Critical Fed Indicator JUST Flipped & China's Coming DISASTER for Inflation.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
the bond market is pricing in a federal
reserve a U-turn and some massive new
catalysts have just occurred including
what just happened to the two-year
treasury yield what is China's inflation
going to look like how large is China's
inflation going to be relative to what
we saw in the United States we have
answers to exactly that in this video
we'll also talk about China's population
problems and we'll talk about the issue
the Federal Reserve faces but the
potential good news we have about Supply
chains combined with some bad news on
CPI a lot to cover in this video let's
get started right after reminding you
January 30th is around the corner make
sure to use that last coupon code ever
where you're moving away from the
couponing strategy check that out you'll
get the best price guaranteed
for sure for at least the next three
months if not even longer so consider
those programs on building your wealth
link down below lowest entry place is
close to 300 bucks so it's not actually
that much check it out we'll see you
soon right now markets are pricing in a
38.6 chance of
a pause yeah a
38.6 chance that on February 1st the
Federal Reserve ends up pausing that is
in contrast to a 61.4 percent chance
that the Federal Reserve hikes rates
0.25 with no probabilities assigned to a
50 basis point hike none at all and this
is really the bond market once again
telling us the FED is being too
aggressive it's time to dial back
expectations on the FED there was
actually uh well we can actually look at
uh what what Futures are indicating the
Wall Street or the financial times
rather did a great piece on this uh
Financial Times here just reported that
the Futures Market indicates that the
FED won't even make it to five percent
instead not only won't they make it to
five percent they'll probably cap out at
about 4.75 percent but
by the end of the year according to the
financial times the Futures Market is
pricing in at least a half percent of
cuts and by the end of 2024 the FED
funds rate will fall down to 2.8 and
when you look at the depth of the
inversion of the yield curve
historically we are pricing in that by
the time the FED is done cutting rates
we will be right back at zero now the
FED might not be done cutting rates
unless something massively breaks until
potentially 2026 which means we could
really be going through 24 25 26 we
could be going through three years of
rate Cuts unless they break something
and are forced to drive down uh rates
lower but I expect that they'll slowly
trickle down rates and that's exactly
what the bond market is expecting as
well of course you do have individuals
like Michael burry who say that well yes
we might see even a half a negative half
percent of deflationary figures in CPI
this year which could actually end up
leading the Federal Reserve to cut rates
this year as the bond market is pricing
in but don't get too excited we'll end
up with a second wave of inflation says
Michael burry and that'll end up leading
the FED to have to raise rates again
just like they did after the 70s level
of inflation were they lowered rates and
then ended up popping back up to uh to
have to raise rates again in the early
80s but this time because they had
broken inflation expectations they had
to raise rates more aggressively now I
somewhat dispute this mostly well
partially because of Hope but also
because uh the quote this time is
different oh gosh neither of those
actually sound like good reasons no 70s
inflation was substantially different
from the inflation that we face today no
matter how you slice them we had just
left the gold standard uh in the early
70s and we just ended up removing price
caps from the administrations of the
late 60s and early 70s that led prices
to initially soar around conveniently
the same time as we had left the gold
standard which led to this belief that
oh we're about to turn into the Weimar
Republic and there was no precedent for
the FED actually ever being able to
control inflation
on a Fiat currency because it had never
been done before in America in fact the
only history we had to look at in the
70s was that every single currency that
has ever existed has failed so of course
inflation expectations uh were at least
somewhat unanchored in the 70s we don't
have that problem today now it's
possible that problem could come back
but it appears that whether you look at
consumers or you look at the bond market
the belief is that inflation should
continue to Trend down now we do have
five-year break-even inflation rates
which are somewhat volatile they're
sitting at about 2.29 right now they
were as low as 2.19 a week ago I was
hoping that downtrend would continue
because I personally think inflation
Break Even expectations on the five-year
need to go down to something like 1.5
1.6 before the FED actually Cuts however
we're well off the 3.6 where we have
been previously and we're on a straight
downtrend despite the sort of daily
