TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Prepare for the Fed WEDNESDAY | WHAT TO EXPECT.

13m 33s2,450 words177 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Hey, tomorrow at 11:00 a.m. California time, we will be getting a Federal

0:04

Reserve statement on whether or not they are going to reduce rates. And then at

0:08

11:30, we will get the Federal Reserve press conference. In this video, I'm

0:12

going to give you a presentation of what to expect. So, first things first,

0:15

Barclays is expecting no rate cut. It's also worth remembering that uh and I

0:19

mean the market broadly is expecting no rate cut either. This is pretty much the

0:23

expectation at this point. It's worth knowing as well though that tomorrow's

0:26

meeting will not have a summary of economic projections. So, we're not

0:30

really going to get any kind of adjustment on that SCP. However, I'd

0:34

like to note that Drum Powell often likes to distance himself uh from the

0:40

SCP after uh the SCP release meeting. Sometimes he even does during the

0:47

meeting, the SCP comes out. uh and so what could happen uh is you could end up

0:52

seeing uh a sort of talk down of the last summary of economic projections

0:58

that we got in March. Now the last projections materials are right here and

1:03

what we saw last time was that at the snapshot in time we thought for 2025 we

1:10

would end up getting GDP to sit around 1.7%.

1:14

I'm very confident Jerome Powell was going to get asked about the likelihood

1:18

of whether or not there'd be any difference in GDP projections or the

1:22

unemployment rate especially since we just had the Q1 GDP numbers come in very

1:28

very low.3%. We also had the Atlanta Fed real

1:33

GDP indicator suggesting even exports, gold exports excluded that we had a

1:38

substantially low uh data set for Q1 that would be suggestive of a slowly

1:43

moving economy. Presently the Atlanta Fed real GDP number is higher though, so

1:49

who knows? Maybe it'll average out. Right now the Atlanta Fed is showing

1:52

about 2.2% on a GDP, you know, basis for Q2.

1:58

So maybe Jerome Powell might give us a hint that hey, you know, the economy is

2:03

going to continue to move in line with our expectations of the last SEP. If he

2:08

says that, that's actually going to be a bullish move. So I would watch for that

2:12

potential bullishness because you kind of you like these SEP numbers are not

2:18

that bad. 4.4% unemployment then 43 43 for the next two years. 42 in the long

2:23

run. This is no problem at all. Now, when you start seeing a half percentage

2:28

rise in the unemployment rate from where we are, you get back to sort of the

2:31

fears about triggering the SOM rule, you did have one individual here project 47,

2:37

but I don't think we're actually in a place where JPAL is going to suggest,

2:41

hey, any of this seems to be weakening. If anything, I would expect that he

2:46

might mention that inflation could be higher in 2025 than previously expected.

2:50

But you'll notice they already built that into their summary of economic

2:54

projections last time uh during the March meeting and that mind you was

2:59

before liberation day. Now since then we have heard Jerome Powell say that

3:05

tariffs have come out to be a lot larger than expected. So, we would anticipate

3:10

that maybe if uh the board was going to revise their SEP or when they come out

3:15

with their new SEP next uh month in June that this number here will be higher.

3:21

But so far, it doesn't seem like the Fed is seeing any real signs of damage in

3:26

the hard data. And I don't think we're going to get a POW tomorrow that really

3:30

indicates any concern. Now, don't get me wrong, we're starting to see

3:34

highfrequency data, like in the video we talked about this morning, starting to

3:37

roll over, and I encourage you to watch that. But let's keep going with what

3:41

we've got from Barclays here. So, Barclay suggests they expect the May

3:47

FOMC statement to acknowledge that near-term inflation expectations have

3:52

moved up, but that longer term has remained relatively anchored. Uh, and

3:57

that's a good thing. This is usually calculated or or you know sort of read

4:00

off market expectations through inflation uh break even estimates. And

4:04

if you jump into uh what BNY suggests, BNY has their piece right here. Market

4:11

pricing agrees with no cut for tomorrow, maybe a 27% chance for June and a 64%

4:18

chance for July. But those longerterm inflation expectations are still very

4:22

well behaved. And if this remains to be the case by the end of July, that's when

4:28

we could potentially see a cut. Why? Because of a rollover in the jobs

4:32

market. So in other words, we could pay attention to inflation expectations as

4:37

short-term get a bump in the road. Longer term stable. As long as we remain

4:42

stable, maybe by July unemployment data ends up rolling over. And that's the big

4:48

red flag. But we're just not seeing any of that data yet. In fact, obviously the

4:51

April numbers beat really well. We were expecting 13,000 jobs. We got

4:56

117,000. Uh, mind you, this was the this survey was taken the week after

5:01

Liberation Day. So, it might not fully encompass the damage yet of tariffs uh

5:07

and sort of the length that tariffs have been going on. You know, we're we're now

