So, it's not as if we have no

61:42

money. They they will and and this is

61:44

continuing. This is an acceleration of

61:46

cash of cash producing machine. So, I'm

61:49

I'm not worried about how to fund it.

61:52

I'm just worried how they're going to

61:54

balance it every quarter so that there

61:56

is still some free cash flow because I

61:58

think that is important for um for the

62:02

whole evolution of financials. But even

62:04

if it would not be, we will explain it

62:06

why why it won't be. I just feel like at

62:08

the moment they're doing an extremely

62:10

good job and and Larry explained it

62:12

perfectly well. I think they needed more

62:15

capex in the last couple of weeks of uh

62:19

2025 than anticipated which allowed the

62:22

free cash flow to be actually higher

62:24

than we all thought. I think what they

62:25

are aiming for is just a landing around

62:29

zero which is perfectly fine if you

62:31

explain it with capital expenditure.

62:33

It's not it's it's actually great,

62:34

right? But it's um how well they manage

62:38

it and couldn't have been managed.

62:40

>> I just want to put something in

62:41

perspective.

62:42

>> I just read that Meta plan $135 billion

62:46

of capex in 2026

62:48

versus what Tesla's spending.

62:51

That is wild. I mean I mean how much how

62:53

much is XI Larry? How much is XI spent

62:56

to date to get where they are?

62:58

>> Well, it's about 80 billion to date,

63:00

right? Yeah. And and and and meta is

63:02

nowhere near. We're

63:03

>> ex

63:07

careful though.

63:08

>> Okay. We're hurting Nick.

63:09

>> Yeah. Yeah. You got your calls. I mean,

63:11

>> no.

63:13

>> I would argue no one's making more money

63:16

in AI than Meta right now.

63:19

>> Google is No, Meta.

63:24

I I would wager against that, but we

63:26

>> Who would ever use Well, I think they're

63:29

using it, aren't they?

63:30

>> Advertisers

63:31

>> customer advertising method. Yeah.

63:33

>> Meta's crushing Google right now when it

63:36

comes to

63:36

>> All right. All right. Right.

63:38

>> Anyway, guys, I want to go I want to

63:39

tell you one thing.

63:41

So, we hit a all-time record with energy

63:46

deliveries up 15% on last quarter, which

63:49

was a record. This is a record quarter

63:51

but energy revenue is up 20%. This is

63:55

huge news because energy margins are

63:57

continuing to increase rather than

64:01

reduce which

64:02

>> over 30% now

64:04

>> over no I'm saying the the total margin

64:08

is up by 20%.

64:11

>> Okay. So I mean it's it's really good

64:13

news on the energy front and I was

64:15

really worried about the energy margins

64:18

but it's really good news.

64:19

>> Just to add to that Larry you know in

64:22

this first wave of all this AI

64:25

infrastructure start off with Nvidia

64:27

right and you know some of the other

64:28

ancillary chip companies also benefited

64:30

maybe even some of the servers like the

64:32

super micro Dell HP etc because Nvidia

64:35

chips have to be go somewhere. Um, but

64:38

now as we get into this next

64:41

layer, right, that's where you're seeing

64:42

like Micron, right? The memory chip

64:44

companies that don't have enough supply

64:47

to fill the demand. It's it's insane.

64:50

And energy energy is that other part of

64:53

it, too. So, this can just continue,

64:56

right? It always starts off with the

64:58

hardware and it slowly gets out before

64:59

we even get to the software layer. So,

65:02

it's it's it can get it's going to get

65:04

nutty. I think

65:05

>> it is. and they're talking about

65:07

expanding by 50% their production next

65:10

year. So, I mean, energy is really

65:13

plugging along pretty darn well. I I

65:15

expect we going to hear news of another

65:18

factory

65:19

uh in Europe coming, you know, a build

65:22

out of

65:22

>> energy factory.

65:24

>> Yeah, a build out of

65:25

>> I think we should speculate. I think we

65:27

should speculate in which country.

65:29

>> It's going to be in Berlin. It's going

65:30

to be in Berlin.

65:31

>> Oh, you think they will expand? They

65:33

will expand.

65:35

>> Oh, yeah. Absolutely. So, absolutely.

65:37

>> They're done with Germany.

65:38

>> No, they're not.

65:40

>> Well, I think it's gonna be Italy. I

65:42

think it's going to be I was going to

65:44

say Italy, too.

65:45

>> It's going to be Germany. It's going to

65:47

be Germany. They're going to they're

65:48

already building it. And and it's going

65:50

to be in Germany. They've got they've

65:52

got the space, they've got the

65:53

production, they've got the people,

65:55

they've got everything.

65:55

>> I mean, I can tell you greenhide

65:57

politics. I think we've had enough.

66:00

>> It doesn't matter anymore.

66:02

>> Yeah. Poland would be great. No, it's

66:04

going to happen in Germany.

66:06

>> Poland, you got brilliant people.

66:08

>> Politics align or be more less

66:12

regulatory as close to Berlin.

66:14

>> It could be Hungary as well.

66:16

>> 100% aligned with you, but the the

66:18

capital investment would be staggering

66:21

compared to the marginal capital

66:23

investment in Germany. And they're

66:26

already making fairly solid profits in

66:28

Germany. They're very, very happy with

66:29

their German. I mean, Germany is

66:31

supplying all of Europe and except for

66:35

certain models, but but they're very

66:38

happy with the German margins and

66:40

they're very happy with German

66:41

production. So, don't underestimate it.

66:44

You're listening to the news, but you're

66:46

not seeing the the real picture.

66:49

>> Okay.

66:51

>> Hey, one more thing.

66:53

>> News I I listen to, by the way.

66:55

>> Uh Jeff, let's bring you back in. Take a

66:57

look at this product. Is this the first

66:59

time we've seen this sentence?

67:02

Future monetization opportunities via

67:04

services powered by AR AI software.

67:13

>> Yeah, this is just saying that the the

67:15

model is changing

67:18

uh and the mo the sources of revenue and

67:20

the sources of margin are changing. This

67:22

is what this is saying. And there's

67:24

going to be more of a transition to this

67:27

and less of a focus on, you know, us

67:30

waiting, you know, and and nervously by

67:34

the production numbers every single

67:36

quarter. There's going to be it's going

67:37

to be more of the sources of revenue and

67:40

gross margin going to come from FSD,

67:43

supervised, unsupervised, and robo

67:45

taxiing.

67:46

By the way, there's another comment in

67:48

the deck about there being, and we've

67:51

talked about this a lot on the show, a

67:53

transition in their go to market model

67:56

of of fleet of having units available

67:59

for traditional sales and for for fleet

68:02

operations. This is Tesla telling you

68:06

that their business model to sell cars

68:09

is changing and it's not just going to

68:11

be build to order, go to the website,

68:14

order a car. that'll still be available.

68:17

There'll be cars in inventory you can

68:19

still buy, but now there's going to be

68:20

this, hey, we're going to be we're going

68:22

to be building vehicles and pushing them

68:23

into our fleet.

68:40

>> Yeah, eerily quiet.

68:43

I'm reading the deck again.

68:46

>> Well, I got an observation that's I

68:48

think kind of interesting.

68:50

>> Um, Herbert, could you uh zoom in on

68:53

Larry? Larry, have you been consulting

68:55

with uh Mark Zuckerberg stylist? You

68:58

look fly right now. You look good. Oh,

69:01

can black shirt.

69:06

What are you doing? You're married

69:07

little kid.

69:08

>> Larry smiling for the very first time. I

69:11

do shows with them twice a year week and

69:13

a smile.

69:14

>> I'm preparing for my uh 80th birthday.

69:18

>> Let's go.

69:19

>> You're doing well. And so this is the

69:20

new office lamp or what what is this

69:22

whole thing in the background? Tell us a

69:24

little bit about this.

69:25

>> Well, I bought JetBlue Airways. So this

69:27

is my office.

69:29

>> So this is your new office and this is a

69:31

real lamp or what is it on on top of

69:34

your I mean crown? It's it's my crown.

69:37

>> It's your crown. Okay.

69:38

>> Is it an airline?

69:41

It's it's the JetBlue lounge. And you

69:44

know,

69:45

>> I've just been on a 7-hour flight from

69:47

London and I've got a five a fivehour

69:51

layover and flight.

69:53

>> Look at those comments. My gosh.

69:56

>> Yeah.

69:59

>> You're welcome, guys.

70:02

>> Thanks, Nick.

70:06

>> Everybody loves you. Damn, Lord.

70:09

>> I love everybody. I I I met up with a

70:12

whole bunch of followers in in London.

70:14

That was that was so fun. There,

70:17

>> you know, the guys in in the UK are so

70:20

hungry for FSD. You've no idea. I mean,

70:23

they're jonesing like crazy. And they're

70:26

really keep I mean, they know as much as

70:28

we do. They're they're right up there,

70:31

you know. It's amazing.

70:32

>> Did you see that Sweden allowed today?

70:35

The FS testing.

70:36

Yeah,

70:37

>> it is coming. It's

70:38

>> not Stockholm, but right next to

70:40

Stockholm,

70:41

>> right? And then the the other thing I

70:43

just want to point out while we have a

70:44

big audience today is my pinned post

70:47

allows you to automatically send emails

70:50

very easy. We really prepared it as easy

70:52

as possible to all the different

70:53

European regulators in all the different

70:55

countries and we're actually adding some

70:56

more as they come along. So those are

70:59

the right addresses, email addresses.

71:00

All it takes is for you to either use

71:04

the information and do it yourself or

71:06

use that little tool that Jeffrey um not

71:08

our Jeffrey here in in California

71:11

developed where you can automate it all

71:12

and just put in your name and which

71:14

which agency you want to write in and

71:16

off it goes. So please use that because

71:20

the pressure is building up. Elon said a

71:22

couple of days ago Europe is usually on

71:26

you know a decision making process in

71:28

about a month. So they we need to to

71:32

help as much as we can, please.

71:33

>> This one here, right?

71:35

>> Exactly. The pinned one. That's exactly

71:37

it. And that the whole instructions is

71:38

there. It really shouldn't take you more

71:41

than two to three minutes if you use the

71:42

full set. And if you want to do it

71:43

yourself, it takes you maybe five

71:45

minutes. But and and no information goes

71:47

back to us. It's just for you to be able

71:49

to do it in a very easy manner. Okay.

71:52

That is for my European friends, please.

71:57

>> Got a quick Yeah, great job. I've got a

71:58

quick story actually regarding European

71:59

friends which is interesting and some

72:01

data around robo taxi and safety and

72:03

regulations if you want to kill some

72:05

dead air. Herbert.

72:09

>> Uh,

72:10

>> it

72:12

do it.

72:13

>> Is that it? Oh, no.

72:14

>> No, no. Slide three to begin. Uh, first

72:17

of all, I just want to touch on this

72:18

real briefly. You you may have shared it

72:20

before, but I think it's a very

72:22

interesting pattern here developing.

72:23

First of all, you got quarter over

72:25

quarter or whatever chasing Uber prices.

72:29

You got Uber prices chasing Whimo

72:31

prices. And Whimo has stopped their

72:34

growth. So now they're beginning to cut

72:35

prices ever so slightly. And of course

72:37

Tesla is less than half or less than all

72:40

of them combined. That's the first

72:42

little story. Second piece, speaking of

72:44

Europeans, Alexandra, Europeans are

72:47

stacking record volume of US st stocks.

72:50

A lot of them are MAG 7. We don't know

72:51

exactly places like Denmark, um, France,

72:56

Finland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden,

72:58

UK. They are all buying a lot of US

73:00

stocks. They've given up on investing in

73:01

local stocks. of those interesting

73:03

lobbying update very important for if

73:05

anybody's input on this a lot of people

73:07

are asking why doesn't Tesla lobby the

73:09

biggest lobbyer here is again Meta then

73:11

Amazon then Google then Microsoft maybe

73:14

is that because Elon has an inside seat

73:16

at the table and doesn't need to and

73:18

then one other thing is current safety

73:21

streak for Tesla miles no incident is at

73:24

389,160

73:27

the average crash that's covered by

73:29

police and insurance for a driver is

73:31

every 300 100,000 mi, which is

73:33

approximately every 30 years for a

73:35

human. And now, so far, the current

73:37

streak has beaten the human safety level

73:40

for robo taxi alone. But remember, if

73:43

they do so much as get a little praying

73:45

against a fire hydrant, that's reported.

73:49

Whereas the human reports and human

73:51

insurance claims tend to be very severe.

73:53

A lot of people drive into ditches,

73:55

crash into walls and parking lots, and

73:56

never file a claim. So, you never even

73:58

hear about it. And fin Well, that was

74:00

it. Uh, one other thing. I have one

74:02

other thing. Uh, slide five. Did I cover

74:04

it already? Oh, hold on a second.

74:08

This one. Um, uh, AI, this DOT law, the

74:13

Department of Transportation. Uh, this

74:15

might be because the influence Elon has

74:17

with the government. They're now trying

74:19

to streamline the regulations from a

74:21

federal perspective for the Department

74:22

of Transportation, which could be a big

74:24

tailwind for Tesla and FSD. Thoughts?

74:29

announcing

74:33

>> a lot of stuff there.

74:34

>> Yeah, this this is the big one. I mean,

74:37

uh the conversation still keeps popping

74:40

up if the laws aren't approved in time

74:44

because it looks like that Tesla's cyber

74:46

cow production is on its way this year

74:49

and you saw the numbers that they're

74:50

talking about. This needs to catch up. I

74:53

mean, I think 94,000 95,000 is enough

74:56

for the government for one year. Then

74:58

they'll need to increase it by next

74:59

year, but they need to approve that by

75:01

this year.

75:02

>> Yeah. But this covers everything like no

75:04

steering wheel, no pedals, no safety

75:07

monitors, etc. This could be huge. But

75:09

wasn't there a falling out between Tom

75:10

Duffy, the head of DOT and Elon Musk?

75:14

>> Am I correct?

75:16

>> N I mean,

75:17

>> yes, but not really.

75:18

>> In in political, sure, there was a

75:20

fallout between Elon and Trump in June,

75:22

and now they're having dinner together.

75:25

I I think it's it's one of those things

75:28

that they'll figure it out in

75:31

>> Yeah. Once Trump and Elon make friends,

75:34

then all the cabinet members are

75:37

automatically friendly towards Elon. I

75:40

hate to say it, but I think that's just

75:42

the

75:42

>> Yeah,

75:43

>> the way. Any comments on the safety, the

75:45

safety streak? No incident.

75:48

>> This is big. Nobody cares.

75:51

>> Can I ask a question related to this?

75:53

>> Yeah.

75:54

Am I crazy or did someone say they saw

75:56

in the debt because I'm like looking

75:57

everywhere for it that we have over a

76:00

million subscriptions to FSD?

76:02

>> Did someone say that?

76:03

>> That's correct.

76:04

>> What the hell is that?

76:05

>> I can't find this.

76:07

>> 1.1 million.

76:08

>> It's written clearly. It's a bullet.

76:10

>> There's also another bullet which they

76:13

may they may have misspoken because in

76:14

the deck when you do the math it's about

76:16

38% increase year-over-year. But then

76:18

they say monthly subscriptions to FSE

76:20

supervised continue to grow sequentially

76:22

and more than doubled in 2025. So I

76:26

think what they're saying here breaking

76:28

it down in case people are confused,

76:30

there's the monthly subscriptions which

76:32

have doubled. The $8,000 one-time hit

76:36

hasn't.

76:38

And that's maybe why they're also going

76:40

to the monthly subscription. So, for the

76:42

people confused about the 38% increase

76:44

and the 50% increase, that's probably

76:47

where that comes from. Could I be wrong?

76:55

>> Am I talking to myself?

76:57

>> Jeff, you said page six.

76:59

>> Yeah, page six. In the middle of the

77:01

table, it says active FD subscriptions.

77:04

>> It's gone up 10% the last three

77:06

quarters, every quarter, quarter over

77:08

quarter. Oh gosh, I'm freaking blind

77:10

here. Now I see it.

77:13

>> Wow.

77:13

>> That's a That's actually a big move.

77:16

>> Yeah. Did Did they have this last

77:18

quarter? I don't remember.

77:19

>> The first time.

77:20

>> Okay. So, I'm not crazy. I

77:21

>> The whole the whole presentation

77:22

changed. I actually had a message from

77:24

Travis saying, "How do you like the new

77:26

presentation?" So, let's tell him. I

77:28

mean, I love it. I think there's so much

77:29

more information than there was ever

77:31

before.

77:32

>> Couldn't agree more. And to me, this

77:34

plus the expansion of the cities, that's

77:36

the biggest thing in this deck. Yeah, I

77:39

think it's I think it's pretty clear.

77:40

It's built around the comp plan as well,

77:42

so people can track milestones. Could

77:44

that be correct?

77:45

>> Look at look at this, Jeff. Days of

77:47

supply of inventory 15. That is correct.

77:49

>> So low. Jeez.

77:51

>> That's what Jeff was talking about.

77:52

Like, of course, you're going to have

77:53

good quarter good numbers when when you

77:55

see that is what Jeff was saying

77:56

earlier.

77:57

>> Yeah.

77:58

>> Yeah. But it looks like they are

78:00

preparing to ramp a lot of product

78:02

because their their factory inventory is

78:05

up over 20%. quarteron quarter. So

78:10

that's interesting. That's a thing to

78:11

keep an eye on. That's one that's one

78:13

you have to watch multiple quarters in a

78:15

row to see if there's kind of a story or

78:18

not. But anyway, if I were an analyst,

78:20

I' i'd asked about, okay, what's going

78:22

on with inventory? What what's

78:24

happening? But their finished goods

78:26

inventory is in great shape. So it's not

78:27

like you have some issue up and down the

78:29

whole chain. And I think they're

78:30

actually just they're preparing for

78:32

ramp.

78:34

>> I just want to test the sound system.

78:36

This is an old uh earnings call that

78:38

they had. If I play it, can you guys

78:40

hear the sound playing?

78:45

>> Yes, we hear it.

78:47

>> Okay, good. Thank you.

78:49

>> So, we'll be following this closely.

78:52

>> I have to say that this earnings call,

78:54

this earnings report

78:57

is about as good as we could possibly

79:00

have anticipated. I don't think anybody

79:04

could have anticipated

79:06

>> the all of it good. I mean there isn't

79:09

there isn't a single

79:11

>> item here that is not really I mean even

79:14

order G gross margins are quite

79:16

remarkable actually.

79:18

>> You have to listen to CNBS with emphasis

79:21

on the BS. Revenue fell for the third

79:24

time in three quarters and sales fell

79:26

for the full year declined for the first

79:29

time on record. Net income plunged 61%

79:32

from a year ago in the quarter.

79:34

Operating expenses jumped 39. They say

79:36

nothing good. It's just negative.

79:39

>> To give credit though, for the first

79:41

time I was listening when the numbers

79:43

came out right away because Herbert

79:44

couldn't didn't pay his internet bill.

79:46

Um, Phil Labau did come on and he did

79:50

actually say they beat top and he he

79:53

actually had a positive lost for the

79:56

first time. I know. I'm just saying for

79:58

the first time I you know sometimes

80:03

and Kramer was not wrong for the first

80:05

time. So I'm just saying like we got to

80:07

give

80:08

>> but what's very interesting is what they

80:11

do in the broadcast and what they is

80:15

like two completely different things

80:17

because this woman who does the Tesla

80:21

beat is just so I mean she's incredible.

