TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Audiophile sound UNDER $100. (Old school Sony)

10m 29s2,106 words288 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

now just because you can spend a lot of

0:02

money on a headphone it doesn't mean

0:04

that you should I've got three

0:05

headphones here today two of which you

0:07

can get for under $50 that are truly

0:11

High Fidelity let's talk about it here's

0:13

the three headphones the first one is

0:15

the Sony cd900st the second is the

0:20

7506 and the third one is the V6 now

0:24

something you'll notice is that all

0:26

three of these don't have the stock pads

0:29

I went through yak catalog and actually

0:31

purchased this set of pads myself Yaki

0:33

sent me these other pads this video is

0:35

not sponsored but these pads do improve

0:37

the frequency response of these three

0:38

headphones the cd900st here well it's

0:41

using the yxi St Pad 2 it's definitely

0:45

the most spacious of the three and we'll

0:48

talk about sound in just a second the

0:50

7506 is using the deluxe Yi St pad not

0:55

two the one and the mdrv6 is using the

0:58

St pad ad micro suede I tested a ton of

1:02

pads on these three headphones to find

1:04

out which ones would measure and sound

1:05

the best so let's get into a subjective

1:07

sound we'll talk about frequency

1:09

response and measurements in just a bit

1:10

first off is the cd900st now I already

1:13

did a full video on this headphone you

1:15

can check it out on the headphone show

1:17

I'll have it linked in the video

1:18

description I'll also have all these

1:19

pads and everything down there just so

1:21

you can find out what it is that I'm

1:22

talking about and what pairs best more

1:24

or less the cd900st is an honest

1:27

headphone it's very truthful it does

1:29

have a fair bit of trouble but it

1:31

doesn't extend past diffuse field but

1:34

more than anything it tends to level out

1:36

around a diffuse field curve so a pretty

1:39

honest headphone just relatively similar

1:41

to how the human ear responds it has

1:43

some dips and Peaks throughout the

1:45

response but it's not insane overall

1:47

it's just a good headphone to use for

1:49

things like video editing but I also

1:51

enjoy it the MDR 756 is the closest

1:55

between the three to a true neutral

1:58

headphone it's very similar to if you

1:59

take diffuse field and add a 10 DB

2:01

downward slope from 20 to 20K which is

2:04

pretty close to what you see in line

2:05

with the Harmon research though with a

2:06

bit less of a base shelf these still do

2:08

have very deep extended base it's punchy

2:11

it's Dynamic it's just all around very

2:13

balanced very good then the

2:15

mdrv6 well it's a bit less Airy than the

2:18

7506 despite having well similarly

2:21

measuring trouble you'll see that in a

2:22

bit but what it does have is notably

2:24

more subbase so more Harmon like subbase

2:27

this one is very deep very punchy very

2:30

extended it's not overwhelming base but

2:32

it's enough subbase to uh definitely

2:34

have some kick to it and much more out

2:36

the three so you'll see the way I have

2:38

them lined up from left to right it

2:40

basically is the same way they sound

2:42

leaning towards treble neutral leaning

2:44

towards base it's as simple as that and

2:47

as far as technicalities are concerned

2:48

well they all sound basically the same

2:51

they all have similar Sound Stage detail

2:53

Imaging all of those things and those

2:55

faculties are not wowing they're not

2:58

going to blow your mind but they are

3:00

good all these headphones are decent at

3:02

sound localization so they're very good

3:05

at Imaging pinpointing the direction the

3:06

sound is coming from but also feeling

3:08

out the mic so if you have a microphone

3:10

placed in a room you can really tell how

3:12

far that microphone is from the

3:13

instrument from the singer and so on but

3:15

they don't have the stage to make it

3:17

quite as immersive as some of your more

3:18

audio file focused headphones but in a

3:21

sense that also keeps them honest

3:22

they're not insanely overwhelmingly

3:25

euphoric but basically every song is

3:28

