TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Coming Economic Collapse | Confronting Peter Schiff in Person.

1h 40m 16s19,633 words2,764 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

welcome back to another episode of the

0:02

meet Kevin show today we have the honor

0:04

of coming to you from inside Peter

0:07

schiff's home in Dorado Puerto Rico

0:10

Peter thank you so much for inviting me

0:12

into your home oh Kevin it's great to

0:14

finally meet you in person yes away from

0:18

the zoom screen so Peter everybody wants

0:21

to know your take you've regularly said

0:23

and you've warned about this that once

0:25

the inflation Genie is out of the bottle

0:28

it's not going back in where are we now

0:31

that it seems like inflation has

0:33

somewhat peaked and at least we're

0:34

trending down even though it may take

0:37

longer it seems like we're not going to

0:39

the 70s again what say you no I think

0:42

we're just starting a decade that is

0:44

actually going to be worse than the 70s

0:46

from the standpoint of how bad inflation

0:48

is and in fact last year if you measured

0:51

prices the way they measured them in the

0:54

1970s the inflation that we experienced

0:58

in prices in 2022 was actually worse

1:02

than any year of the 1970s in fact it

1:04

was worse than 1980 or 81. so we're

1:07

already off to a really bad start but

1:10

you have to understand that the

1:12

inflation of the 1970s

1:14

those seeds were planted mainly in the

1:17

1960s with the price caps not the price

1:19

caps that was kind of the first attempt

1:22

to kind of attack the symptoms of

1:24

inflation because remember

1:26

inflation is a very misunderstood work

1:28

and people think it means rise in prices

1:30

it doesn't right the if you get an old

1:33

dictionary an old web search dictionary

1:35

it doesn't even have to be that old in

1:37

the 1970s even 1980s and you look up the

1:40

word inflation and it says to expand the

1:42

you know expansion of the money supply

1:44

expansion is five money in credit

1:47

a result of inflation is that prices go

1:50

up

1:51

but the government

1:53

and certain maybe Keynesian politicians

1:55

that support government

1:57

they wanted to fool the public

2:00

so that they really wouldn't understand

2:01

where inflation came from so they kind

2:04

of redefined it as rising prices because

2:07

the government

2:08

doesn't raise prices right private

2:10

businesses raise prices like you look at

2:12

Elizabeth Warren today when she was

2:14

tested you know a questioning uh palp

2:18

she was you know trying to imply that

2:21

prices were Rising because businesses

2:23

were gouging their customers right

2:24

inflation is not caused by businesses

2:27

this is caused by government government

2:28

expands the money supply the Federal

2:30

Reserve does that in response to deficit

2:33

spending from Congress and so it's

2:34

government that is the source of all

2:36

inflation but by mislabeling it as

2:40

rising prices they can deflect the blame

2:42

but getting back to why we had the big

2:45

increase in prices in the

2:47

1970s in the 1960s that's when we had

2:52

the Lyndon Johnson

2:54

uh real big increase in government

2:57

spending both on welfare and warfare we

3:00

had the actual war in Vietnam right we

3:03

also had you know the Space Race so

3:05

we're spending a lot of money on NASA

3:06

spending a lot more money on Vietnam

3:08

then we get these Great Society programs

3:11

and the beginning of Medicare Medicaid

3:13

and all this and they call the guns and

3:15

butter at the time right we're spending

3:16

and then we they started running big

3:19

deficits

3:20

and where'd the money come from the

3:22

finances deficits Fetters are printed it

3:25

now because they printed so much money

3:27

back in the 60s we were on a gold

3:29

standard and because they printed so

3:31

much money our creditors realized that

3:33

we couldn't make good on our obligations

3:35

to play Gold pay gold because all

3:37

dollars were ious for gold so in 1971

3:41

because there was a gold drain because

3:43

our creditors were taking their Federal

3:44

Reserve notes and asking for their gold

3:46

the official rate was you know 35

3:48

dollars got you an ounce of gold but

3:50

after a couple of devaluations Nixon

3:52

went off the gold standard and then

3:55

prices really just spiraled out of

3:57

control because there was no restraint

3:59

at all on the printing press through the

4:00

70s so the money they printed in the 60s

4:03

they kept printing more in the 70s and

4:05

we didn't really step on the brakes

4:07

until volcker came around in the early

4:10

80s

4:11

but it started in the 60s it showed up

4:14

in the 70s now the inflation that we

4:17

experienced in 2021 and then worse in

4:20

2022 it really had its roots in the

4:23

prior decade wow it really started in

4:26

Earnest in 2009 following the 2008

4:30

financial crisis that's when the FED

4:32

lowered rates to zero and launched

4:35

quantitative easing for the first time

4:36

yeah February of 09 yeah right and and

4:38

so basically from February of 09

4:41

until like March of last year right yeah

4:45

interest rates were basically at zero

4:47

maybe it spent a year or two where we

4:49

got up to half a percent one percent two

4:51

percent you know but it quickly came

4:52

back down and you know the balance sheet

4:55

went from under a trillion

4:58

to what nine trillion wherever it went

5:00

to yeah after coveted yeah exactly right

5:02

and we just flooded the economy with

5:06

inflation right and in fact

5:08

the FED wasn't

5:10

uh you know they said it was honest

5:12

about what it was doing in a way because

5:14

all the FED chairman said that we didn't

5:17

have enough inflation that we were below

5:19

Target right that they the target was

5:21

two percent and we were one and a half

5:23

oh my God this is terrible we don't have

5:25

enough inflation so it was a specific

5:28

policy goal of the FED to create

5:31

inflation because they said we didn't

5:33

have enough of it now part of the reason

5:35

was because they lied about it because

5:37

the CPI isn't honest you generally have

5:40

to double prices

5:42

so if the CPI says one and a half it's

5:44

three but that means one and also if it

5:46

says eight it's sixteen right so we've

5:49

got massive inflation if you honestly

5:51

make it measure the effect is that

5:53

because of the weightings that you were

5:54

it's well I don't even know how they

5:56

calculated anymore but there's all kinds

5:59

of substitution the basket doesn't

6:00

remain the same of course there is

6:02

hedonics where they you know they claim

6:04

that quality is going up right like the

6:06

iPhone now might be a thousand dollars

6:08

price went up but the utility might yeah

6:10

but I mean you know but it's not any

6:13

real better for the consumer but there's

6:15

so many other products

6:17

where quality just goes down I think

6:20

about you know air air transportation

6:22

you don't have to worry about that

6:22

anymore now you're flying around your

6:24

private jet but those of us who are

6:25

still flying commercial you know little

6:27

people

6:28

um you know you you know you have to pay

6:30

extra you want a blanket you want a

6:31

pillow you want to check your baggage

6:33

right but they don't put this into

6:36

the CPI

6:37

you're looking at a ticket fare but now

6:39

they're charging you for everything they

6:40

didn't bring right and of course you

6:42

don't have you know now you have two

6:45

connections instead of non-stop you know

6:47

you know there's all kinds of delays I

6:50

mean so the quality has gone down as

6:52

somebody who's

6:53

flown I can you know test the fact that

6:56

the the quality is much lower than it

6:59

was but you know they don't they don't

7:00

adjust for that now do you think that is

7:02

because of covid and the pilot and plane

7:04

shortage no just an example of CPA this

7:07

is an example of the CPI not capturing

7:10

the degradation and quality yeah you

7:13

know I mean and a lot of companies cut

7:15

back on you know food companies they'll

7:17

give you lower quality ingredients in

7:20

the food you know less fresh stuff more

7:23

processed you know and it goes not pet

7:25

food too you know you they put you know

7:26

crappier ingredients there so there's

7:28

all kinds of ways that they reduce the

7:31

quality instead of increasing the price

7:33

or maybe they do a combination of both

7:35

but the CPI

7:36

doesn't get that I mean I know I did a a

7:39

an exercise back in 2013. just I mean

7:43

you could see the YouTube video up there

7:45

and this was in 2013. and I looked at

7:49

the prices of newspapers and magazines

7:52

because there's a part of the CPI that

7:55

says newspapers and magazines

7:57

subscriptions yeah right and according

7:59

to the CPI

8:01

newspaper magazine prices over the prior

8:04

10-year period were up by 30 percent so

8:08

I just said well let me check not that

8:10

hard to do let me go on the internet go

8:12

back to 2003 and look at the New York

8:15

Times The Wall Street Journal time

8:16

Newsweek you know uh I took like maybe

8:19

10 to 20 of the major uncirculated yeah

8:22

and I just looked at the prices that

8:24

were written on the covers in 2003 and I

8:29

looked at the prices on the exact same

8:30

magazines on the covers in 2013 and I

8:34

compare and the actual increase was 130

8:37

not 30 so the question is where did that

8:40

other increase go marketing but I mean

8:43

it went into the CPI but it didn't come

8:45

out right so I don't know the

8:47

methodology but I do know that the

8:49

Boston commission back in the I think

8:53

late 80s they convinced everybody or the

8:57

government convinced everybody that the

8:58

CPI was overstating inflation so we

9:01

needed to fix it so they got it right

9:03

well they actually did fix it you know

9:05

the fix is now in and now it's

9:06

understating inflation I see yeah but

9:08

the problem is now inflation is is is so

9:12

high that they can't pretend it's under

9:13

two percent but the point I was making

9:15

is the Fed had a policy goal we want

9:18

more inflation well they deliver we got

9:20

more inflation a lot more inflation so

9:23

they were right well but we didn't is

9:25

saying the Fed was right we didn't need

9:27

more inflation we needed it like a hole

9:29

in the head I mean we needed less

9:31

inflation but they were hiding behind a

9:34

rigged CPI to claim that we needed two

9:37

percent and you know where is this two

9:39

percent Powell says that you know uh we

9:42

need price stability right and that's

9:44

defined as prices going up every year by

9:46

two percent right now how is that stable

9:49

this is how like that sounds like

9:50

escalating prices it's supposed to rate

9:52

of change is stable but yeah but but but

9:55

prices themselves aren't stable stable

9:57

prices would be they're the same that's

9:59

stability yeah right but they just

10:02

concocted the idea that it was two

10:04

percent but

10:05

the whole super thin uh number came out

10:09

of New Zealand that's where it started

10:10

but it started as a ceiling it was not a

10:13

Target like we need two percent

10:15

inflation like if you don't if you only

10:16

have one that's a problem you need to it

10:19

was as long as you were below two you

10:21

didn't have to worry the minute it got

10:23

to two you had to do something about it

10:25

so it's almost like your cholesterol

10:27

should be under this level but if you're

10:28

below it you shouldn't be trying it

10:30

exactly exactly but they said we needed

10:32

to Target two percent which I always

10:34

thought was such a ridiculous

10:37

um or the amount of hubris that you

10:40

would have to have as a central Banker

10:41

to think that if inflation is 1.8 you

10:44

could just dial it up a little bit and

10:46

hit two percent like right on the money

10:49

or if it was 2.1 you just dial it right

10:52

back down I mean if if your inflation is

10:54

one and a half

10:56

that's close enough to two why would you

10:58

even like it was even worse with the ECB

11:00

because the ECB remember these Mario

11:02

draghi comments they said that their

11:04

goal wasn't two percent their goal was

11:07

to be close to but below two percent so

11:09

they were targeted like 1.99 right and

11:12

they were saying oh one year I was

11:14

talking about my podcast I think it was

11:16

2018 or 19. inflation in the Eurozone

11:19

was like 1.74 yet they still had

11:22

interest rates at negative 40 basis

11:24

points they were doing QE because they

11:26

weren't close enough to being just under

11:28

two percent right and they were 25 basis

11:31

points away now they're at nine percent

11:32

yeah now they're so far above right but

11:35

what are they panicking no I mean they

11:37

still got interest rates of Two and a

11:38

Half they're not even shrinking their

11:40

balance sheet and you know they're

11:42

there's 700 basis points above their

11:44

target yet they were freaking out when

11:46

they were 25 basis points below but the

11:49

whole idea that you need inflation is

11:51

absurd what if we're deflation great I

11:55

mean no it you know you're looking at

11:56

falling prices but if you go and look at

11:59

the CPI in 1900 yeah and look at the CPI

12:02

in 1800 prices were cut in half over 100

12:05

years so we had falling prices for 100

12:07

years through Innovation yes that's

12:09

what's good you know and everything I

12:11

mean look you got a cell phone here you

12:13

remember how much the first cell phone

12:15

cost the first phone I am was like a

12:17

T-Mobile razor or something

12:19

like like I remember you remember I

12:22

don't know if you ever saw Wall Street

12:23

no yeah yeah yeah he's got this golden

12:25

Deco right yeah and that and that thing

12:27

back then in the in the mid 80s that was

12:30

like a two or three thousand dollar

12:31

phone oh my gosh you could have bought I

12:33

bought my first car in 19 uh 80. it was

12:37

an MGB I paid 3 700 so a cell phone was

12:41

about a car right how many people had

12:44

them right

12:45

why do ever why does everybody have cell

12:47

phones now and prices come down yes

12:49

that's a good thing because they they

12:51

try to tell us that well if prices come

12:53

down no one's going to buy anything no

12:55

that's how you get more people to buy it

12:57

sure more people have TVs more people

12:59

have cars like comparing today to the

13:01

50s the standard of living would you

13:03

argue has gone up no I don't know it's

13:05

gone down but the price of TVs have gone

13:08

down so it's true okay people have a lot

13:10

more TVs today right so if you grow up

13:12

in a house you got a TV in every room

13:14

but your mom's not there because she's

13:16

working two jobs and you never you know

13:17

because back in the 1950s if you had a

13:21

guy went to high school yeah he could

13:23

support his wife four kids

13:25

