The Missing Piece | The Trump Indictment.

well folks everyone has an opinion about

the Trump indictment lawyers and

non-lawyers alike and I've heard a lot

of the opinions I've read almost every

single op-ed piece on this and I am very

surprised that almost everybody seems to

be missing an extremely obvious and the

most dangerous argument against Donald

Trump I'm going to talk about that after

I quickly summarize where we stand so I

can save you as much time as possible so

we can minimize the amount of time that

we have to talk about Donald Trump and

we could go back to learning how to

build wealth so first where do we stand

and then second what is everybody

missing because there's a very key

argument that everybody is missing Bragg

told us about it and everybody is

missing it he didn't highlight it very

well and that's because quite frankly I

think Bragg doesn't know how to put

together a very good legal case I think

he's throwing spaghetti against the wall

but there's a piece of spaghetti that

might actually stick so first Where Do

We Stand oh here becomes Sean Connery

stand by

all right here we go on the left people

say this is the left okay I'm gonna have

to I'm gonna have to signpost this every

time on the left people say Donald Trump

paid thirty thousand dollars to pay off

the National Enquirer who ended up

paying off a doorman who had a story

alleging that Donald Trump had a child

from an affair that child part of the

story we don't know if it's true or not

the left says that Donald Trump then

paid 150 000 and another 130 000 to

silence two women with whom which he

cheated which of course he denies the

left is arguing that Justice is now

finally being served that no one is

above the law and don't worry even

though Manhattan 76 to 78 of the time

Hillary Biden votes Democratic we are

confident Donald Trump will get a fair

election the left also says that New

York City is the financial capital of

the world so we must prosecute Financial

crimes in fact in a New York Times which

obviously leans left opinion editorial

by the former Chief assistant district

attorney who leans left for Manhattan

and the left-leaning special counsel

which means attorney to the house

Judiciary Committee on the first

impeachment trial against Trump which

means they lean left they just wrote an

op-ed saying hey come on Donald Trump is

the 30th person we are Prosecuting this

year for falsifying documents so don't

worry this is not a political Witch Hunt

this is just what we do that's what the

left is saying okay the the right is

saying the following the statute of

limitations has expired although some

New York state laws have actually

potentially extended those statutes of

limitations then they say this is a

political Witch Hunt and quite frankly

it probably is not a political Witch

Hunt anymore it is now a witch trial

yeah okay so it's a Witch Hunt that has

evolved to do a witch trial others say

the state can't prosecute this Donald

Trump was a federal candidate

some people who are a little bit more

torn like the left-leaning economists

say this is a very weak case not only is

this a weak case but it creates more

divisiveness in America it casts more

doubt on the judicial system by

Republicans and The Economist calling

this a mistake is not even an American

publication they're from England

The Wall Street Journal and they're left

leading the Wall Street Journal a

right-leaning paper calls this a quote

novel interpretation to which of course

the left-leaning opinion editorialists

in the New York Times State this is not

novel this is normal

even CNN says this is super weak thanks

Sean McGuire statement of facts okay

it's important the statement of facts

basically a whole strung together story

about how Donald Trump at least in part

knew that he was paying people off in

fact in a surreptitiously recorded

statement Donald Trump asked if he

should pay a hundred fifty thousand

dollars in cash essentially to pay off

woman number one who is Karen McDougall

she was a Playboy model she was once

deemed number two to Pamela Anderson in

other words she's very attractive good

for her Donald Trump instead of paying

cash ultimately settled for paying in

check because that's what Michael Cohen

who now has turned on Donald Trump

recommended and Michael Cohen has gone

to jail to prison for being convicted of

campaign finance and violations so these

are the arguments we hear we hear the

statement of facts we don't have to

rehash all of this we know this the last

thing I'd like to say uh and then I want

to get into what everybody is missing

the last thing is just a reminder that

this is a an argument being made about

the potential violation of a misdemeanor

or by violating the uh falsifying of

business records that is a misdemeanor

crime but when it is used in a way to

cover up another crime that misdemeanor

elevates to a classy felony the lowest

available felony which Manhattan has a

history of a demoting 50 of their

felonies to misdemeanors and then only

convicting 50 percent of the remaining

felonies which means they only have

about a 25 felony conviction rate with

that said accuse you some good odds for

Donald Trump with that said obviously

the argument is being made that this

case is about hush money payments the

problem is hush money payments are not

necessarily fraudulent in themselves

hush money payments are not against the

law in themselves if an employee leaves

your company and they could potentially

talk crap about you because you make

racist jokes in the locker room then it

is okay to say hey if you agree not to

say anything thing about the company

would you be willing to take ten

thousand dollars and sign an agreement

to that fact that is normal that is what

happens every single day in America

however Mr Bragg makes the argument that

these hush money payments are actually

defrauding voters that is a very

important it is still not though the

argument that everyone is missing that's

because the argument that hush money

payments defraud voters is weak I'm

going to explain why it is weak first it

does not defraud anyone of money or

property that makes it almost a

potential victimless crime now the

argument could be made that no no no

Kevin the voters are the victims the

voters are the victims because Donald

Trump conspired to promote his candidacy

