Fed *Recession*, Trump LASH OUT, UAW Strike, Tesla & Housing Market Crash | Bottom Line Report [E.2]
FULL TRANSCRIPT
oh boy there's a lot to cover in today's
a bottom line report housing has hit a
wall the UAW could single-handedly push
us into recession will Donald Trump run
for a third term McDonald's could
collapse thanks to California and
instacart's IPO China Tesla and more
let's get started first McDonald's
assembly Bill 1228 in California just
past the state senate and heads to
newsom's desk for Signature who is
expected to sign it this will include a
wage a floor at 20 of per hour for every
chain with at least 60 locations wage
increases would take effect April 1st of
2024 and no that's not a joke that is
four dollars and fifty cents higher than
the state's minimum wage for working at
a fast food establishment the danger
here according to the National Owners
Association which represents franchise
owners is that each franchise could end
up experiencing around 200 fifty
thousand dollars more in costs and
suggests that many McDonald's may end up
having to close as they can't afford
this remember most of McDonald's profits
their corporate profits don't actually
come from selling you food they come
from selling you the brand and the real
estate via an owner who decides to
become an entrepreneur and run the
business as a franchise here it is
directly from McDonald's investor
relation statement on franchise Revenue
McDonald's brings in 84 profit margins
on the actual restaurants that
McDonald's operates they only bring in
16 profit in plain English that means
about 90 cents of every dollar of
operating income McDonald's has comes
from the franchise model not from
actually selling you food they sell the
stuff to entrepreneurs who run the
franchise those are the folks who are
going to have to pay the higher wages on
two the UAW who is also pushing for
higher wages the United Auto Workers
Union could literally push us into a
recession at least that's what Morgan
Stanley thinks take a look at this
research Oregon Stanley researchers just
outlined that at this point only and
this is a big only but a quote unquote
only 13
000 of the 146 000 union workers that
are part of the UAW are on strike but
Morgan Stanley argues the impact to
economic activity could be large if we
see a full scale strike that lasts for
some time the effect of the strike could
be visible in industrial production but
most importantly end up hitting GDP of
course this will end up hitting non-farm
payrolls if we end up seeing these
striking workers show up as unemployed
for a longer period of time and that
could really weaken the Biden
administration's claims that Biden
Comics are really working hard
especially since we would see a spike in
unemployment in other words we'd see the
unemployment rate rise and the number of
jobs created a fall but take a look at
this and this is quite important there
could be a noticeable fourth quarter
drag on gross domestic product if this
strike continues specifically consider
this comparison to 2019. in 2019 a
limited strike of quote 48
000 workers which then represented about
24 percent of vehicle production at the
time took place in mid-september and
lasted through October that's about six
weeks at the time we had to take about
0.4 percentage points off GDP for the
fourth quarter now though if the entire
146
000 union members of the UAW end up
striking which has been threatened the
impact could end up creating a full one
percentage Point hit to gross domestic
product in America well folks remember
when GDP goes negative for two quarters
in a row you're in a recession again we
had that q1 22 q22 we all felt that
whether that was technically a recession
or not whatever what's more important
though is going forward listen to this
her current forecast is for a just 0.1
percent fourth quarter GP read if you
subtract off of that one percent thanks
to a strike you could literally be
sitting at negative one percent for the
fourth quarter in
2023. now that's not expected to pull
the entire year into a recession but it
is absolutely expected to set up for a
recession with Q4 and q1 2024 combined
unless this strike resolves itself soon
others then are naturally arguing that
but if these these workers do end up
getting their 40 percent pay hikes they
would end up contributing to inflation
which would be bad for the Federal
Reserve however Morgan Stanley disagrees
with this and they actually argue that
even if all 146 000 workers got the full
40 raise we would only see a at about
0.05 percent increase in average hourly
earnings over the next four years as a
bottom line bro it ain't gonna cause
inflation even if you give a pay bump to
all of these people but the strike could
lead to a recession and so what's the
latest on that negotiation the UAW
currently suggests that on Friday
September 22nd which is just a few days
away the next deadline will be struck
and then the big three could end up
facing even more strikes that is the UAW
would call on more individuals to stand
up and strike against what they call
corporate greed and specifically
executive greed with Executives facing
potentially per the UAW
wage increases of over 30 percent while
wages for workers have only gone up six
percent over the last four years despite
the fact that the average price of a car
is up 34 now this does somewhat
disregard the inflationary input costs
that have become more expensive to
produce vehicles but it does make it
clear that much like UPS it's probably