buy a car save for retirement no credit

13:28

cards I mean you know you people had I

13:31

think a higher quality of life before

13:33

government got so big but the free

13:35

market the whole time the government has

13:37

been undermining our standard of living

13:39

the free market has been doing what it

13:41

can to improve it and so the technology

13:43

has gotten better and so yeah we have we

13:46

have uh more computers we have more

13:48

cameras of course they're all made in

13:49

Japan or China now we used to make all

13:51

the cameras ourselves you know we still

13:53

have an industry before the government

13:55

destroyed that

13:57

um but the idea that we need prices to

13:59

go up is just completely absurd you know

14:01

that we when prices go down people's

14:04

standard of living goes up everybody

14:06

wants to buy more stuff and the way you

14:09

buy more stuff is the price of the stuff

14:10

goes down to anybody like if you said to

14:13

somebody what do you want do you want uh

14:17

um food prices to go up or down right do

14:20

you want your rent to go up or down sure

14:22

right do you want uh you know Health

14:24

Care to be more expensive or less

14:25

expensive right everybody wants price to

14:27

go down and then they might then they'll

14:29

try to say well but if you're uh a

14:32

businessman you want higher prices sure

14:35

no you don't you want higher margins

14:37

right you want lower prices and lower

14:39

costs because every businessman knows I

14:42

can sell more if I can lower my price

14:45

every businessman is trying to lower

14:47

their price so they can have greater

14:50

volume so the key for a business is the

14:53

difference between what it costs me to

14:55

produce something and what I can sell it

14:57

for so businesses weren't hurt by

15:00

Falling prices think about all the money

15:02

that these cell phone companies are

15:04

making selling false cell phones now at

15:06

lower price points than when they were

15:07

so expensive you know you had to be you

15:09

know Gordon gecko to afford to buy one

15:11

right right what would you say to uh the

15:15

economic theory that if prices don't go

15:17

up then individuals might not be

15:19

incentivized to ever buy they would just

15:20

wait to buy and that potentially then

15:23

lowering GDP and therefore maybe the two

15:24

percent Target encouraging no well I

15:27

mean if that were true nobody would own

15:29

a phone they'd be waiting for the price

15:31

to fall indefinitely but we have always

15:32

been above uh a zero in terms of

15:35

inflating prices no but no but I'm

15:37

talking about prices for phones

15:39

themselves sure computers right they go

15:41

down I see over the time okay that your

15:43

question yeah so there's something

15:45

called the time value of money sure so

15:47

let's say there's a phone and it costs a

15:51

thousand dollars and I know that if I

15:55

just wait a year I could buy that same

15:56

phone used for like eight hundred

15:58

dollars sure

16:00

why wait a year

16:01

full health maybe not you might want the

16:04

utility now yes exactly now if I can't

16:06

afford the thousand dollars I will wait

16:08

but if I have the money I'm not gonna

16:11

wait a whole year to you know and

16:14

obviously that doesn't that's not the

16:15

case with food I mean if you think the

16:17

price of food is going to go down you're

16:18

not going to starve yourself waiting for

16:20

a cheaper Burger sure you're just you're

16:22

hungry you're gonna buy the food and

16:24

what it costs you is what it costs you

16:26

but people don't do that the only people

16:28

who wait for prices to fall are people

16:31

who can't afford like I remember when I

16:34

saw in a store and I remember which was

16:37

you know one of the stores like maybe

16:39

circus City or something I don't know if

16:40

they're in business anymore nope but I I

16:43

went to the store

16:44

and I was probably in my 20s

16:47

and I saw my first high-def television

16:49

set

16:50

and I remember it was like amazing I was

16:52

like this is incredible it's like

16:53

looking out the window compared to the

16:55

stuff I was used to sure now I really

16:57

wanted to buy one

16:59

but I couldn't afford it it was like ten

17:01

thousand dollars right and that was like

17:02

back then when ten thousand dollars was

17:04

a lot of money now of course I have high

17:07

def televisions in pretty much every

17:08

room I got one in the bathroom right so

17:12

does everybody else and then your

17:13

pressure chamber yes I do right I've got

17:15

one in my hyperbaric chamber but why why

17:18

do I have them now well they're cheap

17:20

yes no actually I have more money so I

17:22

actually could afford to buy one if it

17:24

was ten thousand dollars right but

17:27

a lot of people

17:29

who are in their 20s who are at the same

17:31

point in life that I was are buying

17:34

these televisions that I didn't buy I I

17:36

it wasn't that I didn't want it I just

17:38

couldn't afford it and if I couldn't

17:40

afford it at ten thousand dollars if it

17:43

went up to eleven thousand or twelve

17:44

thousand it would have been even less

17:46

affordable right so the fact that prices

17:48

came down that's what helped me from 10

17:51

to say nine eight it wouldn't have made

17:52

a difference as prices come down more

17:54

and more people enter the market yeah

17:56

yeah of course until you reach a point

17:57

where they're low enough you know for

17:59

Mass distribution so you would

18:01

definitely argue the theory that uh some

18:04

inflation is good to be stimulative and

18:06

help reward people who take on debt for

18:08

their businesses and and try to advance

18:10

the businesses sooner you're super anti

18:12

that's all Bs and of course you know

18:15

inflation does reward debtors oh yeah

18:18

but only if the inflation is higher than

18:21

what was assumed when the loan was

18:24

originated phenomenal because there's

18:25

going to be

18:27

hey you're going to pay a higher rate of

18:29

interest to borrow money again when the

18:32

the law the lender knows there's

18:33

inflation because it's going to be built

18:35

into the yield right what benefits the

18:37

debtor is let's say you and I enter into

18:40

a loan let's say I I loan you ten

18:42

thousand dollars sure and we expect two

18:44

percent inflation right and so I charge

18:47

you four percent so I can make two

18:49

percent after inflation

18:51

let's say inflation ends up being 10 I

18:54

was wrong we were both wrong yeah well

18:55

you know I'm screwed and you've got a

18:57

windfall I win because you're uh you're

18:59

not paying me enough interest to offset

19:02

my loss of purchasing power right so

19:04

inflation can reward the debtor but it

19:07

also punishes the lender

19:09

and you know the the real key to

19:12

economic growth and Rising living

19:14

standards is productivity you have to

19:17

have more productivity well where does

19:18

that come from it comes from capital

19:19

investment well where do companies get

19:22

the money to invest it comes from

19:24

savings it comes from under consumption

19:25

so to have a really strong economy where

19:28

you have Rising living standards you

19:29

need to have a lot of savings well

19:31

you're not going to have a lot of

19:32

savings if you're punishing the Savers

19:34

with inflation

19:36

you know or artificially low interest

19:38

rates like we have I mean we don't have

19:40

real economic growth in this country

19:42

because we we punish Savers and so we're

19:44

dependent on the rest of the world where

19:46

they do save right that's why all this

19:48

we have these huge trade deficits

19:49

because we don't have the industrial

19:52

capacity because we didn't have the

19:53

savings to do the capital Investments uh

19:56

to build the stuff ourselves now we we

19:58

happen to issue the world's Reserve

19:59

currency for now and so the rest of the

20:02

world is dumb enough to exchange all the

20:05

stuff they make for the paper we print

20:07

is your thesis then that at some point

20:09

in the future the dollar will no longer

20:11

be the reserve currency or I mean

20:13

historically every currency to have ever

20:15

existed has has gone to zero has gone

20:17

bankrupt and can put do you expect that

20:18

to happen for the dollar as well yeah

20:20

well there hasn't been a fiat currency

20:23

in the history of the world that hasn't

20:25

gone to zero now

20:27

the Fiat currencies that exist today

20:29

haven't got the zero yet right but

20:32

they're also newer right yeah but the

20:33

ones that are around 200 years ago 300

20:35

years ago they're they're pretty much

20:37

all gone but real money is you know

20:40

Eternal I mean gold I mean if you find a

20:42

gold coin that was you know lost by some

20:45

Roman Centurion who dropped it somewhere

20:48

and you find that

20:50

you know gold coin you could buy pretty

20:52

much what what you know you could buy

20:55

back then right I think Roman toga was

20:57

about an ounce of gold a really nice one

20:59

wow and now you can get a pretty nice

21:00

suit for an ounce of gold but if you

21:02

find some paper money I don't think they

21:04

had any back then but if you find some

21:06

paper money from some bankrupt Nation

21:08

from a few hundred years ago it's worth

21:10

nothing I mean maybe if it's in pristine

21:12

condition maybe it's like a collectible

21:14

or something but it doesn't have any

21:16

real well your expectation is we might

21:18

go into that sort of Direction well I am

21:20

sure

21:21

that far enough into the future what we

21:25

currently use as a substitute for money

21:27

Federal Reserve those will have zero

21:29

value to anybody

21:31

the question is how long is that process

21:33

going to take right two years ten years

21:35

100 years well I'm sure they'll have

21:36

value in two years ten years 100 years

21:39

tough to say okay but how much value I

21:41

mean if you look at what value the paper

21:43

currency has today versus 100 years ago

21:46

sure it's lost 99 of its value so

21:49

something that costs you a penny 100

21:52

years ago you need a dollar to buy it

21:54

you know something that costs you a

21:56

dollar you need a hundred dollars that's

21:57

basically but in terms of gold or silver

22:00

the prices are relatively constant but

22:04

what's more I think important is not

22:06

whether the dollar is going to have any

22:08

value

22:09

but how much of its value will it lose

22:11

and how quickly and a lot of that is a

22:15

function of how much longer the dollar

22:17

will stay as the primary Reserve

22:19

currency

22:20

that's a 64 trillion dollar question I

22:23

mean do you think that aligns with how

22:24

long the United States might be the

22:25

largest economy in the world

22:28

well I I think China is probably I'm not

22:32

sure what to I mean maybe by GDP we're

22:34

still bigger right right

22:36

um than China

22:38

but you know on a purchasing power

22:40

parity basis probably not I mean you

22:42

know but yeah I I do think by the end of

22:45

this decade yeah China will be a larger

22:48

economy the United States in total

22:51

um and that aligns with your 10 years

22:53

yeah I mean and it may well be that

22:56

before the end of this decade the dollar

22:58

is no long Reserve currency I mean you

23:00

can see

23:01

a lot of Nations including China you

23:04

know Russia India uh even cut even in

23:07

the Middle East now uh moving away from

23:09

the dollar trying to reorient their

23:12

their trade in other currencies

23:16

um and I think what we've done recently

23:18

with the sanctions on Russia only

23:20

highlights to the world how important it

23:22

is to de-dollarize I mean they should

23:25

have done it anyway because they mean

23:26

it's distorting the whole global economy

23:28

where everybody is warehousing dollars

23:30

and the longer the dollar Remains The

23:32

Reserve currency the bigger our

23:34

imbalance has become we have record

23:36

trade deficits we have you know we're

23:38

the world's biggest detonation a huge

23:39

card account deficits all this is being

23:42

fueled by the dollars Reserve currency

23:44

status and so the longer it Remains The

23:46

Reserve currency the bigger our external

23:48

liabilities become

23:50

and the more money the rest of the world

23:52

is going to lose when we default sure

23:54

right because right now we're all

23:55

talking about oh we can't default on the

23:57

debt

23:58

right well we can't pay the debt either

24:00

that's one thing right so we will

24:02

eventually default the question is how

24:05

we're more likely to default through

24:07

inflation than legitimately you know not

24:11

paying because that is what's going to

24:13

happen what would that look like because

24:16

we expect obviously the debt ceiling to

24:18

be raised we can't say it with certainty

24:20

but we expect that of course it will be

24:21

raised so what you know what do you mean

24:23

then yeah how do we default but the the

24:25

problem is the debt the ceiling in

24:28

theory would be part of the solution the

24:30

problem is they raised the ceiling

24:31

whenever we get there so there really

24:33

isn't a ceiling but

24:36

when they say we have to raise the debt

24:38

ceiling because we have to pay our bills

24:39

right that's not why we want to raise

24:41

the debt ceiling if we paid our bills we

24:43

wouldn't have any debt the reason they

24:45

want to raise the debt ceiling is so we

24:46

can continue not paying our bills right

24:49

we go into debt instead of paying our

24:51

bills right so if we didn't raise the

24:53

debt ceiling we'd be forced to pay our

24:55

bills the problem is we can't right so

24:58

that's why we have to go deeper into

24:59

debt but just raising the debt ceiling

25:02

doesn't mean that we're not going to

25:04

have to deal with these consequences it

25:05

just means we can kick the can down the

25:07

road right while the problem gets worse

25:09

because eventually we're going to hit a

25:11

lending ceiling and that we can't raise

25:14

that's like the lenders are like no Moss

25:16

we're not lending you any more money

25:17

because we're not throwing any more good

25:19

money after bad because you know

25:22

you can't even pass back but what you're

25:24

saying is people would then stop buying

25:26

treasury bonds yeah and in fact we've

25:28

admitted it I mean you know you listen

25:30

to the the Senators and the congressmen

25:33

today talking to Powell if we don't

25:35

raise the debt ceiling we're going to

25:36

default right now

25:38

what if

25:41

what is what are we telling our

25:42

creditors we're telling our creditors

25:44

will only repay or only pay you back if

25:48

we can find some other sucker that'll

25:49

lend us the money sure but the minute we

25:52

can't borrow money from

25:55

somebody else we're not going to pay you

25:57

so that's an admission that it's a giant

25:59

Ponzi scheme right there is the US has

