TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Diary of a CEO shouldn't be this popular

10m 59s2,211 words352 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Wrong

0:00

>> worked. Weird.

0:05

>> Anyways,

0:06

>> angry

0:07

>> problem stamina.

0:08

>> Bad.

0:08

>> Nope. Extinction.

0:10

>> Diary of the CEO is a weird show. The

0:12

thumbnails are often pretty trashy.

0:14

They're lying. They want us to be sick.

0:16

If a nuke drops, here's what happens. A

0:19

lemon will fix your erections. But the

0:22

interviews are actually very

0:23

sophisticated, even life-changing. The

0:25

topics are all over the place. financial

0:27

advice, societal collapse, foot health,

0:30

sugar consumption, celebrities. But they

0:33

consistently bring in millions of views,

0:35

not just once a week, but twice a week.

0:37

To get over 14 million subscribers and a

0:39

billion views on YouTube alone, Diary of

0:41

the CEO has to be doing a lot of things

0:43

right.

0:44

>> So many people copy our thumbnails now,

0:45

for example, cuz they think that must be

0:47

it. So many people copy the trailers,

0:48

they think that must be it. But it's not

0:50

that.

0:50

>> Question is, what is it then? [music]

0:52

For the last month, I went down a rabbit

0:54

hole to try to answer that question and

0:56

break down the invisible machine behind

0:58

the show. [music] And what I discovered

1:00

is that what makes this podcast one of

1:02

the best in the world isn't what you

1:04

see, it's what you don't.

1:09

A lot of people think Diary of the CEO

1:10

succeeded because Steven Bartlett was

1:12

rich and he was famous. Cuz I mean, he

1:15

was rich and he was pretty famous.

1:18

Founder of a marketing empire that's

1:20

become one of the world's most

1:21

influential social media companies is

1:24

the den's youngest ever dragon, Steven

1:26

Bartlett.

1:27

>> But then I found something that pretty

1:29

much proved this wrong. Kim Kardashian

1:31

launched a new criminal justice reform

1:33

podcast this week.

1:34

>> The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have

1:36

joined forces with Spotify.

1:38

>> Addison Rage launched a podcast

1:39

exclusively on Spotify. Former President

1:41

Barack Obama teaming up with one of

1:43

America's biggest rock stars for a new

1:46

podcast.

1:46

>> From 2018 to 2021, Spotify bet the farm

1:50

on the idea that famous people equals

1:52

successful podcasters. They poured

1:53

hundreds of millions of dollars into

1:55

deals with celebrities. But that bet did

1:58

not pay off.

1:59

>> Harry and Megan's estimated $25 million

2:01

podcast deal canled after less than a

2:04

year.

2:04

>> The Obama's production company is moving

2:06

to Audible after a three-year run with

2:08

Spotify. So, while being rich and famous

2:10

helps with I mean it helps with

2:12

everything, it doesn't explain how

2:14

Steven was able to rise to the top of

2:16

the podcast mountain. So, I decided to

2:18

go back to the very beginning to the

2:20

fall of 2017 when Steven records his

2:23

first ever podcast.

2:27

>> The first five episodes weren't really

2:29

the show you hear today.

2:30

>> Every Sunday, I'm going to share my

2:33

personal diary with you, and I want to

2:35

give you an insight into what it's like

2:36

behind the scenes being an entrepreneur.

2:38

But that didn't last long. Around 6,

2:41

Steven started interviewing people. And

2:42

so I went back and I actually listened

2:44

to those early stripped down episodes

2:46

before he had the fancy gear and famous

2:48

guests and huge team. And what I found

2:50

surprised me because even back then,

2:52

Steven was actually a pretty good

2:54

interviewer. He didn't commit any of the

2:55

usual mistakes that beginners make, like

2:58

talking too much about himself or asking

3:00

questions just to sound smart. But there

3:02

was one thing that he got way better at.

3:04

First though, let's look at what kind of

3:06

interviewer Steven actually is. Roughly

3:08

speaking, there are three types of

3:10

interviewers.

3:11

>> Hey there. Welcome to Conor O'Brien

3:13

Needs a Friend.

3:14

>> Welcome. Welcome to Armchair Expert. I'm

3:16

Dax Shepard.

3:18

>> Yeah.

3:19

>> The friend interviewer puts their guest

3:20

at ease and it feels like a hangout.

3:22

Then you have the second type.

3:24

>> Bradley Pets. Thanks for joining me.

3:26

>> It's my pleasure.

3:27

>> I'm quite picky, so I wouldn't have

3:29

asked you if I wasn't in love with you.

3:32

Here we are at Neptune Records waiting

3:36

for Tyler the creator.

3:38

>> The weirdo interviewer cuts through the

3:40

usual boring celebrity talking points.

