TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Trump JUST RUGGED US | Stocks Drop

23m 45s4,198 words611 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Well, it's official. The Bureau of Labor

0:02

Statistics is cancelling the October

0:04

release of jobs data and delaying the

0:08

November release of data until after the

0:11

next Federal Reserve meeting. You would

0:14

think that the Bureau of Labor

0:15

Statistics, if they're going to skip an

0:17

entire month of data, would at least try

0:19

to hurry up the November data so they

0:21

could give the Federal Reserve

0:22

something. But no, as a result, markets

0:26

are not very happy. now predicting only

0:29

a 28% chance that we'll get a cut in

0:31

February, which in my opinion increases

0:34

the risk of a substantial policy mistake

0:36

from the Federal Reserve. It doesn't

0:38

help that Goldman Sachs is suggesting we

0:40

would have had a negative 50,000

0:44

payrolls read if they actually released

0:47

the October jobs data. That is a

0:50

problem. You can see that right here. We

0:52

estimate that the unemployment rate was

0:53

unchanged. That's the rate on a rounded

0:55

basis. However, looking ahead, we expect

0:58

the October non-farm payrolls, this was

1:00

written before they canceled it, to

1:02

show50,000.

1:04

Now, of course, markets would have then

1:06

added back in the federal government's

1:09

job losses because a lot of these job

1:12

losses would have were expected to show

1:14

up in September and October because of

1:17

the Doge cuts in February. But the

1:20

problem is the federal government has

1:21

been one of the last legs that has been

1:23

hiring. So, a lot of people would have

1:26

looked at, okay, well, even aside from

1:28

that, how good would the jobs data have

1:30

been? And unfortunately now with the ADP

1:34

trackers and challenger job reports

1:36

suggesting that layoff increases,

1:39

planned layoff increases are

1:40

accelerating and we're not getting the

1:42

jobs data that would have been pretty

1:44

ugly. You can't help but think,

1:47

especially after Donald Trump fired the

1:49

head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics

1:51

for, you know, politically motivated

1:53

data. You can't help but think it's

1:55

oddly convenient that Donald Trump and

1:58

his new BLS head are just going to

2:01

happen to cancel what would have likely

2:04

been the worst jobs report of the year,

2:07

October J jobs data. Now, of course,

2:10

they can conveniently just blame that on

2:13

Democrats, even though Republicans

2:15

totally dug in their heels, which they

2:17

usually don't do. And then as soon as

2:19

October passed and we were getting ready

2:22

to get towards Thanksgiving, we happened

2:25

to start making Democrats some promises

2:28

convincing, you know, a group of eight

2:29

Democrats to to uh, you know,

2:31

essentially extend the u the government

2:33

funding uh some parts of the government

2:35

all year, some parts through uh the end

2:37

of January. And so all of a sudden, you

2:40

happen to get exactly what Donald Trump

2:42

wants. Monkey see no evil. Nobody's

2:44

going to tell me my job's data is bad.

2:46

Now, you might be thinking, "But wait a

2:47

minute, Donald Trump would want the Fed

2:49

to cut." True, but Donald Trump also

2:52

doesn't want egg on his face with a

2:54

giant negative jobs report. And he

2:56

doesn't want the self-fulfilling

2:57

potential prophecy of what happens when

3:00

companies start realizing, oh, must be

3:02

okay to fire because as soon as that

3:05

cycle starts, it doesn't end quickly.

3:08

Now, of course, right now, artificial

3:09

intelligence is propping everything up.

