TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Fed *Recession*, Trump LASH OUT, UAW Strike, Tesla & Housing Market Crash | Bottom Line Report [E.2]

48m 30s8,129 words1,172 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

oh boy there's a lot to cover in today's

0:01

a bottom line report housing has hit a

0:04

wall the UAW could single-handedly push

0:07

us into recession will Donald Trump run

0:10

for a third term McDonald's could

0:13

collapse thanks to California and

0:15

instacart's IPO China Tesla and more

0:18

let's get started first McDonald's

0:20

assembly Bill 1228 in California just

0:24

past the state senate and heads to

0:26

newsom's desk for Signature who is

0:28

expected to sign it this will include a

0:31

wage a floor at 20 of per hour for every

0:36

chain with at least 60 locations wage

0:39

increases would take effect April 1st of

0:42

2024 and no that's not a joke that is

0:45

four dollars and fifty cents higher than

0:47

the state's minimum wage for working at

0:49

a fast food establishment the danger

0:52

here according to the National Owners

0:54

Association which represents franchise

0:56

owners is that each franchise could end

0:58

up experiencing around 200 fifty

1:00

thousand dollars more in costs and

1:02

suggests that many McDonald's may end up

1:04

having to close as they can't afford

1:07

this remember most of McDonald's profits

1:10

their corporate profits don't actually

1:12

come from selling you food they come

1:15

from selling you the brand and the real

1:18

estate via an owner who decides to

1:22

become an entrepreneur and run the

1:23

business as a franchise here it is

1:25

directly from McDonald's investor

1:27

relation statement on franchise Revenue

1:31

McDonald's brings in 84 profit margins

1:35

on the actual restaurants that

1:38

McDonald's operates they only bring in

1:40

16 profit in plain English that means

1:44

about 90 cents of every dollar of

1:47

operating income McDonald's has comes

1:50

from the franchise model not from

1:52

actually selling you food they sell the

1:55

stuff to entrepreneurs who run the

1:56

franchise those are the folks who are

1:58

going to have to pay the higher wages on

1:59

two the UAW who is also pushing for

2:02

higher wages the United Auto Workers

2:06

Union could literally push us into a

2:08

recession at least that's what Morgan

2:10

Stanley thinks take a look at this

2:12

research Oregon Stanley researchers just

2:14

outlined that at this point only and

2:17

this is a big only but a quote unquote

2:19

only 13

2:21

000 of the 146 000 union workers that

2:26

are part of the UAW are on strike but

2:29

Morgan Stanley argues the impact to

2:32

economic activity could be large if we

2:36

see a full scale strike that lasts for

2:40

some time the effect of the strike could

2:42

be visible in industrial production but

2:45

most importantly end up hitting GDP of

2:48

course this will end up hitting non-farm

2:49

payrolls if we end up seeing these

2:51

striking workers show up as unemployed

2:54

for a longer period of time and that

2:56

could really weaken the Biden

2:58

administration's claims that Biden

2:59

Comics are really working hard

3:01

especially since we would see a spike in

3:03

unemployment in other words we'd see the

3:05

unemployment rate rise and the number of

3:07

jobs created a fall but take a look at

3:10

this and this is quite important there

3:12

could be a noticeable fourth quarter

3:14

drag on gross domestic product if this

3:19

strike continues specifically consider

3:22

this comparison to 2019. in 2019 a

3:27

limited strike of quote 48

3:30

000 workers which then represented about

3:32

24 percent of vehicle production at the

3:34

time took place in mid-september and

3:38

lasted through October that's about six

3:41

weeks at the time we had to take about

3:43

0.4 percentage points off GDP for the

3:47

fourth quarter now though if the entire

3:51

146

3:52

000 union members of the UAW end up

3:55

striking which has been threatened the

3:58

impact could end up creating a full one

4:02

percentage Point hit to gross domestic

4:05

product in America well folks remember

4:07

when GDP goes negative for two quarters

4:10

in a row you're in a recession again we

4:12

had that q1 22 q22 we all felt that

4:16

whether that was technically a recession

4:18

or not whatever what's more important

4:20

though is going forward listen to this

4:22

her current forecast is for a just 0.1

4:26

percent fourth quarter GP read if you

4:30

subtract off of that one percent thanks

4:33

to a strike you could literally be

4:35

sitting at negative one percent for the

4:38

fourth quarter in

4:40

2023. now that's not expected to pull

4:43

the entire year into a recession but it

4:46

is absolutely expected to set up for a

4:50

recession with Q4 and q1 2024 combined

4:54

unless this strike resolves itself soon

4:57

others then are naturally arguing that

4:59

but if these these workers do end up

5:01

getting their 40 percent pay hikes they

5:04

would end up contributing to inflation

5:06

which would be bad for the Federal

5:07

Reserve however Morgan Stanley disagrees

5:10

with this and they actually argue that

5:13

even if all 146 000 workers got the full

5:16

40 raise we would only see a at about

5:20

0.05 percent increase in average hourly

5:23

earnings over the next four years as a

5:27

bottom line bro it ain't gonna cause

5:29

inflation even if you give a pay bump to

5:31

all of these people but the strike could