time for workers to get some form of a
pay bump so far companies like solantis
have offered a 21 pay increase but the
UAW so far says that's not enough and on
top of this we're now expected to
potentially see unions in Canada join
striking workers in America axios is
reporting we could see a 5100 worker
strike in Canada that would take all all
Ford workers and contribute to the
strike this is by the unifor union now
one thing that's been very misunderstood
is the average pay of actual UAW workers
Barons and the Wall Street Journal and a
lot of mainstream media sources have
been arguing that the UAW ends up paying
its workers around 66 dollars per hour
but most UAW workers throw their hands
up and say I wish I was getting paid 66
dollars per hour and it turns out the
mainstream media along with these
corporations are collecting together all
of the potential future benefits these
employees could earn from not only
health insurance but also potential
profit sharing benefits extrapolated
into the future and then calculated back
into their hourly earnings this is quite
deceptive because it makes it a lot
harder to compare how much individuals
are actually earning so I tried going to
some more on unbiased sources as much as
that as possible I thought one of the
easiest ways to do this was exploring
what zip recruiters suggest an average
UAW salary actually is which is about 25
dollars per hour or around fifty two
thousand seven hundred and seventy one
dollars a per year full-time employees
at the big three usually make a range of
between 18 to 32 dollars per hour
depending on seniority and those as the
UAW argues are wages that haven't kept
up with inflation it's also worth noting
that back in 2008 unions gave
substantial concessions to the big three
automakers because the automakers were
about to go bankrupt this is where Auto
Executives famously traveled to Congress
to ask for bailouts and private jets
wondering when they'd get bailouts and
Congress said you know what come up with
a better plan to prove that y'all ain't
going to go bankrupt anyway even after
we bail you out this has led others to
say this time is different and Congress
will bail out automakers this time
around for sure and this is all just a
political ploy to get more stimulus
money for the automakers but many are
saying there's no way in hell any
stimulus money is coming out of Congress
for legacy automakers so good luck to
the Legacy autos because nothing
bipartisan is coming also it's worth
noting a lot of workers currently
working for the big three are now
considered temporary workers who earn a
lot less and receive a lot less in
profit sharing benefits in fact
potentially no profit sharing benefits
making usually around 1578 to 1928 an
hour this is a far cry from the 66
dollars per hour some of the mainstream
Outlets are suggesting that workers at
the UAW are actually earning this is
because of the common number of 66
dollars per hour which again includes
all those future benefits being thrown
around in the media and then folks are
wondering why are the these union
workers on strike as a result we now
have union workers responding going well
I wish I made 66 dollars an hour here's
an example 38 year old GM veteran making
about 32 dollars an hour at a warehouse
Distributing parts to repair already
sold GM vehicles argues that newer
workers end up starting at 17 bucks an
hour they usually top out at around 25
an hour and he feels honored that he
makes 32 dollars an hour either way you
slice it though this UAW strike could
potentially leave the Federal Reserve to
say you know what there is too much
uncertainty here we could be on the
brink or on the cusp of seeing a massive
amount of either layoffs or unemployment
claims due to these strikes and a real
hit to GDP in which case we are better
off pausing to wait and see what happens
not only with the lagged effects of
monetary policy but also with this UAW
strike in fact institutions across us
Wall Street are now arguing it is
impossible for the FED to know what kind
of impact these UAW strikes are going to
end up having on our American economy
this is a big deal when Donald Trump was
asked about these strikes his response
was the Auto Workers are not going to
have any jobs when you come right down
to it because if you take a look at what
they're doing with electric cars
electric cars are going to be made in
China the Auto Workers are not going to
have any I'll tell you what the Auto
Workers are being sold down the river by
their leadership and their leadership
should endorse Trump the reason is
you're going to have Choice like in
school I want school choice I also want
choice for cars if somebody wants
gasoline if somebody wants all electric
they can do whatever they want but
they're destroying the consumer and
they're destroying the other workers the
Auto Workers will not have any jobs
Kristin because the all of these cars
are going to be made in China the
electric cars automatically are going to
be made in China Trump is not wrong
China makes a ton of electric vehicle
byd is probably one of the world's
largest Electric Vehicle Manufacturer
and hybrid manufacturer Toyota has been
a big hybrid manufacturer they're
finally transitioning into electric
vehicles we know that China is the
biggest export market for Tesla vehicles
in other words they make them in China
and they export them across the world we
know China is critical for battery
production but In fairness we do also
manufacture a lot probably somewhere
around 40 percent of Tesla's in
