TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Coming Economic Collapse & Crash | George Gammon.

1h 5m 34s12,310 words1,696 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

it doesn't come with more government it

0:02

comes with less government denied denied

0:04

denied this is at 0% interest rates it's

0:06

distorting the ability to create more

0:09

goods and services is instead of going

0:11

long the 10-year he actually went long

0:14

with leverage on the 2-year I never

0:16

tried to figure out price Direction

0:17

never ever ever the information that

0:19

he's getting that he is not sharing with

0:21

the general public is not good he risks

0:23

re acceleration inflation he also risks

0:26

being Arthur Burns he h the nail on the

0:28

head it's it's all about Insider

0:29

information

0:31

welcome back to another episode of the

0:32

meet Kevin show today we have the honor

0:34

of interviewing and confronting George

0:37

thank you so much for being here you

0:39

know George was there for me when I was

0:41

in Cordon California trying to fight

0:43

Governor Gavin and you were behind the

0:45

scenes in The Green Room ready to

0:47

testify for me that's right thank you

0:48

for that no problem but now you have a

0:51

big warning and thank you something

0:53

weird is happening right now in the

0:54

economy and you just went live on it

0:57

catch us up what's what's going on well

1:00

it's all about something called the

1:01

yield curve so uh for your viewers I'm

1:04

sure they're probably somewhat familiar

1:06

with this but we look at the the

1:08

treasuries and you've got the one Monon

1:10

Treasury and you that goes all the way

1:12

out to a 30-year treasury so this is

1:14

what we would call the treasury curve

1:17

and what we have seen historically is

1:19

when it when it inverts what that means

1:22

is the long-term interest rates are

1:25

actually lower than short-term interest

1:27

rates which is the opposite of what they

1:30

should be right because if I'm going to

1:32

lend you $1,000 for two weeks sure I'm

1:36

going to charge you a much lower

1:37

interest rate I might even do it for

1:38

free right and unless compare that to if

1:41

I'm lending you that ,000 for 30 years

1:44

well now of a sudden I got a ton of risk

1:45

I've got inflation risk I've got uh

1:48

counterparty risk and therefore I'm

1:50

going to charge you a much higher

1:51

interest rate so that's why you almost

1:53

always see longer term interest rates

1:56

much higher right it's just like if you

1:58

go to the bank and you have an

2:00

adjustable rate mortgage okay that's

2:02

going to be a lower interest rate than

2:04

if you have a fixed rate mortgage over

2:06

30 years it's the exact same concept

2:08

okay so what happens is when the 10-year

2:11

treasury yield goes lower than the

2:15

2-year treasury yield let's say this has

2:18

always been a red flag and what we've

2:21

seen going back to 1950 is almost every

2:24

single time that you get an inversion it

2:27

precedes a recession or in today's terms

2:30

a hard Landing how did they pull that

2:32

off in 19 we had the inversion in 19 but

2:35

the bond market couldn't have predicted

2:37

covid so would there just have been

2:39

another recession I think it did wow

2:42

yeah so there there's two there's two

2:44

ways of looking at that but but this is

2:45

a great point because the question

2:47

becomes okay if the inversion of the

2:49

curve has been so accurate how yeah H H

2:54

how has it been this accurate right

2:56

right and so I think you hit the nail on

2:58

the head it's it's all about Insider

3:00

information oh my gosh and so I just

3:02

talked to uh Jeff Snyder about this and

3:05

it makes a lot of sense and I think that

3:06

we can use Kenny maoy who is just here

3:09

as a perfect example so let's walk

3:11

through this thought experiment right in

3:13

2019 the curve inverted in August yeah

3:16

yeah it was like the sumary yeah right

3:18

so if you look at now all the reports of

3:20

when we likely got that leak out of

3:24

Wuhan the lab if that's what happened

3:26

I'm trying to keep it trying to keep it

3:28

YouTube friendly here come on man it it

3:30

was the B

3:31

bro right but assuming that that

3:34

happened reports now and even reports

3:37

that have come out by the the

3:38

politicians in the government Peg that

3:41

to August of 2019 so let's just think

3:45

this through okay and this is way I

3:46

thought like December and and no no

3:49

people were getting sick then already in

3:50

China you're right right because they

3:52

had those game the military games

3:54

remember the military games was

3:55

supposedly the first you know super

3:58

spreader event if you want to call it

3:59

that so would have had to come out prior

4:02

to that which you Peg it right around

4:04

August or so so and you know this well

4:07

from you know your attempt in in

4:09

politics there is that it's it's all

4:11

about insiders and they have access

4:14

Gavin Nome you we talked about this

4:15

earlier today he has access to all the

4:17

bankers in uh in California is that F

4:22

bailed out Silicon Valley Bank well I

4:24

think that but we're but we're getting

4:26

to a very crucial Point here so let's

4:28

think about this one of an example of a

4:30

financial Insider would be a Stan dren

4:32

Miller a Warren Buffett Paul tutor Jones

4:35

something like that right so George

4:37

Soros another great example yeah right

4:40

so these guys have tons of connections

4:43

obviously all over the world and

4:45

specifically in China so let's think

4:47

about this if it is true that this

4:49

leaked from a lab that

4:52

scientist that knows what happened and

4:54

know how bad that could be he's going to

4:56

get on the phone immediately with a

4:57

local politician wow right that

4:59

politician is going to call the next guy

5:02

up the next guy up is most likely going

5:04

to know a lot of Bankers those Bankers

5:06

are most likely going to know George

5:08

Soros or they're going to know Paul

5:10

tutor Jones so what that what they're

5:12

going to do is call Paul tutor Jones say

5:14

dude you need to really pay attention to

5:16

this so what's he going to do he's going

5:18

to hire or pay for one of his research

5:21

analysts to go out there to Wuhan

5:24

specifically and talk to that scientist

5:27

right so his research analy or whoever

5:29

works for him is going to go out there

5:30

talk to the scientist then when he talks

5:32

to the scientist he's going to get on

5:33

the phone with Paul and say dude th this

5:36

is real like like this could end the

5:40

world oh my God okay so then if you're

5:41

Paul tutor Jones what do you do you buy

5:44

treasuries you buy treasuries wow

5:47

because you're going to buy the most

5:48

safe and liquid asset available which

5:51

whether we like it or not is the the the

5:54

United States Treasury more specifically

5:55

the long end of the curve so why would

5:56

they buy the long end of the curve well

5:58

you know this your viewers might not but

6:00

if interest rates go down by

6:03

1% prices are going to go up by much

6:07

more if you own a 30-year Bond compared

6:10

to a one-month Bond right so if you're

6:13

out there looking for capital

6:14

appreciation or if you're just hedging

6:15

your portfolio yeah you're going to get

6:17

far more juice the further you go out

6:19

the yield curve so all the Paul tutor

6:21

Jones types start buying the long end

6:24

which makes interest rates come down

6:27

lower than the FED funds rate because

6:29

expecting

6:31

lower lower growth and inflation

6:33

expectations it go back to Irving fiser

6:35

right in the 1920s

6:37

1930s and so that's what this is all

6:40

about and in my

6:41

opinion that's why the curve has such

6:45

great predictive Powers it's because

6:47

these these they're just trading on

6:49

Insider

6:50

information right and that's why it's

6:52

always correct so another example I use

6:54

is just our good buddy Ken marroy or

6:56

even you you know how many doors do you

6:57

have right now oh we just started a real

6:59

estate fund I think we're now uh in

7:01

we're probably in total will'll be like

7:02

4550 doors or something like that okay

7:04

fantastic so let's just fast forward

7:06

here 10 years and I'm sure you're going

7:08

to be just as successful as Kenny marroy

7:10

so right now Kenny has 1.5 billion with

7:14

a B under management so let's just

7:16

assume for a moment that he has 100,000

7:18

apartment units okay well if there's a

7:21

guy that's going to have Insider

7:22

information as far as what rents are

7:24

doing yeah it's going to be Kenny maroy

7:26

of course all right so let's just assume

7:28

for a moment that there's an

7:30

ETF where you can

7:33

short rent rates at a national level

7:36

okay you can go short rent rates right

7:38

so if Kenny with all of his 100,000

7:40

apartment units sees uh rents going down

7:44

can't get the unit rented anymore has to

7:45

lower rents occupancy going down he sees

7:47

all this in real time he has this

7:49

Insider information that is legal but

7:51

it's still information that Wall Street

7:54

doesn't have yet and definitely the re

7:56

they're just listening to these CNBC

7:58

headlines where they're saying oh the

8:00

economy is booming and rents are going

8:01

up that's not what I'm seeing so I'm

8:04

going to go out there and hedge the

8:06

portfolio of multif Family Properties

8:07

that I have and I'm going to do so by

8:09

buying that ETF that goes up in value

8:13

when rents go down that's effectively

8:16

the 10-year treasury yield that's right

8:18

that's the 10-year treasury that's that

8:21

that the equivalent of the ETF that you

8:23

would buy to go long rents going down so

8:28