5:34

lead to a recession and so what's the

5:36

latest on that negotiation the UAW

5:38

currently suggests that on Friday

5:39

September 22nd which is just a few days

5:42

away the next deadline will be struck

5:46

and then the big three could end up

5:48

facing even more strikes that is the UAW

5:52

would call on more individuals to stand

5:55

up and strike against what they call

5:58

corporate greed and specifically

6:00

executive greed with Executives facing

6:04

potentially per the UAW

6:06

wage increases of over 30 percent while

6:10

wages for workers have only gone up six

6:13

percent over the last four years despite

6:16

the fact that the average price of a car

6:18

is up 34 now this does somewhat

6:22

disregard the inflationary input costs

6:25

that have become more expensive to

6:28

produce vehicles but it does make it

6:31

clear that much like UPS it's probably

6:33

time for workers to get some form of a

6:36

pay bump so far companies like solantis

6:38

have offered a 21 pay increase but the

6:41

UAW so far says that's not enough and on

6:46

top of this we're now expected to

6:48

potentially see unions in Canada join

6:52

striking workers in America axios is

6:54

reporting we could see a 5100 worker

6:57

strike in Canada that would take all all

7:00

Ford workers and contribute to the

7:02

strike this is by the unifor union now

7:04

one thing that's been very misunderstood

7:06

is the average pay of actual UAW workers

7:10

Barons and the Wall Street Journal and a

7:12

lot of mainstream media sources have

7:14

been arguing that the UAW ends up paying

7:17

its workers around 66 dollars per hour

7:20

but most UAW workers throw their hands

7:23

up and say I wish I was getting paid 66

7:27

dollars per hour and it turns out the

7:29

mainstream media along with these

7:31

corporations are collecting together all

7:34

of the potential future benefits these

7:37

employees could earn from not only

7:39

health insurance but also potential

7:42

profit sharing benefits extrapolated

7:44

into the future and then calculated back

7:47

into their hourly earnings this is quite

7:51

deceptive because it makes it a lot

7:52

harder to compare how much individuals

7:55

are actually earning so I tried going to

7:58

some more on unbiased sources as much as

8:01

that as possible I thought one of the

8:03

easiest ways to do this was exploring

8:05

what zip recruiters suggest an average

8:07

UAW salary actually is which is about 25

8:11

dollars per hour or around fifty two

8:14

thousand seven hundred and seventy one

8:15

dollars a per year full-time employees

8:19

at the big three usually make a range of

8:21

between 18 to 32 dollars per hour

8:23

depending on seniority and those as the

8:26

UAW argues are wages that haven't kept

8:28

up with inflation it's also worth noting

8:31

that back in 2008 unions gave

8:34

substantial concessions to the big three

8:38

automakers because the automakers were

8:40

about to go bankrupt this is where Auto

8:43

Executives famously traveled to Congress

8:45

to ask for bailouts and private jets

8:47

wondering when they'd get bailouts and

8:49

Congress said you know what come up with

8:51

a better plan to prove that y'all ain't

8:54

going to go bankrupt anyway even after

8:57

we bail you out this has led others to

8:59

say this time is different and Congress

9:01

will bail out automakers this time

9:03

around for sure and this is all just a

9:05

political ploy to get more stimulus

9:07

money for the automakers but many are

9:10

saying there's no way in hell any

9:12

stimulus money is coming out of Congress

9:14

for legacy automakers so good luck to

9:18

the Legacy autos because nothing

9:20

bipartisan is coming also it's worth

9:23

noting a lot of workers currently

9:25

working for the big three are now

9:27

considered temporary workers who earn a

9:30

lot less and receive a lot less in

9:33

profit sharing benefits in fact

9:34

potentially no profit sharing benefits

9:36

making usually around 1578 to 1928 an

9:40

hour this is a far cry from the 66

9:43

dollars per hour some of the mainstream

9:44

Outlets are suggesting that workers at

9:47

the UAW are actually earning this is

9:50

because of the common number of 66

9:52

dollars per hour which again includes

9:54

all those future benefits being thrown

9:56

around in the media and then folks are

9:58

wondering why are the these union

10:00

workers on strike as a result we now

10:03

have union workers responding going well

10:05

I wish I made 66 dollars an hour here's

10:08

an example 38 year old GM veteran making

10:11

about 32 dollars an hour at a warehouse

10:13

Distributing parts to repair already

10:15

sold GM vehicles argues that newer

10:18

workers end up starting at 17 bucks an

10:20

hour they usually top out at around 25

10:23

an hour and he feels honored that he

10:26

makes 32 dollars an hour either way you

10:28

slice it though this UAW strike could

10:31

potentially leave the Federal Reserve to

10:33

say you know what there is too much

10:35

uncertainty here we could be on the

10:38

brink or on the cusp of seeing a massive

10:40

amount of either layoffs or unemployment

10:43

claims due to these strikes and a real

10:46

hit to GDP in which case we are better

10:49

off pausing to wait and see what happens

10:51

not only with the lagged effects of

10:53

monetary policy but also with this UAW

10:56

strike in fact institutions across us

10:59

Wall Street are now arguing it is