3:11

I mean, we've got Michael Bur posting,

3:13

you know, another piece on X. Michael

3:15

Bur's recent ex post is this letter from

3:18

1999 where there's this discussion about

3:21

how uh Buffett should buy Apple stock

3:25

which was very early for its time but in

3:28

it is really this argument that you

3:30

really should this is from Michael Bur

3:32

mind you uh you shouldn't just follow

3:34

the crowd and buy things because they're

3:37

popular because there's a limit to how

3:38

much you could pay for a stock and you

3:40

should be aware of those limits. I mean

3:42

this morning for example we were looking

3:44

oh well this was one of the fundamental

3:46

analyses we were doing on the course

3:48

member live stream this morning we're

3:50

like this is terrible you know for super

3:52

microcomput along with looking at

3:54

margins and otherwise we were looking at

3:55

fastly and target and otherwise but I

3:57

mean and cats out of the bag now usually

4:00

I just keep this stuff for the alpha

4:02

report this is the kind of stuff we do

4:03

fundamentally plus technical basis we

4:05

got a coupon code expiring by the way

4:06

for the alpha report meet.com get your

4:09

tax write off likely tax write off but

4:11

anyway We're we're like, "Wow, look at

4:12

this." Listen, just let me read this to

4:15

you because it kind of leans into what

4:17

Michael Bur is saying a little bit. The

4:19

919.5 million revenue or 15.5%

4:24

decrease in net sales was primarily due

4:27

to the timing of several substantial

4:29

orders that were only received in late

4:32

September. So, in other words, which

4:34

they weren't able to ship in time, if

4:35

they didn't get those September orders,

4:38

SMCI would have had an even worse

4:40

report. Like, their pricing power is

4:43

shrinking. Their revenues are shrinking.

4:45

And it's weird because you hear this

4:47

boom because of, you know, Gemini, but

4:50

it makes you wonder, is that boom going

4:52

to continue to be broad-based? And this

4:55

is something we were questioning as well

4:56

this morning. When we look over here, we

4:59

could see, you know, Gemini 3's

5:02

performance. And you can really go in

5:04

two directions here. One, companies fail

5:07

and go bankrupt thanks to Google. Or

5:09

two, companies lash out and want to

5:11

spend more. Obviously, the bullish

5:13

theory is that companies lash out and

5:14

want to spend more. But it also just

5:16

increases the risk that you need more

5:18

deficit financing, debt spending to

5:21

actually get XAI and OpenAI, you know,

5:24

profitable and actually get them to be

5:25

competitive. because right now Google is

5:27

destroying them and they're going to

5:29

have to take on even more debt. And it's

5:31

scary at a time where, you know, really

5:34

gay things are happening. I mean,

5:36

Grinder, you've got a stock crash that's

5:39

happening at Grinder, which is trading

5:41

for a 1.25 25 peg because literally the

5:44

owners of the company that own 60% of

5:47

the company pledged all of their Grinder

5:49

share shares to take out personal loans

5:52

and all of a sudden they're getting

5:54

margin called and they're getting their

5:55

stocks seized and they're getting

5:57

liquidated because they're margining

5:59

against their own company stocks to go

6:02

spend personal money. I hate to say it,

6:04

but that's also what Elon Musk is doing

6:06

with Tesla shares. He's pledging Tesla

6:08

shares to raise cash to try to pump

6:11

Tesla stock by buying some. So you

6:14

borrow against Tesla stock to go buy a

6:15

billion dollars of Tesla stock to try to

6:17

pump the stock to pump up the Tesla

6:19

shareholder base to get them to approve

6:21

your stock comp plan so you could borrow

6:23

more. So you could take that money and

6:25

go invested in XAI so you could prop up

6:28

this bet against Google

6:30

and you're borrowing even more. It's

6:32

scary. It's a lot of debt. It's a lot of

6:34

debt. I mean, we were looking that the

6:36

Grinder folks are literally going for

6:38

bailout financing from a company called

6:40

Fortress. And it took me a a minute to

6:43

remember where the Fortress Group came

6:44

in, but the Fortress Group came in in

6:46

2022 to provide a credit a bailout

6:49

credit agreement to Robin Hood. Sorry,

6:51

Red Robin. You know, the burger joint,

6:53

Red Robin. Yum. Well, guess what? When

6:58

Fortress comes in, it's usually a bad

7:00

sign that we're not ready for what's

7:03

coming. you are not prepared.

7:06

>> And it makes me nervous because again,

7:08

we're seeing more and more debt spending

7:10

for likely what are probably going to be

7:11

these commoditized products. At the same

7:14

time, the jobs data is bad. I mean, 67

7:17

67 67% of you in my live stream refuse

7:21

to pay for chat bots. And honestly, the

7:24

base level chat bots are getting pretty

7:26

damn good. And so now, here we go. The

7:28

BLS is rugpulling us on the October jobs

7:31

data, saying they'll give it to us in

7:33

November, but then that November data,

7:35

they're going to delay until after the

7:36

Fed meeting. So, we're literally

7:38

delaying jobs data another month. So,

7:41

we're going to get good September data.