California and Texas and now we're
starting to produce them in Germany as
well so it's not only China but Donald
Trump does have some point here a lot of
electric vehicles are coming from China
I do find it interesting this tone from
Trump is a little softer on the electric
vehicle bashing that he was doing during
the Tucker Trump interview where he
argued that electric vehicles had bad
range he's walked away from the idea of
bashing the electric vehicles and now
says hey if you want electric you can
have it if you want yes you can have it
change of tune probably smart on the
topic of Donald Trump Donald Trump just
responded to the idea that Kevin
McCarthy and Republicans could end up
facing another government a shutdown
thanks to once again hitting a budget
negotiation stalemate where Donald Trump
argues that if we don't get a fair deal
we should walk away from the negotiating
table and let a shutdown happen remember
during the Trump Administration Donald
Trump was not afraid to let a government
shutdown actually happen to make sure he
got the concessions he was looking for
here's Donald I am proud to shut down
the government for border security Chuck
I will take the mantle I will be the one
to shut it down I'm not going to blame
you for it and now the president is no
longer willing to sign that short-term
funding bill and keep the government
open he wants his wall it's very
important that we have great border
security I think it's going to be over
with sooner than people think
but I will do whatever we have to do if
we have to stay out for a very long
period of time we're going to do that
and many of those people maybe even most
of those people that really have not
been and will not be getting their money
in at this moment those people in many
cases are the biggest fan of what we're
doing how do you know that all right uh
please major go ahead in case you don't
remember Donald Trump did end up getting
the whole government shut down to make
sure he got what he wanted but let's now
listen to what Donald Trump just said
about abortion since this is actually a
big deal to a lot of Americans I think
and I think they're all going to like me
I think both stars are going to like me
let me let me have to happen is you're
going to have to get this question
you're asking me a question what's going
to happen is you're going to come up
with a number of weeks or months you're
going to come up with a number that's
going to make people happy because 92
percent of the Democrats don't want to
see abortion after a certain period of
time why does smart response notice what
Trump does he Dodges the commitment to a
number of weeks in which an abortion
would be acceptable this really appeals
to evangelicals who say basically no
abortion ever essentially with the
exception of maybe maybe certain
circumstances where there's a threat to
the life of the mother or it also could
appeal to those who say oh you know okay
well maybe you an abortion is reasonable
up to a certain period of time Donald
Trump really playing it in the middle
here trying to appeal to both sides if a
federal ban landed on your desk if you
were re-elected would you sign it at 15.
are you talking about a complete ban a
ban at 15 weeks well people people are
starting to think of 15 weeks that seems
to be a number that people are talking
about right now would you sign that I
would I would sit down with both sides
and I'd negotiate something and we'll
end up with peace in that issue for the
first time in 52 years I'm not going to
say I would or I wouldn't I mean to
Sanctus was willing to sign a five-week
and six week would you support that you
think that I think what he did is a
terrible thing and a terrible mistake
but we'll come up with a number but at
the same time Democrats won't be able to
go out in six months seven months eight
months and allow an abortion and his
argument is really I'm gonna get it done
and it's going to get done we're going
to have a negotiation by bringing both
those on the left and the right together
and finding a middle ground and frankly
maybe Donald Trump is right here maybe
Americans in total aren't actually that
far apart on abortion especially since
we know that most on the left are not
okay with abortions Beyond about 20 24
weeks and besides that only about one
percent of abortions happen past 20
weeks anyway so most of the debate 99 of
the debate of abortions has to do with
the pre-20 week period so then we have
to ask ourselves okay is it five weeks
is it 10 weeks is it 15 weeks is it 20
weeks is it no abortions ever is it
abortions with exceptions Donald Trump
is taking a very interesting point of
view here by saying I'll get to the
bottom of it by bringing everybody
together and finding a happy middle
ground
I don't know that there are a lot of
Americans who could disagree with that
with the exception of course of
evangelicals who generally say no
abortion at all with the exception of
maybe risk the life of the mother but no
matter where you stand on the issue of
abortion it's obviously a very heated
issue that's why it hasn't been solved
it's been turned back to the States it's
worth noting how Donald Trump turns this
right back to what Americans want to
focus on which is we got it done
something is going to happen it's going
to be a number of weeks something's
going to happen
where the both sides are going to be
able to come together and then we'll be
able to go on to other things like the
economy our military Donald Trump was
then asked if he would consider running