11:01

impossible for the FED to know what kind

11:04

of impact these UAW strikes are going to

11:06

end up having on our American economy

11:08

this is a big deal when Donald Trump was

11:10

asked about these strikes his response

11:12

was the Auto Workers are not going to

11:16

have any jobs when you come right down

11:18

to it because if you take a look at what

11:20

they're doing with electric cars

11:22

electric cars are going to be made in

11:24

China the Auto Workers are not going to

11:26

have any I'll tell you what the Auto

11:28

Workers are being sold down the river by

11:30

their leadership and their leadership

11:32

should endorse Trump the reason is

11:34

you're going to have Choice like in

11:36

school I want school choice I also want

11:38

choice for cars if somebody wants

11:40

gasoline if somebody wants all electric

11:42

they can do whatever they want but

11:44

they're destroying the consumer and

11:46

they're destroying the other workers the

11:48

Auto Workers will not have any jobs

11:50

Kristin because the all of these cars

11:52

are going to be made in China the

11:53

electric cars automatically are going to

11:55

be made in China Trump is not wrong

11:57

China makes a ton of electric vehicle

11:59

byd is probably one of the world's

12:02

largest Electric Vehicle Manufacturer

12:04

and hybrid manufacturer Toyota has been

12:06

a big hybrid manufacturer they're

12:08

finally transitioning into electric

12:09

vehicles we know that China is the

12:12

biggest export market for Tesla vehicles

12:14

in other words they make them in China

12:16

and they export them across the world we

12:18

know China is critical for battery

12:20

production but In fairness we do also

12:22

manufacture a lot probably somewhere

12:25

around 40 percent of Tesla's in

12:29

California and Texas and now we're

12:31

starting to produce them in Germany as

12:33

well so it's not only China but Donald

12:35

Trump does have some point here a lot of

12:38

electric vehicles are coming from China

12:39

I do find it interesting this tone from

12:42

Trump is a little softer on the electric

12:44

vehicle bashing that he was doing during

12:47

the Tucker Trump interview where he

12:49

argued that electric vehicles had bad

12:51

range he's walked away from the idea of

12:54

bashing the electric vehicles and now

12:56

says hey if you want electric you can

12:58

have it if you want yes you can have it

13:00

change of tune probably smart on the

13:03

topic of Donald Trump Donald Trump just

13:05

responded to the idea that Kevin

13:07

McCarthy and Republicans could end up

13:10

facing another government a shutdown

13:12

thanks to once again hitting a budget

13:15

negotiation stalemate where Donald Trump

13:17

argues that if we don't get a fair deal

13:20

we should walk away from the negotiating

13:22

table and let a shutdown happen remember

13:25

during the Trump Administration Donald

13:27

Trump was not afraid to let a government

13:30

shutdown actually happen to make sure he

13:33

got the concessions he was looking for

13:35

here's Donald I am proud to shut down

13:38

the government for border security Chuck

13:40

I will take the mantle I will be the one

13:42

to shut it down I'm not going to blame

13:44

you for it and now the president is no

13:46

longer willing to sign that short-term

13:48

funding bill and keep the government

13:49

open he wants his wall it's very

13:53

important that we have great border

13:54

security I think it's going to be over

13:55

with sooner than people think

13:57

but I will do whatever we have to do if

14:00

we have to stay out for a very long

14:01

period of time we're going to do that

14:03

and many of those people maybe even most

14:05

of those people that really have not

14:08

been and will not be getting their money

14:10

in at this moment those people in many

14:13

cases are the biggest fan of what we're

14:15

doing how do you know that all right uh

14:17

please major go ahead in case you don't

14:19

remember Donald Trump did end up getting

14:20

the whole government shut down to make

14:22

sure he got what he wanted but let's now

14:24

listen to what Donald Trump just said

14:26

about abortion since this is actually a

14:28

big deal to a lot of Americans I think

14:30

and I think they're all going to like me

14:32

I think both stars are going to like me

14:33

let me let me have to happen is you're

14:36

going to have to get this question

14:37

you're asking me a question what's going

14:39

to happen is you're going to come up

14:40

with a number of weeks or months you're

14:43

going to come up with a number that's

14:45

going to make people happy because 92

14:49

percent of the Democrats don't want to

14:51

see abortion after a certain period of

14:53

time why does smart response notice what

14:56

Trump does he Dodges the commitment to a

15:00

number of weeks in which an abortion

15:03

would be acceptable this really appeals

15:06

to evangelicals who say basically no

15:09

abortion ever essentially with the

15:11

exception of maybe maybe certain

15:15

circumstances where there's a threat to

15:16

the life of the mother or it also could

15:20

appeal to those who say oh you know okay

15:22

well maybe you an abortion is reasonable

15:24

up to a certain period of time Donald

15:27

Trump really playing it in the middle

15:28

here trying to appeal to both sides if a

15:32

federal ban landed on your desk if you

15:35

were re-elected would you sign it at 15.