7:43

This is like this has Trump engineering

7:45

written all over it. Give us good

7:47

September data and then go dark on the

7:50

markets for a month so we could try to

7:52

pretend that everything is fine. But

7:54

people are seeing through this and

7:56

what's happening is they're starting to

7:58

hedge. You know, I think it was in this

8:00

article where we had uh where they were

8:03

saying institutions are basically

8:05

starting to hedge against this. So, mind

8:09

you, I want to just finish the point

8:10

really quickly and then we'll look at

8:11

that hedging article. The BLS will not

8:13

publish October the October employment

8:15

situation. Somebody in the comments is

8:17

like, "Oh, but Kevin, how could they?

8:18

They didn't collect the data." Two forms

8:20

of data. the payroll's data. These are

8:23

job surveys that they keep coming in.

8:25

It's like envelopes that show up or

8:27

electronic surveys. They show up. Okay,

8:29

that still comes in. But them picking up

8:31

the phone and calling that data doesn't

8:33

get collected. So, I understand that.

8:35

But you could release half of the

8:37

report. You could release the data you

8:39

have, but they're not even doing that.

8:41

They're just going to kick the can down

8:42

the road until after the next Fed

8:44

meeting. And so now you're at less than

8:45

a third of a chance that you're actually

8:47

going to get a Fed rate cut in December,

8:49

which just increases the chance of the

8:50

Fed making a policy mistake because

8:52

you've got labor deteriorating, falling

8:54

off a cliff. Donald Trump is hiding the

8:57

truth of that data while at the same

8:59

time demanding rate cuts while at the

9:01

same time he's demanding rate cuts while

9:04

the Atlanta Fed GDP is skyrocketing.

9:07

We're at 4.2% now. Now, how do you put

9:10

all this together? because it seems like

9:12

that's good news that GDP is going up,

9:14

right? But GDP is going up in part

9:17

because trade is plummeting, imports are

9:19

plummeting. Look, Trump global tariffs

9:22

curtailed trade. Data shows imports of

9:25

goods and services dropped 5.1% in

9:27

August. This data comes out very slowly,

9:30

blah blah blah. The problem with that is

9:33

when imports fall, they artificially

9:35

make GDP look high. So I think the

9:38

greatest irony will be that we will end

9:40

up having this really high GDP report

9:42

because tariffs are falling or uh

9:43

imports are falling. So you're

9:45

artificially propping up GDP with AI

9:47

spend and with a lack of imports. And

9:51

the greatest rugpull is going to be us

9:53

actually going into a recession and then

9:55

people are going to go but Atlanta Fed

9:56

said we were like 4% positive GDP. Oh,

10:00

well that's only because of the data

10:02

abnormality of us uh having to, you

10:04

know, basically add back in uh uh the

10:07

fact that we were importing less. So

10:09

that just artificially propped up GDP

10:11

along with artificial intelligence

10:13

spend. Well, that's not great. That's a

10:15

bunch of fugazi. So everybody's taking

10:17

on more debt. The Grinder folks are

10:20

going bankrupt. The Wall Street Journal

10:22

is warning that a private credit winter

10:24

is coming and they say that the leading

10:26

indicator for this is lenders shifting

10:30

their focus on what they call realtime

10:34

covenant changes. They say, quote,

10:37

"There is no better leading indicator of

10:39

market psychology than real time

10:41

covenant changes, which is basically

10:43

smart money fortifying against a

10:45

downturn." There's the line I was

10:47

looking for. So smart money is

10:49

fortifying against the downturn. We see

10:52

this crap brewing. You know, we run uh a

10:56

fundamental analysis daily in in our

10:58

alpha report and we're looking at what's

11:00

actually fundamentally happening at

11:02

Target, for example, and some of these

11:05

companies that are like, "Everything's

11:07

fine. We're going to remodel our

11:09

stores." And then you go look at their

11:12

balance sheet and their cash flow

11:13

statements and you're like, "With what

11:15

money?" It's fugazi. Until these

11:18

companies keep taking on more debt, they

11:20

don't have money to pay for this. It's

11:21

the same at Target. It's the same at the

11:23

artificial intelligence companies. The

11:25

problem is, and I mean, we don't have to

11:27

rehash this, but the reality is

11:30

these private lending vehicles are such

11:33

a scary disaster that you literally see

11:38

that Blue Owl, who is just basically

11:40

trying to scam their shareholders.