and what have you today so what we've

8:31

seen today is the 2-year treasury yield

8:34

plummet and why I mean plummet it's gone

8:37

it's down maybe 10 15 basis points and I

8:40

think it at the lowest point today it

8:42

got down to about

8:44

4.1 which is massive because just two

8:46

days ago is about

8:48

4.35 25 points so it's a 25 basis points

8:51

drop in two days now most people would

8:53

see that say oh I that's percentagewise

8:55

it's not that big of a deal but they

8:57

have to realize in the treasury market

8:58

that is huge and what's what ALS uh so

9:02

this is abnormal in other words that

9:04

movement absolutely abnormal and what

9:06

makes it even more bizarre is that

9:08

there's no news you know you had PPI

9:10

come out today that I think was a little

9:12

bit lower but that would not and CPI

9:14

yesterday a little hotter so it's kind

9:16

of like you it's like a wash yeah

9:18

exactly wash on so it it really wouldn't

9:20

explain the 25 basis point drop now

9:24

what's happened because of that 25 basis

9:26

point drop is it's gotten much closer

9:29

to the 10-year treasury yield because

9:31

all of us know that the curve has been

9:33

inverted for the last you know whatever

9:35

let's say 18 months or so right so now

9:38

what's happening is we're seeing that

9:58

uninversity has preceded every single

10:01

recession that we've had but we don't

10:03

usually have the recession when the

10:05

curve is still inverted we have the

10:07

recession after the curve uninverted

10:11

and we're about to so well we got a lot

10:14

closer over the last two days and it's

10:17

looking like it's going to uninverted

10:22

why that's important to retail investors

10:26

is you realize that once that curve

10:27

inverts now what we also need to talk

10:29

about is the bull steepener versus the

10:30

bare steepener which we were discussing

10:32

earlier because that would be a big

10:35

signal that you this we're either

10:37

confirming the action or it's disproving

10:41

so I and I want to go into that if I can

10:43

I want to pick up on this too is it

10:46

possible uh that the ten is falling

10:50

because people are convinced our rates

10:51

are going to come down so they want to

10:53

lock in those rates longer so they're

10:54

buying the 10 year more than they're

10:56

buying the two or could there be a

10:58

logical EXP explanation outside of

11:01

recession um well let's think that

11:04

through because uh long-term interest

11:06

rates are future

11:07

growth and inflation expectations which

11:12

seem to be low now right so let's just

11:14

assume for a moment that the 10-year

11:17

treasury yield was coming down just

11:18

simply because people thought that the

11:20

FED did a great job and rates come right

11:24

exactly and that rates are coming back

11:26

down or excuse me the CPI is coming back

11:28

down to 2% the fed's Target Mission

11:31

Accomplished mission accomplished that's

11:32

right and therefore the FED is going to

11:34

drop rates down to let's say 3.5% and we

11:37

got unemployment at 3.5 and that's going

11:40

to allow the economy to go ahead and

11:42

boom further we got stock market at

11:44

alltime highs this is pretty much the

11:47

narrative that you see okay well in that

11:49

scenario it is true that inflation would

11:51

come down but what would happen to

11:52

growth expectations well I guess longer

11:54

term would probably stabilize lower uh

11:56

well future growth expectations would

11:58

increase uh because because you're

12:00

dodging a recession you mean sorry I was

12:02

thinking the dropping of the 10-year uh

12:04

yield that maybe we're not looking at

12:06

the 5% GDP growth for example we had

12:09

estimated in last quarter but so there's

12:10

two components there there's two

12:11

components so what we've got to

12:13

compartmentalize is the uh the the

12:16

growth expectations and inflation

12:19

expectations so what you're talking

12:20

about is inflation expectations going

12:22

back down right to uh 2% and this is

12:26

what is allowing the FED to drop rates

12:29

from

12:30

5.25% let's say down to 4 or 3.5

12:34

something that would be far more

12:35

accommodative though the real tightness

12:38

stays the same so to speak as those

12:39

inflation but those interest rates would

12:41

be more accommodative let's just say for

12:43

the real economy now of a sudden people

12:45

can get mortgages at a cheaper rate

12:48

people can borrow money for cars at a

12:50

cheaper R pay later yeah they can do all

12:52

these things and it it really uh uh

12:55

releases a lot of the pressure and some

12:57

of the commercial real estate and maybe

12:59

some of the banking issues that we saw

13:00

in 2023 and March and whatnot so in that

13:04

scenario it is true that the FED could

13:06

drop rates if inflation is coming back

13:09

down closer to their target but what's

13:11

also going to happen in that environment

13:13

theoretically is growth expectations

13:15

would also go up right right okay I see

13:17

what you're saying now yes yes

13:18

absolutely so it's it's it's not just

13:20

one or the other it's the combination of

13:22

both okay you see so so if yields are

13:26

going down which is what we're seeing on

13:27

the 10year treasury and mind you we

13:29

talked about the 2-year tanking well

13:32

yields on the 10year treasury have gone

13:34

down as well just at a slower rate I see

13:37

okay okay so your argument to to

13:39

streamline it for the viewers would be

13:42

uh hey what we're seeing right now is

13:45

that the 10 years dropping while the

13:46

two's dropping but wait a minute if we

13:48

thought the economy was about to Boom

13:50

then we would think the 10 years should

13:52

be going up boom Now counter question

13:55

would be what if uh people think the

13:58

economy is going to Boom with next to

14:01

zero inflation just to go extreme for a

14:03

moment on on the argument if people

14:05

thought well we'll have you know strong

14:07

economy at maybe 2 and a half% growth or

14:09

whatever with inflation at zero or half

14:12

a percent below the fed's target could

14:14

you see both yields drop in that case

14:16

yeah what you'd see there is you'd see

14:18

that you'd see a nice upward sloping

14:20

yield curve you'd see a normalization

14:22

yeah which we're kind of trending back

14:24

towards now no the 10 years's going down

14:26

remember the 10e uh this both going down

14:28

still yeah I mean just a few couple

14:30

months ago the 10e treasury was over 5%

14:33

yes and now it's at 3.9 B did you see

14:36

that play you know Bill Amman he he he

14:39

did the what was it he's been he's been

14:42

complaining that the uh tenure was going

14:44

to go above 5% so what he did is he

14:48

shorted treasuries uh heavily and we

14:51

talked about it nonstop on social and so

14:54

he's like it's going to go well past 5%

14:57

is what he said as soon as it got to 4.9

15:00

wow these are a deal covers goes long

15:03

the treasuries oh smart well he I think

15:06

he played it yeah yeah yeah I think

15:08

you're better off kind of listen to dren

15:10

Miller than Atman but if you look at

15:13

what dren Miller did that was I think

15:15

that was really genius as far as that

15:16

trade and what he did is instead of

15:18

going long the tenear he actually went

15:21

long with leverage on the two-year ah

15:24

because he expected the two would fall

15:25

so much faster the yield therefore the

15:27

bond price up not only that but he also

15:30

saw a little bit more risk at the long

15:32

end because of the deficits and because

15:34

of the supply side of the treasuries

15:35

yeah that's a good point so that that

15:37

was really a kind of a genius as you

15:39

would expect from from Dr and yeah of

15:41

course yeah but it it goes back to if if

15:44

the market the the bond market was

15:47

expecting a no Landing type scenario

15:49

with what you're saying the 10year

15:51

treasury yield would be going up as the

15:53

as the FED funds rate comes down so

15:56

therefore You' get to that uninversity

15:58

front end maybe coming down slightly but

16:00

the long end going up more so than the

16:03

front end which which so then what you'd

16:05

have is let's just say the FED funds

16:07

right around

16:08

4.5% right and then which would be 75

16:11

basis point cut and that's what they're

16:13

saying three uh three Cuts right now

16:15

sure but then the 10e treasury would not

16:17

be going sorry five or whatever yeah the

16:19

10year treasury would not be going down

16:21

to 3.9% it would be going from 5% you

16:25

know higher it would be going higher you

16:27

know it would be going up six maybe

16:29

6.5% if if if it was projecting even

16:32

lower inflation but yet much more growth

16:35

that is interesting so so maybe a more

16:37

normal curve might look like that okay

16:39

fed funds the two-year aligns with that

16:41

you go four and a half you go say six

16:43

and a half on the 10 so we've got a two

16:45

spread here and 30 would be higher yeah

16:47

exact even higher exactly so you've got

16:48

your normal yield curve now and if it

16:50

was infl and now let's talk about if it

16:53

was predicting a no Landing okay with a

16:56

reacceleration in inflation okay then

16:59

you would see it even steeper even

17:01

steeper of that curve that's right then

17:02

the 10 year it would be screaming higher

17:05

sure because it's now uh you've got

17:09

you've got the growth expectations

17:11

higher and then you've got the inflation

17:13

expectations higher is there a chance

17:15

that so we have this like you mentioned

17:17

would be normal let's say 4 and a half

17:19

to 6 and a half let's say yeah is there

17:21

a chance we just to go extreme pull both

17:25