26:02

no ability to pay its debts all it can

26:05

do is find new lenders to lend it the

26:08

money to pay off the old lenders but now

26:11

who's gonna how are they gonna repay the

26:12

new lenders well they got to find

26:14

another group of suckers who will lend

26:16

the money knowing that the only way

26:17

they're going to get it back is if

26:19

there's an even another grade of Greater

26:21

fools well willing to lend so this is

26:23

you know it can't go on Ponzi schemes

26:25

are illegal because they don't work is

26:28

it just because the government runs it

26:29

doesn't mean it's going to work is it

26:30

possible our economy grows such that the

26:33

debt that we have outstanding today is

26:35

nominal relative to economic product no

26:37

that's not possible because the debt is

26:40

growing much faster than GDP

26:42

um the only way they're going to reduce

26:44

the debt is through massive inflation so

26:47

we owe 30 trillion

26:50

or 30 what almost 32 trillion let's say

26:53

and by the end of the decade we'll own

26:56

more than oh more than 50 trillion okay

26:58

well I mean if we had hyperinflation

27:01

yeah and a cup of coffee was a trillion

27:03

dollars well that's no big deal it's

27:05

like 50 cups of coffee and we're good

27:07

yeah you know so obviously you know if

27:10

we don't have hyperplates but even if

27:11

let's say prices go up 10 times let's

27:13

say the government creates enough

27:14

inflation that the dollar loses 90 of

27:17

its value

27:18

between now and the end of the decade

27:20

and so everything costs 10 times you

27:22

think inflation is bad now everything is

27:24

10 times as expensive well now that 50

27:26

trillion dollar debt is like five

27:27

trillion in real in real terms so that's

27:30

how they get out of debt you know if you

27:31

look at you know what we mentioned

27:33

earlier

27:34

inflation benefits debtors and punishes

27:37

creditors who is the biggest debtor in

27:40

the world one thing that States

27:42

government yes and the United that's why

27:44

the United States government is creating

27:46

all this inflation but it doesn't want

27:48

to accept responsibility for the

27:49

inflation because obviously the voters

27:51

don't like it so they try to point

27:52

fingers at Putin or somebody else but

27:55

the government benefits from inflation

27:56

by wiping out its debt but also

27:59

the government benefits from inflation

28:01

in that politicians get to

28:06

um bribe the voters with government

28:08

programs like stimulus yes without

28:11

asking the same voters to pick up the

28:14

tab right see

28:16

when

28:17

they raise taxes

28:20

people don't like that I mean they like

28:21

it if you raise taxes on the rich the

28:24

rich is defined as anybody who has more

28:25

money than you so as long as they raise

28:28

money on people that are are richer than

28:31

you you're fine but nobody wants their

28:33

own taxes raised

28:35

but everybody wants to check from the

28:36

government some form right well how does

28:39

the government pull off that sleight of

28:41

hand how do they give the public

28:42

something without taking something away

28:44

because the government doesn't have any

28:46

money it only has what it takes in in

28:48

taxes and then redistribute so what they

28:50

do is they run deficits they just hand

28:53

out a bunch of money and they don't ask

28:55

anybody to pay taxes where do they get

28:57

the money the FED creates it so it's

28:59

inflation

29:00

inflation is a tax

29:02

so instead of sending your money to the

29:05

government you send your purchasing

29:07

power the government takes your purchase

29:09

power because they don't need to take

29:10

your money they have a pretty press so

29:11

they just print money and they give it

29:13

to somebody and now that person goes and

29:15

buys some stuff but he didn't earn the

29:17

money so he didn't produce anything he

29:18

just has money and now he spends it and

29:21

now prices go up and now you pay higher

29:23

prices instead of higher taxes I mean

29:25

that's why during covet it was so bad

29:27

that think about the how stupid this was

29:29

and I and I I pointed it out on my

29:31

podcast in real time

29:33

in early 2000s

29:36

the US government said nobody go to work

29:37

everybody stay home right don't go to

29:40

work stay at home

29:41

but we don't want you to stop spending

29:42

keep on spending money oh you don't have

29:44

a paycheck anymore we'll send you some

29:46

unemployment benefits right it's 600

29:48

bucks a week we're going to give you

29:49

double or triple what you used to earn

29:51

yeah so we told people not to produce

29:54

but to buy more buy what they weren't

29:57

making anything so that was an

30:00

inflationary Time Bomb because we were

30:02

expanding the money supply to buy prices

30:04

but we were Contracting the supply of

30:06

goods to buy so we had more money and

30:08

fewer goods and prices go through what

30:11

should have happened if the government

30:13

really wanted us to stay home they

30:14

should have said nobody buy anything

30:16

just stay home and stop spending because

30:17

they're not working but that would have

30:19

made it meant to deeper recession so

30:21

they wanted everybody to keep on

30:22

spending you know I mean it shows you

30:24

how little understanding they have and

30:26

even the Federal Reserve uh Powell went

30:29

to Congress and said you guys need to

30:32

spend more money don't worry I'll print

30:33

it we need more stimulus yeah and I got

30:36

you covered yeah I mean so he was

30:38

encouraging the government to create

30:41

more inflation and to be the worst

30:42

possible combination of monetary fiscal

30:44

policy and we're we've barely begun to

30:47

suffer the consequences of that I want

30:50

to hear about this but why I mean do you

30:51

are you suggesting the reason

30:53

potentially we don't use the expansion

30:56

of the money supply in the definition of

30:58

inflation today or in the measures of

31:00

inflation today is because that would be

31:03

too obvious then that you know of course

31:05

well who expands the money supply yeah

31:07

it's only the government right greedy

31:09

businesses can't expand the money supply

31:11

Putin can't expand our money supply yeah

31:13

right so they want to Define it as

31:15

prices but of course when you attack

31:17

prices you're never going to get rid of

31:19

inflation that's why price controls wage

31:21

and price controls that we had in the

31:23

studies they didn't work wow you know

31:25

because it's like you know if you have a

31:27

fever if you break the thermometer

31:28

that's not gonna bring it down right you

31:30

got to get to the cause not you know how

31:34

you measure

31:35

the symptoms so the way we have to fight

31:38

inflation is by shrinking the money

31:40

supply

31:42

but we really have to cut spending yeah

31:44

I mean with austerity like EU yeah when

31:48

when Powell is Raising interest rates I

31:50

think that's going to fight inflation

31:51

see it's not because first of all

31:52

interest rates are a cost

31:55

and just like labor or raw material so

31:57

everybody is dealing with higher

31:59

interest rates and that's all passed

32:00

into prices consumer prices

32:03

what higher interest rates have to do in

32:07

order to bring down inflation is to

32:09

discourage spending and encourage

32:12

savings so if consumers spend less

32:16

then there's less demand and if they

32:19

save more there's more Supply because

32:21

now there's more

32:22

money to to loan out for you know

32:25

capital investment but that's not what's

32:27

happening interest rates have increased

32:30

but they're still below the rate of

32:32

inflation we still have negative real

32:33

interest rates so we're still

32:34

incentivizing Consumer Debt and in fact

32:37

if you look at the consumer credit card

32:40

debt is at a record high savings rates

32:42

at a record low has anybody altered

32:45

their consumption and savings Behavior

32:48

based on the increase in interest rates

32:50

No No in fact to the extent that people

32:53

can't afford to buy something because

32:54

the price went up they don't cut back so

32:56

much they just borrow the money and buy

32:58

it anyway they keep on paying the higher

33:00

prices

33:01

and government is continuing to run

33:03

these deficits we're not going to bring

33:05

down inflation until we bring down the

33:08

deficits we have to reduce government

33:09

spending consumption has to go down all

33:12

government spending is consumption

33:14

so we're running what the Cajuns would

33:16

call an expansionary fiscal policy right

33:19

now we're running huge deficits that is

33:21

inflationary even by the Keynesian you

33:23

know definition so even if you're saying

33:26

we have the FED that is trying to fight

33:28

inflation you have the government that

33:31

is lighting more fires so you know the

33:34

FED is not making any progress so would

33:36

you say you're going to make progress

33:37

just by raising rates at the rate

33:39

they're doing it so at the same time as

33:41

the FED is raising rates the federal

33:44

government is also handing out

33:45

essentially stimulus checks to chip

33:47

companies and manufacturers to produce

33:49

the factories out here battery

33:51

manufacturers I mean we're almost in a

33:53

stimulus war between Europe China and

33:55

the United States for batteries and EV

33:57

would you say then that's stimulative

34:00

while the FED is decided Well it's not

34:02

stimulative in the sense that it helps

34:04

you know it but it stimulates inflation

34:06

if you want sure looking at what it

34:08

stimulates yeah but also you know a lot

34:10

of these politicians

34:11

claim that well you know the inflation

34:13

isn't Biden's fault or the government's

34:16

fault because they have inflation in

34:17

Europe it's also you're going to blame

34:19

the inflation in the Eurozone on Biden

34:22

no I blame it on the European

34:23

politicians who made the same mistakes

34:25

right and more so the European Central

34:28

Bank I mean we have inflation all over

34:31

the world because all these central

34:32

banks made the same mistake they all

34:35

created a bunch of inflation they all

34:37

had zero percent interest rates or

34:39

negative interest rates they were all

34:41

doing quantitative easing it's not an

34:43

accident that now they're experiencing

34:45

uh the consequences that the only thing

34:48

that kind of makes it difficult is that

34:50

there was a big lag was that lag so

34:53

large it took until covet for us to see

34:54

that until after covet right yeah well

34:57

but we're I I don't even think we're

34:58

seeing all the inflation that we created

35:00

in covet I think we're finally catching

35:02

up to the stuff from 2009 2010 I think I

35:05

think there's a lot of inflation in the

35:07

pipeline wow and we're just at the cusp

35:09

of it that's why you think it's actually

35:10

going to be worse today than this 70s

35:12

because what you're saying is the

35:13

inflation we're seeing today is from 09

35:15

yeah inflation hasn't even hit yet and

35:18

and

35:20

um we can't do anything about it because

35:22

if you look at what it took

35:25

so inflation was when volcker came in

35:28

1980 81 as she came in

35:31

inflation was 11 12 10 11 up there right

35:34

and so interest rates went up short-term

35:38

rates went up above 20 percent yeah

35:41

and inflation didn't even get back down

35:44

to two percent for the first time until

35:47

1986. that was six years later and the

35:50

fed's funds rate in 1986 hit a high of

35:53

16 percent six years later you're still

35:56

at 16 just to get inflation to two

35:58

percent and you know how many years it

36:00

took to get another year where inflation

36:02

was two percent or lower well 20 total

36:04

12 and 12. right so Powell thinks he's

36:07

going to get inflation back to two

36:08

percent and keep it there he doesn't

36:09

have a prayer of doing it if it took 20

36:13

interest rates to do it back then we

36:16

have worse inflation now but we have so

36:18

much more debt what would what would the

36:20

interest rate be on the national debt

36:22

even at 10 we have a 35 or 32 trillion

36:26

dollar national debt if we had to pay 10

36:27

on that that's three trillion dollars a

36:29

year that's more than National Defense

36:31

uh Social Security and Medicare probably

36:33

combined I don't know I mean you're

36:35

close I mean it would be it would be

36:37

like two-thirds of the government's tax

36:39

revenue

36:40

yeah even even when they refinance the

36:42

whole thing at five percent

36:44

you know you're you're we're going to be

36:46

spending in a couple years it's going to

36:47

be two trillion a year in interest maybe

36:49

half the tax revenue and we're already

36:51

at a one trillion we're not quite a

36:53

trillion years by the end of this year

36:54

early next year it'll be a trillion

36:57

dollars a year just in interest on the

37:01

national debt that means over 10 years

37:03

that's 10 trillion in interest payments

37:05

but of course it will be more than that

37:07

because rates are going to keep going up

37:09

and the debt keeps going up so it's it

37:11

compounds so what do you say to people

37:12

who say that uh one of the reasons you

37:15

had more inflation in the 70s and you

37:17

ended up getting a Paul volcker was

37:18

because of unanchored inflation

37:19

expectations whereas today they're

37:21

relatively anchored yeah well I mean I

37:24

think that's a bunch of BS when you know

37:26

and pal said that again today that he

37:28

thinks that inflation is a function of

37:30

expectations like you know people expect

37:32

inflation and that's why there is

37:34

inflation but that's part of the

37:36

government's efforts to blame other

37:37

people for inflation we don't have

37:39

inflation because people expect it

37:42

people expect inflation because we have

37:44

it right so they got the cart before the

37:46

horse interesting and it's not that my

37:49

beliefs about inflation

37:51

is what creates it is well if you think

37:55

there's going to be rising prices you're

37:56

going to demand higher wages and you

37:59

know but this is all a bunch of BS you

38:02

know but yes of course if you have

38:04

inflation long enough

38:06

people will anticipate that it will

38:09

continue and they will try to deal with

38:12

it as best they can but that is not

38:14

what's creating it and it's possible

38:17

that if people anticipate inflation but

38:20

you pursue the correct policies they'll

38:22

end up being wrong there won't be the

38:24

inflation that they anticipate and in

38:26

fact I think Americans by and large are

38:29

wrong today there's going to be far more

38:31

inflation than just about anybody

38:33

anticipates wow I mean think about the

38:35

huge inflation that we had

38:37

I mean it measured by CPI last year

38:40