3:42

It's hard to act normal when the person

3:44

interviewing you isn't normal. In both

3:46

cases, the interviewer is part of the

3:48

show. The friend talks a lot. Joe Rogan

3:50

will jump in with

3:51

>> I don't remember what happened, but she

3:53

started throwing punches at me and I'm

3:55

like, what the

3:56

>> with the weirdo interviewer, the guest

3:57

can be almost boring because the

3:59

interviewer is the entertainment. I feel

4:01

like there's quite fiery energy between

4:02

us. [laughter]

4:03

>> Oh no, don't get

4:04

>> But Steven Bartlett doesn't belong to

4:06

either category. He falls into a third

4:08

type. Part of a long tradition of

4:10

interviewers like Larry King or James

4:12

Lipton, the invisible interviewer.

4:14

>> How did that happen? Why do they hang

4:16

around?

4:17

>> Okay, that's a pretty good question. I

4:19

guess

4:19

>> when the spaceship lands, how do they

4:22

communicate?

4:24

>> That's a very good question. I like

4:26

that.

4:26

>> This type of interviewer is a magic

4:28

trick. When it's done really well, all

4:30

you see is the guest. Under the surface,

4:32

though, there's a lot going on. So,

4:34

let's get into that.

4:38

>> When you listen to Steven's interviews

4:39

with celebrities these days, his opening

4:41

is almost always the same.

4:42

>> Louie, to understand you, what is the

4:46

earliest context that I need? Trevor,

4:48

what are the most important things that

4:49

I need to understand about your earliest

4:51

years? For you to be the way that you

4:53

are, there must be some kind of early

4:54

context.

4:55

>> So, this doesn't seem that remarkable.

4:56

It's a pretty obvious starting point,

4:58

but look at how he used to ask this

5:00

question. This is the transcript from

5:02

one of Steven's early interviews before

5:04

he was even on YouTube. Look at how long

5:06

it takes him to ask the first question.

5:08

>> Tom, thank you so much for inviting us

5:10

into

5:13

your content as well is hugely

5:14

inspiring.

5:16

Inspiration and knowledge.

5:19

So, my question, I guess it where did

5:21

you come from?

5:22

>> It takes him 44 seconds just to get that

5:24

question out. Now, it only takes them 5

5:26

seconds. But that's not the only

5:27

difference. If you ever listen to some

5:29

of the great Invisible interviewers,

5:31

it's not just how tight their questions

5:32

are, it's also the focus. Remember the

5:35

question Stephen asked?

5:36

>> Where did you come from?

5:37

>> Listen to how confused his guest is by

5:39

that question. [sighs]

5:40

>> Where did I come from? Well, I grew up

5:42

in Tacoma, Washington.

5:44

>> Um, so

5:46

>> respectfully, nobody cares about that.

5:49

And so, Steven changed the question so

5:51

that it nudges people into a more

5:52

interesting answer. What do I need to

5:54

know about your earliest context to

5:56

understand you now?

5:59

[singing]

6:00

All right, so the questions got tighter.

6:01

They got better. But there's another key

6:04

to the invisible interviewer.

6:05

>> Research, research, research, research,

6:07

study, study, study, study.

6:08

>> Research has always been a huge part of

6:10

any interview. The more you know about a

6:12

person, the more interesting answers you

6:14

get. Even Joe Rogan, who is probably one

6:16

of the chillest interviewers, still does

6:18

a lot of research. If I have uh an

6:21

important subject and I don't understand

6:23

it too much, I'll read someone's book,

6:25

watch documentary. I love things like

6:27

the UFO subjects because I don't have to

6:28

do any preparation.

6:29

>> But the king of research has to be

6:32

>> guns Garcia.

6:38

>> Yo, he know too much.

6:39

>> Narwir, HOW

6:40

>> HOW THE [ __ ] do you know that?

6:42

>> Wow. How the [ __ ] do you know about

6:44

>> Yeah, how do you know?

6:45

>> You got a hell of a research, bro. So,

6:47

let's look at how Diary of a CEO does

6:49

their research. One way to understand

6:50

what makes the show special is to listen

6:53

to other interviews their guests did.

6:54

Take this mafia boss. He'd been

6:56

interviewed dozens of times before he

6:57

went on Diary of a CEO. His most popular

6:59

interview was probably this one on

7:01

BuzzFeed. And the most viral moment in

7:03

that video,

7:04

>> never have I ever killed someone. Oh

7:06

boy.

7:07

>> It was the most watched, most commented

7:09

on. But the answer he gives is honestly

7:11

pretty lame and generic.

7:13

>> I will tell you this, that life is a

7:14

very violent life. Murder in that life

7:17

was taken very seriously.

