TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Ted Cruz CONFRONTED by Becky Quick on CNBC.

24m 42s4,617 words660 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

you know Joe Biden started off with a

0:02

position he wouldn't talk at all he

0:03

wouldn't compromise he was unwilling to

0:05

consider anything that was obviously

0:07

unreasonable and and he had to fold from

0:10

that because it that didn't withstand

0:11

scrutiny

0:13

where we are now I don't know if the

0:16

White House is willing to be reasonable

0:18

I I'll tell you what I've encouraged

0:20

President Joe Biden to do which is

0:22

listen to Vice President Joe Biden in

0:24

2011 the last big debt ceiling Showdown

0:26

we had

0:28

where Republicans held a line and said

0:30

we need to rein in spending it was Vice

0:32

President Joe Biden who negotiated what

0:34

was called the budget Control Act

0:35

designed to cut 2.3 trillion in spending

0:38

and he sat down with with Mitch

0:40

McConnell and and with with the house

0:42

speaker and they negotiated that deal

0:45

I hope Joe Biden as president has at

0:48

least some modicum of the same

0:50

willingness to do that I'm worried that

0:52

he doesn't have the ability to do it

0:54

anymore and and look I will say honestly

0:56

this is going to be a negotiation that

0:58

plays out Kevin McCarthy definitely has

1:00

a stronger hand because he passed the

1:02

bill in the house that gives him a

1:03

stronger negotiating power he is not

1:04

going to take something to the floor

1:05

that he can't get at least a majority of

1:07

his caucus to sign off on so hopefully

1:09

the two of them can work some sort of a

1:12

deal out look I think we both agree that

1:15

it's not a good scenario any way shape

1:18

or form if we default on our debt we

1:20

should absolutely not default on the

1:22

debt and and I will tell you I'm I am

1:24

more worried now that we might default

1:26

than I ever have been really and the

1:28

reason is I don't think Biden is is up

1:31

to the task I don't think he's engaged

1:33

in the negotiations personally and

1:35

directly

1:37

yeah they literally met yesterday what

1:40

are you talking about Ted his mental

1:42

capacities are markedly diminished from

1:45

from even a few years ago and don't make

1:49

me go through this and what what makes

1:51

me worry is yeah I think the decision

1:53

making in the White House is being done

1:55

by a bunch of 20-something and 30

1:57

something little marxists who don't have

2:00

an appreciation for reality I told you I

2:03

didn't want to dig into this we're going

2:04

to get stuck digging into this I mean I

2:06

will say the same argument there have

2:08

been people who questioned the last

2:10

president's ability to be able to have

2:13

rational conversations and do these

2:14

things there were people who were

2:15

talking about having him removed with

2:17

the 25th Amendment but look he's in the

2:20

room he's making the talks hopefully so

2:23

I can tell you the reality all right

2:25

when the Senate is in session every

2:26

Republican senator we have lunch

2:27

together

2:28

we sit around and talk about how

2:30

virtually none of us have spoken to the

2:32

president even once he doesn't talk to

2:35

Republican Senators and that's weird we

2:37

all know Joe I was sworn into office by

2:39

Vice President Joe Biden he was a man of

2:41

the Senate this White House hides him

2:43

and and it's unfortunate Donald just

2:45

meet with him

2:47

McConnell had met with him briefly but

2:49

it is I used to talk to Trump every week

2:52

sometimes every day I spoke with Obama I

2:55

spoke with Obama regularly it is weird

2:58

Lindsey Graham has flown all over the

3:01

