TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Critical Fed Indicator JUST Flipped & China's Coming DISASTER for Inflation.

30m 48s4,970 words724 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

the bond market is pricing in a federal

0:01

reserve a U-turn and some massive new

0:04

catalysts have just occurred including

0:07

what just happened to the two-year

0:08

treasury yield what is China's inflation

0:11

going to look like how large is China's

0:14

inflation going to be relative to what

0:17

we saw in the United States we have

0:18

answers to exactly that in this video

0:21

we'll also talk about China's population

0:22

problems and we'll talk about the issue

0:24

the Federal Reserve faces but the

0:27

potential good news we have about Supply

0:29

chains combined with some bad news on

0:33

CPI a lot to cover in this video let's

0:35

get started right after reminding you

0:36

January 30th is around the corner make

0:39

sure to use that last coupon code ever

0:41

where you're moving away from the

0:42

couponing strategy check that out you'll

0:45

get the best price guaranteed

0:47

for sure for at least the next three

0:49

months if not even longer so consider

0:52

those programs on building your wealth

0:54

link down below lowest entry place is

0:56

close to 300 bucks so it's not actually

0:58

that much check it out we'll see you

1:00

soon right now markets are pricing in a

1:03

38.6 chance of

1:06

a pause yeah a

1:09

38.6 chance that on February 1st the

1:14

Federal Reserve ends up pausing that is

1:17

in contrast to a 61.4 percent chance

1:20

that the Federal Reserve hikes rates

1:23

0.25 with no probabilities assigned to a

1:29

50 basis point hike none at all and this

1:33

is really the bond market once again

1:35

telling us the FED is being too

1:38

aggressive it's time to dial back

1:40

expectations on the FED there was

1:42

actually uh well we can actually look at

1:44

uh what what Futures are indicating the

1:46

Wall Street or the financial times

1:48

rather did a great piece on this uh

1:50

Financial Times here just reported that

1:53

the Futures Market indicates that the

1:56

FED won't even make it to five percent

1:59

instead not only won't they make it to

2:02

five percent they'll probably cap out at

2:03

about 4.75 percent but

2:07

by the end of the year according to the

2:10

financial times the Futures Market is

2:12

pricing in at least a half percent of

2:15

cuts and by the end of 2024 the FED

2:19

funds rate will fall down to 2.8 and

2:23

when you look at the depth of the

2:24

inversion of the yield curve

2:26

historically we are pricing in that by

2:30

the time the FED is done cutting rates

2:32

we will be right back at zero now the

2:35

FED might not be done cutting rates

2:37

unless something massively breaks until

2:39

potentially 2026 which means we could

2:42

really be going through 24 25 26 we

2:46

could be going through three years of

2:47

rate Cuts unless they break something

2:49

and are forced to drive down uh rates

2:51

lower but I expect that they'll slowly

2:54

trickle down rates and that's exactly

2:56

what the bond market is expecting as

2:57

well of course you do have individuals

2:59

like Michael burry who say that well yes

3:03

we might see even a half a negative half

3:06

percent of deflationary figures in CPI

3:10

this year which could actually end up

3:12

leading the Federal Reserve to cut rates

3:14

this year as the bond market is pricing

3:16

in but don't get too excited we'll end

3:19

up with a second wave of inflation says

3:22

Michael burry and that'll end up leading

3:24

the FED to have to raise rates again

3:26

just like they did after the 70s level

3:29

of inflation were they lowered rates and

3:31

then ended up popping back up to uh to

3:34

have to raise rates again in the early

3:35

80s but this time because they had

3:37

broken inflation expectations they had

3:39

to raise rates more aggressively now I

3:42

somewhat dispute this mostly well

3:45

partially because of Hope but also

3:47

because uh the quote this time is

3:49

different oh gosh neither of those

3:50

actually sound like good reasons no 70s

3:53

inflation was substantially different

3:55

from the inflation that we face today no

3:58

matter how you slice them we had just

4:00

left the gold standard uh in the early

4:03

70s and we just ended up removing price

4:07

caps from the administrations of the

4:10

late 60s and early 70s that led prices

4:13

to initially soar around conveniently

4:17

the same time as we had left the gold

4:20

standard which led to this belief that

4:22

oh we're about to turn into the Weimar

4:24

Republic and there was no precedent for

4:27

the FED actually ever being able to

