TRANSCRIPTEnglish

this could DESTROY us.

38m 29s6,431 words991 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Right now, we're analyzing Carvana, and

0:02

somebody suggested I go check out this

0:04

video and react to it and add some color

0:06

to what's going on because there might

0:09

be some unsustainable circular financing

0:11

going on at Carvana. That may at first

0:14

glance not necessarily be illegal, but

0:17

it could be the first thing that

0:19

collapses in this whole private credit

0:22

disaster we're in. So, we're going to

0:24

react to this video by Upper Echelon,

0:26

the Carvana scam, a predatory bubble.

0:28

And it's interesting because it comes at

0:30

a time where we've seen the collapse of

0:32

first brands and tririccolor which we've

0:34

covered significantly on the channel

0:36

leading to Jaime Diamond suggests that

0:38

there are cockroaches in the economy

0:41

that as they show up there's usually not

0:44

just one cockroach there tend to be

0:47

more. And then as that warning is being

0:50

made, remember what I said? I mentioned

0:53

that companies are going to start

0:54

analyzing their books really closely and

0:57

people are going to start getting more

0:58

sus about private credit. Well, what's

1:01

starting to happen? Carvana technically

1:04

beats on adjusted earnings, on uh GAP

1:08

EPS, on revenue, but the stock dumps 9

1:11

to 13%. Interesting. Now, at the same

1:15

time, BlackRock just announced that they

1:18

are quote ens snared by loans tied to

1:21

firms accused of fraud. This is another

1:24

private credit issue. Take a look at

1:26

this. Black Rockck and two and and other

1:29

creditors are grappling with the fallout

1:32

from loans made to two teleco firms and

1:36

companies that are now they are now

1:37

accusing of fraud. Lenders uh lenders

1:40

like Black Rockck are suing Broadcom

1:43

Telecom and Bridge accusing the firms of

1:47

fabricating accounts receivable fraud

1:50

that collateral agent lawyers call

1:53

breathtaking in scope. So in other

1:56

words, more cockroaches, more accounts

1:59

receivable fraud, which is exactly the

2:02

kind of fraud that we saw at First

2:04

Brands, which is exactly the kind of

2:06

fraud that the auditor for First Brands

2:10

failed to uncover and had previously

2:13

gotten sanctioned for by the PCAOB,

2:17

saying, "You guys failed. We're finding

2:19

you millions of dollars for in the past

2:20

in like 2017 failing to find accounts

2:23

receivable fraud. They fail again with

2:25

first brands and now we're seeing even

2:28

BlackRock is losing billions of dollars

2:30

due to accounts receivable fraud. Uh as

2:33

as you know we could go through this but

2:34

we can see here listing liabilities as

2:36

much as $1 billion with creditors

2:39

including BlackRock and other companies.

2:42

These are big deals and nobody's really

2:44

reading these articles because they

2:46

don't actually make it to the top yet.

2:49

But the cockroaches are starting to come

2:51

out of the rugs. It's it's kind of like

2:52

somebody stepped on the rug and and they

2:54

they killed one cockroach and they're

2:56

like, "Ew, gross." You know, first

2:58

brands and tricolor, but now a bunch

2:59

more are starting to scurry out the

3:01

other end of the rug. It's really nasty

3:04

and it makes you wonder how can a

3:06

company like Carvana

3:09

have 100% gross profit on other sales

3:13

and revenues, a lot of which are going

3:15

to related party entities. Take a look

3:18

at this. Carvana on their annual report

3:22

for 2024 shows us that other sales and

3:25

revenues brought in $1.1 billion of

3:30

revenues. Their gross profit on the

3:34

other segment, $1.15 billion.

3:38

In other words, zero expenses. So,

3:43

they're making 100% gross profit on the

3:46

other side of their business, which is

3:49

the only thing that's really keeping the

3:51

entire business profitable. Because, you

3:54

know, if it weren't for that $1.1

3:56

billion of total profit that somehow

4:00

came in, the company in 2024 would have

4:03

lost money because their net income was

4:05

only $44 million. So, if they're getting

4:09

this random $1.1 billion injection from

4:12

somewhere at no expenses and their net

4:15

income was 404, if you didn't have that

4:17

injection, you'd be upside down by 600

4:19

700 67 uh $100 million. Same thing for

4:23

2023, you'd be upside down. Now, they

4:26

burned their bond holders a few years

4:28

ago and they managed to go straight up

4:30

since then in the stock market. But what

4:33

if their move up in the stock market

4:35

driven by momentum is exactly what's

4:38

exacerbated this cycle? So they burn

4:41

their bond holders that leads the stock

4:43

to go up which allows who? The GarcAs to

4:47

dump shares because they've been dumping

4:49

shares forever.

4:52

Then what if the GarcAs who own or are

4:56

related to Drive Time and uh uh you know

5:00

Bridgerest, the financing companies are

5:03

using their liquidations of stock to

5:06

funnel money into Drive Time and

5:07

Bridgerest to buy out Carvana loans at

5:10

this 100% profit uh uh margin for

5:13

Carvana.