80:24

She's incred Laura Colodney. I bet you

80:27

that was a Laura Coladney piece. She is

80:29

terrible. Terrible. I hope she sues me

80:33

because, you know, I'd love to go to

80:35

court with her. Love to do it.

80:38

>> Discovery.

80:40

Discovery.

80:42

>> Yeah.

80:42

>> So, in about a half an hour, about uh

80:44

2:30, so at about 35 minutes from now,

80:47

they will do the live stream. We'll do

80:48

that. We've confirmed that we have got

80:50

it uh ready to go.

80:53

Okay. Couple of other interesting things

80:55

I think are worth discussing. Well, if

80:57

we finish the safety score, nobody seems

81:00

impressed with that. I I personally was.

81:02

>> It's very impressive. No, it it's very

81:04

impressive. It

81:06

>> I don't find a single thing. There's

81:08

energy. There's like photos. There's

81:12

It's just amazing.

81:14

>> This is like

81:16

how good how good does it get?

81:19

>> Yeah. The other thing uh this very

81:22

interesting options action a lot of

81:24

people I've been watching whoever it is

81:27

there some trader out there and they

81:29

keep on buying uh like the 990 calls for

81:33

the end of the year for December 2026

81:36

and somebody today made a played a

81:38

blinder. Somebody bought about I think

81:40

it was

81:42

12.

81:43

>> Are you showing your screen? Are you

81:44

sharing?

81:45

>> Uh slide number 12. I do have a scrape

81:48

of this is the option action.

81:51

This one uh somebody very cleverly with

81:54

a lot of insight. So this you can always

81:56

get a good feel for how bullish the

81:57

market is by analyzing what people do an

81:59

hour before the earnings call. Somebody

82:01

went in and bought 14,200 of the 460

82:04

calls. 12,000 and these are for January.

82:08

These are in like like two days. as

82:10

somebody bought the 500s

82:13

for the 12,000 contracts, the 432.5s

82:17

100, you know, 14,000 contracts, 430s,

82:20

22,000 contracts. That was a nice money

82:22

maker today. That was very interesting.

82:25

>> But but you can't see the other side of

82:27

it. You can't see the other side.

82:28

>> I look at the puts, too. I look at the

82:29

putts, too. No, the point is somebody's

82:32

actually bought in.

82:33

>> But how do you know someone bought those

82:35

calls and they didn't sell them?

82:37

>> Yeah. Ei either way, the volume is

82:39

extremely high and extremely skewed to

82:41

the bullish side. So people there's no

82:44

there's no way people would sell that

82:46

number of calls before an earnings call

82:49

with the sentiment so low. I think

82:51

people are playing very shortterm calls

82:53

to the upside. So I see this in crypto

82:56

all the time as well and other places,

82:58

but it just seemed very bullish to me

83:01

because the skew was very high out of

83:04

the money. That's the way I normally

83:06

read it and it works pretty well.

83:09

>> I think it it may be a general it may be

83:12

a significant pointer in general terms,

83:16

but it's very hard to tell each you know

83:19

what each trade really means. Very hard

83:23

when there's when there's hours left on

83:25

the clock and people are buying $30 out

83:29

of the money. Uh it's

83:32

>> that's just I don't know. I I think

83:34

that's like just buying a lottery

83:35

ticket. That's

83:36

>> Oh, it is. It's very risky. But maybe

83:39

>> But what I'm saying is it's not like

83:40

it's I I don't see that as signal of

83:42

anything. I just see that someone's just

83:44

taking a shot.

83:45

>> But my point is you don't see you don't

83:48

know if there's another side of that

83:49

trade.

83:49

>> There's always another side. So if

83:51

somebody's buying them, the market maker

83:53

has to fulfill it. If somebody's

83:55

>> trade that's one leg of a trade.

83:58

>> Yes. Exactly.

83:59

>> That of that trader's trade, not

84:02

somebody else's.

84:03

>> Yes. Yeah.

84:03

>> So, yeah. So, for all you know, it's an

84:05

iron condor or a put or a call spread

84:08

and you don't know. So, like really it's

84:09

not as bullish as you think it is.

84:11

>> Right. Right.

84:13

But then you would see over then you

84:15

would see the only one part you see you

84:19

can look at the Nick you can look at the

84:21

overall sentiment right is the overall

84:23

sentiment bullish or or so

84:26

>> exactly

84:26

>> I think yeah James

84:29

>> I think this is a good summary right

84:32

Larry you like to look at this all the

84:33

time here's what happened to revenue it

84:35

decreased 3% year-over-year

84:38

but uh this is why decrease in vehicle

84:40

deliveries which everybody was expecting

84:42

lower regulatory credit revenue, but

84:44

there was a growth in energy, growth in

84:46

services, positive uh FX impact, growth

84:50

in other automotive sales, partly driven

84:54

by an increase in FSE subscriptions.

84:56

That's great. Higher average selling

84:59

price. Whoa, that's unexpected.

85:01

>> And wow,

85:03

>> inclusive of mixed impact. And then

85:05

profitability increase in SPC and

85:07

restructuring increase in operating

85:08

expenses higher average cost per vehicle

85:12

due to lower fixed cost absorption for

85:14

certain models and increase in tariffs.

85:18

H decrease in vehicle deliveries of

85:20

course lower regatory credit revenue but

85:23

then there was higher average gross

85:24

profit. Oh what that's interest growth

85:29

in energy growth in services growth in

85:31

others. So that's a good way to explain

85:34

what happened.

85:34

>> Well, the the FSD has a huge impact on

85:37

the ASP. Also, the refreshed

85:40

>> Juniper, etc. It's a more valuable car,

85:42

and they could do more with the same

85:44

production lines, etc. So, that's all

85:46

very clear, but that goes directly to

85:48

this FSD tailwind, which I think will be

85:51

a huge boost for 2026.

85:55

>> Yeah, you're absolutely right. It hasn't

85:56

begun. I think we're going to see a very

85:58

very significant uh year this year on

86:02

FSD tailwind regardless of all the other

86:06

all the other potential catalysts. I

86:10

think that the growth in FSD revenue is

86:12

going to come as a big shock to a lot of

86:14

people.

86:15

>> Yeah. Q1 FOMO as well. The $8,000 deal

86:18

will be will help Q1, which is actually

86:21

timely because Q1 always sucks. It's

86:24

always a dead quarter. So that's going

86:25

to help. Yeah.

86:26

>> So, they announced there's 1.1 million

86:28

FSE subscriptions today. Elon needs to

86:31

get to

86:32

>> 10 10 million. Yeah.

86:34

>> What's what are your predictions, guys,

86:37

given where how good FSD is now, how

86:39

good it's going to be

86:39

>> before the end of next year?

86:41

>> By the end, but let's say by the end of

86:43

this year,

86:44

>> what do you think the uptake is going to

86:46

be? If it's 1.1 as of Q4,

86:49

>> that's just north that's just North

86:51

America.

86:53

four million

86:54

>> in Korea now too

86:56

>> South Korea has it

86:58

>> and they they're tech forward so they'll

87:00

buy a lot of it

87:03

>> it's not a lot of vehicles

87:04

>> it's mainly North America then yeah

87:06

right South Korea and in Australia so if

87:08

there's a big EU approval as Larry was

87:12

talking about you'll see a big flood

87:13

come in there's a big China approval

87:16

you'll see them come in but I like that

87:18

I like that this this 10% growth

87:20

quarteron quarter that we're just seeing

87:24

uh with a very low approval uh in terms

87:26

of number of countries. That's a that's

87:29

a promising sign. The other thing I

87:31

don't I I've always talked about FSD

87:33

tracker and how I don't like it. Uh but

87:36

one thing it is good for is looking at

87:38

relative data now that you build a suite

87:40

up over FSD version 12, 13, and 14 if

87:43

they're measuring things relatively

87:45

consistently. And what it shows is

87:47

basically going from 13 to 14 FSD 13 to

87:50

14. There's almost a 10x improvement in

87:54

the rate of disengagements both critical

87:56

and non-critical.

87:58

That's I mean this is something that all

88:01

the bears go to. This is something that

88:03

a lot of the analysts site in their

88:05

reports and FSD14 is showing an 8 to 10x

88:09

improvement in that. I think that's

88:12

that's also an interesting data point.

88:13

That's the one thing you can probably

88:15

actually use it for.

88:20

>> Thanks, Jeeoff.

88:21

>> Okay, so given um the report that we saw

88:25

dropped, what are were predictions of

88:27

what they might say about robo taxi?

88:30

They listed out the about nine states or

88:33

nine cities uh that they listed out or

88:36

they're going to roll out or are they

88:37

going to say anything more other than

88:38

what they've shared here?

88:41

If I'm an analyst on the call, I'm going

88:43

to ask you said you you said 8 to 10

88:45

cities by the end of 2025

88:47

and now you're saying by mid 2026, what

88:51

ch it's okay. I mean, I get what if I

88:54

what changed and what gives you greater

88:55

confidence now that you're going to hit

88:57

this June milestone? I hope somehow that

89:00

comes up or hope they just relate like

89:01

this is why we think we're hitting this.

89:03

This is this is this is why this is why

89:05

we're competent.

89:08

>> I like that.

89:12

Yeah, I mean I

89:13

>> in the last quarter in the last quarter

89:17

FSD miles tripled

89:21

tripled. So if you multiply FSD miles,

89:26

not sorry, robo taxi miles, robo taxi

89:28

miles tripled. If you triple every

89:31

quarter, what do you get to at the end

89:32

of this year?

89:36

I mean,

89:38

tripling a quarter is a hell of a

89:40

multiple. A hell of a multiple.

89:44

I mean, Herbert, to answer your question

89:47

though, I hope I hope they address like

89:50

the the ramp like even if it's just in

89:53

Austin, like okay, the other cities like

89:56

Jeff, I I I love the question because

89:58

that's my curiosity as well. But okay,

90:01

well, you're in Austin. What's the rate

90:04

of scaling there? Like what's going on

90:06

there? You know, you have now some robo

90:10

taxis without supervision. Does that

90:12

mean you're good or is that just still

90:14

testing? You know, is this where you

90:16

start to slowly add more of those or is

90:18

this still just testing out the safety

90:20

and making sure that everything's good?

90:22

Like how should we think about that?

90:30

>> Yeah,

90:32

agreed.

90:34

I I think there needs to be some sort of

90:36

near-term tangible milestones

90:40

with robo taxi. I I think if you're

90:42

coming from the tech world and you

90:45

understand that Tesla's doing something

90:46

that's never been done before with

90:49

vision, with AI, they're doing a real

90:51

scale play on on physical real world AI.

90:55

I've always thought there'd be a 30 to

90:56

60 day window around some of these

90:59

promises and milestones and I so I get

91:01

it. But the 99.99%

91:04

of the people that invest or follow the

91:06

company won't and the media certainly

91:08

won't. So just explaining what's

91:10

different. Uh and what what are they

91:12

seeing? I mean I I I think it's

91:15

something interesting this this

91:16

driverless robo taxi in Austin that is

91:20

probably on a release that we have none

91:23

of us have ever experienced. And what

91:26

gave them that kind of confidence to do

91:28

that? And when would we see that?

91:32

>> Jeeoff, I think you I think they're

91:35

they're putting onto this report the

91:37

mile the

91:40

the measure that they're going to give

91:42

us and these miles driven if aerobaxi

91:45

miles driven. I think once they've used

91:48

a graph, they generally stick to that

91:50

format. So I think it's miles driven on

91:53

a quarterly basis. We're going to see

91:55

and that's

91:58

I think that's the measure they're going

91:59

to use

92:02

tax.

92:03

>> See a goal line if I you know if you're

92:04

running an operation and and somebody

92:06

gets comes to you in a meeting and

92:07

presents a chart without a goal line.

92:10

>> So I I'm I'm agreeing with you but I

92:13

think the goal line is going to be miles

92:15

driven. I think the goal line is going

92:17

to align with this chart.

92:19

>> They should put it on the chart. Yeah.

92:22

>> Well, I think they'll first speak to it

92:24

at the meeting. I'm hoping they speak to

92:27

this at the meeting and then that's

92:29

that's the measure we we use going

92:31

forward. Generally, at the meeting, they

92:34

give you how we should think about the

92:36

future.

92:40

Oh, he's frozen.

92:45

Yeah, I get it. I think it's hard. It's

92:47

difficult. I agree with you, Larry.

92:48

Ladies and gent

92:53

sit around day and how many miles driven

92:54

is the entire world driving every day. I

92:57

think the way people think is number of

92:59

cities, number of vehicles and they're

93:02

just trying to understand more of these

93:04

tangible milestones. And again, this

93:07

this chart could shift

93:08

>> for the next three meetings in a row if

93:11

they don't lock in it with a goal line.

93:13

If you look at Arc Invest's analysis and

93:16

you look at some of the and new streets

93:18

analysis, it all it all uh hinges on

93:24

miles driven and total miles. I I don't

93:27

think it's number of cities and I don't

93:30

think it's, you know, number of I I just

93:33

think it's miles driven. I think that's

93:35

the

93:37

>> that's the metric that we're going to be

93:39

using going forward.

93:40

>> Yeah.

93:48

Hi sir.

93:51

>> Hey Larry. Did I miss something?

93:55

>> Yeah, you missed all the important

93:58

stuff.

93:59

>> I heard you guys. You guys covered it

94:00

nicely.

94:01

>> CERN was in the lab making charts. Got a

94:04

few charts for you.

94:05

>> How do you feel about the XAI news?

94:08

>> Um, it's a good it's good. It's, you

94:11

know, it's small. Does it move the

94:13

needle? I don't know. But

94:14

>> well, technically two billion with

94:16

approximately 230 billion valuation is

94:18

1% of XAI. Yeah.

94:20

>> Which is which is kind of substantial.

94:21

>> Sure.

94:22

>> Yeah.

94:23

>> It's not so much a needle mover for a

94:25

1.5 trillion company, but but I get it.

94:27

It's that's good.

94:28

>> But but it's a direction. It's it's a

94:31

start. Yeah.

94:35

>> I'm uh I'm trying to get your slides out

94:37

ready.

94:42

You were on the hamster wheel crunching

94:44

numbers.

94:45

>> I was.

94:46

>> What do you think the gross margin? That

94:48

was impressive.

94:49

>> Yeah, I've got some charts to cover

94:50

that. That was uh surprising to me that

94:52

it was so strong.

94:54

>> Yeah, but FSD is pure margin and mega

94:57

pack is high margin

95:00

and a lot of cars sold with the higher

95:02

ASP probably from bundling FSD has

95:05

probably driven a lot of that. would you

95:07

say

95:08

>> ASPs went up and uh the cost to make a

95:11

vehicle went down quite quite

95:13

considerably all things considered. So

95:16

if you look at the the revenues this

95:18

quarter uh if you just look at the red

95:21

which is autos I believe it's the 11th

95:24

highest quarter for the auto business.

95:28

So nothing to write home about right if

95:30

you were an auto analyst you look at

95:31

that and say okay we've had no growth

95:32

for years. If you look at the total

95:35

revenues of the company, right, all of

95:37

the bars, all of the colors, which is

95:40

energy, services, and other, plus the

95:41

red credits in blue, it's the sixth

95:44

highest quarter ever.

95:47

Okay. And then Herbert, if we flip to

95:49

the next line, next page, um, gross

95:52

profit.

95:52

>> Oo, wow.

95:53

>> It's the fourth highest gross profit in

95:57

company in company history. Maybe maybe

95:58

tied for fourth. It's close to to Q3 of

96:02

2022. Can't quite tell which one's

96:03

higher, but it's in that range, fourth

96:05

or fifth,

96:08

right? So, certainly the other

96:10

businesses are picking up some slack.

96:13

Uh, energy, of course, we know that

96:14

story. The services and other uh

96:16

businesses also uh in Q3 showed some

96:20

strong life in Q4 continues to be

96:22

strong. So, it seems to have turned the

96:24

corner uh there on terms of

96:26

profitability.

96:28

And then if we look at uh margins

96:33

uh gross profit margin for the company

96:35

overall 20.2

96:38

um net margin

96:40

>> yeah that's the highest since 2022

96:41

correct?

96:42

>> Yeah that's that's nice right and net

96:45

margin uh 7 and operating margin 5.6.

96:50

Okay. And then if we look at uh auto

96:53

gross margins, if I'm a Wall Street auto

96:56

analyst, I'm actually feeling encouraged

96:58

today for the first time in a long time.

97:01

Um auto gross margins uh with reg

97:04

credits 21% without 18.6,

97:07

which again is the highest in what, two

97:10

years, two plus years

97:12

>> since co 2022. Yeah.

97:15

>> Right. I thought credits were going

97:17

away.

97:19

>> Yeah.

97:21

And then if we look at the business line

97:22

gross margins on the next page,

97:25

energy continues to be high. It's it's

97:27

dipped down a little bit, but Q4 last

97:29

year was a a dip down from Q3. And so

97:33

I'm not surprised to see Q4 dip down

97:35

this year and then probably a strong

97:37

recovery in Q1 as far as margins go for

97:39

energy.

97:40

>> Yeah, I had a theory on that, sir. And I

97:42

talked to Larry about that before. They

97:45

sold a lot of mega packs to XAI. Could

97:47

there have been some type of creative

97:48

transfer pricing with the sister company

97:51

to pressure down margins?

97:53

>> Although I think we saw this margin

97:54

decline, you know, in Q4 last year or

97:57

the prior year in 2024.

98:00

>> So there seems to be some, you know, Q4

98:03

something going on in Q4 that drives

98:04

that down a bit.

98:05

>> At some point tariffs have to come into

98:08

play here. There's really no more mixed

98:10

inventory of cells. The tariffs went up

98:13

on January 1. Uh so I mean the these

98:17

tariffs I think are 82% now on lithium

98:20

LFP cells and even if this you know this

98:22

LFP factories in a ramp in the US in

98:25

Nevada 7 gawatt hours I thought it'd be

98:27

10 by the way but has seven on there

98:29

those are going to be very high price

98:31

cells for the first year and it's going

98:33

to take them a year to get that factory

98:35

to scale. So I mean one interesting

98:37

question is what you know with tariffs

98:40

with you ramping up a brand new LP

98:42

factory and really only a fraction of

98:44

your capacity

98:47

how do you see the the impact of are you

98:49

going to raise prices on mega packs or

98:50

you just going to eat it in gross

98:52

margins

98:54

or have you become massively more

98:56

efficient year on year you found a way

98:58

to to swallow that?

99:00

>> Yeah.

99:02

Uh the blue line there is the uh auto

99:04

gross profit without red credits 18.6

99:07

and then uh services and other 8.8

99:11

down a little bit from Q3 but still very

99:13

strong relative to where it's been over

99:15

its its history.

99:18

And the next chart is for Jeff average

99:21

selling price versus the cost to make.

99:24

So significant decline in the cost to

99:26

make a Tesla down to 34,000 and change

99:30

and the ASP just over 41,000.

99:33

>> That's the lowest cost it's ever hit in

99:36

terms of the vehicle cost.

99:37

>> That's right.

99:39

>> It's amazing.

99:41

>> And then the difference between those

99:42

two is the uh the profitability of a

99:45

Tesla, the gross profit on the next page

99:47

uh widened to just over $7,000 per

99:50

vehicle.

