Ανοιχτό Διάλογο (Open Dialogue, Greek subtitles)
FULL TRANSCRIPT
what for you what is the most important
thing about open
dialogue the first thing what I I find
myself thinking
now if you ask this tomorrow there would
be another
thing that would come first to my mind
but today what comes curs to my mind is
that uh everybody's uh voice is
uh
[Music]
important I decided to travel to the
north of Finland to visit the Land of
Open dialogue the place that is getting
the best results in the world for the
treatment of psychosis
wow what's the most
important it's how we work yeah Co
research of of problems or dilemas or
traumas they get better results than
anywhere in the United States and I was
curious how they did their work
I think it's
it's not the you know the the treatment
system system per se but but I think
it's more like
a political
[Music]
thing I want to see
you we aim at at at the democratic
system
where people can have their say about
their own treatment and that we are kind
of try to be on the same same level with
people and being uh equal with them I'd
read some of their research and their
data were undeniably impressive but
somehow I just felt that seeing them in
person would be a whole different thing
hey him you can you can look up here up
here I I can see your it's something
that happens
between people the sister of the patient
the patient himself or the nurse oh wait
hold on we have to get the
repor to bring their understandings
bring their skills and knowledges we we
we are not professionals who who had has
had to know everything right away you
know we don't go there like a specialist
and after one hour we tell family what's
wrong with you it's a kind of two-way
connecting um it's not me treating
somebody but it's
something
um I risk myself when I enter into a
conversation who are they what are they
like is their Fame Justified but perhaps
most importantly to me how would they
feel about me a foreigner an American a
psychotherapist myself filming them okay
no don't look at the camera look at them
and say you can talk to them this is
open
dialogue this is real open this is real
we have the idea of hearing
people and creating something together
based on that
[Music]
before I left home I had the opportunity
to speak with Robert Whitaker an
acclaimed medical journalist who has
been bringing the Finnish open dialogue
results to the attention of American
Psychiatry it was he who made it clear
to to me that their outcomes for
psychosis were not coincidental rather
that they resulted from a well-designed
and well researched program so when I go
to Western lap land in Finland what do
you think my mission should
be well first of all I think it's just a
chance to
observe um there's so many
different people involved in the finish
story do you have an entire Therapy
Clinic here but just one room yes and
that's why we
can't we don't have room to meet
patients here and we don't want to meet
patients here because this is Hospital
yeah we don't want to say to people who
have crisis that oh welcome to mental
hospital so we can talk here it it it
was an interesting thing because when I
first came here I was thinking I think
they work very well with the mental
health system and they're even
integrated into the mental health system
but I kept waiting to find out where is
the mental health system okay do do you
understand yeah yeah and then what I
realized yeah it's this this is the
mental health system yeah yeah and I
thought that's that's actually
fascinating uhoh oh
uhoh somebody's calling when someone
calls when someone needs help we triy to
arrange help for him or her rri way we
don't I don't say to a phone that uh
maybe we can meet uh after two weeks and
then we have time I think I have to find
but do you have to you're
attached that's
okay oh
I'll turn off the camera you're going to
be privy to a form of care that really
is getting the best outcomes in the
developed World by far that's a part of
our you
know uh basic rules when the phone calls
you have to answer it take the
responsibility for for what comes from
there that it is interesting how many
many many of my interviews have been
interrupted by the telephone here yeah
yeah because I I think that's that's a
question
of you know being being uh like
available to people and and and serving
the population not not hospital patients
but people outside
hospital I'm sorry I have to answer you
go you never know what what comes from
the telephone it could have been a
mother being worried about her child or
or something and and then I would have
have to start organizing things you
never know I mean it's so different
there okay I mean if you look at the
outcomes people recovering there they're
not here and so many other
countries
so basically the world has a chance to
sort of break out of this mindset it's
hand the world psychiatric system and do
something better and so you're talking
about the capacity the the opportunity
to tell a story that literally could
alter millions of lives if societies
would change and learn from uh the
Western lap land success so that that
could have happened right right there
yeah
yeah I'm very pleased that it didn't
happen because I have to be at the at
the town at half past two but oh in cam
yeah I guess what I'm trying to tell you
Dan is that
um I really think there's opportunity
here yeah at the Town mental health
office I have a patient there with with
a nurse from from there we are working
together with with the patient H so
you're meeting with a nurse and with the
patient yeah so that phone is a big
responsibility yes middle of the night
also yes does that make sense yeah it
makes sense and I'm just I'm
wondering are there any psychiatric
survivors in Western Lapland I mean what
do they think of this method I mean are
there people who are criticizing this
open dialogue method and what do they
think in Finland I wonder there are some
psychiatric survivors in Finland uh but
