TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Yikes: Major Warnings & Trump Flips AGAIN

23m 11s4,357 words640 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

So we could see a significant decline in

0:03

consumer spending. Uh inflation

0:06

expectations have gone up. They know

0:09

they know that's going to happen and

0:11

businesses business investment in this

0:13

type of environment. I would really

0:15

expect it to decline. Um we would be

0:18

lucky to skirt a recession and I I it

0:22

should we I I would expect some

0:25

indications in the hard hard data soon.

0:28

There's a loss of confidence in US

0:31

economic policy and even perhaps the

0:35

safety of Treasury securities which are

0:37

the bedrock of and um the safest um

0:42

asset on the planet. Hey, in this video

0:44

I'm going to provide you a big bank

0:46

warning from Jamie Diamond over at JP

0:48

Morgan in his shareholder letter. I'm

0:50

going to break that down for you. We'll

0:52

keep it short. We'll also look at a

0:53

warning from Morgan Stanley and then I'm

0:55

going to give you a breakdown of all of

0:56

the tariff updates that you need to know

0:58

about. First, as just sort of an

1:00

introduction, mostly because I think

1:01

it's kind of interesting. Kevin Hed

1:04

comes out with an official position from

1:05

the Trump administration and just

1:07

minutes ago tells us there is zero

1:09

chance of a recession in 2025. Quote, no

1:13

chance. So, um, the government just told

1:16

us there's no recession, so I guess

1:17

we're good to go. So,

1:20

uh, party goes on. Uh, in honor of this,

1:24

the volatility index today is down

1:27

17.76%, which I thought was quite

1:29

patriotic and almost unironic. It was it

1:32

was just perfect. And that's mostly

1:34

because things really seem to have

1:36

calmed down. The fear indices have moved

1:39

from the lowest levels of extreme fear

1:42

to extreme fear, but not as extreme of

1:46

extreme fear, which is nice. For

1:48

example, on the uh greed and fear index,

1:50

we've moved from a four to a 22. So,

1:52

we're still in the extreme fear

1:54

category, but we're almost out of it,

1:56

which is leading a lot of folks to say,

1:57

"Hey, maybe the market bottom is in."

1:59

Well, this is where I think what we

2:01

should do is take a look at what JP

2:03

Morgan has to say. So, the first thing

2:05

that JP Morgan argues in their earnings

2:08

call is that it's way too soon to see in

2:10

consumer data if we're actually going to

2:12

go into a recession or not. And whether

2:13

we do or don't, JP Morgan is positioned

2:16

for a recession or not. Okay, I'm

2:18

bottomlining a lot of research for you

2:19

and a lot of the earnings call for you

2:21

to keep this simple for you. Jamie

2:23

Diamond says we have a 50/50 chance of a

2:25

recession. And so, yes, the odds of

2:28

recession are substantially higher today

2:29

than ever in the past. Uh, and while S&P

2:33

500's the the earnings for the S&P 500

2:36

are estimated to be at about 5% this

2:39

year, he believes that we're probably

2:42

going to be closer to -5 to

2:46

0%. So, he sees 0% in other words, no

2:49

growth in 2025 as a baseline. And I

2:52

think this is really interesting because

2:54

with course members this morning we were

2:56

analyzing some of the forecasts for

2:57

earnings for example for Nvidia along

3:00

with many other companies and we've seen

3:02

a lot of earnings revisions come in and

3:04

they've come in pretty harsh to where

3:06

the earnings revisions have really

3:08

slapped the growth estimates for some of

3:10

these companies pretty hard. And now

3:13

that lets us update our valuation models

3:15

a little bit combining what we think is

3:17

going to happen with you know sort of

3:18

what the Wall Street consensus is. And

3:20

like that's what I like to do. What's

3:22

Wall Street consensus? And then do I

3:24

believe that's low or high? And then I

3:25

could sort of project what I think a

3:27

fundamental value for a stock is from

3:29

there. This is obviously very different

3:32

from oh, Weeble stock is going up. Let's

3:36

buy it cuz it's going to go to the moon.

