TRANSCRIPTEnglish

CNBC Anchor LOSES It Over Fed INCOMPETENCE

21m 55s3,902 words580 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

let's talk about Rick's freakout on CNBC

0:02

and what it could mean for the future

0:05

specifically what it could mean for

0:07

rates in the future because the numbers

0:09

weren't good on the surface when you

0:11

take into account that last month was

0:13

downgraded a bit it really adds into the

0:16

notion I don't follow fed dot plots but

0:18

we all know that this quarter isn't

0:21

shaped enough to be necessarily a good

0:22

quarter many are seeing recession I

0:25

don't see a way to avoid it uh just to

0:27

put a face on this we all see what's

0:29

going on with interest rates you know

0:31

356 in a two year just think about this

0:33

on March 8th it closed at 507 the high

0:36

yield closed that was the highest since

0:38

2007. now we're at the low Shields since

0:40

September 10 year and we did the charts

0:43

what a month ago in about five months

0:45

ago I staked my claim here four and a

0:48

quarter is the high it was the high back

0:50

in October we never came back and

0:52

challenged those fall levels you

0:53

remember Joe we did the Elliott wave

0:55

count it was clearly the high yield

0:57

close but man look at how far we Fallen

1:00

there is this really a banking crisis

1:02

Joe you know what it is it's a Fed

1:05

crisis it's a rate hiking crisis it's a

1:07

crisis built on a crisis we never solved

1:10

and now we have walk backs take backs

1:13

treasury secretaries changing their mind

1:15

is it any Wonder there's all this

1:18

volatility in the markets back to you

1:20

good point people are testing they

1:23

they're I don't even know if they know

1:25

anything about Deutsche Bank do they

1:26

Rick they're going to test it they're

1:27

gonna and they're going to keep testing

1:29

right

1:30

you know first of all we test and we

1:33

don't test for rates on some of the

1:36

stress tests here that's crazy but

1:37

listen listen folks we all need to take

1:40

a step back okay how many trillions of

1:44

dollars of negative Securities we're

1:46

hovering through Europe how could

1:48

anybody be shy I was shocked that the

1:51

news wasn't worse three months ago two

1:53

months ago now we're starting to see the

1:55

realities of it and listen I'm not

1:58

picking on Jay Paul in the fed their

2:00

mission is almost impossible when I do

2:02

get a little stressed though is when

2:04

they ask them questions about the

2:05

government and spending and debt and

2:07

fiscal dreaming and Magic monetary

2:10

Theory and he says oh no I don't comment

2:12

about that you seem to have worked with

2:15

them when the debt was being created now

2:17

they leave us out to dry

2:19

I thought that was 507 we've been

2:21

talking about that so we're that's 150

2:24

basis point right there that is that we

2:27

go 100 do we go 150 too far

2:30

you know I don't know what too far is

2:33

you know another thing we always forget

2:35

is that the signals for the market were

2:37

broken long before covet hit uh we had

2:40

zero interest rate policy for so long

2:42

who knew we became you know uh unable to

2:47

notice all the Aromas in the room and I

2:49

think that those Aromas of debt and the

2:52

fact that we had abnormal monetary

2:54

policy really since the credit crisis

2:56

each other there's no way to tell if

2:59

this is where we're supposed to be with

3:01

rates are not supposed to be I think the

3:03

most interesting trade to watch is that

3:05

three months of ten the way it's

3:07

reinverted because bills have been a lot

3:09

more solid than two years yeah but we

3:11

saved the world twice that you could say

3:14

the fed and and uh you know if it was a

3:16

two-week crisis that's all he had to do

3:18

or three-week crisis that's all that's

3:20

all the comeuppance there was for all

3:22

that extraordinary government help that

3:25

we had that that doesn't make sense

3:26

probably I don't know what it poor ten

3:28

I'm saying that it portends maybe

3:30

inflation comes down that would doesn't

3:32

have to be some disastrous economics and

3:34

scenario but maybe our inflation problem

3:36

comes under control let's see if Steve

3:38

thinks that can we do it that way Steve

3:39

so Rick makes this argument that look we

3:43

were basically drunk off cheap money for

3:45

too long long after the global financial

3:47

crisis we had zero interest rates and

3:51

that is the lower bound of a Federal

3:53

Reserve was zero so money was cheap and

3:58

easy even though we were coming out of

4:01

the great financial crisis where dead

4:02

people were getting loans for homes

4:04

and lending standards tightened

4:06

substantially coming out of the great

4:08