via unlawful means covering up the fact

that he hid disclosures that should have

been made to voters they had a right

like to know about those cover-ups and

they did not had they maybe Donald Trump

would not have become president okay

that's the argument but that argument is

potentially weak it's weak because

Donald Trump could easily say I didn't

cover up those stories because of

politics those stories would have gotten

me more votes prove otherwise I would

have looked like a top G and I would

have gotten more votes had people known

I got to have sex with the number two

Playboy model of the 90s that's an

argument he could make so his defense

could very Simply Be I wanted to cover

up the story because I didn't want my

wife to know about these potential

Affair rumors which I didn't have the

affair but I wouldn't want my wife to

think there was even a chance of them

that is the easiest defense Donald Trump

can have here okay but listen to this

and then we're gonna move back to

talking Finance listen to this this is

the big piece of the puzzle that's

missing Alvin Bragg threw a piece of

spaghetti against the wall that I think

is very strong

he threw a piece of spaghetti against

the wall and there is a weakness to it

but it is strong

he referenced the fact that it is

possible Michael Cohen and Donald Trump

falsified tax filings that folks is a

crime in the state of New York now you

don't even have to worry about federal

law you don't even have to worry that

Donald Trump was not a state candidate

he was a federal candidate you don't

even have to worry about that you just

have to worry about is it possible that

the falsification of business records

helps cover up

phony tax filings that piece of

spaghetti I think is the potential

Achilles heel for Donald Trump now I

still don't think that is very strong

because here's how I would potentially

argue defending that you could make the

argument that listen Donald Trump simply

said I paid Michael Cohen call it three

hundred thousand dollars and if with

that three hundred thousand dollars he

decided he wanted to make a business

expense and pay off Stormy Daniels and

uh Karen McDougall and pay off uh a

doorman then maybe he did that and the

duty of his job that was his decision he

went to jail for that that was not my

decision I did not guide him to do that

that was all him that's Donald Trump's

defense here but Alvin Bragg can take a

jurisdictional argument on the case of

fraud of the tax system that is probably

the strongest piece that Bragg has let

me quickly draw this and then we're

going to end the Trump segment because

people keep telling me Kevin you're a

financial advisor talk finances pitch us

on your courses on building your wealth

link down below or life insurance you

can get in as little as five minutes or

12 free stocks you know give us your

paid promotions don't talk politics

that's what people keep telling me but

I'm going to do it anyway so what do I

have over here because I think I have a

good point

watch this okay if this is Trump's

business right here and Trump hires

employees well employees sit within the

company correct well by definition

independent contractors are not

employees of the business if Michael

Cohen has a business here and Donald

Trump pays for Legal Services

for whatever those Services may be if

those Legal Services go to Michael Cohen

those Legal Services call it what you

want they are Income they are income

Michael Cohen was an independent

contractor though that is income for

Legal Services simple if Michael Cohen

decided then to spend that money on

prostitutes for himself he could do that

if he decided to spend that money on

hush money for Stormy Daniels woman one

woman two uh uh you know uh doorman he

can do that if he thinks that's going to

help do a better job for Donald Trump he

could do that if he thinks buying a

private jet with Donald Trump's money

helps he could do that now Donald Trump

might look and go you're fired because

you're wasting money and you're not

performing

but all of these things would be the

decision of Michael Cohen and that is

the defense that Donald Trump would have

to go with that there is a decisional

barrier here that Donald Trump is

basically saying look you run the show

it's on you whatever decisions you make

as an independent contractor are your

responsibility that's probably the best

defense here because that kills the tax

fraud argument in my opinion

now stand by for the close of this video

look

obviously this whether you are left or

right is a politically motivated uh uh

attack

Democrats are loving this Republicans

are loving this too because Donnie T is

getting more air time and more donations

than ever before Donnie T before this

indictment was sitting in a corner

nobody was paying attention to Donnie T

people were like oh Nikki Haley ooh

Ronnie D oh Gavin Newsom what do you

have now

Donnie everywhere everyone's talking

about Donnie so if you're a Democrat and

you're happy about this indictment

even though this is probably just going

to end up as a stupid misdemeanor even

if Donald Trump gets convicted and he's

gonna get a slap on the wrist fine it's

not going to be made it's gonna be

meaningless if anything is just gonna

Propel him into the presidency not get

him away from the presidency Democrats

I'm sorry you should not be cheering

that this happened Republicans

should probably be the ones sharing that

this has happened because it basically

put Donald Trump back at the top for

them just saying that's just the reality

of it I don't have a horse in this race

I don't really care I just want to

provide Insight in the middle I ran for

governor in California I ran as somebody

who was in the middle 51.49

and we really don't need to go into what

direction that one percent is because it

really just doesn't matter we're so far

in the middle I called myself I'm not

going to say it what I called myself JFK

style that's well I limit it there

anyway okay very very in the middle

I lost I almost had a million votes and

I won San Francisco but I still lost

that's why I'm here still making

wonderful YouTube videos although I

think I would have still made YouTube

videos in office

uh I would have figured it out but

anyway that's my take I hope you enjoyed

my take on Donny T now we got some other

things to talk about thank you very much