TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Banking Crisis JUST got EVEN Worse | Fed, Bank, & Crypto Collapse [SVB]

33m 41s6,386 words906 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

got to talk Silicon Valley Bank and all

0:01

the craziness that's not just happened

0:03

yesterday but that is now unfolding

0:06

after the collapse of Silicon Valley

0:09

Bank so we're going to be talking about

0:10

what's happening with the Federal

0:12

Reserve what are they pricing in who

0:14

just got fired at the Federal Reserve

0:16

we're going to be talking about what the

0:18

Insiders at Silicon Valley Bank are

0:20

doing what kind of a talk there is in

0:22

terms of which businesses might actually

0:24

be affected and these are quite a few

0:26

public companies uh we'll also talk

0:28

about potentially what's going to happen

0:29

on Monday and what the heck is going on

0:33

with usdc uh the circle backed stable

0:38

coin that has potentially Now depegged

0:40

by a total of 8.8 percent as of the time

0:43

of this recording it's pretty remarkable

0:45

on top of that you've got Venture

0:47

capitalists absolutely freaking out

0:49

complete disaster and sh9t show so let

0:52

me give you a very quick synopsis

0:54

basically you had a bank that had

0:57

somewhere around 211 billion dollars in

0:59

assets and then when they actually

1:01

marked to Market which basically means

1:03

like hey you're saying you have all

1:05

these assets but what's the true fair

1:06

market value of those when they did that

1:08

they were basically insolvent once

1:11

rumors started spreading that uh oh this

1:13

bank is insolvent people started getting

1:15

worried about their ability to retain

1:17

access to their cash on hand with this

1:20

bank that represented 50 percent of

1:23

silicon well close to 50 percent of

1:25

Silicon Valley startups they say they

1:27

they have almost all of the banking

1:29

needs for about 44 percent of Silicon

1:31

Valley baked startups and that's because

1:33

when they give startups loans they'll

1:35

have covenants in their loan agreements

1:37

that say Hey if you want to be able to

1:39

work with our loans our easy lines of

1:43

credit and our easy lending for startup

1:45

you have to have all of your banking at

1:47

Silicon Valley Bank so in other words

1:48

you've got about this 44 group of

1:51

startups that just primarily bank at

1:53

Silicon Valley Bank they were the go-to

1:55

people for startup loans and you

1:57

couldn't have a banking relationship

1:58

somewhere else which what's really weird

2:01

is now that the bank has collapsed sort

2:02

of makes you wonder oh crap if the bank

2:04

collapsed then people even though they

2:09

knew they should probably get out

2:10

probably didn't get out because that

2:13

would violate their loan covenants of

2:15

taking your money out of the bank right

2:16

so imagine if you're a business right

2:18

you're a startup and you've got a

2:20

million dollars of of payroll every

2:22

month that you gotta pay that's 250 000

2:24

a week in payroll that you have to pay

2:27

every Friday potentially so let's say

2:29

you have money over at the bank and

2:30

you're like well crap I'm I'm actually

2:31

using a line of credit to fund my

2:33

business right now because I'm a startup

2:35

and we're in a recessionary environment

2:37

and new Venture Capital funding is

2:39

pretty dry okay Silicon Valley Bank is

2:41

is falling apart oh no maybe I should

2:43

get my money out but wait if I get my

2:45

money out I lose access to my lines of

2:46

credit I can't get my money yet then

2:48

you're stuck now you lose access to

2:49

everything as the company collapses not

2:52

only do you lose access to your line of

2:53

credit but you lose access to whatever

2:54

cash you had left it's a complete sh9t

2:57

show and there are some people going as

2:59

far as saying they this what has just

3:01

happened sets a vast majority of Silicon

3:05

Valley startups back potentially 10

3:07

years because think about it you got

3:09

phenomenal potential startup ideas that

3:12

now don't actually have access to

3:13

Capital operate anymore potentially they

3:15

have to lay off staff if they don't get

3:17

access to that capital and it's not just

3:19

access to the cash it's also access to

3:21

the credit lines right so even if via

3:23

FDIC on Monday somehow we get cash out

3:26

if they don't have access to the the

3:28

easy lending anymore you can actually

3:30

really crimp the entire startup space

3:32

and you're not getting new Venture

3:34

investment not really I mean you are

3:36

getting some in sort of like a chat GPT

3:38

AI style companies but to me the

3:42

valuations are so frothy over there

3:43

anyway that I wouldn't recommend doing

3:45

that at this point but what's remarkable

3:48

is this potential idea that my goodness

3:51

how many startups like even companies

3:54

that have really matured from startup

3:56

stage like matterport bill.com Roblox