99:53

So that's a nice uh multi-quarter

99:55

improvement. Now

99:56

>> is that is that FSD do you think

99:58

subscriptions?

100:00

>> Um it

100:01

>> or is that a separated or is that

100:02

separated from this profitability per

100:04

vehicle?

100:05

>> Well, I'm assuming it's part of these

100:06

numbers. I'm assuming FSD is part of

100:08

autos not service and other.

100:11

>> Do you think they'll break FSD out now

100:14

in terms of revenue start accounting for

100:17

it separately?

100:19

Yeah, it's a good question, Larry. Um,

100:22

certainly at some point robo taxi robo

100:24

taxi will be broke broken out. I'm not

100:27

sure.

100:29

>> Absolutely. Maybe FSD and robo taxi in a

100:32

separate line item.

100:36

>> And then finally, a brand new chart and

100:38

you guys have been talking about this is

100:40

active FSD subscriptions, which by the

100:42

way includes purchased FSD.

100:44

>> Yes.

100:46

Um but for the first time we've got some

100:49

data going back to Q4 of 2021.

100:53

>> Yeah. Well over a billion.

100:56

>> Yeah. And then we're over uh we're at

100:57

1.1 million subscriptions now.

101:00

>> I think it's the first time we're over a

101:02

million. Is that right?

101:04

>> Uh according to this they were at a

101:05

million in Q3.

101:07

>> Oh at a million. Okay.

101:08

>> Yeah.

101:11

I mean, yes, it looks great, but it's

101:13

also just 200,000 subscriptions in a

101:16

matter of one year from Q1 of 2025 to

101:19

Q4.

101:21

>> 300,000.

101:21

>> We we need to 300,000. We need to see

101:24

that go to millions. And that's what's

101:26

going to happen, I think, next year.

101:28

>> To look at it as a percentage of the

101:31

base. But yeah, I I would agree this is

101:34

what discoverability and all that all

101:37

that plays into. But you 300k on a base

101:40

of 800k

101:42

is huge growth.

101:42

>> Wait, why is it a base of 800k? Is this

101:45

just the US? Because you're again just

101:46

US and South Korea is all you're doing.

101:48

>> Mhm.

101:49

>> Well, you jump from 800k to 1.2 million.

101:53

I mean, in four quarters.

101:55

>> Yeah, but he's saying a base of 800k,

101:57

meaning that's there's only Well, how

101:59

many cars are you saying, Jeff, is

102:01

eligible for

102:01

>> F? The graph. It says Q, it says Q4 2024

102:05

is at there 800k subscriptions and now

102:07

they're at 1.1.

102:09

>> So you're talking what? 40 38 40%

102:12

growth.

102:13

>> Oh

102:15

of of a SAS business. So this is your

102:17

SAS business and it's growing 38 40%. I

102:21

think you're feeling pretty good. I

102:22

would agree with you. Um I would agree

102:24

with you. I but this I think this this

102:26

blows out with country expansion,

102:30

continent expansion and really is Tesla

102:33

going to take you know take the veil off

102:35

of this and actually tell people about

102:37

it

102:39

and by the way so good

102:41

>> the base number Jeff in Q4 of 2024 might

102:44

have been under 800,000 because they're

102:46

just showing one decimal point here

102:49

could have been 755,000 and it rounds up

102:52

to point8

102:53

>> I think I think s another good ratio

102:55

would be the percentage penetration of

102:57

US cars,

102:59

>> which is about just under 4 million if

103:01

I'm not mistaken.

103:03

>> And and that's 25%.

103:05

Growing, maybe even higher.

103:08

>> Yeah, that's a good good point. Um, you

103:11

can bet that I'll make a chart that

103:12

shows that.

103:13

>> Y,

103:15

>> but that's encouraging. If we're already

103:17

at 25% of US vehicles,

103:21

>> a lot of a lot of cars are old. If you

103:23

had an a um AI3 car, hardware 3 car,

103:27

you're probably not going to buy FSD. So

103:30

you could even make it smaller the

103:32

penetration across AI4 cars.

103:35

>> Uh and that's even higher again. So you

103:37

could argue I'd estimate just back of

103:39

the napkin 33% or more of hardware for

103:43

cars have full FSD subscription, but I

103:46

still see a lot of people driving their

103:47

Teslas around physically.

103:49

Mhm.

103:50

>> I Yeah. I I when I look at we we have a

103:54

huge

103:56

um population of Teslas in our area.

103:59

We're high-tech area and I don't see

104:02

people driving with FSD. I see them

104:04

driving their cars. It's it's very I

104:07

it's it's amazing to me.

104:09

>> I did see a guy yesterday. He was going

104:11

around the car and he's looking at my

104:13

Cyber Truck and he's like he's taking a

104:15

right-hander and I'm on the left hand

104:17

side. He's just staring at me and

104:19

staring at the car. So, he was using FSD

104:21

for sure

104:22

>> cuz he going through a zebra crossing or

104:24

whatever you called him here.

104:25

>> Yeah. I just I just went to a four-way

104:27

stop and we both stop like you know

104:29

stopped for a long time and when he

104:31

drove by I saw Yeah. He wasn't holding

104:33

us here. Yeah.

104:35

>> We're both on FS. That's pretty cool.

104:38

>> So, uh a quick uh just sort of setting

104:41

up the stage here. in about uh 10

104:44

minutes, 15 12 minutes from now. We're

104:46

gonna live stream the actual uh Tesla

104:50

earnings call right here. So, we'll do

104:52

that. Stay on and then we'll do post

104:54

analysis. I do want to just say thank

104:57

you to this panel. This is the greatest

105:01

panel that you can put together for

105:03

Tesla experts. You got Larry Goldberg,

105:06

incredible expert. He does deep dives on

105:09

energy, uh almost every single business.

105:11

He's done it. Uh, of course, he's very

105:13

aware of IPOs and stocks and all that.

105:16

Yeah. Nick Gibbs, he's the guy that we

105:18

go to for short-term trading. He has uh

105:21

uh just recently started to teach his

105:23

options course. He can't stop pitching

105:26

it whenever he can, but that's okay. I

105:28

let him I let him do it. You got Jeff

105:30

Lutz, the master. He's a true executive.

105:32

He's led massive global companies

105:35

launching real products, both

105:36

manufacturing, supply chain expertise,

105:38

and quality improvement as well. People

105:40

don't realize he's got that expertise.

105:42

Got Cernin Bashik always comes with this

105:45

financial analysis. I don't know anyone

105:47

else, maybe a couple others who has done

105:49

the deep dive financial analysis,

105:52

including James. He's the one that does

105:54

the deepest dives of financial analysis.

105:56

Um, and uh, of course, he's got his

105:59

channel investing against a grain. Uh,

106:01

no, I'm sorry, Invest Answers. So, first

106:03

of all, thank you guys. Appreciate you

106:05

guys. And so, if you're watching this,

106:06

please like uh, the channels. if you're

106:08

watching it on James or all any of our

106:10

channels and uh you know appreciate that

106:14

that you're doing that.

106:15

>> Yeah, there's one other fun slide that I

106:17

have if CERN's finished with his slides.

106:19

>> Yeah,

106:20

>> this one is slide 10, Herbert, if you if

106:23

you may. It's just why

106:26

it's a personal question for the panel

106:27

here. Why do people continue to fade

106:29

Elon Musk when he has a track record

106:33

that is plain to see? And I even cut off

106:36

what he's achieved in the past with

106:38

SpaceX now 1 and a half trillion IPO

106:40

coming in June, middle of June. Tesla

106:42

1.4 1.5 trillion. 3 trillion combined

106:45

those two little and by the way you

106:46

could argue SpaceX is a side hustle. I

106:48

don't know the true valuation of Boring

106:50

Company or Neurolink but Neurolink is

106:52

soon going to bring sight to people and

106:55

talk about leaving a legacy of forget

106:57

all the other stuff but helping people

106:58

see again is massive. XAI, I don't know

107:01

if it's 300 billion, 230 billion, 500

107:04

billion, but it's going to be worth a

107:05

trillion dollars soon. And then Twitter,

107:08

of course, part of XAI, but I'd like to

107:11

ask, starting with you, Larry, first,

107:13

why do people fade this person? Um, and

107:16

they have no faith.

107:18

>> I think a lot of it has to do with the

107:21

political divide in the country. people

107:24

who are very strongly opposed and there

107:26

are a lot of them and it's pretty you

107:28

know that they're very very very

107:32

uh angry at Elon and they're very angry

107:35

with Elon's side of and I think that

107:38

plays into it in a in a very big way. I

107:42

think it it has probably more to do than

107:45

anything else.

107:47

>> A deep a deeper question man with your

107:49

experience. How can people let their

107:51

biases get in the way of their financial

107:53

decisions? This is what I never

107:55

understood.

107:56

>> It's a strange time we live in. You're

107:58

absolutely correct. It's just a very

108:00

strange time we live in. You know,

108:02

people no longer disagree politely with

108:05

one another about their political views.

108:08

They become angry and then they they

108:10

they

108:12

take the p the persona that they're

108:14

dealing with and they turn that persona

108:17

into some evil, you know, spirit. I it

108:21

is extraordinary. I've never seen this

108:22

in my lifetime. Uh I certainly know that

108:26

it was, you know, it it is how the world

108:29

was in in during the Second World War

108:33

and some and and in Germany before the

108:36

Second World War. But I mean it is

108:38

strange how it there's no longer a

108:41

viewpoint. There's just this

108:44

ver you know verile

108:48

I mean absolute hatred. It's extraord I

108:51

I don't understand it but that's what's

108:53

affecting the view towards Elon. Now

108:57

there are some legitimate you know

109:00

financial

109:03

arguments to be made about potential

109:07

Tesla you know Tesla's

109:10

situation and whether or not you know

109:12

FSD is going to be successful. I mean

109:15

some people really believe it's not

109:17

going to be. We believe very strongly it

109:18

is going to be that it's a legitimate

109:21

perspective. It's possible, but for the

109:23

most part, it's a political it it's just

109:26

a,

109:28

you know, gut hatred. That's all I can

109:31

think of. There's no financial basis for

109:33

it.

109:33

>> No. Cern, how do you square that with

109:36

your clients? Do you even have a client

109:37

that would let their biases get in the

109:39

way of their decisions?

109:41

>> I do. I do. Um, and that happens from

109:45

time to time. And sometimes, uh, people

109:47

change their minds, and I've seen that,

109:48

too.

109:49

>> Yeah. uh for both both ways against Elon

109:52

and now now see him in a different light

109:55

and people that were for Elon and see

109:57

him in a different light. So it's

109:58

interesting I've I've seen it all.

109:59

>> Yeah. I have a friend of mine a funny

110:01

story for the last 5 years I've been

110:03

urging him. He always comes to me what

110:04

should I buy? What should I buy? It's

110:05

like well Tesla $70, Tesla 106, Tesla

110:10

220. He said I don't trust Elon. I don't

110:12

like Elon. Duh. Tesla's all crap. Duh.

110:16

And he comes up to me last week and he

110:18

watched one of my videos. I think it was

110:19

a 2030 game plan. He said, "Okay, I'm

110:21

buying Tesla. What price should I buy

110:23

at?" You know, it's like five years,

110:25

maybe six years of nudging and then he

110:28

turned around. So, people do change and

110:29

that's a very good sign of intelligence

110:31

when people overcome their biases. So,

110:34

it's good to know.

110:35

>> Yeah. Just something to look out for on

110:37

the a lot of the earnings calls coming

110:39

up over the next week tonight and over

110:41

the next week is these hyperscalers

110:43

saying that they could be power

110:46

constrained and and formally introducing

110:49

that concept for the first time. I don't

110:51

know what implications but I know you

110:53

know Elon again continues to be ahead of

110:55

the curve on this and what he's done

110:57

with mega and what he's done with this

110:59

whole concept of just greater

111:02

utilization from load generation. So,

111:04

this could be I mean this is a big

111:06

portion of Tesla's business already and

111:09

the spotlight could could be amplified

111:11

rather significantly.

111:15

>> Yeah.

111:17

Yeah.

111:18

>> Tesla's starting to pop a little more

111:20

right now.

111:21

>> By the way, I did James 450.

111:25

>> Yeah.

111:25

>> Yeah. I did look up

111:27

>> I I did look up the neural link

111:29

valuation just you know looking at your

111:32

slide

111:33

>> and it's a little bit north of 15 it's

111:35

just at 15 billion right now.

111:37

>> Yeah

111:38

>> just I'd mentioned that

111:41

>> and they're going they're going into

111:42

ramping scale as well. I mean that is

111:47

lifechanging for so many people and I

111:49

don't think he gets any credit for that

111:50

as well. Yeah. And I think I think we're

111:53

going to see some very big movement on

111:55

that quite shortly. I wonder why the

111:57

sudden burst of um

112:00

value

112:02

sudden price burst and this late in the

112:06

day. It's interesting.

112:09

Maybe somebody's maybe somebody

112:12

>> Yeah.

112:13

>> casino's open.

112:14

>> Casino's open. Yeah, that's right.

112:17

That's right.

112:20

And I would uh also the the um the price

112:24

that they struck on Xi thought I would

112:27

mentioned to you is 230.

112:30

So that that's the actual valuation.

112:37

>> I hear a little

112:38

>> Yeah, someone's got feedback.

112:40

>> I think it's Larry. Maybe I'm going to

112:42

mute him.

112:43

>> No, that's music I hear from Larry.

112:47

No, I think it can.

112:50

>> Dare you, Larry.

112:53

>> I sound like had a rapper like a can.

112:56

>> Can you guys hear the music?

112:59

>> Yes.

113:00

>> Okay, I'm going to turn down the music

113:02

because uh you'll get uh

113:10

>> Can you guys hear the music still? Yes.

113:12

>> I'll just mute it. Yeah, I just I'll

113:15

keep it very light

113:16

>> just before I get the monetize again.

113:23

>> I just want to make sure that the music

113:24

is going well. I'm going to go and uh

113:27

maximize this. Yeah, looks good. Okay,

113:31

now all I need to do, we're all set.

113:34

Woo.

113:35

>> Hey, how many other car companies have

113:37

quarterly earnings decks that look like

113:38

this?

113:42

Very true, sir. And and this deck, as we

113:44

discussed earlier, it appears to be

113:47

built around the new comp plan, making

113:49

it very easy for us to track.

113:50

>> Y

113:51

>> it's really welld designed. Uh while I

113:54

took my little break to eat my soup, I

113:56

was uh flipping through it again. It

113:58

really answers to a lot of questions we

114:00

had in these previous quarters where we

114:02

didn't have any numbers and here we have

114:04

them. I think that's really nicely

114:06

designed and you're right. It is

114:07

designed to check where we are on the

114:10

comp plan uh milestones. Perfect.

114:14

>> Alexander,

114:15

>> yes.

114:15

>> Can I ask you to at least consider a

114:19

little favor

114:20

>> with your immense influence and

114:22

connections that you have inside Tesla?

114:25

Is there a way Is there a way we can

114:29

have the earnings call be more like how

114:31

Palunteer does it where we can actually

114:33

have a video earnings call?

114:36

>> It seems kind of crazy that we are

114:39

supposedly a huge mag seven company. We

114:42

can't

114:43

>> even Palunteer does it every earnings

114:45

call.

114:46

>> I I mean I don't want to spill the beans

114:49

>> because there's nothing to spill yet.

114:51

Oh,

114:52

>> but there seems to be a real effort to

114:57

help this retail community understand

115:00

Tesla more and more underway. And like I

115:02

said, I don't know anything concrete I

115:05

could share. I would, you know, how what

115:06

a big mouth I am as soon as I know

115:08

you'll all know it. But um but they are

115:11

really working on giving us what we

115:15

want. So I think we should put that on

115:16

list. I have actually no idea how

115:18

palunteer calls are done. Give me a

115:20

quick rundown while we wait.

115:22

>> You just go on YouTube and you watch

115:23

them. That's it.

115:24

>> No, I'm not going to.

115:26

>> We barely can get these guys to use the

115:28

proper mic

115:29

>> exactly

115:30

>> video. But uh we would love it if if we

115:33

the Cyber Bulls could actually ask

115:35

questions. Uh not just the in

115:37

institutional analysts. We should have a

115:39

spot there. And I know they've got the

115:41

list and I know we're going to go

115:42

through that list, but let us get our

115:44

chance to get in front as well. We're

115:46

we're as equal if not stronger than the

115:48

institutional analysts.

115:49

>> That list has been I believe corrupted

115:53

and taken over by others.

115:56

>> I agree and I think we I mean it does

115:59

have a ponderation by number of shares

116:01

you have. So it's not it's not

116:03

completely easy to influence but I think

116:06

there's there must be a better way of of

116:08

doing it. And like I said they're

116:10

working stuff. I have nothing to report

116:12

because I know nothing else but at least

116:14

they're signaling that they want to

116:18

>> collaborate is not the right word but

116:19

work together

116:20

>> so often whenever there's this

116:22

impression that Elon's in a bad mood

116:24

like if you it's I mean it's just like I

116:26

forget what was the famous debate where

116:27

it went from radio to TV was that JFK or

116:30

whatever for the first time and then all

116:32

of a sudden that kind of like swung the

116:34

whole like just seeing someone in their

116:35

mannerisms like so much communication

116:37

comes across through that like if you're

116:39

just like oh he just looks tired But

116:41

he's in a good mood, you know, like

116:43

that's

116:43

>> I agree. I agree. And I mean on the

116:45

other side, he hates talking to

116:47

analysts, right? So I think that, you

116:49

know, the starting position is not a

116:51

favorable one. Now, if we can turn that

116:52

that he's actually talking to his

116:54

beloved retail community. I mean, you

116:56

know how he loves us and how he gives us

116:58

whatever we want, right? I mean, I

117:00

whatever I ask, we we always got it. And

117:03

whatever anybody else asked, they always

117:04

got it. So, I think if we can turn it

117:07

into something more retail oriented,

117:09

that will be great. But I'm going to

117:10

look into the Palunteer earnings score

117:12

so I understand what you're talking

117:13

about. I promise.

117:14

>> Yep. Here. Here.

117:18

>> And then you can collect all the credit

117:20

that you were the inspiration for it if

117:21

you ever get it.

117:22

>> No, I don't I don't care about credit. I

117:23

just I want a better earnings goal. Like

117:25

it's it's 2026. We shouldn't still have

117:27

to just listen. I I can tell you my most

117:31

embarrassing moment in my Tesla life is

117:33

you know that I've been going on for

117:35

couple of quarters now that I can't

117:37

understand the CFO and CFO should learn

117:39

some English and I mean I was out there

117:43

and then in November somebody tapped me

117:45

on the shoulder and said it's me and I

117:48

was like okay

117:50

earth open and swallow me and please and

117:54

and he goes can you understand me? I

117:56

said, "Yeah, yeah, I can. I'm so sorry."

117:59

>> Here we go.

118:01

>> Q&A.

118:02

>> There we go. Let's go.

118:03

>> Good luck, everybody.

118:05

>> Head of investor relations, and I'm

118:06

joined today by Elon Musk, Bev Tanza,

118:09

and a number of other executives. Our Q4

118:12

results were announced at about 3 p.m.