for a third term which we know is not
constitutionally permitted and he made
it clear that no he's not trying to
latch onto power for another third term
even though some Democrats are arguing
he's gonna get in he's gonna try to make
himself a king a lot of this follows
Rachel maddows sort of argument that
Donald Trump will get in and make all
the rules change so that he can never be
dethroned again is that for life that he
gets to be president will we keep having
more elections or no
if every election is a new opportunity
for him to go to prison do you think he
allows us to have new elections
I mean if those are the stakes if
winning the election is his plan to stay
out of prison what happens in that
election if and when he does not win it
I mean if Trump and his supporters see
the stakes as losing and going to prison
or winning and being president and
probably president for life
how should we expect that he and the
Republican party and Republican
officials in swing states are going to
handle the conduct of that election that
Trump may very well lose that is an
argument that you hear some make others
say this is ludicrous he's coming in for
another term potentially or likely and
that's it let him have his term if he is
so rightfully elected now at the same
time in California you have Democrats
posturing and actually requesting the
California attorney general to have
Donald Trump remove from the ballot in
California citing the 14th Amendment
this is a way of suggesting that because
of j6 Donald Trump would be ineligible
to appear as a candidate for president
obviously you have those on the left who
say hell yeah get them off the ballot
and then of course you have those on the
right who say
can we just let people decide and let
the voters make the decision and let the
court of public opinion decide to the
extent of which we have free and fair
elections Apple phone lead times here
exploding unclear whether these are
because of supply chain constraints or
just massive demand look at this the
white titanium and natural titanium
taking a large lag time of almost two
months 59 days here in the United States
similar in China by the way look at that
the Japanese the Chinese the Americans
the Brits the Indians those in Hong Kong
everyone's sort of like hey we kind of
like the White and the natural titanium
better than the black and blue Titanium
with just a little over a month of lead
time at least in America this is all
thanks to Goldman Sachs suggesting that
the iPhone 15 pro and pro Max are seeing
the longest lead times across regions
while the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 plus
are generally seeing more normal lead
times so once again the iPhone 15 pro
and pro Max kicking but in terms of lead
times it does indicate a positive level
of consumer demand and an increasing
price slash mix for Apple which means
higher margins potentially higher
profits again with little transparency
into Supply which could also be skewing
some of these lead times in other words
if you have artificially low Supply you
could end up in a situation where it
seems like there's more demand for the
phones than there really is I wanted to
dive a bit deeper into this and I looked
up Nordic semiconductor Nordic
semiconductor does a lot of work for
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi in battery powered
devices there was a general slowdown in
demand as well as basically excess
inventory that led to less needs for
Bluetooth and Wi-Fi however these
devices aren't necessarily in the iPhone
they're usually used for home kit
devices or find my devices NFC related
devices so really you might not end up
being able to determine iPhone demand
from any Source you kind of just have to
look and go wow if you missed the order
window by 30 minutes you would have
ended up going from being able to
receive your iPhone if you ordered at
the moment pre-orders opened up which
was a 5 am a Pacific Standard time you
would have gotten it within a week that
following Friday which is just in a few
days if you woke up just 30 minutes
later you would have already been pushed
back three weeks so the question is is
there a supply chain constraint or are
we over supply chain constraints and is
demand for this iPhone really that
incredible well Goldman Sachs goes as
far as arguing one of the big reasons we
could be seeing the demand that we are
is because of well incentives from
carriers and massive carrier promo
emotions with ATT and T-Mobile and
Verizon offering anywhere between eight
hundred to a thousand dollars now they
do require in many cases the most
expensive 5G plans and service data
plans to really try to squeeze that
profit right back out of you these
companies are offering pretty
substantial promotions to get new
customers keep in mind something that I
like to do with my Apple devices is I
actually like to have two carriers on
one device so that way I can switch
between like a t or T-Mobile but if
you're gonna go between ATT T-Mobile go
for like ATT maybe for the 800-ish or a
thousand dollars off and then get like a
mint mobile because they just use
deprioritized T-Mobile bands which
de-prioritize sounds so bad but honestly
99 of the time they're good anyway and
the other time just use the ATT bands
okay but that's like hack if you wanna
you know instead of spending 75 maybe a
month and 75 a month which is 150 bucks
just spend 75.5 15 now you're a 90 and
you have two phone numbers and two
Services instead of just one on Deck is