more you know in the other areas do the
patients prefer that you meet in their
home or do they prefer to come to the
hospital most of
people says Welcome to our home but
there are people who don't want us to go
there and then we meet here or or some
other places we have you know Center of
City we have a other poin there yes in
Tor in the town and there are rooms more
rooms and we
can have a
point meeting to and so you give the the
patient the choice yes yes but most
places have have adopted the Western
right the US model of I've gotten people
who bought my other movie Finland and
Helsinki and they're telling me Finland
sucks for
Psychiatry I remember first coming
here first coming
here uh it must have been
19 65 or something you came here in 1965
what you were 10 years old yeah but
that's how sinky that's not Western
Lapland so it's like they were like yeah
my brother or I or you know you know my
child were locked up in a hospital and
injected with the same drugs that we're
using over here yeah yeah actually
outcomes for schizophrenia as a whole in
Finland are very poor and that actually
that actually sort of shows that it's
not just the culture people say ah
Western you know Finland they do think
there a it's a much different Society
well there are outcomes where they have
adopted the medical model and by the way
Finn doctors are being bought off by the
psychi by pharmac companies too uh their
outcomes suck right I was singing in a
Boy
Choir for the patients in the hospital
yeah yeah we made a a trip here and and
and had a small concert here and I was I
I remember being
quite not shocked but but surprised that
that there would be also these kind of
places in the
world I mean one of the interesting
things here is this is known as a valley
in Finland this West s that actually has
a lot of medical problems okay
and it may do everything have everything
to do with the temperature the light uh
maybe changing economic opportunities so
it's actually a society that's been
under a lot of stress for a long time so
you came here was it very different from
what it's like now yeah very
different it was uh very worn out
hospital and and very uh in a bad shape
in many ways and
and just chronic patients and
and smelling bad and everything so it
was a scary experience so for them to
and you know sort of reverse this one
part of psychotic outcomes it's not
coming as the society as a whole is
having this great Easy Life they're
doing it in spite of all those
difficulties I remember it quite we
coming here with right here yeah strange
singing in the lobby there is at the
[Music]
do although I went to Northern Finland
to study them I quickly discovered that
they were also studying me so much so
that a finished newspaper poolan sanomat
discovered that an American documentary
filmmaker had arrived in the area they
wanted to interview me which I found
ironic considering that to the rest of
the world they are the famous ones I
came to Finland to torneo specifically
and kemi because they have their open
dialogue method for
psychosis where did you hear uh of that
method it's famous it's famous oh yeah
so yeah and I mean there what it is is
I've heard of it in the United States
okay I've heard of it in conferences in
Scandinavia I have friends in England
who know about it but mostly through the
work of psychologist yako secula the
idea of living in Toro started when I
moved there for being a clinical
psychologist
1981 so quite long time ago almost 30
years uh 30 years 30 years ago yeah and
we were a small group of people and uh
we all had an interest that we want to
have a family to become involved in the
treatment of severe mental health
problems he's a professor at the
University in U vascula mhm so before I
came here I interviewed him and I'd met
him at several different times in
different countries I I remember some
meetings that were not for help for the
people and in which we actually acted
quite stupidly yeah early on early on
yeah yeah so you made mistakes early on
yeah we made mistakes like what his
research showed that for treating people
with psychosis they get the best results
statistically in the world we still
thought of the treatment that we are the
therapist we have to make plan we have
to have some aims and we use for
instance these open meetings as an
intervention to have change within the
family so I was a psychotherapist in New
York City for 10 years what what
happened was that that we didn't realize
in the beginning but while we open up
the door for the family and for the
client to be there for the paent to be
there from the very
beginning it it's the case that uh that
uh they really take a very decisive and
active role in the process the the
patient does yeah and the family does
they affect from the very beginning how
to do what to go on what are their needs
and and we still try to to think that we
are the healers we have the intervention
we have to do that part of my special
interest is showing that people
diagnosed with
schizophrenia and
psychosis can
recover fully without medication okay so
the confusion was that you thought you
were the the experts the healers the one
who have to make the decisions yeah and
what you found is that they wanted to
take an active part also
so they were treating themselves as the
healers and the decision makers and they
would be the on who made the decisions
and the interventions so there was
conflict yeah a very much conflict about
it here they do that work okay this is
the work and it's very uncommon now we
think that it's no longer a question
that we are sitting together for making
decisions and making plans for the
future but we are sitting together to
understand more most places in the world
this is funny what what that I'm talking
slow slowly is it better though yeah
it's better yeah and and in this we aim
at generating dialogue and this actually
becomes the most important aspect no
