TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Hedge Funds *JUST FLIPPED* | The Great Reset

17m 23s2,896 words426 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

folks the 10-year treasury yield is

0:02

Going Bonkers again it's a knocking on

0:04

the door of four percent something we

0:06

haven't seen until after we got the

0:09

January hot data from an unseasonably

0:12

warm winter where a lot of retail sales

0:14

were being pulled forward the only

0:16

reason we dipped with the 10-year

0:18

Treasury and March was well of course

0:20

the banking crisis where we had a rapid

0:22

deceleration of uh interest rates uh and

0:25

then of course the time before that was

0:27

October November before the real

0:30

December sell-off that we saw on the

0:32

stock market where we had a four percent

0:34

10-year treasure yield in fact as I was

0:37

recording this this just popped from the

0:39

upper three uh nines to over four

0:42

percent so what's going on and why might

0:47

these yields be going up and what could

0:49

it mean for the stock market and is

0:51

there a giant irony happening I

0:54

personally believe there is so we'll

0:57

look a little bit at positioning but I'm

1:00

want you to think about logic here first

1:02

and then we'll get into some equity

1:04

research from uh Jeffries and some other

1:06

sources so let's think about logic first

1:09

what does it mean when a bond yield

1:12

Rises well usually when a bond yield

1:16

Rises what you have is you have more

1:19

people

1:20

selling that particular Bond then you

1:23

have people buying it so when you have

1:25

more selling you increase the yield

1:28

because the price is lower so if the

1:32

yield is constant and the price goes

1:34

down you get a higher percentage on your

1:36

money but why would people be selling

1:38

bonds well I have a theory I think

1:41

people might be selling bonds because

1:43

they're realizing they're under

1:46

allocated to stocks now that's actually

1:49

really interesting because it suggests a

1:52

reiteration of what we've seen in the

1:55

stock market over especially the last

1:57

six days with the s p where you get this

2:00

morning sell-off or or low and then you

2:03

rise into the close it seems to me

2:07

institutional investors are potentially

2:09

vastly mispositioned and every bit of

2:13

negative news is seen as an opportunity

2:15

to increase their positioning to

2:16

equities

2:18

and reduce their positioning to bonds

2:21

because even though you're getting a

2:22

nice juicy four or five percent yield on

2:25

the ten to two year treasure yields

2:27

you're missing out on the potential

2:29

returns of the stock market and most

2:32

institutional investors thought 2023 was

2:35

going to be horrible we were going to

2:37

have a Chinese re-inflation with the

2:40

Chinese reopening that was going to push

2:41

inflation up throughout the rest of the

2:43

world earnings were supposed to be the

2:45

worst and the stock market was supposed

2:46

to sell down even more as a result of

2:49

this wild earnings recession well we

2:53

didn't end up getting that kind of pain

2:55

in 2023 we got a substantially stronger

2:59

economy with stronger sales in January

3:01

stronger sales in February Powell

3:03

powelled howled powered through the

3:06

banking crisis potentially with the help

3:08

of Powell although that could reignite

3:10

as bond yields continue to rise you

3:12

actually put more stress on the banks so

3:14

you can see more of the fed's liquidity

3:16

facilities being tapped because because

3:18

of this and we have been right if you

3:20

look at the bank term funding program of

3:22

the Federal Reserve and we can pull up

3:24

charts by going to the St Louis fed on

3:27

that uh you can see that liquidity for

3:30

uh this facility has generally been

3:33

trending up let's zoom in on it here

3:35

really quick and here it is so you can

3:39

see here is the banking crisis in March

3:42

we shot up with our usage of this Bank

3:45

term funding program we kind of leveled

3:48

out but then come may as the 10-year

3:50

treasury started Rising again you

3:52

started seeing that pressure again now

3:54

we've started flattening again here in

3:56

just the last few weeks of June uh which

4:00

is good a sign of stability but what

4:03

could all of this actually mean going

4:06

forward and then what does Jeffrey say

4:08

well consider this for a moment if if it

4:11

is possible that you end up with a uh an

4:15

Institutional set that is under

4:17