15:37

are you talking about a complete ban a

15:39

ban at 15 weeks well people people are

15:43

starting to think of 15 weeks that seems

15:45

to be a number that people are talking

15:47

about right now would you sign that I

15:49

would I would sit down with both sides

15:51

and I'd negotiate something and we'll

15:54

end up with peace in that issue for the

15:56

first time in 52 years I'm not going to

15:58

say I would or I wouldn't I mean to

16:00

Sanctus was willing to sign a five-week

16:03

and six week would you support that you

16:05

think that I think what he did is a

16:06

terrible thing and a terrible mistake

16:08

but we'll come up with a number but at

16:11

the same time Democrats won't be able to

16:13

go out in six months seven months eight

16:15

months and allow an abortion and his

16:16

argument is really I'm gonna get it done

16:18

and it's going to get done we're going

16:20

to have a negotiation by bringing both

16:22

those on the left and the right together

16:23

and finding a middle ground and frankly

16:26

maybe Donald Trump is right here maybe

16:28

Americans in total aren't actually that

16:31

far apart on abortion especially since

16:34

we know that most on the left are not

16:38

okay with abortions Beyond about 20 24

16:41

weeks and besides that only about one

16:43

percent of abortions happen past 20

16:45

weeks anyway so most of the debate 99 of

16:48

the debate of abortions has to do with

16:50

the pre-20 week period so then we have

16:53

to ask ourselves okay is it five weeks

16:56

is it 10 weeks is it 15 weeks is it 20

16:58

weeks is it no abortions ever is it

17:00

abortions with exceptions Donald Trump

17:02

is taking a very interesting point of

17:03

view here by saying I'll get to the

17:05

bottom of it by bringing everybody

17:06

together and finding a happy middle

17:08

ground

17:09

I don't know that there are a lot of

17:11

Americans who could disagree with that

17:13

with the exception of course of

17:15

evangelicals who generally say no

17:17

abortion at all with the exception of

17:19

maybe risk the life of the mother but no

17:21

matter where you stand on the issue of

17:22

abortion it's obviously a very heated

17:24

issue that's why it hasn't been solved

17:26

it's been turned back to the States it's

17:28

worth noting how Donald Trump turns this

17:30

right back to what Americans want to

17:31

focus on which is we got it done

17:33

something is going to happen it's going

17:36

to be a number of weeks something's

17:38

going to happen

17:39

where the both sides are going to be

17:41

able to come together and then we'll be

17:43

able to go on to other things like the

17:46

economy our military Donald Trump was

17:49

then asked if he would consider running

17:50

for a third term which we know is not

17:53

constitutionally permitted and he made

17:55

it clear that no he's not trying to

17:57

latch onto power for another third term

17:59

even though some Democrats are arguing

18:02

he's gonna get in he's gonna try to make

18:03

himself a king a lot of this follows

18:06

Rachel maddows sort of argument that

18:09

Donald Trump will get in and make all

18:11

the rules change so that he can never be

18:13

dethroned again is that for life that he

18:16

gets to be president will we keep having

18:18

more elections or no

18:21

if every election is a new opportunity

18:23

for him to go to prison do you think he

18:24

allows us to have new elections

18:26

I mean if those are the stakes if

18:28

winning the election is his plan to stay

18:30

out of prison what happens in that

18:32

election if and when he does not win it

18:34

I mean if Trump and his supporters see

18:36

the stakes as losing and going to prison

18:38

or winning and being president and

18:40

probably president for life

18:42

how should we expect that he and the

18:44

Republican party and Republican

18:45

officials in swing states are going to

18:47

handle the conduct of that election that

18:50

Trump may very well lose that is an

18:53

argument that you hear some make others

18:55

say this is ludicrous he's coming in for

18:57

another term potentially or likely and

18:59

that's it let him have his term if he is

19:02

so rightfully elected now at the same

19:04

time in California you have Democrats

19:07

posturing and actually requesting the

19:09

California attorney general to have

19:12

Donald Trump remove from the ballot in

19:15

California citing the 14th Amendment

19:18

this is a way of suggesting that because

19:20

of j6 Donald Trump would be ineligible

19:23

to appear as a candidate for president

19:26

obviously you have those on the left who

19:29

say hell yeah get them off the ballot

19:32

and then of course you have those on the

19:33

right who say

19:35

can we just let people decide and let

19:39

the voters make the decision and let the

19:42

court of public opinion decide to the

19:44

extent of which we have free and fair

19:46

elections Apple phone lead times here

19:49

exploding unclear whether these are

19:51

because of supply chain constraints or

19:53

just massive demand look at this the

19:55

white titanium and natural titanium

19:58

taking a large lag time of almost two

20:01

months 59 days here in the United States

20:03

similar in China by the way look at that

20:05

the Japanese the Chinese the Americans

20:08

the Brits the Indians those in Hong Kong

20:11

everyone's sort of like hey we kind of

20:13

like the White and the natural titanium

20:15

better than the black and blue Titanium

20:18

with just a little over a month of lead

20:21

time at least in America this is all

20:23

thanks to Goldman Sachs suggesting that

20:25

the iPhone 15 pro and pro Max are seeing

20:27

the longest lead times across regions

20:30

while the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 plus

20:33

are generally seeing more normal lead

20:35

times so once again the iPhone 15 pro

20:38

and pro Max kicking but in terms of lead

20:41

times it does indicate a positive level

20:45

of consumer demand and an increasing

20:47

price slash mix for Apple which means

20:50

higher margins potentially higher

20:52

profits again with little transparency

20:55

into Supply which could also be skewing

20:59

some of these lead times in other words

21:00

if you have artificially low Supply you

21:03

could end up in a situation where it

21:04

seems like there's more demand for the

21:06