3:37

Um, it might be going to the moon right

3:39

now probably because only 2% of its

3:42

shares are outstanding, which is really

3:44

low. Newsmax was 6% of its shares

3:47

outstanding and it skyrocketed. and then

3:50

subsequently just like any momentum

3:52

stock crashed. So I expect the same to

3:54

happen at Weeble. Although I will say

3:57

before their preferred share adjustments

3:59

in 2023, they're actually profitable. So

4:01

I was kind of impressed by that. So good

4:03

for them. Congrats Weeble. But anyway,

4:05

that said, there's there's a lot you

4:07

could do here with real fundamental

4:09

analysis now that we're getting new

4:10

estimates coming out. And Jamie Diamond

4:12

gives you a little bit of a formula for

4:14

that. Don't expect much growth in 2025.

4:16

and he says, "Look, if we have a mild

4:18

recession, obviously things will be

4:20

worse. If we have a bad recession,

4:22

things will be even worse." They say

4:24

this, they talk about this in their

4:25

earnings call, but it's not so much a

4:28

matter of what's in the earnings call

4:31

about speculation over what's going to

4:33

happen with earnings that matters in

4:35

this trade warfare. What matters more to

4:37

Jaime Diamond is actually what's

4:39

happening on a global level. And this is

4:41

the Jaime Diamond warning and bank

4:43

warning. I'll provide you that. Then

4:44

we'll go into Morgan Stanley and other

4:46

tariff updates. The big JP Morgan or

4:48

Jamie Diamond warning is right here. It

4:51

basically argues that through tariffs,

4:54

we are potentially fracturing

4:57

relationships that we have that preserve

5:00

and prevent war. In fact, he argues the

5:04

following. We've got not only the war in

5:06

Ukraine, terrorism in the Middle East,

5:08

and the real possibility that Iran may

5:09

develop a nuclear weapon. In fairness,

5:12

supposedly we had pretty good indirect

5:14

talks this weekend with Iran. We'll see

5:16

how that develops. Everybody always says

5:18

that and then who knows. But anyway, uh

5:20

Europe's potential fragmentation,

5:22

ongoing trade disputes, the rise of

5:25

China. If Iran acquires a nuclear

5:27

weapon, many other nations around the

5:28

world will seek to acquire nuclear

5:30

weapons, presenting us with a

5:31

catastrophic situation. A nuclear a

5:34

global nuclear arms race is the worst

5:37

outcome that could happen to our world.

5:39

And this may be the greatest threat to

5:41

mankind's survival. Lastly, it is

5:44

extremely important to recognize that

5:45

security and economics are

5:47

interconnected. Economic warfare has

5:50

caused military warfare in the past. And

5:53

Jaime Diamond is right about this. And I

5:55

think as hyperbolic as it sounds that

5:57

we're talking about nuclear

5:59

proliferation, it shouldn't be. We've

6:01

been talking about nuclear

6:02

non-prololiferation for 30 years or more

6:05

now. But I mean do consider the

6:08

Palispanisian wars, Sparta versus

6:10

Athens, all about money. Ancient wars,

6:14

money. Dutch Republic versus England,

6:16

money. Napoleonic wars, Napoleon

6:19

Bonapart, money. Revolutionary war,

6:22

taxation without representation. Wow.