3:59

blocks Roku these are all massive

4:02

companies that started in Silicon Valley

4:04

and have a lot of association with

4:06

Silicon Valley Bank matterport has

4:09

stopped sending payments uh through

4:10

Silicon Valley Bank they used to have

4:12

their accounts payable go into Silicon

4:14

Valley bank now they're changing A banks

4:16

obviously because the bank's going into

4:18

receivership you've got Roblox that was

4:21

exposed to Silicon Valley Bank by quite

4:23

a bit Roblox had about 150 million

4:27

dollars at Silicon Valley bank that only

4:29

represents about five percent of their

4:30

cash Lending Club at about 21 million

4:33

rocket lab had 38 million that's about

4:35

eight percent of their cash matterport

4:37

switching banks to JP Morgan

4:39

Etsy was using Silicon Valley Bank for

4:41

some of its uh some of its providers for

4:44

some for payouts to sellers Roblox had

4:47

we mentioned about five percent of their

4:49

casts this was an interesting one Roku

4:51

said they had about 25 of their cash

4:56

sitting in a Silicon Valley bank account

4:58

how coach one fourth of their cash and

5:02

keep in mind roku's still burning money

5:04

that's one of the complaints that I have

5:05

about Roku is they're burning money uh

5:07

kind of it makes me a little nervous

5:10

Sunrun was a company that potentially

5:12

has 15 exposure to Silicon Valley Bank

5:15

and these are all companies that have a

5:17

lot more than the 250 000 FDIC Insurance

5:20

limit remember you get 250 000 of FDIC

5:22

Insurance limit per person per account

5:24

and that includes potential accrued

5:26

interest at your owed so if you're a big

5:28

startup and you've got tens of millions

5:31

of dollars there you might not have

5:32

access to 99 of your Capital at Silicon

5:35

Valley Bank for for a very long period

5:37

of time if ever remember the way FDIC

5:40

receivership works is FDIC is taking

5:42

over the bank as we speak right now on

5:45

Monday they will actually open up the

5:46

branches again and you can bet people

5:48

are just going to be queuing up and

5:50

lighting up to get their money out in

5:52

fact that's exactly what they were doing

5:53

on Friday you could see this uh Twitter

5:56

let's see here look at this Twitter

5:57

video right here you can just people

6:00

lining up queuing outside of these Banks

6:03

there it is Silicon Valley Bank and you

6:04

had a lot of this it wasn't just this

6:06

you had a lot of posts like this

6:07

circulating on Twitter about people

6:09

queuing up at the bank to get their

6:11

money out to the point where security

6:12

guards at these Banks had to lock the

6:15

doors and put signs in like basically

6:16

saying come back Monday now at the same

6:19

time as you had all this drama going on

6:20

listen to this this CEO sold 11 of his

6:26

shares in the company

6:28

3.57 million dollars just 12 days ago so

6:33

the CEO probably saw the writing on the

6:34

wall that they were insolvent I mean

6:36

after all remember you could look at

6:38

their Q4 earning statement and when you

6:40

look at their Q4 earnings statement you

6:42

could actually see how close to

6:43

insolvent they were in December and

6:46

things have only gotten worse since

6:48

December and now we find out that the

6:50

CEO sold 11 of his shares and he hadn't

6:52

been selling in years just all of a

6:54

sudden happens to sell right before this

6:56

collapse doesn't seem sass at all

6:58

doesn't at all seem like Insider trade

7:00

yeah nothing go nothing to see here

7:02

folks and then on top of that the CFO

7:05

sold about uh 375 000 of shares also 12

7:10

days ago so something happened 12 days

7:12

ago I think where they woke up and

7:13

realized

7:15

honey we've got a little bit of a

7:17

problem at the bank maybe we ought to uh

7:19

since we know about it since we're

7:21

insiders maybe we ought to show some of

7:23

our shares but it wasn't just the CEO or

7:26

the CFO you also had the CMO uh selling

7:30

early last month and uh or uh sorry it

7:34

was uh yeah early February and late

7:35

January also selling all three of these

7:38

top Executives selling out uh at least

7:41

some of their stake right before this

7:43

collapsed it's not a good look the CEO

7:46

by the way was apparently a director at

7:49

the San Francisco Federal Reserve this

7:51

shows you how deep this Insanity goes so

7:54

let me say that again the CEO of Silicon

7:57

Valley Bank was one of the directors at

7:59

the San Francisco Federal Reserve and he

8:01

was promptly fired after this uh this

8:04

disaster this banking uh crisis and

8:07

pretty bad look to be selling shares of

8:09

the company that you know is about to go

8:10

to hell but let me just quickly show you

8:12

again how you could see how close they

8:13

were to insolvency as of December 31st

8:16

which remember we're almost through the

8:19

first quarter so these financials are

8:21

already like

8:23