allocated that is people are underweight

4:19

stocks which the Bank of America fund

4:21

manager survey told us hey we're

4:24

underweight stocks right Bank of America

4:26

fund survey said institutional fund

4:29

managers are underweight 32 percent on

4:32

their stocks

4:33

well then any dip opportunity is an

4:36

opportunity to buy and allocate and dump

4:39

bonds which would actually lead to an

4:41

environment and this is the crazy part

4:43

where you potentially have yields up

4:46

stocks up usually you don't have that

4:49

usually when yields are up stocks go

4:52

down

4:52

but now we're potentially in this

4:54

environment where yields are going up

4:55

stocks are going up because of this

4:57

rebalancing combined with obviously

5:00

where the FED has rates right now now

5:02

let's take a look at this Jeffries put

5:04

together a piece here and indicated that

5:06

looking at the msci hedge fund data as

5:09

of 430 April 30th this piece just came

5:13

out as well but this just came out uh

5:15

yesterday here July 5. these investors

5:17

increased their long position to 230

5:20

percent back above long-term averages

5:23

these investors look at this lowered

5:27

weight and bond proxies underweight

5:30

Group by over 10 percent now net short

5:33

real estate and utilities secular growth

5:36

was bumped to overweight so many

5:39

different types of Institutions here but

5:41

consider this you've got fund managers

5:44

which are your investment advisors so

5:47

these are your financial advisors

5:48

allocating money uh for people then you

5:51

have hedge funds so hedge funds are not

5:54

actually what I mean they can be but

5:57

they're usually not licensed financial

5:58

advisors they're just people who are

5:59

putting money together for accredited

6:01

investors you've kind of already started

6:03

to see that transition for hedge funds

6:05

they went from under allocated the

6:07

beginning of the year to starting to get

6:09

over allocated as soon as around the end

6:11

of April and that could have been one of

6:14

the reasons we've seen bond yields rise

6:16

up now you need to see fund managers

6:19

also play catch-up and I think people

6:22

are realizing that you just can't be uh

6:24

short equities right now or you can't be

6:26

under allocated and therefore you've got

6:28

here hedge funds raising their Equity

6:30

exposure back above long-term average

6:33

uh let's take a look at some of the

6:34

others here hedge funds move back to net

6:36

short and marginally shore on sort of

6:38

net short real estate marginally

6:39

shortened utilities I do want to mention

6:41

what this could mean for real estate by

6:43

the way when you have this sort of

6:45

environment by the way yields up stocks

6:47

up

6:48

you're actually going to create a very

6:50

interesting opportunity usually what's

6:53

going to happen is

6:55

stocks uh and uh well well Tino returns

6:58

for stocks Tina returns Tino returns is

7:02

there is no alternative and that

7:05

basically says everyone piles into

7:07

stocks there's a beauty in that

7:10

as real estate uh real estate rents

7:15

decline as they are uh real estate

7:18

becomes less desirable as mortgage rates

7:22

and yields rise guess what real estate

7:26

becomes

7:27

less desirable which means

7:30

much less competition and more

7:34

opportunity in real estate because every

7:37

Loser on Wall Street isn't trying to

7:39

understand real estate and just buy a

7:41

bunch of properties everywhere so in my

7:43

opinion this actually sets up fantastic

7:46

opportunities to ride stocks for a bit

7:51

uh and then get into real estate is

7:53

potentially more opportunities open up

7:55

over the next six months to a year

7:58

couple of years in that sort of window

8:00

that's sort of what I've been playing

8:02

and and sort of knocking on wood on

8:04

since January of 2022 the idea of

8:08

allocate to stocks before the PIV and

8:12

then real estate Lacks

8:14

so allocated to real estate after

8:16

kind of interesting so okay now let's

8:19

continue with this Jeffrey's piece

8:21

speaking of real estate by the way uh if

8:23

you want to Shadow me as I hunt for Real

8:24

Estate we brought back the shadowing

8:26

program link down below you can chat

8:28

with me and learn from me in person on

8:29

real estate uh and uh that's of course

8:33

or linked right next to the links for

8:34

the courses on building your wealth link

8:36

down below uh all right so continuing

8:38

with the Jeffrey's piece here so we

8:41

continue to track and write about our