5:11

celebrating what six u May 6th. We're celebrating uh essentially, you know, a

5:17

full month here post liberation day of tariffs. And so far, we don't have a

5:23

single deal yet. There is talk, mind you, about a deal with the United

5:26

Kingdom. But what's really interesting about this talk with the United Kingdom

5:30

is this idea that we're only going to see some limited maybe lifting of auto

5:36

part tariffs or auto tariffs along with some quotas. But there's no talk in the

5:43

UK trade deal about removing anything with regard to reciprocal tariffs. So in

5:50

other words, even if we get this sort of deal on autotos and auto parts or steel

5:57

and aluminum, we're still having issues on pharmaceuticals, reciprocal tariffs,

6:01

and the larger tariff sets on, you know, basically all other goods other than

6:06

cars and steel, which is interesting because now this is being called

6:11

potentially at hopefully the next and first big trade deal that Trump's going

6:15

to get to announce. but it's really just going to, you know, if this is what it

6:18

ends up being, address part of the issues that we're facing, which isn't

6:22

really great. Uh, so, you know, we've got this view here from BNY that by the

6:29

time June data is published, the jobs outlook will start to deteriorate

6:34

clearly. And I think this actually sets up a potential issue when you get into

6:39

mid June because you're going to have a lot of folks that will start clamoring

6:42

for the Federal Reserve to cut rates. And it's possible that they will,

6:49

but my guess is they're going to want a full quarter of inflation data before

6:54

being willing to respond uh to these cuts. They're also going to want to see

6:59

will Doge actually create any inflation. I know that second one is going to sound

7:03

a little weird. We'll talk about that in just a moment. But think about this. For

7:08

you to actually get three full months of inflation data, you're looking at the

7:12

May inflation report, the June inflation report, and the July inflation report.

7:17

All right, cool. So, when do we get the July inflation report? Well, we can go

7:21

to the CPI schedule of releases. And the July inflation report is expected to

7:27

come out right here, August 12th. All right,

7:31

great. So that means the earliest you would have three months of data for the

7:36

Fed is probably going to be September. So you could Google, we'll go to FOMC

7:43

schedule. Jump back in here. FOMC schedule. Uh you could see we're not

7:49

going to have a Fed meeting in August at all. So, by the time you get three full

7:54

months of inflation data for the Federal Reserve, you're actually going to have

7:57

to wait until September to realistically price in uh one of your first reactions.

8:03

And see, the Federal Reserve is of the mindset that they can cut rates very

8:06

rapidly. So, who knows, maybe you even get a 50 basis point cut here. But the

8:11

problem is this quarter right here, May, June, July, is where we'll probably

8:16

start seeing unemployment rise. Shorter term inflation expectations continue to

8:21

rise. and a Fed that does nothing. And when a Fed does nothing or when the Fed

8:25

does nothing, people get very nervous. They're like, "Oh, no. This this is

8:29

bad." Now, obviously, right now, we expect the Federal Reserve is going to

8:33

be in no rush. And that's fine. But once we get closer to actually seeing some of

8:37

those early job cuts, people are going to be really nervous, like, why is the

8:40

Fed not cutting it? So, we're going to wait for a quarter of data. We've seen

8:44

that in their behavior at the beginning of 2024 when they were talking about Q1.