7:18

>> I'm pretty sure we all know that murder

7:19

is taken seriously in mob life. I mean,

7:23

I've seen movies. So, people were

7:26

interested in the topic, but the

7:27

interview didn't really deliver. And so,

7:28

when Steven interviews him, he makes

7:30

sure to ask him three probing questions

7:33

just to try to get him to talk as much

7:34

as possible about that moment that he

7:36

knows people are interested in.

7:38

>> You've never talked about having to kill

7:40

someone, have you?

7:41

>> No.

7:42

>> Why is that? It's just not a subject I

7:44

care to get into. You know,

7:46

>> when I when I read that, I thought maybe

7:47

it's because there's some might be legal

7:48

retribution, but I wondered why.

7:50

>> It's honestly totally worth watching. I

7:52

mean, at one point he says,

7:54

>> "I don't have immunity for anything that

7:55

I've done in the past."

7:57

>> I'm just going to say that definitely

7:59

means he didn't not not do it. So,

8:02

that's one way that Diary of a CEO makes

8:04

sure their guest gives interesting

8:05

answers by watching the other interviews

8:07

and mining them for greatest hits.

8:08

>> I was thinking about Lewis House and you

8:11

had a conversation with him. is

8:12

something that I've heard you talk about

8:13

before. I've heard you say before that

8:15

the most important the things I heard

8:16

you talk about are I heard you talk

8:17

about this sort of

8:18

>> and that's the second technique Stephen

8:20

uses as the invisible interviewer. I

8:22

kind of think of it as the rock concert

8:24

technique because he's basically

8:25

figuring out what the guest's greatest

8:27

hits are and then structuring the

8:29

interview so they can play those

8:30

answers. But even the best answers don't

8:32

matter if people click away. And that's

8:35

where retention comes in.

8:40

There's a lot of complicated theories

8:41

out there about retention, but if you

8:43

just replace retention with attention,

8:46

you'd understand more than 99% of

8:48

people. What I noticed about Diary of a

8:49

CEO is that even if I wasn't that

8:51

interested in the topic or the guest,

8:53

I'd pay attention to most of the 2-hour

8:55

long episode. But when I listened to a

8:56

lot of other podcasts, sometimes I'd

8:58

find myself zoning out. And it wasn't

9:00

until I actually watched a Diary of a

9:01

CEO episode that I understood what was

9:03

going on. This is what the chapters look

9:05

like for an average episode. probably

9:07

doesn't look that significant until you

9:08

compare it to what other podcasts look

9:10

like. Lewis House averages five minutes

9:12

per chapter. My First Million clocks in

9:15

around four. Chris Williamson is

9:16

averaging 10 minutes per chapter. But

9:18

Diary of a CEO is averaging 2 minutes

9:21

per idea. And that's the third technique

9:23

Steven's using as an invisible

9:24

interviewer. Without anyone realizing

9:26

it, he's subtly moving people along the

9:28

breadcrumb trail of ideas.

9:30

>> Say I was trying to sell you something.

9:32

What is it that you think you know that

9:34

the average person doesn't know about?

9:35

If you have a system or a framework,

9:38

>> 2 minutes per idea means that each

9:39

section is close to the length of a

9:41

YouTube short. So, people aren't really

9:43

watching a 2-hour interview. They're

9:44

watching a playlist of carefully chosen,

9:47

carefully paced clips.

9:49

Those are just some of the techniques

9:51

that Steven Bartlett uses to make Diary

9:53

of a CEO one of the most listened to

9:55

podcasts [music] in the world. But

9:57

here's the thing. As good as Steven's

9:59

interviews are, [music] and they are

10:00

really good, it doesn't matter if nobody

10:03

knows about them. And that's when I

10:04

stumbled upon one of the weirdest parts

10:06

about Diary of the CEO. Over the years,

10:09

[music] Steven has had some pretty

10:10

famous guests on.

10:11

>> Oh boy,

10:12

>> I know a scam when I see one.

10:13

>> Fun question.

10:15

>> But one night, I started looking at

10:16

their top 10 most popular episodes, and

10:18

I realized something. Almost none of

10:20

them are the famous guests. These videos

10:22

all got tens of millions of views. Yet,

10:25

it's one of the most random collections

10:26

of people I've seen in a while. I mean,

10:29

look at this guy. I've never heard of

10:30

him before. Yet, he got more views than

10:32

the world's biggest YouTube star, one of

10:34

the most famous actors, and the highest

10:36

paid comedian all put together. So, the

10:38

question is, how is Diary of a CEO

10:40

convincing millions of people to click

10:42

on someone they'd never heard of before?

10:45

This is obviously pretty far down the

10:46

rabbit hole, but if you're interested in

10:48

it, I put together what I figured out

10:49

about their thumbnails in a PDF below.

10:51

For something totally different, watch

10:53

this. For something similar, click on

10:55

this.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.