8:43

version of fang plus called the sweet

8:46

16. as of the end of April hedge funds

8:49

took down their active weight to this

8:51

group and moved to a larger underweight

8:53

the underweight versus the S P 500

8:55

stands at 5 1 versus 3.3 percent the

8:59

month prior so in other words when

9:01

you're looking at the top 16 stocks even

9:04

though hedge funds have positioned in by

9:06

about April 30th in recent weeks you've

9:09

started to get back to a little bit

9:11

underweight you could see that

9:12

represented by this red line here it's

9:15

really as we kind of wrote here hedgies

9:17

are hit or miss with with you know Tech

9:19

basically they're not sure like do we

9:21

love it do we hate it where do we want

9:23

to be and so here's the zero percent

9:25

line if you see my little squiggly laser

9:27

right there and when you get this red

9:29

line here going under that zero line

9:32

right there on the right you're getting

9:34

that under allocation again uh which is

9:38

actually fantastic because it just

9:39

reiterates why we're potentially seeing

9:42

these runs of the stock market into the

9:44

close remember stocks uh at least the S

9:47

P 500 has run into the close Six Days In

9:50

the row now and we haven't seen that

9:53

since October of 2021 it's usually a

9:56

sign of I mean I hate to use this phrase

9:58

but it might be accurate here

10:00

institutional fomo where you're kind of

10:02

just getting this allocation because

10:04

they realize they've oopsie dupe seed

10:06

right and been misallocated hedge funds

10:10

got less defensive and cut their

10:12

exposure to bond proxies by almost five

10:14

percent underweight Bond proxies now

10:17

stands at 10.2 percent however the

10:18

historical average is higher than 11. in

10:21

other words they're historically more

10:23

underweight which means there's more

10:25

bonds selling to do and more allocating

10:28

to stocks to do now uh Augustine here in

10:33

the chat actually asks a good question

10:34

how does this relate to the 10-2 yield

10:37

curve okay so I said something mean

10:40

yesterday about economists and the tend

10:44

to yield curve and it could end up like

10:46

biting me in the butt but I thought it

10:48

was funny I don't know maybe other

10:49

people didn't think it was funny but

10:51

I'll I'll show you this tweet and it

10:53

relates to answering your question which

10:54

I think is actually a very valid

10:55

question so first I quote tweeted this

10:58

person they said this person says quote

11:00

son I got a new job Mom got a raise

11:05

we have more cash in the bank

11:08

gas prices are falling my 401k is up

11:11

your 529 College savings plan is up and

11:14

my company is expanding things to

11:16

Growing profits but Sun

11:19

we're not going to Disney World

11:22

because the yield curve is inverted

11:24

said nobody ever and I thought it was a

11:28

great comment because the truth is the

11:31

biggest bear argument right now is the

11:33

tend to yield curve this idea that oh my

11:37

gosh you know but the yield curve is

11:39

inverting uh the yield curve being

11:41

inverted I know that sounds complicated

11:43

but it's really not let me show you how

11:45

simple it is to see that the yield curve

11:47

is inverted you ready you go here search

11:49

you put in 10-year so all I'm doing is

11:51

going to cnbc.com I put a 10-year on one

11:54

Tab and then I put in two year on the

11:57

other Tab and so what do you do right

11:59

here under 10 year you see okay we're at

12:01

four percent okay that's easy math here

12:03

on the two year you see you're at five

12:05

percent what's the difference about one

12:08

percent because usually you get paid

12:11

more for committing your money for

12:13

longer

12:14

this is the opposite of what you would

12:15

expect you would expect the 10-year to

12:18

be higher and the two year to be shorter

12:19

or or lower but it's not hence you have

12:22

an inversion

12:24

the there are two potential explanations

12:26

for this one or screw it and we're going

12:29

into a deep dark recession like history

12:30

has predicted although there have been

12:32

false flags on this

12:34

like if you if you look at the history

12:36

of the inverted yield curve every time

12:38

there has been a recession you've had an

12:40

inversion of the yield curve but not

12:42

every time you've had an inversion have

12:43

you had a recession

12:45

anyway

12:46

uh the second possible explanation is

12:50

that because inflation is high now