11:42

That's my opinion. Okay. Blue Owl got

11:46

pretty much exposed for their scam and

11:48

now they're calling off the merger. So,

11:51

let me just briefly try to explain

11:53

what's happening here and I'm going to

11:54

give you the basic explanation because

11:57

in fairness, I don't fully understand it

11:59

either because it's so convoluted and I

12:01

do finance on a daily basis. But here's

12:04

basically what's happening. Okay,

12:06

there's a fund one and a fund two of

12:09

this owl company, this blue owl right

12:11

here. Okay, their company has lost like

12:14

40% in market value already. So, they're

12:16

already scrambling cuz they're like,

12:18

"Dude, our stock's plummeting." And

12:19

what's happening is they have these

12:21

little feeder funds that are selling for

12:23

less than book value. They're selling

12:25

for a 23% discount. So, the way you have

12:28

to look at this is like this. This is

12:30

what's happening at at Owl. You have

12:33

people are freaking out. Okay? So,

12:35

that's the foregone conclusion number

12:36

one. one smart money is fortifying

12:40

and getting out of these private credit

12:44

plays. Private credit uh winter is

12:47

coming with uh you know uh a

12:51

strengthening in loan covenants, right?

12:55

We know that. Okay. Owl fund one is

12:59

public. Okay. Then you have Owl uh fund

13:03

two that's not public. Okay. This one

13:07

has the right to redeem shares at 100%

13:10

value, NAV. This one trades at public

13:15

value, which is a negative 23% discount

13:19

to NAV. So investors here are losing

13:22

23%.

13:24

And they're dumping more. So that's why

13:27

so investors here are like, "Yo, let's

13:31

quickly get out here

13:34

of here before uh we can't anymore."

13:38

Okay, then Owl says, "Uh, no. Let's stop

13:44

withdrawals. I kid you not. Let's stop

13:46

withdrawals and come up with a better

13:49

idea. We'll redo withdrawals in

13:53

January." Okay? so that way they could

13:54

come up with a better scam. The problem

13:57

is so far their first attempt at a

14:00

better scam is failing. Calls off merger

14:04

between two private credit funds after

14:06

announcement rattles stock. Yeah, no

14:08

kidding. The firm planned to merge its

14:11

smaller non-traded Blue Owl Capital Corp

14:13

into the larger public traded entity

14:16

even as the merger would have meant 20%

14:19

losses. Right? So, they're trying to

14:21

stop the bleeding, but the bleeding's so

14:23

bad that the market's basically, "No,

14:25

like, hell no. F you. We don't want you

14:28

to put a bandage on this. That's my

14:30

opinion. Don't sue me, Blue Owl." Okay?

14:33

It's It's It's not my fault. You have

14:36

>> little PP.

14:37

>> It's not my fault. We are just looking

14:41

at what's actually happening. And I have

14:43

a feeling that if Donald Trump looked at

14:45

what you all were doing right now, he

14:47

would have a few choice words for you.

14:49

They don't know what the [ __ ] they're

14:51

doing.

14:52

>> Yeah, exactly. So, this is weird when

14:56

you put all this together. It's just

14:57

weird. Now, maybe this will all blow

15:00

over, you know? Maybe we'll find some

15:02

new catalyst to go buy Bitcoin. Like,

15:05

the economist is like, "Crypto got

15:06

everything it wanted. Now it's sinking."

