YIKES! Kamala Harris a “Danger” as President | Left-Wing FREAKOUT

well just as covid tests are coming back

after the Democratic National Committee

showing quite frankly a spike of covid

results at the event The Economist which

absolutely despises Donald Trump and

leans

left just hosed kamla Harris this was

shocking to me I listened to the

economist an audio form and I had to

pull up these articles because I just

couldn't believe what I heard they went

as far as calling kamla Harris a danger

and the details of it blew my mind

because I know on oneand they don't like

Trump so maybe this is a warning to Caba

or it's a sign of something worse but

for what it's worth here we go The

Economist kamla Harris can beat Trump

but how would she govern now the article

headline doesn't seem that bad but it's

f under personality and policy which you

know I like peee so it's perfect all

right let's get into it so they start

off by saying ah kamla Harris she gave

us her background she worked at

McDonald's blah blah blah blah blah okay

where is the meat of it here we go I'm

going to read it to you because honestly

they say it really well unfortunately

how that would translate into a Harris

presidency remains disconcertingly vague

that is all of this background how that

would translate right she has reasons

for building her campaign around

personality policy can be a liability Mr

Trump is no wonk and with him as an

opponent Character Matters in other

words hey you know she's got the

character maybe to beat Trump she

doesn't have some of the charges or

allegations that Trump passed but what

about policy like you know it's kind of

important when it comes to President

right yet worryingly her tactics may

also signal something fundamental about

her personality hm okay in the Biden

Administration kamla Harris was

overshadowed she has taken few questions

from reporters and her policy platform

was mostly inherited from her boss Joe

Biden and it's even sparer than Donald

Trump's policy platform when she takes

positions such as vowing to deal with

corporate price gauging

uh gauging I said gauging it's gouging

but she actually said gauging so it was

stuck in my memory she misspoke and said

gauging it's gouging but anyway when she

takes position positions such as vowing

to deal with corporate price gouging

they may not be expressions of her

political beliefs in so much as campaign

Maneuvers designed to Plate voters

worried about the cost of living in

other words people bag on Trump

sometimes for they call him saying

anything Donald like I'll just say

anything to get votes The Economist

which generally supports the left and

and frankly

Democrats is here saying that kamla

Harris might just be saying stuff to

Plate people because she doesn't have an

actual policy to

enact our briefing this week sets to

make sense of all of this in the Senate

and as a politician in California Mr

Harris gave us some Clues she is not one

of those career individuals who has deep

convictions or inner core beliefs

instead just like Mr Biden she positions

herself slightly to the left of center

and then adjusts as that Center evolves

worse than Joe Biden her policies on the

economy and on Foreign Affairs seem to

be unanchored now this is where it gets

scary pragmatism has its virtues in a

politician in other words being

practical and negot NE iations or

whatever else has its virtues Mr Trump

may call Mrs Harris a communist but she

is no ideologue in other words she's

probably not a communist but listen to

this her positions as a primary

candidate in 2019 included a

single-payer Health Care System

outlawing fracking and decriminalizing

crossing the border illegally in other

words letting people cross the border

illegally now Mrs Harris has abandoned

all of that into 2024 suggesting all of

her previous policy was never serious

her recent anti-price gouging proposal

would be hard to enact and she is

probably not about to launch a crusade

against Corporate America pragne ISM

also means that Mrs Harris is open to

other people's ideas there is reason to

think that in foreign policy and the

environment she will be set out to

create continuity in other words just do

what Biden did before for her okay but

when pragmatism signals a lack of

thought through principles in other

words if you reach into your bag of

principles and you don't have any there

you just kind of do what other people

tell you to do you know whatever Nancy

Pelosi tells you to do on the phone or

you know when Joe Biden wakes up what he

tells you to do it can quote spell

danger The Economist is literally

calling the Democratic nominee a danger

and they lean left and I hate Donald

Trump's guts every day the president has

to handle politically charged problems

that have no simple solution in this Mrs

Harris's weakness for bad ideas and