5:15

And the cycle works as long as Carvana

5:17

stock goes up. What it actually means is

5:20

the private credit cycle might not just

5:23

affect private companies. It could

5:25

affect Carvana. They might think, well,

5:27

is Garcia actually selling shares every

5:31

single month? Uh, yeah. If you go to

5:34

NASDAQ market activity and you look at

5:38

uh the last 12 months of shares traded,

5:43

over 75% of the time you're getting

5:46

shares sold. And look at Garcia almost

5:50

every single month. 10,000 shares,

5:52

10,000 shares, 10,000 shares. This is

5:54

just these are just multiple days here

5:56

in October of what's already disclosed.

5:58

Look at all these. Garcia, Garcia,

6:00

Garcia, Garcia, Garcia. Every single day

6:02

almost in uh September. We're selling

6:06

shares. Every single day almost. Every

6:09

single trading day almost in August.

6:11

We're selling shares. Selling shares.

6:14

Selling shares. Selling shares. Well,

6:15

maybe he's just wanting to finance his

6:16

lifestyle as a billionaire. You know,

6:18

hey, may as well, right? Sure. Maybe.

6:22

Unless they're using these share sales

6:25

to prop up the revenues at Carvana,

6:28

hoping that when they beat on earnings,

6:30

the stock goes up so they could keep

6:32

this circular financing going. It's a

6:35

little Ponzi. Now, we're not saying it's

6:38

illegal or wrong. We're just saying it

6:41

raises eyebrows that the income that's

6:44

coming in from financing receivables at

6:47

Carvana which is a public company which

6:50

is exactly the same place there's fraud

6:52

going on with Black Rockck there's fraud

6:54

going on atricolor and first brands it

6:57

is really interesting that Carvana gets

6:59

this 100% margin injection of financing

7:02

receivables see now people say oh well

7:04

it's because they have you know really

7:06

high interest rate subprime loans that's

7:08

true you So the the trick with Carvana

7:11

people say is you buy on Carvana, you

7:14

get your loan on Carvana and you

7:16

instantaneously refinance because the

7:18

rates are so high. This is what people

7:20

say in the rumor mill or you know if you

7:22

go on Reddit or whatever that's sort of

7:24

the word on the street. Uh and the sales

7:29

pitch there is well Carvana makes it

7:31

easy for you to get the loan directly

7:32

through the app. So maybe the loans are

7:34

just that much more profitable and

7:35

they're able to sell those in the

7:36

private markets for way more of a profit

7:39

than what you typically see. Well, I

7:42

haven't watched this video yet, but I'm

7:44

curious if they're going to dive into

7:45

any of this, but I wanted to start with

7:48

what I'm seeing going on and kind of

7:50

where I raise my eyebrows going, okay,

7:52

this is great in a bull market when

7:54

everything's going up, but this could be

7:56

a negative 99% play if private credit

8:00

starts boiling over and it's a public

8:02

stock that would be the recipient of

8:04

this private credit issue, which that's

8:06

always what you find is people are like,

8:08

"Oh, it's just, you know, private

8:10

credit's not going to affect stocks.

8:12

It's not going to affect banks. It's a

8:13

small portion of the market. Meanwhile,

8:16

when First Brands goes under, you see

8:17

Jeffre gets destroyed. Uh you see JP

8:20

Morgan take losses. You see massive

8:23

banks take losses. I mean, look at

8:25

Jeffre stock. Jeffre stock tanked uh

8:28

after the write down and loss that they

8:31

had from First Brands. Uh and you saw a

8:34

little bit of a recovery, but you're

8:36

already back on the downtrend. And so

8:38

obviously we mask a lot of this private

8:41

credit pain by you know what's going on

8:43

with mega caps and the mag 7 for example

8:46

this morning in the alpha report we were

8:47

really bullish on Netflix over here

8:50

because of the technicals of what

8:52

happened yesterday and then the

8:53

announcement of a stock split. It's been

8:55

it's now basically straight up on the

8:57

day. This has been a great trade. So

8:59

congratulations to everybody in the

9:00

alpha report. But with all that said

9:02

let's go into what this Carvana scam

9:03

predatory bubble is and we'll react to

9:05

it. We'll see. Maybe they'll say

9:07

something similar. Maybe they'll say

9:08

something different. But oftentimes

9:10

where there's smoke, there's fire. Where

9:12

there's one cockroach, there more. So,

9:13

let's see. Now, for this next one,

9:15

you're going to want to remember

9:16

gemini.com/kevin.

9:18

You know, all those everyday purchases,

9:20

gas, groceries, takeout, even your

9:23

morning coffee. They're small, but they

9:25

add up fast. Now, imagine if every one

9:28

of those transactions helped you build

9:30

your Bitcoin or crypto portfolio

9:32

automatically. Well, that's exactly what

9:35

today's sponsor, the Gemini credit card,

9:38

does at gemini.com/kevin or in the link

9:41

below. It's the only credit card that

9:43

gives you instant Bitcoin rewards with

9:45

no points, no conversions, no waiting,

9:48

no miles, no confusion, no decay, no

9:51

expirations. You just get crypto. Here's

9:55

how it works. You get up to 4% back on

9:58

transportation, up to 3% back on dining,

10:00

up to 2% back on groceries, up to 1%

10:03

back on everything else. All paid out

10:05

instantaneously in Bitcoin or any of the

10:08

other 50 plus cryptos that you choose

10:10

the moment your transaction clears. No

10:13

more guessing what your points are

10:15

worth, complicated redemption processes.