phones than there really is I wanted to

21:09

dive a bit deeper into this and I looked

21:11

up Nordic semiconductor Nordic

21:14

semiconductor does a lot of work for

21:18

Bluetooth and Wi-Fi in battery powered

21:22

devices there was a general slowdown in

21:26

demand as well as basically excess

21:30

inventory that led to less needs for

21:33

Bluetooth and Wi-Fi however these

21:36

devices aren't necessarily in the iPhone

21:38

they're usually used for home kit

21:40

devices or find my devices NFC related

21:44

devices so really you might not end up

21:47

being able to determine iPhone demand

21:49

from any Source you kind of just have to

21:52

look and go wow if you missed the order

21:54

window by 30 minutes you would have

21:56

ended up going from being able to

21:58

receive your iPhone if you ordered at

22:00

the moment pre-orders opened up which

22:03

was a 5 am a Pacific Standard time you

22:05

would have gotten it within a week that

22:07

following Friday which is just in a few

22:08

days if you woke up just 30 minutes

22:10

later you would have already been pushed

22:12

back three weeks so the question is is

22:16

there a supply chain constraint or are

22:18

we over supply chain constraints and is

22:21

demand for this iPhone really that

22:23

incredible well Goldman Sachs goes as

22:25

far as arguing one of the big reasons we

22:27

could be seeing the demand that we are

22:29

is because of well incentives from

22:32

carriers and massive carrier promo

22:35

emotions with ATT and T-Mobile and

22:38

Verizon offering anywhere between eight

22:40

hundred to a thousand dollars now they

22:42

do require in many cases the most

22:44

expensive 5G plans and service data

22:47

plans to really try to squeeze that

22:50

profit right back out of you these

22:52

companies are offering pretty

22:54

substantial promotions to get new

22:57

customers keep in mind something that I

22:59

like to do with my Apple devices is I

23:01

actually like to have two carriers on

23:03

one device so that way I can switch

23:05

between like a t or T-Mobile but if

23:08

you're gonna go between ATT T-Mobile go

23:10

for like ATT maybe for the 800-ish or a

23:14

thousand dollars off and then get like a

23:16

mint mobile because they just use

23:18

deprioritized T-Mobile bands which

23:20

de-prioritize sounds so bad but honestly

23:23

99 of the time they're good anyway and

23:25

the other time just use the ATT bands

23:27

okay but that's like hack if you wanna

23:29

you know instead of spending 75 maybe a

23:31

month and 75 a month which is 150 bucks

23:34

just spend 75.5 15 now you're a 90 and

23:37

you have two phone numbers and two

23:39

Services instead of just one on Deck is

23:42

the instacart IPO expected to hit for

23:45

thirty dollars per share they were

23:47

targeting 27 to 30 dollars per share

23:50

they're going to end up hitting likely

23:52

at that upper end around 30 bucks keep

23:55

in mind the arm IPO hit for about 59

23:57

bucks and ended up at about 58 dollars

24:00

in the last trading session though that

24:03

initial 59 was up about 17 to 20 percent

24:07

from where they were originally targeted

24:09

to be that doesn't mean card is going to

24:11

have a similar outcome keep in mind much

24:14

like the arm IPO the amount of float and

24:16

lock-ups that you're getting

24:18

ah they're not the best for probably a

24:21

long-term hodlers consider some of the

24:24

following details of the shares that

24:27

will be issued the public float of 14.1

24:31

million shares you can expect

24:33

potentially up to

24:35

56.2 million more shares to end up being

24:38

issued in the form of non-voting stock

24:41

that could be issued via existing

24:43

options or restricted stock units which

24:46

are basically employee compensation or

24:48

other 2023 Equity incentive plans which

24:50

is all just fancy English for saying the

24:53

float that exists for instacart may end

24:56

up for Xing over the next few years keep

25:01

this in mind also keep in mind that

25:03

existing stockholders will continue to

25:05

own about 95 percent of the company new

25:08

investors via this IPO will only own

25:10

about five percent of the company it's a

25:13

pretty small number the company is cash

25:16

flow positive for the six months ended

25:18

July 30th 2023 they had 242 million

25:21

dollars of cash flow 220 million dollars

25:24

of free cash flow and then income

25:26

matched at 242 million this is great

25:29

because it's definitely a turn from the

25:32

lack of profitability they've had in

25:33

Prior years especially during covid

25:35

although for the full year end of 2022

25:38

they did end up with 428 million dollars

25:41

of profit and the 2023 numbers they

25:45

don't actually look that bad gross

25:47

profit there are about 75 percent net

25:50

profit they're only at about 16 that's

25:52

because they spend a lot on Research

25:54

development and sales but get this

25:57

Revenue grew 31 in the last six months

26:01

compared to the prior six months and

26:03

they only increased sales and marketing

26:05

by three percent you're still paying

26:08

about 50 times earnings for this company

26:11

at 30 bucks a share 60 cents annualized

26:14

for earnings it's about 50 times

26:16

earnings so it's not bad if you you can

26:19

continue to grow hopefully the bottom

26:21

line the tune of 25 30 percent puts you

26:24

somewhere around a two Peg it's actually

26:27

not horribly unrealistic however there

26:30

are some big risk factors and in my

26:32

opinion those are the fact that only

26:33

five percent of the company is going to

26:35

be owned by new shareholders insiders

26:37

are likely to dump there are a lot of

26:40

shares coming out just like an arm I

26:43

actually think instacart has less

26:44

uncertainty than arm does because you

26:46

don't have to worry about armed China

26:47

but you also have competition I mean

26:49

instacart fairly says that right now

26:52

only about 12 percent of grocery sales

26:55

are online this is despite the fact that

26:57

instacart has 7.7 million monthly active

27:00

users over 5500 Brands and really

27:03

there's hope that instacart is going to

27:05

be in a lot more stores in the future

27:07

but if there's competition or stores are

27:10

reluctant you could end up getting some

27:13

resistance to seeing numbers actually

27:14

grow at instacart instacart is also