sides down 4% and so you're half% on the

17:28

two and 2 and a half on the 10e and

17:32

that's what we're marching towards right

17:33

so it's always possible you know I like

17:35

to remind people that there are no

17:37

certainties that's in this world

17:39

there're only probabilities what would

17:40

that

17:41

mean deflation uh no now what I mean

17:46

what you're talking about there is first

17:48

of all the FED funds rate is at what

17:52

5.25% it have to go to zero yeah well it

17:54

would have to go down to uh let's just

17:57

say the 10e goes from 3.9 because when

17:59

the FED is decreasing rates it I I don't

18:02

know that there has been a time in

18:03

history where the 10 years's actually

18:04

gone up you know straight up as the

18:06

fed's dropping rates because usually

18:08

when the fed's not usually when the FED

18:10

is dropping rates it's doing so to

18:12

prevent a recession a recession or

18:14

crisis right they're always behind the

18:16

curve oh for sure I think if they miss

18:18

here on jobs and we start having a

18:20

self-fulfilling layoff cycle we're deep

18:22

in a recession yeah and remember that

18:23

that jobs is always a lagging indicator

18:25

super laggy that's the problem once you

18:27

have that it's too late yeah if you

18:28

actually look at the

18:30

Lei uh which is the leading economic

18:33

index and that was the the conference

18:35

board or some I forgot the entity that

18:37

puts that out but you see that when it

18:39

gets past ne4 we've always been in a

18:42

recession not just predicting one and

18:43

now we're at Nega 8 and then if you look

18:46

at GDI compared to GDP we see that g in

18:49

fact E I did a video on this the other

18:51

day that the FED I went to their website

18:54

and saw a report that they gave in 2016

18:56

where they themselves argued that the

18:58

GDI was a far better predictor of

19:01

economic growth or economic recession

19:04

than the GDP itself and right now you

19:06

have GDI negative and you have GDP going

19:10

up there's a there's a there's um uh

19:14

there's a Delta there sure right and the

19:16

only time that we've seen that

19:18

Divergence with GDP and GDI was just

19:21

prior to uh the GFC wow that's that's a

19:25

a pretty big crash that's not even a as

19:28

they say the shallow recession yeah but

19:31

another thing I think your viewers might

19:33

want to contemplate is you know this

19:37

whole Drome pal pivot thing yeah okay I

19:39

I think we need to and a lot of people

19:41

assume that hey well if interest rates

19:43

are coming back down well that's going

19:45

to be fantastic that's going to be great

19:47

for the economy that's going to be great

19:49

for the stock market but what they're

19:50

forgetting to ask themselves is wire

19:53

rates coming down well Jerome pow's

19:54

argument would be that inflation is

19:56

falling right EX exactly but let's think

19:59

that one through okay okay okay so if

20:00

you're Jerome pal you're 65 you're 70

20:03

years old you're worth $100 million the

20:06

only thing that you're really cared

20:07

about you really care about right now or

20:09

your number one priority would be your

20:10

legacy yeah reputation absolutely right

20:13

so you know that history is going to

20:15

remember you one of two ways Aaron Burr

20:18

or Paul

20:19

vulker yeah no well you're either going

20:21

to be um uh a hero or a loser that's

20:25

right yeah that's right simple so you

20:27

want to be

20:28

uh Paul vulker yeah exactly you do not

20:31

want to be Arthur Burns Arthur Burns I

20:33

said Aon my bad no problem you don't

20:35

want to be Arthur Burns right so let's

20:38

think about the scenarios here you've

20:41

got no Landing you've got soft landing

20:44

and you've got hard Landing well what's

20:46

interesting is if you look at the

20:48

incentives involved here Drome pal has

20:52

every incentive for a hard Landing what

20:55

because well if if we have a hard

20:57

Landing then history remembers him as

20:58

Paul vulker who solved inflation and

21:01

comes and bails it out well that solved

21:03

inflation by creating a recession right

21:04

yeah ex terrible that's how history

21:07

remembers Paul vulker he had the balls

21:09

to do what no one else was willing to do

21:12

and make the tough decisions to take

21:14

rates high enough to break the back of

21:16

inflation even though it created an

21:19

economic recession that's now right or

21:20

wrong that's how history remembers yeah

21:22

that's true Paul vulker but it's also

21:24

scary because it creates that hardship

21:27

of joblessness

21:28

and it does but let's just look at it

21:30

through the lens of Legacy and the

21:32

incentive just for one man that at the

21:34

end of the day is a human being and is

21:36

flawed just like any of us so you think

21:38

he's incentivized to cause a recession

21:41

when but then we had such high inflation

21:43

expectations which we don't today but

21:45

but let okay now you're getting on

21:47

you're getting to the next Point here

21:48

okay so that's the the the the hard

21:51

Landing okay Paul

21:53

vulker if we just look at it through

21:55

that lens is remembered as a hero yes

21:57

okay we can age yes so soft Landing he's

22:00

most likely also remembered as a hero

22:04

but where he's got risk is the no

22:06

Landing because the no Landing what he

22:08

risks is a reacceleration in inflation

22:13

and if he risks re acceleration

22:15

inflation he also risks being Arthur

22:18

Burns yes yes yes so let's just assume

22:21

for a moment that that's his main driver

22:24

that's his don't be Arthur don't be

22:26

Arthur Burns so then you got to ask

22:29

yourself what would it take to Pivot

22:32

when inflation is still above your 2%

22:35

Target right right on the on the annual

22:38

basis yeah what that in my view that

22:41

means that the information that he's

22:43

getting that he is not sharing with the

22:45

general public is is not good I agree

22:49

because you're you're essentially

22:51

arguing he's seeing that softness at

22:55

small business contacts that Insider

22:57

information he calling up the Warren

22:59

buffets the business owners the owners

23:01

of whatever all The Insider info he's on

23:04

the phone

23:05

going oh we may have gone too far yeah

23:08

and they've got the beige book I don't

23:09

know if you've done a video on that but

23:11

the the most recent uh beige book and if

23:14

that's their surveys and talking to

23:16

people with the regional yeah with the

23:18

regional Banks right uh that's their

23:20

surveys so it's all anecdotal but that's

23:22

The Insider information that you're

23:23

talking about and if you that too if you

23:25

look at the well but did you look at the

23:27

summ

23:29

area New York Philadelphia you look at

23:31

the most recent summaries they're all

23:34

it's getting bad it's getting bad it's

23:37

that's pretty much the summary from

23:39

every single one of these Regional Banks

23:42

is that unemployment it it's getting or

23:44

the employment picture it's all these

23:46

things are turning so when you combine

23:48

that with the Lei and I also think that

23:51

drone pal is looking at their markets

23:55

because we have to understand that this

23:56

is a globally connected economy and the

23:59

probability that we have a recession in

24:02

Europe a recession in Japan a recession

24:05

in China and we somehow avoid a

24:07

recession that the probability is

24:09

incredibly incredibly low because of how

24:12

Global the economy is right now and I

24:15

would argue how Global the monetary

24:16

system is yes right because we have to

24:18

understand coordinated yeah the banks

24:21

create liquidity right so if you have a

24:25

problem in the the the global banking

24:28

Network that we call the euro dollar

24:30

system and if that problem is created by

24:33

China well that's still going to spill

24:34

over into the United States economy you

24:37

say well George why should we care about

24:38

liquidity well ask Silicon Valley Bank

24:40

if they care about liquidity you see

24:42

yeah well and and drum power turned on

24:44

the money printer for that pretty fast

24:45

huh well they look at the btfp that's

24:48

another great point right 13 40 m

24:50

billion now and it's going straight up

24:52

and they're they're saying that it's

24:53

because of an Arbitrage but always half

24:55

the explanation they're giving yeah so

24:57

what they're saying because the interest

24:58

rate on

24:59

btfp is is some esoteric spread I think

25:03

it's the one year forward swap spread

25:06

something like that the cost on that

25:07

yeah yeah okay and it so it's that

25:09

interest rate plus 10 basis points

25:11

that's what the FED is charging for btfp

25:14

but on I which is what they pay on Bank

25:16

Reserves it's still 5.25% so what's

25:19

happen is inflation or excuse me when

25:21

interest rates the expectation for fed

25:24

funds goes down now of a sudden in

25:26

November there was this Arbitrage

25:29

opportunity because the the btfp rate

25:32

went down to let's say 4.9% but they

25:34

could still get 5.25 at I so why not

25:38

just borrow from the fed and just park

25:39

the funds there and pocket the spread

25:41

it's a one-year loan and so uh and and

25:44

the program expires soon too so you may

25:46

as well use it now the question is and

25:48

it's a question for you are they just

25:49

going to extend it because they're

25:50

certainly not going to call it all due

25:52

at that moment and just have a banking

25:54

crisis again drone doesn't want that I

25:56

absolutely agree okay well that if he

25:58

was worried about inflation that would

25:59

be one way to tackle it yeah just

26:02

collaps the banks kind of crazy to think

26:04