eight nine percent how many people

38:42

anticipated that yeah no it wasn't you

38:44

know people thought oh everybody thought

38:45

that inflation would be low

38:47

uh and people still expect it to be low

38:49

I mean if you look at what they expect

38:51

not two percent but maybe three percent

38:53

sure but they're they're completely

38:54

wrong so five years out the University

38:57

of Michigan say says 4.2 percent for

39:00

inflation uh sorry that might be one

39:02

year out one year out four point two

39:04

percent let's say and five years out 2.4

39:06

what say you do that completely off well

39:10

I don't even know like how they ask the

39:13

question I mean I've never been

39:14

questioned but I mean a lot of Americans

39:16

can't even do basic math I mean you ever

39:18

see some of these videos I mean I mean

39:20

the Americans have been so dumbed down

39:22

on just about any subject how are you

39:24

going to ask like oh what's the

39:25

inflation rate going to be in four years

39:27

like how the hell does anybody know so I

39:29

mean do they give them like a multiple

39:30

choice I mean I don't even know like

39:34

how they they they conduct the polls

39:37

yeah you know I've never received a

39:38

phone call from somebody from the

39:40

government asking me what I thought the

39:41

inflation rate was going to be you know

39:43

three or four years from now I mean so

39:45

the whole thing is ridiculous to even

39:46

put any stock into what a bunch of

39:49

idiots think inflation is going to be

39:50

right I mean you know they don't know I

39:53

mean they actually they may be they may

39:55

be closer than a central Banker yeah you

39:57

know they actually may be more accurate

39:59

than the people on the fomc but they

40:02

don't know they're just guessing how the

40:03

hell how does anybody know what it's

40:05

going to be now what's uh what would you

40:07

say though to this great moderation that

40:09

we've had over the last 40 Years of yes

40:12

expanding the debt uh so expanding the

40:14

money supply but uh also inflation

40:16

falling from the Paul volcker era down

40:19

to really 20 right before well again

40:21

part of that is due to the changes we

40:23

made to the CPI so that we're not being

40:26

honest so inflation has been so we've

40:29

been misled we've misled okay but I

40:31

think

40:32

you have other factors that have come

40:34

like one of them in the U.S was women

40:37

entering the labor force I think that

40:39

was a big thing because prior to the

40:42

1970s married women by and large did not

40:45

work sure I mean maybe if their husband

40:47

got laid off they might get a job just

40:49

to pick up the slack till he got another

40:50

job

40:52

but I mean women didn't work

40:55

but as a result of the inflation of the

40:57

70s

40:59

and the reduction in the real income of

41:01

the men the women came to the rescue the

41:04

women

41:05

went to work and so we got the benefit

41:08

of all that extra labor we didn't have

41:11

it before right instead of productivity

41:13

so yes now we have more people working

41:16

uh and producing and so instead of the

41:19

husband having to support the wife he

41:21

didn't have they supported each other

41:22

and so you had you had another worker so

41:25

that was part of it now of course we

41:27

can't do that anymore because they're

41:28

both working and now that some of them

41:30

are they're working two or three jobs a

41:31

piece they're kind of maxed out I mean I

41:33

suppose the kids can start dropping out

41:35

of school and they could pitch in oh

41:36

okay but you know yes they got those

41:38

child labor laws yeah yeah it's hard but

41:41

um so the other thing I think was the

41:43

growth of China I think China really

41:45

saved us because you had all these

41:47

people that could do all the work for us

41:50

at a lower cost deflationary

41:52

and and so we were able to uh Outsource

41:56

a lot of our production

41:58

and that kept the lid on prices because

42:01

all this stuff was coming in from China

42:03

uh at prices that we could never produce

42:05

it ourselves I mean obviously if all the

42:08

money we printed had to stay in America

42:10

and we can only buy what we made I mean

42:12

prices would have just gone through the

42:14

roof but we were able to send the money

42:16

to China and and they sent us their

42:18

stuff now what did China do with the

42:21

money they bought treasuries they bought

42:22

stocks they bought real estate so what

42:25

happens during the 90s and the 2000s

42:29

2010s is a lot of that inflation

42:32

ended up in financial assets that's why

42:35

stock prices went up so much that's why

42:37

real estate prices that's why bond

42:38

prices right so inflation was showing up

42:41

in those financial assets because that's

42:43

how the money was making its way through

42:45

the economy but where we are now we're

42:48

at the early stages of the money flowing

42:51

out of financial assets into consumer

42:54

goods and because that's ultimately

42:56

where it all goes

42:57

because nobody buys stocks because they

43:01

want stocks I mean there's probably some

43:03

Geeks out there that just love stocks

43:05

they're just trading for the thrill of

43:07

it you know but most people want to buy

43:10

stocks because they want to sell the

43:12

stock and buy something with the money

43:14

that they earn and appreciation

43:17

guys like me

43:19

I buy stocks for the dividends right

43:21

right I expect I want to earn dividends

43:22

and I want to spend the dividends on on

43:24

things whatever you want right but no

43:27

one just wants the stock just to brag

43:29

about owning it or admire the

43:31

certificate assuming they actually know

43:32

what really has a certificate

43:35

so ultimately everybody's goal is to

43:38

move the money out of the stock market

43:39

into the real economy and buy cars take

43:42

vacations buy a house travel go out to

43:45

dinner buy clothes that's what everybody

43:47

wants right so as all the people start

43:51

to turn their financial assets into

43:53

consumption prices for financial assets

43:56

are going down because people have to

43:57

sell

43:58

and now the price of everything else is

44:00

going up because people are starting to

44:02

spend so we're just early in that cycle

44:05

yikes now what's your take on

44:07

potentially deglobalization also then

44:09

increasing those prices or do you think

44:11

the world will more re-globalize

44:14

no you're right I mean I think we've

44:16

reached the end of that trade with China

44:18

where China's like screw this yeah you

44:20

know we want our stuff we're going to

44:24

keep the stuff that we make you keep the

44:26

money you print we'll keep all this

44:28

stuff

44:29

and and so we're not going to be able to

44:31

import deflation from China we're going

44:34

to be importing our inflation back right

44:37

because all that money comes back

44:38

because you know what the Chinese are

44:39

going to do they're going to take their

44:41

money and buy our used stuff

44:42

right not you buy our used cars or you

44:45

know whatever so a lot of prices are

44:47

going to be bid up when they don't want

44:49

our stocks anymore they don't want our

44:50

bonds anymore they want actual stuff uh

44:53

so you know we have this big Day of

44:55

Reckoning coming with inflation and a

44:57

dollar devaluation I mean there's just

44:58

no way around it what's that going to

45:01

look like

45:02

going to look pretty bad right because

45:03

you know it's prices are just going to

45:05

go way up and prices of goods and then

45:07

assets down yeah no asset prices might

45:10

actually go up in nominal terms but

45:12

don't go down in real terms right

45:14

compared to so you expect hyperinflation

45:16

well that be the worst case scenario I

45:19

hope we avoid that but even if it's not

45:21

hyperinflation you know why my Republic

45:22

style or Zimbabwe style something like

45:25

that we can still have you know an

45:27

Argentina type situation you know Turkey

45:30

yeah we could have something now it

45:34

doesn't mean that we're that Weimar

45:36

Republic is impossible of course because

45:38

you know Germany was very wealthy I mean

45:40

you know

45:41

uh and look what happened right I mean

45:43

so it's possible that we could we could

45:46

end up in a worst case scenario but to

45:48

avoid the worst case scenario it's you

45:50

know we're gonna have to bite the bullet

45:51

at some point otherwise that's what's

45:53

going to happen and what time frame do

45:55

you see that in I think once once the

45:57

inflation really kicks in it'll be quick

45:58

you know the dollar will start spiraling

46:01

down and prices will go up and the real

46:04

you know problem is going to be you know

46:07

the the politics of it all the civil

46:09

unrest that may uh ensue

46:13

and other really

46:15

misguided policies we may go back to

46:17

wage of price controls again import

46:19

restrictions exchange rate restrictions

46:22

so that just makes it worse yeah of

46:24

course

46:25

because it will create shortages right

46:27

and then black markets underground

46:29

economy

46:31

um a lot of crime violence I mean it's

46:33

yeah I mean it it it's not going to be

46:36

pretty that's that's and you think that

46:37

could be with as soon as potentially the

46:39

next few years when the real inflation

46:40

comes through yeah I mean it can happen

46:42

anytime I mean again we can kick the can

46:45

down the road for another five years I

46:47

don't know so you know we can still go

46:48

to the moon for another five years

46:50

oh you know prices yeah I doubt if you

46:53

look at the charts

46:55

I doubt that we're gonna you know see

46:58

another huge run

47:00

you know in a lot of these Tech names

47:02

and things like that I mean I wouldn't

47:03

be surprised if the Dow made a new high

47:05

man that could happen because you have

47:07

some legitimate companies that are in

47:09

those 30 thousand stocks yeah like AMC

47:11

yeah well they would have been too bad

47:14

they kicked out Exxon Mobil you know

47:16

they replaced it with Salesforce yeah

47:18

but um but yeah I don't think you're

47:21

gonna see you know you know the fangs or

47:23

the low even lower quality names I don't

47:25

think they're made I think the highs are

47:27

in for those stocks wow even nominally

47:29

you know I wouldn't be surprised if they

47:31

they made new Highs but if they do it's

47:33

only with massive inflation and in which

47:36

case they made a new high but you're

47:37

better off with owning almost almost

47:39

anything else oh my gosh anything other

47:41

than stocks those stocks well you can

47:43

own the right stocks

47:45

um but just you know you know the the

47:47

stuff in your kitchen can outperform

47:49

those stocks right what's prevented you

47:51

from launching your own ETF like a Kathy

47:53

would uh but maybe more dividend focused

47:55

well I have my own mutual funds I've

47:57

already done that I have a whole family

47:59

of funds

48:03

and finally after several years of

48:06

lagging the competition I'm now at the

48:09

top of the Heap

48:10

um it's dividend payer fund yeah uh was

48:14

number one last year according to uh

48:17

lipber uh Morningstar uh U.S news and

48:21

World we've got a couple of awards for

48:23

the fund in fact congrats in

48:25

international value there's like 350

48:28

funds in a category I only have two

48:30

funds in the category and my funds are

48:32

ranked one in three wow over the last

48:34

one year three years and five years okay

48:35

so uh and that's a value strategy uh you

48:40

know good stock picking good sector

48:42

collection now the absolute returns are

48:44

not great in dollars because we've had a

48:46

very strong dollar so the returns are

48:48

only good relative to my peers and

48:50

that's of course the Benchmark right how

48:52

I've done but I think the returns over

48:54

the next five years are going to be much

48:56

better

48:57

not only in relative terms but in

49:00

absolute terms because I expect the

49:02

dollar would be very weak over the next

49:04

five years now I expected it to be weak

49:06

over the past five years so I got that

49:07

wrong right I expected my funds to

49:10

deliver better returns for my American

49:13

uh investors sure

49:16

um but I think we're going to make up

49:17

for that because I think the next five

49:19

years will give us enough extra return

49:23

to make up for the first five because I

49:25

think now the dollars demise is going to

49:28

be bigger it's a bigger bubble more air

49:30

is going to come out so I think we're

49:31

going to get paid the Payday for being

49:34

patient is going to be bigger because we

49:37

had to wait longer to to receive it now

49:40

if we have more inflation wouldn't that

49:43

lead treasury yields then to increase

49:44

and potentially demand for those

49:45

treasuries to increase leading the

49:47

dollar to rise at least in the short

49:49

terms well that's already happened right

49:51

yields have picked up and the Dollar's

49:54

gone up right

49:56

but that's only because the markets

49:58

still believe the FED is going to

49:59

succeed in reducing inflation over the

50:02

long run right it'll take a failure in

50:03

other words I see

50:05

the markets have to lose confidence in

50:07

the FED for some reason they still do if

50:09

you look at a 30-year treasury right the

50:11

yield is less than four percent in fact

50:13

the yield on the 10-year treasure is

50:14

higher than the yield on the 30-year

50:16

treasury they yield out a five-year

50:17

treasury is higher than on a 10 year the

50:19

yield about a two years higher than five

50:20

years everybody expects the FED to

50:22

succeed

50:23

yeah they're not going to succeed

50:25

they're going to fail so you think the

50:27

Bond Market is wrong completely wrong

50:29

right

50:30

and and part of the reason they're wrong

50:31

is it's so distorted by the central

50:34

banks but at some point

50:36

the Bond vigilantes are going to wake up

50:39

and realize that the central banks have

50:42

put themselves in a box and there's no

50:44

escape and that inflation is not going

50:46

away it's here to stay

50:48

and even though they're raising interest

50:50

rates the rate that you're getting is

50:52

still going to be negative in terms of

50:54

inflation I don't believe the central

50:56

banks are able to offer an interest rate

51:00

that is above the inflation rate wow and

51:03

so as long as bonds are yielding

51:05

negative why would anybody want one you

51:09

can't win in a bond you you know you

51:12

could make money in stocks when interest

51:13

rates are negative I mean you know you

51:15

could have a lot of growth the stock

51:16

price go up but if inflation is eight

51:19

percent and you've got a bond with a

51:21

five percent coupon you can't make money

51:23

you're guaranteed to lose unless the

51:25