10:17

Just spend like normal and earn crypto

10:20

instead of cash or other random things

10:23

back. Just get crypto back. And for

10:25

perspective, card holders who held their

10:28

Bitcoin rewards for one year saw an

10:31

average 279%

10:34

increase in value. Of course, crypto is

10:36

volatile, so past performance isn't a

10:39

guaranteed. It's obviously not a

10:40

guarantee of future result, but it's an

10:42

eye-opening stat if you want exposure

10:44

without actually having to go through

10:46

the process of buying Bitcoin yourself

10:48

or even reminding you to do it. There's

10:51

no annual fee for this card. You could

10:53

check if you're eligible with no impact

10:54

to your credit score by going to

10:56

gemini.com/kevin

10:58

to apply. And when you're approved and

11:00

spend $3,000 in your first 90 days, you

11:02

get $200 in Bitcoin. That's

11:05

gemini.com/kevvin.

11:07

Or click the link in the description

11:09

below.

11:10

>> Currently, pretty much the entire global

11:12

economy feels like a propped up scam.

11:14

Trillions in corporate value, investor

11:16

musical chairs.

11:17

>> This is just going to be like an intro

11:18

monologue, huh? All right, let's I want

11:20

to get into Carvana. multiple similar

11:22

cycles with some of the most broken

11:23

underlying business practices I've ever

11:25

seen and some of the most vibrantly

11:27

waving red flags you can possibly

11:28

imagine.

11:30

>> Obviously, as per the video title, that

11:31

company is Carvana, which I believe is a

11:33

perfect example of what happens when

11:35

greedy people create a bad business with

11:37

nowhere to possibly end up other than

11:39

bankruptcy.

11:40

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, so far based

11:42

on what I'm seeing, I agree with this.

11:44

Like keep in mind, like I said, if he's

11:47

going to talk about what I'm talking

11:48

about, you do not necessarily

11:52

say this is fraud, right? Like to to

11:56

take Carvana and to publicly disclose

11:59

that you're getting all this money from

12:00

a related party. If that related party

12:03

wants to overpay

12:05

for Carvana loans, technically that's

12:08

not fraud. It's just circular because it

12:12

means you're taking money from Carvana

12:14

stock by liquidating Carvana stock.

12:17

You're overpaying for Carvana

12:19

receivables, right? So, you dump Carvana

12:22

stock so you have the cash. You use that

12:23

cash to go buy those receivables at

12:25

Carvana at a premium, which makes

12:27

Carvana look more profitable, which

12:29

makes the stock go up, which gives you

12:30

the license to go sell more stock, have

12:33

more money to go keep buying more of

12:34

those loans. It's not illegal if it's

12:38

perfectly disclosed like that, which it

12:40

appears to be, right? It's hiding in

12:41

plain sight. The problem is the cycle

12:45

stops if you can't sell shares anymore.

12:48

If Carvana starts tanking because people

12:50

get nervous about private credit shares,

12:51

it'll get those that tanking will be

12:54

accelerated by Garcia needing to

12:56

continue to dump shares and that's when

12:59

you'll hit escape velocity. The momentum

13:01

will go from up to down. anybody who's

13:04

in it for the trade, the meme trade from

13:05

when they b burned their bond holders,

13:07

you know, back at four bucks or

13:09

whatever, they're getting out and you go

13:11

to zero. So, I'm kind of curious to see

13:13

what they say in this video.

13:14

>> For anyone who isn't aware, Carvana is a

13:17

used car reseller, sort of with a near

13:19

$40 billion valuation. Initially founded

13:22

in 2012 by a man named Ernest Garcia III

13:25

as a subsidiary of another company

13:27

called Drive Time, Carvana has already

13:29

gone through a complete cycle of bubble

13:32

burst almost bankrupt and now an even

13:34

larger bubble,

13:35

>> right? And they would have guess who

13:36

they bailed out in that bankruptcy.

13:38

Well, the near bankruptcy, guess who got

13:40

bailed out, which was shocking, mind

13:42

you. People were blown away by this

13:44

because usually shareholders get burned

13:47

when you're about to go bankrupt. Guess

13:49

who got burned instead? the bond

13:51

holders. Guess who won? The

13:54

shareholders,

13:55

Mr. Garcia.

13:58

The cycle. It enabled the cycle.

14:01

>> Again, just as a brief overview, the

14:03

company IPOed at $15 a share. Business

14:07

model is

14:08

>> Obviously, we can see that the cycle is

14:10

now repeating itself. Carvana,

14:12

>> I know. Just tell me what's going on.

14:13

>> CEO of Carvana, Ernest Garcia III, as

14:16

well as pretty much every single other

14:18

internal executive. But the CEO by far

14:20

the most of those people.

14:22

>> I like how they used Fintel to show this

14:24

on one sheet because he just did a lot

14:26

of scrolling and you could see we're

14:28

still in October.

