⚠️ Some features may be temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing 3rd party provider issue. We apologize for the inconvenience and expect this to be resolved soon.
TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Why Stocks TANKED Today | *2 New Dangers*

11m 33s2,208 words322 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Hey everyone, me Kevin here brought to

0:01

you by Extra. Go to metkaven.com/extra

0:04

to learn more. All right folks, so

0:06

something wild happened today. We got to

0:09

talk about what James Bullard, the

0:11

president of the St. Louis Federal

0:12

Reserve, had to say today and the

0:15

potential warning sign that is starting

0:17

to brew the market. We just had an

0:19

inflection point on something very, very

0:21

important that very few folks are

0:23

talking about. So, we're going to talk

0:24

about that towards the end of the video.

0:26

But first, James Bullard, president of

0:28

the St. Louis uh Federal Reserve, a

0:30

voting member of the Federal Reserve's

0:32

open market committee. Uh that's the

0:34

body that votes on how much and when to

0:36

raise interest rates, how much and when

0:38

to offload the balance sheet. Well, this

0:40

morning in a discussion with Bloomberg

0:42

News stated that he now supports raising

0:44

interest rates by 1% by July 1st. Now,

0:48

given that the July Federal Reserve

0:49

meeting isn't until July 27th, that

0:51

actually means Bullard supports rates

0:53

going to 1%. and forget about a quarter

0:55

of a percent or half percent to 1%

0:57

within the next three meetings or

1:00

potentially even sooner. So right now

1:03

this on sort of a base case scenario

1:05

implies three successive hikes likely 50

1:08

basis points or half of a percent in

1:10

March followed by a 25 basis point

1:12

increase in May and another 25 basis

1:14

point in June. He also says that the Fed

1:17

should remove ACU accommodation for

1:19

markets as soon as possible because

1:20

right now we're actually still

1:21

stimulating and 1% rates are still

1:23

accommodated, but we are still

1:24

stimulating. We're still printing money

1:26

right now, which is just nuts.

1:28

Meanwhile, the Fed is so far behind the

1:29

curve on inflation. Companies have lost

1:31

faith and now they're raising prices

1:33

more than ever before, more than last

1:34

year, at least what we're seeing in Q1

1:36

because they have to. They're behind the

1:38

curve. The supply chain and transitory

1:40

inflations arguments aren't really

1:42

keeping up right now. So there's now

1:44

this possibility because of what Bullard

1:47

implied about maybe even an inter uh

1:51

interpolicy meeting. There is this

1:54

possibility that the Fed will call an

1:56

emergency meeting. And this is what's

1:59

really spooking the markets today. And

2:01

this is why we're seeing a lot of red in

2:02

a lot of different stocks. Even though

2:05

Bullard says he doesn't believe in the

2:07

Bill Aman shock and awe approach,

2:10

Bullard suggests that we could have an

2:12

intermediating move which basically

2:15

could mean jacking rates up

2:17

instantaneously to 1%. Now Jerome Powell

2:20

usually doesn't like doing that. So if

2:22

there's any good news here, it's that

2:23

JPOW likes steady eddy and

2:26

predictability at the Fed. This has been

2:28

his promise that they're going to

2:29

communicate more clearly. if things

2:31

change, they're going to communicate

2:32

these clearly and and well in advance.

2:34

That's always been the goal of the Fed.

2:36

But unfortunately, well in the well in

2:38

advance have left has sort of left the

2:40

Fed lagging a lot. Now, think back to

2:43

the last time the Fed did something

2:44

really unexpected. You go all the way

2:46

back to the beginning of March, the

2:48

first week of March 2020, and that's

2:50

when the Fed sent interest rates from 2%

2:52

to zero instantaneously on a Sunday.

2:56

Totally unexpected move. It is. That was

2:59

the day before I called up my lender and

3:00

I'm like, "The Fed just dropped rates to

3:02

zero. Please refinance everything before

3:05

other people go in, which was great

3:06

because then I got my money by like the

3:08

beginning uh end of March, beginning of

3:10

April, which was the perfect time to buy

3:11

the dip in March of 2020. But now times

3:14

are different. Now, you know this, I'm

3:16

not the biggest advocate right now of

3:18

buying the dip because I'm worried about

3:19

this kind of pain continuing. But let's

3:22

think about what this could mean. If the

3:24

Fed ends stimulus all of a sudden out of

3:27

nowhere and jumps interest rates in an

3:29

interparty meeting, the stock market

3:30

could be in for quite a bit of a

3:32

shocker. Now again, hopefully that does

3:34

not happen. I want to be bullish in

3:36

that, hey, we can get to that soft

3:38

landing, but I'm I am really worried

3:40

that they're just playing the violin for

3:42

us on the Titanic. And I just want to be

3:44

transparent about that. Now, we've got

3:45

to talk in addition to what we just

3:48

talked about with the Fed, we got to

3:49

talk about another dangerous warning

3:51

sign that just happened. And I hate to

3:53

sound like Dr. Fud, but I'm starting to

3:54

get to the point where I just may have

3:56

to embrace it. I'm Dr. Fud and I'm

3:58

writing you a prescription of caution.