118:14

Central time in the update deck we

118:16

published at the same link as this

118:18

webcast. During this call, we will

118:21

discuss our business outlook and make

118:22

forward-looking statements. These

118:24

comments are based on our predictions

118:26

and expectations as of today. Actual

118:29

events or results could differ

118:30

materially due to a number of risks and

118:32

uncertainties, including those mentioned

118:34

in our most recent filings with the SEC.

118:37

During the question and answer portion

118:39

of today's call, please limit yourself

118:41

to one question and one follow-up.

118:43

Please use the raise hand button to join

118:45

the uh question queue. Before we jump

118:48

into Q&A, Elon has some opening remarks.

118:51

Elon.

118:52

>> Thanks, Travis. So, uh, we've updated

118:55

the Tesla mission to amazing abundance.

118:57

Um, and this is, uh, this is intended to

119:01

send a message of optimism about the

119:03

future. I think we're, um, most likely

119:05

headed to an exciting, uh, amazing era

119:09

of of abundance. uh and uh and I think

119:13

with the with with the advent with the

119:16

with the continued growth of of AI and

119:17

robotics I I think we actually are

119:19

headed to a future of universal high

119:22

income not universal basic income but

119:24

universal high income. Um

119:28

I mean there's going to be a lot of

119:29

change along the way but but that is uh

119:31

that is the that is what I see as the

119:32

most likely outcome. Um

119:35

so so I think that's uh that that it

119:38

makes sense to update Tesla's mission to

119:40

reflect that.

119:41

that goal. Um

119:44

and um and obviously along that way

119:46

we're going to keep improving safety,

119:48

driving down the cost of goods and um

119:51

and getting people access to anything

119:53

they need uh without compromise. Um and

119:56

uh still making sure that the

119:57

environment is great, nature is great,

119:59

and and people can have whatever they

120:01

want, which seems like probably the best

120:03

future. Uh, I'm open to other ideas, but

120:06

that sounds like it sounds like it

120:08

sounds like if you could say what is the

120:10

best future you could possibly imagine,

120:12

I I guess it would be that everyone can

120:13

have whatever they want, including um

120:15

amazing medical care. Um, and and but we

120:19

still keep uh you know, the beauty of

120:21

nature and and uh and earth. I think

120:23

that's probably the best outcome. Um

120:27

and uh and we're seeing obviously the

120:29

first steps along that way um this year

120:32

for Tesla. uh push major steps um as we

120:36

increase vehicle autonomy um and begin

120:39

to produce uh Optimus robots at scale.

120:42

Um we're we're making very very big

120:45

investments. So this is going to be a

120:46

very big capex year uh as Bible will

120:49

will get into um that that is deliberate

120:52

um because we're making big investments

120:54

for an epic future. Um so I think all

120:58

these investments make a lot of sense.

120:59

will continue to make sure that when we

121:02

do spend capital, it is spent very

121:04

efficiently. Um but but it's it's a lot

121:07

of things. Um you know, maj major

121:10

investments in in in batteries and the

121:12

entire supply chain for batteries. U so

121:16

uh we're also going to uh be significant

121:20

manufacturers of of solar cells um and

121:23

um and we're making massive investments

121:25

in AI chips.

121:28

So, uh, but I think these all make a ton

121:31

of ton of strategic sense. And um and

121:35

then I guess I have like one I guess uh

121:40

it's not exactly it's it's not exactly

121:42

bad news, but it's it's a uh

121:47

it's it's we're it's time to basically

121:51

bring the Model S and X programs uh to

121:56

um to an end with an honor honorable

121:58

discharge. um because we're really

122:01

moving into a future that is based on

122:03

autonomy and um and so if if you're

122:07

interested in buying a Model S next, now

122:09

would be the time to order it. Uh

122:11

because we we expect to wind down SNX

122:13

production um next quarter and uh and

122:17

and basically stop production of Model

122:19

SNX next quarter. Um we we'll obviously

122:23

continue to support the Model S and X

122:25

programs uh for as long as people have

122:26

the vehicles. Uh but um but we're we're

122:30

going to take the Model S next

122:31

production space in our Fremont factory

122:34

and convert that into an Optimus factory

122:37

uh which uh will with the with the

122:39

long-term goal of having uh a million

122:42

units a year of of Optimus robots in the

122:46

current SX space in in Fremont. Um, so

122:50

that is uh um it's slightly sad but but

122:55

it's

122:57

but it is it is it is time to bring the

122:59

SX programs to to an end and um shift

123:04

shift really it's it's part of our

123:05

overall shift to an autonomous uh

123:08

future. Um as my profile picture on on X

123:12

said for few months there the future is

123:15

autonomous.

123:18

Um

123:20

and um so let's say with respect to full

123:24

self driving and robo taxi uh people are

123:28

obviously following with very close

123:30

tension the progress of FSD and uh and

123:33

and you can experience it for yourself

123:34

if you've if you've got a Tesla you can

123:36

you notice with really with with every

123:39

um software update the car gets better

123:40

and better at autonomy um and uh and and

123:45

we're you know We we we uh were able to

123:49

do our first uh rides with uh no safety

123:54

monitor in the car in Austin. These were

123:56

paid rides. So these were just sort of

123:58

randomly selected paid rides with uh no

124:02

safety monitor. Um and um and and we um

124:08

I think maybe as of uh maybe yesterday

124:10

or so, we we actually don't we don't

124:12

even have a chase car or anything like

124:13

that. So these are just uh cars with no

124:16

people in them. and no one's following

124:18

the car um in in Austin. So, we we

124:22

obviously are being very cautious about

124:24

this because we want to have we want to

124:26

have no act no injuries or or serious

124:29

accidents along the way. So, I think it

124:31

it makes sense to be very cautious, but

124:34

you'll see the amount of autonomy

124:36

increase dramatically I think every

124:39

every month essentially. So,

124:43

um and and uh and and then there will

124:46

also be an opportunity, something we've

124:48

talked about for a long time, for um

124:50

existing owners of uh of Teslas to add

124:55

or subtract their costs to the fleet. Uh

124:58

kind of like how

125:00

Airbnb works where you can add or

125:02

subtract your house to the the Airbnb

125:05

inventory. Um and um and I think

125:09

probably the value of the the the Tesla

125:12

the sort of partial people adding or

125:15

subtracting their cars to Tesla

125:17

autonomous fleet is probably a little um

125:20

underweighted underwrited by a lot of

125:22

people because we've got millions of

125:23

cars with AI4 that can do this.

125:27

So um so that that that it it might

125:31

potentially I think it will um provide

125:35

an opportunity for a lot of customers to

125:39

um earn more by lending their car to the

125:43

fleet than their lease cost to Tesla.

125:47

Um yeah, which is kind of it's kind of

125:50

like you you get you get you get you get

125:52

in that scenario, you basically get paid

125:54

to own a Tesla. It's quite a good

125:55

scenario. Um

125:59

and uh and and we we expect to have uh

126:02

fully autonomous vehicles in

126:05

um

126:07

you know

126:08

probably I don't know

126:12

somewhere between a quarter and half of

126:14

the United States by the end of the year

126:16

uh pending regulatory approval. Um, you

126:19

know, a big factor would be if if

126:20

there's some kind of federal preeemption

126:22

for autonomous vehicles. Um, in the

126:26

absence of that, you kind of have to go

126:27

on a city by city or state bystate

126:29

basis. Um, but nonetheless, we we even

126:33

if it is city by city, state by state,

126:35

we we expect to be in um, you know, I

126:40

don't know, dozens of cities, dozens of

126:43

major cities by the end of the year.

126:46

Um,

126:48

with respect to energy, the the the

126:50

Tesla energy team has uh done incredible

126:53

work and uh the the growth rate on that

126:56

is continuing to be very strong and and

127:00

we're we're building more manufacturing

127:02

capacity and and expect that uh yeah and

127:06

energy will will have very high growth

127:07

for

127:09

really as far into the future as we can

127:10

imagine.

127:12

uh the the solar the solar opportunity

127:14

is underestimated.

127:16

We think um the the best way to add

127:19

significant capability to the grid is or

127:22

or not to the grid, let's say it's

127:24

powering AI data centers is uh solar and

127:28

batteries on Earth and uh solar in

127:30

space. So that's why we're we're going

127:33

to uh work towards um getting 100

127:36

gawatts a year of of solar cell

127:39

production. um

127:42

uh integrating across the entire supply

127:43

chain from raw materials all the way to

127:46

finished uh solar panels.

127:49

Um

127:51

uh maybe a bit more about Optimus. Um we

127:56

we'll probably unveil Optimus uh three

127:59

in a few months. Um and um I think it's

128:04

it's going to be quite uh

128:07

surprising to people. It's is an

128:09

incredibly capable robot. Um, and as I

128:12

mentioned, we are replacing the SX line

128:15

in Fremont with a million unit million

128:18

unit per year line of Optimus. Um, now

128:23

because it is a

128:26

completely new supply chain,

128:29

it's just it's a there's really nothing

128:33

from from the existing supply chain that

128:35

exists in in in Optimus. Everything is

128:38

designed from physics first principles.

128:43

So that means um the the normal scurve

128:46

of manufacturing ramp will be longer for

128:49

Optimus than it is for uh products that

128:52

have uh at least some portion of an

128:54

existing supply chain. Like when

128:56

everything's new, um the the production

129:00

rate will be proportionate to the least

129:03

lucky, least confident part of the

129:05

entire supply chain. And if there's

129:07

10,000 things that need to go right,

129:09

it's, you know, it only takes one to to

129:11

be slowed to to lag that. But, um, so it

129:15

will be sort of a stretched out S-curve.

129:17

Uh, but I'm I'm confident that we'll get

129:20

to million units a year of, uh, in

129:22

Fremont

129:23

of Optimus 3. Um,

129:28

and and this this Optimus really will be

129:30

a general purpose robot that can um

129:33

learn by observing human human behavior.

129:35

So you can like demonstrate a task or

129:37

literally verb verbally describe a task

129:39

or show it a task um even show it a

129:42

video and it will be able to do that

129:44

task. So it's a it's going to be a very

129:47

capable robot. Um I I think long-term

129:51

optimist will have a very significant

129:55

impact on the US GDP like it will

129:59

actually move the needle on US GDP

130:01

significantly.

130:05

So um in conclusion um

130:10

uh you know there's still obviously many

130:11

who doubt our ambitions for creating

130:13

amazing abundance but we're we're

130:16

confident uh it can be done and that

130:19

we're making the right moves

130:20

technologically to ensure that it does

130:23

and um Tesla's obviously not never been

130:26

a company to shy away from solving some

130:28

of the hottest problems. Um,

130:31

you know, it's uh I think that's kind of

130:33

how you build value in a company is you

130:35

solve hard problems. Um, it's like I

130:37

don't know how you create value by

130:38

solving easy problems. Um, so there's

130:41

there's a lot of hard problems that the

130:43

Tesla team uh is going to solve, but

130:45

it's a incredibly talented, hardworking

130:47

team. Um, and I'd like to thank actually

130:51

everyone at Tesla for their their

130:54

incredible hard work. Um, and it's an

130:56

honor to work with such such a talented

130:58

group. So, thank you to everyone who is

131:00

supporting this mission. The future is

131:02

more exciting than you can imagine.

131:06

>> Fantastic. Thank you so much, Elon. Uh,

131:08

and next we have some remarks from Feb.

131:11

Go ahead.

131:12

>> Uh, thanks, Travis. So, Q425 was an

131:16

interesting quarter in a couple of

131:18

respects on the autos front. While in

131:21

Q3, we saw a surge in US demand before

131:24

the IRA consumer credit cliff, pulling

131:26

in some demand from Q4.

131:29

In other parts of the world, we saw

131:31

increase in demand leading to record

131:33

deliveries in smaller countries like

131:35

Malaysia, Norway, Poland, Saudi Arabia,

131:38

and Taiwan. While continued strength in

131:40

the rest of Apac and AMI, we therefore

131:43

ended 2025 with a bigger backlog than in

131:46

recent years. Note that none of these

131:48

countries have the latest version of FSD

131:51

supervised available yet. On the storage

131:54

front, we hit yet another record in

131:57

terms of deployments. I would like to

132:00

thank our customers and Tesla in

132:02

continuing this momentum.

132:05

On the automotive margins front, ex uh

132:07

automotive margins excluding credits

132:09

improved sequentially from 15.4 to

132:13

17.9%.

132:14

The automotive gross profit was flat

132:16

sequentially despite 16% lower

132:19

deliveries primarily due to regional mix

132:22

as we had pro proportionately more

132:25

deliveries in APAC and AMIA. As we look

132:29

to 2026 with the progress that has been

132:32

made with autonomy, our focus is on

132:34

ramping production at all our factories.

132:37

Our biggest constraint globally

132:39

continues to be on the battery pack

132:40

front. While our teams have been

132:43

creative in trying to resolve the

132:44

situation by now putting 4680 cells in

132:47

non-structural packs, we continue to

132:49

iterate, improving things from here on.

132:53

FSD adaption continued to improve in the

132:56

quarter, reaching nearly 1.1 million

132:59

paid customers globally. Of these,

133:02

nearly 70% were upfront purchases. It is

133:06

important to note that beginning this

133:08

quarter, we are transitioning fully to a

133:11

subscription-based model for FSD.

133:14

Therefore, net additions to this figure

133:16

will primarily be via subscription model

133:19

and in the short term will impact

133:21

automotive margins.

133:24

On the energy front, we achieved yet

133:27

another u record in terms of gross

133:31

profit for the quarter and ended the

133:33

year with nearly 12.8 8 billion in

133:35

revenue, a 26.6% year year-over-year

133:39

growth. This was the result of higher

133:41

deployments in all regions and continued

133:43

strength in demand for both Megapac and

133:46

Power Wall. As we look at 2026, our

133:49

backlog remains strong, well diversified

133:52

globally, and we expect increasing

133:54

deployments with the launch of Megaac 3

133:57

and Mega Block.

133:59

However, we expect margin compression

134:02

from the increased lowcost competition

134:04

impacts to market from policy

134:06

uncertainty and the cost of tariffs.

134:10

Services and others margin declined from

134:13

10.5% to 8.8% primarily from higher

134:17

employee related cost for service

134:19

centers. As we start preparing for the

134:22

ramp in activity from the growth in the

134:24

fleet size, we did see a momentum in

134:27

margin. We see we did see an improvement

134:29

in margin from our supercharging

134:31

business which is included within

134:33

services and other additionally note

134:35

that our robo taxi business related cost

134:38

while not material are also included

134:40

within this given that this we're still

134:42

in the early phase of our fleet

134:44

deployment and are still doing a lot of

134:46

validation testing the revenue and cost

134:49

per mile metrics are not meaningful to

134:51

discuss at the moment.

134:54

Then on total gross margin front you

134:57

know we ended the quarter with over

134:59

20.1%

135:00

something which we haven't achieved for

135:02

over the last two years. This

135:04

improvement came despite the impact of

135:06

lower fixed cost absorption and the

135:09

impact of tariffs which were in excess

135:11

of 500 million in Q4.

135:15

Operating expenses increased

135:16

sequentially primarily from increased

135:19

stockbased compensation for employees

135:22

and as we started recording charges on

135:26

for one operational mister under our

135:28

2025 co performance award that was

135:31

deemed to be probable over the water

135:33

term. Additionally, our spend on AI

135:36

related initiatives and new products

135:38

like Cybercap, Semi, Optimus and

135:41

Megapra,

135:43

etc. continues to be on educated levels

135:46

and we expect this trend to continue for

135:48

the full year 2026.

135:51

Net income was negatively impacted from

135:53

marktomarket charges on a bitcoin

135:55

holding which depreciated 23% as

135:58

compared to the last quarter and uh the

136:01

impact of unfavorable impact of effects

136:04

primarily from our large intercomp

136:06

boardings.

136:08

On the free cash flow front we ended up

136:10

at 1.4 billion.

136:13

uh you know we did end up capex being

136:16

slightly below our previous guidance of

136:18

9 billion but like as Elon already

136:21

mentioned this year is going to be a

136:24

huge investment year from a capex

136:26

perspective and at the moment we're

136:29

expecting that capex would be in excess

136:31

of 20 billion you know we'll be paying

136:34

for six factories namely the refinery

136:38

LFP factory cybercab semi a new

136:41

megaactory

136:42

the Optimus factory.

136:45

On top of it, we'll also be spending

136:47

money for building our AI compute

136:50

infrastructure and we'll continue

136:52

investing in our existing factories to

136:55

build more capacity and then you know

136:58

also the related infrastructure along

137:00

with it and we'll also further expand

137:03

our fleet of robotaxi and Optimus.

137:06

While this may seem a lot, we believe

137:09

this is the right strategy to position

137:10

the company for the next era and we'll

137:13

make such investments as Eno mentioned

137:15

in a very capital efficient manner. Note

137:18

that this does not include potential

137:20

investments in solar cell manufacturing

137:24

or our tariff as we're still in early

137:26

phase and we plan to provide an update

137:29

in future quarters.

137:32

We're starting not the next chapter, but

137:35

a new book on the progression of this

137:37

company. 2026 year would be when all of

137:41

this began. While at times it feels

137:43

daunting, it is going to be the most

137:46

exciting change in Tesla's history and

137:49

we could not have even dreamed of

137:51

embarking on this journey without the

137:53

support of our customers and our

137:55

investors. Thanks for again showing the

137:58

confidence in us and let's get ready for

138:00

a future of amazing abundance. Thanks.

138:04

>> Great. Thank you very much babe. Um now

138:07

we're going to head over to investor

138:08

questions. As always we will start with

138:10

questions from say.com.

138:12

The first question is today there are

138:15

approximately 90 million cars sold

138:17

globally each year. Uh, does Tesla have

138:20

a view based on its robo taxi ambition

138:22

what this number will be in five or 10

138:25

years and how does this impact Tesla's

138:27

EV strategy to have more models?

138:30

>> Yeah, thanks Travis. As Elon said, the

138:32

future is autonomous and obviously

138:34

autonomy and cyber cab are going to

138:36

change the global market size and mix

138:37

quite significantly. I think that's

138:39

quite obvious. You know, general

138:41

transportation is going to be better

138:42

served by autonomy as it will be safer

138:44

and cheaper. And over 90% of vehicle

138:46

miles traveled are with two or less

138:48

passengers now, which is why we designed

138:49

CyberCad that way. In this new

138:51

autonomous market, we at Tesla have the

138:53

advantage of efficiency, cost, and

138:55

manufacturing at scale that really no

138:56

one else has. And we've built that over

138:58

the last decades. And we believe that

139:01

that segment that we are creating will

139:02

grow millions year-over-year.

139:10

just to add to what Lars said there. Um

139:12

the uh it's with the the point that L

139:17

made which is that 90% of miles driven

139:19

are with one or two passengers or one

139:21

one or two occupants essentially um is

139:24

is a very important one um because uh

139:27

that that implies that that cyber the

139:30

cyber cab which is a dedicated you know

139:32

two-seater um or dedicated robo taxi.