27:17

pitching that they offer AI powered

27:19

shopping carts which lead to potentially

27:21

15 percent more sales by basically

27:24

targeting people's preferences via

27:27

advertisements

27:28

and trying to use AI to profit more

27:30

money well it musk had some things to

27:32

say on Twitter over the last 24 hours a

27:35

first after the Wall Street Journal

27:36

published an article suggesting that

27:38

Elon Musk who's known for having a

27:40

potential contentious relationship with

27:43

the Saudis could potentially be in the

27:46

very early stage of maybe building a

27:52

Tesla gigafactory in Saudi Arabia well

27:56

Elon Musk ended up quoting this Wall

27:58

Street Journal article and saying it was

28:00

utterly false now this is entirely

28:03

possible because Elon Musk is also

28:06

meeting with country leaders across the

28:08

world from leaders in Indonesia to

28:10

Turkish leaders to literally riding

28:13

around the gigafactory with Israel's

28:16

netanyu and quite frankly probably don't

28:20

want the Wall Street Journal right on

28:22

the heels of you meeting Nathaniel

28:24

bitching how you're interested in doing

28:26

a deal with the Saudis probably not a

28:29

great look and maybe exactly why Elon

28:31

Musk right away started reposting more

28:34

pro-israel content on his Twitter right

28:37

after he replied to That Wall Street

28:39

Journal piece sounds to me like elon's

28:41

playing a game of politics but guess

28:43

what bottom line is he should be the

28:46

more he plays Politics the more money

28:48

he's gonna get for Tesla to end up

28:50

building factors wherever he damn well

28:52

pleases Tesla Model X has also seen its

28:55

delivery dates move back from being able

28:57

to get the vehicle between September and

28:59

October to October to November and now

29:03

to November and December implying that

29:05

the model X is once again becoming more

29:07

popular the model X being the seven seed

29:10

version that a lot of people like unless

29:12

you actually want to use the trunk I

29:14

know that because I own a seven seat

29:16

model X it's a great vehicle but just

29:18

don't expect to use the trunk if you

29:20

have all seven seats out I'd probably if

29:22

I bought it again go for the six seat

29:25

especially since those back two in the

29:27

seven seater version

29:28

not that comfy or spacious I'd rather go

29:32

for the six seat version so you actually

29:35

have functional seats that's just my

29:37

free opinion Elon Musk also argues that

29:40

Tucker Carlson no matter how you count

29:43

it is getting a lot more views on

29:45

Twitter that's because people are

29:48

throwing up screenshots and showing that

29:50

Tucker Carlson's Trump interview got 265

29:54

million impressions on Twitter versus

29:57

the average nightly viewership that

30:00

Tucker Carlson got on Fox news of about

30:02

3 million now it's worth noting that the

30:06

Donald Trump Tucker Carlson interview is

30:08

not an average nightly interview so In

30:10

fairness if you look at average Tucker

30:13

Carlson views per video he's probably

30:16

somewhere closer to 50 to 100 million

30:18

impressions on Twitter versus the 3

30:21

million views he would get on Fox so

30:24

obviously we can argue that fox is

30:26

probably rigging maybe even how they can

30:28

via Nielsen view counts how they come up

30:31

with three million but usually what you

30:33

do is you take an average of 50 to 100

30:36

million impressions on Twitter and you

30:38

generally divide it by about a third to

30:40

about a fourth that would bring you down

30:42

to somewhere around 12 and a half to 25

30:44

million views which is still four to

30:47

eight x what Tucker Carlson averaged on

30:48

Fox

30:49

now Tucker's probably also posting four

30:52

to x times Less on Twitter because he's

30:56

not posting every single night new video

30:58

content like he was Monday through

31:00

Friday back when he was on Fox

31:02

Twitter in my opinion is also a much

31:05

more accessible platform versus having

31:08

to have cable TV to watch Fox or some

31:11

kind of other digital like DirecTV

31:13

subscription and then purposely going

31:15

into Fox to view Tucker Carlson which is

31:19

something you could easily do now while

31:21

still having a cut cord through like

31:22

again DirecTV they make it pretty easy

31:24

to kind of DVR everything like I have a

31:27

t and which is harder you know they own

31:29

DirecTV now and they let you have

31:31

unlimited DVR this is not sponsored at

31:34

all just to be saying like I think it's

31:35

kind of cool because then I go oh I

31:36

missed you know what that person said

31:38

and I can go click and go back and like

31:40

oh there it is great now let's listen to

31:42

Kathy Wood and her argument on Tesla

31:45

keep in mind she's going to talk about

31:47

one-third two-third that is of Tesla

31:50

revenues what are they getting now are

31:53

they getting the one-third now are they

31:54

getting the two third now and what could

31:57

that mean if today we're getting one

31:59

third when are we gonna get the two

32:02

thirds as Tesla investors let's listen

32:04

in what assumptions are made about its

32:07

business to get to that 1400 by 27

32:10

number

32:12

well about a third of our evaluation is

32:15

associated with electric vehicles EVs

32:18

and scaling them and as as you mentioned

32:22

turkey a plant there uh you know many

32:25

countries do want a Tesla plant because

32:28

is this is the new world right so that's

32:31

good this is all working out and then

32:34

the then two-thirds of our valuation is

32:37

around autonomous and autonomous taxi

32:41

platforms we think Tesla is in the pole

32:45

position here in the United States it

32:47

has collected more data about our roads

32:50

and actually other roads around the

32:52

world uh then all of the other companies

32:57

combined and therefore it has more

32:58

Corner cases and probably will be the

33:02

company that will get people from point

33:04

A to point B as quickly and safely as

33:08

possible so it's a winner take most

33:10

Market uh so whether it's our base case

33:13

uh it just that just means okay

33:16

autonomous uh perhaps takes a little

33:19

longer to play out uh or the bull case

33:23

it happens much more quickly

33:25

so even the the if it takes longer to

33:28

play out it's still 1400.