4:01

But first, so folks, let's talk about

4:03

this other boogeyman in the room and

4:05

what the market is doing right now. So

4:07

yesterday, the market had priced in only

4:09

a 24% probability of a 50 basis point

4:12

rate hike. Today, following Bullard's

4:14

craze and this terrible inflation uh

4:17

report that we got this morning, the

4:18

market is now pricing in a 99.6% 6%

4:21

chance of a 50% or a 50 basis point hike

4:25

uh in March. They're pricing in a 100%

4:27

of a probability that we'll hit 1% by

4:29

June. Now, Bullard is a hawk, so maybe

4:32

they're getting a little ahead of

4:33

themselves and maybe that means we'll

4:34

have some green ahead because again,

4:37

Bullard is a hawk. Uh he's not as dovish

4:39

as some of the others who have come out

4:41

uh like Marie Daly who tends to say,

4:43

"Hey, you know, maybe we'll only need

4:44

two rate hikes. Maybe it'll all be okay

4:46

and we'll have that soft landing." Uh

4:48

but the market's pricing this in. We're

4:49

seeing the red and there's another

4:51

boogeyman that we have got to talk about

4:53

and this has to know has to do rather

4:55

with the wage price spiral. This is when

4:58

the price of goods and services rise and

5:01

workers end up demanding more money. As

5:03

long as workers have pricing power,

5:04

their real wages tend to rise. That's a

5:07

really interesting note. Think about

5:08

that. If workers have pricing power,

5:11

real wages go up. So, we can now study

5:13

the inverse. If real wages are going up,

5:17

that means workers have pricing power,

5:19

right? And most of us would agree

5:20

workers have pricing power right now.

5:22

And this all comes from the IMF's

5:24

working paper on wage price spiral. It's

5:26

an older paper. It's not from uh it's

5:28

not from recent times here, but it tells

5:30

us what to identify or what to look for

5:32

to identify wage price spirals starting.

5:35

And they say that wage price spirals

5:36

start to happen uh when businesses seek

5:39

to increase or maintain their profit

5:41

margins by raising prices and employees

5:44

or workers seek to maintain their real

5:46

purchasing power by demanding more pay.