71 days old so you know the people on

8:27

the inside are looking at the financials

8:28

going oh no it's getting even worse but

8:30

look at this all you have to do is it

8:32

like you can make this so so simple you

8:34

go over here and look at total assets

8:37

211.7 billion dollars you look at the

8:39

total liabilities right here right 195

8:42

oops you can't see it there we go so you

8:44

see the difference right here that's

8:45

about 16 billion dollars right total

8:47

assets 211 minus 195 that's about 16

8:50

billion dollars of a difference right

8:51

but wait a minute folks see this number

8:54

right here this 91 billion that 91

8:58

billion is not actually worth 91 million

9:01

or a billion in my opinion this is just

9:03

straight up fraud right here by the way

9:04

how do I know this is not worth 91

9:06

billion because it literally says right

9:08

here hell to maturity Securities fair

9:12

value of

9:14

76.1 billion dollars now yes if they the

9:18

reason they can get away with this is

9:19

because technically if they do hold

9:21

these maturities to or sorry these

9:24

Securities to maturity they're bonds

9:25

okay so it's kind of like hey if you

9:27

have a three year bond if you hold it

9:28

all the way for three years yes it's

9:31

technically worth 91 billies but if

9:34

everybody all of a sudden needs cash

9:35

because we're in a recessionary

9:37

environment the fed's raising rates like

9:38

crazy well you're gonna have to start

9:39

selling and liquidating some of your

9:41

health and maturity Securities and those

9:43

are going to become what are known as

9:44

available for sale Securities whoa

9:46

fantastic well there goes the 16 billion

9:49

dollar difference you had it leaves

9:51

about a bill in the difference but it

9:52

shows you as of December 31st they were

9:55

basically insolvent already based on the

9:58

public financial statements of December

9:59

31st quite remarkable the insider

10:02

trading is pretty remarkable as well but

10:04

another thing that's pretty wild is uh

10:07

with the fact that you had 42 billion

10:10

dollars of cash withdrawn in just one

10:14

day from Silicon Valley Bank that's

10:16

pretty remarkable but on top of that

10:18

apparently somewhere around a 3.3

10:21

billion dollars of the assets backing

10:26

usdc

10:29

are at Silicon Valley Bank and as a

10:31

result now you've got what looks like a

10:34

a d-peg occurring on usdc because people

10:36

are questioning how many how much cash

10:38

is actually available to back uh the

10:41

stablecoin usdc which is kind of wild

10:43

because I don't think anybody would have

10:45

ever thought that oh my gosh usdc would

10:48

go before tether goes everybody always

10:50

makes fun of tether but it's pretty

10:51

remarkable that usdc right now is the

10:54

one that's in deepeg mode look at this

10:57

91.3 cents is where it sits right now

10:59

down 8.76 now in case you're not

11:02

familiar with stable coins this is bad

11:04

this is an example of an unstable coin

11:06

and I mean In fairness it lost its

11:09

backing potentially at least some of its

11:11

backing you know you've got about what a

11:12

33 billion dollar market cap over here

11:14

for usdc you've got about 3.3 billion

11:18

dollars potentially that are evaporating

11:20

so the market seems to be making that

11:22

sort of adjustment now a lot of people

11:24

are trying to Arbitrage play this in

11:26

fact yesterday tether was was sitting at

11:28

1.0 seven dollars in some D5 markets so

11:33

you could have literally bought it you

11:34

could have bought tether on something

11:36

like coinbase and then sold it for 1.07

11:38

for a seven Cent profit uh per Buck

11:41

which is insane a seven percent instant

11:42

Profit just playing Arbitrage in the D5

11:44

space so a lot of arbitrageurs have been

11:47

at work here uh and that is uh generally

11:49

arbitraging leads to a consistent one

11:53

dollar Peg but not when potentially ten

11:56

percent of the assets are oopsie

11:58

doopsies gone so that's pretty scary if

12:01

we go back here a little bit and just

12:03

look at uh Bitcoin Bitcoin actually

12:05

holding up through this and so is

12:07

ethereum in the last 24 hours both of

12:09

them roughly flat if anything net net

12:11

ethereum's up in the last 24 which is

12:13

pretty remarkable you've got uh busd has

12:17

been pretty stable along with uh tether

12:19

again at some point tether in the D5

12:21

markets was uh deep hagging but beyond

12:23

that hey uh usdc at 91 cents it's a red

12:28

flag it's it's shows you that stable

12:30

coins we we can't 100 trust stable coins

12:34

just yet this is why one of the things

12:36

that I talked about regularly since

12:38

January of 2022 is I think you're better

12:40

off in short-term treasuries if you're

12:42

looking to yield Farm you know six month

12:44

T bills basically then you are in stable

12:46

coins because the time you're going to

12:48

have stress in crypto is now during a