volatility that we get on the five-year
break even going back though to the
financial times we can see that the
financial times argues that one year U.S
inflation swaps are only pricing at 1.7
seven percent that's the lowest level in
more than two years and the one year
Break Even inflation rate stands at two
percent potentially indicating that
inflation might be down as low as two
percent by the end of next or at the end
of this year and so the market as they
say genuinely believes that inflation
will come down more quickly than the
Federal Reserve actually expects it to
now uh of course the Federal Reserve
says hey we don't want to repeat the
mistakes of the 70s or the 80s so as
Christopher Waller says quote we do not
want to be head faked inflation is not
just going to miraculously melt away
it's going to be a slower harder slog to
get inflation down and therefore we have
to keep rates higher for longer and not
start cutting rates by the end of the
year this stands in large contrast to
the market so now how is it possible
that the market could be pricing in Ray
cuts when you have individuals at the
Federal Reserve saying we're not going
to cut by the end of the year well this
is possible because the Federal Reserve
is between a rock and a hard place as
soon as they say or in any way indicate
or suggest that they are actually
agreeing with the market that they might
cut rates by the end of the year which
even if they say they won't right now
they still can right they have the right
to change their mind just like you and I
have the opportunity to flip-flop so
as soon as the fed and this is The Rock
and Hard Play situation the FED
obviously now in control of driving the
ship towards inflation plummeting but as
soon as the Federal Reserve suggests
sure yeah you know maybe maybe we'll cut
rates by the end of the year I expect
that they would set off one of the
largest not only stock market rallies
but they would actually end up setting
off a rally in the bond market now this
is important if bond prices rally up
because all of a sudden people say
that's it inflation's done let's take
our cash throw it into bonds what
happens is bond yields go down and when
bond yields go down because prices of
bonds are going up what ends up
happening well you end up doing what's
known as loosening Financial conditions
a lot of interest rates are tied to
interest rates in the bond market so
that could be credit card rates mortgage
rates uh it could be rates on a car a
boat a plane it could be a margin line
of credit for a company or a wholesale
line of credit all of these rates coming
down would loosen the stress on
businesses and people which is great for
us but actually runs counter to the
federal reserve's goals and all of that
could be set off in motion simply by the
FED yapping and this is why markets have
kind of started to look at the fed and
say uh
whatever you say fed we get it we see
you we hear you we see you
but we're over it
now of course there are absolutely still
real risks what are those real risks are
the fact that jobs and wage data have to
convincingly come in low essentially uh
no this isn't to say we don't want
individuals to start making more money
but it is to say that when that
employment cost index comes out for Q4
on January 31st we need to see that
we're not introducing any kind of wage
price spiral because that is not only
likely to lead to entrenched inflation
but it is likely to break inflation
expectations now one of the most
reliable indicators for the Federal
Reserve cutting rates is actually
fascinating and it has to do with this
thing called the two-year treasury bond
in relation to the fomc rate
now watch this this is crazy
so what you want to see here is that in
2004 the two-year treasury fell below uh
this is probably closer to 2005 actually
2005 the two-year treasury fell below
the federal reserve's fomc rate you
could see the two-year treasury actually
led the federal reserve's rates up see
that here how this blue line that's the
two-year treasury see how it's more
lumpy because it moves with the stock
market that two-year rate actually led
the federal reserve's rates up and it's
important to remember that the Federal
Reserve frequently follows what the bond
market tells it to do so even though
there's fluctuation once it became clear
that we potentially had hit AP care the
Federal Reserve happened to hold on
rates and they held without the two-year
ever breaking the fomc line again
and as the two-year treasury fell so did
all of a sudden rate Cuts start coming
now of course we fell into a recession
in 2007 8 and 9. but there was another
instance as well where if we look at
over here 2018 we could actually see
again the two-year lifting off over here
before the federal reserve's liftoff
two-year Peaks out above the Fed fomc
rate breaks on the hold and then what
the two years starts falling and sure
enough the FED starts cutting now what's
remarkable about this is if we pop up
over here look at what just happened we
we have literally had the two-year lead
the Fed Up and Away Up and Away there