the instacart IPO expected to hit for
thirty dollars per share they were
targeting 27 to 30 dollars per share
they're going to end up hitting likely
at that upper end around 30 bucks keep
in mind the arm IPO hit for about 59
bucks and ended up at about 58 dollars
in the last trading session though that
initial 59 was up about 17 to 20 percent
from where they were originally targeted
to be that doesn't mean card is going to
have a similar outcome keep in mind much
like the arm IPO the amount of float and
lock-ups that you're getting
ah they're not the best for probably a
long-term hodlers consider some of the
following details of the shares that
will be issued the public float of 14.1
million shares you can expect
potentially up to
56.2 million more shares to end up being
issued in the form of non-voting stock
that could be issued via existing
options or restricted stock units which
are basically employee compensation or
other 2023 Equity incentive plans which
is all just fancy English for saying the
float that exists for instacart may end
up for Xing over the next few years keep
this in mind also keep in mind that
existing stockholders will continue to
own about 95 percent of the company new
investors via this IPO will only own
about five percent of the company it's a
pretty small number the company is cash
flow positive for the six months ended
July 30th 2023 they had 242 million
dollars of cash flow 220 million dollars
of free cash flow and then income
matched at 242 million this is great
because it's definitely a turn from the
lack of profitability they've had in
Prior years especially during covid
although for the full year end of 2022
they did end up with 428 million dollars
of profit and the 2023 numbers they
don't actually look that bad gross
profit there are about 75 percent net
profit they're only at about 16 that's
because they spend a lot on Research
development and sales but get this
Revenue grew 31 in the last six months
compared to the prior six months and
they only increased sales and marketing
by three percent you're still paying
about 50 times earnings for this company
at 30 bucks a share 60 cents annualized
for earnings it's about 50 times
earnings so it's not bad if you you can
continue to grow hopefully the bottom
line the tune of 25 30 percent puts you
somewhere around a two Peg it's actually
not horribly unrealistic however there
are some big risk factors and in my
opinion those are the fact that only
five percent of the company is going to
be owned by new shareholders insiders
are likely to dump there are a lot of
shares coming out just like an arm I
actually think instacart has less
uncertainty than arm does because you
don't have to worry about armed China
but you also have competition I mean
instacart fairly says that right now
only about 12 percent of grocery sales
are online this is despite the fact that
instacart has 7.7 million monthly active
users over 5500 Brands and really
there's hope that instacart is going to
be in a lot more stores in the future
but if there's competition or stores are
reluctant you could end up getting some
resistance to seeing numbers actually
grow at instacart instacart is also
pitching that they offer AI powered
shopping carts which lead to potentially
15 percent more sales by basically
targeting people's preferences via
advertisements
and trying to use AI to profit more
money well it musk had some things to
say on Twitter over the last 24 hours a
first after the Wall Street Journal
published an article suggesting that
Elon Musk who's known for having a
potential contentious relationship with
the Saudis could potentially be in the
very early stage of maybe building a
Tesla gigafactory in Saudi Arabia well
Elon Musk ended up quoting this Wall
Street Journal article and saying it was
utterly false now this is entirely
possible because Elon Musk is also
meeting with country leaders across the
world from leaders in Indonesia to
Turkish leaders to literally riding
around the gigafactory with Israel's
netanyu and quite frankly probably don't
want the Wall Street Journal right on
the heels of you meeting Nathaniel
bitching how you're interested in doing
a deal with the Saudis probably not a
great look and maybe exactly why Elon
Musk right away started reposting more
pro-israel content on his Twitter right
after he replied to That Wall Street
Journal piece sounds to me like elon's
playing a game of politics but guess
what bottom line is he should be the
more he plays Politics the more money
he's gonna get for Tesla to end up
building factors wherever he damn well
pleases Tesla Model X has also seen its
delivery dates move back from being able
to get the vehicle between September and
October to October to November and now
to November and December implying that
the model X is once again becoming more
popular the model X being the seven seed
version that a lot of people like unless
you actually want to use the trunk I
know that because I own a seven seat
model X it's a great vehicle but just
don't expect to use the trunk if you
have all seven seats out I'd probably if
I bought it again go for the six seat
especially since those back two in the
seven seater version
not that comfy or spacious I'd rather go
for the six seat version so you actually
have functional seats that's just my
free opinion Elon Musk also argues that
Tucker Carlson no matter how you count
it is getting a lot more views on
Twitter that's because people are
throwing up screenshots and showing that
Tucker Carlson's Trump interview got 265
