Trump & CIA *JUST* Found Ayatollah | Demand 'SURRENDER' from Iran

conflict. The president posting just in

the last few moments on True Social that

we know exactly, he says, where the

so-called Supreme Leader is hiding. He

is an easy target, but it is safe there.

We are not going to take him out, kill,

at least not for now. But we don't want

missiles shot at civilians or American

soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.

Thank you for your attention. He went on

in a second post to post, "Unconditional

surrender in all caps." Scott, both of

those coming just a few minutes. All

right, so a critical update here

obviously on Iran. Critical update from

Donald Trump on Iran. Trump not only

warning that we have control of the

skies in Iran as he writes, "We now have

complete and total control of the skies

over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers

and other defensive equipment and plenty

of it. But it doesn't compare to

Americanmade conceived and manufactured

stuff." Mind you, he's uh, you know, we

we we're conflating a few things here

because it's not just American versus

Iranianmade stuff. Uh it's also the fact

that Israelis had commandos on the

ground deep inside of Iran able to

launch a simultaneously assault against

their surfacetoair missile equipment

while at the same time enabling uh

Israeli aircraft and fighter jets to

enter the Iranian airspace. These posts,

by the way, I throw them up on uh in the

Meet Kevin app. I sent out a

notification of this uh this latest news

from Trump here. You can get that as

well totally for free. Uh just type meet

Kevin into the Google or Android app

store. But anyway, take a look at this.

Uh, we're now hearing that a cyber

attack uh is hitting Iranian banks and

other Iranian infrastructure. Iran is

claiming that Israel is launching a

massive cyber war against Iran right

now, targeting all digital

infrastructure. And a lot of people are

worried that this is going to inhibit

people's ability to fill up their gas

tanks and actually escape Thrron, which

is exactly what the Chinese and

President Trump are telling Iranians to

do. Leave Thrron as soon as possible.

The US military is now fight moving

fighter jets into the Middle East and at

the same time extending the deployment

of war planes. It's unclear whether this

is to refuel Israeli jets or American

jets or frankly both. But Donald Trump

has also now just provided some other

pretty extreme updates confirming that

we are not trying to take out the

Ayatollah. However, claiming that we

know exactly where the Supreme Leader is

hiding and that our patience is wearing

Finn. Now, why is this critical? Well,

in my opinion, it's very critical

because if we take out the Ayatollah,

it's possible that this turns into more

than just a targeted attack against the

nuclear enrichment facilities within

Iran, which is essentially a war that

the people of Iran don't seem to want to

support. I don't think Iranians are

like, "Uh, yeah, let's risk our lives so

we can enrich nuclear weapons." I'm not

convinced that's what the Iranian people

want. But the Iranian people also want

independence of their own religion. And

so taking out a religious leader, even

though he's become somewhat of a

military guider, the Ayatollah guiding

attacks potentially or authorizing or

blessing attacks, however we want to put

it, I'm not entirely sure taking out the

religious leader would be the best way

to mitigate this war from boiling over

into a larger uprising potentially from

uh you know, sects or groups outside of

Iran, including inside of Iraq uh or uh

inside of Afghanistan or in other parts

of the Middle East, leading to

potentially a broader boiling over. This

has not stopped Donald Trump from

suggesting that we could end up taking

him out. In fact, Donald Trump says, "We

know exactly where the so-called Supreme

Leader is hiding. He is an easy target,

but is safe there. We are not going to

take him out, kill, at least for now.

But we don't want missiles shot at

civilians or American soldiers. Our

patience is wearing thin." So this is

basically if you attack us, we'll kill

the supreme leader. So don't attack us

is basically what Trump is saying here.

But he's also saying in my opinion that

we're trying to avoid this sort of

religious war that could exacerbate this

uh and take it from just an attack

against nuclear facilities which the

IAEA just this morning the International

Atomic Energy Association or

administration, I can never remember

what the A is. But anyway, the IAEA I'm

going to look right now because I got to

get it right. They claimed this morning

Oh, it's agency. I got it wrong twice.

uh International Atomic Energy Agency.

Who cares? Anyway, uh they claimed that

initial damage to Natans, the nuclear

enrichment facility. It was

substantially worse than previously

expected. So, they're actually upgrading

the damage that was conducted to that

facility. Of course, for has not been

hit yet uh with with to the level to

where underground bunkers are expected

to have been compromised. This is where

Israel is really pushing for support

from the United States. Donald Trump

goes on uh as far as uh to say that uh I

believe this is a claim saying that we

are demanding unconditional surrender

now from Iran. It's also worth looking

at this New York Times piece how Trump

shifted under Iran uh pressure uh on

Iran under pressure from Israel rather.