world with Joe Biden for 20 years

3:03

Lindsay hadn't talked with Joe they keep

3:05

him hidden that's not disputed like no

3:07

but nobody denies that they keep him

3:09

he's not doing media he doesn't do media

3:11

he doesn't just sit down with McConnell

3:13

and McCarthy is talking to him every day

3:15

he also just went to the G7 it's not

3:17

like this guy

3:19

I don't want to be in the corner of um

3:22

on on things great if he is then he

3:26

ought to do what he did in 2011. I I

3:27

don't think he is and I'm worried

3:29

because I think the young extreme

3:31

staffers in the White House have no

3:34

appreciation for just how damaging a

3:36

default would be and so I think they are

3:38

quite willing Force the default because

3:41

they think the media will blame it on

3:43

Republicans and I think that would be

3:45

wildly responsible the talking points I

3:47

hear all the time is that this would be

3:48

much worse for the president to go into

3:50

a default because he's the president who

3:52

would get blamed in the next election

3:53

cycle which is why Donald Trump is

3:55

urging anyone in the house to say no so

3:58

I I don't think that's what the White

4:01

House believes I think the White House

4:02

believes whatever happens

4:04

the media will blame it on Republicans

4:06

whether that's true or not I think

4:07

that's what the White House believes and

4:09

and one thing to be clear Joe Biden

4:12

today could take the chances of a

4:14

default to zero here's what I think a

4:16

responsible president would say he would

4:18

stand up and say under no circumstances

4:20

will we ever ever default on the debt no

4:23

matter what the United States honors our

4:25

commitments now how could he do that he

4:26

could do that by claiming the 14th

4:28

Amendment

4:29

I know except that would be patiently

4:32

unconstitutional but but he could do it

4:33

in a very simple way that is clearly

4:35

legal which is that every month federal

4:37

tax revenues coming into the federal

4:39

government

4:39

significantly exceed interest on the

4:42

debt and he could say we're going to pay

4:43

interest on the debt we're not going to

4:45

default everything else that's what's

4:46

called prioritization he could do that

4:48

and then they they're very well may get

4:49

to that situation they may get to that

4:51

situation but the reason that he hasn't

4:54

said that which he could say he could

4:55

take the chances of default to zero the

4:58

reason he hasn't is is I think the White

5:00

House is trying to scare Monger on this

5:02

they're trying to threaten to fall not

5:04

paying the rest of our bills would not

5:05

be great either well but but let's stop

5:07

paying the veterans do you stop paying

5:09

the defense department about paying the

5:11

salaries of people in Congress okay not

5:13

paying the salaries of people in

5:14

Congress would actually be a pretty good

5:16

step so so that that actually those

5:18

should be the first bills they don't pay

5:19

actually to be clear everyone agreed

5:23

that the death ceiling needs to be

5:25

raised but if you look historically it

5:28

has been the only leverage that has been

5:30

effective in reigning in out of control

5:32

spending look it's a negotiating tool I

5:34

get it and it's the only thing that

5:35

works and you know given squawk bucks

5:38

get it gets into the numbers I think

5:39

it's worth pausing for a second and

5:41

reflecting at how different this is from

5:43

the past so 2017

5:45

total federal spending was about four

5:47

trillion dollars

5:49

total federal tax revenue was about 3.3

5:52

trillion dollars now quick math that

5:53

means we had about a 700 billion dollar

5:55

deficit that was 2017.