4:29

control inflation

4:31

on a Fiat currency because it had never

4:34

been done before in America in fact the

4:37

only history we had to look at in the

4:39

70s was that every single currency that

4:42

has ever existed has failed so of course

4:46

inflation expectations uh were at least

4:48

somewhat unanchored in the 70s we don't

4:52

have that problem today now it's

4:54

possible that problem could come back

4:56

but it appears that whether you look at

4:58

consumers or you look at the bond market

5:00

the belief is that inflation should

5:02

continue to Trend down now we do have

5:05

five-year break-even inflation rates

5:07

which are somewhat volatile they're

5:08

sitting at about 2.29 right now they

5:11

were as low as 2.19 a week ago I was

5:14

hoping that downtrend would continue

5:15

because I personally think inflation

5:17

Break Even expectations on the five-year

5:19

need to go down to something like 1.5

5:22

1.6 before the FED actually Cuts however

5:25

we're well off the 3.6 where we have

5:28

been previously and we're on a straight

5:31

downtrend despite the sort of daily

5:33

volatility that we get on the five-year

5:34

break even going back though to the

5:36

financial times we can see that the

5:38

financial times argues that one year U.S

5:40

inflation swaps are only pricing at 1.7

5:44

seven percent that's the lowest level in

5:47

more than two years and the one year

5:50

Break Even inflation rate stands at two

5:52

percent potentially indicating that

5:54

inflation might be down as low as two

5:57

percent by the end of next or at the end

5:59

of this year and so the market as they

6:02

say genuinely believes that inflation

6:04

will come down more quickly than the

6:07

Federal Reserve actually expects it to

6:09

now uh of course the Federal Reserve

6:12

says hey we don't want to repeat the

6:15

mistakes of the 70s or the 80s so as

6:19

Christopher Waller says quote we do not

6:22

want to be head faked inflation is not

6:25

just going to miraculously melt away

6:28

it's going to be a slower harder slog to

6:31

get inflation down and therefore we have

6:33

to keep rates higher for longer and not

6:35

start cutting rates by the end of the

6:37

year this stands in large contrast to

6:39

the market so now how is it possible

6:42

that the market could be pricing in Ray

6:44

cuts when you have individuals at the

6:47

Federal Reserve saying we're not going

6:49

to cut by the end of the year well this

6:51

is possible because the Federal Reserve

6:54

is between a rock and a hard place as

6:57

soon as they say or in any way indicate

7:00

or suggest that they are actually

7:02

agreeing with the market that they might

7:05

cut rates by the end of the year which

7:07

even if they say they won't right now

7:08

they still can right they have the right

7:10

to change their mind just like you and I

7:12

have the opportunity to flip-flop so

7:16

as soon as the fed and this is The Rock

7:19

and Hard Play situation the FED

7:20

obviously now in control of driving the

7:24

ship towards inflation plummeting but as

7:26

soon as the Federal Reserve suggests

7:28

sure yeah you know maybe maybe we'll cut

7:30

rates by the end of the year I expect

7:32

that they would set off one of the

7:34

largest not only stock market rallies

7:36

but they would actually end up setting

7:39

off a rally in the bond market now this

7:42

is important if bond prices rally up

7:46

because all of a sudden people say

7:47

that's it inflation's done let's take

7:50

our cash throw it into bonds what

7:52

happens is bond yields go down and when

7:56

bond yields go down because prices of

7:58

bonds are going up what ends up

8:00

happening well you end up doing what's

8:02

known as loosening Financial conditions

8:05

a lot of interest rates are tied to

8:08

interest rates in the bond market so

8:11

that could be credit card rates mortgage

8:13

rates uh it could be rates on a car a

8:15

boat a plane it could be a margin line

8:18

of credit for a company or a wholesale

8:20

line of credit all of these rates coming

8:22

down would loosen the stress on

8:24

businesses and people which is great for

8:27

us but actually runs counter to the

8:29

federal reserve's goals and all of that

8:32

could be set off in motion simply by the

8:35

FED yapping and this is why markets have

8:38

kind of started to look at the fed and

8:39

say uh

8:41

whatever you say fed we get it we see

8:43

you we hear you we see you

8:46

but we're over it

8:48

now of course there are absolutely still

8:51

real risks what are those real risks are

8:54

the fact that jobs and wage data have to

8:57

convincingly come in low essentially uh

9:02

no this isn't to say we don't want