139:36

It's a little confusing with the terms

139:37

robo taxi and cyber cab. Sorry about the

139:39

confusion, but um and in fact in some

139:42

states we're not allowed to use the word

139:43

cab or taxi. So it's going to get even

139:45

more strange. It's going to be like

139:47

cyber vehicle or something cyber car. Um

139:51

but the the the cyber cab which is a

139:54

specific uh vehicle model that we're

139:56

making does not have a steering wheel or

139:58

pedals. Um so this is clearly you know

140:01

there's there's no uh you know there's

140:04

no fallback mechanism here. It's like

140:06

this car either drives itself or it does

140:08

not drive. Um and we expect to start

140:10

production uh in in April. Um as as

140:14

always it's an S-curve of the production

140:18

rate is an S-curve. So starts off very

140:20

slowly and then grows exponentially then

140:22

you hit the linear and then ultimately

140:25

uh you know it as at whatever your

140:27

target volume is. So, um

140:31

but but we we would expect over time to

140:34

make um

140:37

far more cyber cabs than all of our

140:39

other vehicles combined given given that

140:42

90% of of uh distance driven or distance

140:46

being

140:48

distance traveled. Exactly. No longer

140:50

driving. Um

140:53

uh is is is one or two people. Um I

140:57

think it's like 80% is just one. Um so

141:01

it would mean that long-term

141:04

uh cyber cab would make several times

141:08

more cyber cows per year than uh all of

141:10

our other vehicles combined.

141:14

>> Great. Uh thank you so much. Uh the next

141:17

question uh a bit related uh are there

141:21

still plans to launch new models to

141:23

address different price segments and

141:24

vehicle types which could materially

141:27

expand the TAM for Tesla?

141:29

>> Yeah. To to further on what we were just

141:31

talking about, we've launched our least

141:33

expensive models ever over the last few

141:35

months and are continuing to expand um

141:36

that those models globally. And over the

141:39

last decade, we have continually brought

141:40

down the cost of our vehicles without

141:42

sacrificing range, performance or

141:43

premuteness. And we'll continue to do

141:45

that as Vivov said, investing in our

141:47

factories. But these are all trade-offs

141:48

of where we spend our time or money. And

141:50

to Elon's point just now with Cyber Cap

141:53

coming, we are aiming to bring that

141:54

Tesla premium ride experience to our

141:56

largest market yet that could be five or

141:58

10 times our current levels of

141:59

production. This new autonomous market,

142:02

you have to start thinking about us as

142:04

moving to providing transportation as a

142:05

service more than the total yes

142:07

>> addressable market um for the purchased

142:09

vehicles alone. And of course, we do

142:12

have plans to have robo taxis in various

142:14

shapes and sizes, but obviously cyber

142:15

capab will be the grand majority of that

142:17

volume.

142:18

>> Yeah, the vast majority of of miles

142:20

traveled will be autonomous in the

142:23

future. Um

142:25

u you know, I would say probably less

142:27

less than I'm just guessing, but

142:28

probably less than 5% of miles driven

142:30

will be where somebody's actually

142:33

driving the car themselves in the

142:34

future, which may be as low as 1%.

142:38

>> Great.

142:40

The next question is uh historically

142:42

Tesla has spoken about gross margin per

142:44

model. Are there standalone gross margin

142:46

targets for the current models excluding

142:48

the benefits for FFD FSD sales?

142:51

>> You know we've talked about this with

142:53

the previous two questions but

142:55

transportation as we know is changing

142:58

and I think we cannot keep applying the

143:00

same framework from a car sales model to

143:03

the future what we are trying to do. So

143:07

it has to be looked at it more

143:08

holistically you know autonomy software

143:10

will be the driver for growth from now

143:12

on and as we aim to maximize the global

143:16

feed we've been laser focused on cogs

143:20

from our side to make sure because that

143:22

is something which we manage so we will

143:24

keep focusing on that but I think we we

143:27

need to look at it from a different

143:29

dimension

143:30

>> yeah like this cybercab the whole design

143:33

of cybercab was it was to optimize the

143:36

the fully considered cost per mile um of

143:39

autonomous driving. Um and you you it's

143:42

a different design problem than if

143:43

you're trying to design uh cars for

143:46

people who who will be driving uh versus

143:48

being driven. Um and uh and and so so

143:54

cab is like like I said super optimized

143:56

for uh minimum cost per mile and and

144:00

also for a much higher duty cycle. So it

144:03

it would expect uh cyber capab to be

144:06

used,

144:08

you know, probably 50 or 60 hours a week

144:11

um instead of the 10 or 11 hours a week

144:14

that um a a driven vehicle is used. So

144:18

you know, typically people will might

144:20

drive their car for an hour and a half a

144:21

day on average. So it's like 10 hours

144:22

per week out of 168. Um

144:26

uh but I but I I think an autonomous

144:28

vehicle is likely to be

144:31

um used probably five times as often

144:34

which which means that you need to

144:37

design the vehicle for much more wear

144:40

and tear per unit of time uh and much

144:42

more resilience. It's more like a like a

144:44

commercial truck. Um that that's in in

144:48

you know continuous operation or close

144:51

to continuous operation um is is how you

144:54

design a an autonomous vehicle

144:58

and and so we will have uh large

145:02

vehicles in the cyber cab in the future

145:04

that that are designed for full

145:05

autonomy. Um and we we've we've actually

145:07

shown pictures of this and in fact have

145:09

shown prototypes. So this is not exactly

145:11

a secret. In fact, we've given people

145:14

rides in them. So, you know, uh we're

145:17

not we're not keeping this uh hiding

145:19

this light under a bushel here. You

145:21

know, it's like we're literally saying

145:23

what we're going to do and have said

145:24

what we're going to do for a while. Um,

145:26

so you know, I I think longterm would we

145:30

would um really the only vehicles that

145:33

we'll make will be autonomous vehicles

145:35

with the exception of the next

145:37

generation Roadster um which we're

145:40

hoping to debut in April

145:45

hopefully. It's it's going to be

145:47

something out of this world.

145:50

>> Fantastic. Um the next question we'd

145:53

unfortunately have to skip because it's

145:55

not uh related to to Tesla and um we

145:58

would like to uh remind uh folks who use

146:01

uh the say platform um to to please

146:03

focus these questions on on Tesla. Um so

146:07

with that in mind we're going to move on

146:08

to the next question which is what is

146:10

the current bottleneck to increased robo

146:12

taxi deployment and personal use

146:14

unsupervised FSD the safety and

146:17

performance of the most recent models is

146:20

it the safety and performance of the

146:21

most recent models or is it people to

146:23

monitor the robo robo taxis in car or

146:26

remotely or is there some other uh

146:28

blocker I don't know shook if you want

146:30

to kick off on this one.

146:33

Yeah, we have scaled the robot axis

146:36

service that's available to customers

146:38

over the last year in order to just

146:40

learn the scaling problems without

146:42

having uh to like wait for the

146:44

unsupervised. Um basically like two two

146:46

goals. One is like learn as much as

146:48

possible from the fleet with the safety

146:50

monitors and secondly we laser focused

146:53

engineering team to solve the

146:54

unsupervised FSD problem. Uh I think we

146:57

did both like by the end of last year.

146:59

Uh we you know we had a long tale of

147:01

issues that we were able to churn

147:03

through and then uh in the last couple

147:05

of weeks we had started our unsupervised

147:08

uh robot taxi service to public

147:11

customers in Austin. U I think some

147:12

customers took rides last week and also

147:14

service continues today without any rear

147:16

car or something like that. uh

147:18

separately we did scale the fleet size

147:20

uh in the Bay Area and in Austin and

147:22

through that we learned you know issues

147:24

with charging uh and other issues that

147:26

we would have seen once we uh sort of

147:28

like scale the unsupervised fleet. So

147:30

both are happening in parallel. Uh a

147:33

variant of the uh software that's used

147:35

for the robot taxi service was shipped

147:38

to customers with V14. Uh and customers

147:40

saw a huge jump in performance. Uh like

147:42

a lot of uh you know happy feedback from

147:44

customers. Uh so uh and since then we

147:46

have improved the software significantly

147:48

as well and customers will continue to

147:50

see with their own software releases

147:52

that the software is so good that you

147:54

know they're like screaming to remove

147:56

the driver monitoring software um

147:59

because they're bored inside the car too

148:01

much.

148:03

>> Adding to that a little bit with what

148:05

Ashoke said about learning about our

148:06

charging and service uh needs. You know,

148:09

we're using our vast network of charging

148:10

and service centers that really only

148:12

Tesla has in this space to jump start

148:13

our infrastructure buildout needs to get

148:15

ahead of uh robo taxi autonomous vehicle

148:17

demand. And we expect that because of

148:19

this network, we are the only company

148:20

capable of scaling at the rate uh that

148:22

is needed for the uh tsunami of autonomy

148:25

that is coming.

148:26

>> Yeah,

148:28

>> great. Moving on to the next question.

148:31

Um, after the unveil of the Cybertruck,

148:33

uh, Elon stated that if it didn't sell

148:35

well, uh, Tesla would build a more

148:37

conventional looking pickup. How

148:39

practical would it be to create this new

148:41

design on the Cybertruck architecture?

148:43

And could it be conveniently built on

148:45

the existing production lines?

148:47

>> Um, actually in its segment, Cybertruck

148:50

continues to be a leader and is selling

148:52

more than any other electric truck out

148:54

there, while our competition continues

148:56

to pull back. Um, but to the question

148:58

itself from a line standpoint, we always

149:00

design our lines to be super flexible.

149:02

We built 3 and Y on the same line. We

149:04

built SNX on the same line. Still, uh,

149:06

showing that we can do that. The Cybert

149:08

truck line was designed in the same way

149:09

and is one of our most fully ready for

149:11

autonomy platforms.

149:14

>> Yeah. Um,

149:17

but yeah, we we will transition the

149:20

Cybert truck line to just a fully

149:22

autonomous line. Um, and uh, and there's

149:24

there's obviously a market there for

149:27

cargo delivery, like you say, like

149:28

localized cargo delivery within um,

149:31

within a city within a few hundred

149:32

miles, something like that. There's

149:34

there's a pretty there's there's a lot

149:36

of cargo that needs to move uh, locally

149:38

within a city and and um, an autonomous

149:41

cyber truck could be very useful for

149:43

that.

149:45

>> Great. Moving on to the next question.

149:48

Uh, regarding Optimus, could you share

149:50

the current number of units deployed in

149:52

Tesla factories and actively performing

149:54

production tasks? What specific roles or

149:57

operations are they handling? And how

149:58

has their integration impacted factory

150:00

efficiency or output?

150:03

>> Uh, yeah, I mean, we're still very much

150:05

at the early stages of of Optimus. It's

150:08

a it's an R&D still in the R&D phase. Um

150:12

so

150:14

um we have had Optimus do some basic

150:16

tasks in the factory. Um but uh but but

150:20

as we iterate on new versions of

150:23

Optimus, we we deprecate the old

150:25

versions. Um and um and so it's it's

150:28

it's not um I wouldn't say it's like

150:32

it's not it's not it's not in in usage

150:35

in our factories in in a material way.

150:37

more uh so that that the robot can

150:39

learn. Um

150:43

we we wouldn't expect to have um you

150:45

know any kind of significant Optimus

150:48

production volume until probably the end

150:50

of this year.

150:54

>> Great to Optimus Gen 3 is an awesome

150:57

robot that is awesome.

150:58

>> Uh yeah, it's an awesome robot that

151:00

minimizes any differences. It's

151:02

basically it looks like a human. People

151:04

could be easily confused that it's a

151:05

human. Um, and this helps our strategy

151:08

for the AI too because you can learn

151:11

from how humans do their do these tasks

151:13

and it's very easy to teach the robot to

151:15

do in the same way as opposed to

151:17

previous robots.

151:19

>> Yeah. I mean, I guess one thing I should

151:20

say like is you know there's a lot of

151:23

news of like uh you know various

151:25

companies announcing layoffs and and

151:26

whatnot. Uh but you know at our Tesla

151:30

you know factory in Fremont, we actually

151:32

expect to increase headcount over time.

151:35

um and uh and to significantly increase

151:39

uh output from from our factories. So

151:42

yeah, we don't have any layoff plans. Uh

151:45

we we expect to actually increase that

151:46

count.

151:49

>> Great. Uh the next question uh similar

151:53

to the other uh autonomy questions but

151:55

slightly different. Uh when is FSD going

151:57

to be 100% unsupervised?

152:01

Well, it it is 100% unsupervised in FC

152:04

is 100% unsupervising

152:09

with no one in them and no safety

152:10

monitor and no follow car or anything

152:12

like that in Austin right now. Uh for

152:15

for customers we you know we're being

152:19

just very cautious with the roll out. I

152:20

mean we um with each successive version

152:24

as we prove it out and we we make sure

152:26

that there are no sort of unique issues

152:28

in uh you know in in particular cities

152:32

because like sometimes you get like some

152:34

very you know difficult intersection and

152:37

it'll be an intersection where a lot of

152:39

humans have accidents by the way there's

152:40

like some some pretty nutty

152:42

intersections uh where where there a lot

152:45

of humans make mistakes and have

152:46

accidents in in various cities. So we

152:48

want to make sure that uh

152:51

uh you know FSD can handle those um

152:54

unusual intersections

152:57

um like if you take LA for example where

152:59

where Wilshshire and Santa Monica

153:01

combined is is like there's about I

153:04

don't know 20 traffic lights um and

153:06

people are constantly uh having

153:08

accidents there. So um you want to make

153:11

sure that FSD can handle um unique

153:14

things in a particular city. Um so

153:18

uh and and we're also just being

153:20

paranoid about safety. Um but with each

153:23

successful release of of FSD, we will

153:26

reduce the amount of driver monitoring

153:28

that's needed proportionate to the

153:30

safety of of the FSD build.

153:36

>> Great. Um as it relates to robo taxi, um

153:40

what has surprised you about the roll

153:43

out so far? Um we've talked about what's

153:45

constrained uh the fleet expansion to

153:47

date, but uh it appears there are 200

153:49

vehicles based on public tracking. Um is

153:51

that something that we can confirm?

153:55

>> I wouldn't say there's anything that

153:56

like really surprised us because we had

153:58

a large fleet. We had all the metrics.

154:00

So there was not sort of a surprise. It

154:02

was just continued work to grind down on

154:04

the longtail of issues and that's what

154:07

enabled us to launch the unsupervised

154:08

service uh in Austin.

154:13

>> Yeah. And and I mean in in in terms of

154:18

um Robert taxi vehicles carrying paid

154:20

customers uh I I think we're well over

154:25

500 at this point between the Bay Area

154:27

and Austin. Um

154:30

>> yeah this yeah we're varying amounts of

154:31

like vehicles depending on the load but

154:33

yeah you can have like more vehicles

154:34

during like peak times and then like

154:35

fewer vehicles in the off hours.

154:38

>> Yeah. um this will probably you know

154:42

double every month type of thing. It's

154:43

going to it's it's it's on an

154:44

exponential curve.

154:47

>> I mean one other thing people forget

154:50

that you know we've been deliberate on

154:52

all this in the sense that we have the

154:54

supporting infrastructure already been

154:56

in place whether it's service centers

154:59

charging. Yes, we'll have to augment as

155:01

the fleet grows depending upon the

155:04

density of where the demand is and

155:06

whatnot, but it's not something like we

155:10

just stumbled upon it and we're starting

155:12

to we've been at it for years. Yes, not

155:15

every city is designed the same way.

155:18

Same thing. Our infrastructure is also

155:20

not the same in every city, but you have

155:24

to give us credit that it's been a

155:26

journey. And like L said, if there's

155:29

some company which can do it, we've

155:31

already been at it, so we should be able

155:33

to deliver much better.

155:37

>> Great. Um, the next question is about

155:39

Chase Cars, which we already covered.

155:41

Um, so moving on to the last question.

155:44

Um, Elon, you've been spending

155:46

significant personal time on Tesla's

155:48

chip design.

155:49

>> Yeah.

155:49

>> What was the forcing function behind

155:51

this increased involvement? And do you

155:52

think external chip sales will represent

155:54

a significant portion of Tesla's

155:57

valuation by the end of the decade?

156:01

>> Well, I mean there I tend to spend time

156:03

on wherever whatever the most critical

156:05

issue is for the company and um and uh

156:09

completing the AI5 chip design and

156:11

having it be a great chip is um is

156:14

arguably the number one most critical

156:16

thing to get done, which is why I'm

156:17

spending more time on that than

156:19

currently anything else at at Tesla.

156:22

um spend pretty much every Saturday on

156:25

on this and um and every and a chunk of

156:29

every Tuesday. So, it's like a you know,

156:32

if I'm spending my Saturdays on

156:34

something, it's it's going to be

156:36

something pretty important. Um I do

156:38

think AI5 will be um a very good chip.

156:42

Um and I'm I feel quite confident about

156:46

the design at this point. Um and then

156:48

AI6 which will follow that it'll be

156:52

aspirationally would follow that in

156:54

under a year will will be yet another

156:56

big leap beyond AI5. So I feel I feel

157:00

pretty good about our chip strategy

157:02

right now. Um and um but but in terms of

157:08

selling it outside of Tesla, we first

157:10

need to make sure we have enough chips

157:12

for the all of our vehicle production

157:14

and all of our Optimus production. And

157:17

um and then and then we will actually

157:19

use the AI5 chips in our data centers.

157:22

Um we already use the AI4 uh chips in

157:25

our data center. So when we do training,

157:27

it's a combination of the uh AI4

157:30

U chips and uh Nvidia hardware primarily

157:34

that we do training with. So um

157:39

but he said by the end of the decade I

157:41

it's that's like things are changing so

157:43

fast that it's hard to imagine like what

157:45

happens at the end of the decade. Um

157:51

I mean we we we might I mean the

157:55

when I when I look ahead at at say what

157:57

what's the limiting factor for Tesla

157:59

growth um if you go say three or four

158:03

years out I I think it actually is chip

158:05

production

158:06

um is there enough

158:09

uh AI enough AI logic and enough AI

158:13

enough memory enough RAM for um for our

158:18

volume and um and and and right now I

158:22

see that as being the the thing that

158:24

probably limits our

158:27

um our growth in in three or four years.

158:31

Uh which would imply that we're not

158:33

selling chips outside of Tesla because

158:35

we need them. Um

158:38

and um

158:40

in fact I think um

158:44

I I I I think it's going to make sense

158:46

and and this this is definitely going to

158:48

be sort of a controversial

158:51

thing but um I think Tesla needs to

158:54

build a tariff. Um you I mentioned this

158:57

at the shareholder meeting. Um but but

159:01

when when even when we look at the

159:03

output of the best case output of all of

159:06

our key suppliers and I would say even

159:09

beyond suppliers like strategic partners

159:11

uh like Samsung, TSMC and uh Micron um

159:16

the

159:18

and and we say like what's the most you

159:20

could possibly make um then it's it's

159:23

not enough. So, so we I think in order

159:27

to

159:29

remove the constraint, the the probable

159:32

constraint in three or four years, uh we

159:34

we're going to have to build a Tesla

159:37

terra fab, a very big fab that includes

159:42

logic, memory, and packaging

159:44

um domestically. Um and uh and that

159:49

that's actually also going to be very

159:50

important to ensure that um we are

159:54

protected against any geopolitical

159:56

risks.

159:57

Um I think people may be underweighting

160:00

the some of the geopolitical risks that

160:02

are are going to be major factor in in

160:06

in a in a few years. So um

160:11

now you know a lot of people are like

160:13

that's will say like that's crazy. Fabs

160:15

are really hard. I'm like, "Yes, I know

160:18

files are really hard. I don't think

160:19

they're easy."