5:57

fast forward to today

5:59

total spending has gone from 4 trillion

6:02

up to six and a half trillion dollars

6:04

six point four trillion dollars tax

6:06

revenues have exploded tax revenues have

6:09

gone from 3.3 trillion

6:11

to 4.8 trillion now quick pause to note

6:15

when we signed the 2017 tax cuts that I

6:18

fought very hard to pass

6:19

every Democrat went on TV and said this

6:21

is going to slash Federal revenues and

6:23

blow up the deficit turns out they were

6:25

entirely wrong on that every year

6:27

federal tax revenues have gone up and

6:28

they've gone up from 3.3 trillion

6:31

to 4.8 trillion the problem isn't

6:35

tax revenues the problem is we had a

6:38

spending binge from the Democrats that

6:40

has caused the national debt to go from

6:42

20 billion to 30 to 20 trillion rather

6:44

to 32 trillion reasons infrastructure

6:47

Bill a chip spill the ridiculously named

6:50

inflation reduction act yeah look I

6:52

voted against those bills those were

6:53

mistakes you voted against the

6:54

infrastructure Bill too yes

6:56

okay so there are people who who would

6:58

say even once we get through that you

6:59

got to cut the spending back because

7:00

those are long-term projects that maybe

7:02

even if they were in need of spending

7:04

and by the way if the infrastructure

7:06

Bill had focused on actual roads and

7:08

bridges and infrastructure that we need

7:09

I would have happily voted for it the

7:11

problem was it was filled with with all

7:13

sorts of goodies for special interest

7:15

that had nothing to do with real

7:16

infrastructure so you said

7:19

the numbers so CNBC so the S P 500 is at

7:22

4200 there seems to be a firm belief in

7:24

the market that a deal will be reached

7:25

it sounds like you you're saying to

7:27

Market participants brace yourself

7:29

because we could actually go to default

7:32

that's a scenario that we are not

7:34

pricing into the markets right now I

7:35

agree and listen I think a deal will be

7:37

reached I think at the end even though

7:40

you're saying Joe Biden's not going to

7:41

be the vice president of 2011 you think

7:43

a deal is going to be I think a deal

7:44

will be reached but I worry that the

7:47

chances of a default are greater than

7:48

they ever have been that I worry that

7:50

this White House is reckless enough to

7:53

force a default I don't think that'll

7:55

happen I think that's less likely than

7:56

not but the odds are higher than than we

7:59

should be happy with

8:01

let's switch to technology we were just

8:02

having a well the the discussion about

8:05

what happened yes we'll respond to some

8:07

of these things as well in just a moment

8:08

sure of the Pentagon being bombed

8:11

what what else can you imagine under the

8:13

scenario how do you stop it how do you

8:15

make sure that this is not going to be

8:17

something that we have to be worried

8:19

about every day oh look it's it's a

8:21

Brave New World we're in and and it is

8:24

frightening between technology the

8:25

technology of deep fakes between where

8:28

AI is going

8:30

um it's just going to be a very

8:32

dangerous environment for the

8:34

foreseeable future and

8:36

we're going to have to have real

8:38

skepticism to almost anything you see to

8:40

make sure it is real and accurate it's

8:42

not going to be that hard to suddenly

8:45

have video of some politician saying

8:47

something they never said uh or somebody

8:50

you know people doing things that never

8:52

happened and and so it's going to be

8:53

incumbent

8:54

on it's actually why I'm a big believer

8:57

in in free speech that if you have lots

8:59

of people engaged uh you can have

9:03

real-time fact checking you remember one

9:05

of the first big instances of this was

9:07

Dan Rather back in I guess it was 2004

9:09

where he had 60 Minutes this Brig big

9:12

expose on George W bush with these

9:14

documents and you know it's one of the

9:16

first instances of I guess there's a

9:18

bunch of you know bloggers in their

9:19

pajamas who noticed the documents that

9:22

he claimed to have appeared to be

9:24

fraudulent and it ended up within a

9:27

couple of days revealing that they were

9:28

faking fraudulent documents that was one

9:31

of the first real illustrations to me of

9:33

the power of the community of folks

9:36

online being able to point to facts and

9:38

correct them and and with new technology

9:40

we're going to need to do that it's

9:41

easier to do that when you have a

9:43

limited number of news sources and a

9:44

bunch of people

9:45