6:24

The Trump administration is literally

6:26

getting sued by a trade union for that

6:28

today because they argue Trump shouldn't

6:30

be able to use his emergency powers to

6:33

tariff to solve the national debt

6:35

because that doesn't deserve using

6:36

emergency powers. That's actually

6:38

basically a levy of taxation without

6:40

representation and that should be

6:41

conducted by Congress because Congress

6:44

represents us. Of course, Trump

6:45

administration argues, well, y'all voted

6:47

for me. But then again, we have

6:50

representatives for a reason. The war of

6:53

1812 was about money. The Opium Wars

6:55

were about money. People say Russia

6:56

Ukraine is about money. Although a lot

6:58

of people also argue that the war in

7:01

Ukraine is really just a proxy war

7:03

between the United States and Russia and

7:06

really the sides of the world. You have

7:08

the West, so Europe, Canada, uh, and the

7:12

United States along with like the likes

7:14

of Japan and South Korea against China,

7:18

Iran, North Korea, and Russia. Mind you,

7:21

North Koreans, listen to this. I I saved

7:25

this. Actually, I didn't save it. I I

7:26

read it and then I threw it away and

7:28

then No, Lauren threw it away and then I

7:30

had to get it out of the trash can. So,

7:31

I I resaved it, I guess you could say.

7:34

Recycling bin. Okay. But anyway, South

7:36

Korea, sorry, North Korea. North Korea

7:39

per the Financial Times has more than

7:40

11,000 soldiers in Russia. Not only

7:43

that, Iran we know has been supplying

7:46

drones to Russia. They manufacture

7:47

drones in Russia on their behalf. And

7:50

listen to this. This is the craziest

7:51

piece. And this is actually kind of

7:53

scary to me because mind you, China has

7:57

called us the enemy. Obviously, the

7:59

Trump administration has called China

8:01

the enemy. But this is kind of scary.

8:03

Look at

8:04

this. Kiev

8:07

claims Chinese fighters or in

8:12

Russia. Kiev

8:15

captures Chinese men fighting for Putin.

8:20

These are real issues where what we

8:23

really have is on our side, we have a

8:25

CIA that's basically targeting Russians

8:29

with US-made weapons, US-made bombs,

8:32

US-made intelligence, targeting

8:35

Russians, and the Ukrainians are pushing

8:37

the launch button, you know, obviously,

8:39

and much more. They're sacrificing their

8:41

lives, and they're fighting for for

8:42

their territory. But there's a lot of

8:43

CIA involvement here. They're basically

8:46

directly now attacking North Korea and

8:48

China on the battlefield through the

8:51

guise of Russia versus Ukraine. And so

8:54

when you put this together and sort of

8:55

the historical context that yes,

8:57

economic warfare can turn into global

8:59

warfare, Jaime Diamond doesn't actually

9:02

have a bad point. Now, of course, he

9:04

makes the generic arguments too that,

9:05

hey, we need better education in

9:06

America. Social media algorithms are

9:09

making people too divisive. He argues

9:10

that. He's got a whole piece on that. He

9:12

talks about how again we need more

9:13

education and we need more

9:14

industrialization in the United States

9:16

for national security purposes. We can

9:18

agree on all that good stuff, but I

9:20

actually think he provides a very real

9:22

warning that like who cares about just a

9:25

recession. This trade war is more than

9:27

just a recession. At this point, a

9:29

recession almost feels like a foregone

9:31

conclusion. I'll give you Morgan

9:32

Stanley's warning in just a moment, but

9:34

this isn't good. Especially since you've

9:37

got somebody as big as Jaime Diamond

9:39

arguing, hey, you know, be careful. This

9:42

trade war that's going on could lead to

9:44

a lot of unintended consequences and

9:46

they could be really bad for the longer

9:48

term future of America. All right,

9:50

enough of that. It's doom and gloomy

9:52

enough. I want to talk about what Morgan

9:54

Stanley says as a result of sort of like

9:56

all of this I don't know what you would

9:57

call it uncertainty or uh yeah you know

10:01

sort of Trumpism whatever you want to

10:03

call it art of the dealism right uh

10:06

before I do that I just want to quickly

10:07

shout out take me 10 seconds here the

10:08

MCA membership expires tomorrow at 11:59

10:12

p.m. Basically what that means is the

10:13

pricing that there is now is going to be

10:16

a lot higher uh after 11:59 p.m.