14:30

Like that's the thing. Like these

14:32

people, oh my gosh, he keeps going.

14:34

Dude, look at this.

14:35

>> Has been aggressively selling tens of

14:37

millions of dollars worth of the

14:39

company's stock, a multigenerational

14:41

trust almost every single calendar day

14:44

like clockwork.

14:45

>> Yes, that's the thing. is because they

14:47

need to to keep the cycle going.

14:50

>> The vacuum, it doesn't really mean all

14:51

that much. Never a good sign, but

14:54

certainly not always bad. Yet, what

14:56

should the takeaway be when the highest

14:58

ranking members of a company are only

15:00

ever selling hundreds of thousands of

15:03

shares in

15:03

>> Okay, it this is not uncommon. I mean,

15:06

in Jensen's Nvidia uh uh or Nvidia's

15:09

Jensen, I should say Jensen's Nvidia. I

15:11

mean, it may as well be Jensen's Nvidia.

15:12

You know, he sells shares, too. That's

15:14

not necessarily a red flag. Uh the red

15:17

flag is what's going on here that

15:20

they're probably selling to prop up the

15:21

books

15:22

>> their own business. Also the key term to

15:25

remember for late

15:27

>> except if you dig deeper even just a

15:29

tiny bit financing page you can see

15:31

quote 99% approval rate

15:34

>> right because like there was I was

15:36

reading on Reddit yesterday somebody

15:37

with $2,000 a month of income and like a

15:40

700 credit score. They're like I'm

15:42

pissed off I got approved for a loan but

15:44

it's 18%. Like, bro, how are you getting

15:46

a loan on a car with $24,000 of annual

15:49

income? Like, they're giving loans to

15:51

everyone because it doesn't matter.

15:54

Like, if you think about it, it doesn't

15:55

matter if the loan goes bad. All they

15:58

want is the stock to go up. That's all

16:00

they want. So, they literally move the

16:03

risk from Carvana to Drive Time or

16:06

Bridgeest, which they're all related, we

16:09

believe. Uh, and even if they have

16:12

losses over there, it doesn't matter

16:14

because the losses can be offset by all

16:16

the money they're making from dumping

16:17

the stock. And so it makes Carvana look

16:20

like it only goes up and it's the best

16:22

business model ever.

16:23

>> All credit situations welcome. End

16:25

quote. That's honestly fantastic from

16:28

>> that's like by the way

16:31

uh they had a thing where they're like,

16:32

"We don't check credit. You don't even

16:34

need anything but a passport and a pulse

16:36

and we'll give you a loan." and they

16:38

went bankrupt like overnight.

16:40

>> From a consumer perspective, if you need

16:42

a vehicle, Carvana is almost certainly

16:44

willing to sell you one. But now, let's

16:46

look at the details, right? Yeah. It

16:49

turns out that Carvana's only

16:50

requirements are that customers be 18

16:52

plus earning at least

16:54

>> earn $5,100

16:56

per year. I mean, that's like working

16:58

part-time at Jamba Juice. That's how

16:59

much I made when I worked part-time at

17:01

Jamba Juice.

17:02

>> $5,100

17:03

per year, not per month, per year with

17:06

no bankruptcies. That's it. Back in

17:09

2024, which isn't all that long ago

17:11

even, it was even lower, by the way. It

17:13

was just $4,000.

17:15

>> Requirements and pricing were the

17:16

absolute bare minimum.

17:17

>> I'm sorry. I have such little patience.

17:20

>> Just get to the point.

17:22

>> Change, but not like 500% or something.

17:24

But during the same period, on average,

17:26

almost every other type of default is

17:29

dramatically down. Home equity,

17:31

personal,

17:31

>> right? We know car loans are defaulting

17:33

more because we have a K-shaped

17:34

recovery. We know. We know that.

17:37

It sucks. It really sucks. People want

17:40

to just get to their damn job and

17:43

inflation has made everything so

17:44

freaking expensive and labor wages are

17:48

not going up at pace. People are getting

17:51

screwed.

17:51

>> Exactly what Carvana deliberately

17:53

targets. Now for the fun part. When you

17:56

use Carvana, taking out a loan for that

17:58

sweet new vehicle, well used vehicle in

18:01

this case, the loan itself is serviced

18:03

by a company called Bridgerest. Serve

18:05

just means they collect the payments.

18:06

You make the payments to them. That this

18:08

doesn't matter. That doesn't mean they

18:09

actually hold the loan

18:10

>> which is another subsidiary of drive

18:12

time just like Carvana.

18:14

>> Correct. Drive time is owned by the

18:15

GarcAs. There you go. Perfect

18:17

>> to be. But now we need to clarify

18:19

ownership. Carvana itself is a publicly

18:22

traded company. Yes. But at the very

18:24

same time, it also exists as something

18:26

called a controlled company because the

18:29

CEO, Ernest Garcia III, and the CEO's

18:32

father, Ernest Garcia II, who also owns

18:36

Drive Time, have majority voting power,

18:38

and thus they make all of the actual

18:40

decisions.