8:47

Oh, you know, one month doesn't make a trend. uh you know, one quarter was a

8:51

little elevated. We're willing to wait a little longer. That's going to be a risk

8:55

factor. So, the Fed being slow here is probably the biggest risk. And I think

9:00

I'm going to be looking for clues in terms of how many inflation reports

9:04

Jerome Powell really wants to look for to see that tariff impact. I don't think

9:08

he'll give us an answer because it's likely just way too soon to tell. But

9:12

when you think about it, logically, if you were the Fed chairperson, yeah,

9:16

you're probably not going to desire to react until September, which means again

9:21

that June, July period, August even with with no Fed meeting at all could be a

9:26

little nasty. Now, on top of that, you know, there are articles circulating

9:30

right now that Doge isn't actually saving money. Uh that Doge might

9:34

actually end up costing us money, that, you know, was supposed to be a $2

9:38

trillion goal. Now then it was a 1 trillion and you know then it'll go down

9:42

to savings of so far only 150 billion and a lot of that was sort of cutting

9:46

DEI expenses and basically cutting programs not necessarily finding waste

9:51

fraud and abuse although some will say DEI programs are are wasteful but not

9:56

necessarily fraudulent that's fine but what's interesting uh you know obviously

10:00

this is just somebody's opinion that Doge could end up costing more money. I

10:04

think what they're really doing is they're just saying there's, you know,

10:06

government spending has just continued to skyrocket and deficits are rising and

10:11

if we walk into a recession, deficits will rise even more. So, we'll have more

10:15

debt rather than less. I mean, I always think it's good, at least somebody's

10:19

trying to bring efficiency uh to the government, which I'm a big fan of. But

10:23

one thing that is interesting that I hadn't considered before was this right

10:27

here. The downside to DOA's valley of tears, a demoralized workforce and bad

10:33

headlines about non-existent savings that can be presented as a win. So, in

10:38

other words, this potential demoralization of government workers uh

10:44

in terms of hey, your your job isn't safe. You know, why work hard? You're

10:49

expendable. Nobody really knows what that potentially is going to entail

10:54

longer term. But if we do see a decline in government productivity, it is also

10:59

possible that GDP declines because of that, keeping in mind that government

11:04

spending is part of our gross domestic product because it enables money to

11:08

circulate through an American economy. Just like when we trade with China, I

11:12

thought it was really interesting. TS Lombard had a great piece this morning.

11:15

Maybe I can pull it up where they show that when we buy things from China, 50%

11:21

of the money that goes to basically Chinese companies in exchange for those

11:26

imports uh ends up in America. Again, take a look at this. So, of the money

11:32

that's spent on Chinese goods, it's actually

11:35

55.9% stays in America, which is the highest of all of the other countries

11:40

that we would trade with or trade with. you know, Japan, Canada, Mexico, Euro

11:44

era or whatever. Uh, which is fascinating because it really suggests

11:47

that hey, that a lot of that money can stay here. See, they give an example.

11:52

When you buy a $100 pair of Nike sneakers made in Asia, only 25 of its

11:56

costs goes to the Asian factory that manufactures the shoes. The remaining 75

12:01

is spent in the following ways. 350 to ship it from Asia to the United States.

12:06

2150 goes to Nike to cover its design, marketing profits, and expenses. most of

12:10

those being US expenses and the rema, you know, US-based costs like Nike

12:14

employees and stuff. And the remaining $50 goes to the US retailer that pays

12:18

for the transportation of the sneakers inside the United States, pays the

12:21

workers to sell it at the retail locations, uh, insurance, rental space,

12:26

blah blah blah blah blah, whatever. So, it's kind of interesting like when when

12:29

you think about, oh my gosh, I'm buying this $100 shoe made in China. Really,

12:33

only 25 bucks of it is going to to, you know, China. Uh obviously TS Lombard

12:39

here says outside of the shoe example in aggregate it's closer to 44%. Uh but on

12:44

the shoe example very little actually ends up in China relative to how much

12:47

goes to support wages in American service providers here. I think all of

12:52

this is is quite fascinating data and uh creates very very cool perspective. So

12:57

uh anyway my take on the Fed tomorrow and some other updates. Thanks so much

13:01

for watching and we'll see y'all tomorrow. We'll be live for it. Uh make

13:05

sure to come join. I look forward to seeing you there. Thanks so much for

13:08

watching. As always, remember nonacredited round for House Hack is

13:11

open. Go to house hack.com to learn more. Thanks so much for watching. We'll

13:15

see you soon in the next. Why not advertise these things that you told us

13:17

here? I feel like nobody else knows about this. We'll we'll try a little

13:20

advertising and see how it goes. Congratulations, man. You have done so

13:23

much. People love you. People look up to you. Kevin Praath there, financial

13:26

analyst and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.