financial crisis basically what you said

4:10

is poor people can no longer get loans

4:14

but rich people can get really cheap

4:17

loans that's basically what you did

4:19

coming out of the financial crisis

4:21

because you led to a substantially more

4:23

stringent uh requirements for Lending

4:27

which ended up increasing the

4:28

requirements to be able to get home

4:30

loans bank loans business loans lines of

4:33

credit credit cards car loans do you

4:36

name it

4:37

and that enabled a 10-year run of people

4:40

with access to cheap Capital becoming

4:43

wildly wealthy whether that was through

4:46

investing in stocks or investing in real

4:49

estate which is substantially easier way

4:51

to do it in my opinion for example had I

4:53

put my first eighteen thousand dollars

4:55

with Lauren into the S P 500 we would

4:58

have turned it into sixty four thousand

5:00

dollars uh by right by around covet so

5:03

let's just say the end of 2019. so S P

5:06

500 for about 11 years 10 11 years would

5:10

have turned into about uh eight to sixty

5:12

four thousand dollars by

5:15

the beginning of covet end of 2019 we'll

5:17

call it instead we put that money into

5:19

real estate leverage that real estate

5:22

with cheap money and took advantage of

5:24

the beautiful type of financing that we

5:26

were able to get after the great

5:28

financial crisis and what happened we

5:30

turned that sixty four thousand dollars

5:32

into over 275 000 well that 18 000 into

5:35

over two hundred seventy five thousand

5:36

dollars so substantially more than what

5:38

we could have gotten certainly with with

5:41

without risk exposure right there's no

5:43

risk exposure in real estate when you

5:45

can rent out a property for more than

5:46

what your payment was then because rates

5:48

were so freaking low and and prices were

5:50

so low then you had no risk basically

5:53

whereas in stocks you go on margin you

5:55

have massive risk all it takes is a

5:57

quick flash crash and you're out so

6:01

Rick's argument here is that we were

6:04

drunk on cheap money for the last decade

6:07

and that now the Federal Reserve is

6:10

basically saying look

6:12

when you guys need to print money we'll

6:14

print as much money as you need when

6:16

Congress wanted as much money as

6:18

possible to print

6:19

4 covid will print it for you in fact

6:24

you know it's actually really funny to

6:25

think about uh I did this uh and in

6:28

hindsight it's like so weird but uh I

6:31

did this uh and then I want to talk

6:32

specifically about going forward uh what

6:36

we think might happen with rates again

6:37

long term uh I I really think it's it's

6:40

uh worth discussing a little bit but uh

6:44

before we do that I want to show you uh

6:47

uh this idea because it's it's spawned

6:49

by what Rick santali just said he said

6:51

look Jerome Powell gave no pushback to

6:54

this idea that hey look you know maybe

6:57

we shouldn't be printing all this money

6:59

no pushback from jpow when it was time

7:02

to print money no pushback when it was

7:05

time to uh tighten uh and now you don't

7:09

want to be real with us about how much

7:10

you really uh have to tighten down how

7:12

much you're basically walking the

7:14

economy into a recession right uh so

7:17

what I'd like to do is quickly share

7:19

this particular tab here let's share

7:22

this and take a take a listen to this

7:24

you should be able to hear this so let

7:26

me know if there's a problem with the

7:27

audio but look at this this was you

7:29

could look at this free money Jerome

7:31

Powell's Halloween and what we did is uh

7:34

we basically did a Halloween as I

7:37

dressed up as Jerome Powell and my

7:40

father-in-law dressed up as Janet Yellen

7:42

and uh we we literally gave money away

7:45

in along with candy we gave two dollar

7:48

bills away to people along with candy uh

7:50

and then of course we made it rain money

7:52

as well because well the money printer

7:53

was on right is my son jack uh but

7:56

anyway what was funny and I'm just

7:59

thinking about it in hindsight now is uh

8:01

let me go to the transcript so we can

8:02

get it quickly here

8:03

a print because I print money where is

8:07

it the money we've printed uh French

8:10

breakfast ah yes okay here here we go

8:13

let's listen to just this segment really

8:16

quick

8:19

come on

8:24

all right come on

8:28

so far we've given away about 80 percent

8:31

of the money that we've printed Janet's

8:33

uh we might have to go back to the

8:35

printer and print more if so we will do

8:37

so excellent do you think we'll get the

8:39

authorization from Congress of course

8:41

Nancy pelosia let us print more

8:43

of course go by and let us spend more

8:45

yes we'll be able to print more

8:48

[Laughter]