political gimmicks threatens to be a

liability the claim of PR price gouging

is simply not supported by evidence but

it nonetheless erodes the faith in

capital markets open markets this is

intense they're basically calling her

somebody without

ideals without

principles without a backbone and

somebody who could be a liability in

foreign policy and on the

economy on top of that somebody who

doesn't believe in open markets which

make America prosperous as The Economist

they also argue that these $25,000 home

buyer grants are supposed grants are

supposed to help first-time home buyers

yet she also succeeds in her plan to

increase yet unless rather she also

succeeds in her plan to increase the

supply of housing a tall order subsidies

would just simply raise the prices of

homes making homes more unaffordable not

more

affordable then when it comes to raising

the child tax credit The Economist

argues how is she going to deal with a

budget deficit of 7% of GDP because

their failure to finance it through

taxes would be rash and

inflationary the only way The Economist

would recommend Harris is as an

alternative to Trump they again they

they don't really like Trump right but

when there's a criticism from the left

of KLA Harris I'm like oh that's

interesting it's not like I'm reading

Fox News here which you know says bad

things about KLA Harris every day this

is a left of center economic magazine

and they actually have really good stuff

which is why I listen to them which is

why I pay attention to what they say to

get their perspective likewise without

strong fundamental beliefs and a set of

guiding principles they're basically

calling her empty the president can

easily be blown off course by events

when presidents are reactive or

indecisive they may be challenged abroad

this is a reference to Putin maybe

challenging her or xiin Bing or Kim

Jong-un or

whatever if Mrs Harris struggles to knit

together her biography her principles

and her policies she will also struggle

in a president's crucial role explaining

to the no Nation how it should fight an

adversary her overriding task is to

defeat Trump and it's a vital one again

this is where they show that they're

anti-trump

right now what else they say is should

Harris's personality lose its power to

propel her campaign forward in other

words should that sort of like initial

sugar high of the Harris campaign and

the Harris personality and you know

somebody who can actually like stay

awake for a debate or whatever lose

value policy could be the only way to

revive her campaign they say imagine if

her whole platform were like her

position on women's Reproductive Rights

where her policy is clearly derived from

principles and set out from her own

experiences now this isn't a video about

abortion it's just simply to say they're

like look she has a very clear stance on

abortion and women's rights and

codifying access to abortion but she

doesn't have that for the other elements

of her policy and that's really bad

because it potentially leaves you with a

back boneless leader now there's

actually surprisingly a second piece

from The Economist on this I mean I'm

going to have to pitch life insurance to

kamla Harris here soon by the way you

can get life insurance as well in as

little as 5 minutes by going to

metkevin.com life it's a paid

affiliation and partnership with the

channel metkevin.com lifee check them

out it's the same life insurance Lord

and I use and we Apple pay or Android

pay for it it's pretty easy and

automated check it out mavin.com life

anyway Mrs Harris in short would like to

fight the election on Broad values

rather than nitty-gritty proposals okay

interesting her her stance is not

explained even though her thinking has

evolved so in other words why why have

you flip-flopped on so many positions

but you're not giving us very very clear

details her campaign website just like

Mr Biden's doesn't have any policy at

all at least Donald Trump has some like

The Economist is literally having to go

out of their way to go I mean Trump has

some policy why don't you it's

crazy uh it's funny as I'm watching as

I'm talking about this oh they removed

the banner uh fo Fox just had a little

banner up there Joy is not a policy I

flip between them during the day between

uh CNN and fox and MSNBC and Bloomberg

and CNBC and stuff so I just flip around

but anyway saw that as I was filming

this I'm like oh yeah Newsome exposes

undemocratic Democrat deal making well

that's not a

surprise I ran against that guy for

governor the stuff they do in California

is entertaining but anyway Democrats are

so elated that their candidate can speak

in complete sentences that few are

inclined to press her to take stances

she would find awkward Mr Trump's loud

protest about her vague agenda and the

dirth of media interviews have fallen on