when everybody is a news service which

9:48

is essentially what you have on a lot of

9:49

these social media apps you know that

9:51

that becomes it's how something can get

9:55

faked and spread instantaneously and

9:56

before you have the time to fact check

9:58

it yeah

10:00

there's questions about security

10:02

something along those lines

10:05

say yes and no

10:07

um

10:09

I worry about what has happened to much

10:11

of the media there's a reason I like

10:13

coming on squat box because because you

10:15

all actually talk about substance and

10:18

you get into it and and you guys are

10:20

much much less partisan than most of the

10:22

other media Outlets out there

10:24

um one of the really unfortunate

10:27

consequences I think of the age of trump

10:29

is that much of the media Trump broke

10:32

the media that that stations like CNN

10:35

MSNBC

10:37

they hate Trump so much

10:40

that they've stopped practicing

10:41

journalism and and I don't think that's

10:43

good for America when

10:45

when people who are supposed to be

10:47

journalists view their role as advocates

10:50

pushing a point of view particularly in

10:52

that context I think it's important to

10:54

have lots and lots of people where

10:56

everyone can be a publisher and can

10:57

press back so the media is broken but

11:00

back to the question is there anything

11:02

Congress can do about AI because

11:04

misinformation can spread and it's like

11:06

shouting fire in a crowded movie theater

11:08

and and in this case it could be

11:10

billions of dollars in market cap shaved

11:12

off the stock market a single stock so

11:16

many different ramifications here well

11:18

it's it's not like Congress is going to

11:20

be able to waive a magic wand and make

11:22

ai go away

11:23

um it's not like Congress is going to be

11:25

able to stop uh criminal activity and

11:28

make suddenly criminals go away either

11:30

but you stand up on an amicus brief

11:32

against section 230 and I think that's a

11:34

good start yeah absolutely yeah look

11:36

section 230 was passed at a time when

11:39

the internet barely existed and it was

11:42

designed to protect a Nason industry and

11:44

to enable it to grow we now have big

11:46

Tech is are these massive behemoths the

11:50

largest companies in the world and the

11:53

power they exercise the Monopoly control

11:55

they exercise and in particular 230

11:58

when it was passed Congress assumed that

12:01

big Tech would be a neutral Public

12:03

Square in other words it wouldn't be

12:05

putting it some on the scale it wouldn't

12:06

be silencing some voices and not others

12:08

but it would let everyone speak and and

12:10

the reasoning was it's not fair to sue

12:13

Facebook because of a comment you make

12:16

or I make because if you make it or I

12:17

make it it's not Facebook's fault now

12:19

now that's true if they're an open

12:21

Public Square for everyone

12:23

what's happened is that big Tech in

12:25

recent years has decided to actively and

12:28

aggressively censor speech

12:30

and silence views they disagree with and

12:33

I gotta say Elon musk's buying Twitter

12:35

and making the Twitter files public was

12:37

an absolute Game Changer if that is your

12:39

view though about big Tack and their

12:41

ability to control speech Etc then that

12:43

should be even more of a concern when it

12:45

comes to AI yeah they are the leaders in

12:47

AI right now they're the ones that have

12:48

accrued billions of Market billions of

12:50

dollars in market cap because of the

12:52

notion they are in the lead on AI so is

12:54

that a much bigger concern and how does

12:56

it factor in also because there's a

12:57

thinking that if you if you constrain

12:59

the development of AI in this country

13:01

that you're going to actually allow

13:03

other countries particularly China right

13:05

to take the lead in this technology look

13:07

I think you make a very good point and I

13:09

am quite nervous about constraining the

13:11

development of AI and are there very

13:15

real dangers coming from AI across the

13:18

board yes I I chaired the very first

13:20

congressional hearing ever on artificial

13:22

intelligence

13:24

the problem is and and is there a need

13:26

for congressional action on some point

13:28

almost surely there is but the problem

13:30

is most people in Congress don't

13:32

understand this at all look we don't do

13:34

intelligence very well much less

13:35

artificial intelligence

13:37

um and you know the Senate I think the

13:39

median age is about 142.