33:31

um and and that sort of that seems

33:33

extremely optimistic in terms of even

33:35

the regulatory

33:37

um green lights that Tesla would need

33:39

for autonomy it seems also you know that

33:41

the model where Tesla owners would own

33:43

their cars and then they would go out

33:45

and earn them money during the day by

33:47

driving people around that also seems

33:49

sort of optimistic in terms of the

33:52

uptake of that Kathy so you know for

33:55

two-thirds of the valuation do you feel

33:56

like that there's risk even around the

33:58

bear case at all with the two-thirds

34:01

well

34:03

um actually the risks are going down

34:05

because Regulators are very data driven

34:08

and what Regulators have been

34:11

experiencing especially in the

34:13

transportation sector is that the number

34:17

of auto deaths in the United States have

34:21

gone up has gone up during the past five

34:25

to ten years from thirty thousand to

34:28

forty five thousand after Decades of

34:31

falling thanks to Auto safety measures

34:33

so the national highway and

34:36

Transportation safety board and other

34:38

Transportation authorities want to turn

34:42

that Trend back down why has it happened

34:44

a lot of it is because of texting and

34:49

therefore a disproportionate number of

34:51

young people are dying in auto accidents

34:55

so the data supports what Tesla is doing

34:59

80 to ninety percent of all accidents on

35:05

the roads are caused by human error if

35:07

you take the human being out of the

35:10

equation

35:11

and and use AI to get people from point

35:16

A to point B as safely as quickly as

35:18

possible

35:20

um I think the the the authorities The

35:23

Regulators are going to be persuaded by

35:26

the data in fact they already have been

35:29

in terms of the fatalities in uh in

35:32

Tesla's cars they examine them they say

35:34

not Tesla's fault for the most part and

35:37

oh by the way uh people driving in Tesla

35:40

cars are 40 plus safer uh with autopilot

35:45

and FSD than in other cars nothing

35:48

absolutely Nails it here remember that

35:50

when Regulators found out that Elon Musk

35:53

had an Elon mode that basically let you

35:55

override having the nudge on the

35:57

steering wheel when you're on autopilot

35:59

which is just a way of saying you don't

36:01

don't have to engage the steering wheel

36:02

at all rather than Regulators shutting

36:05

Elon down and punishing Elon and Tesla

36:08

they said hey we want to know who has

36:11

this how do you enable it

36:13

and would you learn like we're curious

36:15

what what did you learn from not having

36:17

the nudge was was it safer was it better

36:21

hello this is The Regulators actually

36:24

doing what Kathy is highlighting The

36:26

Regulators are going

36:28

we we're not opposed to this if it's

36:31

better we we want to know we're data

36:34

driven here which I know saying

36:36

government and data driven in the same

36:37

sentence is like oh my gosh what are you

36:39

a Democrat let's try to put the politics

36:41

aside for a moment okay now if you want

36:44

to see some wild charts that consider

36:45

the following if you were told that hey

36:49

you could invest in a vaccine company

36:52

that would end up being extremely

36:54

popular during the pandemic do you think

36:57

that vaccine company would have actually

36:59

outperformed the S P 500 well if you

37:02

stack it up over well

37:04

the last year the answer is no last five

37:06

years the answer is no last over 20

37:09

years the answer is no throw in the

37:11

NASDAQ the answer is no as well and if

37:14

you now really want to see what

37:16

outperformed just throw in apple

37:20

yeah

37:22

ouch

37:22

it kind of goes to show that sometimes

37:25

investing in the right innovation of

37:27

right stock can outperform but boy that

37:31

could also end up being a lottery to try

37:33

to hit Apple that early on public sector

37:36

jobs are up 327

37:39

000 in 2023 alone according to the

37:41

Bureau of Labor Statistics that actually

37:43

accounts for one-fifth one in five of

37:46

every jobs created coming to you from

37:49

the government this is also usually

37:51

deemed to be a late stage indicator also

37:55

known as counter-cyclical in other words

37:57

when the economy goes into a

37:59

recessionary environment private

38:01

companies are less aggressive at hiring

38:03

individuals and this is when public jobs

38:06

potentially with more stability

38:08

reasonable hours and a sense of purpose

38:10

can step in and encourage people to go

38:12

for public sector work

38:15

now more private workforces are pausing

38:19

their hiring maybe even undergoing quiet

38:22

layoffs leading to more desirability for

38:25

public work again

38:27

potentially indicating a recession could

38:30

be here or near Mark Cuban is getting

38:32

heat for saying back in 2021 quote if

38:36

you work for me I require my employees

38:38

to be vaccinated unless there's a

38:40

doctor's reason why you can't be now

38:42

there are some messages from telegram

38:43

circulating that suggests when you get

38:46

vaccinated and tell others to do the

38:48

same all come on your podcast my choice

38:51

not to support people who haven't been

38:53

vaccinated this is a very much in

38:56

contrast to something like what a Vivek

38:59

aramiswami says who even though him and

39:02

his wife have differing opinions makes

39:05

potentially quite a reasonable argument

39:07

that a lot of people relate with today

39:08

the vague argues that he regrets taking

39:11

the covet vaccine and says if he had the

39:14

facts he had now would not have gotten

39:16

vaccinated and many probably agree with

39:19

that his wife on the other hand who

39:21

works with a lot of cancer patients

39:23

given that she's a laryngologist

39:26

something that having to do with like

39:28

swallowing and voice disorders but

39:29

anyway she deals with a lot of folks who

39:31

have undergone treatment for cancer

39:33

which is absolutely terrible knock on

39:34

wood nobody watching ever has to deal

39:36

with this it's absolutely horrible but

39:38

anyway she says she felt she had a

39:39

responsibility to have a vaccine because

39:41

of the patients she was around and this

39:43

sounds quite reasonable now just as sort

39:45

of a throwback back to my campaign for

39:47

governor in California take a listen to

39:49

this clip where I talk about the

39:51

constitutional right for a business to

39:53

determine their own rules around whether

39:56

or not they would require mandates and

39:59

this was in response to a question as to

40:01

whether or not I supported Gavin

40:02

newsom's mandates my opinion was clear I

40:06

was a big fan of individual choice and

40:10

business Choice path for ath agrees with

40:12

all the Republicans on stage in opposing

40:14

Governor newsom's vaccine and mask

40:16

mandates I believe every individual

40:19

business has the constitutional right

40:20

and every individual building has the

40:22

right to determine their own mandate

40:24

rules now let's talk about housing

40:26

having hit a wall and it's not just talk

40:28

it's literally what I'm starting to see

40:30

and it's spreading much like a covid

40:33

virus it's really bizarre and kind of

40:36

freaky it's something to pay attention

40:37

to and I'll tell you we are just

40:40

drooling at house hack for the

40:43

opportunity to buy even cheaper deals

40:45

we're expecting to buy about a hundred

40:48

unlivable fixed roppers and we can't

40:51

wait to go shopping here's where we're

40:53

finding weakness and where some pain

40:55

just hit the wall first of all Oregon's

40:58

been weak like all freaking year long

41:00

Boise's been pretty weak as well Austin

41:03

started booming though in Texas between