8:50

like looking back to this it's just like

8:55

of course

8:56

like of course the writing was on the

8:59

wall like

9:00

they'll just print more you need more

9:02

money we'll just print more

9:04

and and that's really

9:06

Rick santelli's frustration here is that

9:09

there was no constraint on on how much

9:12

we were able to print and now we are

9:15

having to pay for that and the question

9:17

is is it really possible uh as as uh you

9:21

know the other CNBC anchors mentioned

9:23

that we could just go through a little

9:25

short period of pain and then all of the

9:28

money printing that we did and the pain

9:30

we had to go through basically pays for

9:33

that inflation in a very short period of

9:35

time

9:36

Maybe and that's the question see if

9:40

you're wondering about recession you

9:42

have to ask yourself this we were

9:43

talking about this yesterday

9:45

uh the team and I I asked

9:48

look if a normal recession is a decline

9:51

in GDP of half of a percent to maybe

9:54

negative two percent if that's a normal

9:55

recession right

9:57

let me ask you this how bad would a

9:59

recession be if GDP contracted 10

10:02

percent

10:03

really bad right that's the assumption

10:05

but wait a minute

10:07

you have to ask the question correctly

10:08

how long

10:10

let me ask you this

10:12

could you get through a 10 contraction

10:15

in GDP a massive recession

10:18

for a month

10:21

probably you'll just spend through it

10:24

okay could you get through it for three

10:27

months

10:29

probably just spend through it could you

10:31

get through it for a year

10:33

probably not 10 contraction would be

10:36

devastating the amount of job loss would

10:37

be insane

10:39

now

10:40

where are we today well we're not going

10:42

to face a 10 GDP contraction but the

10:46

question is how long does the recession

10:49

last

10:50

because it's almost a foregone

10:52

conclusion now that the recession is

10:54

going to happen Jerome Powell's

10:56

recession indicator is flashing

10:58

massively red and it's basically

11:01

screaming at us saying we are going into

11:04

a deep dark recession and that indicator

11:07

is actually right here on screen now

11:10

Powell's curve says recession is

11:12

confirmed gap between current and future

11:15

short-term rates signals steep Cuts

11:18

coming in interest rates and a massive

11:21

uh inversion here of the yield curve

11:23

this yield curve inversion we have not

11:25

seen since the.com recession

11:29

now this inversion is the difference

11:31

between the three month

11:33

treasury yield which is around 4.5 ish

11:36

right now and the uh a 10-year treasury

11:39

yield which is around 3.3 that means

11:41

people are demanding a higher yield on

11:43

their money today than they are for the

11:45

next 10 years that's because we think

11:47

inflation is going to remain hot for the

11:49

next you know certainly at least three

11:51

months but potentially even more so

11:53

people are demanding more of a premium

11:55

and that's why you have this inversion

11:56

of the yield curve now the only way you

11:58

can explain away well there are two ways

12:00

you can explain a weighted version of

12:01

the yield curve one you can say well

12:04

that's reasonable if inflation goes down

12:06

of course people are going to expect a

12:07

higher rate today because they have to

12:08

get through this period of inflation so

12:10

they'll expect a higher rate now and

12:11

then a lower rate in the future that's

12:13

why the yield curve is inverted because

12:14

there's High inflation we didn't have

12:16

high inflation in 2000.