18:40

>> That's okay. Mark Zuckerberg has

18:42

majority voting power at Meta. Uh, you

18:45

know, that's not necessarily a bad

18:46

thing. uh that can sometimes be a good

18:48

thing because it it you know makes sure

18:50

a founders's vision can can can be uh

18:52

you know perpetually promoted through

18:55

the life of a company. So that's not

18:56

necessarily a bad thing.

18:57

>> It's a little bit complicated if you

18:59

break down the entire spiderweb, but the

19:01

general point is that Carvana initially

19:03

began as a subsidiary of drive time

19:05

until it was spun off and IPOed to the

19:07

public.

19:08

>> Correct. and and so I mean really

19:10

Carvana doesn't have much risk with

19:13

these loans which is a great thing for

19:15

Carvana because they're just dumping it

19:16

to the subsidiaries. The thing is that

19:19

cycle stops if the owners can't sell

19:21

Carvana stock anymore because the stock

19:23

is tanking. So it's all good until it's

19:26

not. The problem is if the tank begins

19:30

the then then all of a sudden people's

19:32

like here's the thing people buy stocks

19:35

because the chart is going up. Okay,

19:37

that's human psychology. The chart goes

19:39

up, people buy the stock. As soon as the

19:41

chart starts going down like what you

19:44

saw in Tesla in 2022,

19:47

and the insiders are dumping,

19:50

all of a sudden that dumping accelerates

19:53

the selling because you don't have new

19:55

people to buy. You don't have that

19:57

greater fool buying. That's the biggest

19:59

risk.

20:00

>> Meanwhile, Drive Time created Bridgerest

20:02

way back in 2003 to service their auto

20:05

loans. And now Bridgecrest also works

20:07

with Carvana. In essence, the son owns

20:10

Carvana. The dad owns the company that

20:12

offers the loans to Carvana customer.

20:14

>> This part doesn't matter. Let's go.

20:16

>> We drive time wasn't always called drive

20:19

time.

20:20

>> Back in the 1970s and even more notably

20:22

during the final years of its run.

20:24

>> This was the burning of the bond

20:25

holders. We get it.

20:26

>> 2025, one quarter later, Carvana had

20:28

over $2 billion of vehicle assets. If

20:32

you then go backwards in 2024, you

20:34

continue to see inventory growth and

20:37

yes, fluctuations, wild fluctuations in

20:39

their inventory.

20:40

>> Of course, inventory is going to grow

20:42

because you guys also have so much damn

20:43

money because the stock has done very

20:45

well. So, of course, the business is

20:46

going to grow. This is not a surprise.

20:47

>> Do certainly happen. But the last time

20:49

they experienced a glut of that size,

20:52

which continued to then grow, was right

20:54

about the same time they almost went

20:56

bankrupt.

20:56

>> Okay. making the argument that because

20:58

inventory is growing, uh, there's the

21:00

possibility of them going BK again

21:02

because it's getting harder to sell

21:03

cars. Uh, it look, I do think it's fair

21:06

to argue that you're you probably aren't

21:10

in the best time to try to sell cars to

21:13

people because it is a hard economic

21:15

time, especially for for folks who just

21:18

need to get by. But you could always

21:19

give you you you sell monthly payments.

21:22

That's what you do with cars, right? You

21:24

sell monthly payments. But I mean, look,

21:26

he's right. Inventory is rising. Uh,

21:28

you've got vehicle inventory sitting

21:30

right here at $2.3 billion versus 16

21:32

last year. So, this is not wrong. Uh,

21:35

but the balance sheet is not bad at

21:37

Carvana. You know, you've got long-term

21:39

debt of $4.8 billion. But current

21:42

liabilities, bills due within the next

21:44

12 months are 1.5. They've got more cash

21:47

than they have bills for the next 12

21:49

months. They've got accounts receivable

21:51

here. We've got inventory. We've got

21:53

enough money to pay our bills and our

21:54

debts at Carvana. They've done a very

21:56

good job actually at keeping the Carvana

21:59

balance sheet good and to some extent

22:01

you want a greater inventory because you

22:03

want those vehicle sales to grow. Look

22:05

at vehicle sales growth. This would not

22:08

be possible if it weren't for more

22:10

inventory. So that's not the smoking gun

22:12

here, sir. Upper echelon. Uh they grew

22:15

car sales by 57%. I don't actually

22:19

believe that them selling more cars is

22:22

fraudulent. You know, I think that

22:24

because they're giving everybody a loan,

22:26

they're enabling more of these car

22:28

sales. I have much more concern with

22:31

these related party transactions, which

22:34

hopefully this individual actually gets

22:36

to here at some point in this 14minute

22:38

video

22:39

>> worth because cars happen to be a

22:41

rapidly depreciating asset.

22:44

How far-fetched would it be if Carvana

22:47

was buying and selling as many cars as

22:49

they can to people who can't or likely

22:51

won't pay back these loans? A lot of

22:53

>> in fairness, that is how subprime works.

22:56

If you're a subprime lender, okay, let

22:59

me just pretend we're you and I. Okay,

23:01

you and I, we're subprime lenders. Okay,

23:04

here's how this works.

23:08

Hey, you know these guys are going to

23:10

default, right?