DEA years uh this is basically a way of

saying that the kamla Harris campaign

isn't reacting to and and therefore

turning around and going to do more

interviews it's kind of like okay is

that all you got and they're kind of

kind of letting it roll off the back so

to speak anyway uh K Harris tries to

discuss the possibility of project 2025

which they rightfully say that Trump has

disowned and when she gave her speech in

Raleigh North Carolina where she was

supposed to give an economic agenda she

basically gave us the populist we're

going to prevent price scouching

discussion so then you look a little bit

deeper into her history The Economist

here argues that K Harris opposed trade

deals such as Mr Obama's

TPP and Donald Trump's

usmca saying that protections for

workers and the environment were

inadequate as VP she traveled the world

uh on behalf of Biden to help alleviate

problems fueling migration from El

Salvador Guatemala and Honduras remember

do not come anyway but the Biden

administration's big foreign policy

challenges the withdrawal from

Afghanistan support for Ukraine Israel

Hamas competition with China those

weren't up to kamla those were up to

people like Jake Sullivan and Anthony

blinkin Bill Burns now you could argue

that you don't like those people but the

point here is to say that it wasn't KLA

uh and and this piece really goes on to

say like hey at some point you have to

stop dodging the Press at some point you

have to acknowledge that we hit a record

number of people arrested trying to

cross the border illegally last year 2.5

million just last year and the fact is

even if kala were to win Republicans are

likely to win the Senate so you're

probably not going to get much done

which might mean a coma candidacy could

end up if she wins in sort of a lame

duck presidency where you don't have the

power to push through large initiatives

now for many especially those in the

stock market that could actually be seen

as desirable because then you don't have

to worry about policy change stock

market kind of likes that but for voters

people want to hear what actual policy

should we be looking for and what are

the details of that now I understand K

Harris's campaign is still somewhat

young but let's be real when you're

looking at her campaign being let's say

35 days old and we've got like 90 days

or less to go to the election then what

you're really talking about is having

burned 25% of the comma Harris campaign

time not discussing details of

policy that's

scary so we do have a debate coming up

on September 10th which is the day after

the Apple event on uh September 9th

obviously I mean I'll be covering these

live as much as I can apple likes to

take down those sort of event coverage

videos so I might have to cover it

afterwards but yeah we're only 70 days

away from the election right now which

is crazy which means if we actually

spent 35 days let's say not talking

policy 35 out of 105 from cell Harris

puts this at 33% exactly 1third of the

time that she had to campaign she has

not gone into policy details so then it

just turns into okay I guess we're going

to go into the election with a

personality and a smile and hope and

optimism versus actual policy and I

guess it's going be a vote for Trump or

not Trump which is mind-blowing to me

because Americans should be voting on

policy anyway like I said if you need

life insurance go to make kevin.com

lifee thank you so much for watching and

we'll see you in the next one goodbye

and come on adver these things that you

told us here I feel like nobody else

knows about this we'll we'll try a

little advertising and see how it goes

congratulations man you have done so

much people love you people look up to

you Kevin PA there financial analyst and

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

your

take even though I'm a licensed

financial adviser licensed real estate

broker and becoming a stock broker this

video is not personalized advice for you

it is not tax legal or otherwise

personalized advice tailored to you this

video provides generalized perspective

information and commentary any third

party content I show shall not be deemed

endorsed by me this video is not and

shall never be deemed reasonably

sufficient information for the purposes

of evaluating a security or investment

decision any links or promoted products

are either paid affiliations or products

or Services we may benefit from I also

personally operate and actively managed

ET F I may personally hold or otherwise

hold long or short positions in various

Securities potentially including those

mentioned in this video however I have

no relationship to any issuer other than

house Haack nor am I presently acting as

a market maker make sure if you're

considering investing in house Haack to

always read the PPM at house.com