inflation rate comes way down right but

51:27

it's not going to happen you know so now

51:30

do you think it's possible if they've

51:32

rigged the inflation data for let's say

51:34

the past decade that they could adjust

51:37

the inflation data down going forward

51:39

they probably will but you know I mean

51:42

you know you can't fool everybody you

51:44

know it's like you know

51:46

some of the ways that companies avoid

51:48

raising prices as they just you know

51:50

translation not yeah so I mean

51:53

eventually you buy a box of cereal and

51:55

there's just like one flake in there I

51:57

mean you can't you know I remember when

51:58

I used to buy cereal when I was a kid

51:59

right into box it was filled up to the

52:02

top right and I know that because when I

52:04

used to go to the supermarket with my my

52:07

mom

52:08

we would pick the cereal based on the

52:10

toy inside and so as soon as I got home

52:12

I would have my mother open up the box

52:15

and pour out the cereal so I could get

52:17

the toy and that cereal was all the way

52:19

to the top of the box now you buy a box

52:22

of cereal and it doesn't even start

52:23

until two thirds down like two-thirds of

52:26

the box is actually empty sure by the

52:28

time you get to the little bit of cereal

52:29

it's in that box so I mean just but

52:32

there's only so much they could do and

52:34

they you know and then they're reluctant

52:35

to shrink the size of it because you

52:37

know then you'll see so they just they

52:39

just give you lessons the same box but

52:41

at some point you reach you know you

52:43

can't shrink it anymore I mean they keep

52:45

taking sheets out of a roll of toilet

52:47

paper yeah you know at some point they

52:49

you know they can't make them that small

52:51

and they have to just you know start

52:52

raising prices but it's still the same

52:54

to the consumer because I just have to

52:55

go and buy more rolls doesn't matter if

52:58

they just you know make the rolls

53:00

smaller and I pay less per roll I have

53:02

to go every time I go to the supermarket

53:04

you know you got to buy you know a 12

53:05

pack yeah you know to get enough toilet

53:08

paper last of the week especially you

53:10

know if you you know if you've got women

53:11

in the house you know they they run

53:12

through that toilet paper what about uh

53:15

Kathy Wood uh and her idea that

53:19

inflation today is actually lower than

53:22

what's being reported yeah the opposite

53:24

of what's actually true that's how the

53:25

lyric delusional Kathy Wood is yeah I

53:28

mean look she's just saying that because

53:31

she's trying to talk her own book and

53:33

you know you can make the same

53:34

accusation you know of me right Peter's

53:36

just bearish because he's you know long

53:38

gold stocks or he's short to Dollar you

53:40

know so yes I recognize that you you

53:43

could say that but

53:44

in this you know I

53:46

I think I'm right of course obviously

53:48

maybe she thinks she's right too but

53:50

uh why do you think she's wrong

53:52

well she's pretty much been wrong about

53:54

everything but

53:58

what she's talking about right

54:01

higher productivity and I don't

54:04

dispute the facts

54:06

that in certain areas

54:09

productivity is going on AI yeah and and

54:13

now it remains to be seen right

54:16

what that AI is going to ultimately do

54:21

for productivity it has the potential

54:24

to make people a lot more productive

54:26

because I can start a business and

54:30

instead of hiring a bunch of people

54:32

I can just have a computer program do it

54:35

for me and I don't have to use those

54:37

labor resources they're freed up to do

54:39

something else

54:40

and you know to the extent that I can

54:42

run a business on a lower budget well

54:44

then I can charge lower prices for

54:46

whatever my goods or services are

54:48

because I don't have to pay all these

54:50

workers

54:52

um and so it's very possible that

54:54

productivity goes up which is good we

54:57

want productivity to go up and under the

55:00

normal course

55:01

that would mean lower prices but if we

55:04

print enough money that we will lose

55:05

that benefit prices May remain the same

55:08

or they may go up a little bit so we

55:10

still have inflation even if the free

55:12

market is increasing productivity The

55:15

Government Can Be undermining the

55:17

benefits of that by creating inflation

55:19

so thanks to running a deficit because

55:21

by default you're suggesting we're

55:23

running a deficit which is inflationary

55:25

and so even if we get uh Innovation

55:28

we're we're still fighting the situation

55:30

what's probably going to happen in the

55:32

world that we live in today versus the

55:34

free market world that we should be

55:35

living in is a lot of the workers that

55:38

end up losing their jobs to AI we'll

55:40

just go on some government welfare

55:41

program so it's not like they're going

55:43

to go do something else Ubi yeah they're

55:45

just going to get money from the

55:46

government so it's like that's going to

55:48

offset that's interesting so that's

55:50

potentially arguing that even if if we

55:52

get more productivity we might just take

55:54

one person completely out of the

55:55

workforce and then reset that

55:57

productivity back to right where it was

55:58

well if if if the government simply pays

56:02

the person so let's say let's say

56:03

somebody was employed right making you

56:06

know fifty thousand dollars a year yeah

56:08

and then I lay that guy off I don't need

56:10

them anymore I can I a computer can do

56:12

his job for me so I I don't have to

56:14

expense that 50 000. and now I fire that

56:17

guy if that guy goes and gets another

56:19

job it's a win yeah right because now

56:22

he's doing something else so now we have

56:24

the benefit of whatever else he's doing

56:25

sure plus what I'm doing with the

56:27

computer but if instead he goes to the

56:29

government the government just gives

56:30

them fifty thousand dollars a year and

56:31

some kind of welfare and he doesn't work

56:33

then Society hasn't benefited at all

56:35

from there's no extra product too the

56:37

guys just get money from the government

56:39

and so you know whatever whatever uh

56:42

benefits are being stolen by the

56:43

government so we'll see how this is

56:45

going to happen I mean obviously some of

56:47

the first people to lose their jobs

56:49

from a lot of this are going to be the

56:50

unskilled like the minimum wage type

56:52

workers who are being you know automated

56:54

out of existence by the minimum wage and

56:56

other payroll taxes and a lot of these

56:58

guys obviously are just showing up

57:01

um on the welfare rules I mean look at

57:04

the the labor force participation rate I

57:06

mean why is it so low where are all

57:07

those people how these people surviving

57:09

could it have been retirements because

57:11

of covid

57:12

well some people but

57:14

um

57:15

you know a lot of it are just young

57:17

people that never even enter the

57:18

workforce but I think a lot of people

57:20

are actually coming out of retirement

57:22

somehow because they can't even afford

57:23

to stay retired because they're the

57:25

inflation they're taking these odd jobs

57:27

and things like that but I think a lot

57:30

more people over the course of this

57:31

decade who are now retired are going to

57:33

go back to work what's your take on

57:36

housing then housing is obviously a real

57:38

asset uh potentially an inflationary

57:40

hedge uh however with rates going from

57:44

2.7 to now 6.7 maybe in some cases seven

57:47

percent it seems like there could be an

57:49

impetus of a housing crash uh much like

57:52

you potentially I believe you predicted

57:54

in 2005 uh or 2006 you mentioned you saw

57:57

the top of the housing market at the end

57:59

of o5 and that there would be some form

58:01

of housing crash how does that relate to

58:03

what you're seeing today well I started

58:05

a warning about the housing bubble when

58:06

the FED began inflating it in 2002. oh

58:09

wow I just didn't know when it would

58:10

reach its peak but by

58:13

2005-2006 it was pretty clear that we

58:15

had peaked and I was you know warning

58:17

about it and that's when we I helped get

58:19

the hedge fund the shorts subprime and

58:21

do all that stuff uh and that was in 06

58:23

and that was you know pretty much just

58:25

before it all imploded in 07 right but I

58:28

I had been warning about it you know and

58:30

writing about it extensively online in

58:33

2003 2000 2004 2005. so this thing

58:36

didn't come out of left field and I

58:39

explained exactly why we had a bubble I

58:41

talked about how the Federal Reserve how

58:43

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the banks

58:45

the appraisal industry and I explained

58:48

how all that was happening and and how

58:51

was the story in the economy and the

58:52

financial crisis that was going to

58:54

result when the whole thing burst so I

58:56

mean

58:57

people have said if they you know listen

58:58

to some of my talks you would think that

59:00

I was I came back from the future

59:02

and well you know in the time these

59:05

talks but it's basic economics it's just

59:07

that so many people don't understand it

59:09

sure you know they think that I'm some

59:11

kind of prophet because I can see what

59:12

should have been obvious to everyone

59:13

else when the schools aren't teaching

59:15

that it wasn't that I was so smart is

59:16

that everybody else was so dumb and so

59:19

you know I was the the tallest uh well

59:22

short short person little person in the

59:25

room I don't want to don't want to be

59:26

politically incorrect but um so how does

59:29

that compare to today well it look it is

59:31

a different situation today

59:33

we don't have time is different we well

59:35

I mean we don't have the same type of

59:37

subprime

59:38

uh Market that we had back then right we

59:41

don't have as many teaser rates and

59:42

adjustable rate mortgages now as we have

59:44

back then but it's still a big bubble

59:45

right uh real estate is still priced

59:48

really for three percent mortgages three

59:50

three percent mortgages and we're at

59:51

seven and going higher going higher

59:53

where's the terminal they're both fed

59:55

and what would you guess two years from

59:57

now I don't know it's gonna go higher I

60:00

don't know I can't I don't know I just

60:01

think it's you know in the 1980s

60:04

mortgage rates were 14 15 you know I

60:07

mean they can't get up there again you

60:09

could force you could reasonably foresee

60:11

14 mortgages sure it could happen now

60:14

the FED might cry Uncle before then but

60:16

we'll see

60:17

but um

60:19

mortgage mortgage rates

60:21

are double what they were right at the

60:23

lows oh yeah and and so homes for most

60:27

people are completely unaffordable

60:28

unless the price comes down and so

60:30

that's the only thing that can give us

60:32

the price so the price will eventually

60:34

come down for houses

60:36

um and then that sets off a whole other

60:38

bunch of problems when people have

60:39

negative equity right and you know do

60:42

they make their mortgage payments you

60:43

know uh you know so you get the defaults

60:46

one thing that might keep people in

60:48

their homes today longer than in 2008 is

60:51

people had a decade to refinance their

60:53

mortgages at three three and a half

60:55

percent

60:56

and so even if your house loses value

60:59

there's still an incentive to stay there

61:01

because your mortgage could be lower

61:03

than what you could rent right what you

61:05

can get a rental for

61:07

and even if you sell your home you can't

61:10

buy another one because you can't get

61:11

that cheap money anymore right so people

61:13

do have an incentive to stay in a home

61:15

even if it's worth less than they paid

61:17

because the mortgage is worth way more

61:20

right that that's your that's most

61:22

homeowners most valuable asset right now

61:24

it's the mortgage they've borrowed all

61:27

this money for 30 years and they've got

61:29

a really low rate right inflation is

61:32

going to average you know let's say

61:33

seven or eight percent or more ten

61:35

percent for the next 30 Years and you've

61:37

got a three and a half percent mortgage

61:38

you know that's huge that's worth the

61:41

bank should pay you lots of money to

61:43

sell to give up to walk away you know to

61:46

pay to pay the mortgage off sell your

61:48

house and pay so that's going to keep

61:50

more people in their homes if you didn't

61:52

have that situation

61:54

um back then yeah

61:56

yeah

61:56

um

61:57

but you know the problem for homeowners

62:00

though is the maintenance costs are

62:01

going to go up the insurance costs and I

62:03

I some at my home in Connecticut

62:04

the uh property insurance doubles wow

62:08

because they said well it costs twice as

62:10

much to your house isn't worth more but

62:11

if it burns down it's twice as expensive

62:13

to rebuild it the materials the labor

62:15

right so uh those costs property tax is

62:20

going up because all these governments

62:22

that have a lot of debt now the interest

62:24

rates are going up where are they going

62:25

to get the money they got to raise taxes

62:27

so homeowners are going to be under a

62:29

lot of pressure even if their mortgage

62:30

is fixed you know a lot of their other

62:33

expenses are not but I real estate

62:35

prices are going to come down in in real

62:37

terms they're going to come way down

62:39

nominal terms it all depends on how much

62:42

more inflation

62:43

is Unleashed how quickly the FED folds

62:46

and pivots and you think they will they

62:49

will eventually because they've done it

62:51

every time in the past you know the last

62:54

time was coveted right they were they

62:55

were trying to normalize interest rates

62:57

before coven

62:59

and remember when they initially cut

63:00

interest rates the first time in like

63:03

2020 when it was

63:04

or 29 yeah 2020 or no it was 2018. they

63:08

started cutting rates

63:09

they had to abort it the minute like the

63:11

market started to fall apart they like

63:13

you know they stopped they said oh it's

63:14

a mid-course correction and of course it

63:16

ended up being you know it went to zero

63:18

then it wasn't a correction there was a

63:19

beginning of going back to zero sure

63:22

um so they will reach that point again

63:25

but there just has to be more pain

63:27

before they they do that wouldn't that

63:29

though if if the FED does that uh and

63:32

rates came down wouldn't that

63:33

potentially signal an opportunity for

63:35

all right back to borrowing stocks back

63:37

up I don't well the reason I don't think

63:39

it's gonna be like the third time's the

63:42

charm for the FED I mean they got away

63:43

with it in 2008 they got away with it in

63:47

2020.