9:04

individuals to start making more money

9:06

but it is to say that when that

9:07

employment cost index comes out for Q4

9:10

on January 31st we need to see that

9:13

we're not introducing any kind of wage

9:15

price spiral because that is not only

9:17

likely to lead to entrenched inflation

9:20

but it is likely to break inflation

9:22

expectations now one of the most

9:25

reliable indicators for the Federal

9:27

Reserve cutting rates is actually

9:30

fascinating and it has to do with this

9:33

thing called the two-year treasury bond

9:38

in relation to the fomc rate

9:42

now watch this this is crazy

9:45

so what you want to see here is that in

9:48

2004 the two-year treasury fell below uh

9:55

this is probably closer to 2005 actually

9:57

2005 the two-year treasury fell below

10:00

the federal reserve's fomc rate you

10:03

could see the two-year treasury actually

10:06

led the federal reserve's rates up see

10:09

that here how this blue line that's the

10:11

two-year treasury see how it's more

10:13

lumpy because it moves with the stock

10:15

market that two-year rate actually led

10:18

the federal reserve's rates up and it's

10:22

important to remember that the Federal

10:23

Reserve frequently follows what the bond

10:26

market tells it to do so even though

10:29

there's fluctuation once it became clear

10:31

that we potentially had hit AP care the

10:34

Federal Reserve happened to hold on

10:37

rates and they held without the two-year

10:41

ever breaking the fomc line again

10:44

and as the two-year treasury fell so did

10:48

all of a sudden rate Cuts start coming

10:50

now of course we fell into a recession

10:52

in 2007 8 and 9. but there was another

10:57

instance as well where if we look at

10:59

over here 2018 we could actually see

11:03

again the two-year lifting off over here

11:06

before the federal reserve's liftoff

11:09

two-year Peaks out above the Fed fomc

11:12

rate breaks on the hold and then what

11:16

the two years starts falling and sure

11:18

enough the FED starts cutting now what's

11:22

remarkable about this is if we pop up

11:25

over here look at what just happened we

11:28

we have literally had the two-year lead

11:32

the Fed Up and Away Up and Away there

11:36

has not been a crossover of the two-year

11:39

and the Fed fomc rate what just happened

11:43

the bond market did it again it said

11:46

rates are coming or rate cuts are coming

11:48

now it's not to say we're not doing this

11:51

right before recession in fact honestly

11:53

we're probably already in the recession

11:55

uh in fact if we look at last year we

11:58

already had a quote-unquote technical

12:00

recession two quarters in a row of

12:02

negative GDP unless of course somehow

12:03

that magically gets revised away or we

12:06

just had a really long and shallow

12:07

recession honestly I I don't really care

12:10

I am treating this situation as if we

12:13

are in a recession and in my opinion

12:15

that means increasing frugality

12:16

decreasing debt and working harder to

12:19

ensure that you could maximize your

12:20

income that is important in these sorts

12:23

of times but these Cuts or or I should

12:26

say this sort of dropping in the

12:27

two-year treasury it in my opinion is

12:30

one of the most reliable indicators that

12:33

we have suggesting that the FED is

12:36

trending towards this idea of flipping

12:40

and having to cut now another thing

12:43

that's pretty weird and and this is

12:46

another thing that sort of suggests If

12:48

the Fed keeps going here they might end

12:50

up breaking something you have this

12:53

Federal Reserve facility called the

12:56

federal repo facility and the repo

12:59

facility is supposed to be a temporary

13:01

place where

13:04

people well I should say money markets

13:06

not people but money markets Banks

13:09

institutions can park money overnight

13:12

and they can receive a yield on this

13:15

roughly equal to what the federal the

13:17

the fed's real uh uh federal funds rate

13:20

is now that Federal Reserve repo

13:23

facility has exploded in use since about

13:26

March of 2021 and there were some

13:29

changes here in liquidity and reserve

13:31

requirements at banks that actually

13:33

occurred on March 31st which perfectly

13:36

coincides with all of a sudden when

13:37

Banks started using the reverse repo

13:39

facility Well now we're sitting

13:41

somewhere at about two trillion dollars

13:43

of money sitting over here now there are

13:45

some problems with this uh and we're

13:48

gonna hop on over here to a financial

13:51

times piece where uh they make this

13:54

observation they make the observation

13:55

that investors are stashing an average