they have the power to do that but uh

26:06

yeah but but let's focus because I want

26:08

to focus on that just for a moment

26:09

because if you listen to the mainstream

26:11

media you'll hear that it's all about

26:12

this Arbitrage which could be true but

26:14

the reason I'm skeptical there is

26:16

because when Silicon Valley Bank and

26:18

First Republic and signature uh and

26:21

let's not forget about credit s when

26:23

they when they went busted back in March

26:24

of 2023 they set up this btfp and the

26:28

utilization went straight to about 60

26:30

billion about two weeks yeah and so then

26:34

what you would expect if you listen to

26:35

the mainstream media is that it went

26:37

straight back down to zero because

26:39

obviously the problem was solved right

26:41

the the clever fed came in and with

26:43

their all their tools and whatnot and

26:45

magically just kind of papered over the

26:47

problem yeah so then what happened is

26:51

November the Arbitrage opportunity so

26:53

the big question in my mind is okay what

26:55

what happened between April and November

26:57

M uh did the btfp go down no to your

27:00

point it went straight up still so you

27:03

cannot explain the parabolic move in the

27:06

btfp lately just through the Arbitrage

27:09

when it was going up between April to

27:12

November when there was no Arbitrage

27:14

opportunity in other words probably some

27:16

additional residual stress is occurring

27:17

or starting to occur where banks that

27:20

weren't part of the program which

27:21

honestly probably looks like a little

27:23

bit like a black mark like if you're a

27:25

bank and you're showing up at the btfp

27:27

window or whatever it's like the

27:28

discount window yeah it's like that's

27:29

embarrassing yeah that's right there's a

27:31

stigma to it yeah and and that stigma is

27:34

not good moving forward when you need to

27:36

do business with all these other Banks

27:39

and your liquidity needs will be

27:41

provided by these Banks obviously when

27:43

you look at the risk reward it's not

27:46

just about the Arbitrage of course yeah

27:48

no kidding so that's really interesting

27:49

so um okay well in that case uh there

27:54

are now estimates that forget uh you

27:57

know waiting on rate Cuts you know we're

27:59

going to start getting them in March uh

28:01

and who says they have to be 25 bips we

28:04

could be three rate Cuts but they could

28:05

be 50 each what's your take of of that

28:08

point of view that we're actually going

28:09

to get larger more rapid Cuts quickly

28:12

and then that would obviously suggest

28:14

more problems

28:17

yeah yeah because what people don't

28:19

understand is that most often lower

28:22

interest rates means tighter money yeah

28:25

not looser money well sure because Banks

28:26

stop Lending that's right well everybody

28:28

thinks oh I'm going to get rich again

28:29

when when there's a recession in fact

28:31

like you have this like Tik Tock

28:33

mentality where everybody is like

28:35

begging for a depression which I I I

28:38

don't know I want your opinion on but I

28:39

think it's crazy because you know we

28:41

look at like the last depressions were

28:43

you know the early 1920s and the end of

28:45

the 1920s horrible Economic Times sure

28:47

we had the social Awakening of the

28:49

Roaring 20s in the middle but

28:50

depressions are horrible for people but

28:52

prices come down and I think that's what

28:54

people are focusing on now it's like oh

28:55

we want prices to come down again yeah

28:57

you got to be careful what you wish for

28:59

yeah right because we had interest rates

29:01

come down during the GFC and that didn't

29:04

exactly stimulate Demand right because

29:05

you had a job and and by the way it's

29:07

not like uh you know credit was free

29:10

flowing I'll give you an example I I got

29:12

into real estate investing in

29:14

2012 and uh I retired and I just wanted

29:18

to manage my own money so I thought okay

29:20

well what's cheap right now you know my

29:22

favorite investor is Jim Rogers still is

29:24

so one of Jim Rogers rules is just buy

29:26

low sell High

29:28

which sounds easy but it's actually kind

29:29

of hard to it's extrem

29:31

hard so I looked around I thought that

29:33

real estate was cheap so what I did is I

29:36

basically took my my life savings and I

29:39

started buying all these rental

29:40

properties in the midwest wow and I was

29:42

buying these literally for about 50

29:44

Grand and then my models i' and this is

29:47

in good neighborhoods which Kansas City

29:50

okay yeah on the Missouri side of Kansas

29:51

City and Le Summit and uh and Blue

29:54

Springs and whatnot would you still buy

29:55

there today um no because I've been

29:58

selling since

29:59

2018 because that that goes to my rule

30:02

that you I never try to figure out price

30:04

Direction okay okay never ever ever okay

30:06

I just start by asking myself is it

30:08

cheap or is it expensive if it's cheap I

30:11

buy it if it's expensive I sell it even

30:14

if I think prices are going to continue

30:16

to go up it doesn't matter CU I'm not

30:17

trying to time the bottom I'm not trying

30:19

to time the top and we can get into what

30:22

I bought in March of 2020 the exact same

30:24

concept I bought oil but I thought in

30:27

this was maybe was at 20 I thought it

30:28

was going a lot lower I thought it was

30:30

going down to 10 maybe even five but I

30:32

started buying around 20 because the

30:34

rule is you buy when it's cheap negative

30:37

for a period of time that's Nega 38

30:39

that's right and so but then I started

30:41

selling around 80 85 even though I

30:43

thought the prices were going to

30:44

continue to go up sure could go 12 at

30:47

that point you know ad justed for

30:48

inflation historically speaking it got

30:50

to the point where it was expensive but

30:52

my point there is I bought all these

30:55

properties Kevin cash yeah cash cash

30:57

cash so I had this portfolio of let's

30:59

say 15 rental properties that I put

31:02

renters in you know I'm in it for maybe

31:04

75,000 a pop I'm collecting

31:07

$1,100 a month in rent I have no debt

31:10

none it's all well with the exception of

31:13

the EXP property taxes and yeah that's

31:14

30% whatever all positive cash flow

31:16

exactly right so now let's it's maybe

31:19

mid 2013 or something like that I I am

31:22

the perfect borrower the perfect

31:25

borrower oh of course credit score you

31:28

know whatever it is and so I go to the

31:30

banks I'm like look I've got all this

31:31

Equity can I at least get just maybe

31:33

like a line of credit I don't even know

31:35

if I'll use it no no just denied denied

31:38

denied denied denied I'm like how about

31:41

just like a 40% LTV yeah yeah no denied

31:45

denied denied this is at 0% interest

31:48

rates so this is an example of how

31:51

interest rates can be very very money

31:53

can be cheap but it can also be

31:55

extremely tight of course

31:57

money is tight it's very difficult to

32:01

have an an expansion or a substantial

32:04

significant suspension in uh expansion

32:07

in the overall economy and so that's

32:10

what people you got to be careful what

32:12

you wish for uh if interest rates go

32:14

back to zero people think that it's

32:15

going to be boom time but they forget to

32:18

ask the question well why are rates at

32:20

zero interesting well because

32:21

inflation's going to go away and we're

32:22

going to fight deflation right but so

32:24

then my argument believe well so here's

32:27

my argument there if okay so people

32:30

assume that 0% interest rates are normal

32:33

well and they also assume that that

32:35

let's say fed funds right now at 5.25%

32:38

they also assume that that's high

32:40

interest rates right right just based on

32:42

recent memory sure no what are you no

32:43

this is normal this is normal so if

32:47

inflation comes back down to 2% right

32:51

and the economy is doing well why would

32:53

the FED drop rates has to be a problem

32:56

that why would they they wouldn't drop

32:57

rates they'd keep rates right about

32:59

where they are because historically this

33:02

is about average so if you've got a nice

33:05

a good structurally sound economy that

33:08

was growing at a nice clip if you got

33:11

unemployment at let's say 3.5% if you've

33:14

got all these things that are acting as

33:16

Tailwinds for the economy and the

33:18

economy is very very healthy you know

33:20

running on all eight cylinders cut

33:22

exactly you would expect you would

33:24

expect fed funds to be right around 5 or

33:28

5.25%

33:30

so what if they see 2% deflation and

33:33

that's why they're cunning okay so then

33:35

you have to ask yourself if we have 2%

33:38

def not disinflation right correct

33:40

deflation what does that mean for asset

33:43

prices and what does that mean for the

33:45

economy keep in mind we have not seen 2%

33:47

deflation since the Great Depression

33:50

right this is true right actually I I

33:52

take that back we I we saw it

33:54

1949 because in the 1940s going into the

33:57

War um it was just prior to that so what

33:59

happened is we got out of the war we had

34:01

price controls and then when they lifted

34:03

the price controls uh in 47 the CPI went

34:06

to

34:07

19% and then it went just just parabolic

34:10

straight up to 19% and then two years

34:12

later was actually negative yeah but

34:14

like you go up 20% and down 2% like who

34:17

cares yeah so prices are still a lot

34:18

higher Agate total but we did have a

34:21

period of not just disinflation and that

34:23

would imply that you have lower and

34:25

lower rates of inflation but we actually

34:27

saw prices go down and it was right

34:29