23:13

Yeah. Yeah, we know they're going to

23:14

default. All right, so here's what we

23:16

got to do. We got to make sure we get

23:19

all our money back on these loans after

23:21

they make just three payments. So, we're

23:24

going to sell them the car for 20 grand

23:27

that's worth 19. We're going to make

23:30

sure we get a $300 profit per month. So,

23:34

that way we've now made $21,200.

23:39

And the residual like you know the

23:41

residual value is 19K.

23:45

And so if worst case scenario we got to

23:48

go in there and repossess this car,

23:53

we've got margin after just three

23:56

payments. And then if they go BK, we'll

23:59

go repossess. We'll assume we're not

24:01

going to be able to get 10% of them back

24:04

because, you know, they're going to

24:05

fight us on the repos or whatever. And

24:07

so we'll factor that in and we'll make

24:09

money all the time as long as they make

24:12

three payments. That's roughly just so

24:14

you know how the subprime I'm, you know,

24:16

obviously making up some of the numbers

24:17

here, but that's roughly how the

24:18

subprime game is played. The goal is to

24:20

make as much money as possible within

24:22

the first 3 months because they assume

24:24

you are going to stop paying at some

24:26

point. Like if you make your payment for

24:28

more than 3 months, they're honestly

24:29

like sucker.

24:32

It's a brutal game

24:33

>> of them rapidly inflating their metrics

24:36

then offloading the debt or even excess

24:38

inventory perhaps on bridger crest and

24:40

drive time. The father and the son

24:43

continue to make billions of dollars by

24:45

just perpetually dumping their shares

24:47

every single day. And

24:49

>> okay, you've said that four damn times.

24:51

WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE

24:52

FINANCING RECEIVABLES?

24:54

>> Clear indications of this happening. By

24:56

the way, in their financial data, we can

24:58

see other sales and revenue as well as

25:00

wholesale sales and revenue for hundreds

25:03

of millions of dollars from

25:04

>> are you going to talk about the profit

25:05

margin

25:06

>> quote related third parties which

25:08

>> okay fine

25:09

>> would be something like drive time

25:11

presumably because the father of the CEO

25:13

as they jointly control the company owns

25:16

that too. Are we starting to see the

25:18

conflict of interest here? To be clear,

25:20

this isn't exactly an industry secret.

25:22

There's plenty of people getting wise to

25:24

what's happening right now, including a

25:25

300 being a pump and dump scheme for the

25:27

benefit of its owners. The first

25:29

iteration of that lawsuit was dismissed

25:31

because it was an impermissible puzzle

25:33

as it's called, which basically means it

25:35

didn't quite link all the parties

25:36

together well enough. But that really

25:38

just means rewrite it better and come

25:40

back to me from the judge, which they

25:42

did. And now that lawsuit, I believe, is

25:44

making its way through the system

25:45

actively. On page two, we

25:47

>> The thing about lawsuits is lawsuits

25:49

drag on for years.

25:51

And like you could kind of keep the

25:53

cycle going, right? It's actually

25:55

interesting. The scheme required Carvana

25:57

to enter into a sham pass through sales

26:00

arrangement with drive time to increase

26:02

its reported sales. Flout state motor

26:05

and title registration laws and

26:07

regulations. Abandon its purchase and

26:09

verification standards. Obscure critical

26:11

metrics related to uh retail gross

26:13

profits per unit. Implement an

26:16

unsustainable nationwide expansion.

26:18

conceal critical information related to

26:20

its average days to sale measure

26:22

misrepresent per vehicle profitability.

26:25

Yeah. Defendants Garcia Jr. CEO Garcia

26:28

Jun and Garcia Senior and Mark Jenkins,

26:31

all of them dump shares, by the way,

26:33

implemented a scheme to artificially

26:34

pump Carvana stock price. Oh, I totally

26:36

agree with that. Now, we don't know,

26:38

right? Like I want to be clear, the

26:40

things I'm talking about in my video,

26:41

they're just picking up on if this is

26:43

exactly what's happening, which is our

26:45

opinion that it's happening. It's fine

26:48

until the stock price goes down. That's

26:50

that's what matters.

26:51

>> Quote, this scheme required car

26:54

to violating state laws. I have no short

26:57

positions. No offer.

27:00

You want to sell your car? Definitely.

27:01

>> Okay. Listen. Okay.

27:04

I think he scratched the surface here.

27:07

Could have been a little bit more clear

27:08

about what the implications are to the

27:10

stock. Decent video, cool little

27:12

graphics. I don't have that kind of

27:13

stuff. Good for him. But I think what

27:16

you really ought to pay attention to are

27:18

those margins on those related party

27:20

transactions. Uh and so if we look at uh

27:24

you know just disclosures in their books

27:26

of related party transactions

27:29

uh we can also see that a lot of the

27:31

debts that Carvana has are to related

27:34

parties. So, uh, the $400 million in

27:37

leases,

27:38

uh, some of this are from some of these

27:42

are from related parties. Under these

27:44

other liabilities, the larger portion

27:46

over here, uh, you've got, uh, 98 and

27:50

$48 million to due to related parties.

27:53

So, basically almost all of it right

27:55

here due to related parties. Current

27:57

liabilities, you've also got uh, well, I

28:00

guess maybe not all of it because these

28:01

are the two different years, right? So

28:03

95 million out of 142 as an example.