13:58

of 2.2 trillion dollars away at the

14:02

reverse repo facility and you might ask

14:04

yourself okay well you know why does

14:07

that matter well the reason it matters

14:09

is simple

14:11

instead of Institutions buying treasury

14:15

Bonds in a time of quantitative

14:17

tightening which remember if they buy

14:19

bonds that would increase prices in

14:21

somewhat lower yields but then it would

14:23

let the FED kind of dump more bonds

14:26

right so it lets them roll off bonds

14:28

that lets markets absorb those bonds

14:30

rather than that happening what's

14:33

actually happening is the Fed is

14:35

quantitatively tightening

14:37

but people aren't buying treasuries to

14:40

offset that when I say people I mean

14:41

institutions instead they're parking

14:44

their money into the overnight repo

14:45

facility because think about it if you

14:47

could earn 3.75 basis points in the repo

14:50

facility and you have zero risk it's

14:54

literally deemed risk free and not only

14:58

is it a risk-free investment but there

15:00

is no Market volatility right even

15:02

treasury bonds are considered risk

15:04

risk-free but you have Market volatility

15:06

not only do you have uh no Market

15:10

volatility in the repo facility but you

15:13

are risk-free so you have the benefits

15:15

that treasury bonds don't have which

15:17

have Market risk the FED repo facility

15:18

doesn't so institutions are like well

15:21

gosh okay we'll just park our money over

15:23

in the repo facility to some degree this

15:27

leads to a massive liquidity crunch in

15:30

the bond market and this is the one

15:33

place where investors suggest if this

15:36

continues we could end up seeing

15:39

something break in markets which ends up

15:42

leading to some kind of Black Swan

15:44

Catalyst where the FED has to swoop in

15:47

and bail out markets

15:49

basically support the the uh fiscal

15:53

Plumbing uh or the the uh the financial

15:57

system so to speak much like the bank of

15:59

England did and then that then either

16:01

ushers in back the normal era of

16:04

quantitative easing or or we potentially

16:08

reignite inflation by doing so and then

16:11

we end up proving Michael burry right so

16:13

there's some risks to that especially

16:15

since there are still other risks to

16:18

inflation that we need to consider uh

16:20

consider that um when we had uh the

16:24

earnings call for Procter Gamble which I

16:27

covered last week one of the things that

16:28

made me nervous about it was

16:31

oopsies we actually started seeing signs

16:34

of inflation still running hot for

16:36

Procter and Gamble now personally I

16:38

think there's a little bit of a risk

16:40

that Procter Gamble just didn't hedge

16:42

appropriately because they they said

16:44

they didn't or they had contracts roll

16:47

over from 2021 into 2022 so I'm treating

16:50

them right now as a little bit of an

16:51

outlier but they are an outlier that

16:53

says hey we're still dealing with

16:55

inflationary pressures I'm hoping that's

16:57

just their excuse for well basically

17:02

having bad earnings now Barclays had a

17:05

great piece on the market in the economy

17:07

and the fed and out of the piece one of

17:09

the most important parts for me was the

17:13

risk that CPI actually doesn't come down

17:17

now that's probably the biggest thing

17:20

we're not pricing in see we are pricing

17:23

in already that the housing sector is

17:26

going to roll over that's already priced

17:29

in to some extent into why we're seeing

17:31

the stock market go green right we

17:34

believe

17:35

that inflation is going to plummet

17:39

and there are a lot of spammers in the

17:41

Facebook comments on my live stream here

17:43

okay Can't Ban uh interesting for some

17:48

reason I can't ban them either well

17:50

ignore the losers who are chatting in

17:53

the chat there's no way I can chat while

17:55

doing this

17:57

uh that is impersonating me everybody

17:59

else chatting I respect but anyway

18:01

continuing on the big risk is that we

18:05

end up seeing uh in inflation from from

18:08

CPI shelter not end up showing up or we

18:13

end up seeing finance and this is why

18:15

the FED has to be tough right imagine

18:17

the FED loosens Financial conditions

18:20

much like I talked about and then all of

18:22

a sudden real estate starts going up

18:24

again and rents start going up again

18:28

well what do you have in a situation

18:30

like that a crisis you have a really bad

18:34

situation because the hope that we have

18:36

that inflation is going to plummet is

18:38

that and CPI is going to fall due to

18:41

housing and new and used vehicles which