right around 3% but if you go to 2009

34:33

right people forget that we did have a

34:34

quarter of actual deflation in 2009 but

34:38

it is very very quick so I do not expect

34:42

uh 2024 overall even if we do have a

34:45

hard Landing to result in in massive

34:48

deflation because I think the central

34:50

planners will come in and do more of

34:53

what they did in uh yeah in 2020 or

34:56

something like that which takes us to

34:58

the next wave of consumer price

35:00

inflation and that's why my good friend

35:03

and business partner Lynn Alden uh she's

35:05

been talking about this for a couple

35:07

years that her base case is that the

35:10

2020s isn't necessarily the 1970s but it

35:13

looks a lot more like the 1940s oh

35:15

interesting where inflation is just this

35:17

big roller coaster ride depending on

35:21

what fiscal policy looks like oh well

35:24

they're so good at balancing the budget

35:25

right now we should be wait yeah no I

35:28

mean it's I think we went from stimulus

35:30

checks in the 20 1920 or sorry uh in the

35:32

2020 year in 2021 to basically corporate

35:36

stimulus checks now it's all the you

35:39

know the inflation reduction act the

35:40

chips act here we'll subsidize the

35:42

factories I mean what do you think about

35:43

that yeah I mean the

35:45

btfp is is basically a stimy check for

35:48

for banks yeah gav's Bank yeah but I I

35:52

think that people will probably see

35:54

stimy checks again oh really you think

35:57

they they'll go back to that y uh like

36:00

Ubi or just straight I think where this

36:03

leads now whether it's 2024 in the next

36:06

5 years I have no clue but my base case

36:09

again just probabilities here is that we

36:13

land with in Ubi territory uh we land in

36:17

price controls oh wow and we land in in

36:20

cbdc because I think that's how they

36:22

they issue the uh the Ubi because the

36:25

fed's balance sheet is is infinite and I

36:28

think that they're going to try to

36:30

control inflation through the extension

36:32

of credit uh because if you have if

36:34

you're doing uh PPP and stimy checks

36:38

let's say right you know that that's

36:40

going to create inflation if you don't

36:42

offset it with a decline in Bank lending

36:46

okay another way to look at it yes sure

36:47

that's interest because we're just

36:48

looking at through the lens of M2 so if

36:50

M2 is going up as a result of the FED

36:53

we'll just call it you know I don't like

36:54

the term but printing money you know

36:56

because they're giving stimy checks and

36:57

it's it's basically on the fed's balance

36:59

sheet the liability of the FED uh then

37:01

you see M2 more currency units chasing

37:03

goods and services this is inflationary

37:05

the way that you combat that say Okay

37:07

Banks you are going to start lending

37:09

less sure right so you tighten the

37:11

velocity basically yeah so veloc well

37:13

velocity would probably uh increase but

37:16

you'd have M2 money supply go up because

37:18

what you're doing in the stemy checks is

37:21

is you're increasing velocity because

37:22

you're putting a lot more of the M2

37:24

money supply into checking accounts

37:25

which are a lot like a lot more likely

37:28

for people to go out there and spend

37:30

than Investments Investments have a

37:31

velocity of like two whereas money in

37:32

your savings is like four or five yeah

37:36

the way and I know that gets a little

37:37

complex for for the viewer but the

37:39

easiest way to look at this is let's

37:40

just say that uh the treasury deficit

37:43

spends by uh not doing um you know the

37:47

fed's balance sheet or something like

37:48

but printing money but let's just say

37:49

they do that by borrowing money sure

37:52

okay so you're an investor you want to

37:54

buy a 10-year treasury something like

37:56

that so so you've got an excess of of

37:59

your your your productivity you've got

38:01

savings right well that savings you're

38:03

not using that to buy Big Macs or buy

38:06

your kids diapers or anything like that

38:08

right you're that's your savings so by

38:11

definition it's very low velocity y so

38:13

you say look I'm getting 2% on my

38:15

savings why would I not want to get 5.5%

38:18

in a 3-month treasury and just roll it

38:20

over so I'm going to go ahead and take

38:22

this money from my savings and I'm going

38:23

to lend it to Janet Yellen right I'm

38:25

going to lend it that buying a treasury

38:27

exactly okay so then Janet Yellen takes

38:29

that money and says okay what we're

38:31

going to do is we're going to spend this

38:33

on stimulus checks so what has happened

38:36

is that let's just say ,000 has gone

38:38

from your savings account with zero

38:40

velocity and it's ended up in someone's

38:42

checking account with very high velocity

38:45

so that's how you can get an increase of

38:46

consumer price inflation even though

38:48

you're not doing you know even though

38:50

you're not quote unquote money printing

38:52

yeah that's fair I I guess if you

38:54

tighten lending though there's going to

38:55

be a limit to how often probably that

38:57

same dollar can roll over because you

38:58

can't leverage it supposedly but I see

39:01

what you're saying like it should it

39:02

should go up so then the question is is

39:05

there huh is it so really this all

39:09

starts with a two-year the twoyear

39:11

plummeting and there are really I see

39:14

two choices uh one is something's really

39:18

wrong which probably things have started

39:19

to turn I agree with that uh the second

39:23

is there's It's a combination where

39:26

things have started to turn and maybe

39:29

through whatever lens the FED is looking

39:31

at it they see inflation as solved is is

39:34

that a possibility in your opinion it is

39:38

definitely a possibility but again we we

39:40

look at it through the lens of Arthur

39:41

Burns and Paul vulker so even if the FED

39:44

thinks that inflation is solved why

39:47

would they drop rates interesting if the

39:49

economy was healthy and they're and and

39:52

in their view they're looking out into

39:53

the future and saying well this is

39:55

fantastic look at this Trend we've gone

39:57

from 9% CPI all the way down to 3% and

40:01

you know PPI today comes in a little bit

40:03

low so we can assume that it's going to

40:06

continue down to 2% but the economy is

40:09

running on all eight cylinders in that

40:11

environment there is no need to drop

40:15

rates interesting why would you drop

40:17

rates the the the only reason you drop

40:20

rates is because the economy is not

40:22

healthy now now now if interest rates

40:25

were 15 % then I think you got a great

40:28

argument because interest rates are high

40:31

but 5.25% that's not high interest rates

40:34

that those are normal interest rates so

40:37

do you believe that a stronger economy

40:40

will definitely induce inflation when

40:42

they cut rates

40:43

again so let's our hypothetical is that

40:47

they cut rates and we have a strong

40:50

economy yeah why why would it produce

40:53

Consumer Price

40:55

inflation

40:57

well the main reason that's going to

40:59

produce Consumer Price inflation is or

41:02

at least inflation would re accelerate

41:05

right is because what's happening there

41:07

is you've got the banks now saying this

41:10

is fantastic okay we were worried about

41:13

this whole disinflation we are worried

41:15

about recession now we have this bailout

41:18

this is great news so we're going to

41:20

start lending again and we're going to

41:21

start lending into the economy we're

41:23

going to start lending into the

41:24

financial economy and then what you

41:26

would expect is something like the 1970s

41:29

where the M2 money supply goes up and up

41:32

and up because future growth and

41:34

inflation expectations are going up and

41:36

up and up now if that was the case again

41:39

the 10-year treasury yield would be

41:41

getting ahead of that it should be

41:43

showing that now it should be showing

41:45

that now right by going that's

41:46

absolutely right so I I think again that

41:49

that's that's a a possibility yeah right

41:52

that we somehow have this uh Magic like

41:54

Cinderella Story where growth Immaculate

41:57

disinflation yes yeah yeah where growth

41:59

just starts to to boom and then

42:02

inflation at the same time does come

42:05

down let's just say that was all supply

42:06

side stuff but then again that the FED

42:09

would not drop rates in that environment

42:13

because he's risking Arthur Burns and a

42:15

re acceleration of inflation it's a risk

42:19

it doesn't mean that it would happen or

42:21

it would pan out but it's you're risking

42:23

that so is it is there this weird

42:26

possibility that I and I try to look I

42:28

always try to think about the business

42:29

and like the individual uh individual

42:32

participants in the economy there were a

42:35

lot of businesses that were really

42:36

frustrated during covid that they had

42:38

all of this demand that they couldn't

42:39

fill yeah because the supply chains are

42:41

too tight but they were set for a normal

42:44

you know 2018 economy not a 2021 economy

42:47

so then over the 22 3 4 period we see

42:52

this massive expansion essentially of

42:53

manufacturing capabilities with

42:56

substantially lower demand doesn't that

42:58

mean we have this potential empty

43:01

ballast almost to where you could

43:03

substantially increase demand for Supply

43:06

chains that are now substantially

43:08

stronger and more stable hopefully

43:10

potentially so that you can actually

43:12

have real GDP growth without

43:16

inflation well first of all I think if

43:18

they solve the supply side issue that uh

43:21

CPI wouldn't be at 3% I see I think it'