63:49

I don't think they're gonna get away

63:51

with it again

63:52

because

63:55

during the you know 2009 time period

63:59

2010 2011 and even as late as 2020. the

64:04

official CPI numbers were still sub two

64:06

percent so they had that cover like okay

64:09

we can do this because we have low

64:10

inflation right but

64:13

if the wheels fall off the bus again we

64:16

have a blow up in the financial sector

64:18

or whether it's a bank failure or

64:20

something's going on with the money

64:22

markets or hedge funder some some

64:24

something cracks somewhere because

64:25

there's all this debt out there right

64:27

and it's all it's unserviceable let

64:29

alone unpayable so Something's Gonna

64:31

Break something's going to implode

64:34

the longer the FED keeps rates where

64:36

they are and of course as they keep

64:38

ratcheting it up it just puts more

64:39

pressure

64:41

so but when something happens some

64:45

crisis happens and now the Fed

64:48

does what it's done in the pants right

64:50

oh we're going to slash interest rates

64:51

we're going to launch QE if they do that

64:54

let's say inflation is six percent it's

64:57

tripled or two percent Target

64:59

how can they justify

65:01

their response

65:03

and if inflation is six percent and they

65:07

pursue inflation as a solution to this

65:10

financial problem and now it goes to 15

65:13

right does the bond market really rally

65:16

in that circumstance because the bond

65:19

market has rallied every time the FED

65:21

has launched QE right because Traders

65:25

anticipate the FED buying bonds and so

65:28

they want to own those bonds and sell

65:29

them to the FED but if they realize that

65:32

inflation is running out of control

65:35

bonds are just IOU dollars and if the

65:38

dollar is going to lose a lot of value

65:40

why would you want to buy a promise to

65:43

be paid dollars in the future when

65:45

they're going to be worth so much less

65:46

in the future they are right now so

65:47

that's going to be the real breaking

65:49

point where the FED goes back to QE and

65:52

instead of going up bond prices go down

65:55

because the trust has been lost and and

65:57

they no longer believe that inflation is

65:59

contained wow and also the dollar goes

66:02

down see right now the FED raises rates

66:05

the dollar goes up bonds go up what's

66:07

ultimately going to happen is the fed's

66:09

going to raise rates and the dollar and

66:10

the bonds are going to go down wow

66:12

because people are going to realize that

66:14

they're raising rates but it doesn't

66:15

matter they're still behind the

66:17

inflation curve and it doesn't matter if

66:19

nominal rates go up what matters is real

66:21

rates and if inflation is is is

66:24

accelerating faster than the rate hikes

66:26

the FED is is falling further behind the

66:28

curve so at some point right they're

66:30

going to wake up and then gold will

66:32

respond I mean right now what happens

66:33

with gold whenever there's more in

66:35

isolation than the markets expect gold

66:37

goes down right oh inflation is hotter

66:40

and gold you know gold was down 30 bucks

66:42

the other day

66:43

I know there's inflation News why is

66:47

why is higher inflation bad for gold

66:49

Gold's an inflation hedge right it

66:51

should be good for both it's only bad

66:52

for gold because the markets think the

66:54

FED will be motivated to fight harder oh

66:56

inflation is higher than a Fed thought

66:58

well they're just going to have to raise

67:00

rates higher and leave them there even

67:02

longer to bring it back down and so that

67:04

pushes gold down what investors

67:07

eventually have to come to terms with is

67:09

higher inflation doesn't mean the FED

67:11

has to fight harder to win it just means

67:14

the FED is losing it is losing the war

67:16

against inflation and higher inflation

67:19

is evidence of that

67:22

and you need to buy gold on higher

67:24

inflation So eventually that's what's

67:26

going to happen when we have higher

67:27

inflation when we have more stimulus we

67:29

have more QE it's going to be gold

67:32

up the dollar down bonds down

67:35

and stocks you know it'll be mixed

67:38

depending on the stock based on the

67:39

earnings or whatever yeah I mean some

67:41

companies but initially I mean you know

67:43

a lot of things are going to can include

67:44

I mean to me the Market's you know

67:47

really look like

67:48

2001 around then I mean wow so your

67:52

favorite stocks then if we're in 01

67:53

would be uh All Tech today no yes well

67:56

those are the ones that are going to go

67:57

down the most remember the NASDAQ

67:59

dropped about 80 percent and a lot of

68:01

stocks dropped 100 and the NASDAQ would

68:04

have gone down more than 80 percent in

68:06

fact I think it would have gone down 90

68:08

in fact back in 2000 when the bubble was

68:10

near its peak the NASA was now five

68:12

thousand I was predicting a 90 Decline

68:15

and the only reason it was only 80 was

68:19

because the FED cut rates to one percent

68:21

I didn't see that happening Darth Peter

68:23

you were lost yeah so but by 2002 I said

68:27

okay we're not going down 90 I could see

68:29

the writing I could read the writing on

68:30

the wall with one percent interest rates

68:32

and so I knew that you know the market

68:33

had bought them but I still didn't buy

68:35

the tech stocks I was just buying you

68:37

know value stocks and foreign stocks now

68:39

I should have I should have you know

68:40

loaded up should have just bought a

68:41

bunch of Amazon back then uh you know

68:44

that that one survived Amazon Apple you

68:47

know eBay Apple was a great buy back

68:49

then yeah sure because you know that

68:51

Apple was Apple was the stock that

68:53

didn't even participate in the bubble

68:54

everybody everybody was selling their

68:56

Apple to buy all the apple apple was

68:59

nothing you know in 2000 it was you know

69:01

so what you're saying is today all in on

69:03

Tesla then

69:05

Yeah well yeah Tesla is one of those uh

69:07

you know Meme stocks and maybe it's the

69:09

original meme stock wow

69:11

but I still think Tesla has a way to go

69:13

down and on all these stocks and that's

69:15

again that's Kathy Woods like her core

69:16

holding is a Tesla and that's what kind

69:19

of helped Propel her to into the

69:21

Limelight she got lucky with Tesla she

69:23

bought a bunch of Tesla

69:25

do you think she can get lucky again

69:26

with the autonomy of full self-driving

69:29

or no no I mean I think I mean I think

69:32

her her

69:34

stay in the Limelight you know her five

69:36

minutes served forever made how much

69:38

Fame she had although you know she still

69:41

gets brought out they still look at her

69:43

as some kind of Messiah they don't

69:44

realize that

69:46

she was just in the right place at the

69:48

right time

69:49

and there's an old saying about not

69:51

confusing brains with a bull market and

69:54

that's particularly important in a

69:55

bubble you definitely don't want to

69:57

confuse brains with a bubble because she

70:00

was in a bubble and she's still in a

70:02

bubble she just doesn't recognize it's

70:05

very hard to see a bubble when you're

70:07

inside it right it's much easier when

70:09

you're looking from outside the bubble

70:11

so with her arguments on uh robotics

70:14

battery storage autonomy genomic

70:18

sequencing those none of those are

70:20

interesting or just too expensive all

70:23

that stuff is good I'm not saying that

70:25

she's wrong that there's going to be

70:27

Innovation now

70:29

is she smart enough to pick the names

70:31

that are going to make it probably not I

70:34

mean most of the stock she's buying

70:36

probably you know are gonna go bankrupt

70:39

I mean she doesn't it's very difficult

70:40

to do like if you go back to the

70:42

beginning of the automobile I mean

70:43

there's like 100 automobile companies in

70:45

America so if you would have bought a

70:47

bunch of these companies in 1900 because

70:49

yeah people are going to use cars

70:51

they're not going to be riding on on

70:53

horses anymore you might have been right

70:55

but most of the stocks you bought would

70:57

have gone to zero wow right because you

70:59

know you don't know so

71:02

Kathy Wood is probably right that we're

71:05

gonna have a lot of increased

71:07

productivity that's going to result from

71:09

you know Tech and artificial

71:11

intelligence and all the stuff that

71:12

we're doing

71:13

but are the companies that she owns now

71:16

going to really benefit from it or are

71:20

they going to be put out of business by

71:21

another company that she doesn't own you

71:24

know that that just comes out of left

71:27

field with something better

71:28

uh maybe the the the companies that

71:31

choose invested are just laying the

71:32

foundation for other companies to

71:35

rebuild on the rubble that they leave

71:37

behind who knows now maybe some of the

71:40

stocks that she owns will end up

71:42

succeeding but the question is

71:44

what will they be worth maybe she

71:45

already overpaid for them maybe they

71:48

will succeed but they're not going to be

71:49

as valuable as she thinks because

71:52

they're going to have a lot more

71:52

competition

71:54

see that's what happens like with Tesla

71:56

people are like oh look at this electric

71:58

car market and look at Tesla has half

72:00

the market so and and when and when

72:02

everybody has an electric car they're

72:04

going to have half of that market no

72:05

they won't because as they start making

72:08

money they're going to invite

72:09

competition and so you may be right that

72:12

everybody is in electric cars but the

72:16

market share of Tesla is going to be a

72:18

fraction

72:19

of what it is

72:21

in the future when it's a much bigger

72:23

market and they're competing with all

72:25

these other companies I mean you pointed

72:27

out you came into my garage I got two

72:28

electric vehicles and neither one is

72:30

Tesla one is a Jaguar one is a Porsche I

72:33

mean you know

72:34

so I mean there's other companies that

72:36

make electric vehicles you don't have to

72:38

buy Tesla but do you have full

72:40

self-driving no but you know I don't I

72:43

don't have self-driving but I wouldn't

72:45

how valuable do you think there's too

72:46

many potholes in Puerto Rico I don't do

72:48

they self-driving cars know to avoid the

72:50

potholes they're you know in their last

72:52

investor Day presentation they they were

72:54

talking about working on uh code that

72:57

could identify potholes what I need here

72:59

is a self-driving golf cart because I'm

73:02

in my golf carts a lot more as you know

73:04

model two my actual car yeah but there

73:07

are a lot of Teslas here and I've been

73:08

in Tesla's I'm not saying they're

73:09

they're not you know they're they're

73:10

decent cars by the way uh Maine musk has

73:13

been at this Resort I had a good

73:15

conversation with her wife oh wow I've

73:16

never seen Elon here but I've seen it do

73:18

you like Elon yes I think I I wish he

73:21

was a friend of mine I mean I think he's

73:22

I think he's an interesting guy very you

73:25

know eccentric I guess as a word for him

73:27

but you know what about Twitter him

73:28

buying Twitter yeah well you know

73:31

I was critical of it

73:34

as an investment okay when I when in

73:36

fact when he first talked about it I

73:38

thought he was just joking with

73:40

everybody just like yanking their chain

73:42

like you know

73:44

um and then he actually did it yeah uh

73:46

and I knew that you know if you if you

73:48

followed my investment advice when he

73:50

was doing I said sell Tesla I said if he

73:52

buys it it's bad for Tesla stock and of

73:54

course that was around the time but one

73:56

of the interesting things is he was able

73:58

to use buying Twitter as an excuse to

74:00

sell a bunch of Tesla yes much higher

74:02

yes you know if he was selling it

74:04

without that it would have raised some

74:06

eyebrows but look I don't really want to

74:07

sell it I need the money to buy it to

74:09

buy Twitter so people like oh you

74:10

overpaid for Twitter yes he did but he

74:12

got a lot more money for his Tesla

74:15

shares and they were so it's you know

74:16

six or one half dozen of the other but

74:19

as a Twitter user right I use Twitter

74:23

quite a bit no no yeah I don't know if

74:25

you followed me of course but I'm

74:27

getting close to a million followers

74:29

maybe you can help me get up there Mike

74:31

920 000 Twitter followers you know I

74:34

tweeted a picture of them they're all

74:36

organic I don't have any you know like

74:39

Bots following I've never I've never

74:40

paid to promote a tweet or to buy a

74:43

subscrib fiber so there is a lot of

74:45

engagement on my site because it's all

74:47

organic it's all real people that are

74:49

interested not only in responding to my

74:52

tweets but responding to the responses

74:55

on my tweets right now with the

74:57

criticism

74:59

oh you know I deal with it you read it

75:01

yes I had to read them all because it's

75:03

too many but I I like too much criticism