12:51

recessionary environment nobody knows

12:53

how the cards will fall but this is

12:56

where the cards are starting to fall now

12:58

you have these contagion risks as well

13:00

not just for crypto but you have these

13:02

contagion risks around what the CEO of Y

13:05

combinator is suggesting he was on CNBC

13:07

complaining about this idea that oh my

13:09

gosh we could end up seeing 10 years

13:14

essentially of of startups setback in

13:19

other words so many startups that are

13:21

potentially on the cusp of of working

13:22

towards profitability or launching new

13:24

products or Services might all be

13:26

getting set back and we don't know the

13:28

implications of all of these yet it but

13:29

think about it a lot of companies in

13:31

Silicon Valley provide apis that are the

13:33

foundation for a lot of different goods

13:35

and services that we use now we don't

13:37

know for example if stripe is affected

13:39

uh so far it doesn't seem like they are

13:41

they haven't said anything uh doesn't

13:42

mean they aren't though but let's just

13:44

say for example you uh use stripe to

13:47

check out on Shopify uh that is you're a

13:49

merchant and you use stripe and all of

13:51

your Ecom stores what if all of a sudden

13:53

stripe lost like Roku 25 of its capital

13:56

and they had to freeze some of their

13:58

their you know they couldn't pay some of

13:59

their bills and some of their servers

14:01

froze you could see how this sort of

14:02

contagion can spread through because now

14:04

all of a sudden the apis break for

14:06

processing payments all of a sudden that

14:08

now you have Shopify stores breaking all

14:10

of a sudden now you're lowering GDP

14:12

because everything's basically Frozen

14:13

and it's a wall you lose a few days you

14:16

can really start pushing the economy

14:18

into an actual recession because you're

14:19

robbing the market of GDP

14:22

kind of crazy so that's something to

14:24

think about I mean really you could take

14:26

our our annual GDP and divide it by

14:29

about 365 and and you can find that okay

14:32

yeah we've we've got you know somewhere

14:34

around uh 65 billion bucks a day of GDP

14:38

so every single day is worth a lot of

14:41

goods and service at Dallas uh so you

14:44

could really start breaking the economy

14:46

pretty quickly because it doesn't take

14:47

many of those days not obviously that

14:49

the entire economy would go to zero on

14:51

those days but it doesn't take many of

14:52

those days to be shaved off because

14:54

things are broken uh to potentially

14:56

where you're not recouping that when

14:57

things are repaired again and does that

14:59

then potentially lead to other smaller

15:01

bank failures uh whether that's a first

15:02

Republic or Pacific Bank or you know

15:05

these are companies that are seeing

15:06

their stocks plummet because of this

15:08

fear that oh the contagion is going to

15:10

take them out as well now the hope is

15:12

that FDI receivership solves this on

15:14

Monday that is hope uh personally I

15:17

don't think hope is an investing

15:18

strategy but the idea is that I mean

15:20

it's all you have right now if you're

15:22

affected by by Silicon Valley Bank the

15:24

idea is that on Monday when the bank

15:26

goes into receivership hopefully FDIC is

15:28

basically sort of a bailout mechanism

15:31

for banks because Venture capitalists

15:34

specifically people like David Sachs are

15:36

freaking out and the reason they're

15:37

freaking out is well partially in part

15:40

because somebody like David Sachs does

15:42

support a lot of startups that's their

15:45

business right the all-in Pod these

15:47

these folks they work regularly with

15:49

Venture uh as Venture capitalists for

15:52

and in the private Equity markets for

15:54

startups and if all of a sudden a lot of

15:56

their companies are now getting reamed

15:58

or potentially risking bankruptcy that's

16:00

bad for them but for them they are

16:02

making these strong arguments right now

16:04

that hey the FED needs to come in the

16:06

banks need to come in and bail out or or

16:09

the Federal Reserve Banks and the larger

16:11

Banks need to come out come in

16:13

potentially even the government and bail

16:14

out Silicon Valley Bank or other banks

16:17

that are potentially at risk to prevent

16:19

everybody from panicking I mean ideally

16:22

if this could just end up being look

16:24

Silicon Valley Bank went under much like

16:25

an FTX it went under it's fine it

16:28

doesn't take anything else with it fine

16:30

of course with FTX it took a lot of

16:32

things with it block VI Voyager Genesis

16:35

a lot of companies got destroyed because

16:37

FTX went under and the fear is that

16:39

similar kind of Destruction could happen

16:41

here and so this argument that's being

16:43

made is hey you know why not just make

16:46

uh have FDIC come in bail everyone out

16:50

