TRANSCRIPTEnglish

You Didn't Listen: The Stock Market is about to Plummet -- WARNING.

22m 45s4,483 words629 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

holy smokes 69 off flash sale going on

0:03

now through Valentine's Day dang may as

0:05

well take advantage of that because that

0:07

is a deal link down below and remember

0:09

that's a flash sale that's an investment

0:11

in yourself for programs on building

0:14

your wealth and since these programs are

0:16

an educational expense and tax season is

0:18

coming up remember these programs could

0:20

be a perfect tax deduction for you check

0:22

with your CPA but investing in yourself

0:24

or your business could be the perfect

0:27

tax deduction for you take advantage of

0:29

that 69 off flash sale before it's gone

0:31

are we gonna give some Credence to the

0:34

Bears and of course every time I give

0:36

the Bears some credit and show reports

0:39

from the Bears like what we're going to

0:40

talk about here whether it's Mike Wilson

0:42

from Morgan Stanley guess what position

0:44

he's thinking he's a bear man we're

0:47

gonna go look at what Bloomberg

0:49

economists are forecasting we're gonna

0:50

look at some of their models we'll look

0:52

at transitory Goldilocks and we'll look

0:54

at the vibe session we'll have a lot to

0:56

talk about but I have to first disclaim

0:58

any time I may make a bearish video

1:01

there are losers that of course we're

1:04

not going to mention by name but there

1:06

are these losers who like to take

1:08

screenshots of my channel and they're

1:11

like look at Kevin one day he's British

1:14

one day he's bearish and it's like

1:17

you're just another idiot who doesn't

1:19

watch to the end of the video so and

1:21

honestly not even through the end of the

1:22

video I mean I'm on honestly when I

1:24

cover the bearish stuff I'm like look

1:26

I'm covering this but obviously I'm a

1:28

bull and here's my take on it right like

1:30

it's like it's like I I don't know I

1:33

think sometimes people are just like

1:35

miserable in their own lives and they

1:36

have to find a reason to hate on someone

1:38

it's like I think I've been pretty damn

1:40

consistent about my my Nike Swoosh

1:42

thesis right I I don't want to make that

1:44

clear up front okay you don't even have

1:46

to make it to the end of the video I

1:47

think I'm very clear uh that while we

1:49

had that v-shaped recovery and by the

1:51

dip was great in in the covet pandemic

1:53

this is a probably an elongated Nike

1:56

Swoosh we're gonna have a lot of ups and

1:58

downs and plenty of by the dip

1:59

opportunity communities and no massive

2:01

Panic rush to to be all in uh you know I

2:04

I've been saying for a bit you know I

2:06

don't think 10 to 15 cash on the

2:08

sidelines and no margin is is a bad idea

2:10

uh you know so those are my takes but I

2:16

I don't know those are those are the

2:17

same people who who try to allege things

2:19

like oh well Kevin was selling while he

2:21

was telling you to buy that never

2:24

happened I like if I tell you I'm buying

2:26

that's what I'm doing I would never do

2:28

that first of all I'd get in trouble by

2:29

the FCC I'm SEC regulated folks okay

2:32

that would be terrible uh now I might

2:34

change my mind very quickly like I did

2:36

in January of 2020 and I get that like

2:38

in fairness it went fast okay it went

2:40

from me buying like January 18th to like

2:43

January 21st oh [ __ ]