million impressions on Twitter versus
the average nightly viewership that
Tucker Carlson got on Fox news of about
3 million now it's worth noting that the
Donald Trump Tucker Carlson interview is
not an average nightly interview so In
fairness if you look at average Tucker
Carlson views per video he's probably
somewhere closer to 50 to 100 million
impressions on Twitter versus the 3
million views he would get on Fox so
obviously we can argue that fox is
probably rigging maybe even how they can
via Nielsen view counts how they come up
with three million but usually what you
do is you take an average of 50 to 100
million impressions on Twitter and you
generally divide it by about a third to
about a fourth that would bring you down
to somewhere around 12 and a half to 25
million views which is still four to
eight x what Tucker Carlson averaged on
Fox
now Tucker's probably also posting four
to x times Less on Twitter because he's
not posting every single night new video
content like he was Monday through
Friday back when he was on Fox
Twitter in my opinion is also a much
more accessible platform versus having
to have cable TV to watch Fox or some
kind of other digital like DirecTV
subscription and then purposely going
into Fox to view Tucker Carlson which is
something you could easily do now while
still having a cut cord through like
again DirecTV they make it pretty easy
to kind of DVR everything like I have a
t and which is harder you know they own
DirecTV now and they let you have
unlimited DVR this is not sponsored at
all just to be saying like I think it's
kind of cool because then I go oh I
missed you know what that person said
and I can go click and go back and like
oh there it is great now let's listen to
Kathy Wood and her argument on Tesla
keep in mind she's going to talk about
one-third two-third that is of Tesla
revenues what are they getting now are
they getting the one-third now are they
getting the two third now and what could
that mean if today we're getting one
third when are we gonna get the two
thirds as Tesla investors let's listen
in what assumptions are made about its
business to get to that 1400 by 27
number
well about a third of our evaluation is
associated with electric vehicles EVs
and scaling them and as as you mentioned
turkey a plant there uh you know many
countries do want a Tesla plant because
is this is the new world right so that's
good this is all working out and then
the then two-thirds of our valuation is
around autonomous and autonomous taxi
platforms we think Tesla is in the pole
position here in the United States it
has collected more data about our roads
and actually other roads around the
world uh then all of the other companies
combined and therefore it has more
Corner cases and probably will be the
company that will get people from point
A to point B as quickly and safely as
possible so it's a winner take most
Market uh so whether it's our base case
uh it just that just means okay
autonomous uh perhaps takes a little
longer to play out uh or the bull case
it happens much more quickly
so even the the if it takes longer to
play out it's still 1400.
um and and that sort of that seems
extremely optimistic in terms of even
the regulatory
um green lights that Tesla would need
for autonomy it seems also you know that
the model where Tesla owners would own
their cars and then they would go out
and earn them money during the day by
driving people around that also seems
sort of optimistic in terms of the
uptake of that Kathy so you know for
two-thirds of the valuation do you feel
like that there's risk even around the
bear case at all with the two-thirds
well
um actually the risks are going down
because Regulators are very data driven
and what Regulators have been
experiencing especially in the
transportation sector is that the number
of auto deaths in the United States have
gone up has gone up during the past five
to ten years from thirty thousand to
forty five thousand after Decades of
falling thanks to Auto safety measures
so the national highway and
Transportation safety board and other
Transportation authorities want to turn
that Trend back down why has it happened
a lot of it is because of texting and
therefore a disproportionate number of
young people are dying in auto accidents
so the data supports what Tesla is doing
80 to ninety percent of all accidents on
the roads are caused by human error if
you take the human being out of the
equation
and and use AI to get people from point
A to point B as safely as quickly as
possible
um I think the the the authorities The
Regulators are going to be persuaded by
the data in fact they already have been
in terms of the fatalities in uh in
Tesla's cars they examine them they say
not Tesla's fault for the most part and
oh by the way uh people driving in Tesla
cars are 40 plus safer uh with autopilot
and FSD than in other cars nothing
absolutely Nails it here remember that
when Regulators found out that Elon Musk
had an Elon mode that basically let you
override having the nudge on the
steering wheel when you're on autopilot
which is just a way of saying you don't
don't have to engage the steering wheel
at all rather than Regulators shutting
Elon down and punishing Elon and Tesla
they said hey we want to know who has
this how do you enable it
and would you learn like we're curious
what what did you learn from not having
the nudge was was it safer was it better
hello this is The Regulators actually
doing what Kathy is highlighting The
Regulators are going