longer thinking that the aim of the
meeting is to have solution the
solutions comes a PA of self evident
process that is opened up will be focus
on how do we manage to have all the
voices heard so the purpose is the
purpose is dialogue and as a consequence
of the dialogue the solutions happen
yeah to change start to happen
[Music]
immediately the open dialogue approach
is based on several fundamental
principles the basic one perhaps not
surprisingly involves open dialogue a
non secretive nonh Hier archical
conversation that values everyone's
voice in the treatment especially the
voice of those called clients likewise
therapists work in teams where they
speak and reflect openly with one
another about their thoughts and
feelings right in front of clients and
their
families although these principles sound
reasonable enough in actual practice
they are a profound departure from
almost every mental health model I have
observed in in the United States when
you decided to become a nurse did you
think you would become a therapist also
no they called me and asked me can I
come to summer job here and so I
came at one summer and I'm still here 11
years now really so you liked it yeah
was that may maybe in maybe first year I
I think thought that I'm not sure about
this and I Tred to maybe I try to check
out different kinds of work in
anesthesia and surgery but I'm very
pleased that I stayed and what was
difficult the first
year you know that dialogue what I like
about this is is just that you can
like how do you say in English ball
around with ideas with you can what what
you know bounce idea bounce bounce ideas
yeah with your colleague and and what
with the family and right in front of
the client yeah yeah and with them not
not about them but but with them you
know talk with barana about something
and then ask ask the patient that but
what do you think about what we were
talking about
and
yeah we sit down and there was a patient
maybe a wife or someone from the
family and uh couple of nurses doctor
and we start to talk about the
situation I thought that okay what what
are we sitting here we know what what is
going to be and what what is going to
happen we have to take this person in
the W and what what why why why why are
we sitting here and discussing
still but uh until you understand that
this discussion there there's meaning
when I wake wake up in the morning it
it's very good when I I I see my
timetable my my calendar that I I have
for example five clients or maybe six
today and I have um Team I have
someone who can work with me it's very
good idea it's feel it's make me feel
good the thing that we are sharing the
work all the time is that we are
ventilating it all the time as well mhm
so the the thoughts are kind of uh they
are in in a movement all the time it's
very
helpful when you can
share your thoughts and your uh feelings
with someone in in that treatment
situation you can reflect the first
meeting with the
patient uh patient can be wor first a
little bit um
you know why why two workers but when we
explain it and when we start working and
discussing together so it's he or she
finds out that it's good and sometimes
we are
three for example when when we have a
new
patient
psychotic uh with her or his family then
we of
take three therapists there are many
things it's hard to say to client
clients this well I'm thinking about
this and I'm feeling like this it's
easier for me for example to talk to you
or you and hey I'm wondering and I'm
feeling that or that way during our
discussions during our treatment
meetings it is the first time when the
patient can tell
his or her
own
experiences that kind of experiences
that somebody can say that they are
psychotic experiences and others are
listening and hearing
it I do sometimes meet
people just by myself but I think it's
Getting Thinner it's it's giving much
less options it's it's um it's much
smaller audience for the for this new
understandings this is the way how we
usually work that we go we can look each
other in the eyes and we turn ourselves
a little bit in the middle of a therapy
session yes so in the middle of a
therapy session when you're with a
client or with a family you do this with
each other you're going back and forth
and talking to each other yes yes and
then then we can ask hey how how do you
felt how does it felt and what did you
listen how did you heard this our
discussion so it's almost like you're
doing
supervision with each other yes in the
middle in the middle of a therapy
session that's it that's I think that's
that's how we would describe we have
much more options when when when we are
more
people
um and then it's also possibility just
to listen while some some other people
are talking and and listen to yourself
so I think it's in many ways it's very
useful and and it's very important that
we reflect about things and issues what
family bring up to the situation yes
it's very important I consider us more
or less as visitors in people's lives
people allow us to visit their lives
but we are not the most meaningful
people in in this person's life it's
more more important that my client will
be
understood by his family members or
those people around him and so that's
how he or she become heard understood
[Music]
valued uh as a person but it's a
different kind of supervision because
you can't you have to do it in a way
that's also therapeutic for the family
and the client isn't that it yes so you
have to make sure everything you're
saying is going through the lens like
this is the lens the lens of being
therapeutic yeah so you have to be more
respectful you know like in supervision
I think you can say this is
that father is so narcissistic when it's
private supervision you know but you can
never say that in open dialogue because
it's rude does that sound right yes yes
it's it's very well I think so think
yeah and it also seems like people here
like each other
yeah yeah I'm actually when you say that
