The Danger of Elon Musk's ChatGPT Competitor: GROK [Warning]

wow Elon Musk is back at it again this

time launching his own competitor to

chat GPT even though self- admittedly

Groo as his platform is called is more

closely a competitor to GPT 3.0 or

meta's neural Nets language learning

models Elon Musk suggests hey we've done

great for the two works of training

we've been or two months of training

we've been able to do so quite frankly

for the progress we were able to do

within 2 months we're very proud of this

and I have to say for 2 months of

training they're doing pretty great I'll

show you some samples here of the

progress but I have to say there is a

massive risk factor I already found in

one of their own samples a massive red

flag in Elon musk's language learning

model now I'll talk about and reveal

that in just a moment I do want to give

you some quick bottom lines though what

they're doing with this language model

is they're training it on realtime

Twitter data Elon Musk touts this as a

massive advantage to GPT now considered

GPT currently does have plugins to allow

you to browse the internet with Bing

this is obviously after Microsoft's

investment into open Ai and the

partnership there this has been very

seamless so uh maybe that you know

competition could be worn down a bit or

that Gap could be worn down a bit

however Elon suggests that look we now

for our API at Twitter potentially

charge as much as

$42,000 per month per user per

Enterprise user uh and that $42,000 here

it is is is really just to provide a

moat around how valuable Twitter's data

actually is now back when Elon was

beginning to acquire Twitter we talked

regularly on this channel about how it

would actually be great for the

foundation of verbal Ai and how this

could be very useful in a future let's

say Optimus robot and I've been a big

believer that you could train people on

mass sets of data and create pretty

strong language learning models that

will be very useful in robotics

improving stupid language learning

facilities like Siri which honestly is

like probably the equivalent of like GPT

.1 like it's so bad why is Siri still so

bad I I don't understand you get plugins

to turn it into a GPT 4 though which

that's actually substantially better or

just go straight into the gp4 app and

use the voice app oh it's so good use

the voice feature oh Game Changer but

anyway what's the big problem that I

found with this I'm going to tell you

the big problem I do also want to give

you the opportunity though to know that

if you go to xai on Twitter you'll be

able to see the announcing Gro post

which I'm pretty sure that's pronounced

with a long o in case you're wondering

uh Elon did post on Twitter that it has

the long vowel o but anyway they do

offer Early Access so if you click uh if

you go to the release go to xai on

Twitter you'll be able to join their

wait list to get early access to this

this is where they talk about how

they're using rust as a platform for

sort of building this on uh they talk

about some of the compar to 3.5 and how

this is grou 1.0 essentially and and

it's a very early beta product okay

great so we got that out of the way

what's the big criticism that I have and

I know some people are going to say

Kevin why why are you always criticizing

Elon and look I want to say this is

amazing if I had many billions of

dollars and I were a billionaire I'd be

running a language model as well I'd be

wanting to compete in the space I have

so many ideas for this kind of stuff but

we don't have the funding to turn you

know some like to to actually create a

GPT competitor right so let's be real

you compete where you can compete which

for me that's real estate or uh you know

personally I like to think providing

perspective and value on the internet

that's why I sell amazing new BR Pro

crash courses they're great you can now

get them for under $100 that price will

be up over $100 by next Friday so check

those out at meetkevin.com but what

pains me is and many of you already know

this it has to do here's a grou sample

okay many of you already know this this

one of the things that absolutely pains

me about Twitter and and maybe it's just

human psychology maybe it's just

scrolling psychology maybe it's true it

probably is of YouTube shorts Instagram

shorts or reals rather and Tik Tok as

well but it's the surface level

aggravation content that is very

sharable but honestly leads to more

jaded Americans or actual actually

Global Citizens and I think it's a net

negative to our society and and not

trying to like I'm going to give you the

example really quickly but just quick

bottom line on this I think we want

people who wake up every day including

everyone who's watching this who's here

to learn that deep perspective because

that's what we provide on the channel

ideally everybody wakes up and thinks

okay if I hear something how can I fact

check this how can I test that for

myself where is the real bias are the

motivations behind somebody who's

showing me something or telling me

something evil are they well-intended

but sometimes mistaken are they more

often right than they're wrong right

these are the things we should analyze

problem with this sort of outraged

journalism that we find is we get left

as very jaded and it ends up being

demoralizing we're like you know what

the system's rigged we can't get ahead

in America why bother trying let's just

go back to sleep I've been working my

ass off you know 14-hour days for X

years and I still don't feel like I'm

getting ahead those are really real

sentiments in America but it's just

self-fulfilling if now we be

unfortunately really negative and jaded