18:46

I think it's I think we can all agree

18:48

that new and used vehicles are probably

18:49

going to continue their plummet

18:51

but if Financial conditions shift and we

18:54

start supporting shelter inflation going

18:56

up again that would be bad and I almost

18:59

guarantee you I would put money on it I

19:01

should say that one of the discussions

19:03

uh that uh that Jerome Powell is having

19:08

with his uh board essentially is the

19:11

idea that hey look if we end up

19:15

talking this market up and we end up

19:18

saying that all is good inflation is

19:20

coming down then you are going to break

19:24

any hope that inflation will come down

19:27

via uh shelter the anchor of inflation

19:31

uh through shelter that's a big deal so

19:34

uh these are critical things that we

19:36

want to pay attention to now on top of

19:38

this what I think is also really

19:39

interesting is uh the what the Eurozone

19:42

is doing but also what we've got going

19:44

on with China so we've got to talk about

19:46

these things too so let's take a brief

19:48

moment and uh look at the Eurozone so uh

19:51

in the Eurozone we uh we just had this

19:54

uh piece that was put out by zabin

19:57

zabina uh she is actually a board member

20:01

uh of the ECB the European Central Bank

20:05

this is a piece that she wrote in the uh

20:09

oh no I'm sorry she's an executive board

20:11

member of Deutsche uh the Deutsche

20:12

bundespunk okay not the ECB uh either

20:16

way she wrote a piece of in the

20:18

financial times basically talking about

20:20

how in the past they had to cut or they

20:22

had to have low rates uh to essentially

20:26

support what was too low inflation and

20:29

today they have to do the opposite right

20:31

that's that's where she starts fine not

20:33

a big deal but what we want to look at

20:36

is she says over here

20:39

this is very much what I've been talking

20:41

about as potentially that risk for the

20:43

United States look at that just listen

20:45

to this piece right here the

20:47

consequences of the significant Market

20:49

footprint resulting from our purchase

20:51

programs roughly 40 percent of public

20:53

debt is in the hands of the Eurozone

20:55

system and those issues are increasingly

20:57

visible collateral scarcity and markets

21:00

for German bonds is a significant

21:03

Distortion okay let me now try to say

21:06

this in English uh because uh you know

21:10

I'm not uh that would that is a mouthful

21:13

so

21:15

in English as we have less volatility or

21:19

as we have less liquidity in the bond

21:21

market we increase the odds of breaking

21:24

something both in Europe and the United

21:27

States much like what we saw in England

21:30

and this is a member of the Deutsche

21:33

bundespan telling you that we are seeing

21:35

the same problems that England saw to

21:38

some degree to a lesser extent obviously

21:40

and as the U.S faces in our bond market

21:43

and this is a problem because at some

21:46

point in the future we might have to

21:47

step in and start buying bonds again

21:49

right now the European

21:52

Banks RS or the European Central Bank is

21:55

expected to start

21:57

quantitative tightening by essentially

22:00

rolling off bonds much like the United

22:03

States is doing but that is going to

22:05

again reduce liquidity so

22:09

hopefully hopefully investors like you

22:13

and me by bonds is what they're saying

22:14

so they don't end up breaking something

22:16

but that breaking something is probably

22:19

the one swan uh or should I say Black

22:22

Swan that that everyone is concerned

22:25

about uh so we'll have to pay attention

22:28

to this dearly so all right let's

22:31

continue on so that's the uh that's the

22:34

European situation reiterating what we

22:36

have here the other issue is China and

22:40

this is this is another big one uh that

22:43

we have to pay attention to and this is

22:45

the reopening inflation concern remember

22:48

we basically went from zero covid to

22:52

full covid

22:53

China's economy as a result grew at its

22:56

second slowest Pace since 19 and since

22:59

the 1970s though GDP didn't come in as

23:02

badly as expected it came in at three

23:04

percent for 2022 instead of the 2.7

23:07

expected uh joblessness down to 5.5

23:10

percent retail sales actually beat

23:13

beating three months of disappointments

23:14

but China's population is starting to

23:17

shrink leading to longer term concerns

23:20

that China is going to slow down it's

23:22

the first time in 60 years that we've

23:25

seen China's population shrink

23:27

and we actually had 850 000 fewer people

23:32

alive in China than we did at the end of

23:34

2021.