and give people the faith that uh we are

16:54

not going to end up having more Bank

16:56

runs that's the idea right uh because

16:59

after all the last thing people want is

17:01

the fear that uh oh if it can happen to

17:04

Silicon Valley Bank the largest bank the

17:06

biggest bank failure now since 20 uh or

17:09

2008 well then it could happen uh to to

17:12

any local bank any Regional Bank now

17:15

when I uh when I was at a dinner

17:17

yesterday with Kathy Wood I asked her

17:19

opinion on this because I one of the big

17:22

concern that I have is it's not just the

17:24

contagion that it could spread to these

17:26

other Banks it's also the fact that

17:28

Silicon Valley Bank probably has to sell

17:30

somewhere around 80 billion dollars and

17:33

available for sale Securities and held

17:36

to maturity Securities both those

17:38

together

17:39

yikes because here's the thing if you

17:41

have available for sale Securities

17:43

that's one thing that was only about

17:45

maybe 10 15 of the balance sheet of

17:47

Silicon Valley Bank you take a loss on

17:49

those as they did they took their 1.5

17:51

billion dollar write down they tried to

17:52

raise some money whatever uh and then

17:55

that way you raise some Capital but the

17:57

real issue becomes uh oh what happens

17:59

when you take those hell to maturity

18:01

Securities you weren't thinking about

18:02

selling but now FDIC comes in it starts

18:06

liquidating those bonds well you could

18:08

see a total of somewhere around 80

18:10

billion mortgage-backed Securities hit

18:13

the market now how does that affect you

18:16

as an individual well technically right

18:18

now it's creating so much fear that a

18:21

lot of folks believe uh oh well that's

18:23

it the federal reserve's terminal rate

18:25

is going to come down rate expectations

18:27

are being cut we went from 5.65 to

18:29

somewhere around 5.29 now all of a

18:32

sudden we're pricing in a rate cut in

18:34

December again the bond market is

18:36

literally pricing in a rate cut in

18:37

December so you saw this massive

18:39

collapse of Treasury yields yesterday I

18:42

think the 10-year treasury was down to

18:43

the tune of 21 bips which is just insane

18:46

yeah 21.9 bips down back to 3.7 we were

18:49

just at 4.1 a week and a half ago so

18:53

this insane drop in yields which some

18:55

folks are saying oh well I mean that's

18:57

good for Real Estate right that's going

18:58

to drive mortgage rates down not

18:59

necessarily because even though usually

19:01

mortgage rates align with the 10-year

19:03

Treasury and are generally in alignment

19:06

so the 10-year goes up the mortgage

19:08

rates go up right 10-year goes down

19:09

mortgage rates go down but wait a minute

19:10

if all of a sudden you have 80 billion

19:13

dollars of commercial and mortgage and

19:15

residential mortgage-backed Securities

19:16

that have to get dumped you could

19:18

actually see the value of those bonds

19:19

plummet which drives the yields up for

19:21

mortgage-backed Securities which could

19:23

potentially actually drive up uh

19:26

mortgage rates for for uh new home or

19:29

commercial buyers or even variable

19:30

interest rate loans and that is called

19:32

the widening of the spread between the

19:35

10-year and what mortgage rates actually

19:37

are usually they get to a point of

19:39

alignment and there's a set spread but

19:41

if that spread widens you could actually

19:43

see higher real estate rates while you

19:45

have lower mortgage rates because all of

19:46

a sudden people aren't wanting to touch

19:48

commercial or residential

19:50

mortgage-backed Securities anymore now

19:52

when I was at dinner with Kathy Wood I

19:54

asked her specifically I go isn't there

19:56

a risk that the largest eight Banks

19:59

which the largest I specifically asked

20:01

about the largest eight because as we've

20:03

researched and talked about before the

20:04

largest eight Banks go undergo the

20:07

strongest and most stringent stress

20:10

tests at the Federal Reserve JPMorgan

20:12

City Wells Fargo Goldman uh Bank of

20:15

America right these sorts of banks HSBC

20:17

they go under the most severe and

20:21

scrutinizing stress tests from the

20:23

Federal Reserve and so I asked Kathy I

20:26

said hey is is it not a risk that these

20:29

larger Banks potentially even in the

20:32

stress tests don't actually have the

20:34

appropriate write Downs made in the

20:36

stress test for cmbs and and MBS

20:39

mortgage Securities and Kathy had this

20:41

interesting point she said the thing is

20:44

after the Great Recession and our bazel

20:47

3 Financial requirements especially for

20:49

the biggest of the banks the biggest

20:50

banks right now only hold about seven

20:53

percent of commercial mortgage-backed

20:55

Securities and we specifically focus in

20:56

on Commercial mortgage-backed Securities

20:58

because we're thinking vacant offices

21:00

those are the ones getting hit the worst