28:06

That's how to read this. You've got 66%

28:09

of their other liabilities are just

28:11

debts to themselves, right? So there's

28:14

there's just a lot of this that it makes

28:16

sense how they're playing this game and

28:20

it's fine until it's not. Accounts

28:22

payable. $23 million payable to related

28:26

parties. Related party transactions

28:29

2014. uh the company and drivetime

28:32

automotive together with it with with

28:34

its affiliates drive time uh a related

28:37

party company due to Garcia and Garcia

28:40

uh controlling one or both uh entered

28:42

into a lease for different for you know

28:45

some locations whatever uh accounts

28:48

payable related transactions tax

28:50

receivable related transactions tax

28:54

payments on behalf of non-controlling

28:56

members the company made mandatory and

28:59

withholding tax payments on behalf of

29:01

the GarcAs. I mean, this is like a slush

29:04

fund for the GarcAs.

29:06

Uh, company recorded TRA $170 and $82

29:09

million respectively, of which 132 will

29:13

be paid to related parties again. So,

29:15

the vast majority going to related

29:17

parties, operating leases. I mean, the

29:21

whole thing is is basically you're not

29:24

investing in Carvana. You're investing

29:26

in the Garcia scheme, and it's fine for

29:30

now

29:32

until it's not until the GarcAs can't

29:35

afford to overpay uh for those loans.

29:38

Now, maybe they're not, but again,

29:41

that's the scary part. And I think

29:43

there's no surprise that when you look

29:44

at the quarterly reports, they're not

29:46

actually breaking down their costs of

29:48

sales right here, right? Uh they're not

29:51

breaking down their cost of sales. But

29:53

look at this. If you look at So what do

29:56

we have here? Retail sales. Uh so we've

29:58

got total net sales and operat.

30:03

In the quarter, our gross profit is

30:07

1.148. If I divide those into each

30:10

other, I've got a gross margin of about

30:12

20%. Which seems great. But again, if

30:15

you go to the annual report and you take

30:16

out those uh related party transactions,

30:20

where did we where we had the annual

30:21

report? I think I already closed it. We

30:23

go to that annual report and you see

30:24

there's no margin, no expense margin on

30:26

it, you start raising your eyebrows a

30:29

little bit and going, "Wait a second.

30:30

Let's go look at it again just because I

30:32

think it's so interesting. Let's go to

30:33

the annual report." And so you can pull

30:35

it up right here. I'll show you exactly

30:37

where it is. So, annual report PDF. And

30:41

you know what? Let's turn the

30:42

highlighter on for it for the giggles.

30:45

And

30:47

did I break it on the highlighter

30:48

extension? I think I did. [laughter]

30:51

That's all right. We'll go ahead and

30:52

pull it up again without uh the

30:54

highlighter tool. That's sad. I wanted

30:56

to use the highlighter. It's all right.

30:58

Here we go. So, jump on into

31:03

earnings. Earnings. Earnings. Earnings.

31:04

Earnings. Earnings.

31:07

H.

31:09

Okay, there we go.

31:12

Here we go.

31:14

Yeah, other gross profit. Let's see

31:17

their note on it.

31:21

So, other sales and revenues from

31:24

related parties. So, they're saying 200

31:27

from related parties here. Uh, so that's

31:30

interesting because let's see what notes

31:32

they have on other sales and revs

31:34

because they there should be a breakdown

31:37

here.

31:40

Other sales and revenues consist of 100%

31:43

gross margin products for which gross

31:45

profit equals revenue, which is a red

31:48

flag in itself. And they're blatantly

31:51

disclosing it here. So that's the thing.

31:53

This is where you can't really call it

31:55

fraud because they're so blatant about

31:57

it.

32:00

It's just circular. Let's see if we can

32:01

find anything else and then we'll be

32:02

done with it. Other liquidity resources.

32:08

I want to see who they're selling these

32:10

to.

32:12

Other investing financing.

32:18

Tax receivable arrangements. That's

32:20

fine.

32:23

They don't give much more of a

32:24

definition of this. They just say 100%

32:27

gross margin products. Other sales

32:31

primarily due to an increasing gain on

32:33

loan sales due to increased units sold

32:35

more loan sales and higher loan spreads.

32:40

Right?

32:42

Other sales and revenue

32:54

wild. Yeah. So

32:58

let me see here. Cost of other gross

33:01

profit and any other disclaimer here. No

33:06

[clears throat] 200. Okay. At least

33:09

right here they're showcasing that maybe

33:13

only 200 or they're only disclosing that

33:16

200 million of these other sales and

33:20

revenues are from related parties. So,

33:24

it's unclear what the other entities are

33:26

that are involved in this. Are there

33:29

potentially undisclosed relations or

33:31

these other Wall Street private credit

33:34

firms coming in to buy out these loans

33:36

at a premium sort of propped up by

33:38

Garcia? Is, you know, the Garcia family

33:41

potentially buying, you know, the worst

33:44

of the loans and letting other Wall

33:46

Street companies take the others at 100%

33:48

profit to uh uh uh to Carvana to kind of

33:52

keep the cycle going. It's unclear. The

33:54

reason it's unclear is because we don't

33:56

get a lot of color. They just tell us

33:58

that other sales and revenue are a 100%

34:01

gross profit business and that it's

34:03

going up because they're doing more

34:05

business. That's it. That's all they

34:07

tell us. Other sales and revenues

34:09

consist of 100% gross margin products

34:11

for which gross profit equals revenue.