23:36

we also only had

23:39

9.56 million babies born in 2022. that's

23:44

the lowest level of babies born since

23:47

1950 and this is in part uh well uh the

23:51

population decline is in part because of

23:52

low numbers of babies born but also

23:55

people leaving China 10.4 million

23:58

individuals died but remember we had a

24:00

population decline of uh of of one point

24:03

uh we had a population decline of 850

24:07

000 the uh difference between deaths and

24:10

babies born oh that actually is

24:12

somewhere close to that uh let's see

24:14

here let's do that number really quick

24:15

that's 10 point 10.41 minus 9.56 oh

24:20

that's about yeah okay that that

24:21

actually aligns with the 850 000. okay

24:24

in my opinion

24:26

people people dying doesn't fully

24:29

account for the difference in the

24:31

population in China I think there's a

24:32

higher likelihood there's also some

24:35

amount of individuals who are leaving

24:37

China and moving to different areas I

24:39

don't think China wants to send that

24:41

signal so it's unlikely that we're going

24:43

to see that sort of data come out of

24:44

China it's actually surprising that they

24:46

even give us negative data sometimes but

24:48

uh I wouldn't be surprised if there is a

24:51

larger decline actually happening than

24:53

we expect but anyway they are suggesting

24:55

it solely because less babies were born

24:57

compared to uh how many individuals died

25:01

uh now that gives you a little bit of

25:03

background on sort of the longer term

25:05

potential lid on China's growth uh

25:07

although China is doing better than

25:09

expected now and Bloomberg actually had

25:12

a great piece analyzing the potential

25:15

impact of China's reopening and this in

25:18

my opinion is probably one of the most

25:19

important pieces and the estimate is

25:23

that China's reopening could essentially

25:25

come with a 750 or 720 yeah 720 billion

25:30

dollar inflation bomb now I think this

25:33

is interesting because nimura Holdings

25:35

indicated that the Chinese households

25:39

have built up about 720 billion dollars

25:41

now 720 billion dollars in savings is

25:45

about one-third of what the United

25:48

States built up of about 2 trillion in

25:51

excess savings and part of that is

25:53

because China didn't offer stimulus

25:55

payments to people instead they offered

25:57

money to corporations to keep people

25:59

employed so they actually which is real

26:01

really wild I mean think about that for

26:03

a moment just take like a brief pause

26:04

and think about that for a moment

26:06

China

26:07

a socialist

26:09

company or socialist country

26:12

provided money to businesses to keep

26:15

people employed

26:16

whereas the United States under a

26:20

capitalist structure

26:21

gave money to

26:23

everyone it's just interesting uh which

26:27

seems more socialistic right anyway so

26:30

the the numbers are fascinating though

26:33

the potential that the Chinese

26:35

individuals

26:37

have themselves saved up 720

26:42

billion dollars

26:43

does potentially send the signal that

26:46

yes maybe we could see an inflationary

26:48

surge or at least some kind of pressure

26:50

from China now personally and this is my

26:53

opinion I actually believe that most

26:56

Supply chains today

26:59

have built themselves up to make sure a

27:02

2021 shortage never happens again people

27:06

and businesses are frustrated that they

27:09

did not have the supply to fulfill

27:11

demand the worst feeling is when you're

27:14

in business

27:15

but you can't fulfill all the orders

27:17

you're getting it's the worst feeling

27:19

ever it makes CEOs look like clowns and

27:22

it pisses people off especially

27:24

investors and so I think that a lot of

27:27

companies and this is what we're seeing

27:28

with companies like Taiwan

27:29