21:01

right that's really where you get the

21:02

worst of the liquidation so uh she

21:05

mentioned that

21:06

larger Banks only hold about seven

21:09

percent of their balance sheet exposure

21:11

or have about seven percent exposure to

21:13

commercial mortgage-backed Securities

21:15

whereas smaller Regional Banks said

21:18

about 25 percent and one of the reasons

21:20

she said there was such a difference was

21:22

that because of the new requirements

21:24

maybe back in the past all banks sat

21:26

somewhere around 15 percent let's say

21:28

mortgage-backed Securities for

21:29

commercial uh but because of the new

21:31

requirements on on banks on the larger

21:34

eight at the largest eight you actually

21:36

saw their commercial mortgage-backed

21:37

security Holdings go down to about seven

21:39

percent on average uh whereas at the

21:41

small Regional Banks they picked up the

21:42

slack and they went up to about 25 so

21:45

potentially that contagion is worse for

21:48

regional Banks than it is for the big

21:49

Banks so Kathy's not a believer that

21:51

this is this is really an element of of

21:53

widespread contagion or some sort of

21:56

sort of systemic risk big believer that

21:58

the financial system is still extremely

22:00

sound I agree with her I just would not

22:03

be associated with smaller Banks right

22:05

now which I feel bad I feel bad for all

22:07

their smaller Banks but look when the

22:09

writing is on the wall and there's smoke

22:11

there's usually fire and so I would not

22:13

recommend keeping Too much exposure now

22:15

to small banks in fact I wouldn't even

22:18

want to rely on the FDIC limits now I

22:21

know a lot of people are like look FDIC

22:22

is great the reason you like FDIC is

22:25

because they're going to come in like at

22:26

least you have an FDIC unlike FTX right

22:28

but if you have an FDIC at least you can

22:31

have some form of essentially bailout

22:34

protection and get some of your money

22:36

back eventually hopefully that's right

22:38

away but we're not sure if it's actually

22:40

going to be right away so the big

22:42

question is okay how bad do things get

22:43

now Joe Biden did come out yesterday and

22:46

I thought this was really remarkable Joe

22:48

Biden came out yesterday and said

22:50

Kevin's course is on building your

22:52

wealth are phenomenal and you should

22:54

definitely use the same panties coupon

22:55

below before it expires next week it's

22:59

linked down below and you get lifetime

23:00

access to them so if you take the

23:02

programs and you're like man I really

23:04

have a question for Kevin on this I'll

23:05

ask him in the last streams or maybe he

23:07

can make a lecture on this which I do

23:09

regularly add new lectures you get

23:10

lifetime access to all of that check

23:12

that out down below but that's not

23:14

actually what Biden said what Biden

23:16

actually said on the same day is we're

23:18

having all these contagion fears is he

23:19

says I'm confident CPI will be in good

23:23

shape next week now I thought that was

23:25

really interesting because

23:27

Joe Biden doesn't typically come out and

23:31

give us a spoiler of what the inflation

23:34

report is going to look like on Tuesday

23:35

but Joe Biden literally just gave us a

23:38

spoiler and said he's confident CPI will

23:41

be in good shape next week now that

23:43

either it means one of two things if he

23:46

has no idea what the report is going to

23:47

show it could just be BS politics right

23:50

but he's going to look like a an idiot

23:53

if it comes in hot next week right

23:55

so I actually think it's more likely

23:57

that Joe Biden has a little bit of a

23:59

heads up in terms of what's going on in

24:00

the CPI report and the reason they might

24:04

be okay essentially pre-leaking some of

24:06

the CPI data to Biden is because if

24:08

Biden can come out and say hey CPI is

24:10

going to be good next week that actually

24:12

relaxes financial markets it buys

24:15

financial markets some time to stabilize

24:19

so it's actually a sort of a

24:21

manipulation of markets really but as

24:23

long as it's true it's great if we get

24:25

rug pulled on Tuesday well wow okay now

24:27

you just can't trust anything the

24:29

government says which I specifically

24:31

worded that line like that because you

24:32

should be skeptical skeptical about

24:34

everything the government says but

24:36

anyway

24:37

he is confident that CPI will be in good

24:40

shape next week that would be very

24:41

embarrassing if he would he comes out

24:44

and says that and he's wrong so I don't

24:46

think he would make that I don't think

24:47

he would make a statement if he didn't

24:49

know I think he I think he got a thumbs

24:51

up

24:52

and the reason he got a thumbs up is to

24:54

help the fed and banking Regulators

24:57

maintain some Financial stability

24:59

because the worst case scenario is not

25:03