has not been a crossover of the two-year
and the Fed fomc rate what just happened
the bond market did it again it said
rates are coming or rate cuts are coming
now it's not to say we're not doing this
right before recession in fact honestly
we're probably already in the recession
uh in fact if we look at last year we
already had a quote-unquote technical
recession two quarters in a row of
negative GDP unless of course somehow
that magically gets revised away or we
just had a really long and shallow
recession honestly I I don't really care
I am treating this situation as if we
are in a recession and in my opinion
that means increasing frugality
decreasing debt and working harder to
ensure that you could maximize your
income that is important in these sorts
of times but these Cuts or or I should
say this sort of dropping in the
two-year treasury it in my opinion is
one of the most reliable indicators that
we have suggesting that the FED is
trending towards this idea of flipping
and having to cut now another thing
that's pretty weird and and this is
another thing that sort of suggests If
the Fed keeps going here they might end
up breaking something you have this
Federal Reserve facility called the
federal repo facility and the repo
facility is supposed to be a temporary
place where
people well I should say money markets
not people but money markets Banks
institutions can park money overnight
and they can receive a yield on this
roughly equal to what the federal the
the fed's real uh uh federal funds rate
is now that Federal Reserve repo
facility has exploded in use since about
March of 2021 and there were some
changes here in liquidity and reserve
requirements at banks that actually
occurred on March 31st which perfectly
coincides with all of a sudden when
Banks started using the reverse repo
facility Well now we're sitting
somewhere at about two trillion dollars
of money sitting over here now there are
some problems with this uh and we're
gonna hop on over here to a financial
times piece where uh they make this
observation they make the observation
that investors are stashing an average
of 2.2 trillion dollars away at the
reverse repo facility and you might ask
yourself okay well you know why does
that matter well the reason it matters
is simple
instead of Institutions buying treasury
Bonds in a time of quantitative
tightening which remember if they buy
bonds that would increase prices in
somewhat lower yields but then it would
let the FED kind of dump more bonds
right so it lets them roll off bonds
that lets markets absorb those bonds
rather than that happening what's
actually happening is the Fed is
quantitatively tightening
but people aren't buying treasuries to
offset that when I say people I mean
institutions instead they're parking
their money into the overnight repo
facility because think about it if you
could earn 3.75 basis points in the repo
facility and you have zero risk it's
literally deemed risk free and not only
is it a risk-free investment but there
is no Market volatility right even
treasury bonds are considered risk
risk-free but you have Market volatility
not only do you have uh no Market
volatility in the repo facility but you
are risk-free so you have the benefits
that treasury bonds don't have which
have Market risk the FED repo facility
doesn't so institutions are like well
gosh okay we'll just park our money over
in the repo facility to some degree this
leads to a massive liquidity crunch in
the bond market and this is the one
place where investors suggest if this
continues we could end up seeing
something break in markets which ends up
leading to some kind of Black Swan
Catalyst where the FED has to swoop in
and bail out markets
basically support the the uh fiscal
Plumbing uh or the the uh the financial
system so to speak much like the bank of
England did and then that then either
ushers in back the normal era of
quantitative easing or or we potentially
reignite inflation by doing so and then
we end up proving Michael burry right so
there's some risks to that especially
since there are still other risks to
inflation that we need to consider uh
consider that um when we had uh the
earnings call for Procter Gamble which I
covered last week one of the things that
made me nervous about it was
oopsies we actually started seeing signs
of inflation still running hot for
Procter and Gamble now personally I
think there's a little bit of a risk
that Procter Gamble just didn't hedge
appropriately because they they said
they didn't or they had contracts roll
over from 2021 into 2022 so I'm treating
them right now as a little bit of an
outlier but they are an outlier that
says hey we're still dealing with
inflationary pressures I'm hoping that's
just their excuse for well basically
having bad earnings now Barclays had a
great piece on the market in the economy
and the fed and out of the piece one of
the most important parts for me was the
risk that CPI actually doesn't come down
now that's probably the biggest thing
we're not pricing in see we are pricing
in already that the housing sector is