75:05

I liked it no to me too many too many

75:07

replies you know there's so much time

75:10

today but as a a Twitter user I'm very

75:14

happy that Elon owns Twitter I think

75:16

he's done a great service public service

75:19

by overpaying for Twitter and making all

75:22

this information known about how Twitter

75:25

Twitter is colluded with the government

75:27

to kind of help you know influence the

75:30

outcome of the 2020 election so what's

75:32

your reaction to that oh I didn't I

75:34

wasn't surprised

75:37

you know it's good to have the proof

75:39

right

75:41

um did you see the Twitter or the um

75:42

Tucker Carlson Jan six videos yeah yeah

75:45

and you know look I I've always believed

75:49

that the last

75:52

uh blew that out of proportion you know

75:56

I mean that it wasn't like an attempt to

75:58

coo it wasn't a violent Insurrection I

76:00

mean people didn't show up with guns

76:02

they had cameras they were they were

76:04

taking selfies they weren't shooting

76:05

anybody and

76:08

um yeah I mean it got out of hand uh but

76:11

I mean I mean they completely blew out

76:14

of proportion and now you see like this

76:16

main guy you've got like a four-year

76:17

prison sentence is being escorted

76:20

through the Capitol building by like

76:22

half a dozen or so uh policemen who are

76:26

like here you go go here oh let me try

76:28

that door for you oh that one's locked

76:29

let's try another one I mean if you're

76:31

walking through the Capitol and you're

76:32

being escorted by the police and not

76:34

only are they not trying to stop you

76:36

they're like helping you why would you

76:38

think that you're doing something wrong

76:40

right and now if he if the footage had

76:43

shown this guy you know like like Rambo

76:45

going through they're like beating all

76:47

these cops up like they're all trying to

76:48

stop him and he was like you know doing

76:50

some kind of karate moves or knocking

76:52

him down he fought his way through okay

76:54

even some head shakes so no don't go

76:57

here right yeah just push the guy out of

76:59

the way you know but no it was like you

77:01

know and where was all that footage

77:02

before I mean why did that guy have

77:04

access to that footage like in his trial

77:06

like to defend himself

77:09

um but you know they they they

77:12

all they did this to discredit obviously

77:15

Trump they didn't want Trump to run

77:16

again they're trying to get him you know

77:18

arrested or tried or whatever it was so

77:20

but the the left lies about everything I

77:22

mean it's not just this I mean it's and

77:24

it's not just a left I mean Republicans

77:26

lie too I mean but the Democrats are

77:28

probably you know better at it but

77:31

I mean if they're gonna lie about

77:33

something like you know January 6 and

77:35

make up all that stuff right well what

77:38

does that tell you about when they're

77:39

giving you economic data they're talking

77:41

about inflation or unemployment I mean

77:43

none of that is true the government lies

77:45

about everything I mean that's at least

77:47

the one thing you can say about

77:48

government is it's consistent right lies

77:51

about everything so on on the note of

77:54

government just last couple questions

77:55

here uh Biden or Newsom I'm sorry

77:59

um DeSantis or Newsome well obviously it

78:02

would be DeSantis I mean you know but

78:04

the question is is it the stantis or or

78:06

who else Republican party yeah you know

78:10

I'm not a big

78:11

Trump

78:13

fan I voted for him the first time I

78:16

can't vote for anybody anymore because I

78:18

live in Puerto Rico so I've given up my

78:20

vote and the trade-off is I've given up

78:23

the income tax so it works for me you

78:25

know my vote was never that valuable and

78:28

normally I vote for the loser Trump was

78:30

one of the few times I voted for the

78:32

winner but I voted in Connecticut and

78:34

Trump lost Connecticut so it was a

78:36

complete waste of time right going to

78:38

the polls and voting Republican in in

78:39

Connecticut you didn't get a mail-in

78:41

ballot no that's when I still live there

78:43

okay I can't vote anymore I don't live

78:45

in Connecticut anymore I live in Puerto

78:46

Rico we can't vote over here right so

78:48

but we also don't have to pay the income

78:50

tax so again it's a trade-off that's

78:52

beneficial pretty much I I think

78:55

everybody I know if I basically ask them

78:57

that question would you give up your

78:59

right to vote if you did not pay any

79:01

income taxes

79:02

I mean it's like sure why would I need

79:04

to vote about paying taxes who cares who

79:06

cares who wins I can't really wow but

79:08

but anyway but it was like a waste when

79:10

I was Voting anyway you know and I lived

79:12

in California for a long time I mean I

79:14

mean I couldn't vote for the winner in

79:16

California

79:16

so I'd vote libertarian no way they had

79:19

no chance right it was just like this is

79:21

only Democrats win just a ceremonial

79:23

like you know vote just to you know

79:25

let's you know give the guy some

79:26

encouragement that that ran keep going

79:30

but the problem I had with Trump

79:32

I mean he's a genuine guy and he did

79:34

some things that were good right which

79:37

at least is better than Biden who's done

79:38

no things that are good right so he's

79:40

done did something is he gonna make it

79:41

to 24. I mean is he going to survive

79:44

live long enough yeah will he be capable

79:46

to run again I don't know look what was

79:48

it what was the other guy that ran with

79:49

a disability that won fetterman yeah

79:52

look at him and I was that was like in

79:53

the hospital right he's not even he

79:55

can't even get into the Senate because

79:57

he so I mean you know he could be like

79:59

you know what was that um not Weekend at

80:01

Bernie's was it but he never Woody Allen

80:03

where they had the leader and he was

80:05

like he ended up he was just like a

80:07

thumb or something or I forget but they

80:10

could find a way to prop him up and just

80:11

like you know let him run right so Trump

80:15

wants to say Trump

80:16

you know Trump was more of a populist he

80:20

didn't end up he didn't go to Washington

80:22

and do what I would have done if I was

80:25

there which is you know drain and swamp

80:27

oh so he didn't no no no he didn't I I

80:29

would have I wanted I would have cut

80:31

spending dramatically I mean across the

80:33

board I wouldn't have created the space

80:35

force I would have gotten rid of like a

80:37

lot of the government agencies I would

80:39

have had big cuts to entitlement Social

80:41

Security Medicare you know you know

80:43

that's very unpopular well that has to

80:45

be done and it takes a real Statesman to

80:49

do it I was hopeful that maybe Trump not

80:51

a career politician would try to do

80:53

what's right and not what's politically

80:55

expedient because no politician is going

80:58

to do what's unpopular that's the

81:00

problem with democracy all the things

81:02

that need to be done are very unpopular

81:04

and it would have been great if Trump

81:07

didn't I mean I would do I wouldn't care

81:09

if I was you know I was President I

81:11

would just do everything that I needed

81:12

to do I wouldn't care if I ever got

81:14

reelected I wouldn't care if people

81:15

didn't like me this is what needs to be

81:18

done is that ever going to happen no I

81:20

mean you know I mean you can't get

81:21

elected telling the truth you have to

81:23

lie to get elected and then you have to

81:24

tell the truth after you get elected but

81:26

that never happens you know the lot you

81:28

lie your way into the White House and

81:29

then you keep lying the whole time

81:31

you're there but Trump was a big spender

81:34

he was a big taxer except he just wanted

81:36

to tax people with tariffs and pretend

81:38

that the Chinese paid him but you know

81:40

and like I'm out of tariffs could be a

81:42

better way of raising taxes than income

81:45

taxes so if you lower income taxes and

81:47

and then put tariffs that's that's a

81:49

positive as far as I'm concerned but he

81:51

didn't do that I mean there were some

81:53

little tax cuts but

81:55

um then you know but

81:58

you know I was like you know in that in

82:01

that race the initial 2020 race my

82:04

candidate was Rand Paul so that's who I

82:07

supported but he kind of fell away Trump

82:09

sucked all the oxygen out of the room in

82:11

fact a lot of uh Iran Paul supporters

82:14

ended up going to Trump yeah Trump was

82:16

more charismatic than ranch right but

82:19

the one reason I would like to see Trump

82:22

president is because of how many people

82:24

would be so pissed off that he got

82:26

elected I mean and the people who I

82:28

again you mean in 24. yes the people

82:30

that I really don't like are the ones

82:31

that will be pissed off I mean they were

82:33

already pissed off when he won the first

82:34

time I see you know

82:36

um so that you know and DeSantis

82:38

wouldn't cut it for you well I mean the

82:39

status is fine I mean but again I don't

82:42

expect he's not a game changer I don't

82:43

think the santis is going to go to

82:48

Washington and do what needs to be done

82:50

but he punished Disney

82:51

you know now he has his board Patrol you

82:54

know but I mean look he's a decent

82:56

Governor I mean I would definitely if I

82:59

had the ability to vote you know my mom

83:02

still lives in Florida she can vote for

83:04

him

83:05

God but um yeah I mean but you know

83:09

I think he'd probably be a better

83:11

candidate than Trump in that I think

83:14

it'll be easier for him to win against

83:16

Biden but I think if 2024 were is biting

83:20

Trump I think Trump will win again

83:22

because

83:23

I think the economy will be so bad by

83:26

2024 it'll be very hard for Biden to run

83:29

on a campaign of four more years right

83:31

right and even though Trump want what we

83:34

just had four more years and even though

83:37

Trump's highly exaggerated how strong

83:39

the economy was when he was president

83:41

just like Biden is exaggerating it now

83:43

people don't even remember what it was

83:45

actually like they just know how lousy

83:47

it is now and he can still say look

83:49

everything was great and then I I handed

83:50

it off to Biden and it's a complete mess

83:52

so I made America great once I'll do it

83:55

again I just got you know so

83:57

that's why they may have to get rid of

83:59

Biden just to have somebody else run

84:01

because you know but I don't know how

84:02

you have another Democrat distance

84:04

themselves from right from Biden right

84:07

right it'd have to be like a Newsome or

84:08

something but it's almost like the

84:09

Democrats want

84:12

Trump to run so because they think they

84:14

can beat them right but that's right but

84:16

that's the mistake they made the first

84:17

time yeah he was like our Dream

84:19

candidate because they thought well he

84:20

can't win and then their their dream

84:22

turned into a nightmare

84:24

last question uh your son is still into

84:27

Bitcoin and you were not yeah I know

84:30

well he's only he's still only 20. so

84:32

but it's not at zero yet no but no I'm

84:36

saying his age no I know but

84:37

conveniently so he's still here over 20.

84:40

I know right the old saying was if

84:41

you're not a uh socialist by the time

84:45

you're you know 18 you don't have a

84:47

heart if you're not a conservative by

84:48

the time you're 28 you don't have a head

84:49

so

84:50

he Stars a few more years to mentally

84:53

grow up and recognize the error of his

84:56

Bitcoin ways but there are a lot of

84:58

adults in my neighborhood here that are

85:00

into Bitcoin or other crypto this is a

85:03

nice neighborhood yeah well they got in

85:05

early you know and they were able to

85:07

cash out that's why they can afford to

85:09

live here but the people who bought

85:11

their Bitcoin they're not going to look

85:12

forward to live here because they're

85:13

going to lose all their money when uh

85:16

the bubble pops but yeah I haven't been

85:17

able to convince my son

85:19

he is

85:22

as committed in his belief now he's kind

85:25

of a Bitcoin Maximo so he doesn't like

85:27

all the other cryptos okay he's just

85:29

Bitcoin right so now I mean we just went

85:32

from 69 000 to 15 000 uh you had the

85:35

collapse of FTX you have the potentially

85:37

near collapse of binance they're

85:39

obviously still around uh what's a good

85:42

way to take I mean if if Bitcoins are

85:44

able to survive that uh and falling to

85:46

15K and rebounding why would it go away

85:49

maybe it is an inflation hedge well you

85:52

know

85:53

nothing goes down in a straight line

85:56

okay

85:57

there are a lot of people

85:59

with a vested interest in maintaining

86:02

the price of Bitcoin

86:03

so there are people that are we're there

86:06

to buy

86:08

um but I I don't expect Bitcoin to make

86:12

a new high

86:13

okay

86:15

um I think after this consolidation is

86:18

over you know as we're doing this

86:19

interview it's around 22 000.