we we're not opposed to this if it's
better we we want to know we're data
driven here which I know saying
government and data driven in the same
sentence is like oh my gosh what are you
a Democrat let's try to put the politics
aside for a moment okay now if you want
to see some wild charts that consider
the following if you were told that hey
you could invest in a vaccine company
that would end up being extremely
popular during the pandemic do you think
that vaccine company would have actually
outperformed the S P 500 well if you
stack it up over well
the last year the answer is no last five
years the answer is no last over 20
years the answer is no throw in the
NASDAQ the answer is no as well and if
you now really want to see what
outperformed just throw in apple
yeah
ouch
it kind of goes to show that sometimes
investing in the right innovation of
right stock can outperform but boy that
could also end up being a lottery to try
to hit Apple that early on public sector
jobs are up 327
000 in 2023 alone according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics that actually
accounts for one-fifth one in five of
every jobs created coming to you from
the government this is also usually
deemed to be a late stage indicator also
known as counter-cyclical in other words
when the economy goes into a
recessionary environment private
companies are less aggressive at hiring
individuals and this is when public jobs
potentially with more stability
reasonable hours and a sense of purpose
can step in and encourage people to go
for public sector work
now more private workforces are pausing
their hiring maybe even undergoing quiet
layoffs leading to more desirability for
public work again
potentially indicating a recession could
be here or near Mark Cuban is getting
heat for saying back in 2021 quote if
you work for me I require my employees
to be vaccinated unless there's a
doctor's reason why you can't be now
there are some messages from telegram
circulating that suggests when you get
vaccinated and tell others to do the
same all come on your podcast my choice
not to support people who haven't been
vaccinated this is a very much in
contrast to something like what a Vivek
aramiswami says who even though him and
his wife have differing opinions makes
potentially quite a reasonable argument
that a lot of people relate with today
the vague argues that he regrets taking
the covet vaccine and says if he had the
facts he had now would not have gotten
vaccinated and many probably agree with
that his wife on the other hand who
works with a lot of cancer patients
given that she's a laryngologist
something that having to do with like
swallowing and voice disorders but
anyway she deals with a lot of folks who
have undergone treatment for cancer
which is absolutely terrible knock on
wood nobody watching ever has to deal
with this it's absolutely horrible but
anyway she says she felt she had a
responsibility to have a vaccine because
of the patients she was around and this
sounds quite reasonable now just as sort
of a throwback back to my campaign for
governor in California take a listen to
this clip where I talk about the
constitutional right for a business to
determine their own rules around whether
or not they would require mandates and
this was in response to a question as to
whether or not I supported Gavin
newsom's mandates my opinion was clear I
was a big fan of individual choice and
business Choice path for ath agrees with
all the Republicans on stage in opposing
Governor newsom's vaccine and mask
mandates I believe every individual
business has the constitutional right
and every individual building has the
right to determine their own mandate
rules now let's talk about housing
having hit a wall and it's not just talk
it's literally what I'm starting to see
and it's spreading much like a covid
virus it's really bizarre and kind of
freaky it's something to pay attention
to and I'll tell you we are just
drooling at house hack for the
opportunity to buy even cheaper deals
we're expecting to buy about a hundred
unlivable fixed roppers and we can't
wait to go shopping here's where we're
finding weakness and where some pain
just hit the wall first of all Oregon's
been weak like all freaking year long
Boise's been pretty weak as well Austin
started booming though in Texas between
the beginning of the year and about July
but guess what over the last two months
the Austin Market based on what we're
seeing on the ground working with
Realtors has hit a wall this means we're
putting a pause on taxes until maybe we
hit a bottom closer to late October
November we're watching the data we're
going to be data driven on this but boy
some markets are hitting more of a wall
than others let me give you another
example we verbally floated an idea that
hey maybe we'd be willing to be at about
470 000 on a certain property in an area
where we started to see the market term
then we decided you know what Market's
turning in this area we're gonna wait
and let it bottom out a little bit first
seller calls us and says hey look you
were at 470. I I can't go all the way
down to where you want would you
consider 460 no would you consider 450
no okay then they let a couple days go
by how about 4 30. no and then they're
like okay okay okay we we know you've
wanted to be at 420 that's what you
floated to us after you kind of
initially were floating around 470
you're like maybe you'd be convinced at
4 20. how about we go for 420. and then
I'm like yeah that's how I felt a few