going to roll over that's already priced
in to some extent into why we're seeing
the stock market go green right we
believe
that inflation is going to plummet
and there are a lot of spammers in the
Facebook comments on my live stream here
okay Can't Ban uh interesting for some
reason I can't ban them either well
ignore the losers who are chatting in
the chat there's no way I can chat while
doing this
uh that is impersonating me everybody
else chatting I respect but anyway
continuing on the big risk is that we
end up seeing uh in inflation from from
CPI shelter not end up showing up or we
end up seeing finance and this is why
the FED has to be tough right imagine
the FED loosens Financial conditions
much like I talked about and then all of
a sudden real estate starts going up
again and rents start going up again
well what do you have in a situation
like that a crisis you have a really bad
situation because the hope that we have
that inflation is going to plummet is
that and CPI is going to fall due to
housing and new and used vehicles which
I think it's I think we can all agree
that new and used vehicles are probably
going to continue their plummet
but if Financial conditions shift and we
start supporting shelter inflation going
up again that would be bad and I almost
guarantee you I would put money on it I
should say that one of the discussions
uh that uh that Jerome Powell is having
with his uh board essentially is the
idea that hey look if we end up
talking this market up and we end up
saying that all is good inflation is
coming down then you are going to break
any hope that inflation will come down
via uh shelter the anchor of inflation
uh through shelter that's a big deal so
uh these are critical things that we
want to pay attention to now on top of
this what I think is also really
interesting is uh the what the Eurozone
is doing but also what we've got going
on with China so we've got to talk about
these things too so let's take a brief
moment and uh look at the Eurozone so uh
in the Eurozone we uh we just had this
uh piece that was put out by zabin
zabina uh she is actually a board member
uh of the ECB the European Central Bank
this is a piece that she wrote in the uh
oh no I'm sorry she's an executive board
member of Deutsche uh the Deutsche
bundespunk okay not the ECB uh either
way she wrote a piece of in the
financial times basically talking about
how in the past they had to cut or they
had to have low rates uh to essentially
support what was too low inflation and
today they have to do the opposite right
that's that's where she starts fine not
a big deal but what we want to look at
is she says over here
this is very much what I've been talking
about as potentially that risk for the
United States look at that just listen
to this piece right here the
consequences of the significant Market
footprint resulting from our purchase
programs roughly 40 percent of public
debt is in the hands of the Eurozone
system and those issues are increasingly
visible collateral scarcity and markets
for German bonds is a significant
Distortion okay let me now try to say
this in English uh because uh you know
I'm not uh that would that is a mouthful
so
in English as we have less volatility or
as we have less liquidity in the bond
market we increase the odds of breaking
something both in Europe and the United
States much like what we saw in England
and this is a member of the Deutsche
bundespan telling you that we are seeing
the same problems that England saw to
some degree to a lesser extent obviously
and as the U.S faces in our bond market
and this is a problem because at some
point in the future we might have to
step in and start buying bonds again
right now the European
Banks RS or the European Central Bank is
expected to start
quantitative tightening by essentially
rolling off bonds much like the United
States is doing but that is going to
again reduce liquidity so
hopefully hopefully investors like you
and me by bonds is what they're saying
so they don't end up breaking something
but that breaking something is probably
the one swan uh or should I say Black
Swan that that everyone is concerned
about uh so we'll have to pay attention
to this dearly so all right let's
continue on so that's the uh that's the
European situation reiterating what we
have here the other issue is China and
this is this is another big one uh that
we have to pay attention to and this is
the reopening inflation concern remember
we basically went from zero covid to
full covid
China's economy as a result grew at its
second slowest Pace since 19 and since
the 1970s though GDP didn't come in as
badly as expected it came in at three
percent for 2022 instead of the 2.7
expected uh joblessness down to 5.5
percent retail sales actually beat
beating three months of disappointments
but China's population is starting to
shrink leading to longer term concerns
that China is going to slow down it's
the first time in 60 years that we've
seen China's population shrink
and we actually had 850 000 fewer people
alive in China than we did at the end of
2021.