34:13

So, they're bluntly telling us that

34:15

private credit is coming in and

34:17

providing us massive amounts of money. a

34:20

chunk of it, we don't know which chunk,

34:22

probably the bad chunk, is going to the

34:24

GarcAs so they could absorb or hide

34:26

those losses. That's an opinion to keep

34:28

the cycle going. But again, if it

34:30

weren't for those loan sales, that's

34:32

where you look at their net income and

34:34

you say, "Okay, well, if it weren't for

34:35

the loan sales, we'd be losing money,"

34:38

which we talked about earlier. So, who

34:40

knows? Maybe the whole thing will keep

34:42

going. Maybe. Maybe all those loans are

34:46

so high quality and it's a really

34:48

sustainable business model, but I can't

34:50

help but feel that the private credit

34:52

stresses we're seeing could start

34:54

putting pressure on Carvana. And the

34:56

biggest concern is that once you get

34:58

pressure on Carvana stock, you limit

35:02

Garcia's ability to liquidate shares at

35:05

at strong prices to keep people buying

35:09

the stock in the face of the insiders

35:11

dumping.

35:13

Once the trend breaks down, I would

35:15

argue once we break 296 and these

35:18

private credit fears exacerbate, we will

35:21

probably relatively rapidly fall 50% if

35:25

not more on Carvana stock. Now, I too I

35:27

don't have a position for or against

35:29

this company. It doesn't matter to me.

35:30

I'm not short it. I just look at this as

35:33

this could be the biggest victim of the

35:35

private credit crisis

35:37

because of how the business is

35:38

structured. And I would just be very

35:40

cautious. Here's somebody else who has a

35:41

piece on Carvana that y'all just talked

35:44

about. Carvana filed its 10K two weeks

35:47

ago. I already highlighted numerous red

35:48

flags. Today, I'm going to present you

35:51

that ultimate proof that the company is

35:53

cheating on its accounting. Oh, okay.

35:54

Let's see the ultimate proof. Carvana

35:57

reported 155,000 cars sold. Fine. the

36:00

numbers continue to grow while the used

36:02

car market is essentially going in the

36:03

opposite direction. But that's okay

36:05

because their app-based product could be

36:08

uh you know gaining a lot of market

36:11

share. I think that the app is probably

36:12

a good product. People seem very happy

36:14

with it. So consider the competition

36:17

growing supply in Carvata's market. It's

36:18

fair to expect a impact on the margins.

36:21

Not necessarily. No, I I don't think

36:23

that's a smoking gun. I disagree with

36:25

that. And then at this point you might

36:27

ask yourself what's their secret? Total

36:29

gain related to financable receivables.

36:32

Financing receivables sold to financing

36:34

partners was 331 million during the 3

36:38

months ended in 2025.

36:42

8 uh 878 million during the 9 months

36:44

ended September 25. Right. Carvana is

36:48

telling us that 70% of its 1.2 billion

36:50

in sales are gains from selling his

36:52

loans. Oh, it's more than that. It's

36:55

more than that. They're doing these at

36:56

like 100% profit, but that's okay. Uh,

36:59

okay. So, overall, they sold 3.1 billion

37:03

of loans in 25 880 million profits.

37:06

Let's just go with it.

37:08

Uh, who bought these highly radioactive

37:11

subprime earning interests of, you know,

37:15

of of these loans? The only way Carvana

37:18

could make up so much money without this

37:19

blatant fraud, Carvana would never be

37:21

able to report. I don't think this is

37:23

fraud. I actually think this person is

37:25

is dancing on like uh a potential line

37:28

here of of like slandering the company

37:31

because I think they're fully disclosing

37:33

the circular financing they're doing

37:35

which technically isn't fraud. Is it

37:38

wrong because you're making like can you

37:40

make the argument of fraud? Sure. You're

37:42

kind of you're kind of like implying the

37:44

business is really profitable and

37:45

successful uh when it probably isn't.

37:50

But because of all the disclosure,

37:52

they're probably so legal up that they

37:55

could escape the fraud allegations.

37:58

That's my take on that. So, I think

38:00

Daario is going a little far here saying

38:03

it's blatant fraud given the amount of

38:04

disclosure that they put on this. Like,

38:06

somebody who reads it knows, okay, yeah,

38:08

this looks pretty circular. I'm going to

38:10

stay far away.

38:11

>> Why not advertise these things that you

38:12

told us here? I feel like nobody else

38:14

knows about this.

38:15

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

38:16

see how it goes.

38:17

>> Congratulations, man. You have [music]

38:18

done so much. People love you. People

38:20

look up to you.

38:20

>> Kevin Praath there, financial analyst

38:22

and YouTuber. Meet [music] Kevin. Always

38:24

great to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.