going to get a fair play on them versus

3:30

some of my audio file headphones some

3:32

songs really Excel and some not quite so

3:34

much on these I feel like everything has

3:37

an even playing field and at their price

3:39

well that's really nice to have these

3:42

the 76s and the v6s you can both get on

3:45

eBay for under $50 the pads are another

3:48

20 to 30 which makes this a sub $100

3:52

headphone the same with the mdrv6 the

3:54

cd900st they're a little bit more

3:56

expensive than that but they're also not

3:58

insane any of these I would by used

4:00

because they basically last forever the

4:02

downside is they do have hard attached

4:04

cables but the cables are pretty durable

4:06

and if you really need to you can

4:07

replace them I replaced it on my cd900st

4:09

for a shorter one I would say all these

4:12

headphones are very good for someone who

4:13

just wants something that is neutral

4:15

leaning with one of those three flavors

4:18

either dead- on neutral a bit more bass

4:19

a bit more treble a Clos back something

4:21

good for monitoring definitely something

4:23

for work or for video editing now let's

4:25

look at frequency response I'm going to

4:26

start off with the cd900st and we did

4:28

this one with multiple output impedances

4:31

tested now I also have the raw

4:32

measurements up here for you it's

4:33

showing a diffuse field curve for the

4:35

4128 that's what I'm compensating to on

4:38

these compensated measurements and then

4:40

the actual Target line for the

4:42

compensated measurements is a 10 D

4:44

downward tilt something to note the bnk

4:47

4128 the measurement rig I'm using for

4:49

this does tend to show a trouble Peak on

4:51

most headphones somewhere in the

4:52

ballpark of 10 KZ now I'm not going to

4:54

say that these don't have some elevation

4:56

in that region because they definitely

4:57

do but it's not as severe as the peak

4:59

we're seeing seeing in these

5:00

measurements a lot of that is the rig

5:01

itself on the cd900st here we can see

5:04

that it has decent base so it does start

5:06

to roll when it gets really deep and it

5:08

basically likes to ride the line around

5:11

diffuse field and diffuse field without

5:13

much of a slope just straight up diffuse

5:14

field we see a bit of a recess at 2K we

5:16

see it Peak back up around 3.2k which is

5:19

a little bit farther up than the natural

5:22

peak of ear gain but pretty close it's a

5:24

region that people shouldn't be too

5:25

bothered by it recesses around 6K which

5:28

is actually a fre range I know a lot of

5:30

people are bothered by which is nice so

5:32

that kind of dip back in makes it a

5:34

little bit more tolerable for things

5:36

that are treble heavy and then we start

5:37

to roll off after say about 15 16 khz

5:40

probably about 15 khz now in this the

5:43

red line is normal Alid impedance the

5:45

blue line is high output impedance I'm

5:46

not seeing a difference in frequency

5:48

response realistically between output

5:49

impedance for this headphone despite it

5:50

having a nonlinear impedance let's move

5:53

on to the

5:54

7506 now we see more subbase we see more

5:57

extended base overall the mid-range is

6:00

really solid we do have a little bit of

6:01

a bump around 400 HZ and then levels

6:03

back out we don't see nearly as much of

6:05

a recess around the 2K region again we

6:08

start to peek around 3K subtly another

6:12

dip at 6K which is nice and then we go

6:14

back into the Resonance of the rig which

6:17

still again there's definitely some

6:19

elevated frequency there but it's not

6:21

quite as severe as what we're seeing

6:23

overall the 7506 well it's really

6:26

similar to diffuse field with 10 D slope

6:29

that's a really good result this is a

6:31

very neutral overall headphone

6:33

especially at its price makes it very

6:35

hard to beat and that also means it

6:37

would take very easily to things like EQ

6:40

now on a high output impedance which is

6:41

the blue line here you do see a bit of a

6:44

change so we see maybe a 3 D difference

6:46

between the base and the absolute center

6:49

of the frequency response around 1 khz

6:51

so you'll notice a little bit more base

6:53