12:17

the problem with that thesis is pretty

12:19

much every time the 310 has inverted in

12:22

the past

12:23

it's led to a recession within the next

12:24

18 months and so now the question

12:26

becomes how long is that recession going

12:28

to be and how much pain are we going to

12:30

suffer well let me tell you my base case

12:33

and then uh let's go to the worst case

12:37

scenario

12:38

so base case scenario is that we have a

12:42

massive amount of disinflation that

12:44

comes from Housing Services

12:46

this summer

12:48

that combines with goods disinflation

12:51

and the start

12:54

of services X housing disinflation

12:57

that's like labor hotels Hospitality

13:00

whatever and come July August September

13:05

we start having potentially even

13:07

negative prints of inflation and

13:10

month-over-month prints those would be

13:11

year-over-year likely negative but month

13:13

over month rents hopefully close to zero

13:15

point one point two percent acceptable

13:18

as long as we have that sort of

13:21

disinflation this summer again point one

13:23

point two percent on the month over

13:24

month acceptable

13:26

then the recession will probably come we

13:29

will probably go into recession

13:31

but the recession might be short-lived

13:34

and short-lived is very important so

13:37

inflation goes away come June July we

13:40

cut rates like crazy as we saw from CNBC

13:43

the rate cut curve as you can see on

13:45

screen here the rate cut curve is

13:47

substantial we expect to be uh one

13:49

percent lower on rates by the end of the

13:52

year

13:52

so massive rate Cuts being priced in

13:55

starting this summer and what happens

13:57

well you end up having a shallow maybe

14:00

two-quarter recession you cut rates

14:02

substantially you turn the money printer

14:04

back on and everything goes back to

14:06

normal in the meantime people who lose

14:08

their jobs or have revenues decline what

14:10

do you do you spend through the

14:12

recession and the stocks that will do

14:14

the best in a spend through type of

14:16

recession in my opinion are going to be

14:19

people and and or who spend money on on

14:21

expensive items uh and uh and high

14:25

quality brands that have pricing power

14:28

in a shallow recession that's my base

14:30

case and I'm putting my money where my

14:32

mouth is now every time I flip-flop I

14:34

send alerts and I talk to specifically

14:37

first course members about all of that

14:39

uh which now it's worth noting if you

14:41

want to join the courses you can

14:42

actually sign up using buy now pay later

14:44

you can sign up for the courses uh sign

14:47

up for as low as 48 bucks a month here

14:49

with a firm and you can buy now pay

14:51

later for the courses on building your

14:53

wealth now uh check those out linked

14:55

down below we've extended that coupon

14:57

code that expired Wednesday was supposed

14:59

to expire Wednesday just for today so

15:02

you could use that buy now pay later

15:03

service if you're so inclined to do so

15:05

but you'll get lifetime access

15:07

the same even if you use a buy now pay

15:09

later service you will get lifetime

15:11

access to the programs of building your

15:12

wealth which is pretty cool so check

15:13

those out linked down below uh most

15:16

popular bundle right now is the zero to

15:18

millionaire real estate investing and

15:19

the songs and psychology of money though

15:21

more people more and more now are

15:23

starting to Triple bundle with the elite

15:24

Hustlers because they want those weekend

15:26

live streams as well so check that out

15:28

uh via the linky down below and you can

15:31

now buy now pay later for those programs

15:33

on building your wealth which is pretty

15:34

cool so again check that out there's

15:36

clarna uh there's a firm there are

15:38

plenty of different options that you can

15:40

now use linked down below but anyway

15:43

that's the base case scenario what's the

15:45

worst case scenario uh which I

15:48

diligently research myself with my team

15:50

on a daily basis to find okay how

15:52

exposed are we to a potential worst case

15:54

scenario well the worst case scenario is

15:56

problematic the worst case scenario

15:58

unfortunately is a situation where we

16:04

have a longer recession

16:06

that is inflation stays sticky

16:08

if inflation stays sticky you probably

16:10

don't want to be invested in the stock

16:11

market

16:12

because even pricing power stocks will

16:15

suffer them

16:16

if the recession ends up lasting

16:17

throughout not only the second half of

16:20

this year but all throughout 2024

16:24

pricing power stocks will suffer you

16:27

will not want to be in margin going into

16:28

2024. uh the start of the recession

16:31

might not actually Mark the bottom of

16:33

the stock market because the earnings

16:35

pain that comes could be very bad

16:38

so in the scenario of sticky inflation

16:40

we would actually not have rate Cuts we

16:42

would uh because remember what the bond

16:45

market is pricing in right now the bond

16:47

market is telling you rate cuts are

16:49

coming the Federal Reserve is saying

16:51

rate cuts are not coming so why is there

16:54

such a difference between what the FED

16:55

thinks and what the market thinks well

16:57

it's it's for two reasons number one the

17:01

bond market

17:02

is looking at leading indicators of

17:04

inflation and is suggesting that rates

17:07

are going to get cut the FED is playing