Take a look at this. Benjamin BT or

sorry BT Prime Minister BB was planning

for an imminent attack on Iran's nuclear

program with or without the

participation of the United States.

During a strained phone call in late

May, Trump again warned BB against a

unilateral attack that would

shortcircuit diplomacy. However, over

the last several weeks, it became

increasingly apparent that the Trump

administration might not be able to stop

BB this time. Contrary to Israeli

claims, senior administration officials

were unaware of any new intelligence

showing that Iranians were rushing to

build a nuclear bomb, a move that would

justify a preemptive strike. But seeing

they would most likely not be able to

deter DB and were no longer driving

events, Mr. Trump's advisers weighed

alternatives. One of the alternatives

was sitting back and doing nothing and

then deciding what would happen uh once

Israel attacks. At the other end, we

could join Israel in the assault.

Obviously, at this point, we decided to

sit back and well do the following.

Choose a middle course. Offer Israel yet

undisclosed support from the

intelligence community. Yeah. Okay. As

of yet, undisclosed. We knew this day

one when this happened on Friday. I'm

like, look, the US is saying they're not

involved. I guarantee you they're

providing intelligence. This is

basically the sit back and do nothing

approach, but still provide

intelligence. Right? This is not a

surprise to me that the CIA is all over

this, entirely all over this. So anyway,

uh this is interesting because this is

basically the New York Times making the

argument that oh yeah, no, no, we we are

definitely providing intelligence and uh

it should come as no surprise to anyone.

But anyway, uh continuing here out uh to

carry out its attack and then turning up

pressure on Thran to give immediate

concessions at the negotiating table or

face military onslaught onslaught. 5

days after the attack, Israel launched,

Mr. Trump's posture continued to gyate.

The administration at first distanced

itself from the strikes. Then uh grew

more publicly supportive as Israel's

initial military success became evident.

I feel like this is kind of like joining

the winner after the winner started

winning, but then again, you know, we

were providing background intelligence

for a while. Uh, now Mr. Trump is

seriously considering sending American

aircraft to help refuel Israeli combat

jets and to try to take out Iran's deep

underground nuclear site at Ford with

30,000 lb bunker busting bombs. The

story of what led up to the Israeli

strike is one of two leaders in Mr.

Trump and BB who share a common goal,

preventing Iran from getting a nuclear

bomb. but who are wary of each other's

motives. Interviews with dozens of

officials in the US, Israel, and Persian

Gulf show how Trump vacasillated for

months about whether or not to contain

Netanyahu's impulses as he confronted

the foreign policy uh crisis of his

second term. This is the thing that that

makes me so confusing about Trump. Trump

comes across as so, you know, so blunt

and and you know, supposedly this strong

powerful negotiator, but you know, here

he can't even constrain BB. Uh, in fact,

they they talk about during this

strained phone call, Trump again warned

BB not to attack and and BB does like,

"Sorry, bro. You know, we've made our

decision."

As uh Donald Trump rushed back to

Washington, Trump took issue with an

element of the public testimony of Tulsi

Gabbard. The intelligence community did

not believe Iran was building nuclear

weapons, even as it enriches uranium

that could ultimately be used for a

nuclear arsenal. I don't care what she

said. Trump told reporters, "I think

they were very close to having them."

So, in other words, you've got this sort

of again communication problem within

the Trump White House where it's sort of

like, you know, one hand is saying one

thing and the other hand is saying

another. Tulsi is like, "Oh, you know,

as director of national intelligence, we

don't think they're anywhere close to a

bomb. They might still be three years

out." Trump's like, "H, they were pretty

close." Iran or Israel says they were,

you know, days away from potentially

having 13 different bombs, which of

course the risk is that not necessarily

that Iran deploys them, but they end up

getting into the hands of the Houthis,

terror groups inside of uh Iraq, uh

Hezbollah, or or worse, you know, even

Hamas. Hamas would almost certainly love

to lob one of these. Beyond the lives

lost and destruction wrought, the crisis

has also laid bare the schisms between

Trump's party and those inclined to

defend Israel. Well, that's the other

thing is now you've got a lot of folks,

even Republican senators, speaking out

and representatives like Massie, you

know, demanding that Trump not enter

this war. When Mr. Trump met with top

adviserss at a wooded presidential

retreat in Camp David late on Sunday,

June 8th, to review the situation, the

CIA director, John Radcliffe, provided a

blunt assessment. It was highly likely,

he said, that Israel would soon strike

Iran with or without the US. According

to two familiar people familiar with the

brief, the president sat at the head of

the table in the rustic conference room

inside the Laurel Lodge. There were no

slides, only maps prepared by the

chairman of the joint chief of staff.