5:49

And so this is what's really

5:51

interesting. If you look at what Kathy

5:53

Wood told you just a couple days ago, uh

5:56

she said, "Oh, year-over-year inflation

5:58

data is 7% and year-over-year wage

6:01

growth is 5.6%." That means real wages

6:04

fell. That means workers don't have

6:06

pricing power and we're heading towards

6:07

deflation. Well, unfortunately, we've

6:10

got bad news for Kathy Wood because we

6:12

got the January employment report and

6:15

today's inflation report. Both of them

6:17

had something scary in it that folks

6:18

aren't talking about right now. The CPI

6:21

report said that wage earners saw their

6:23

wages increase 8.2% over the last 12

6:27

months. That means real wages are now

6:29

growing by about 1%. 8.2 2 minus where

6:32

we are now 7.4 four threeish somewhere

6:35

around here 7.5ish with inflation

6:36

somewhere between 7 to 1% of real wage

6:40

growth which actually means individuals

6:42

purchasing power is growing and the IMF

6:45

tells us if individuals sorry wage

6:47

pricing power uh the IMF tells us that

6:49

if wage pricing power is growing we

6:52

could be at the start of a wage price

6:53

cycle and that's a boogeyman that

6:55

markets might try to unfortunately start

6:57

pricing in see we also had the jobs

7:00

report about a week ago that told us

7:01

average hourly earnings increased 23

7:04

cents in January or 8.8% month

7:06

overmonth. Reiterating this about 1%

7:09

increase in purchasing power. And now

7:12

real wages are actually growing more

7:15

than inflation despite the fact that

7:16

inflation is so high. This is dangerous

7:19

because it indicates the start of the

7:21

wage price spiral, which unfortunately

7:23

could self- sustain high inflation until

7:26

the Federal Reserve finally comes out

7:28

and ends this nastiness by properly

7:31

raising rates quickly. And it's going to

7:34

be quite a bit of rate increases that we

7:36

need because individuals still have more

7:37

cash balances, so they don't necessarily

7:39

have to borrow. And unfortunately, when

7:41

we get the first rate increases,

7:43

variable rates and lines of credit are

7:45

likely to see their rates go up, which

7:46

means actually input costs at companies

7:49

could go up before demand goes down to

7:52

end the wage price spiral and just

7:54

inflation in general. Now, I know this

7:57

is a lot to take in, but there's even

7:58

more because there's this this thesis

8:01

that well, supply chains will just

8:02

resolve themselves. And this is where we

8:04

end the video, right? Supply chains are

8:05

going to resolve themselves and

8:06

everything's going to be fine. But the

8:08

problem is the Wall Street Journal on

8:10

the front page today says Toyota and

8:13

Honda see lingering shortages and they

8:15

believe that supply chain issues will

8:17

actually stretch throughout the year

8:19

without getting better. As a result,

8:21

you've got insurance companies that who

8:23

are also struggling for the same parts

8:24

as manufacturers like Travelers,

8:26

Progressive, Keer, and State Farm. All

8:28

of them are raising their prices. That

8:30

by the way is right next to that

8:32

article. Car insurers rush to raise

8:34

premiums. State Farm in just the last 6

8:37

weeks has raised rates 2 to 3% in just 6

8:40

weeks. That's a lot on an annualized

8:42

basis. Progressive uh says they've

8:44

raised rates 17% and Keer is raising

8:47

premiums 11%. But they've only raised it

8:50

so far on 50% of their customers. So

8:51

they still got work to do. That means

8:53

more price increases coming. Now there

8:55

is some light. There's some positivity.

8:58

Uh and that for example was buried in

8:59

the B section of the Wall Street Journal

9:01

where hey, you know, Toyota's challenges

9:03

aren't just supply chains. It's because

9:04

they're transitioning. They're going to

9:06

electric vehicles. And you know, we want

9:07

to go green. Unfortunately, going green,

9:10

it doesn't really matter what the reason

9:12

is. Going green or EVs or whatever all

9:15

contribute to more complicated supply

9:18

chains, rebuilding new supply chains.

9:20

This stuff tentatively is expected to

9:21

take a lot longer than we expect. We

9:24

even know that companies that supply

9:27

Apple are complaining uh that they do

9:29

not have enough wafers or that they're

9:31

completely booked out of wafer supply

9:33

for the next 5 years already, which is

9:36

just wild. Now, we do expect to hear

9:38

good news from the big players, right?

9:40

Apple, Amazon, AMD, NPhase, they've all

9:43

seen some improvement in chip supplies,

9:45

which is really good. Part of that could

9:47

be because we saw crypto prices fall.

9:49

Nphase got their hands on more A6, which

9:52

is great. But supply chains improving.

9:55

While that is hope, I'm worried it's

9:58

justopium. If consumers end up with more

10:01

purchasing power because of the wage

10:02

price spiral, supply chains getting

10:04

better might not actually matter.

10:07

Consider this folks, omocron was

10:10

supposed to slow travel and spending.

10:12

What actually happened on a

10:14

month-over-month basis? So multiply them

10:16

by 12 to get an annualized rate. Coffee

10:17

is up 2.7%. Furniture is up 3 to 3.6%.

10:21

Dishes are up 4%. Apparel is up 1% which

10:25

is that's on a month-to-month basis. So

10:26

that's 12% annualized. Specifically,

10:28

girls clothing which is up like 33% on

10:31

an annualized basis. Video and audio

10:33

products up, pet products up,

10:34

recreational products up, appliances up,

10:37

holy smokes. The more good news we get

10:40

from earnings, and we talked about this

10:41

a few weeks ago, and this is the bottom

10:43

line. the more good news we get from

10:44

earnings that people are spending more

10:46

and more money and the more news we get

10:49

that real wages are actually now rising

10:52

increasing people's purchasing power the

10:54

longer this inflation boogeyman is going

10:56

to stick around the more we're going to

10:58

see 10-year treasuries bob up over 2%

11:01

and potentially start running towards

11:03

what people say is a cap of maybe 2 and

11:05

a half% but what if it's not so I hate

11:08

to say it but we've got some issues I

11:10

know this isn't the most bullish video

11:12

but this is all I Yeah, I really hope we

11:14

go back to the moon at some point. We

11:15

hit that soft landing, but I also want

11:18

to be very realistic and hopefully

11:19

that's what you keep coming here for is

11:22

realism. Thanks so much for watching and

11:23

we'll see you in the next one. And make

11:24

sure to go to metaven.com/extra

11:26

to learn more about that extra debit

11:28

card. Thanks so much folks. Bye.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.