43:23

already be quite uh a bit lower so it'd

43:26

be falling a lot faster you think yeah

43:28

because we have more goods and services

43:29

okay right let's remember that that

43:31

deflation can be a bad thing but it can

43:33

also be a great thing sure and in a free

43:35

market well everything should deflate

43:37

that's right that's absolutely right but

43:39

I don't think they want that because

43:40

that makes their debt more expensive to

43:42

pay off yeah it makes their debt more

43:44

expensive I I don't

43:45

know that's a whole separate topic I I

43:47

don't know if we're at a point right now

43:49

even though the debts at 34 trillion I I

43:52

don't believe it or not I I I don't know

43:55

that uh the debt in and of itself is a

43:57

problem for the government right now why

43:59

because there's plenty of demand for

44:02

treasuries if there wasn't a lot of

44:04

demand for the treasuries the 10e

44:05

wouldn't be at 3.9 twoyear wouldn't be

44:09

collapsing in yield in other words

44:10

skyrocketing in price yes good point so

44:12

there's obviously a ton of demand and

44:15

it's not like the bond market doesn't

44:16

know that we're running these wartime

44:19

deficits it's not like the bond market

44:21

doesn't know about all the off-balance

44:23

sheet liabilities it's not a meme stock

44:24

you're saying no no PA Jones George

44:27

Soros they get it yeah yeah exactly they

44:30

the financial insiders they get it and

44:31

they're still uh buying the long and

44:34

you're saying they're not worried about

44:35

the debt so we don't need to worry about

44:36

this like imminent debt collapse it's

44:38

bad but we don't have to worry about

44:39

today yeah so what people need to

44:40

realize is what's bad about the debt

44:43

isn't necessarily the debt it's the

44:45

government

44:46

spending see the the the way the example

44:49

I always use is it's like a heroin

44:52

addict okay okay so a heroin addict can

44:55

have a credit card

44:56

and run up the balance on the credit

44:58

card to 100,000 buying heroin which

45:01

destroys their body destroys their mind

45:04

and destroys their soul right so we

45:07

could come in to that heroin addict and

45:09

say guess what we're going to take your

45:11

balance all the way down to zero so you

45:13

no longer have any debt I just spend it

45:15

again so is that a a problem solved or

45:18

is that an even bigger problem because

45:20

now he's going to go and do more of the

45:22

same what ruined him to begin with you

45:25

see that's exactly like government

45:27

spending it's not necessarily the debt

45:29

that's bad it's the government spending

45:31

which distorts the overall economy let

45:34

me give you another statistic here that

45:35

I think you'll find

45:37

interesting in the late 1880s we were on

45:40

a gold standard okay so let's take a

45:43

15-year time frame from 1880 to 1895

45:48

okay we had about 30 right thought my

45:50

head 30 to 40%

45:52

deflation deflation think about the

45:55

benefit that acrs to the poor and middle

45:58

class if we had prices going down by 40%

46:04

over a 10 or 15E period even if their

46:06

incomes aren't going up their purchasing

46:08

power is increasing massively and by the

46:12

way during that time nominal wages went

46:14

up sure not down well at the low end

46:17

yeah so if nominal wages are going up

46:19

and prices are going down best their

46:22

purchasing power for the poor middle

46:23

class is just going absolutely through

46:25

the roof right so this is 1880 to 1895

46:30

now let's fast forward gold standard

46:32

let's fast forward to when the Fiat

46:35

standard went bananas right Peak Fiat

46:39

Insanity from 2008 Q 2020 QE Infinity QT

46:47

QE the fed's balance sheet to 89

46:50

trillion you know M2 money supply went

46:52

up by 25% in 2020 yada you know s y y

46:55

together well no we did have inflation

46:57

expansion of the money supply inflation

46:59

but not no Consumer Price inflation if

47:00

you look compound nomal though if you

47:02

look at compounded inflation the CPI

47:05

from uh 2008 to 2023 it went up by right

47:09

around let's say 30 or 40% so about in

47:11

total in total sure sure so on an annual

47:14

basis what it was like 1.8% what so

47:17

let's say 2 3% compounded you're going

47:19

to get 30 or 40% after 15 years right or

47:22

whatever the math is but in and let's

47:25

rewind

47:26

to the late 1800s where you saw a about

47:29

the same amount of deflation let's just

47:32

say 30% 30% now what's fascinating about

47:35

that is that the M2 money supply the

47:38

amount of currency units chasing goods

47:39

and services went up in the 1800s that

47:43

15year time frame by 150% wow okay but

47:48

what will blow people's mind is that

47:50

from 2008 to 2023 on this Fiat standard

47:54

runam Muk it went up up by

47:58

150% the exact same that's very

48:00

interesting the exact same so then what

48:02

you have to do is you have to ask

48:04

yourself okay what was the Catalyst why

48:07

did one 15-year time frame have

48:09

deflation versus have deflation versus

48:12

inflation or said another way why did

48:13

one period benefit the poor in middle

48:16

class and the other period hurt the poor

48:18

in middle class yes I agree I've done a

48:20

lot of research on this and the one main

48:22

variable that I can find fat is no is

48:25

government spending as a percentage of

48:27

GDP oh interesting so if we look at the

48:30

1800s federal government spending was

48:32

about 5% of GDP said another way the

48:36

overall output of the entire Society

48:39

came from the private 95% of it came

48:42

from the private sector right where now

48:44

it's

48:46

50/50 so who spends money more

48:48

efficiently oh is it the government or

48:50

is it going to be the private sector

48:51

always the private sector always the

48:53

private sector so is it any surprise

48:56

that if the private sector represents

48:57

95% of the economy we have more goods

49:01

and services being created to the extent

49:04

where prices are going down even though

49:06

the money supply is going up at the

49:08

exact same rate see that's very

49:10

interesting you see so the main takeaway

49:13

here is what you have to do if we want

49:15

to create this Society that's going to

49:18

be more uh let's say friendly to the

49:20

poor and middle class it doesn't come

49:22

with more government it comes with less

49:25

government

49:26

because that 50% of government spending

49:28

to GDP all that's doing for the most

49:30

part is is distorting the economy it's

49:34

distorting the ability to create more

49:36

goods and services which will drop

49:38

prices and that's that benefit that acrs

49:42

uh disproportionately to the poor and

49:44

middle class right so so that's why the

49:47

debt in and of itself isn't really the

49:49

big problem it's the government spending

49:51

okay so is this a a a maybe depressing

49:55

but potentially real scenario to think

49:58

of the government won't fix its spending

50:00

problem the debt won't lead our economy

50:03

to collaps anytime in the near future so

50:05

instead the money printer continues to

50:07

circulate yeah we see the wealth Gap

50:10

substantially widen and if you don't

50:12

have assets you're getting left behind

50:14

yeah yeah yeah that's depressing and I

50:16

think you look at Japan Japan is kind of

50:19

a Playbook you know so what's really

50:21

interesting here

50:23

is you say okay well I I I get the

50:26

reference to Japan Japan's at what uh

50:28

230% debt to GDP right now the United

50:32

States is about 110 or 120 and I

50:35

understand that 34 trillion in debt is

50:38

is huge but could we be the next Japan

50:42

or what a lot of people would argue is

50:44

is the dollar going to turn into toilet

50:46

paper and we're going to go the way of

50:48

Argentina yeah so I think it's a very

50:50

fascinating juxtoposition because if you

50:53

look at the two central banks and the

50:57

two policies you know not now but back

51:00

uh when the hyperinflation in Argentina

51:03

was just getting started they had very

51:04

similar policies oh so how is it that

51:07

one economy produces deflation and the

51:10

other produces hyperinflation sure is it

51:12

a loss how do you know if the US is

51:14