17:10

a two-folded game one they're playing

17:13

the game for the worst case scenario the

17:14

worst case scenario we have to keep

17:16

rates high for longer or even raise them

17:18

more which means longer deeper recession

17:20

but also if they admit that we have to

17:23

cut this year

17:25

then they might actually undo the

17:27

progress they're making on tightening

17:28

because if the FED comes out and says

17:31

yeah we'll probably cut by one percent

17:33

by the end of the year they're admitting

17:35

to a recession they're admitting to

17:37

turning the money printer back on and

17:38

people go spend willy-nilly again stocks

17:41

will go to the Moon that's what they

17:42

don't want to happen they don't want

17:44

Financial conditions to ease so they

17:46

have to put the hard face on for the

17:48

worst case scenario they basically have

17:49

to lie to us for the worst case scenario

17:51

to minimize the worst case scenario and

17:54

to make sure the best case scenario

17:55

actually occurs

17:57

and then of course I mean the best case

17:59

scenario is inflation's gone tomorrow

18:01

but uh you know then everything goes

18:03

back to normal then you might not even

18:04

have a recession base case scenario is

18:06

shallow recession worst case scenario is

18:08

deep Long recession so so that's really

18:10

what the Market's dealing with right now

18:11

now where do we think rates could go in

18:13

the long long term well personally I

18:16

think in the long long term there's

18:17

actually a possibility

18:19

actually High likely that we're probably

18:21

going to go back to zero the zero lower

18:23

bound

18:24

within the next four years I think by

18:26

2028

18:28

7 will probably be back at zero percent

18:30

interest

18:31

by the end of the decade we'll certainly

18:33

be back at zero percent interest and

18:35

before 2020 2040 we'll probably be

18:38

looking at so God 20 40 17. you know

18:42

I'll be

18:43

I'll be older anyway uh but anyway by

18:46

2040

18:49

we will probably be at negative interest

18:51

rates

18:52

that's my thesis and not deeply negative

18:56

but we will probably be at negative a

18:59

quarter negative a half percent in

19:00

interest rates

19:02

yeah you will get punished for saving

19:05

you think you're making four percent now

19:06

on treasuries is gonna last

19:08

that ain't gonna last it's gonna go

19:10

negative again and that's going to be

19:12

because of the acceleration of deflation

19:14

thanks to autonomy and AI now there was

19:18

actually a funny quote in the stock uh

19:20

on Twitter yesterday it was a Goldman

19:22

Sachs quote that somebody posted on

19:23

Twitter

19:24

and the argument was the bond market is

19:27

pricing in a recession the equity Market

19:30

is pricing in artificial intelligence

19:34

part of that is because of nvidia's

19:37

skyrocketing which I believe is actually

19:40

pricing power saw I bought a lot of

19:42

Nvidia uh in the mid 100s exposed myself

19:45

to a lot of that but uh you know it's

19:47

it's getting a little frothy over here

19:49

270s it's a little expensive out of some

19:52

of the other options that there are

19:53

still not as expensive as a TSM and

19:55

apple though but uh you know it's

19:57

getting let's get let me get up there

19:59

but anyway

20:01

is is it possible that we were just

20:04

drunk on cheap money the last 10 years

20:06

yes that's possible or the great

20:10

moderation is real and this 40-year

20:13

downtrend of inflation and this thousand

20:16

year long downtrend of mature economy is

20:18

seeing declining rates uh neutral rates

20:21

of Interest which means declining

20:23

interest rates

20:24

is it possible that we'll return and

20:26

that all this coveted transitory

20:28

inflation of money printing will just

20:29

end up being trans story

20:31

yeah that is possible that's very

20:33

possible now transitory will end up

20:35

probably having been

20:36

21 2 3 4 be like a three or four years

20:40

of trans story

20:42

but you know when we zoom out on sort of

20:44

the macro it'll end up being a sort of a

20:47

blip transitory but potentially if the

20:50

base case holds true if we go back to

20:52

the Peter schiffian style uh long-term

20:54

inflation then eventually the the dollar

20:56

will collapse which I do think that at

20:58

some point the dollar will collapse I

20:59

think that point is still hundreds of

21:00

years away uh Peter Schiff thinks it's

21:03

you know months away uh or potentially a

21:06

few years away

21:07

so I think then it just depends on on

21:09

your thesis but but my take is base case

21:12

inflation goes down

21:14

you want to be invested because of a

21:16

potential Nike Swoosh style recovery

21:18

where yes we have a lot of volatility

21:19

fears of these banking crises Deutsche

21:21

Bank Credit Suisse uh you know who's an

21:24

ex what else what's the next shoe to

21:25

fall and drop

21:27

uh all wall drone piles still hiking

21:30

and credit conditions are tightening

21:32

which will lead to a deeper recession

21:35

I think that Nike Swoosh recovery holds

21:37

in the base case if inflation stays

21:39

sticky for too long we don't get that

21:40

disinflation we're expecting the summer

21:42

we're screwed and the base case Goes to

21:43

Hell so anyway uh yeah so there you have

21:47

it uh of uh of my thesis and response to

21:51

Rick santali

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.