2:46

like I finally put the pieces of the

2:48

puzzle together right uh which ended up

2:50

being the right call to flip right thank

2:52

God but uh but anyway so uh let's talk

2:55

about some of the the drama we've got

2:57

here so Bloomberg economics suggesting

3:00

that Powell's preferred recession

3:02

indicator skyrocketed in January now

3:05

from a bearish point of view that means

3:06

oh crap we're going into recession from

3:08

a bullish point of view that means hell

3:10

yeah Jerome Powell's preferred measure

3:12

went dirty that means he's gonna spank

3:15

us less hard

3:17

uh anyway so then you've got uh the the

3:20

indicators so what they are basically is

3:23

you have three potential yield curves to

3:26

look at you have the twos and tens which

3:28

is the two year ten year you've got the

3:29

three and ten which is the not the three

3:31

year okay it's the three month ten year

3:34

uh and then you have the three month 18

3:38

month yield Curve Model and Powell's

3:41

preferred is the three month 18 month

3:44

model I'll throw that up on screen right

3:46

here and I'll keep myself off of it so

3:48

you can actually see it so I'm not

3:49

blocking it so and this this chart is

3:52

honestly a garbage chart uh someone sent

3:54

this to me and I'm like dude this is

3:55

such a complicated looking chart but

3:58

anyway on the far right you can

4:00

basically see Powell's line goes up okay

4:02

it's the deepest inverted yield curve

4:04

we've seen with the Powell preferred

4:06

indicator which suggests recession

4:07

coming right the two is ten is pretty

4:10

high the 310 obviously pretty inverted

4:12

as well but nowhere near as bad as as

4:14

Powell's as powie good old powie then

4:16

you've got the Bloomberg economics

4:19

12-month recession model and it's

4:22

basically at a hundred percent which the

4:24

last time it was at 100 was in 2019

4:26

which obviously then we got the coveted

4:28

pandemic it was at a hundred percent in

4:30

2006 and seven which obviously we got

4:32

the Great Recession uh it was at a

4:34

hundred percent in the.com Era which

4:36

obviously we that that all com bubble

4:38

but we did have a false indicator in

4:40

1998 where you actually had uh the

4:44

indicators suggest uh we had a hundred

4:46

percent probability of going into a

4:48

recession within the next 12 months and

4:50

it was actually wrong we didn't end up

4:52

going into a recession within the next

4:54

12 months we ended up going into nothing

4:56

we were we were fine in 1999 and it

4:59

really wasn't until a year later in 20

5:01

2000 in 2000 that we started seeing uh

5:05

oh it looks like we might be heading

5:06

into a recession and then sure enough we

5:08

did uh by uh like 2000 uh 2001 2003 uh

5:13

obviously recessionary era so it shows

5:15

you that these these indicator there's

5:18

are not perfect right they have false

5:21

starts and that's okay and that's to be

5:23

expected that these indicators have

5:25

false starts but I think one of the

5:26

things that we also have to be very

5:28

clear about when we look at these models

5:30

is that they're not necessarily telling

5:34

us we're going to hell right like think

5:36

think about that for a moment in fact

5:37

one of my by the way and this is sort of

5:39

a tangent one of my favorite Warren

5:40

Buffett quotes is tell them to go to

5:41

hell tomorrow uh very good tool by the

5:44

way for uh if you're ever in business uh

5:47

tell them to go to hell tomorrow like

5:49

relax your expectations but uh anyway

5:52

this uh the idea uh that oh we're

5:55

definitely going to hit a recession okay

5:57

fine so the models say we're definitely

5:59

going to hit a recession how bad is the

6:01

recession going to be oh well I don't

6:03

know well sure the models don't really

6:05

tell you how bad it's going to be now

6:07

you can try to suggest when or or how

6:10

bad the models are going to be and the

6:12

way you do that is you kind of look at

6:13

okay well if uh if we're going to see a

6:17

recession uh how much is the Federal

6:20

Reserve going to have to cut and if you

6:22

line that up on the charts right now the

6:24

fed's looking at potentially cutting in

6:26

the event of recession by 5.25 percent

6:29

because that's how deep the inverted

6:31

yield curve is and if you stack that up

6:32

with a linear regression model to what's

6:34

historically happened that's what you

6:36

get you get you know basically 525 basis

6:39

points worth of cuts which is wild but

6:41

maybe that's exactly what we end up

6:43

getting over the next few years so it

6:44

could end up playing out but it could

6:45

also be that the recession we see is

6:47

like oh no we're down point one percent

6:50

in GDP like okay that's pretty benign

6:54

right and that's actually what some of

6:56

the high frequency signals are showing