13:41

um you know one of my colleagues on

13:43

Judiciary referred to the internet as a

13:45

system of tubes

13:48

we should be careful asking folks who

13:51

don't really understand it to regulate

13:53

it I think Congress needs to get smarter

13:54

I think we need to have hearings I think

13:56

we need to consider testimony but I

13:58

think we should proceed slowly so that

14:00

we don't go in and break things the last

14:02

thing I want is for China to get way way

14:05

ahead of us on AI because government

14:07

Regulators have gotten in the way

14:09

so it is reasonable to be worried about

14:12

where AI is taking us but I don't think

14:15

Congress is going to fix the problem

14:16

overnight

14:18

Crews want to thank you for coming in

14:19

today always a pleasure good to see you

14:22

this was actually surprisingly a really

14:24

good piece like that's one of the

14:26

reasons I like this five to uh you know

14:29

six o'clock hour even though this began

14:31

a little bit before that with CNBC is is

14:34

they they have really good guests on

14:35

around this time uh and uh it really

14:39

better than than what you see or closer

14:41

to Bell time on CNBC or or earlier in

14:44

the morning uh just my take you know

14:46

anyway so uh I'll go backwards here a

14:49

little bit and just address a few things

14:50

uh first of all a lot of people are

14:52

talking about investing in Chinese AI uh

14:56

I actually think there's a reason to be

14:58

cautious about that specifically because

15:02

with uh Chinese AI you're running into

15:06

severe risks of U.S sanctions basically

15:10

destroying Chinese AI companies I know

15:14

that sounds extreme like how could

15:16

America destroy a company oh a vacant uh

15:20

even just limiting China's access to

15:23

some of the most powerful or Advanced

15:25

microchips could sandbag saw

15:32

social intelligence race and I think

15:34

that's probably exactly why America is

15:38

sanctioning China's ability to get their

15:40

hands on Advanced lithography machines

15:43

to to make uh uh you know uh smaller uh

15:47

transistors uh you know or reduce the

15:50

spacing between them down to you know

15:52

that five to three nanometer uh level uh

15:55

or below that mostly because

15:58

one of the best weapons we have is just

16:01

having better chips than China I still

16:04

refer to China as the uh a teenager of

16:10

the global stage where China is kind of

16:12

coming into its uh discovery of its sort

16:15

of like power like ah you know I'm a I'm

16:19

a big you know uh he had like I went to

16:21

the zoo last week I went to San Diego

16:24

with uh my kids Lauren and I and uh

16:27

they're they're teaching the kids about

16:29

uh you know the gorillas and and it's

16:32

kind of like the gorilla teenagers they

16:35

uh they get really aggressive because

16:37

they're just coming to realize how

16:39

strong they are but they don't know what

16:41

they're doing so they're constantly like

16:42

hurting themselves and stumbling over

16:44

each other and they have to kind of like

16:45

realize how strong they are and to some

16:48

extent it maybe a little bit feels like

16:50

China is kind of like that and so

16:52

personally I I can't invest in China uh

16:55

because a I don't understand like it's a

16:58

totally different culture so I don't

17:00

understand how to even analyze what

17:02

companies would do well with Chinese

17:04

consumers so this is why I've always

17:05

stayed away from from China but also I

17:08

think that the United States and Europe

17:10

will probably make it their mission to

17:11

continue to sort of keep a boot uh or on

17:14

on the neck or or maybe more appropriate

17:17

like keep the the gorilla of China caged

17:21

a little bit basically limit their

17:23

ability to really explode with

17:25

artificial intelligence relative to what

17:28

I think American companies will be able

17:29

to do uh keep in mind as well you know

17:31

just sort of on the the uh a topic of

17:34

China Joe Biden's suggested potentially

17:38

some softening relations coming with

17:39

China I really believe this is because

17:41

they have to you know China's GDP is

17:45

coming in uh or is expected to come in

17:47

substantially lower than what they've

17:48

been growing at the last like two

17:50

decades and they've been growing at

17:52

somewhere around 8.9 percent now their

17:54

GDP will grow somewhere around five

17:56

percent and they're trying to stimulate

17:58

their economy to grow more because they

18:00

want that growth uh the United States

18:02

has way more Partnerships around the

18:04

world than China does and and their

18:06

their potentially way stronger I mean

18:09

think about American alliances are not

18:11

just trade Partnerships but they're

18:13

defense Partnerships uh sure China's got

18:16

their Belt Road initiative and they've

18:18

got some friends in Pakistan and North

18:20

Korea and maybe Iran now after their

18:22

negotiations with the Saudis but I mean

18:25

when you look at and then maybe you

18:27

could say Russia but I mean what kind of

18:28

friend is that I mean that's you know

18:30

that's the Loose Cannon friend you're

18:31

like you know just just leave us alone

18:33

but maybe uh settle down you know China

18:36

really ought to condemn Russia but I

18:38

don't want to go like super deep here on

18:40

China but but really if if you think

18:42

about it

18:43

it's it's tough It's it's tough to argue

18:46

that investing in Chinese chips or AI is

18:51

the best move when you know the

18:52

International Community is good to do

18:54

everything they can to limit uh Chinese

18:57

growth now then you wonder like okay

18:58

well how much of that is already priced

18:59

in I I I don't know you have to figure