15:09

Yeah. Cuz there's there's no like next

15:11

level catalyst is what the economist is

15:14

arguing. Like, everybody's already in,

15:16

right? Okay. So now you have a fugazi

15:20

propped up GDP. You have monkey seen no

15:22

evil on the jobs report where we're

15:24

literally getting rugged on even partial

15:26

data. We're not going to report the data

15:29

until after the Fed meeting which now

15:32

reduces the chance of a rate cut in

15:33

December which means we have even more

15:35

of a chance of a policy mistake. The

15:37

Federal Reserve's blackout window ends

15:39

on Black Friday. So next Friday or sorry

15:42

it starts on uh next Friday. Next

15:44

Friday, the Fed's gonna go, "No more

15:46

talking from the Fed." So, the Fed has a

15:48

week and two days left or one day left

15:51

to try to convince markets actually to

15:53

price in a rate cut, but they don't have

15:55

the data to do that. They're also

15:57

rugpulling the Jolts report for

15:59

September because these are always two

16:01

months behind. So, we're not going to

16:03

get the Jolts report that was due on uh

16:05

November 4th. And we will get the Jolts

16:08

report for October uh on uh December

16:12

2nd, sorry, December 9th, which will be

16:14

the day before the meeting. But we're

16:17

not going to get any jobs report other

16:18

than September, which should be the one

16:20

good one before the Fed meeting. Yet

16:21

somehow Donald Trump wants the Fed to

16:23

cut. Now again, I get it because Donald

16:26

Trump doesn't want the market to sell

16:28

off, so he has to call for cuts and hide

16:30

bad data. It's a little dictator-ish. I

16:34

hate to say it. I thought he was only

16:35

going to be a dictator on day one. I

16:37

didn't vote for Trump. Remember, I voted

16:39

for myself.

16:42

What we That's what I said I was going

16:44

to do at least. Did I vote for myself?

16:47

Did I write in meet Kevin? The only

16:49

guarantee I'll make you I'll clarify

16:51

that. The only guarantee I'll make is I

16:53

didn't vote for Trump. And I did

16:54

publicly say I might write in meet

16:58

Kevin. I can't run for president anyway.

17:01

But anyway, it doesn't matter who I

17:03

voted for. It doesn't. It really doesn't

17:04

matter. Uh I'm 5149. You know that. So

17:08

then you have Zero Hedge here

17:10

complaining about a short-term flip in

17:12

momentum signals,

17:14

which is bad. CTA selling in every

17:17

scenario. I I generally think you do the

17:19

opposite of what the CTAs do, but you

17:22

know, whatever. But look at this. They

17:24

also make this very interesting

17:25

argument. They go, why is it that since

17:28

October, gold is down, treasury bonds

17:30

are down, stocks are down, and Bitcoin

17:32

is down. Everything is going down. Why

17:35

are they going down? Well, Deutsche Bank

17:38

thinks everything is going down because

17:39

the Fed is going hawkish. But the Fed

17:42

can't go not hawkish. Why can't the Fed

17:44

not go hawkish?

17:47

Or or or why can't the Fed go doubbish?

17:49

CUZ THEY DON'T HAVE THE DATA.

17:52

They don't have data.

17:53

>> Data dependent.

17:55

>> But there's no data. The only thing

17:58

there is is

17:59

>> coupon code expiring. Sue coupon linked

18:03

below.

18:04

>> It's because that's why.

18:06

>> Yeah. So, these pressures are likely to

18:10

persist given that inflation is

18:12

lingering above target, right?

18:15

It's not great. Historically unusual

18:17

rally as well and a lot of debt. The

18:20

debt situation is crazy. It's absolutely

18:23

crazy.

18:24

Uh so,

18:28

I don't know. This is all wild and not

18:30

great to me. Now, what I also think is

18:34

wild, but I think is great is that a

18:37

wedge deal that we just bought with uh

18:40

House Hack uh we our our AI finder gave

18:45

it an A score of and we're kind of like

18:47

this is great. We're like reconciling

18:50

that literally where we're putting our

18:52

money is aligning with our AI finder.

18:56

So, I personally am pissed because I

18:58

don't want there to be, you know, some

19:01

market correction. I want this crap to

19:04

keep moving because I want to license

19:08

the crap out of our AI finder. This is

19:11

just like a background demo of the

19:13

picture. Uh, but like this will be

19:16

cleaned up a lot in our actual app, but

19:17

we score properties based on how good of

19:20

a deal we think they are for your net

19:21

worth.

19:23

And so this was an A score and it's

19:25

actually a property we bought and it's

19:27

great because it sort of reconciles with

19:29

like hey this is like our AI is working

19:32

right and so we can't wait to license

19:34

this soon. If you want to learn more

19:36

about that remember to go to reinvest.co

19:38

or houseack.com it's the same company.