6:57

us as well uh this is sort of like some

6:59

of the the uh mortgage pre-approvals

7:02

you're actually seeing an increase

7:03

suggesting okay maybe people are still

7:05

resilient to buy which is really

7:07

fascinating you're seeing uh sure

7:08

manufacturing and Industrial is losing

7:10

steam but you're seeing Services

7:12

consumption still pretty dang resilient

7:15

you look at the cruise lines you look at

7:17

the airlines like people are still

7:18

spending you've got American Express

7:20

saying people are spending through the

7:22

recession or whatever it may be consumer

7:25

demand generally stable I like this one

7:27

bookings at open table as of January are

7:31

actually up at the start of 2023 now

7:34

it's possible that if they're comparing

7:37

to 2022 you had you have to remember you

7:40

had Omicron in 2022 and nobody was going

7:43

out to restaurants in 2022 that was

7:45

pretty crazy uh but uh then you've got

7:48

uh you know consumers still traveling

7:50

that's a big deal uh the beige book

7:53

shows the same thing it's not just

7:54

earnings but it's the Federal Reserves

7:55

beige books showing that consumers are

7:57

still traveling and yeah you've got

7:59

leveling off of of job listings and

8:01

potentially job openings but the jolt

8:03

suggested job openings actually opened

8:05

indeed.com is telling us they're

8:07

leveling off but joltz is saying oh

8:09

they're still going up at the same time

8:11

as you you've got uh you know more of

8:13

this consumer travel demand you actually

8:15

have the number of oil rigs down own 4.5

8:18

percent since December at the same time

8:20

as the Chinese reopening potentially

8:21

pushing oil demand up and you've got a

8:24

lot of pessimisms that pessimism levels

8:27

at households like consumer and business

8:29

sentiment is pretty a pretty poor uh the

8:32

gap between where consumers feel right

8:34

now and what they expect for the future

8:36

is huge it's the largest that we've seen

8:39

since the 2008 recession and then of

8:41

course you got people like well Morgan

8:43

Stanley's Mike Wilson basically saying

8:45

look all of this combined is going to

8:48

turn into a very ugly earnings season

8:51

he's of course our staunch bear he says

8:54

look sure we're seeing rates go higher

8:56

but the Market's just not pricing in

8:58

what higher for longer actually means

9:00

and what's going to happen is when those

9:03

bad earnings come in markets are going

9:05

to sell off and you're going to see

9:07

broad declines on the indices because

9:10

right now Morgan Stanley's Mike Wilson

9:11

says look prices are just straight up

9:13

disconnected from reality and maybe

9:16

tomorrow's Pi report will end up being a

9:19

reality check he calls it of course this

9:22

is also leading to a lot of calls that

9:24

hey we're going to end up going higher

9:26

for longer and by going higher for

9:28

longer the Market's basically not

9:30

pricing in that EPS is going to get

9:32

screwed now that's That's Mike Wilson

9:35

he's the bear at Morgan Stanley

9:36

interestingly though not everyone at

9:39

Morgan Stanley actually agrees with uh

9:42

Mike Wilson so what do you have over

9:43

here uh the no Landing let's talk about

9:47

that right after I mention that I need

9:50

to take a sip of coffee bet you weren't

9:52

expecting that one

9:54

um

9:55

thank you all right so what do we have

9:57

over here before we look at that take a

9:59

look on screen here we've got the

10:01

largest flash sale on a percentage basis

10:04

that we've ever had 69 for any of the

10:07

programs on building your wealth and

10:09

this includes the stocks course real

10:11

estate courses income courses and even

10:13

the shadowing experience which is really

10:16

incredible now which one's right for you

10:18

well I'll tell you this most people get

10:19

started with either the stocks and

10:22

psychology of money group or the zero to

10:23

millionaire real estate investing course

10:25

in fact a lot of people use these flash

10:27

sales to bundle up between the uh both

10:30

of these programs this is how you're

10:31

getting great pricing on both of these

10:33

together now the stocks and psych group

10:35

is coming with a new trading challenge

10:37

where my team and I work together to

10:40

take all of the research that we do and

10:42

then think of what we think as the best

10:45

and most likely to succeed trades and so

10:48

we'll be posting those regularly for

10:50

those of you in the stocks on psychology

10:51

money group starting this week which is

10:53

very exciting you also get updates and

10:55

insights into my personal moves and my

10:57

selling Tesla have I sold Tesla what am

10:59

I buying you get that trading Intel

11:01

fundamental analysis short-term

11:03

long-term trades real estate you get if

11:06