headed towards Argentina or Japan I know

51:17

it's weird to think of like trust in in

51:19

Fiat but is it Rel it's Al relative is

51:21

it because uh of a loss of trust in the

51:24

institutions in Argent versus maybe

51:26

those of the bank of Japan I think that

51:27

has a lot to do with it okay and then

51:29

you have to ask yourself why does that

51:31

happen well corruption or spending yeah

51:33

and I think another thing

51:35

that's I've been wrestling with quite a

51:38

bit and I I haven't come to a definitive

51:41

conclusion on this but I think a large

51:43

part of it could be the way the currency

51:47

was created to begin with so hear me out

51:50

on this one your your viewers may find

51:53

this uh an interesting thought

51:54

experiment let's let's say that I lend

51:56

you a dollar and I do so by just taking

52:00

a a dollar bill out of my pocket and

52:02

giving it to you and then the next day

52:04

you're like you know what George I don't

52:05

need this dollar I'm going to go ahead

52:06

and pay you back so you give me that

52:09

dollar and we still have a

52:10

dollar that that we still have $1 so

52:13

when I gave you that money or lent it to

52:15

you M2 money supply did not change and

52:18

when you paid it back it didn't change

52:20

it still won now let's think about this

52:23

a different way let's Sam I'm your bank

52:26

no no okay fractional Reserve Bank and

52:29

you say Okay George I I want to borrow a

52:31

dollar yeah and I say Okay Kevin I lent

52:33

you that dollar how did I do that I

52:35

didn't give you a green piece of paper I

52:37

simply added a digit to your checking

52:39

account right zero so so now instead of

52:42

having zero in your checking account you

52:44

have $1 right right what did we just do

52:45

to M2 money supply well I mean you just

52:48

doubled it it increased yeah it

52:49

increased by $1 and it's like 10x

52:52

probably so then so then what happens is

52:54

the next day going through the exact

52:56

same example you say you know what I

52:59

don't want the dollar anymore I'm going

53:00

to pay you back so then when you pay me

53:03

back you don't give me a green piece of

53:04

paper I just simply change the balance

53:07

on your bank account from $1 back down

53:09

to zero where it started so you see

53:11

what's happened is those two scenarios I

53:13

lent you a dollar one scenario didn't do

53:16

anything to M2 money supply the other

53:19

scenario increased M2 and then it

53:22

decreased M2 so money was created and

53:25

money was destroyed yes just by the

53:27

process of lending and paying it back so

53:29

now let's think about it in terms of a

53:31

pie chart let's say this pie chart

53:34

represents 100% of the currency so 100%

53:38

of the yen in existence or 100% of the

53:41

Argentinian Pesos in existence and let's

53:44

just take into extreme for the thought

53:45

experiment and assume that 100% of the

53:48

Yen that exist were lent into existence

53:53

now let's assume that 100% of the argen

53:55

pesos that exist were printed literally

53:59

printed into existence so if demand goes

54:03

down for those Argentinian

54:05

Pesos there's still the same amount of

54:07

pesos yeah it's just you have the same

54:09

amount of Supply demand goes down so the

54:11

value theoretically most likely goes

54:13

down as well but with the Japanese

54:16

Yen if demand goes down for the Yen what

54:20

happens the debt is paid off therefore

54:23

the supply goes down

54:25

with the amount of demand interesting so

54:28

as demand goes down Supply goes down as

54:31

well because you're assuming that if

54:33

there was less demand for the Yen the

54:35

people still have the Yen debt they're

54:37

going to go ahead and pay off that debt

54:38

which decreases the amount of currency

54:40

units so you see how it's a complete

54:43

night and day difference based on the

54:46

pie chart and how much of the overall

54:48

currency has been lent into existence

54:51

compared to how much of the overall

54:52

currency was printed into existence if

54:55

you look at Argentina the majority of it

54:58

especially lately was them literally

55:00

just printing like like P pieces of

55:02

paper to send out where with Japan the

55:05

majority of it I would argue was was

55:08

lent into existence by the banking

55:10

system itself so I haven't that that's

55:13

not yet conclusive it's just something

55:16

I've been thinking about I've started to

55:18

research it and it seems that I could be

55:20

on to something there but that may

55:22

explain the difference between Japan and

55:24

arent and if it does then you have to

55:27

look at the pie chart for the United

55:29

States and the US dollar which would be

55:31

even more extreme sure sure than Japan

55:34

but it's an argument against stimulus

55:35

checks and for Bank lending

55:38

theoretically uh well stimulus checks

55:41

you know so how where are they coming

55:43

from right they could be coming from

55:44

just uh issuing debt that's taking

55:46

savings and turning into checking right

55:49

if we were giving stimi checks by by

55:51

what we did in

55:52

1862 and so I go back to that cuz that

55:54

the of the Civil War we had the legal

55:56

tender act and that was the last time as

55:58

far as I can tell that the United States

56:00

government actually printed green pieces

56:02

of paper to pay for bombs or bullets or

56:05

whatever they were they were paying for

56:07

right now the process is the government

56:09

would just go ahead and uh

56:13

and they would issue the debt and if

56:16

they if there was no one there to buy

56:17

the debt then the Federal Reserve would

56:19

come in like they did during World War

56:20

II and then they would go ahead and and

56:22

buy that so then the base money would go

56:25

up but then you're assuming broad money

56:27

goes up as well which may or may not be

56:29

true depending on who uh the the FED is

56:32

buying those treasuries from that gets a

56:34

little bit complex but the bottom line

56:36

is is they in World War II they weren't

56:38

literally printing green piece of paper

56:40

to buy bombs like they were in 1862 It's

56:43

All Digital now on a spreadsheet and the

56:45

FED just absorbs it all basically and

56:47

and that that that can make all the

56:49

difference in the world that can make

56:51

all the difference in the world that

56:52

little thing you think could be the

56:53

difference between Japan and argentin

56:55

yeah Ah that's very interesting wow uh

56:57

that's so okay then um brief uh

57:02

outlooks just what do you do what does

57:05

somebody do listen listen who's

57:06

listening right now you buy real estate

57:08

you wait uh for the real estate crash do

57:10

you you know buy stocks at alltime highs

57:13

or do you wait what do you do yeah so my

57:15

favorite investor of all time is Jim

57:18

Rogers and one of the reasons he's my

57:20

favorite is because he has a knack for

57:23

just putting things in the most simple

57:25

terms possible which at the beginning

57:28

when you first hear it it sounds

57:29

oversimplified but when you think about

57:31

it it's actually very profound okay the

57:34

very first interview that I heard with

57:35

Jim Rogers it was in the I believe the

57:38

original Market Wizards books with Jack

57:39

schwager which I'm sure you've read many

57:41

many times and he was talking to Jim

57:44

about his investment philosophy and how

57:46

he's made he's been so successful he

57:48

says all I do is just sit in my chair

57:52

and do

57:53

nothing and the guy says okay well well

57:56

how does that work he goes I he says

57:57

what the retail investor does is they're

57:59

always trying to do stuff yeah they

58:01

don't have enough patience so what I do

58:03

is I just sit my chair I do nothing and

58:05

I wait for a big pile of money sitting

58:07

in the corner and when I see it I go

58:09

pick it up and then I go back to my

58:11

chair and I just wait for the next pile

58:14

of money to appear in the corner and

58:17

I'll go pick that up as well and the

58:18

interim I don't do anything okay and I

58:21

think that's a great Philosophy for

58:23

people right now and the good news Kevin

58:26

is that we're we're in this time when

58:28

the curve is inverted so to time this

58:31

and to know what to do it's actually

58:32