a little bit less mid-range and treble

6:55

if you're using this on a high output

6:57

impedance amp um or or a tube amp or

7:00

anything like that but you could also do

7:02

that with an impedance adapter so you

7:03

can plug up a 40 Ohm resistor to this

7:05

headphone in line and get the same

7:06

frequency response effects and the

7:09

higher impedance of resistor you plug in

7:11

the more of that kind of Base shelf

7:12

you're going to start to get and then

7:14

the mdrv6 you can kind of see the trend

7:16

now here I imagine even more subbase we

7:19

have a little bit of a recess around 200

7:21

Hertz pretty solid mid-range throughout

7:23

we have that dip a little bit again

7:24

around 2K less recession around 6 khz

7:28

but it's still there and then back up

7:29

into the treble now overall this looks

7:31

like it would have more treble than the

7:32

mdr7506 but because that base elevation

7:36

it doesn't sound like it the 7506 sounds

7:39

more Airy than the V6 does it sounds

7:41

more full and the treble despite the V6

7:44

also being very close now the V6 is

7:45

really good it's the most harmonik of

7:48

the three headphones and I have a really

7:50

hard time picking between these which

7:52

one I like the most I pull up all three

7:54

of them side by side for you there we go

7:56

and you can see the trend more treble

7:58

leaning straight on NE neutral a little

7:59

bit more bass leaning and that's why I

8:01

have all three in my collection because

8:03

some days I want one or the other but

8:05

they're all a very similar overall sound

8:07

I use the cd900st the most for things

8:11

like playing escape from tarov or

8:13

listening to records or things like that

8:15

for almost all my other listening when

8:16

I'm using one of these three I prefer

8:18

the sound of the 7506 with these yxi

8:20

pads but there are also times when I'm

8:22

listening to something that is

8:23

electronic or very cinematic with deep

8:25

rumbling bass but I want to pull out the

8:27

mdrv6 just to get my bass fill but it's

8:30

nice having a headphone with capable

8:32

bass that doesn't sacrifice the rest of

8:34

the frequency response to do it which is

8:36

a Cardinal S A lot of headphones make

8:37

when you get really good base sometimes

8:39

you lose out on everything else and all

8:41

three of these headphones do balance in

8:44

their own unique way but also without

8:46

making major sacrifices now again

8:48

they're not as exciting as as stagy as

8:51

immersive as some other things like some

8:53

focals and whatnot but it's also a

8:55

headphone that you can get both the

8:57

headphone the pads the TXS the shipping

8:59

all that stuff for less than 100 bucks

9:01

and at that price well it's basically

9:04

impossible to beat in fact I would take

9:06

the 7506 in many cases over the AKG K

9:10

361 and 371 but it really depends on

9:13

what you're after the 361 371 are also

9:15

fantastic um but the build is better on

9:17

the 7506 it's a more kind of time tested

9:20

design and the akg's have had a little

9:24

bit more of a mixed history with their

9:27

build reliability despite being great

9:29

sounding headphones so maybe one of

9:31

these is for you maybe it's not but

9:32

there are three headphones that I

9:34

purchased that I went through measured

9:36

all the various pads on and found these

9:37

pads that work best for them I really

9:39

enjoy them personally and they're going

9:40

to stay in my collection in fact

9:42

recently I moved and for 2 weeks the

9:45

only headphones I had out were these

9:47

guys I'm still using them a lot the

9:49

reason I'm not wearing them for this

9:50

video is cuz I have my 6xx on but I

9:54

think we're going to wrap it up here if

9:55

you like this video leave a like down

9:56

below comment let me know what you want

9:57

to see in the future if you want to get

9:59

active in the community can have the

10:00

Discord or the forum both available at

10:01

the link in the video description as

10:03

always don't forget to stick around and

10:04

subscribe for more videos like this in

10:06

the future till next one

10:08

guys

10:10

[Music]

10:25

peace

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.