I think that's one
big thing
that this is a small area and and if we
have a 100 people working here working
cras cross with with each other so
people know also each other quite
personally you
know they can become friends and then
and talking other about other things
also than than work and I think that's
makes it easy for for us to to work in
the way we
[Music]
work I ended up spending 2 weeks in
Northern Finland and became friendly
with many of their
clinicians while talking off camera I
learned that several to my surprise had
little experience working in a non-open
dialogue system to the degree that many
appeared to underestimate the
international significance of what they
were doing so your whole professional
experience has been in this open
dialogue system yes but I have a a
experience on meeting in a different
area a conference no like a bti that has
G the different PR yeah and uh a
different area with outside of your
regular work area and because we are
Outpatient Clinic that we treated him at
at home but when he goes to another
place he goes to hospital and we go to
meeting to to so you went there yeah how
was
that I didn't like
it what was it like um there was a nurse
and a doctor from that hospital and us
two nurses and the patient and she a two
nurses from your system here yeah and uh
and
we we discussed with the patient and and
nurses we um uh reflect oh you did open
dialogue yeah and try to speak openly on
the what we have done and and what we
think of situation and so on but during
the
meeting the um doctor just listened and
and when he had heard enough he said
okay thank you I've heard enough and
goes away didn't say anything well so
didn't do open couple of questions but
she doesn't participate on the on the
dialogue was that strange for you yeah
and I okay you
go and you talked about this with the
other nurse from your system here yeah
we thought when we talked afterwards
that with the another nurse
that when the doctor goes away and said
that okay that's enough for me him and
left it f i felt that and she felt that
that what what were what we were there
[Music]
about I was very curious how clinicians
in Western lap approached the subject of
neuroleptics that is antis psychotic
medication from what I have observed and
studied the use or nonuse of
neuroleptics is probably the most
important factor correlated with
recovery from
psychosis but before the essentials of
the Fin's relationship to medication
came to light I found it important to
explore some background not just on
neuroleptics but on the Fin's conception
of the very meaning of psychosis so most
places most places in the
world when they have a person with
psychosis yeah they put them on very
heavy medication
immediately is that like all over the
world or just in the western
part uh it's definitely in the western
part of the world but it's shifting okay
to all over the world and there is
research showing that people with
psychosis do
better in third world countries what
they did is they compared schizophrenia
outcomes in uh poor countries of the
world specifically India Nigeria and
Colombia to uh rich countries Us and
other European countries quote the
developed countries developing versus
developed now in each study they found
that outcomes at the end of two and five
years one was a two-year one was a 5year
study were much much better in the poor
countries of the world especially in
India and Nigeria by the way
okay and it was so dramatic they said
that living in a developed country is
quote a strong predictor that she'll
never fully recover from a psychotic or
schizophrenic break all of us could have
psychotic problems it's an answer to a
very difficult life situation and when I
deal when when I face with a situation
which is very stressful for me so I can
start to hear voices for instance and
what happens in those voices or or or or
those experience that I have they can
include something that previously has
happened in my life we have to listen we
we we really have to listen and um let
them talk what has happened and we can't
know maybe some stories are so um crazy
maybe crazy what is the right word um we
have to ask more about hallucination and
we have to ask more and try to
understand what has happened we don't
say that you can't you don't you can't
speak we have no right to say that that
is impossible because we really don't
know it's it's not only that we are
talking that um we have an open dialogue
system but uh we dialogue have to really
be open so one of the things they
hypothesize The Who researchers is well
maybe what the difference is is that
people in the poor countries are better
at taking their anti-yo medications
they're they live in a different
environment where they follow doctor's
orders better and so they looked at
medication usage so the hypothesis was
more medication usage would be
associated with better outcomes and
they're hypothesizing that the meds
should alter the long-term course of
schizophrenia psychosis it's a valid
hypothesis that's what you'd expect
drugs to do if you're going to find them
useful is to alter the course but what
they find they found that in the poor
countries of the world only 16% of the
people were regularly maintained on
antis psycotic medications whereas of
course that's the standard of care in
the uh developed countries so here in
this in this study we found good
long-term outcomes much higher recovery
rates associated with not maintaining
people on medications very
seldom very very seldom I I've been
prescribing anti psychotic
medicine and usually what is the reason
for so seldom prescribing it well I
don't
actually I think I prescribe very seldom
any medication so that's one point
that's one point in the first meeting
it's very nonone understandable I cannot
understand how what what what what does
it mean I'm very confused but later on
step by step I start to realized that