pretty easy okay if if you believe if

58:35

your base case after listening to me and

58:37

looking at the yield curve is that this

58:39

time is not different yep and it'll

58:41

likely play out like it has pretty much

58:42

every single time since the 1950s all

58:45

you have to do as a retail investor is

58:46

sit back wait do nothing personally uh

58:49

I'm just in gold and t- bills okay just

58:52

the t- bill and chill type that's a

58:53

little different from the 801010 though

58:56

you've yeah so I I'm waiting to increase

58:59

and add to that 801010 by buying you're

59:01

waiting to strike you're 100%

59:04

essentially liquid because both gold and

59:06

T bills are essentially liquid to make

59:08

your Investments to go pick up the pile

59:10

yeah with my cash position you've got

59:12

the the main positions that you built

59:14

but with that cash position you're just

59:16

you're you're building up a lot of dry

59:17

powder you're getting paid 5.5% on that

59:21

and then what happens is I I'm looking

59:23

at the yield curve and it's not complex

59:25

all your viewers need to do is watch two

59:28

numbers the yield on the 2-year Treasury

59:31

and the yield on the 10e treasury and

59:33

subtract that's it that's it and all you

59:36

have to do is is just wait for that

59:39

2-year treasury yield to go down lower

59:42

than the 10-year treasury Now is it

59:43

going to immediately hit the fan no of

59:45

course not there's some timing there but

59:47

once you see that kind of it might just

59:49

dip and then go back down but once it

59:51

stays there for let's say a month or two

59:54

you know that that's the trend at that

59:56

point in time you have to realize that

59:59

that's usually when you have the hard

60:01

Landing that's usually month no not

60:03

within a month it could be 3 months 6

60:05

months something like that but we're

60:06

getting real close time to when the FED

60:09

will have to start and I said have to

60:11

start dropping rates I didn't say choose

60:14

to start dropping that's a big

60:15

difference I think the FED is going to

60:17

have to drop rates they not going to

60:18

choose to drop them and then what you do

60:20

is you sit back you you ask yourself

60:23

okay why is the Fed dropping rates is it

60:26

or why are we having this hard Landing

60:28

is it because of a war is it because

60:29

unemployment's going up is it because of

60:32

the Middle East is it you know why is it

60:34

here why is this happening and then you

60:37

make a decision you analyze and you make

60:40

a decision on what is cheap yep and what

60:42

is expensive and that's the pile of

60:45

money that's just sitting in the corner

60:47

so right now it it seems like all this

60:49

stuff is happening and it's so complex

60:51

but in my view this is the easy easiest

60:54

time uh to be an investor because all

60:57

you have to do is look is just sit back

61:00

you know build your cash position have

61:01

the dry powder be liquid be patient

61:05

watch the yield curve and then assess

61:09

once it's no longer inverted and then

61:11

take action wow that's really

61:12

interesting yeah I I agree with you that

61:15

that's very interesting but you know

61:16

what's interesting Kevin is is I spend

61:19

um I'm very fortunate that I've got a

61:21

lot of good friends of mine uh that are

61:23

in a place called St Barts okay and a

61:26

lot most of these guys were very very

61:29

successful hedge fund managers and

61:30

they've quite literally made billions of

61:32

dollars for themselves and their clients

61:35

and uh in in going there I I've just

61:38

gained a wealth of knowledge and the

61:40

last time that I was

61:41

there I had a conversation with with one

61:44

of my good good buddies that uh was just

61:47

crushed it in Japan and the com bus and

61:50

the GFC I mean he is one of the most

61:51

famous hedge fund manag I'm not going to

61:53

say his name but he's one of the most

61:54

famous hedge fund managers that we've

61:56

had in the last 40 years right and so

61:59

when he speaks you know obviously I'm

62:01

listening and uh we went through all of

62:05

these trades he's made where he's made

62:06

all this money and he said you know

62:10

what every 10 years or so you get a

62:14

generational

62:16

opportunity and then every two or maybe

62:19

three years you get a good opportunity

62:22

and then in between those you're kind of

62:23

doing nothing

62:25

he says but what I found is that with

62:27

those generational opportunities that I

62:30

have had whether it's Japan whether it's

62:32

doc whether it's GFC whether it's 2020

62:36

those have always been the best

62:38

investments of my life as far as return

62:42

but those have always been the hardest

62:45

to buy those have always been the

62:46

hardest to pull the trigger and so I'll

62:49

I'll give you and you can relate to this

62:50

cuz we were both doing YouTube during

62:52

the the pandemic and you know prior to

62:55

that I'm this is my Mantra buy things

62:57

when they're cheap sell them when

62:57

they're expensive buy them when they're

62:58

cheap sell them when they're expensive

62:59

buy them when they're cheap sell them

63:00

they expensive and I'm sitting there

63:02

doing YouTube channel or YouTube videos

63:03

on this daily right but then when oil

63:07

actually gets cheap was it easy to pull

63:10

the trigger absolutely not because

63:12

everyone thought the world was coming to

63:13

an end everybody thought the world was

63:16

coming to an end so you can sit there

63:18

now you know hindsight being 2020 and

63:21

say yeah look at me I was a genius

63:23

because I actually bought but I can tell

63:26

you being just as honest as I possibly

63:28

can be I did buy but it was one of the

63:30

toughest things that I have ever done in

63:33

my life Kevin we can sit here and say

63:35

how easy it is to buy low sell High the

63:37

problem is that when things get cheap

63:40

there's usually Panic yep panic and to

63:43

have the mental discipline to pull the

63:45

trigger is what's most difficult wow

63:48

that's really interesting wow yeah I I

63:50

mean I think the the the only way uh

63:53

because I agree with what you're saying

63:54

I think the only way the FED can weasle

63:55

their ways out of this is if Immaculate

63:58

disinflation and it doesn't come back up

64:00

I think that's the only thing that could

64:01

explain this other than

64:03

that and and just let me remind you if

64:06

that happens this time it's

64:08

different as we all know those are

64:11

dangerous words in inv yeah yeah wow wow

64:13

okay well very well so um how can people

64:17

find you oh they can just look at George

64:19

gamon I've got the Whiteboard videos on

64:21

the George gamon Channel So Good by the

64:23

way people love your thank you or they

64:25

can go check out the rebel capitalist

64:26

Channel Sally on there which is Moody

64:28

the millennial oh Moody the millennial

64:30

now Moody the millennial your friend and

64:32

family member Fred I I try to make all

64:36

this boring esoteric stuff fun but uh

64:39

yeah you could just Google my name and

64:40

you're going to find the Twitter you're

64:41

going to find everything George G thank

64:43

you so much hey thanks for having me

64:45

even though I'm a licensed financial

64:46

adviser licensed real estate broker and

64:48

becoming a stock broker this video is

64:50

neither personalized Financial nor real

64:52

estate advice for you it is not tax

64:55

legal or otherwise personalized advice

64:57

tailored to you this video provides

64:58

generalized perspective information and

65:00

commentary any third-party content I

65:02

show should not be deemed endorsed by me

65:04

this video is not and shall never be

65:05

deemed reasonably sufficient information

65:07

for the purposes of evaluating a

65:08

security or investment decision any

65:10

links or promoted products or either

65:12

paid affiliations or products or

65:13

Services we may benefit from I also

65:15

personally operate an actively managed

65:17

ETF and hold long positions in various

65:20

Securities mentioned including potential

65:23

short position itions however I have no

65:26

relationship to any issuers nor am I

65:29

presently acting as a market maker

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.