160:20

Um, but

160:22

uh

160:24

>> we do we do a lot of hard things. You

160:26

know, we didn't used to have car

160:27

factories. We didn't used to have

160:30

battery cell factories or lithium

160:32

refineries or um you know, mega pack

160:35

factories or, you know, all these other

160:37

things. We we we figured it out.

160:41

So, so I think it's uh

160:45

uh I I think we if we don't do the TZ

160:47

Tesla Terrafab, we're we're going to be

160:49

limited by supplier output of um

160:54

of of chips and and I think maybe memory

160:57

is an even bigger um limiter than than

161:01

AI logic. So um you know for example we

161:05

have we have uh uh chip supply deals

161:09

with TSMC in Arizona and Samsung in

161:13

Texas but but currently there are no uh

161:16

advanced memory fabs at scale in the

161:18

United States. There are zero literally

161:20

zero. Um hopefully

161:23

you know Micron will have something

161:26

going in a few years because they are

161:28

headquartered in Idaho you know um where

161:31

they make a lot of potato chips when we

161:33

need to make computer chips too. Um so

161:38

um

161:40

um any work we're working with our

161:42

strategic partners on the chip front

161:44

memory and logic. Uh but I I think uh

161:49

I think we we we got to also try try our

161:51

hand at building um a a large scale fab

161:55

that integrates logic memory and and uh

161:58

packaging. Uh and if we don't do that,

162:01

we're just going to be fundamentally

162:02

limited by supply chain,

162:05

especially if there's some ge geopol if

162:07

if in a worst case geopolitical

162:09

situation, it would be quite quite a

162:10

severe situation. So I think we we it

162:13

would be quite frankly it' be crazy not

162:16

to try the ter tariff app. So um

162:22

yeah,

162:24

>> great.

162:24

>> We'll have we'll have we'll have a

162:25

bigger announcement on this in the

162:26

future.

162:28

>> Awesome. Uh with that uh we're going to

162:31

move on to analyst questions. Uh the

162:33

first analyst uh is Emanuel from Wolf

162:36

Research. Uh Emanuel, please feel free

162:38

to unmute yourself.

162:43

>> Great. Thank you so much. It's Emanuel

162:45

Rosner from Wolf Research. Uh my first

162:47

question is on the on the capex. Uh you

162:50

signal a pretty large increase to over

162:52

$20 billion uh for this year. um was

162:56

hoping to better understand where the

162:57

investments are going. Any way to

162:59

dimension for us uh which of the product

163:02

line or technologies account for the

163:04

bulk of the increase and also um do you

163:07

view this as like one time in nature

163:09

2026 or I guess how much of this is an

163:12

ongoing level of high spending for for a

163:15

number of years and then just finally

163:17

still on that um with that level of

163:20

spending you're going to be burning

163:21

cash. How what how should we think about

163:24

cash balance or any other way to to

163:26

finance this?

163:27

>> Yeah. So yeah, Emmanuel, I tried to put

163:30

this in my opening remarks too, but I'll

163:32

try and go a little bit deeper. Uh

163:37

there's about six factories which we are

163:40

starting production in this year. So

163:43

there's a lot of cash capex which is

163:46

going into that. Then as we are trying

163:49

to scale uh Optimus, we need a lot more

163:53

compute. So we're putting more money

163:55

towards compute as well

163:57

>> and then

163:57

>> for training

163:58

>> for training

163:59

>> and then we're also sp going to be

164:02

spending money to expand the capacity at

164:06

you know existing factories.

164:09

on top of it, you know,

164:12

we're just keep in mind that we're not

164:15

none of these numbers which I shared of

164:17

of 20 billion factors in anything to do

164:21

with the solar fab or the the

164:25

semiconductor chip fab. Those would be

164:28

as Elon mentioned would come later on.

164:32

And you you think uh your second part of

164:35

your question was is this oneoff or

164:39

would we expect more? I think we're

164:42

getting into this investment phase

164:45

because we have big aspirations and when

164:48

you look at it some of these aspirations

164:50

are I call them as infrastructure play

164:54

especially if you have to do a chip fab

164:57

and we have to do a solar cell

164:59

manufacturing fab those are

165:00

infrastructure plays and that that that

165:04

fun that funding takes a little bit

165:06

longer and you you would be in an

165:09

investment cycle for a little bit

165:10

longer.

165:12

Initially uh part third part of your

165:14

question was how are we going to fund

165:16

it? Uh initially obviously we have over

165:19

44 billion of cash and investments on

165:22

the books. So we'll use our internal

165:24

resources but there are ways where we

165:26

can fund it especially when we look at

165:29

the robot taxi fleet because you know

165:32

anytime anytime you have a consistent

165:35

stream of cash flow you can go and get

165:39

money from the banks and we have had

165:42

conversations with banks about it and

165:45

that is something how we're going to do

165:47

it and then on the infrastructure play

165:49

side yeah like I said We don't have a

165:53

number yet, but given that it's it's an

165:57

infrastructure play, it's a longer tail,

166:00

we will have to look at a little bit

166:02

more in terms of how we fund it, whether

166:05

it's through more debt or other means.

166:12

>> Great. Uh, our next question comes from,

166:15

uh, Andrew from Morgan Stanley. Andrew,

166:18

please feel free to unmute yourself.

166:21

>> Great. Thanks so much for for taking the

166:23

question. Um I I just want to start on

166:25

the DXAI investment that you guys

166:28

announced today. You know, you talked

166:29

about there being some collaboration,

166:32

you know, between the companies. So, I'm

166:34

just hoping to get more more information

166:36

or or if you're hoping you could shed

166:38

more light on on what that looks like

166:40

and and maybe how the work XAI is doing

166:43

uh can be leveraged at at Tesla and and

166:45

vice versa. Yeah, I mean if you if you

166:48

looked at the disclosure which we also

166:50

put in there, we do talk about this is

166:52

literally a furtherance of our master

166:55

plan 4 and even today if you look at

166:59

Tesla vehicles

167:01

we are using Grock in there and as we

167:06

look at things whether we can do it

167:08

ourselves. Yes, there are a lot of

167:10

things which we can do ourselves. But if

167:12

there are things which XCI can help

167:14

accelerate our progress,

167:17

then why should we not do that? And that

167:20

is the reason why we've gone ahead with

167:23

such an investment because this this is

167:26

part of the strategic initiative because

167:30

as it is if you remember I talked about

167:32

how many things which we're doing

167:34

ourselves. if there are ways and means

167:36

we can find efficient ways for others to

167:39

help us

167:41

and XI literally fits into that mold. So

167:44

that's why we went ahead with it and we

167:48

just had like a lot of investors ask us

167:50

to do this as there was like a lot of

167:54

you know investor

167:56

uh Tesla shareholders said like we we

167:59

should invest in XAI. So that's like

168:01

we're just doing what shareholders like

168:03

asked us to do pretty much. Um but but

168:07

Grock will be you know I think very

168:09

helpful in say maximizing the efficiency

168:12

of the management of the of a large

168:14

autonomous fleet. So I mean if you got a

168:16

an autonomous fleet that's you know in

168:20

the future 10 million vehicles or tens

168:22

of millions of vehicles then optimizing

168:24

the efficient use of that fleet uh gro

168:27

will be uh I think way way better than

168:30

any huristic solution um or or sort of

168:34

manually managed solution um and if you

168:36

say managing um say a large team of

168:40

Optimus robots to build a factory or

168:42

build a refiner you know an an say a

168:45

rare hypothetic like a this is a

168:47

hypothetical example a rare earth uh or

168:50

refinery um which we do desperately need

168:53

in in in America um uh then you you you

168:58

say well who like what's going to

169:01

organize uh the Optimus robots to to

169:04

build that or refinery um that would you

169:07

know you need kind of need a an

169:08

orchestra conductor and so then Grock

169:10

would be uh kind of the orchestra

169:12

conductor for the Optimus robots to

169:14

build uh hypothetically and where it

169:17

might it might not be hypothetical in

169:18

the future. I'm just saying it's not not

169:20

currently on our plans, but um you know

169:24

we do we do need a lot more um or

169:26

refining capacity in the US. So then

169:30

then what's going to manage they say

169:32

let's say a thousand Optimus robots uh

169:34

to to do

169:49

you're on mute right now, so I'm not

169:51

sure if you're trying to ask a follow-up

169:52

question.

169:57

Ready? We're going to move on to the

169:59

next question, uh, which is is coming

170:01

from Dan Levi at Barclays.

170:09

and please feel free.

170:10

>> Great. Great. Thank you. Um Elon, you

170:14

you talked about some of the constraints

170:16

on memory. Given the very tight supply,

170:21

uh are there any near-term constraints

170:22

on procuring memory? And if there are,

170:26

to what extent could you look at

170:28

modifying the functionality in the

170:29

vehicles similar to what you did in 21

170:31

when we saw shortages on MCUs and maybe

170:34

how are you thinking about bridging in

170:36

the next few years?

170:39

Well, we Tesla the Tesla AI is is very

170:43

compute efficient and very memory

170:44

efficient. Um, you know, so I think one

170:46

of the metrics one should consider for

170:48

for any given AI model is um the

170:51

intelligence per gigabyte. Um,

170:54

especially when you're constrained on

170:56

RAM having um a an AI that has very high

171:00

intelligence density per gigabyte. So

171:03

you can say like what like for a given

171:04

number of gigabytes, how much

171:05

functionality can you get out of it? Um,

171:08

I actually think Tesla is ahead of the

171:10

rest of the world in intelligence

171:12

density of AI by

171:15

an order of magnitude or more. like it's

171:18

this is going to sound like a pretty

171:19

bold statement, but I'm I kind of know

171:22

what the you know what the intelligence

171:25

efficiency of the of the big models are

171:27

like Groank and and like the honest and

171:29

and and you a bunch of the other models

171:31

and Tesla's AI is like in terms of it me

171:34

memory efficiency

171:36

more than an order of magnitude better.

171:39

Um so

171:42

um

171:45

so so that puts us in a pretty good

171:47

position actually for for scaling and we

171:49

we don't we don't we actually do we we

171:51

we do think that there's

171:54

we do have a solution for logic and

171:56

memory um for let's say the next u

172:02

roughly 3 years. Um but if you start

172:05

going beyond three years and we look at

172:07

the scaling plans um and how many fabs

172:09

are getting built and especially if you

172:11

factor in geopolitical uncertainty

172:15

um you know there's always there's

172:17

always risk that maybe the those chips

172:20

don't arrive uh that people were

172:22

expecting to arrive. Um so that's uh

172:25

that's why I think we we need to have

172:27

more fab capacity in the US uh just in

172:30

case uh you know chips don't stop

172:33

arriving for any reason. Um

172:37

but you know this is this is really

172:39

existential for for Tesla because uh if

172:42

you know Optimus is completely useless

172:44

without an AI chip. It's not like you

172:47

know at least the cars we can put

172:48

steering wheels and pedals in uh or

172:50

retrofit them if if need be.

172:52

Uh but Optimus is just a mannequin

172:54

without you know it's like the tin man

172:57

or whatever um from the Wizard of Oz but

173:00

but even worse at least the 10 man could

173:02

walk um Optimus won't even be able to

173:05

just sit there um without an AHF. So we

173:08

we've got a a good solution for

173:11

a significant scale through you know for

173:12

the next uh roughly 3 years. Beyond that

173:17

uh we we will be supplier limited. Um

173:20

and so we we've got to figure out some

173:22

game plan to not not be supplier

173:24

limited.

173:27

>> Great. Um our next question is going to

173:29

come from George I can accord. George

173:31

please feel free to unmute yourself.

173:35

>> Hi everyone. Thank you for taking my my

173:37

question. So you there been a surge of

173:40

startups particularly from China

173:41

entering the humanoid market and

173:44

wondering what the long-term competitive

173:46

advantages uh that keep Tesla ahead are

173:49

and and how based on what you've seen

173:51

will optimist fundamentally differ from

173:54

these competitors. Thank you.

173:59

>> Well, I I do think that the by by far

174:02

the biggest competition for humanoid

174:03

robots will be from China. Um, China is

174:06

incredibly good at scaling

174:07

manufacturing.

174:09

Um, actually quite good at AI as you can

174:12

see from you know the the open source or

174:15

not the open source but the the sort of

174:16

I guess some of them are open actually.

174:18

Um, but basically the the the models

174:21

that China is distributing for free um

174:23

are actually quite good and they keep

174:26

getting better. So, China is very good

174:27

at AI, very good at manufacturing,

174:30

um, and and will definitely be the the

174:33

toughest competition for Tesla.

174:36

We to the best of our knowledge, we we

174:38

don't see any significant competitors

174:41

outside of China. Um, uh, but China will

174:45

definitely be be tough competition.

174:48

There's there's no two ways about it. Um

174:52

so um I I always think like people uh

174:57

sort of outside of China kind of under

174:59

underestimate China. Um

175:02

China's asker next level. So um you know

175:07

I guess you know we we we're going to

175:10

build we we think we think Optimus will

175:12

be much more capable than any robot that

175:15

we are aware of under development uh in

175:18

China. Um

175:21

so we we think we'll be ahead in terms

175:23

of the uh real world intelligence

175:27

uh the electromechanical dexterity

175:30

especially the hand design which is uh

175:34

by far the hottest thing in the robot

175:36

and in fact I'd say there's there's

175:37

there's really uh three hard things

175:40

about uh humanoid robots. the bu

175:44

building a an incredible hand that that

175:48

has the same degrees of freedom and

175:50

dexterity as a human hand is an an

175:53

incredibly difficult engineering

175:54

challenge. Um then there's the uh real

175:58

world AI uh and and scaling production.

176:02

Those are the three hardest problems by

176:05

far for humanoid robots.

176:08

Um, I think we're we're Tesla has is the

176:11

only company with that actually has all

176:12

three of those components. Um,

176:16

so yeah, great. And our last question is

176:20

going to come from Colin at Oenheimer.

176:23

Colin, please feel free to unmute

176:24

yourself.

176:27

>> Thanks so much. Um, guys, you know, you

176:29

talked a lot about the capex spend, but

176:31

um, you know, this is an incredibly

176:32

ambitious technology development program

176:34

that you're talking about. Can you talk

176:36

a little bit about the R&D spend and and

176:38

how you're thinking about the synergies

176:40

of of the different components, you

176:41

know, particularly on the hardware side.

176:43

Um, you know, if you think about, you

176:44

know, batteries into into chips into

176:46

into memory and and the efficiency of

176:48

the system and what sort of advantages

176:50

you think you'll end up getting out of

176:52

um, you know, some of these

176:53

purpose-built uh, devices that you'll

176:55

end up integrating into multiple in

176:57

markets.

177:02

Well, really all we're trying to do is

177:04

make sure that we we can uh scale to

177:08

very high volume with autonomous

177:10

vehicles with humanoid robots

177:14

and uh and and that we uh address um

177:20

geopolitical risk um which I think

177:25

you know there's so many companies out

177:28

there that are asleep at the switch with

177:29

regard to geopolitical geopolitical risk

177:32

uh they're like or or they just have

177:33

their head in the sand and hope nothing

177:35

bad will happen. Um I'm way more

177:39

paranoid than that. Um I always think of

177:42

Andy Grove's famous statement, only the

177:44

paranoid survive.

177:46

You know, why did he come up with that

177:47

statement at Intel?

177:51

H let's think. Um so I'm I think

177:56

there's a lot of wisdom in that

177:57

statement. Um, so we're going to be

178:00

paranoid uh and make sure that uh we can

178:03

continue to build uh batteries and

178:07

robots and AI chips no matter what

178:09

happens. Um and companies that don't do

178:13

that, a bunch of them will cease to

178:15

exist.

178:17

>> Yeah. I mean remember all this comes out

178:20

of necessity. It's not that we want to

178:22

do it. It's just we are we have no

178:24

choice.

178:25

>> Yeah. I mean, we built the most advanced

178:27

lithium refinery in the world, by the

178:29

way. It's it's not just like our lithium

178:31

refinery in Corpus Christie is not just

178:33

a copy of what others have done. It's

178:35

it's an entirely new process that is

178:37

fundamentally more efficient and more

178:38

advanced than anything else in the

178:39

world. The same is true of our of our

178:41

cathode refinery here in Austin. Um and

178:45

um and we wish others would build this.

178:48

Can can other people please for the love

178:51

of God help

178:52

>> the name of all that is holy can others

178:54

please build this build build this stuff

178:56

>> it's not the first time you

178:58

>> exactly I mean this is not the first

179:00

time you've said something like this

179:02

>> like why do we have to build these

179:04

things why can others not also please

179:07

can someone else pull these things I

179:09

mean this is it's very hard to build

179:11

these things um we build them out of

179:14

desperation not for any not because

179:17

nobody else is building lithium

179:19

refineries and cathode refineries. Um,

179:22

you know, we're pretty much the not just

179:24

the largest, but also the only um

179:27

lithium refinery and cathode refinery in

179:29

America. Um, so

179:32

um

179:34

yeah, so

179:37

we're making moves to make sure that no

179:39

matter what happens, Tesla will prosper.

179:44

>> Great. Um, unfortunately that's all the

179:46

time we have for Q&A today. Uh, we

179:48

really appreciate everyone's questions

179:49

and we look forward to talking to you

179:50

next quarter. Thank you very much and

179:52

goodbye.

179:54

>> Very cool.

179:59

>> Damn, that was incredible. That was

180:02

really good. If anybody can hear me.

180:05

Testing. Testing. One, two, three.

180:07

>> Here we are. We can hear you.

180:09

>> That was super exciting. I mean, there's

180:12

so much to unpack there. I wrote down 26

180:16

bomb-dropping nuggets as I normally do

180:19

every call. I don't even know where to

180:21

begin.

180:22

And I'm watching the stock price. Once

180:24

they mentioned the capex and reason for

180:27

capex, the stock price fell 20 bucks.

180:29

It's like Trafi is like, "No, you just

180:31

got to save money. No reinvestment

180:34

during the most transformative time in

180:36

the history of the planet. I always

180:37

describe the asteroid that's going to

180:39

hit this earth and that's AI." and

180:42

they're ready uh and they're planning

180:44

and they're prepared. And Andy Grove is

180:46

one of my favorites. I read that book

180:48

decades ago. Only the paranoid survive.

180:50

I'm so glad he quoted that, too. I

180:52

thought it was fantastic. And the

180:54

analyst questions, I mean, for God's

180:56

sake, why do they even allow those

180:57

people to ask questions? Anyway, enough

180:59

for me.

181:01

>> I didn't feel they were like that, but

181:03

uh but they were worth I mean,

181:05

especially the one on Copex was was

181:06

worth it. And uh I love like at what

181:10

point way had had explained it the first

181:12

time, calmly did it a second time

181:14

without adding any new information.