12:52

people are demanding a higher a higher

12:56

basically yield in order to commit to

12:58

two-year treasuries now because they

13:00

want to be paid more now uh and they

13:02

realize that high inflation isn't going

13:04

to last long so they're willing to take

13:06

slightly less on the longer duration

13:08

Bond because inflation is expected to go

13:12

down

13:13

so anyway I ended up replying to this I

13:16

quote tweeted this uh it wasn't as

13:18

popular as I thought I thought it was

13:19

funny but it wasn't I don't know I said

13:22

hence why economists have predicted 10

13:24

out of the last two recessions the

13:26

actual 10-2 inversion which is basically

13:29

to say that maybe the real 10-2

13:31

inversion is the fact that we're

13:32

predicting more recessions than we

13:34

actually get

13:35

anyway so point of all this is there is

13:39

a logical explanation to the 10 to yield

13:41

curve yes it is it is a very legitimate

13:45

bearish argument and maybe maybe you

13:49

know it's it's wrong to say that the

13:51

10-2 yield curve is uh is completely uh

13:55

wrong uh and I don't want to suggest

13:57

that it's completely wrong but I'm just

13:59

saying

14:00

there is a logical explanation as well

14:02

which is scary because it it makes sense

14:05

that if you're under allocated bonds

14:08

you start dumping Bonds in a high

14:10

interest rate regime for anybody to buy

14:12

the two-year you need to see yields

14:13

continue to go up above the tenure

14:16

and then as people are dumping bonds

14:18

they're actually throwing money into

14:20

stocks because stocks are rising again

14:21

and we're realizing even though earnings

14:24

estimates have been adjusted down things

14:26

just aren't as bad as they were expected

14:28

to be in 2022. the economy just

14:31

continues to show signs of strength

14:34

anyway so so uh okay a little bit more

14:38

on the uh the hedge funds here

14:40

so I want to see where they're crowded

14:42

here we go Uber crowded names loved by

14:45

hedge funds this is the order

14:48

of crowded names for hedge funds meta

14:51

Microsoft Nvidia Amazon Visa Adobe

14:54

Netflix evidence health McDonald's Lulu

14:58

uh Lind

15:01

Google booking Holdings AMD Pepsi

15:04

Salesforce PayPal uh intuitive Procter

15:07

Gamble in United Health

15:08

notice no Tesla no Tesla no apple

15:13

oh that's really interesting actually

15:14

I'll make a little note of that Tesla

15:17

Apple not here uh you also don't have

15:20

your TSM your asml oh by the way I had

15:24

the honor of driving

15:26

um uh to the TSM plant yesterday which

15:29

was pretty cool in Phoenix we were

15:32

looking at real estate

15:33

and uh studying the rental market there

15:36

uh and uh here's the Phoenix Arizona

15:39

plant as of yesterday I was talking

15:41

about how it's really crazy that the

15:43

inflation reduction Act is probably

15:44

paying like 25 to 30 percent of all this

15:46

which is remarkable I actually ended up

15:48

flying over the plant as well which is

15:50

also really cool uh so we kind of got a

15:53

low-ish fly over the plan I mean that's

15:55

probably what 4 000 feet or whatever

15:56

which is pretty cool uh and but anyway

15:59

yeah that was that was pretty awesome so

16:01

uh so point of all of this is really

16:04

well here one more chart and then bottom

16:06

line this so infotech net positioning

16:09

you can see here again I will draw a

16:12

line at the zero percent so you could

16:14

see it a little bit easier you can see

16:17

that negative that underweight

16:18

positioning there by hedge funds again

16:20

uh in Tech and you can see it oscillates

16:24

a lot you know but that's what hedge

16:26

funds do they trade a lot but anyway

16:28

point of this is this Jeffrey's piece

16:32

reiterates

16:34

that funds are under allocated stocks

16:38

and when they allocate more to stocks

16:40

what do they do they dump bonds what

16:43

happens when you dump bonds you jack up

16:46

the yield curve and it really reiterates

16:49

essentially exactly what we're seeing

16:51

just pretty remarkable so anyway that

16:55

gives us a thought about yield curve and

16:58

stocks now I want you to know this when

17:01

it comes to AI time is what's going to

17:04

make you money and if you can prove that

17:07

value to an employer you'll always be

17:09

able to be employed so this is another

17:12

way of making sure that you don't get

17:14

replaced but

17:15

[Music]

17:19

oh

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.