you look if you're looking for your

11:06

first house your first rental property

11:08

you want to use a property manager zero

11:10

to millionaire real estate this is how

11:11

you get the best wedge deals my opinion

11:13

a lot of knowledge in this course you

11:16

want to go into managing properties

11:17

yourself you don't just get me you get

11:19

professional property managers

11:20

interviewed in this course as well some

11:23

incredible insights to make sure you

11:24

don't get ruined by tenants you want to

11:26

grow your income as a real estate agent

11:28

as a social media content creator or you

11:31

want to grow your income as an employee

11:32

or other self-employed person check out

11:34

the elite Hustlers group remember a lot

11:36

of these programs are tax deductible

11:37

check with your CPA you can also Shadow

11:40

me now I don't sell Transportation

11:42

remember that you're not paying for

11:43

transportation so if you want to come

11:45

Shadow you've got to pay to get yourself

11:47

out here obviously if I go drive

11:48

somewhere you can come with me it's

11:50

incidental to what you're paying for

11:51

you're paying to Shadow me right you're

11:53

not paying for transportation if we go

11:54

go fly somewhere then that would be

11:56

included as well now I want to be very

11:59

clear you're paying to Shadow me that's

12:01

it should be very obvious anyway with

12:03

these programs though you get lifetime

12:04

access to all of the new content that's

12:06

added to them as well but hopefully

12:08

you've appreciated this breakdown and

12:09

take advantage of that 69 off flash sale

12:12

through Valentine's from the desk of the

12:15

chief Economist of Morgan Stanley in the

12:19

year ahead Outlook we present our

12:21

expectation for a soft planning this

12:23

year with a forecast of just 0.3 percent

12:25

real GDP on a Q4 basis we hardly call

12:29

for a stellar growth but four saw a

12:32

positive outcome nonetheless we stood

12:35

well beyond the more pessimistic

12:37

consensus at the time economists and

12:39

markets have moved in our Direction well

12:42

except for Mike Wilson

12:44

uh but basically they're they're saying

12:46

look our conversations suggests the

12:49

phrase isn't clearly defined it tends to

12:51

gloss over policy implications but seems

12:54

to most closely resemble a soft Landing

12:57

in English Morgan Stanley other than

13:00

Mike Wilson think we can get a soft

13:02

Landing which is really interesting

13:03

because Morgan Stanley is kind of

13:04

playing both sides here it's kind of

13:06

like oh we're Bulls but we also have a

13:07

bear at our company so like if the bear

13:11

ends up being right we could put him on

13:13

a pedestal and if our chief Economist

13:15

ends up being right we could put him on

13:16

a pedestal kind of interesting I don't

13:18

have that luxury because I think I'm

13:20

very transparent and I'm very like clear

13:23

about my position I can't play Both

13:26

Sides unless of course you only read the

13:28

titles but if you only read the titles

13:29

you're a [ __ ] I I think the true people

13:32

who are here to learn watch the videos

13:34

and they watch the majority of the

13:36

videos uh and through them and I

13:38

hopefully you pick up a lot of info and

13:40

value that's my goal right provide more

13:42

value and whatever business you're in if

13:44

you want to make more money remember the

13:46

number one rule of thumb is provide more

13:48

value do not be a yomi ayomi is the kind

13:50

of person that's like well you you owe

13:52

me more pain maybe if you pay me more

13:54

money I'll work harder uh no you're

13:56

fired if you're a yomi you're an idiot

13:58

anyway and that's not how capitalism

14:00

Works work hard then you shall receive

14:03

the harder you work the luckier you get

14:06

hard Landing scenario so they suggest

14:08

that a hard land ending is basically

14:10

anything with less than zero percent GDP

14:12

now I think that's really interesting

14:14

they're basically saying anything hard

14:16

is a recession

14:19

anything and that they also call this

14:21

potentially the FED over tightening

14:23

anything soft they actually I think is

14:27

just slow GDP growth right below GDP

14:30

Trend growth which would be zero to one

14:32

point five percent uh Trend growth uh

14:34

resilient growth they think is this no

14:37

Landing scenario where the plane just

14:39

doesn't come in for the landing right

14:40

and what is the uh no Landing scenario

14:43

well the no Landing scenario is the

14:46

economy doesn't slow down but inflation

14:47

goes back to Target this is a version of

14:50

the world where a potential is simply

14:52

higher than anyone thought I include

14:54

this scenario however it's unlikely that

14:57

it plays out this year but they're

14:58