41:05

the beginning of the year and about July

41:08

but guess what over the last two months

41:11

the Austin Market based on what we're

41:13

seeing on the ground working with

41:14

Realtors has hit a wall this means we're

41:17

putting a pause on taxes until maybe we

41:21

hit a bottom closer to late October

41:24

November we're watching the data we're

41:26

going to be data driven on this but boy

41:28

some markets are hitting more of a wall

41:30

than others let me give you another

41:32

example we verbally floated an idea that

41:36

hey maybe we'd be willing to be at about

41:38

470 000 on a certain property in an area

41:42

where we started to see the market term

41:43

then we decided you know what Market's

41:46

turning in this area we're gonna wait

41:48

and let it bottom out a little bit first

41:50

seller calls us and says hey look you

41:53

were at 470. I I can't go all the way

41:56

down to where you want would you

41:57

consider 460 no would you consider 450

42:00

no okay then they let a couple days go

42:03

by how about 4 30. no and then they're

42:07

like okay okay okay we we know you've

42:10

wanted to be at 420 that's what you

42:12

floated to us after you kind of

42:14

initially were floating around 470

42:16

you're like maybe you'd be convinced at

42:18

4 20. how about we go for 420. and then

42:21

I'm like yeah that's how I felt a few

42:22

days ago now I don't feel like that

42:24

anymore and they're like oh

42:27

for me it's actually this perfect

42:30

experiment into what's going on in the

42:31

market because that's how I know what

42:34

competition there is if they keep

42:36

calling me back the competition just

42:38

vanished and that is different we did

42:41

not see that in July we have not seen

42:43

that anywhere throughout the year we

42:45

didn't really see it in August with the

42:47

exception of certain parts of the

42:50

country and now we're starting to see it

42:52

more and more now that we're in

42:53

September my guess is as I've been

42:56

saying for over a year and a half Q3 Q4

43:00

2023 is going to be where the party is

43:03

and I have a feeling the party's just

43:05

getting started so buckle up for a

43:08

roller coaster there's some

43:10

opportunities coming up How's that gonna

43:12

go make some money by the way stay tuned

43:15

because we've got some big announcements

43:16

coming for house hack on China Xi

43:18

Jinping snub Joe Biden last week in

43:21

favor of Biden just meeting with the

43:23

Prime Minister of China big slap in the

43:25

face and we gotta pay attention to

43:27

Country Garden this is China's largest

43:30

privately run property developer it's in

43:33

big financial distress and could be a

43:35

bigger crisis than ever Grant 2021's

43:38

default that could lead to some

43:41

disinflation as it continues to

43:43

contribute to the contraction of the

43:45

Chinese economy although so far oil

43:48

prices rising to now 95 bucks a barrel

43:51

of crude for Brent not so great for the

43:54

disinflation narrative but it is a pro

43:58

tightening Financial conditions

44:00

narrative which could lead the FED to

44:02

pause but definitely could end up

44:04

causing some inflation straight through

44:08

higher oil and energy prices not great

44:11

but this country garden issue big deal

44:14

and given that a lot of Chinese

44:17

households have lost faith in housing as

44:20

a safe investment you could end up

44:22

seeing a renewed deepening of the real

44:25

estate crash in China since Country

44:28

Garden focuses a lot on the suburban

44:31

area and even rural areas you might end

44:34

up seeing a whole lot more pain than you

44:37

might otherwise see in areas where

44:39

people are really focused on wanting to

44:41

live which are

44:42

bigger cities in other words maybe more

44:45

stability in places like Shanghai and

44:47

Beijing which are deemed to be some of

44:50

the top tier investable property markets

44:52

and everything outside of these areas

44:54

not faring as well on top of this you've

44:57

got a pretty big piece from a

44:58

presidential candidate in Taiwan he's

45:00

also the mayor of Taipei the capital of

45:03

Taiwan and the biggest argument this

45:06

presidential candidate makes is that

45:08

Taiwan needs to build up its Western

45:10

Alliance and its military capabilities

45:12

to deter China from invading Taiwan

45:16

while at the same time showing that they

45:20

are willing to democratically talk with

45:22

China well unfortunately for Taiwan

45:25

China doesn't seem to want to care so

45:27

much about talking instead China's right

45:30

back to flexing China flew a record 103

45:33

warplanes near Taiwan marking the most

45:37

in Bloomberg compiled data going back

45:40

three years the China activity appears

45:44

to be in response to American visits

45:47

said Taiwan especially Arizona's

45:49

Governor Katie Hobbs as tsmc is building

45:52

a massive facility in Arizona just

45:56

outside of well it's actually within the

45:58

Phoenix area sort of towards the western

46:00

side of Phoenix Taiwan now reporting

46:02

that the Chinese military presence is

46:04

posing a serious security challenge to

46:07

Taiwan but Taiwan also really concerned

46:10

because they import the vast majority of

46:13

their energy over 90 percent and that

46:15

maybe they've got to focus on nuclear or

46:18

some form of homegrown energy to finally

46:21

be less dependent on outside sources

46:23

that could easily be cut off and crimped

46:25

by China some say this is more saber

46:28

rattling from China but also counter

46:30

Sable rattling from Taiwan so they can

46:33

get more support from America now I

46:35

promise to snip it from our Daily Wealth

46:37

emails and in today's Daily Wealth email

46:40

snippet we are going to talk about

46:41

work-life balance since basically in my

46:44

opinion there is no such thing as a work

46:46

life imbalance you have to enjoy what

46:48

you do because ultimately everything

46:50

that you're doing every single day is

46:52

part of your life and in my opinion it's

46:55

the quality of what you do that matters

46:56

not the nominal hours that you spend so

47:00

maximize quality and manage your

47:03

productivity rather than your time spend

47:06

focused quality hours on your journey to

47:10

success it's not about the time on paper

47:14

that counts in a balanced life for

47:16

example if I spend two or three days

47:19

crashing hard stud crash studying super

47:22

hard for a test to make sure I could

47:24

pass that Series 7 broker exam like I

47:26

did last week that's high quality Focus

47:29

time on passing that exam with almost no

47:31

family time and that seems really out of

47:34

balance but then when I pass guess what

47:36

I get to celebrate with my friends and

47:38

family uh now

47:41

yeah

47:42

I can now enjoy quality time building

47:45

Legos with my eight-year-old going on a

47:47

run with my children I could spend time

47:50

not only playing Luigi's Mansion with

47:52

them but riding go-karts with them or

47:54

going to Chuck E cheese with them and

47:56

that quality time is so much more

47:58

valuable because it is in contrast to

48:01

the hard work that I did to Succeed in

48:03

Business and now I can succeed with

48:06

family and it's that yin and yang that

48:09

actually makes me enjoy both work and

48:12

family why not advertise these things

48:14

that you told us here I feel like nobody

48:15

else knows about this we'll try a little

48:17

advertising and see how it goes

48:18

congratulations man you have done so

48:20

much people love you people look up to

48:22

you Kevin path right there financial

48:23

analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always

48:26

great to get your take

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.