oh the president just leaked CPI data

25:05

that's not the worst case scenario the

25:07

real worst case scenario is a real

25:09

financial crisis again

25:11

right that will lead to insane numbers

25:14

of job losses the recession like we

25:16

haven't seen for the last 14 15 years

25:18

Donald Trump will end up being right

25:20

remember what Donald Trump said when

25:22

during the 2020 election he says hey if

25:24

Biden gets in you're going to have

25:26

potentially a 1929 style recession

25:30

oops uh anyway

25:33

so that's that's potentially a positive

25:37

right and at least again we have FDIC I

25:40

can't understate that point compared to

25:41

uh in in crypto where when FTX collapsed

25:44

there was no protection the same is true

25:47

for stable coins they're really there

25:49

really isn't technically protection now

25:51

the idea is that maybe you get passed

25:53

through FDIC Insurance maybe but it's

25:56

not actually you that is FDIC insured

25:59

it's technically supposed to be the

26:00

deposits that are insured but again if

26:02

Circle has 3.3 billion dollars at

26:04

Silicon Valley Bank and Trust what are

26:06

they going to get 250 000 of FDIC

26:08

Insurance what a joke again a lot of

26:12

people uh and uh Wall Street types

26:14

clamoring for this idea that oh my gosh

26:17

we need to bail out we need to bail out

26:20

as soon as possible personally I'm

26:21

actually not the biggest believer that

26:23

that's the right move right now I think

26:25

that uh FDIC can can uh prove that it

26:29

could support Port its Mission which is

26:32

protecting people up to 250 000

26:34

unfortunately somewhere on 95 percent of

26:36

people uh that have deposits at uh

26:39

Silicon Valley Bank and Trust have more

26:40

than 250 000 of deposits uh that sucks

26:43

uh and then on top of that FDIC really

26:46

only has about 1.7 percent of the

26:48

liquidity in the banking system so if

26:50

you had a larger crisis in the banking

26:51

system you'd have a you'd have some

26:53

pretty big problems uh but uh and by the

26:55

way here's the screenshot of that uh

26:58

where where Circle also shows you in the

27:00

usdc reserve report uh that they hold

27:03

money not just at Silicon Valley Bank

27:05

but they also hold money ad look at that

27:08

folks silvergate bank now you might

27:10

remember because I covered silvergate

27:12

Bank two days in a row about three days

27:15

ago I covered silver uh silvergate and

27:18

basically the liquidation of silvergate

27:20

uh you know Silicon Valley bank took all

27:22

all the fun like it took all the story

27:24

and the excitement uh I mean it's so

27:26

exciting I started tweeting things like

27:27

this uh here's a picture of a Silicon

27:29

Valley Bank credit card and I tweeted

27:32

today I started paying all my bills

27:34

through this new buy now pay later firm

27:37

sorry I have to make stupid jokes

27:39

because it's fun uh but uh but anyway uh

27:42

you know another thing too is I was

27:44

looking at Robin Hood and they haven't

27:46

replied yet but I tweeted Robin Hood and

27:49

I tweeted them this picture I said which

27:50

banks are in your network and I said hey

27:52

I know your cash deposit sweeps are in

27:55

these Banks right here Goldman HSBC

27:57

Wells Fargo Citibank blah blah blah and

28:00

it says that as of this January 31st

28:03

2022 uh we we use these Banks and we

28:06

might change them it does say we'll let

28:08

you know in advance if we change them

28:09

but what if they forgot to change them

28:11

you know what what if all of a sudden

28:13

some of the brokerages like a wealth

28:15

front or an M1 Finance have uh um you

28:17

know potentially some exposure to these

28:20

companies we just we just don't know uh

28:22

so anyway here's just a screenshot

28:24

example of uh David sacks freaking out

28:26

where's Powell where's Yellen stop this

28:27

crisis now announced that all depositors

28:30

will be safe uh Place Silicon Valley

28:32

Bank with a top four Bank do this before

28:34

Monday open or there will be Contagion

28:37

and crisis will spread uh people in the

28:40

uh in the comments aren't very very

28:42

happy about that because when you get to

28:43

the comments you get people saying

28:45

things like this and and just so you

28:47

know when I like things on Twitter it's

28:48

not because I actually like it it's it's

28:49

just because I'm kind of curious I want

28:51

to get people's perspective look at this

28:53

one just incredible billionaires and

28:55

their corrupt cronies begging to get

28:57

bailed out by taxpayers and hard-working

28:59

Savers from their own Reckless

29:01

delusional stupidity after having dumped

29:03

the worst companies in history on them I

29:06

mean potentially a little extreme but

29:08

but you know it's it is interesting I

29:10

mean how quickly we're jumping into this

29:12

idea of oh let's uh let's quickly bail

29:14

out let's quickly bail out right uh and