10:18

tomorrow's the 15th already. So, if you

10:21

want to lock in this pricing, look at

10:22

that. It's less than a buck 63 a day or

10:24

it's a buck 63 a day here. Buck 63 a

10:26

day. You want to lock in that pricing

10:28

and get access to all the courses, all

10:30

the new lectures, the trade alerts when

10:32

we send them or the course member live

10:34

streams where we literally talk tactical

10:35

trading every single day. We talk

10:38

strategies, alpha report, everything.

10:40

You want to be part of this and the

10:42

fundamental analysis that we do,

10:43

consider subscribing. Go to mekevin.com

10:46

and you will lock in your price forever

10:47

guaranteed. The price will not go up on

10:49

you. that is great. But if you join

10:52

after the 15th, the price will go up and

10:55

when the price goes up, you're locking

10:58

in that higher price. So, this doesn't

11:00

make doesn't mean you get a bad price,

11:02

but it's going to be a lot more than

11:03

this. So, this is a pretty good deal.

11:05

And I encourage you to check this out

11:06

over at mekevin.com within well the

11:08

next, you know, 24 hours or however long

11:10

it is between when you're watching this

11:12

video and uh 11:59 p.m. on the 15th. So,

11:15

check that out over at mekevin.com.

11:17

Okay. So now we need to talk Morgan

11:18

Stanley and get through some of these

11:20

other Trump updates because there are a

11:21

lot of them mind you also. Oh yeah, this

11:23

is worth mentioning this as well. Look

11:24

at this. Uh China ready to work with

11:26

Vietnam. China is already working with

11:29

all of our allies. China's working with

11:30

Canada. China's working with the

11:32

European Union. China is working with

11:33

Vietnam. They're working with Japan.

11:36

Basically, all of our friends are

11:37

working with China. Meanwhile, now China

11:40

is essentially fighting us on the

11:42

battlefield in Ukraine. It's crazy. So

11:45

Jamie Diamond has a really good point

11:46

here and it's something we should pay

11:48

attention to. That said, Morgan Stanley

11:50

uh has some thoughts on this. So Morgan

11:54

Stanley argues that there's so much in

11:57

the way of volatility right now that you

12:00

kind of have to come into this expecting

12:03

that there's going to be more drama

12:05

coming. They literally say investors

12:08

should be prepared to be fooled many

12:11

more times. They say, "Fool me once,

12:14

shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on

12:16

me. Hold your convictions loosely and

12:18

keep your stop losses tight. If a master

12:21

plan exists, such as offsetting negative

12:24

economic impact with tariffs of the

12:26

tariffs with fiscal and monetary easing,

12:29

it's unlikely to work the way Trump

12:32

expects. So in other words, even if they

12:35

magically try to solve everything, don't

12:37

expect the economic damage is going to

12:39

be limited." Now, this is a pretty

12:41

negative POV by Morgan Stanley. And

12:43

honestly, I've seen a lot of pretty

12:45

negative institutions. It's one of the

12:47

reasons why I think today we had some,

12:49

you know, we ran at the beginning of the

12:51

day, we had a pullback in the middle of

12:52

the day, and a little bit of pullback at

12:54

the end of the day, too. But overall, it

12:56

was a relatively positive day, but we're

12:58

just not getting that aggressiveness to

13:00

the upside. Probably because a lot of

13:02

people are looking, saying, you know

13:03

what, this is the perfect time. We're

13:04

still relatively near all-time highs.

13:07

Let's take some money off the table.

13:09

Let's diversify. People are going into

13:10

gold. People are fleeing the dollar.