181:16

Right. It was there we were. I mean he

181:18

did mention the word debt and I think

181:20

that may become necessary especially for

181:23

the two big infrastructure um projects

181:26

which are solar cells and the the tariff

181:29

app because I mean that's just so

181:31

gigantic. But let's just talk about

181:33

what's happening in 2026. So it's 20

181:36

billion in 2026 which is the double of

181:39

what they had budgeted for this year but

181:40

this year in the end it was a little bit

181:42

less right it was just below nine. Um so

181:45

those 20 billion are going into the six

181:48

projects we know

181:51

which are let me just get my notes which

181:52

I read which is the refinery the cyber

181:55

caps the semi the new mega and the two

181:58

optimus lines right so so those are the

182:01

budgeted also budgeted is the AI compute

182:05

and the increased capacity of the lines

182:08

that will survive which are not the S

182:09

and the X why we talk about that um we

182:12

had heard rumors about that that it end

182:14

in June. That seems now to to be

182:17

confirmed. What I absolutely loved is

182:19

that at multiple occasion he mentioned

182:22

the expanded fleet of robo taxi and

182:26

Optimus that they keep to themselves. Um

182:29

I mean he mentioned it in terms of why

182:32

there was an increase in operating cost,

182:34

right? Just because the the the

182:36

personnel that is needed for that, the

182:38

stuff that's needed cost more money. But

182:40

he also mentioned it in the copex

182:43

situation. So, I thought that was very

182:45

interesting um because it confirms that

182:48

they are building it out now, right?

182:50

They're building it out and they have a

182:52

plan how they will build it out over the

182:53

next uh over the next 12 months. So, I

182:56

love that. I I also loved that they are

182:59

considering other options once it comes

183:01

to the big infrastructure projects which

183:03

are not for 2026, right? 2026 we have

183:06

our plan, we have the route to uh to

183:09

these new six factories and whatever

183:11

else is coming. So I was absolutely

183:14

happy with it. I have to say I have

183:15

notes everywhere but I think I've said

183:17

the most important ones.

183:21

>> So very very

183:24

>> Wait. Isn't it very very clear guys

183:26

though that this is a robo taxi

183:28

transportation as a service uh business.

183:31

Um they are no longer going to create

183:34

new cars that's going to be drivable.

183:37

You know the I mean I mean they can say

183:39

all they want. I mean, clearly there's

183:40

still a plan B if they can't do it. But

183:42

if production for cyber cabs is slow, as

183:45

he said many times, then they're going

183:47

to expand to these cities or states, and

183:49

even if the others don't catch up,

183:50

there's enough he thinks to be able to

183:52

roll out the cyber cabs as robo taxis. I

183:55

don't know how. Did you guys hear

183:57

anything else different than I did about

183:59

that?

184:05

He did mention uh it would you know

184:08

putting people's cars in the fleet would

184:11

be earn more than the actual cost of the

184:13

car the lease. He did mention that

184:15

again. He's mentioned that before. He

184:16

didn't give the timeline of when people

184:18

would be able to do that but he did

184:21

reiterate it which means he can't turn

184:23

back after mentioning it like five

184:24

times.

184:28

>> Also he did mention that we should

184:30

expect headcount of Tesla employees in

184:33

the factories up. remember we had uh

184:35

earlier a discussion on whether we would

184:38

be in this annual February to April

184:41

moment where he is um laying people off.

184:45

I don't I don't think that's on the

184:47

table at the moment. I think they are

184:48

really ramping up in all in all senses.

184:55

just to put Tesla's capex spin into

184:57

perspective and Herbert and I actually

184:59

did a show on this recently but uh

185:01

Amazon is spending uh in Q3 spent 35

185:05

billion in a quarter.

185:07

>> Yeah.

185:08

>> Yeah. But nobody spends as efficiently

185:10

as Tesla you know.

185:11

>> Exactly.

185:12

>> And I mentioned and mean

185:14

>> and I mentioned Meta planning 135

185:16

billion this year.

185:18

>> Yeah.

185:18

>> I mean the the capex loves it.

185:22

>> Yeah. the capex uh the relative capex by

185:25

these companies the spend it shows you

185:28

how much crazy waste there is and and

185:31

and I think it was Ron Baron also

185:34

described so many times he's he's been

185:36

doing this for 50 70 years or something

185:38

but he said he's never seen such ability

185:40

to turn capital into cash flow back into

185:45

more cash flow I can't remember the

185:47

exact way he fa made it out but it was

185:49

really impressive anyway

185:51

>> uh Jeeoff you sounded like you weren't

185:53

too thrilled.

185:55

>> Yeah, I mean um I mean overall I mean

185:58

I'm thrilled uh with with what they're

186:01

doing over a multi-year time frame, but

186:03

for a a 90-day earnings call, it felt

186:07

like it was all over the place a bit in

186:10

terms of the conversation. Again,

186:12

there's this there's this need since

186:14

Tesla looks so far out. There's seemed

186:16

like there's this desire, let's talk

186:17

about tariff adabs that are four or five

186:20

years out, let's talk about other things

186:22

when honestly

186:24

would be better to have a discussion a

186:27

pur majority of the discussion of last

186:29

quarter, current quarter, next quarter

186:32

and then leave the strategy like to like

186:34

we we had an investor day. We have all

186:36

these other venues to go through the

186:39

strategy and the product announcements

186:40

for the company. Even Tesla does this. I

186:43

don't understand why we say we're

186:45

spending this capex to increase factory

186:48

capacity. We're hiring people, but we

186:50

don't give any any semblance of a volume

186:53

commit. I didn't I didn't understand. Um

186:57

I mean really the only statement that's

186:58

in the earnings deck is we're going to

187:01

maximize you know utilization which is

187:03

what basically is kind of a throwaway

187:06

comment. So I would have liked to have

187:07

seen okay are we going to be what's

187:09

going on with unit volume for the year.

187:12

Uh it would be interesting to just

187:13

understand that. And then on this this

187:16

capex span I just think it was

187:17

introduced in a way

187:20

that just let it it was just basically

187:23

it it's introduced in the way when when

187:25

hyperscalers and big companies like this

187:27

introduce and throw a statement out

187:29

there like this and then they don't say

187:31

well it's we're we're going to do this

187:33

and we think these businesses are going

187:35

to be you know exponentially more gross

187:37

margin and accretive to the bottom line

187:39

over this time frame. you know, it just

187:41

it leaves it to be kind of just whacked

187:43

around um by the analysts. Um I So

187:50

anyway, I just I didn't hear enough

187:52

about

187:54

direct responses in terms of now the the

187:57

doubling the the robo taxis every month.

188:00

That was a fairly definitive statement

188:02

that that's one I think we can hang our

188:04

hats on and that was one of the only

188:07

things I think you could could hang your

188:10

hat on. And then I think we spent too

188:11

much time on the SNX in the beginning. I

188:14

don't understand. Like we grew 38%

188:17

in FSD subscriptions over a year, which

188:20

is kind of a big deal for a SAS business

188:23

that's ready to take off. And we spent

188:25

less time accentuating that point of our

188:29

SAS business is going to go through the

188:31

roof and we spent a lot of time on you

188:34

retiring again a product announcement.

188:37

So anyway, I just I just had some

188:38

constructive

188:40

uh criticism on that. Um, but overall I

188:43

mean I love what we're building. I love

188:44

the products we're building. I love

188:45

where we're going. Just more of a 30 60

188:48

90 conversation.

188:50

>> Jeff, why do you expect

188:52

>> why would you expect this call to be any

188:54

better than every call that's come

188:56

before it? I mean Tesla just don't have

188:59

a they don't have a communication skill

189:04

that you know we would expect a large

189:07

public company to have. They just don't,

189:09

you know, have they have Elon's method

189:14

of communication. We understand it, but

189:17

it's not going to be a corporate uh

189:20

communication.

189:22

I I I I couldn't more about the

189:27

quarterly call. This is not a standard

189:31

cordly call but um you know

189:35

my take away was Lori actually said the

189:40

one thing that I'm trying to people

189:45

is the only company with infrastructure

189:46

capable of supporting you know an end to

189:49

end robot taxi across the United States

189:55

issue that nobody understands

189:58

So determinative, I should say.

190:03

Very bad communication.

190:05

>> Yeah,

190:07

>> great point though, Larry, but yeah,

190:08

it's hard to hear you, but fantastic

190:10

point. Thank you. Yeah, you're right.

190:14

>> I'll just kind of agree with Jeff. Um,

190:18

it's just it's not that to me that they

190:21

we we should expect something different

190:23

for them. It's like they just there's an

190:24

opportunity here for them to seize on

190:27

and they're not even focusing on the

190:29

great work they did. I think it's a

190:31

disservice to their employees who own

190:33

shares in the company. It's a disservice

190:35

to all the people that are in the front

190:37

line for what's the future. And I agree,

190:39

they spent way too much time on SNX. Um

190:42

they they didn't highlight to me what

190:43

the most important things are. They they

190:45

had no excitement in their voice. Like

190:48

that deck screen, we're excited. We're

190:51

ready. you know, the future is here.

190:53

We're on the precipice of this. We're

190:55

ready to go. But the call screamed,

190:58

yeah, we don't want to be here. We're

191:01

gonna phone it in. That That's what it

191:03

screamed. And it's just like like it's

191:05

just a missed opportunity. Like they're

191:07

missing the layups. Like these are the

191:09

easy shots that they're not taking that,

191:11

you know, it's it's just kind of crazy

191:13

to me. Um, but I I will say that Elon

191:17

was very excited to talk about Micron

191:19

and Micron's up more in the after hours

191:22

than what Tesla is. So, you know, it's

191:26

it's funny circles what we were talking

191:28

about before the call started. How I was

191:30

talking about is the chips and then from

191:32

there it's memory and the data centers

191:34

and energy. Well, look at Micron. Elon

191:37

was very clear about it. Energy, chips,

191:41

and memory. I mean it's

191:43

>> this is where Elon's head is, right?

191:44

Elon is always thinking about the

191:46

future. He's figured he says to himself

191:48

FSE solved. I've got Ashok taking care

191:51

of it. It looks like he didn't say that

191:52

once on the call.

191:54

>> Well, he has said it several times. I

191:56

guess in his mind he's not going to.

191:57

It's already done. Ash repeating himself

192:00

and he couldn't repeat that one line

192:04

>> on the earnings call.

192:06

>> Yeah, you're not here.

192:09

I think uh guys don't own Tesla call.

192:13

Why don't we do a Tesla call a phone

192:16

Tesla call and we do the call.

192:19

>> Let's do it.

192:21

>> Elon here.

192:22

>> So I I think this was this call was

192:24

about wasn't about quarterly numbers.

192:26

Okay. What's in the deck is in the deck.

192:28

People can read that. They were giving

192:30

us the road map for the next

192:33

manifesto for Tesla's AI and autonomy

192:35

empire. That's it. We're giving up on

192:38

cars. We want cars to drive themselves

192:40

and we want robots to build all

192:42

over the planet all at the same time.

192:43

And yes, we're going to build a terapab

192:45

and yes, we're going to build solar

192:47

factories and yes, we built the best

192:48

lithium factory in the world. I mean,

192:50

they're laying out stuff that nobody is

192:53

focused on. But what they're focused on

192:55

is a way bigger picture than like just

192:58

just compare for a second Tesla to any

193:00

other company on the planet. I don't

193:01

care if you go a car company or a

193:03

Chinese robot company or anything else.

193:04

There is nothing like it. concern, tell

193:07

us what you think.

193:10

>> Well, just let's focus on SNX for a

193:12

second. I know Nick doesn't want to, but

193:15

>> let me tell you how important this is.

193:17

>> Let me tell you how important this is,

193:18

right? So SNX 50,000 vehicles a year.

193:21

Let's say the ASP is $100,000,

193:24

right? That's five billion in revenue.

193:27

Okay, so not bad. Nice little business.

193:30

If you sell a million Optimus, produce a

193:34

million Optimus in that same space they

193:36

make SNX, okay? And if the revenue per

193:39

year on Optimus is $100,000,

193:42

that's a $100 billion business. You just

193:46

20xed that manufacturing, the value of

193:49

that manufacturing space. Further, the

193:52

margins on Optimus are going to be

193:54

massive compared to SNX margins. They

193:57

probably 50xed the gross margin

194:00

of product coming out of that

194:02

manufacturing line. That is why the SNX

194:04

announcement is so important.

194:06

>> They didn't say that.

194:08

>> They didn't say that at all. Well,

194:09

>> and number two, Cybertruck is going to

194:11

become an autonomous vehicle. That was a

194:14

fantastic comment. And I I was saying

194:16

that earlier.

194:19

>> Um

194:21

yeah,

194:22

>> I think we're shilling right now. I'm

194:23

going to be honest.

194:25

No, no. These are things that were said,

194:27

but nobody picks up on it. Like what

194:29

what Herbert mentioned, you know, using

194:32

the Cybert truck like they already have

194:34

50 of them at SpaceX right now, but now

194:36

have them running around carrying stuff

194:38

for contractors. If you've ever done any

194:41

type of construction work, you know

194:43

where builders lose most of their time?

194:45

Going to the hardware store. Imagine

194:47

say, "Hey, I need 10 pieces of plywood

194:51

in the next hour." instead of them

194:53

losing two hours going to the store, it

194:55

just comes in an hour. Like the these

194:57

are things that nobody's really thinking

194:59

about and I think it's huge. And now the

195:00

the hardware stores put stuff in your

195:02

truck. So Herbert, good call out. But

195:04

these are things one of the 50 nuggets

195:07

that are completely going to be ignored.

195:08

>> Jeeoff, look at the five analyst

195:10

questions. Okay. R&D spend, humanoid

195:13

robot competition,

195:15

>> constraints in memory,

195:17

>> of XAI investment,

195:20

you know, and large capital spend.

195:23

That that's the question. So they they

195:25

have to answer it.

195:26

>> Yeah.

195:27

>> Why they're doing it.

195:28

>> Yeah. No, just more of like when you

195:30

introduced and that that's a bomb when

195:32

you're going to double your capex.

195:35

uh there should be I think a very kind

195:39

of healthy roll out of what we're doing,

195:42

why we're doing it, and generate some

195:45

and give some real stats. Like if we're

195:47

going to build this robo taxi fleet,

195:49

what do we expect in miles in revenue by

195:52

the end of the year? Like some sort of

195:53

window, can we get a window on on robo

195:56

taxi revenue for the year? Um and

196:00

Optimus Optimus felt like a bit of a a

196:03

push out if if it's just production

196:06

start by the end of the year. Um that

196:11

that's the end of the year. That's not

196:13

an earlier part of 2026.

196:16

Um but anyway, like they could he said

196:19

he said in a few months for optimism.

196:21

>> He said end of the year.

196:24

>> I wrote down in a few months.

196:27

I think he's gonna unveil

196:28

>> it was on the same call.

196:29

>> It's unveiled in a few months, but

196:31

production starts at the end of the

196:32

year.

196:33

>> Optimus 3. Okay.

196:35

>> Yeah. So that fel So what they could

196:37

have done with that the Optimus

196:39

commentary really quickly is just all

196:41

right. That's fine, but we're going to

196:42

produce thousands of them this year as

196:44

part of that effort to get to

196:46

production. We think we're going to

196:47

deploy this many like get a number out

196:49

there. I think that's something they're

196:51

they're in the window they could have

196:52

committed.

196:52

>> And he's already saying that we're as

196:54

lucky as the smallest part and we I'm so

196:56

he's probably not saying a number

196:58

anymore.

196:58

>> I know. I know exactly what he's by the

196:59

way. I know exactly what he's saying. I

197:01

I feel him uh on that. But uh but but

197:04

yeah, you like like I said, there's a

197:06

lot there is a lot to be like this.

197:08

There's no company that has a portfolio

197:10

like this company has. I'm just more of

197:12

trying to think of the like a 90-day

197:15

earnings call. What do you want to

197:17

articulate? What should we expect for

197:19

the entire year? This is kind of your

197:20

first call for the year. What should we

197:23

expect in the first quarter, first half?

197:26

I think we got some things like I said

197:27

with robo taxi doubling month.

197:30

Um but kind of looking for a little bit

197:33

more. When are we going to get a full

197:35

unsupervised city? Uh what and where is

197:39

that? And and then what are the next

197:41

ones? So, I think there's a couple of

197:42

things I I I would have wished um they

197:44

would have have gone through, but again

197:46

to and then where's this cash going to

197:48

come from if if we're going to go there

197:52

was an interesting question about the

197:53

run rate of capex is the run rate moving

197:56

to 20 billion or not? Because now we've

197:58

just if we've moved to 20 billion

198:02

um or do we have two two years of runway

198:04

roughly on what it's interesting thing

198:07

but I think there there's multiple ways

198:09

I think they could finance

198:11

um finance. It's not all it's not a lot

198:13

of cash.

198:14

>> Yeah, I think I think that I I want to

198:16

jump into that. So, at the moment, we

198:18

have 44 billion of of cash. Then he made

198:21

a very uh thought through remark that

198:24

the robo taxi fleet will have redundant

198:29

revenue against which it is really easy

198:32

to get loans that they are already

198:34

talking to banking partners to offset

198:36

that with loans. So, I thought that was

198:39

really uh important. And then the third

198:40

point was that the infrastructure plays.

198:43

So that's the solar cell fab and the

198:44

chips fab are outside of these 20

198:47

billion that those need longer term

198:50

plans and there either debt or other

198:53

solutions

198:54

are the the point of of coming out of

198:57

them. So yes, I do believe there will be

198:58

I mean we should all remember that Tesla

199:00

is nearly zero debt, right? And now is

199:03

sitting on 44 billion. So financing this

199:06

all either through their own means or by

199:09

offsetting certain um recurring revenues

199:13

or by by um debt structures which can be

199:17

difficult, you know, can be different

199:18

from getting a bank loan. I mean they

199:20

will obviously they're very smart at

199:22

that. Um I'm I'm not worried of where

199:24

the money comes from. I I'm zero worried

199:26

about that. And other than the 20

199:28

billion for this year, none of this is

199:30

for 2026.

199:33

Guys, can you hear me better now?

199:35

>> Yes.

199:37

>> Yes. So, I just want to I just No. Or

199:40

yes.

199:41

>> It's very crackly.

199:42

>> It's crackling.

199:44

>> Okay.

199:45

>> We might be crackling.

199:48

>> Okay.

199:48

>> Where's your mic? Where's your

199:49

microphone? Where's your microphone?

199:51

>> It's in my ears. I'm I'm in the

200:06

better.

200:07

>> Oh, yeah. Way better.

200:09

>> Better.

200:09

>> I can't hear you guys.

200:11

>> Yes, way better.

200:12

>> All right, never mind. I I was just if

200:14

you can hear me all I just wanted to say

200:16

is that I've been forecasting this

200:20

increase in capex for two years or two

200:23

and a half years was particularly about

200:26

it when Gary wanted to

200:30

wanted to buy the shares back this is

200:32

coming this has been coming for a while

200:34

I saw it coming you know for this time

200:37

and it's going to become

200:40

uh we're going to have more and more

200:42

money in particularly if we're going to

200:44

build a fab. So, but but we're going to

200:47

see a very significant cash flow from

200:50

Robo Taxis, it's going to be an

200:52

incredible cash flow. It's kind of cash

200:54

flow we haven't seen from auto company.

200:57

So, I think I think from a time

201:00

perspective

201:02

with a means of planning it, I think

201:04

they just communicated it really poorly.

201:08

I'll I'll I'll sign off now and just

201:11

listen. Thank you, Larry. Appreciate you

201:13

uh dialing in while you're traveling.

201:14

Appreciate it.

201:15

>> Travel safe, Larry.

201:16

>> And and I think one other one other

201:18

point that we haven't really discussed

201:20

yet is that the limiting factor is not

201:23

batteries anymore. It's chips and that

201:25

Tesla just feels obligated to

201:30

do it themselves as they did for

201:32

lithium, as they're doing for refinery,

201:33

obviously they're doing for so many

201:34

other things. Um and I think we can very

201:39

confidently now predict that there is

201:42

going to be a chips factory.