we also only had
9.56 million babies born in 2022. that's
the lowest level of babies born since
1950 and this is in part uh well uh the
population decline is in part because of
low numbers of babies born but also
people leaving China 10.4 million
individuals died but remember we had a
population decline of uh of of one point
uh we had a population decline of 850
000 the uh difference between deaths and
babies born oh that actually is
somewhere close to that uh let's see
here let's do that number really quick
that's 10 point 10.41 minus 9.56 oh
that's about yeah okay that that
actually aligns with the 850 000. okay
in my opinion
people people dying doesn't fully
account for the difference in the
population in China I think there's a
higher likelihood there's also some
amount of individuals who are leaving
China and moving to different areas I
don't think China wants to send that
signal so it's unlikely that we're going
to see that sort of data come out of
China it's actually surprising that they
even give us negative data sometimes but
uh I wouldn't be surprised if there is a
larger decline actually happening than
we expect but anyway they are suggesting
it solely because less babies were born
compared to uh how many individuals died
uh now that gives you a little bit of
background on sort of the longer term
potential lid on China's growth uh
although China is doing better than
expected now and Bloomberg actually had
a great piece analyzing the potential
impact of China's reopening and this in
my opinion is probably one of the most
important pieces and the estimate is
that China's reopening could essentially
come with a 750 or 720 yeah 720 billion
dollar inflation bomb now I think this
is interesting because nimura Holdings
indicated that the Chinese households
have built up about 720 billion dollars
now 720 billion dollars in savings is
about one-third of what the United
States built up of about 2 trillion in
excess savings and part of that is
because China didn't offer stimulus
payments to people instead they offered
money to corporations to keep people
employed so they actually which is real
really wild I mean think about that for
a moment just take like a brief pause
and think about that for a moment
China
a socialist
company or socialist country
provided money to businesses to keep
people employed
whereas the United States under a
capitalist structure
gave money to
everyone it's just interesting uh which
seems more socialistic right anyway so
the the numbers are fascinating though
the potential that the Chinese
individuals
have themselves saved up 720
billion dollars
does potentially send the signal that
yes maybe we could see an inflationary
surge or at least some kind of pressure
from China now personally and this is my
opinion I actually believe that most
Supply chains today
have built themselves up to make sure a
2021 shortage never happens again people
and businesses are frustrated that they
did not have the supply to fulfill
demand the worst feeling is when you're
in business
but you can't fulfill all the orders
you're getting it's the worst feeling
ever it makes CEOs look like clowns and
it pisses people off especially
investors and so I think that a lot of
companies and this is what we're seeing
with companies like Taiwan
semiconductors
I think these companies are setting up
massive spare capacity to where right
now we're kind of like like if this is a
normal rubber band we're kind of like a
crumpled up rubber band right now we're
just waiting for some more demand to
start coming because we're in a
recessionary environment whereas in 2021
the rubber band looked like this it was
almost stretched to the extreme and and
some would argue it snapped right so if
the rubber band represents capacity I
think we're scrunchy right now which is
good because that means if we reopen you
could kind of scrunchie to normal and I
hope that the Chinese uh you know
reopening doesn't create the sort of
inflationary uh disaster that we've uh
that would that we saw in 2021 now uh I
made a little note here that I think the
Omega surge of Chinese pent-up demand
will actually end up being very good for
byd and Tesla I I believe this because I
think after three years of lockdowns
people are going to want a car uh now
the byd uh there are some really great
videos on the auto three uh in the
United Kingdom that was just released
from byd their full self-driving is
actually non-existent now to the extent
that you think that matters for vehicle
developers I think it's quite
fascinating but they essentially have
adaptive cruise control and Lane
centering but I think Honda's had that
for like three years now so I personally
don't find that very impressive however
they are less expensive Vehicles than
Teslas so while Tesla does have that
technology Edge I'm not sure yet that
people might want to pay that sort of
money uh for a Tesla versus a byd and so
you're probably still competing in two
different markets I do think it's very
interesting though and I've been saying
this for over a year uh that I think the
Chinese are very very Smart in that they
ramped up their precautionary savings
because the government wasn't going to
come do that for them
and this here shows you the potential
net increase in China's household
savings deposits I here wrote a wow on
that because I think it's actually very
impressive that they pulled this off
without the help of the government
I don't think we would have seen that
happen here we would have seen a lot
more defaults and foreclosures but then
again you know we don't have the kind of
punishments for for not paying back your
debts as China does uh and so we'll see
if commodity prices and oil and uh
Supply chains end up inflating like they
did here in 2021 again I don't think so
so I think the rise in oil uh prices
right now is a little bit more of a
trading move do keep in mind that the
substantial movements that we've seen
away from for example growth Innovation
and Technology uh certainly profitless
attack but getting away from profitless
Attack makes sense in a recession I
think a substantial portion of this uh a
rise in oil that we've seen recently
which is still nominal it's just a
tactical trade it's hey it's logical to
sell the idea that China is going to
cause a re-inflationary boom let's go
long oil and then talk up how much of an
inflationary boom there's going to be in
China personally not the biggest
believer of that so this gives us a
little bit of insight into The Fad where
rates are going uh Commodities risks but
also other risks that we Face to
inflation
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.