13:12

They're fleeing the treasuries market,

13:13

which is a mistake. If we go into a

13:15

recession, the Treasury market is going

13:16

to be your best yielding asset of 2025,

13:18

but whatever. That's my take, not

13:20

personalized advice for you. Uh, but

13:22

there are also risks, right? I mean,

13:23

look at the the spread between the

13:25

2-year and the 10ear. It's 53 basis

13:27

points. Anything over 50 puts you at

13:29

shock risk. Imagine you're at the gas

13:32

station, you spilled a bunch of fuel

13:34

over the floor and you're just waiting

13:36

for that guy to walk by who thinks it's

13:37

funny to throw a cigarette, you know,

13:39

flick a cigarette over at your puddle of

13:42

gas. This is a problem. That's the

13:45

situation we're in right now. And I

13:46

think that's why a lot of the

13:47

institutions are like, man, all right,

13:49

we think earnings estimates are going to

13:51

come down. We think growth is going to

13:52

come down. A lot of companies are going

13:53

to pull guidance. They're not going to

13:55

give us guidance because it's too soon

13:56

to tell what's going to happen. Academy

13:58

Securities has a POV on this. Uh they

14:01

suggest that we basically we need to

14:04

become familiar with this Trump behavior

14:07

where we say these outlandish things and

14:09

then or we do outlandish things and then

14:11

they just sort of get normalized and

14:13

then they go away. Like the last time we

14:16

heard anybody mention Canada as the 51st

14:18

state was Marco Rubio in mid-March and

14:22

Academy Securities is like are we just

14:24

giving up on that? Like are we no longer

14:26

annexing Canada? nobody's talking about

14:28

it anymore. And they kind of use this as

14:30

a way to say like, hey, maybe they'll do

14:33

that with stocks or or tariffs as well.

14:37

So, Academy Securities actually goes

14:39

bullish and they say, quote, "I can be

14:42

comfortable that for now the lows are in

14:44

for stocks and the wides are in for

14:47

credit spreads as the economic slowdown

14:50

I fear will take longer to play out and

14:54

might be preempted by rapid policy

14:57

alignment." Okay. So, in other words,

14:59

Academy Securities has hopes that, hey,

15:02

you know, we'll get our tax cut plan.

15:04

We'll get some positive movement on

15:06

tariffs and everything will be fine. And

15:08

in fairness, we got some incredible

15:10

exemptions this weekend that were really

15:12

good for big business. I'll put up all

15:14

the exemptions on screen. They're right

15:15

here. This is the list of uh categories

15:17

for exemptions. Computers, computer

15:19

parts, smartphones. Uh mind you also

15:22

certain manufacturing equipment that's

15:24

critical for companies like SpaceX where

15:27

they buy machines from China to

15:28

manufacture their Starlink chipboards.

15:30

Uh these are included in the exemptions.

15:33

A lot of people got pissed over the

15:34

weekend that this was just like a big

15:36

Wall Street bailout for big firms like

15:39

Apple or Nvidia and Dell and Microsoft

15:41

and they or Google and they really left

15:44

behind smaller businesses because toys

15:46

and furniture and all that stuff.