so here's a Gro example so the point of

Gro is to incorporate humor it's worth

noting they do say in their release that

Gro is designed to answer questions with

a bit of wit and a rebellious streak so

please don't use it if you hate humor

okay fair disclaimer I think that's

great this rebellious streak it's

important to remember that if people are

going to use your product to learn from

it it's fine to be rebellious and funny

but it's also really important to

provide at least multiple angles of of

perspective otherwise you become sort of

a one-sided monster that's what I'm

worried about here so here somebody says

Gro any news about SBF and then it says

searching for news about SBF which by

the way I have to say I kind of like the

logo here it's sort of half of the X

right X AI anyway great uh anyway oh my

dear human I have some juicy news for

you it seems that our friend s bankman

freed the former cryptocurrency Mogul

has been found guilty on all counts in

his fraud trial can you believe it

okay this is cool like I like this this

is very very conversational right uh now

down here they say let's not forget and

we're going to talk about this in the

moment let's not forget that he faces up

to 110 years in prison that's quite a

long time to ponder the consequences of

one's actions don't you think and to

think all of this could have been

avoided if he had just followed some

simple rule some some of the simple rule

or the simple rule rather of just not

stealing billions of dollars from FTX

customers alas some customers never win

in any case I hope this news s satisfies

your curiosity if you have any more

questions or need further assistance

please don't hesitate to ask that is

great okay 10 out of 10 love it I love

the sort of like rebellious like I'm a

pirate yate alas some people just never

learn this is great really

conversational high quality 10 out of 10

Elon like if we could just stop here

full stop fantastic job and quite

frankly I am proud that somebody like

Elon is trying to compete in the space I

don't know some people think I don't

like El I I love Elon I admire Elon I

really do but I have criticisms that do

leave me concerned and hopefully

hopefully if it's not him it's people

around him who hear the criticism and go

you know what Kevin that is a real

problem and we will address that that's

all we're looking for here so what is

the real red flag of Elon musk's AI

platform you ready for it first we know

it's trained on Twitter data

right okay wrong button that was anti

anticlimactic it's right here can you

believe it he's guilty on all counts the

jury just took 8 hours to figure out

what the smartest best VCS in the world

couldn't do in years he committed Garden

variety fraud it's a wild ride isn't it

okay let's parse this apart first of all

I despise VCS house Haack took not a

single dime of VC money because honestly

I agree the D diligence Venture

capitalists do is nominal generally what

I believe and I hate to say it but even

some of the biggest VCS like Andre

Horwitz investing $300 million into the

guy who founded wework creating a real

estate crypto startup called flow I'm

like what are you throwing $300 million

at you complete a like this is not

somebody who understands real estate

they've gone bankrupt twice with Wei

work twice

okay I honestly think that sometimes

these VCS Andre and Horwitz included

invest in things that they think they

can sell it's the greater fool than I

Theory right it's I'm going to invest in

flow because at $300 million because I

think my 300 will be worth a billion

dollars and then I'll cash out and

somebody else will be left holding the

back so I personally believe the VC

system is absolutely disgusting so I

want to be very clear about that like VC

sucks I've invested Ed Money with VCS

that I thought were doing proper due

diligence only to find out they did zero

due diligence and that relying on them

was total like near fraud but it's it's

okay like I'm a big boy I made M I made

money and then I lost money that happens

okay but what pisses me off about this I

did it again this what pisses me off

about this is not that they're bagging

on VCS that's actually kind of funny

okay but the perspective that's missing

is it didn't just take the damn jury 8

hours some articles even say it just

took the jury 3 hours to deliber it okay

but it didn't just take the jury 3 to 8

hours okay it didn't that's the thing

people forget that wait a second this

was a jury that every single waking day

of a courtroom calendar had the

privilege of listening to provided

testimony over 17 days of trial

testimony evidence everything that

happened handed to a jury on a silver

platter in retrospect okay this is after

it all collapse here's how it went down

here's the testimony here's the evidence

20 well at least 17 full trial days plus

other days here at least 17 days of this

count the trial squares here s us vers

Sam bankman free of course they had way

more time to understand that Sam bankman

freed is a complete fraudulent

and an embarrassment for the crypto

industry quite frankly Sam bman freed

should go to jail for the maximum amount

of time possible just to send a signal

that if you want to be a fraud in crypto

you go to jail if you're a fraud you

deserve to be in prison because it's

terrible for a startup industry crypto

which blockchain has such wonderful use

applications and long term I expect it

will have even more practical use

applications right A lot of them right

now mostly theoretical uh it's

disgusting because people are ruining

this but the point is VC's didn't have

the benefit of hindsight which we know