For two and a half hours, he and

Radcliffe described their expectation of

an imminent Israeli attack. Well, there

you go. Israel US intelligence once

again on it. Mrs. Gabard uh was on the

National Guard duty that week and it was

not included in the meeting.

Mr. Trump's advisers have been preparing

for the moment in late May. They had

seen intelligence that made them

concerned that Israel was going to move

ahead with a major assault on Iran

regardless of what the president was

trying to achieve. Based on this, JD

Vance and Marco Rubio encouraged an

effort to give the president a range of

options so he could make a quick

decision. Mr. Trump uh met multiple

times with advisers to be on the same

page about what the menu of options was,

and the Israeli leader was about to give

the unequivocal go. BB laid out his

intention at a high uh intentions at a

high level according to three people

familiar with the call. Mr. Trump was

impressed by the ingenuity of the

Israeli military planning. Uh and he

made no commitments, but I think we

might have to help them, Trump said. Uh

yeah, no kidding, which we already have,

right? Not just with intelligence, but

also shooting down attacks against

Israel. Still, the president was torn

about what to do next. Unlike the

anti-interventionist wing of the party,

Mr. Trump was never of the view that

America could live with and contain an

Iran with a nuclear bomb. This is

something Trump has been very clear

about. Iran cannot have a nuclear

weapon. Uh, so this is really

interesting because it it it really it

gives you this deep dive breakdown of

how Trump basically saw his ability to

negotiate start breaking down as and as

much as Donald Trump pitched I don't

want uh, you know, a war, I want a deal.

It's just not going in Trump's manner.

But it is also very interesting because

now you have people like Tucker Carlson,

you know, basically

you know taking this more

anti-interventionist approach which is

this idea of like hey like let Israel do

Israel like we don't have to get

involved with everything. And yesterday,

Donald Trump actually called Tucker

Carlson kooky Tucker Carlson, which is

odd because Tucker Carlson was somebody

who really strongly helped Donald Trump

get elected. And to call him kooky is is

very similar to sort of this flip that

he pulled with Elon where, you know,

where all of a sudden they they were

friends and then they're not. Was it

Elon's fault? Was it Trump's fault?

Nobody really knows. Uh, but somebody

please explain to Kooky Tucker Carlson

that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.

You know, this is an interesting sort of

flip for somebody who's been a big fan

of uh of Donald Trump. And so we'll show

just on screen here. That is Donald

Trump's truth right here. Uh now

obviously I'm sure there's a lot of

information that we're we're we're not

getting in even this very very long

breakdown of essentially where meetings

happened, what happened, what we know

and what the latest is. But the point is

when we get to the end of this article,

we see that publicly and you can read

the this whole thing yourself, but

publicly Mr. Trump was still stressing

the import the importance of giving

diplomacy a chance. However, as of last

Wednesday, there was no indication of

any negotiated breakthrough and an

attack would start the next day. And

this is just the frustrating part of

what we're finding is there's so much

hope for deals, but we're not

necessarily seeing them, whether it's on

trade, Russia, or Iran. In private

conversations, Trump questioned the

wisdom of the decision to attack. I

don't know about BB, he told one

associate, adding that he had warned him

against strikes.

Okay. Uh but as the night wore on,

Israelis landed a spectacular series of

precision strikes and Mr. Trump began to

change his mind about his public

posture. When he broke uh when he woke

up Friday morning, his favorite TV

station, Fox News, was broadcasting

wall-to-wall imagery of what it was

portraying as Israelis, Israel's

military genius. And Trump could not

resist claiming some credit for himself.