15:47

They're still subject to 140% tariffs

15:49

with China. Donald Trump to this came

15:51

back and said, well, you know, all these

15:53

are still subject to the 20% fentanyl

15:55

tariffs. We're just moving them to a

15:57

different bucket. And so you've got a

15:59

lot of this sort of like classic

16:01

Trumpism, which is not that they're

16:03

purposfully trying to be as, you know,

16:06

erratic as this. It just seems like they

16:08

sort of make a decision and then they

16:10

don't really think much after they make

16:11

the decision and they just announce the

16:12

decision and then when people are like,

16:14

"Wait, but what about this?" They're

16:15

like, "Oh, yeah. This is actually what

16:17

we meant." So, so this this is one of

16:20

the reasons we're getting this

16:21

volatility. And this is, I think, why

16:22

some institutions are like, "Just get

16:24

used to it." Like that's just what we're

16:25

going to have right now. But at least

16:27

now it feels like we're going down

16:29

rather than up. And in fairness that

16:32

seems true so far. You can see her here

16:34

uh contribution to average US tariff

16:36

rate by end use. This was before

16:38

liberation day. Uh this was on the

16:40

initial wave of tariffs. Uh here was

16:43

liberation

16:44

day. Here was uh liberation day with uh

16:48

a a walk back of liberation day. So one

16:51

week later when liberation day was

16:52

supposed to go into effect we

16:53

unliberated and this was without uh all

16:56

of the reciprocal tariffs on all the

16:58

other countries and then here we are

16:59

with the exemptions for electronic

17:01

components. So you can see the average

17:02

tariff rate has still gone from

17:04

somewhere around 2% to 24%. So we're

17:08

still at major tariff rates. you know,

17:10

Donald Trump is freaking out saying,

17:12

"Hey, it's not fair that, you know, the

17:14

mainstream media is is is purposefully

17:17

trying to ignore that we're trying to

17:19

say, you know, China is still products

17:21

from China are still subject to an

17:23

existing 20% fennel tariffs." He's doing

17:25

this out of somewhat of a frustration

17:27

because it has been very confusing to

17:29

follow exactly what all these changes

17:30

are. So, a lot of people are having

17:32

problems. And I'm not here to defend the

17:33

mainstream media. But it's just it seems

17:35

like every hour there's a new

17:37

interpretation of what's going on,

17:38

especially because right after this

17:40

post, then you got Bessant saying, "Hey,

17:42

we're still expecting to get a lot of

17:44

revenue from China and a lot of tariffs

17:45

to stay in effect for China." Then we

17:48

got Lutnik saying, "Remember this pause

17:50

is just temporary. It's coming back."

17:52

And again, all of it is really

17:54

exhausting. But I will say something

17:55

that is positive because I'm trying to

17:57

give you as much of a balanced POV as

17:59

possible is the Chinese embassy in the

18:01

US has said China is assessing the

18:03

related impact of this you know

18:05

exemption. This is a small step for the

18:08

US side to correct its wrong practice of

18:10

unilateral reciprocal tariffs. Okay,

18:13

that's kind of cool. Obviously uh there

18:16

are some other pieces from institutions

18:18

that say as a macroeconomist the issue

18:20

is uncertainty weighs on corporate

18:22

confidence and this is probably going to

18:24

be a lot worse than 2018 to 2019 which

18:28

significantly reduces our economic

18:31

outlook and this is fair and so this is

18:34

kind of where you just have to pick

18:35

which boat you're on you know are you on

18:37

I don't care if we go into a recession

18:39

we'll be fine which is basically the JP

18:41

Morgan way do you think we need to be as

18:44

worried read as, "Oh, we're going to

18:47

have a nuclear war and an apocalyptic,

18:50

you know, fallout." Probably not. But

18:52

are there reasons why people are fleeing

18:54

to gold and away from the dollar and

18:56

treasuries? Yeah, because it's becoming

18:58

a little harder to understand and

19:00

predict America. Some people are

19:02

predicting that Donald Trump wants to

19:03

just default on the US debt, default on

19:06

treasuries. Basically, stop paying

19:08

interest on treasuries or stop paying it

19:10

back. That'd be crazy and it would

19:12

mostly just hurt Americans. He's also

19:14

been talking about potentially delisting

19:16

Chinese ADRs, which just again hurts

19:19

global confidence in investing in

19:20

America. So, there's some real problems.