including it to cover a full range of

15:00

possibilities so this is really

15:01

interesting so the Morgan Stanley is

15:02

basically saying look we're not going to

15:04

get a like a no Landing scenario where

15:06

we're a recession or GDP growth is over

15:09

1.5 I mean I kind of agree and I don't

15:11

think

15:12

that the economy is going to grow at

15:13

more than 1.5 percent I I my base case

15:16

is the soft Landing right or like is is

15:18

that basically we're just hitting even

15:20

if we have no growth it's still not

15:22

necessarily going to be a recession or

15:24

if it's a recession it's gonna be like

15:25

0.1 like it's gonna be the most benign

15:27

recession ever uh I really don't see

15:29

this as like an 08 we don't have the

15:31

massive structural disasters that we

15:33

have and and it's still possible even

15:35

though the word is really disgusting it

15:38

is still possible that inflation could

15:40

prove to be transitory and that's what

15:42

I'm seeing in sort of leading indicators

15:44

from earning calls from earnings calls

15:46

from companies now that doesn't mean we

15:48

won't have a bad CPI read tomorrow

15:50

that's sort of a very short-term uh

15:53

Outlook uh but but for the next year I

15:55

think the trend is very clear down

15:58

uh so uh balance of the data coming out

16:00

is starting to be mixed uh GDP and

16:03

Manufacturing data so far are lining up

16:05

with potentially flat growth uh flat GDP

16:08

growth for the year which I I don't

16:10

think flat GDP growth is really flat I

16:12

think it means no growth it means zero

16:14

uh consumer or a rather uh conference

16:17

boards leading economic indicators Lei

16:20

uh suggesting definitely a recession

16:22

within the next 12 months that's very

16:24

similar to what Bloomberg says but then

16:25

again it's like like okay well how bad

16:27

is it going to be you know is this just

16:29

statistical noise Morgan Stanley talks

16:32

about these indicators potentially just

16:34

being noise it's like okay well sure

16:36

we've got a really inverted yield curve

16:37

but how bad is it going to be now this

16:39

was interesting because Credit Suisse

16:41

actually started talking about PP

16:43

uh they talk about this idea that even

16:47

without a full blown recession we can

16:49

expect corporate earnings to suffer this

16:51

is the Mike Wilson argument right but

16:52

this is at Credit Suisse as much as you

16:54

can trust them for what it's worth but

16:56

anyway they think that earnings will

16:57

fall significantly below current

16:59

consensus expectations they think that

17:01

waning growth waning here it is pricing

17:04

power and increased interest rates

17:07

provide an unfavorable mix of factors I

17:10

actually agree with this I think broadly

17:11

many of the companies in our indices

17:13

especially the S P 500 are going to see

17:15

pricing power evaporate and that's

17:17

mostly because companies are going to

17:19

either have to cut prices or keep prices

17:21

stable in the face of still Embers of

17:24

inflation which basically means Rising

17:26

costs which means that these companies

17:28

take it in the uh in the margin

17:30

basically so their margin absorbs some

17:33

of the pain uh and and that is generally

17:36

aligned with a lack of pricing power now

17:39

don't get me wrong I think every company

17:41

is going to lack pricing power relative

17:43

to 2021 no company is going to have the

17:46

same PP they had in 2021. you know they

17:48

all got a little bit older their PP just

17:50

doesn't function as well anymore now

17:52

that they're all a little bit older but

17:54

there are still some PPS that are bigger

17:56

and stronger than other PPS uh so and I

17:59

think the goal is to find the largest PP

18:01

in in a tough time anyway so a big fan

18:05

of pricing power and finding that now

18:07

should wage growth remain elevated as PP

18:10

wanes and get smaller you would end up

18:13

having another drag on earnings so this

18:15

is again suggesting if you're looking

18:17

for companies again your goal is to try

18:19

to find uh the biggest PP that's a

18:21

Credit Suisse piece I'm actually really

18:23

impressed they started talking about PP

18:25

because I think it's very very important

18:26

it's actually the first piece I've

18:28

really seen talk about PP uh in in this

18:30

cycle I'm pretty impressed by that uh

18:32

now this is interesting they called a

18:33

Goldilocks scenario potentially

18:35

transitory here's just another Credit

18:37

Suisse piece

18:38

uh they do not expect a sustained upturn

18:41

in some industrial production numbers

18:43

and uh even though we're we we've seen a

18:46

contraction we're expecting a rebound

18:48

they just don't see that rebound to be

18:49

very large now what is interesting is

18:51

they think the impact of covet zero