days ago now I don't feel like that
anymore and they're like oh
for me it's actually this perfect
experiment into what's going on in the
market because that's how I know what
competition there is if they keep
calling me back the competition just
vanished and that is different we did
not see that in July we have not seen
that anywhere throughout the year we
didn't really see it in August with the
exception of certain parts of the
country and now we're starting to see it
more and more now that we're in
September my guess is as I've been
saying for over a year and a half Q3 Q4
2023 is going to be where the party is
and I have a feeling the party's just
getting started so buckle up for a
roller coaster there's some
opportunities coming up How's that gonna
go make some money by the way stay tuned
because we've got some big announcements
coming for house hack on China Xi
Jinping snub Joe Biden last week in
favor of Biden just meeting with the
Prime Minister of China big slap in the
face and we gotta pay attention to
Country Garden this is China's largest
privately run property developer it's in
big financial distress and could be a
bigger crisis than ever Grant 2021's
default that could lead to some
disinflation as it continues to
contribute to the contraction of the
Chinese economy although so far oil
prices rising to now 95 bucks a barrel
of crude for Brent not so great for the
disinflation narrative but it is a pro
tightening Financial conditions
narrative which could lead the FED to
pause but definitely could end up
causing some inflation straight through
higher oil and energy prices not great
but this country garden issue big deal
and given that a lot of Chinese
households have lost faith in housing as
a safe investment you could end up
seeing a renewed deepening of the real
estate crash in China since Country
Garden focuses a lot on the suburban
area and even rural areas you might end
up seeing a whole lot more pain than you
might otherwise see in areas where
people are really focused on wanting to
live which are
bigger cities in other words maybe more
stability in places like Shanghai and
Beijing which are deemed to be some of
the top tier investable property markets
and everything outside of these areas
not faring as well on top of this you've
got a pretty big piece from a
presidential candidate in Taiwan he's
also the mayor of Taipei the capital of
Taiwan and the biggest argument this
presidential candidate makes is that
Taiwan needs to build up its Western
Alliance and its military capabilities
to deter China from invading Taiwan
while at the same time showing that they
are willing to democratically talk with
China well unfortunately for Taiwan
China doesn't seem to want to care so
much about talking instead China's right
back to flexing China flew a record 103
warplanes near Taiwan marking the most
in Bloomberg compiled data going back
three years the China activity appears
to be in response to American visits
said Taiwan especially Arizona's
Governor Katie Hobbs as tsmc is building
a massive facility in Arizona just
outside of well it's actually within the
Phoenix area sort of towards the western
side of Phoenix Taiwan now reporting
that the Chinese military presence is
posing a serious security challenge to
Taiwan but Taiwan also really concerned
because they import the vast majority of
their energy over 90 percent and that
maybe they've got to focus on nuclear or
some form of homegrown energy to finally
be less dependent on outside sources
that could easily be cut off and crimped
by China some say this is more saber
rattling from China but also counter
Sable rattling from Taiwan so they can
get more support from America now I
promise to snip it from our Daily Wealth
emails and in today's Daily Wealth email
snippet we are going to talk about
work-life balance since basically in my
opinion there is no such thing as a work
life imbalance you have to enjoy what
you do because ultimately everything
that you're doing every single day is
part of your life and in my opinion it's
the quality of what you do that matters
not the nominal hours that you spend so
maximize quality and manage your
productivity rather than your time spend
focused quality hours on your journey to
success it's not about the time on paper
that counts in a balanced life for
example if I spend two or three days
crashing hard stud crash studying super
hard for a test to make sure I could
pass that Series 7 broker exam like I
did last week that's high quality Focus
time on passing that exam with almost no
family time and that seems really out of
balance but then when I pass guess what
I get to celebrate with my friends and
family uh now
yeah
I can now enjoy quality time building
Legos with my eight-year-old going on a
run with my children I could spend time
not only playing Luigi's Mansion with
them but riding go-karts with them or
going to Chuck E cheese with them and
that quality time is so much more
valuable because it is in contrast to
the hard work that I did to Succeed in
Business and now I can succeed with
family and it's that yin and yang that
actually makes me enjoy both work and
family why not advertise these things
that you told us here I feel like nobody
else knows about this we'll try a little
advertising and see how it goes
congratulations man you have done so
much people love you people look up to
you Kevin path right there financial
analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always
great to get your take
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.