86:21

but I do expect during this year for

86:24

Bitcoin to break down and and take out

86:27

the lows from last year or whatever it

86:29

was 15 16 000. I think we'll probably

86:32

trade under 10 000 before the end of the

86:34

year I guess

86:36

will we close below I don't know I mean

86:38

they're probably by the dip again

86:40

um but

86:42

you know then maybe the following year

86:43

we'll take out five thousand or one

86:45

thousand but I I do expect the rest of

86:48

the air to come out of this bubble

86:50

um as inflation remains sticky and yeah

86:53

and it's not a it proves that it's not a

86:55

hedge uh it's not digital gold it

86:59

doesn't have any properties in common

87:01

with gold it's just a a collectible

87:04

token digital token

87:06

uh but it doesn't have any actual value

87:09

I mean it's not good as a medium

87:11

exchange or a unit of account can't be a

87:14

store of value because there's no value

87:15

at the store

87:17

but yeah it has a price because people

87:19

think it it's going to go up so people

87:22

are willing to buy it and hold it you

87:24

don't think the international trade or

87:26

being able to send money overseas

87:27

through blockchain well you're not

87:29

sending money you're sending Bitcoin

87:31

right it's the difference you know but

87:33

you in now in theory you can sell that

87:35

Bitcoin and get money sure but what if

87:38

you can't what if the price collapses

87:40

and then when you go to sell it you

87:41

can't get much money for your Bitcoin

87:44

um but you know you can do the same

87:46

thing

87:47

with

87:49

uh cryptocurrencies that are actually

87:51

backed by something you know I've been

87:53

talking about this uh and this is what I

87:56

believe is the future of blockchain or

87:59

cryptocurrency stable style coins right

88:02

but not stable to a fiat currency like

88:04

the dollar but stable to real money like

88:06

gold so if you're really looking for an

88:09

alternative to a Fiat system but one

88:12

that is easily incorporated into online

88:16

transactions sure where you can send

88:19

your uh tokens around the world quickly

88:22

and for a low cost

88:25

this solution is at tokenized Gold it's

88:29

to have a central depository or private

88:32

company wherever governments anybody can

88:34

do it you take gold you tokenize that

88:37

gold and now the tokens are freely

88:40

tradable they're redeemable in Gold if

88:42

somebody wants the gold they can take

88:44

the tokens and take delivery to Gold but

88:46

more likely they can exchange the tokens

88:49

use them as a media exchange uh

88:52

businesses could use them as a unit of

88:54

account animated exchange everybody can

88:56

use it as a store of value and then you

88:58

have a real currency backed by real

89:01

money except it's a crypto digital

89:03

currency as opposed to uh paper currency

89:05

but you know before we had Fiat money

89:08

then it's real digital gold right well

89:11

yeah it's not yeah it's a digital

89:13

representation of actual gold right

89:15

Bitcoin is a digital representation of

89:17

nothing they depict Bitcoin like the

89:20

coin they make this gold coin they put a

89:22

b in there but there is no actual coin

89:24

anywhere there's no substance and that's

89:27

why there's no difference between a

89:29

Bitcoin and a Satoshi I mean the only

89:31

difference in a Bitcoin and a Satoshi is

89:33

that one Satoshi is 100 million Bitcoin

89:35

or one Bitcoin is 100 million Satoshi

89:37

but I can't do anything more with a

89:40

Bitcoin than I can with a Satoshi

89:42

because I can't do anything with a

89:43

Satoshi it doesn't matter how many I

89:45

have relative to let's say I think you

89:46

posted a silver article where you

89:48

mentioned look silver is used in solar

89:51

there's actual uh conductive property to

89:53

Silver yes and the more silver you have

89:56

the more you can use it in Industry I

89:58

mean there's a difference between having

89:59

a gram of silver and an ounce of silver

90:01

I can do a lot more with an ounce but I

90:04

can't do anything more with 100 million

90:06

satoshi's than I can with one other than

90:08

I can give them away I can trade them

90:11

but there's nothing you could do with

90:13

with any of them even if I had all 21

90:15

million Bitcoin what could I do with

90:17

them nothing I couldn't do a thing one

90:21

question from Twitter that seems to be a

90:23

question a lot of people have is why

90:25

have gold prices been flat for years

90:27

with inflation soaring

90:29

yeah you know well you got to go back

90:32

over the last 20 years or so 20 years

90:35

ago gold was under 300.

90:38

and it had a big run up to 1900 and 10

90:41

years so that was a big move and so it

90:43

spent the last decade or so kind of

90:46

consolidating that move

90:49

and so gold is an inflation head but

90:52

doesn't mean it's going to be perfectly

90:54

correlated you know every year

90:57

it's over longer periods of time that

91:00

it's going to hold its value I think

91:02

that gold got ahead of itself when it

91:04

ran up to 1900 I think it's behind where

91:07

it should be now

91:09

but a lot of that again has to do with

91:12

the false expectations that people have

91:16

about the future trajectory of interest

91:19

rates and inflation

91:21

when more people recognize reality and

91:25

eventually they will right Abraham

91:27

Lincoln said you could fool some of the

91:30

people all the time and all the people

91:31

some of the time but you can't fool all

91:33

the people all the time right So

91:35

eventually

91:36

uh the people the bond market the gold

91:39

market is going to wake up to reality

91:42

and then there's a lot of catching up to

91:45

do in Gold I mean all of a sudden the

91:47

sellers are going to disappear and the

91:49

buyers are going to you know you know

91:52

increase in number and the price can

91:55

shoot up very quickly so let's say the

91:56

price of gold which is now around 1800.

92:00

it could have one year where it moves up

92:02

to five thousand right from eighteen

92:04

hundred

92:05

and all of a sudden hey wait a minute

92:07

now go back over the last year and it's

92:10

kept pace right because all of a sudden

92:12

it has a big move in one year and now

92:14

you you know you've caught up so some

92:16

people just

92:18

lose patience well that's what Kathy

92:20

Wood says just wait five more years

92:22

uh oh for her stocks yeah yeah well you

92:24

know we're waiting for Godot waiting for

92:27

those stocks to come back but there's a

92:28

difference between

92:30

a valuable commodity and a money losing

92:33

company I mean because that's five more

92:34

years of losses it's assuming the

92:36

company could survive uh those losses

92:39

but yeah I mean like I said I think that

92:41

bubble's already popped and so it's

92:44

difficult to reflate another one

92:47

um a lot of people think oh look at

92:48

Bitcoin right the bubble has popped so

92:49

many times

92:50

you know it really hasn't I mean it's

92:52

it's just been one big bubble ever since

92:54

it started in 2009 2010.

92:58

um but I I do think it's you know it's

93:01

as I said I think it's likely likely

93:03

Peak and I think you know

93:05

the p coincided with the meme stocks and

93:10

the nfts and uh El Salvador and you know

93:16

the Super Bowl commercials Miami hype

93:19

right I mean 2021 I mean was massive

93:23

blowout top because you have to ask you

93:25

know ask yourself it was like all this

93:27

money that was spent advertising

93:28

promoting pumping and Bitcoin went down

93:31

how come because all the people spending

93:33

all that money to advertise were the

93:35

ones selling oh right so it was just

93:37

like it was a distribution top where a

93:40

lot of the Insiders like distributed all

93:42

their crap to the Mom and Pops who you

93:45

know

93:46

saw somebody on Instagram you know who

93:49

was touting a coin or you know Tick Tock

93:52

you know all these influencers jumped on

93:54

the bandwagon and were paid all kinds of

93:57

money oh yeah right I mean was it

93:59

Kardashian they got fined by the SEC yep

94:03

um but all these pop stars and athletes

94:05

you know they all got sucked in with

94:06

look what happened to Poor Tom Brady you

94:08

know he got sucked into FTX

94:11

um but that was the peak that was the

94:12

end of it all that was like you know you

94:14

know they rang a bell and hey it's over

94:16

you know everybody is in you know this

94:18

is it and so but people just don't

94:20

recognize that that that that's over but

94:23

a lot of money is going to be made

94:25

uh

94:27

has the bubble deflates right I mean a

94:29

lot of people are going to lose money

94:31

well the people who get out have already

94:34

made money but

94:36

there's a lot of money to be made I mean

94:37

I I did really well

94:39

as an investor between 2002 and 2008

94:44

because all the stocks I was buying

94:47

during the NASDAQ bubble that didn't go

94:49

anywhere just went way up in between

94:52

2008 to 2002 and 2008 I mean great

94:56

returns so I was able to harvest the

94:58

returns that I that I planted during

95:00

that bubble so I think a lot of the

95:02

positions that I have now that I've been

95:04

building over the years I think the

95:06

profits are really going to start to

95:07

come in as the rest of the air comes out

95:09

of that bubble the way it did following

95:11

the the bursting of the the bubble in

95:14

2000. wow well this has been incredible

95:17

uh Peter how do people get in touch with

95:18

you you've got shiftradio.com at Peter

95:22

Schiff it looks like pretty much on

95:23

everything and uh Twitter YouTube

95:25

Facebook Instagram what am I missing

95:28

here

95:29

well you know you got my podcast the

95:31

Peter shift show which is shift radio

95:32

you can listen to it also on my YouTube

95:34

channel

95:36

um I don't got I don't have your kind of

95:38

numbers yet on YouTube actually I think

95:41

you just came out of the blue and just

95:42

like passed me you know because I I have

95:45

about like a little over half a million

95:47

oh yeah and you what are you a couple

95:48

million now or right around there yeah

95:50

yeah so I mean but so but I'm on YouTube

95:52

so you can find me there you get my

95:54

podcast

95:56

um but the most important thing is if

95:58

you're listening to me to tell your

96:01

friends to listen because we need to

96:03

grow the army of people who know the

96:05

truth and understand economics and you

96:08

know and you know people are getting

96:10

brainwashed at universities so I need to

96:13

get more young people you know uh to to

96:16

to listen and I have a good young

96:18

audience I mean they can't afford to be

96:20

clients of mine but that's fine you know

96:22

maybe they'll be clients in the future

96:23

how can people reach out to you to be a

96:25

client of yours yeah well there you can

96:28

get a hold of me through my main website

96:31

now is europac.com

96:33

europac.com and that's from my asset

96:35

management company and you can call us

96:38

you can fill out a form online and one

96:40

of the representatives will get back to

96:42

you uh to talk about our investment

96:44

strategies see you know whether or not

96:47

uh they'd fit into your your portfolio

96:51

um also for physical precious metals you

96:53

can you know go to shift gold

96:55

and buy physical gold and silver and you

96:59

won't get ripped off the problem in the

97:01

industry today is that so many people

97:03

are over charging for their gold and

97:06

silver big markups and they pay

97:08

celebrities to go out and endorse them

97:10

and then they pay the celebrities a lot

97:12

of money so now they got to overcharge

97:13

their customers to pay the celebrities

97:15

we don't do any of that we don't shift

97:17

gold doesn't advertise at all it's just

97:19

my followers going by and so it's very

97:21

low markups right and so it's the best

97:24

way to go out and buy physical gold and

97:26

silver but also if you don't want to

97:28

have an account with my firm you don't

97:30

want me to you know you want to you

97:32

don't want to set up another account

97:33

which I encourage people to do I think

97:34

it's worth the effort but if you're one

97:36

of those do-it-yourselfers and you've

97:38

got you know an account at Schwab or

97:40

Fidelity or you know Interactive Broker

97:42

any of these discount brokerage firms

97:44

you can buy my mutual funds my mutual

97:46

funds are on the platform they're there

97:48

the Europe Pacific fund family I've got

97:49

a global value fund the dividend pair

97:51

funds those are the ones that are

97:53

crushing it according to their

97:55

competition is there a ticker those yeah

97:57

you know you can go get them on my

97:58

website and then buy them anywhere right

98:00

just go to europac.com and look at the

98:02

mutual funds okay I've got a goal fund

98:04

I've got an emerging market fund and a

98:05

foreign bond fund so those are my five

98:07

funds and you can buy them anywhere

98:09

Emerging Market would that include China

98:11

and both from China yeah you know more

98:13

Hong Kong uh only a couple of mainland

98:16

China names in there but I'm bullish on

98:18

China you know the only reason we don't

98:20

have more China I think is just worries

98:22

about like some kind of sanctions that

98:24

like force us to have to sell like oh

98:26

you have to divest yeah and now of

98:28

course when you do that you're not going

98:29

to get a good price right when when

98:30

you're forced when you're forced to sell

98:32

and everybody's being forced to sell the

98:34

the lucky ones are the ones that get to

98:36

buy

98:37

right so that's why I don't believe in

98:39

any of this the government should not be

98:41

uh restricting Americans and if they

98:44

want you know on where they can invest

98:46

their money wow you know it doesn't

98:47

actually make any difference I mean if

98:49

it's a publicly traded stock and you say

98:51

Americans can't hold it it's not going

98:53

to change anything for the company all

98:55

it means is the American is going to end

98:57

up losing money and some Foreigner is

98:59

going to take advantage of of the

99:01

American who's been sacrificed by his

99:03

own government right that shared

99:04

dilution goes away they get more value

99:06

or or the Chinese get to buy back the

99:08

shares on the discount yeah right and

99:10

the Chinese citizens benefit the

99:12

Americans suffer and I don't even think

99:14

it's legal I mean the way it's

99:15

deprivation of property without due

99:17

process it's not you know you know and

99:20

we're not at war with China I mean

99:22

there's you know it's not like you know

99:23

I mean it's trying to get invade Taiwan

99:25

though I don't know I don't know but um

99:28

that'll be for part two that'll be there

99:30

I hope they don't I mean you know I mean

99:32

I don't like War you know I don't like

99:34

the war that's going on right now in the

99:35

Ukraine and I think if we hadn't gotten

99:38

involved I think it would have ended a

99:39

long time ago wow so we're keeping it

99:42

going I think so I mean maybe not by

99:43

ourselves we've got some European

99:45

Partners but I think uh the Russians and

99:49

the ukrainians would have been much

99:50

better off with a quick resolution yeah

99:52

in fact they would have been better off

99:53

if they avoided the conflict in the

99:55

first place which should have been done

99:56

it was a it was a it was a it was a

99:58

diplomacy failure that this even

100:00

happened oh yeah and now we're bragging

100:03

about the fact that oh the war has been

100:04

going on for a year that's not a success

100:06

that's a failure that that they're still

100:09

at War yeah Peter all right thank you so

100:12

much for inviting me into your home

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.