19:40

You get 5% yield through conversion and

19:44

100% of the upside of the stock. read

19:46

the offering circular. There risks with

19:48

every investment, but you know, we're a

19:50

real estate back play with uh with the

19:52

artificial intelligence upside. Now, in

19:54

fairness, we're also prepared if there's

19:56

a recession. I was talking about this

19:58

earlier. I wrote this is my Kevin's evil

20:00

recession playbook. If there's a

20:02

recession, we take the $80 million of

20:05

real estate and cash

20:07

and we leverage that to the Well, don't

20:10

worry about what I wrote there. We

20:11

leverage that up which turns into a

20:14

potential $266 million book 186 mil of

20:17

loans at low interest rates which we

20:20

could then deploy into wedges which we

20:21

think we could turn into $40 million of

20:23

gains for the company. Obviously no

20:25

guarantees it takes time to do all that

20:26

right. That would put us at a 60% equity

20:29

or a debt to equity ratio which is

20:31

actually pretty reasonable if you do

20:33

that at like the bottom of a recession.

20:35

We are like so excited about what we

20:36

could do here. Like we think we have a

20:37

giant piggy bank. That's the evil

20:39

recession plan. But I'd rather no

20:41

recession. So, just being transparent

20:43

about that. But the numbers are not

20:45

great. You know, Bitcoin, we got another

20:47

chance to buy under 90,000. I don't own

20:50

any Bitcoin. Uh and um

20:55

and yeah, you know, so I see some

20:58

people, Kevin, why did you vote for

21:00

Trump? Oh, look at the 595 line. Alpha

21:02

report, baby.

21:05

Uh, I saw enough of Trump won that, you

21:08

know, while I knew it I knew there would

21:10

be some short-term enthusiasm for

21:11

business, I als I generally I don't want

21:13

to throw my hat on politics. So, I'd

21:15

rather vote for meet Kevin. But, um, but

21:19

I think some of the the short-term ploys

21:21

for business uh just break what we have

21:24

uh in in in our capitalistic markets and

21:27

just sort of accelerate the bad. And uh

21:30

I I'm not a fan of tariffs, you know

21:32

that. So economically, I think you're

21:34

just you you create a short-term bubble

21:37

that ends up hurting more people. But it

21:39

doesn't matter who I voted for. Like I

21:41

say, you know, I said I was going to

21:43

write in meet Kevin. Uh so I I don't it

21:46

doesn't matter. But anyway, the point of

21:48

all of this is just I'm very frustrated

21:52

because I wanted at least some data,

21:54

right? I wanted at least some data,

21:57

right? That's usually what I see. like

21:59

Ellis says better than the alternative.

22:01

I don't blame anybody for voting for

22:02

Trump because I understand that

22:03

sentiment. You know, there are a lot of

22:04

people are like, "But Kevin, like the

22:06

alternative." I hate that. Like that's

22:08

what that's why I'm like I'm just going

22:10

to write me Kevin because it's like why

22:12

can't we have like a good choice, you

22:15

know? I don't know. Uh what it did feel

22:18

like choosing between two evils. It is

22:20

what it is, I guess. But anyway,

22:22

somebody's like, "Why don't you run for

22:23

office again?" Because I think politics

22:24

is rigged. I think it's rigged and I

22:27

think it's a scam. So, I'm just going to

22:28

[ __ ] on everybody. I [ __ ] on Biden. I

22:31

[ __ ] on Trump. I [ __ ] on Kamla, Pelosis,

22:35

Newsome. I dump on them all. Okay, maybe

22:38

we can like gracefully unite against the

22:42

politicians. But anyway, I'm pissed. No

22:44

data, which means no setup for a rate

22:46

cut in December, which is bad for

22:49

yields, which is bad for the market

22:51

because the data get the market gets no

22:53

data. So, you actually increase

22:54

uncertainty for longer. It sucks. Yields

22:58

are flat on the day.

23:01

It sucks.

23:04

Anyway, that's what's going on right

23:06

now. And the good news is you can still

23:09

take advantage of the Meet Kevin report.

23:11

You get the Meet Kevin report by going

23:12

to meet Kevin.com. Not only can you get

23:15

the coupon code and guaranteed best

23:17

price, but you might be able to get a

23:18

tax write off as well. Get all the trade

23:20

alerts, all the courses, every private

23:22

live stream, the alpha reports. Your

23:24

membership includes it all. and meet

23:26

Kevin.com.

23:27

>> Why not advertise these things that you

23:29

told us here? I feel like nobody else

23:30

knows about this.

23:31

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

23:33

see how it goes.

23:34

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

23:35

much. People love you. People look up to

23:37

you.

23:37

>> Kevin Pra there, financial analyst and

23:39

YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to

23:41

get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.