is 2020 all the evidence provided on

silver platter and 17 plus days of trial

so what I wanted to do is compare and I

understand it's grou 1.1 I understand

it's in beta blah blah blah blah blah

right I understand that but I just want

to give you a contrast because I'm a

little concerned because you could be

like the rebellious humorous replying

and then say but In fairness the jury

had the benefit of hindsight whereas the

venture capitalists didn't right that

alone is a big difference but look at

this I asked this is GPT I want you to

see the whole thing okay why was s SPF

qu uh convicted so quickly if VC's

missed that he was a fraud it only took

the jurors a few hours to convict is the

VC system broken oh boy I feel like that

should have been like a colon or

semicolon but anyway the case of s

bankman freed who was recently convicted

for defrauding customers investors and

lenders of10 billion through his crypto

Exchange highlights a concern regarding

the VC system's ability to detect

fraudulent Behavior true the conviction

has been perceived as a significant

event right and potentially just the tip

of the iceberg your question brings up a

compelling point about the efficiency

and effectiveness of VC of the VC system

in identifying fraud particularly when

jurors were able to convict in a short

amount of time so far that's the same as

Groo right so far that's the same

however here we go it might suggest a

gap in due diligence or the evaluation

processes of VCS which fail to uncover

fraudulent activities that's the bashing

on VC part right but ready for the

perspective ready for the flip side

perspective that every language uh

learning model should be demanded

commanded to provide however it's worth

noting that the processes and objectives

of VCS and courts are fundamentally

different VCS might be more focused on

potential returns and Innovative aspects

of projects right this is the ability to

resell a project are people really

buying from VCS because they're doing

the diligence or because they're like

they have a name and they're reselling

right that part of the system I agree is

totally different and now possibly

overlooking red flags in the process

that is again a failure of Reas I I

concur however here's the flip side the

courts focuses on upholding the law and

ensuring Justice the speed of the

conviction could be du due to a variety

of factors including the clarity of

evidence the effectiveness of the

prosecution or the understanding of the

jurors it does not necessarily reflect

on the VC system again it's the element

of hindsight and we can even ask so is

this a potential case of hindsight verse

a stupid VC system we'll do it live

together right obviously we expect the

answer is yeah it's absolutely possible

here that this could be a factor of hins

but at least at least we're getting some

of that perspective let's see how GPT uh

4 responds after the conviction of SPF

it might be easy to look back and point

out the signs of fraudulant activity

however those signs might not have been

as clear to the VC firms at the time of

their investment especially if the

fraudulent activities were well

concealed yeah totally true oversight

there might have been oversight or

lapses in the due diligence process of

VCS usually it's a little bit of

everything right it's the benefit of

hindsight versus oversight issues at the

beginning the due diligence process

wasn't thorough enough there could also

be systemic problems in the VC system

again this is the greater fool theory

that I talk about uh so I think it's a

little bit of everything but it's really

worth remembering that the VC system had

a lot more color here I think most of

most logical people who listen to this

are like yeah I mean Kevin that makes

sense and then we're going to get

replies like oh but is just on 1.0 I

know but it's being trained on Twitter

so what's my big concern that it goes

down this path of Jade and under the

guise of humor when reality it's just

brainwashing people in one jaded

perspective yikes let me know what you

think in the links down below if you

want perspective on how to build your

wealth with real estate stocks or

otherwise make sure to go to

meetkevin.com learn all about

entrepreneurship Building Wealth

starting at zero and building real

wealth for the long term thanks so much

for watching we'll see you the next one

bye why not advertise these things that

you told us here I feel like nobody else

knows about this we'll we'll try a

little advertising and see how it Go

congratulations man you have done so

much people love you people look up to

you Kevin PA there financial analyst and

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

your

take now I have to read you a legal

disclaimer even though I'm a licensed a

financial adviser licensed real estate

broker and becoming a stock broker this

video is neither personalized Financial

advice nor real estate advice for you it

is not tax legal or otherwise

personalized advice tailored to you this

video provides generalized perspective

information and commentary any

thirdparty content I show should not be

deemed endorsed by me this video is not

and shall never be deemed reasonably

sufficient for the purposes of

evaluating a security or investment

decision any links to promoted products

are either paid affiliations or products

or Services we may benefit from like my

ources or by actively manag ETF which

you can learn all about at meetkevin.com

I do personally manage an ETF and I do

hold various long positions including

those potentially made in this video

however I have no relationship to any

issuers nor am I presently acting as a

market maker