semiconductors

27:31

I think these companies are setting up

27:34

massive spare capacity to where right

27:37

now we're kind of like like if this is a

27:40

normal rubber band we're kind of like a

27:43

crumpled up rubber band right now we're

27:45

just waiting for some more demand to

27:48

start coming because we're in a

27:49

recessionary environment whereas in 2021

27:52

the rubber band looked like this it was

27:54

almost stretched to the extreme and and

27:55

some would argue it snapped right so if

27:58

the rubber band represents capacity I

28:01

think we're scrunchy right now which is

28:04

good because that means if we reopen you

28:05

could kind of scrunchie to normal and I

28:08

hope that the Chinese uh you know

28:10

reopening doesn't create the sort of

28:12

inflationary uh disaster that we've uh

28:15

that would that we saw in 2021 now uh I

28:19

made a little note here that I think the

28:21

Omega surge of Chinese pent-up demand

28:22

will actually end up being very good for

28:24

byd and Tesla I I believe this because I

28:27

think after three years of lockdowns

28:28

people are going to want a car uh now

28:31

the byd uh there are some really great

28:34

videos on the auto three uh in the

28:37

United Kingdom that was just released

28:38

from byd their full self-driving is

28:42

actually non-existent now to the extent

28:44

that you think that matters for vehicle

28:46

developers I think it's quite

28:48

fascinating but they essentially have

28:49

adaptive cruise control and Lane

28:51

centering but I think Honda's had that

28:53

for like three years now so I personally

28:55

don't find that very impressive however

28:57

they are less expensive Vehicles than

28:59

Teslas so while Tesla does have that

29:01

technology Edge I'm not sure yet that

29:04

people might want to pay that sort of

29:06

money uh for a Tesla versus a byd and so

29:08

you're probably still competing in two

29:10

different markets I do think it's very

29:12

interesting though and I've been saying

29:14

this for over a year uh that I think the

29:16

Chinese are very very Smart in that they

29:18

ramped up their precautionary savings

29:20

because the government wasn't going to

29:22

come do that for them

29:23

and this here shows you the potential

29:26

net increase in China's household

29:28

savings deposits I here wrote a wow on

29:30

that because I think it's actually very

29:32

impressive that they pulled this off

29:33

without the help of the government

29:36

I don't think we would have seen that

29:37

happen here we would have seen a lot

29:38

more defaults and foreclosures but then

29:42

again you know we don't have the kind of

29:44

punishments for for not paying back your

29:47

debts as China does uh and so we'll see

29:51

if commodity prices and oil and uh

29:54

Supply chains end up inflating like they

29:57

did here in 2021 again I don't think so

29:59

so I think the rise in oil uh prices

30:03

right now is a little bit more of a

30:05

trading move do keep in mind that the

30:08

substantial movements that we've seen

30:09

away from for example growth Innovation

30:11

and Technology uh certainly profitless

30:13

attack but getting away from profitless

30:14

Attack makes sense in a recession I

30:16

think a substantial portion of this uh a

30:19

rise in oil that we've seen recently

30:21

which is still nominal it's just a

30:23

tactical trade it's hey it's logical to

30:26

sell the idea that China is going to

30:28

cause a re-inflationary boom let's go

30:30

long oil and then talk up how much of an

30:32

inflationary boom there's going to be in

30:34

China personally not the biggest

30:36

believer of that so this gives us a

30:38

little bit of insight into The Fad where

30:40

rates are going uh Commodities risks but

30:44

also other risks that we Face to

30:45

inflation

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.