19:22

Again, maybe they're all just part of

19:24

the art of the deal, just like, you

19:26

know, pardoning Trevor Milton or

19:27

pardoning the three fraudulent founders

19:29

of BitMX or, you know, firing the person

19:33

who was pursuing fraud charges against

19:36

the executive over at Fat Brands after

19:39

Donald Trump. donated or had donations

19:43

from that executive who worked for Fat

19:45

Brands and then all of a sudden that

19:46

prosecutor gets fired because, you know,

19:49

oh, some executive made delicious

19:52

donations to the Trump uh, you know,

19:55

administration. Uh, another one that was

19:58

found guilty of market manipulation and

20:00

fraud, Justin Sun invested $30 million

20:03

into Donald Trump's World Liberty

20:05

Financial, which is really nothing at

20:08

this point. uh and Donald Trump and the

20:11

you know Trump children have taken

20:12

control of the whole organization

20:15

basically. Uh this person donates

20:17

donates invested $30 million into World

20:20

Liberty Financial and then all of a

20:22

sudden oh charges

20:24

dropped. So you know a lot of people are

20:27

like huh this is interesting including

20:30

like why all of a sudden are so many

20:32

white collar fraud and bribery charges

20:34

being dropped? Oh, because we ended the

20:36

enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt

20:38

Practices Act. Why did we do that? Well,

20:40

the Trump administration says because in

20:42

other countries bribery is normal and we

20:44

want to be competitive. Okay, fine. But

20:47

the point is people like there are

20:50

businesses and companies and investors

20:52

who look at the America and they're

20:54

like, "Okay, this is like the premium

20:56

server where they're going to ban

20:58

hackers."

20:59

And now all of a sudden somebody came in

21:01

and started sound like nah we we don't

21:03

really care if people are hacking. Like

21:04

if somebody hacks, you know, good on

21:06

them. I guess they figured out how to,

21:08

you know, cheat better than you. Uh and

21:10

and that's frustrating a lot of people.

21:12

So that's just like I'm not trying to

21:13

take a POV on it. I'm just trying to

21:15

voice the opinions of of some. And

21:18

that's why you're seeing somewhat of a

21:19

flight from the dollar and bonds and

21:21

into gold. And it's also why you're

21:23

seeing some softness in stocks. Like

21:26

you're not really seeing a skyrocketing

21:28

in stocks again with the exception of

21:29

like Weeble where like 2% of their

21:32

shares are outstanding which is crazy

21:34

again because Newsmax has six had 6% of

21:37

their shares outstanding as as free

21:39

float you know tradable float uh and

21:42

they skyrocketed and then died like a

21:44

meme stock. Weevil only 2% outstanding.

21:48

Wild. So even lower even trying to go

21:50

for small trying to go for even less

21:53

liquidity. It's crazy. So anyway, all of

21:55

this I think is really interesting and

21:57

it really goes to show why there's just

21:59

so much uncertainty. But I think as an

22:01

investor, you just have to look at all

22:03

this and say, "All right, can I get

22:05

through a recession?" Yes or no. If you

22:06

can, great. Then just keep investing in

22:09

what you're good at. If you're good at

22:10

buying the dip, keep doing that. If

22:11

you're good at real estate, keep doing

22:12

that. If you're good at both, do both.

22:14

For us at House Hack, we're going to

22:16

keep raising money. You're welcome to

22:18

invest with us if you want. You earn a

22:20

5% yield. You get upside protection uh

22:22

because you get 100% of the upside of

22:24

the stock as long as our stock value

22:26

goes up and you get downside protection

22:28

which is kind of cool. Check it out over

22:29

at house hack.com. We have an accredited

22:31

race going on and a nonacredited race.

22:33

Make sure to read the uh paperwork

22:34

because this video can't be a

22:35

solicitation. All that said invest the

22:38

way that you think is right for you. But

22:40

so far things do seem to be chilling

22:42

out. V is chilling and we're basically

22:45

just gearing up for the next shock

22:48

because that treasury curve suggests

22:50

we're primed for it. Hopefully it

22:52

doesn't come. Why not advertise these

22:54

things that you told us here? I feel

22:55

like nobody else knows about this. We'll

22:57

we'll try a little advertising and see

22:58

how it goes. Congratulations, man. You

23:00

have done so much. People love you.

23:02

People look up to you. Kevin Praath

23:03

there, financial analyst and YouTuber.

23:05

Meet Kevin. Always great to get your

23:07

take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.