Oh, is this where he does the 60-day

thing? You know, it's so funny. We were

live streaming and Israel was bombarding

uh Iran and we're live streaming and

then all of a sudden a message comes

from from Trump that's like I gave them

60 days Israel attacks attacked on the

61st day and it was kind of a way and I

even said this live on Friday. I'm like,

"Oh, this is Trump trying to take credit

again, you know, for like, well, I

tried. They didn't want to listen. This

is what they get." Implying Trump is

taking credit for Israel's attack when

the reality is, at least based on what

we're we're hearing, Trump did not want

this to happen at all. Uh, and only in

hindsight did we sort of get some credit

taking. Very interesting. Uh, and it it

does I mean, there are a few big things

that we're getting from this. I mean,

we're getting, you know, this

understanding that we know where the

Ayatollah is, but again, nobody's really

talking about this, at least this is

sort of my opinion, but my opinion is

they don't want a religious war here,

right? Uh, and so this is why uh, you

know, attacking the Ayatollah may not be

the most ideal, uh, strategy. That's my

opinion. Uh it's also possible that

uh you've got a Donald Trump here who is

somewhat frustrated that right now you

kind of don't have a very clear idea of

what to do. And I think that's where all

of us are sitting around going, uh,

okay, what do we do now? Because now

we're in a place where Israel's

just going to keep bombarding

Iran for how long? We don't know until

the job is done. Uh and all of a sudden

we're in a place where now we're

hearing, yeah, we've been providing

intelligence to them all along. This is

no surprise. And I was looking for it,

but I finally found it. Take a look at

this. So on the 13th, which was Friday,

George Gammon posted probably a stupid

question. I don't know anything about

warfare, but how does Israel know where

all these scientists are at a precise

time in order to kill them? Well, I said

here the same thing I've been saying on

my live streams. And you can see my

reply here on June 13th. CIA, it's not

that hard. That's the point of the CIA,

right? So, uh, you know, now we have

confirmation that that's exactly what

Marco Rubio has been pushing the Trump

administration to do, to provide

intelligence to the Israelis. So, you

know, now that we have this information,

we can see the cues are rolling off a

little bit more because, you know, it's

clear here Trump isn't really in the

driver's seat over here. He's kind of

playing Mr. Reaction. And, you know, you

have like like remember my goal is not

to shill to any particular audience.

It's just to provide perspective and

then you could do with it what what we

want uh or what you want. But you know,

you have these people like Charlie Kirk

who are just shilling Trump and he posts

so freaking much on here. But here,

Trump was elected for moments like this

is what he posts yesterday.

Uh and then I've seen this movement

before. People freak out. People believe

halftruths online. Freak out even more.

And then Trump ends up being right. And

all he does is shill for Trump. And I

think it just sort of neglects to

recognize that there's a lot more going

on here. Like maybe Donald Trump doesn't

actually know what to do right now. And

that does create some level of

uncertainty because this is to some

extent out of the hands of Donald Trump.

Now we've we've armed Israel for the

last years. I mean actually decades

really. Trump won uh Biden and

otherwise. Israel's got a lot of weapons

and support from us and now they're

utilizing it for the purposes that they

think are best and there's little that

can be done to stop Israel and the

United States certainly is in a position

to say that they're not going to support

Israel. They would always take the side

of Israel. Uh you know the question is

what our involvement is now going to

sort of devolve into. And it's

interesting because it just goes to show

that we are not the ones in the driver's

seat. Ken says, "I'm curious about all

of those reactors handling the

explosions. I think there's going to be

radiation everywhere or leaks

everywhere. Uh not so nice

accountability problem people are going

to have. So keep in mind there are

nuclear reactors where you are actively

undergoing fision reactions to generate

electricity.

Long story short, the unstable uranium

uh essentially heats up water to the

point it boils steams. The steam is

funneled through pipes through higher

pressure valves basically by narrowing

the steam compressing the steam into

pipes which then run through turbines

which turn a generator which guess what

generates electricity. Okay, that would

be an example of a reactor. Very very

overly simplified explanation of a

reactor. Uh what what Iran is doing is

really enriching uranium. So you're

taking uranium or you're sorting

separating out the uranium. One of the

ways you can refine uranium over and

over and over again is through a

cyclical sort of recursive process of

centrifuging

the product. And so that's basically

like spinning it around in a vat uh and

trying to separate out the components.

Some of the components go to the outside

of the centrifuge, some of them go to

the center of the centrifuge. And then

now as you separate the product, you

basically get enriched uranium. And the

more and more enrichment cycles you go

through, the more higher grade uranium

you get. And once you get to a certain

level, you can get uranium that you

could use for energy purposes, which

Iran has always said that that's their

goal as domestic energy production. Uh

at the same time, you could keep

enriching this material, taking a

precursor like yellow cake, which is one

of the sort of precursors of uh enriched

uranium, enrich it even further and then

get weapons uranium.

technically uh you know tech bombing the

centrifuges

generally would be less of a radioactive

event than uh I mean there certainly you

know if if all of the sort of a yellow

cake goes dusting up everywhere in the

air it's problematic but it's it's less

of a radioactive event than you would

have from like a Chernobyl crisis right

that's uh that's what we don't want to

See?