29:16

in the past some of the Venture

29:17

capitalists that are now begging for

29:19

bailouts were actually anti-bailouts

29:21

during the covet era so you kind of have

29:24

a little bit of that um that irony going

29:26

on uh which is is kind of not surprising

29:29

because you know it's it's when you're

29:30

affected uh you're you're much more

29:33

interested in uh getting help than when

29:34

somebody else is affected right like you

29:36

care about losing your own money and not

29:38

so much about somebody else losing money

29:40

which is terrible but I mean quite

29:41

frankly it's the truth uh you know but

29:43

then you have people even tweeting stuff

29:44

like this here's somebody Bob Elliott he

29:46

says the U.S banking system is built on

29:48

the expectation that Equity involvement

29:49

holders except Bank economic risk and

29:52

depositors blah blah blah basically

29:53

saying like hey man like this is bad

29:56

like people people should you know do

29:58

really good due diligence and the

30:00

banking system is set up under the basis

30:02

that people do good due diligence of of

30:04

Banks and that's what makes the whole

30:06

system work and he literally said that

30:08

he says the word here that a financial

30:11

investors in Banks do the necessary

30:13

diligence to quantify the bank risk I I

30:16

wrote lost you at diligence because I

30:19

actually don't think most people on Wall

30:21

Street do a lot of actual fundamental

30:24

analysis there's a reason why in our

30:26

course member live streams almost on a

30:28

daily basis I do fundamental analysis

30:30

with everyone because it to me it's a

30:33

Lost Art In fact when uh when I had

30:35

dinner with Kathy Kathy would one of the

30:38

things she mentioned was how frustrated

30:40

she was that in 2015 she went to an ETF

30:43

conference and she's looking around like

30:45

where are all the Bloomberg terminals

30:47

where all the researchers and she's

30:50

right most people on Wall Street aren't

30:53

actually doing real fundamental due

30:56

diligence it's it seems like it's more

30:59

of a marketing game than it is one of

31:01

actual due diligence uh so I I thought

31:05

that was very interesting but but this

31:07

is the kind of stuff that you're seeing

31:08

in sort of the debates that you're

31:10

seeing online at the same time as you

31:13

have uh uh you know the the Insiders

31:16

essentially cashing out of their shares

31:18

and it's really scary but in my opinion

31:21

and I've reiterated this a few times now

31:23

but yesterday I mentioned uh oh gosh at

31:26

this point about 13 hours ago I

31:28

mentioned no sorry 25 hours ago I

31:30

mentioned that this collapse the near

31:33

collapse yesterday morning that now

31:34

collapse in my opinion increases the the

31:37

likelihood of not just a 25 BP hike but

31:40

I think there's a greater percent chance

31:41

that as long as CPI comes in good we

31:44

could be seeing a zero percent hike as a

31:46

greater percent chance than uh than the

31:49

50 BP High

31:51

that's my theory uh that is definitely

31:53

my theory someone here says DD was never

31:55

an art uh I think due diligence is

31:58

absolutely an art uh there there

32:00

fundamental analysis uh generally is

32:03

based on assumptions and uh and

32:07

assumptions are uh are different for

32:10

everybody right and so when you have

32:11

something that's different for everybody

32:12

they really are it really is an art and

32:16

so that's important to remember is that

32:17

when when one person looks at a

32:20

discounted cash flow uh State you know

32:22

analysis uh your assumptions going into

32:25

that are going to be vastly different

32:26

than somebody else's what are you using

32:28

for Opex is your operating leverage

32:30

increasing or decreasing what's your

32:31

Revenue growth what's your discount rate

32:33

I mean there is no

32:36

one size fits-all way to actually do due

32:40

diligence and I think that's where most

32:42

people just don't do any diligence which

32:43

is quite unfortunate uh somebody here

32:47

says is asking about my startup uh if

32:49

househack goes to two billion dollars as

32:51

a market cap well you get a house hike

32:53

tattoo sure

32:55

uh thank you for that uh anyway so

32:58

really really crazy uh stuff here with

33:01

with the Silicon Valley bang and uh

33:03

hopefully on Monday the contagion is

33:07

limited the last thing we want to hear

33:09

on Monday is that other banks are

33:11

starting to have issues but let me be

33:13

very clear okay and I'm not trying to

33:16

spread fear I am trying to be a business

33:20

person providing what I believe is a

33:24

reasonable suggestion

33:25

I would not have any of my money with a

33:28

smaller bank right now I would have all

33:30

of my money in a tier one Bank warranty

33:33

bills that's it t bills tier One Bank

33:37

that's it

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.