201:45

>> Yeah,

201:47

this is going to be far just this is

201:49

going to be far more difficult I think

201:51

to pull off than their efforts in

201:55

battery manufacturing. I'm not saying

201:56

they can't do it. It's just when I'm

201:58

handicapping these things and like it's

202:01

one of those things where I agree with

202:02

the strategy like you have to do this if

202:04

you feel you're going to be constrained

202:06

there something you have to do. It's

202:08

more of I think it's going to be a great

202:10

negotiating tactic with other companies

202:13

of like look I'm going to start making

202:14

my own stuff or if I can get a great

202:16

deal from you and in confirmed supply

202:18

can I be the front of the line I I'd

202:20

rather buy it from you. So I think this

202:22

is an interesting this is a good thing

202:24

for Tesla I think overall but but

202:27

handicapping the success and like

202:29

pinning a date and getting this terapab

202:31

to real capacity it's a I think it's a

202:34

far more difficult effort quite frankly

202:36

than uh than battery manufacturing

202:38

although Tesla's gone after some

202:40

advanced tech in battery manufacturing

202:42

but I'm just I go back to the capex so

202:44

we're hundred billion dollar a year

202:46

revenue company and now we're going to

202:48

double capex so when are we going to be

202:50

a $200 billion revenue company? When are

202:52

we going to be a $300 billion revenue

202:54

company? And I think they could have

202:57

laid out a couple of things and saying,

202:58

"Hey, look, this is forward-looking, but

203:00

this is this is how we're thinking about

203:01

it. We know we need to make these

203:02

investments because of X, Y, and Z." But

203:05

it really just like left everything to

203:08

like

203:09

almost as like you we're doing all these

203:11

things and things are going to be

203:12

ramping up and going, but there wasn't

203:15

like this is what we think is going to

203:16

happen with the economics of the company

203:18

as a result of these investments. So

203:21

anyway, if you're going to go out, if

203:22

you're going to go there and talk

203:24

through that, I think I think it would

203:26

be good for them to spell that out a

203:29

little bit better. Um, put a window

203:31

around it, but anyway,

203:34

>> and just to add to that real quick,

203:35

briefly, I don't think people are

203:38

missing everything you guys are talking

203:39

about. I know we've said that like all

203:41

these like nuggets or whatever the

203:42

vision people get that but without the

203:45

context of what Jeff is talking about it

203:48

is a moving target that you never get to

203:50

or that analysts and investors or

203:52

institutional investors can't really do

203:55

anything with. They can't sink their

203:56

teeth into. So it just becomes once

203:58

again the boy who cried wolf who Elon

204:01

himself has said that he doesn't want to

204:03

do that anymore. But it's the ever

204:05

moving of the goalpost. So, I I think

204:08

that's the problem. Everyone believes

204:10

that they're going to get there one day,

204:11

but when is that day and when does it

204:13

start?

204:17

>> Here's someone that says, "Not sure Jeff

204:19

understands how Tesla does business and

204:22

is probably too conservative to be a

204:23

Tesla investor."

204:27

>> Thank you. See you later, Jeff.

204:29

>> 14th year investing.

204:31

>> This is new to me. You're right. Um, but

204:33

like the way that CERN I think CERN

204:36

really framed up the SX to Optimus

204:38

transition in one sentence and it's

204:41

impactful and then you kind of like

204:43

agreed

204:43

>> you move on. Um, but anyway, I still

204:46

think this company has the most exciting

204:48

portfolio in the business. It's more of

204:50

like all right, what are we saying on

204:52

these calls now? it to me I left the

204:54

call with okay gross margins are going

204:56

in the right direction

204:57

>> now for cars

205:00

>> and and for autonomy with cars energy

205:02

they said is going to be under is it

205:04

going to be under stress which I I I

205:06

think I understand why that would be the

205:09

case but gross margins overall moving in

205:11

the right direction we're going to

205:13

invest more and we're going to be you

205:15

know doubling our output on autonomy so

205:18

would have I I would have liked a

205:20

definitive statement on

205:22

on on autonomy and these near-term

205:24

milestones. Are we in terms of like are

205:26

we g like what's the what's the

205:29

confidence on getting to these first

205:30

half milestones? Uh but you know we we

205:34

got what we got and if we do really

205:35

start we really start seeing uh doubling

205:38

in February and March I mean that that

205:41

is it. I mean that's we're off to the

205:44

races. You don't have to wait till the

205:45

end of the quarter that starts

205:46

happening.

205:48

I mean I heard a lot of confidence in

205:50

FSD robo taxi roll out uh

205:53

infrastructure. The reason we were doing

205:54

it was mostly for infrastructure and

205:56

being doubly cautious. Uh we've learned

205:59

a lot from a large scale. We have the

206:01

numbers and metrics to to make that

206:03

decision.

206:05

I didn't hear anything that concerned me

206:06

about robo taxi rollout which is the

206:08

most important thing. And then the

206:10

confidence they have that cyber cabs

206:11

will be used for autonomous driving. I

206:15

don't know. Each of them said it some

206:16

way or the other. Not just Elon, not

206:18

just Lars, not just Ashok, even Avib.

206:22

They have all said some statement that

206:23

was referring to we're moving to a

206:26

transportation service

206:28

and we're now going to stop making cars.

206:30

We're going to turn the Cybertruck into

206:32

autonomous. We're going to turn the SNX

206:34

into a robbo robot company. Uh factory

206:37

pilot lines.

206:39

I mean, that's that's all good news.

206:40

That's that's the most important thing

206:42

to focus on.

206:45

I find it interesting. You know,

206:47

historically, Wall Street loves stock

206:49

buybacks. They love capital-l like

206:51

companies. They tend to freak out when

206:54

companies invest in capex,

206:57

right? Because they want they want free

206:58

cash flow.

207:00

But if you look at what's happening in

207:02

the world with AI, obviously

207:05

a leader in AI is going to have to

207:07

spend. And that's what we're seeing

207:08

right now is a spending race amongst the

207:10

hyperscalers. Just to put this in

207:12

perspective, if if Tesla does 20 billion

207:14

in capex next year, so call it 5 billion

207:17

a quarter.

207:19

When was Microsoft spending 5 billion a

207:22

quarter in capex? Last quarter they did

207:24

19 billion in Q3 of 2025. They first hit

207:29

5 billion in Q1 of 2021.

207:32

Not that long ago. When did Amazon start

207:35

spending 5 billion a quarter,

207:38

right? It wasn't that long ago either.

207:39

It was fourth quarter of 2019. They hit

207:42

5 billion. What did Amazon spend last

207:45

quarter? 35 billion in one quarter. When

207:48

did Google hit 5 billion in quarterly

207:51

capex? Okay. It was um all the way back

207:55

in 2018, second quarter of 2018

207:59

or actually sorry, first quarter they

208:01

jumped up to 7 billion in the first

208:02

quarter of 2018. Now they're doing about

208:04

24 billion a quarter in capex.

208:08

All of these companies are increasing

208:09

their capex over time. As investors, you

208:11

want them to. Okay. One of the

208:14

criticisms these days about Apple is

208:16

they're not spending. They're where's

208:17

the innovation? Where where's the next

208:19

product going to come from? We want

208:21

Tesla to spend massively on capex. And

208:24

so if they spend 5 billion per quarter

208:26

next year, we want that to get to 10 and

208:28

eventually to 20 billion a quarter, just

208:31

like all the other major tech companies.

208:33

Now Tesla obviously is going to get way

208:36

more for their money than everybody

208:37

else. they already have. That's clear,

208:39

right? And the show that Herbert and I

208:41

did last week on that, I think makes

208:42

that really clear.

208:45

So, it I I just find it interesting that

208:47

Wall Street's kind of freaking out about

208:48

the capex spend. To me, it's nothing but

208:50

a positive. Now, to Jeff's point, it

208:52

would be nice if perhaps they gave us

208:54

some guidance in terms of the revenue

208:55

that comes along with that,

208:57

right? But all Wall Street has to do is

209:00

is put some models together and they'll

209:01

they'll see. The timing obviously is

209:04

still a little bit uncertain with

209:05

respect to robo taxi. Now, I guess they

209:09

gave us the clearest guidance they have

209:10

yet in terms of doubling the fleet every

209:12

month. As Jeff said, that's something we

209:15

can hang our head on. I I take that from

209:18

Elon still with a little bit of grain of

209:20

salt because he's he's made other

209:22

statements before about we're we're

209:23

going to be in 50% of the city, you

209:26

know, 50% of the US population by the

209:28

end of 2025.

209:30

That didn't happen. I think now he said

209:33

that's the case for 2026.

209:36

He said I think he said 25 to 50% of the

209:38

US population this year.

209:41

So the goalposts are moving a little

209:43

bit.

209:44

>> But when you're developing technology

209:46

that's never been seen before, you have

209:49

to expect some movement of the

209:50

goalposts.

209:52

>> Yeah.

209:53

>> Um

209:54

>> can I add one here? Can I add one here?

209:57

uh because we also should talk about

209:58

things that will in the very short term

210:00

have negative effects. So on February

210:04

14th, they're going to stop selling FSD.

210:07

There will probably be a surge up to the

210:09

the next two weeks for people still

210:10

purchasing FSD, but then it will move to

210:14

a subscription model. So by pure

210:16

mathematics of you know being able to

210:19

sell at 8,000 bucks which increases

210:22

substantially the car margin um FSD to

210:27

now going to a model where people pay 99

210:30

maybe later on more per month will have

210:33

a direct impact an immediate impact

210:35

second half of February on car average

210:39

selling prices and uh cash flow. So, I

210:44

think, you know, we should be aware of

210:46

that probably smoothing out a couple of

210:48

of months later, but we'll see it. We'll

210:51

see it in in the margin because 8,000

210:53

bucks on an average car of how much is

210:55

the average now? 28 30 35 I don't I I

210:58

didn't I felt 20%. Right. So, um they

211:03

they will fall to the side.

211:06

>> Did did you guys hear did he say um that

211:09

1.1 million FSE is that 70% Yes, 70% of

211:14

those of the current 1.1 million, 70% of

211:17

those were upfront purchases. So, they

211:19

were obviously at different prices. They

211:21

were obviously at different prices

211:23

between I I think it started at three.

211:25

The highest it was 15, now it's eight.

211:28

>> And that's going to last and that's part

211:30

of the seven 70 instead of 17.

211:33

>> No, no, no. 70.

211:35

>> That's what I thought I heard.

211:36

>> So, that's 70,000 purchased FSD.

211:40

>> Wow. And that's exactly I what I said

211:42

was why they're killing the $8,000 sub

211:46

because you're not going to get to 10

211:47

million charging AK up front.

211:50

>> It's simple mathematics. That's why the

211:52

whole but report was written differently

211:55

showing that and especially when you

211:56

consider only 330,000 are doing the $100

212:00

a month. It's actually very low.

212:02

>> Yeah. But

212:03

>> yeah, I

212:04

>> Yeah,

212:05

>> that's a little concerning to not

212:06

concerning, that's the wrong word, but

212:08

like there needs to they need to do

212:09

something about that. Because obviously

212:11

the people who can afford it are buying

212:13

it outright. Like I bought it outright.

212:14

I'm sure all you guys bought outright,

212:16

>> but clearly the people that we really

212:18

need for scale.

212:20

>> Yeah.

212:21

>> They're the ones that aren't paying it

212:22

paying $100 a month.

212:24

>> And and Nick as well, uh there is an

212:26

education issue.

212:27

>> 99% of the humanoids, humans don't even

212:30

know what it is. So, and they haven't

212:33

pushed it because they weren't maybe

212:36

confident enough in it. I think that

212:38

will all change in 2026.

212:42

>> So I think yeah Jeeoff you are right. Uh

212:44

there I don't I found the deck to be

212:46

very light on any forward um guidance.

212:51

Usually they would say we're going to

212:52

plan to double vehicle production next

212:54

year something like that. very few just

212:57

generic comments except for the $20

212:58

billion in spend in R&D and then during

213:01

this call as well very few except for

213:04

maybe we expect to go into 10 plus

213:07

cities or whatever numbers he said other

213:10

than that yeah very few guidance of

213:13

volumes numbers expectations

213:17

>> I mean there's a guidance for for cities

213:20

in robo taxi so like

213:22

>> give some credit there

213:24

>> yeah and there's the projection on miles

213:27

like we could definitely it could have

213:29

been like hey we're going to be

213:30

increasing capex spend you know as we go

213:33

into these other ventures and they could

213:34

have probably left it if you're not

213:36

going to pair it up with this is what we

213:38

think is going to happen in terms of

213:41

utilizing the capac we're putting this

213:42

capacity in the factory this is how

213:44

we're going to utilize it uh this is

213:46

what we think how revenue expansion may

213:48

play out

213:50

then it becomes a tougher conversation

213:52

so why put the exact capex number out

213:54

and not put anything around uh what

213:57

you're doing with it. But um I I still I

214:01

go back to the portfolio and what

214:04

they're building and and to I love

214:06

adding solar. I love the I love these

214:08

things. They are so on point given where

214:11

things are are going. It's just more of

214:14

like painting around like okay what does

214:15

this mean now for the earnings of the

214:18

company? And then really this 38 12%

214:21

growth in FSD,

214:23

what was the driver? What do you think

214:25

that that would be throughout the rest

214:27

of this year? Uh because man, if you've

214:30

driven this latest FSD 14 2224, like the

214:35

nag is almost gone. Like this thing is

214:38

is really an unbelievable experience.

214:42

Um, also I would have been interested to

214:44

know how if if FSD is a a driver and

214:47

robo taxis are a driver, like how are we

214:48

just going to get more butts and seats

214:50

in any commentary uh on that I think

214:53

would have been helpful. The earnings

214:55

deck uh the content in the earnings deck

214:58

I I found it to be very useful.

215:00

>> Yeah, this is the best earnings deck

215:02

they've ever created in my opinion.

215:04

>> It was like a it was like a great

215:06

script. It was like a great um main

215:11

Yeah. Um, it it was it was very very

215:15

well done.

215:16

>> There there's one other little nugget

215:18

that we didn't mention, but the robo

215:20

taxi tracker says the fleet's 241. Elon

215:25

said it's 500 across Austin and the Bay

215:27

Area. I think that's big.

215:31

>> Do you believe 500?

215:35

>> Yeah.

215:35

>> I believe if the CEO says

215:40

>> Yeah. Yeah. And Ashoke uh confirmed it

215:43

too when he said that

215:44

>> during peak times.

215:45

>> So they're already at 20% of the scale

215:48

of Whimo and Whimo is worth $15 billion,

215:52

but Whimo will never make a dollar

215:54

profit in their entire future. So I

215:56

think that's very interesting. I uh

215:59

something controversial to say. I think

216:00

Whimo will get a pin stuck in it in the

216:02

next three years. Who agrees?

216:05

>> Oh yeah. I've been saying that for a

216:06

while. It's

216:07

>> Yeah,

216:08

>> I agree. Yeah,

216:09

>> it was interesting for me. Elon said a

216:11

couple of times that a couple of things

216:13

are underestimated. One is solar and

216:15

what Tesla's going to do there.

216:17

>> Yeah.

216:18

>> Right. Um and the second thing was robo

216:20

taxi as it relates to customer being

216:23

able to put their own vehicles in the

216:24

fleet.

216:26

>> He made the point there's been a lot of

216:28

chatter on X lately about oh that'll

216:30

never happen. You know liability is too

216:32

great blah blah blah. You can't clean

216:34

the cars. You can't verify them. You

216:35

can't do this and that. And Elon again

216:37

made a point to say, "No, we're this is

216:39

a key part of our plan."

216:42

>> Yeah. And I mean, honestly, if you own

216:44

the Tesla, I lease it, so I don't I'm

216:46

not part of this and I can't talk for

216:48

myself, but if you own a Tesla and

216:49

haven't bought FSD, you have two weeks

216:51

left and that will be it. And uh so if

216:54

you believe in this, if you see the

216:56

technology and if you believe in this,

216:58

you had your confirmation that this will

217:00

be worthwhile.

217:02

But my question is, do I go out and buy

217:04

an X now or what do I do? Like that was

217:06

>> collector's car.

217:08

>> It's a collector.

217:08

>> You know, I actually felt I actually

217:10

felt that Elon was sad to let them go,

217:12

you know, because I mean, think about,

217:13

you know, how much S. Exactly. And then

217:16

the X for a family car. And you you felt

217:19

him. I I had an X. I loved it. But

217:22

honestly, the new Y I feel is as good

217:25

for half the price. So there is no

217:27

comparison. you know how much better the

217:30

Y is in value for money.

217:32

>> The new X is really good.

217:33

>> Yeah. And I I have an X now for a long

217:36

time. It's never given me a problem, so

217:37

I can't ever part with it. And now I

217:39

won't. So it's just, you know, if

217:42

anybody has one and the second and

217:44

values are probably low after six or

217:46

seven years, it's worth holding on to

217:48

just for the gullwing doors itself.

217:50

>> And and I I want to end because I have

217:53

to then go get off, but I want to end my

217:55

contribution here. I didn't hear

217:58

by far as much criticizable things as

218:00

Jeff and other people did. I found this

218:02

was first of all I was delighted that

218:05

Waybuff was very clear because I've been

218:07

you know complaining about this for a

218:09

long time and I really love how he laid

218:12

it out. He laid it out twice. It was

218:14

clearly understandable and I think in

218:17

earnings calls I hear you about

218:19

presentations and all the rest but it's

218:21

what the CFO says that is really

218:23

crucial. It's because those are, you

218:25

know, he's prepared to interpret the

218:27

past numbers and and give guidance

218:29

forward to the to the next ones. And he

218:30

was actually the most precise in in the

218:32

whole earnings call. All the others were

218:34

more on the theories and on the on on

218:36

the plans, but he was really very

218:38

precise. And I loved how good he was.

218:40

Um, and I think it was also very clear

218:42

how committed they are to the solar cell

218:46

fabs and uh and to the the chips fab and

218:50

and and actually the terab. Yeah. And uh

218:52

Bloomberg just did a huge article on it

218:55

because that seems to shock the market.

218:59

I mean, it doesn't shock us. We heard

219:00

him in November talk about it at the at

219:02

the earnings call, but it also seems to

219:05

now be decided, right? It's done. This

219:07

is the next goal. That's what we're

219:09

planning for in terms of finances, not

219:10

2026, but it has to be done within three

219:12

to four years because if not, we're

219:15

running into a shortage. and uh and

219:18

those solar cells are going to be sold

219:19

to SpaceX and going to go up there and

219:22

uh and have our data centers working the

219:25

way we want them to. So I I was you know

219:28

on in big plans and on current numbers I

219:31

was very satisfied by with uh with this

219:33

call.

219:35

>> Good. Thank you everybody. Thank you

219:36

Alexandra. First power panel guys this

219:39

was a great I appreciate everybody

219:40

spending time to give us their insights.

219:43

Great call as well um as usual. So, we

219:45

got Nick Gibbs, we got James from Invest

219:47

Answers, you got CERN, you got Jeff, you

219:49

got Alexander, and we had uh Larry here

219:52

as well. Thanks everybody. We'll see you

219:53

in the next one.

219:54

>> Thanks for everyone. Pleasure.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.