19:01

that one out but then again trying to

19:03

underwrite Chinese stocks with with

19:06

their public filings relative to what we

19:08

have and I'm not saying in companies

19:09

with public filings over here are not

19:10

shysters there are plenty of reasons to

19:13

think that companies with public filings

19:15

are are you know shysters uh like just

19:19

look at uh not to mention any names not

19:21

possible uh but um but yeah so so going

19:24

back to Ted Cruz's argument

19:26

I'm not terribly worried about Chinese

19:29

AI

19:30

uh as an individual mostly because I

19:33

actually think that

19:34

Congress uh we'll give them credit there

19:37

and the International Community will

19:39

already cage in China so uh that that

19:42

leaves me less worried about that uh and

19:45

uh it will be interesting to see how

19:47

regulation evolves for for AI here but

19:50

uh you know that that'll all come in

19:52

time probably too late as it usually

19:54

does uh there's already research now

19:56

that AI is getting more attention than

19:59

Bitcoin has been getting over the past

20:02

three to four to five years I find it

20:04

very interesting because the stock

20:05

market's been trending up but Bitcoin

20:08

really has that I mean Bitcoin had a

20:10

really nice run there so yeah we're at

20:13

27 3 right now uh so it's done very well

20:16

because it's nearly doubled right I mean

20:19

we're at 15 something so so maybe it's

20:21

just on its uh natural break so to speak

20:24

you know you go to the one year yeah

20:26

we're about to the same level as the one

20:28

year on BTC right now but uh at the

20:31

start of the year we were at 16 nine so

20:34

I think it's Bitcoin just fine because

20:35

if you think about it it's outperformed

20:37

the other indices 16 9 yeah it's up 61

20:39

it's way outperformed you know it's

20:41

basically performed like a tech stock

20:43

not not the NASDAQ though nasdaq's only

20:46

up like 27 but anyway

20:48

uh this uh this debt ceiling just to

20:51

sort of finish that

20:54

it's interesting that Ted Cruz argues

20:56

that Joe Biden should come out and

20:58

declare that America will not default

21:01

when and this is what I just so much

21:04

hate about politics

21:06

it's literally what Joe Biden has done

21:09

and I'm not here to like shell a party

21:12

or Joe Biden or whatever but you know

21:16

of course if you're Joe Biden you're

21:18

like we will not default and then the

21:20

Republicans are like man if only Joe

21:21

Biden would come out and say we will not

21:23

default you know it's Gotta suck being

21:25

the president because you're just like

21:26

dude I literally just said that man if

21:29

only he would just say it it's like ah

21:33

uh but uh but I I think that Ted is you

21:37

know the talk was good but I think it's

21:39

there's a little bit of extremeness in

21:42

this idea that uh you know the the

21:45

quote-unquote 20 year olds in the White

21:49

House are willing to let the uh

21:52

government default I uh I'm not that

21:55

skeptical do I think that uh Joe Biden

21:58

is at a hundred percent in that mental

22:00

capacity Department no uh but I do do I

22:03

think that like somehow uh woke left

22:06

this uh 20 year old staffers are running

22:09

the White House

22:10

I mean hopefully not I mean nobody knows

22:12

but but I I don't think that would lead

22:14

to a default I think that's a really

22:15

weak argument to say that oh yeah woke

22:18

leftists who are 20 years old they're

22:19

gonna be willing to gamble uh you know

22:22

our entire economy on this debt ceiling

22:25

negotiation it actually it doesn't sound

22:28

like the negotiations are going that

22:30

badly and this is what you know earlier

22:32

we started on the Dead Sea land like

22:33

this is just so annoying but really I

22:35

mean every day it's like uh you'll get

22:38

the oh Republicans walked out and then

22:40

like a day later things are better or

22:43

like Kevin McCarthy on Sunday Joe Biden

22:46

should be here instead of at the G7 it's

22:49

like dude the presidents are always at

22:52

the G7 meeting the United States

22:54

president has never missed a meeting of

22:56

the G7 because if they did it would be

22:58

G6

23:00

okay well has never been a gsign no uh

23:04

so

23:05

the United States president has never

23:06

missed that meeting and then over the

23:08

weekend you get Kevin McCarthy well Joe

23:10

Biden should be here instead of over

23:12

there it's like that's a popular thing

23:14

to say but like

23:16

you can't all of a sudden stop the the

23:18

global calendar of events uh you know

23:22

because you want to sit down and Duke

23:23

things out and sure enough they end up

23:24

sitting down and and you know had

23:26

Progressive talks uh so I I I don't know

23:30

I I uh I think Becky quick really held

23:33

uh held a good discussion here with with

23:35

Ted uh you know I obviously uh it's a

23:39

lot of it's party talk but uh none of

23:41

this was particularly scary and uh

23:46

I don't know what to say other than that

23:48

not not scared uh maybe uh the lead are

23:53

we able to say that though because I

23:54

feel like the stock market is slightly

23:56

uh taken to continue red today after

23:58

yesterday's rally but then again you

23:59

would kind of expect a little bit of a

24:01

get a give back so uh that's uh that's

24:04

pretty typical now I want you to know

24:06

this when it comes to AI time is what's

24:09

going to make you money and if you can

24:12

prove that value to an employer you'll

24:15

always be able to be employed so this is

24:17

another way of making sure that you

24:19

don't get replaced

24:30

[Music]

24:38

foreign

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.