18:54

going away in China will be relatively

18:56

limited uh on uh inflationary impacts

19:00

that maybe there'll be some inflationary

19:01

push through to European industry like

19:04

Industries like German manufacturing and

19:06

Autos but otherwise they say that so

19:08

eurokovic was not a major impediment to

19:10

Chinese industrial activity I kind of

19:12

scratched my head a little bit about

19:13

that because I do feel like a lot of

19:14

factories were suffering because of zero

19:16

covet uh and sort of the lockdowns but

19:18

they really think the biggest move up is

19:20

Services which is true I mean that's

19:22

what we're seeing so far in the Boom in

19:24

China is travel and entertainment much

19:26

like what's booming obviously over here

19:28

as well and they think there are clear

19:29

risks to see oil over 90 dollars a

19:32

barrel but then again at the beginning

19:33

of January everybody's like oh oil's

19:35

gonna go to uh a hundred dollars a

19:37

barrel and it just like never ended up

19:39

happening who knows it could still

19:40

happen and now I'm starting to see their

19:42

estimates fall though business surveys

19:44

fall in uh to levels consistent with a

19:46

severe slump and that maybe momentum

19:49

will stabilize the Credit Suisse here

19:51

warning and this aligns with sort of

19:53

their their small PP argument smaller

19:55

pricing power argument they expect that

19:57

consumer strength will fade in the

19:58

months ahead along with retail sales

20:00

trending sideways biggest risks being

20:03

furniture and Appliance demand as home

20:05

sales continue to deteriorate as well as

20:08

business fixed investment likely

20:10

struggling and we do not expect a a

20:13

sharp contraction though so again this

20:16

is really in line with this idea of like

20:18

a shallow kind of recession right

20:20

inventory is still pretty high you saw

20:22

the same complaint about inventory still

20:24

being high at companies like Energizer

20:26

batteries uh this is hitting companies

20:28

like Target and Walmart and so on uh

20:30

however you're still under stocked in

20:33

autos and the argument is that you might

20:35

be seeing uh I hate using this word but

20:37

potentially transitory bump in inflation

20:39

for Autos uh potentially because of the

20:43

under stocking that we're seeing uh they

20:45

do expect that household consumption in

20:47

China will improve this year but again

20:49

likely in Services structural headwinds

20:52

will remain and goods demand will remain

20:54

below pandem pre-pandemic levels a part

20:57

of this is because of an increase in

20:58

precautionary savings by individuals

21:00

because of wealth lost thanks to lower

21:02

property prices remember their real

21:04

estate a disaster was somewhere in the

21:06

effect of uh you know 35 to 40 percent

21:09

price decline so you've got some major

21:11

hits over there from China so Emerging

21:15

Markets X China generally people are

21:17

pretty bullish however inflation is

21:19

still present sent in Emerging Markets

21:21

so you have to kind of be careful in

21:23

Latin America they think you're you're

21:25

still seeing supply side issues uh

21:27

that'll really hurt the pace of

21:29

disinflation and I see that when I

21:31

analyze Embraer I mean they're still

21:33

suffering man with with uh increasing in

21:35

prices and supply chain shortages and

21:37

stuff uh which in the short term does

21:39

give them uh some more pricing power for

21:41

for selling Jets but uh yeah you know

21:44

that's uh that's oh yeah oh yeah and

21:48

then there's this idea of a Vibe session

21:49

okay I'm gonna be very brief about that

21:51

the idea of a Vibe session is that

21:53

basically uh everybody feels like we're

21:55

going into a recession but maybe we

21:57

don't actually end up hitting a

21:58

recession that's sort of consistent with

22:00

the idea of a soft landing and I thought

22:02

it was really an interesting phrase like

22:03

really A vibe session that sounds pretty

22:05

lame but okay I'll address it so uh

22:08

you've got you've got really in my

22:11

opinion if you kind of look at this like

22:13

all this sort of more bearish analysis

22:15

anything pointing to a recession is kind

22:18

of like okay yeah earnings are gonna go

22:19

down but how much and and it's really

22:22

like okay so we might go into recession

22:23

but how much and it's kind of like

22:25

nominally like it doesn't really seem

22:27

like people are really like that worried

22:30

that this is gonna be uh fall off the

22:31

cliff style recession although who knows

22:34

uh and I think tomorrow's CPI will give

22:36

us a little bit of uh of uh of uh an

22:38

indicator yeah take it in the margin man

22:41

take it to the margin

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.