actually she is speaking of something
that has happened in her life and this
may be the first time ever it become
possible to have some words of those
experiences it's in a way a kind of
metaphorical way to speak of things that
you that beforehand did not have any
words to speak about it psychotic
meaning making is meaning
making and I want to uh have dialogue
around meaning
making and I don't think we should
medicate
psychotic meaning making oh by the way
the who invest instigators eventually
then did like a 25e follow-up study of
the patients in the poor countries and
it's really remarkable I I don't
remember the statistics exactly but
somewhere between roughly 70% of the
patients in that initial cohort of
schizophrenia patients diagn in Indian
Nigeria diagnosed a schizophrenic by
Western doctors not local doctors so by
Western standards 20 25 years later were
working asymptomatic they just weren't
schizophrenic anymore there weren't
psychotic anymore and for that reason
it's very
important actually extremely important
for us to take it
seriously to start to listen what what
is what what are her words and and and
step by step she perhaps have more and
more words to her to to to her
experience there's some kind of dilemma
in your in your life and and in your
emotional
life and when you start to work with
that
dilemma the symt can go away as
[Music]
well I learned during my time in Western
lap land that open dialogue
practitioners view the concept of
psychosis very differently from how most
people view it in the United
States in America psychosis is generally
viewed as a problem residing in a
particular individual's brain which is
why treatment so often involves pulling
people out of their regular lives
hospitalizing them and giving them brain
altering
medications in Western lap land however
they conceptualize psychosis as a
problem arising in the space between
individuals that is a problem occurring
within
relationships thus their treatment seeks
to engage social networks rebuild
relationships ship and if at all
possible avoid putting people through
the alienating and stigmatizing
experience of hospitalization why do you
prefer to not put people in the
hospital
if if the whole um psychosis or
um situation goes over without coming to
hospital so if they're able to work it
through without going to the hospital
yes it's much better for the patient and
family they don't have history of mental
hospital I remember one family in early
90s that they had a son about 20 five 26
years old and first he came into the
hospital for some days most of the times
that need be in hospital is because they
need shelter or place to be that it's
safe enough to the patient that he don't
or she kill herself or or is so um
psychotic that needs a safe place to be
another big reason if someone hasn't
been sleeping let's say for a week and
they need a place where to kind of uh
feel safe so we can create those
circumstances to their homes as well if
we do the cooperation and and work
together with the family and afterwards
we asked the family what they think they
said that it was very hard when they son
was in the hospital and also it was very
hard to treat him at home but it was
much more easier at home so you can
create you can work out those kind of
issues in in their home yeah and we can
go there every day we can be there let's
say uh we can have a treatment meeting
and then one nurse can stay there during
the evening shift like all night long
yeah with the with the with the family
with the family in the home yeah and
they said that it
was wrong decision to come into the
hospital at all H so that just avoids
the need for hospitalization then yeah
and when we are home there are more
possibilities to have the conversations
about the situation very often these
relatives comes to
help for but it's very difficult then if
we talk about adolesence and see he has
psychotic symptoms and see or he has
have has parents it's very typ difficult
that parents live on SI leave and they
can support at home and we
meet every for instance every
day uh during these first days weeks
first days always when we are treating
at home I think it's very important to
have treatment
meetings
very every day day in the beginning and
continue as long as POS as
[Music]
needed although I would ideally prefer a
mental health system for psychosis that
avoids neuroleptics entirely the Finish
open dialogue clinicians employ a
selective use of medication model that
comes closer to my idea
than any major program I've seen in the
United States for that reason I found
their point of view riveting and in many
cases based on such common sense that I
wondered why it wasn't being utilized
more widely in the Western World now I
ask about your documentaries when it
comes out what it is I'm not sure yet I
don't know you just doing I'm making the
movie first to just to show people in
the world that that there are better
treatments than the conventional
treatments so here in the United States
where we've really embraced the drugs
for life form of care we see a um
explosion in the number of people quote
disabled by mental illness and we see
all these other problems in terms of
people dying early Etc and low
employment rates decreasing employment
rates and here where they've used this
drugs in a selective manner what do they
find the exact opposite so what should
we do obviously we should go to which is
what you're going to do we should go to
Western lap land if they'll have us and
try to figure out what they're doing and
emulate it quite quite a many people
psychotic people who come to us they get
some kind of
medication but it's for a short period
of time to get over the worst and and
then we discuss it all the time so I
think it's more of a a minimizing the
medication and which type of medication
are you talking about uh well I'm not
expert in in those but but not so much
about you know neuroleptics but but more
of a you
know sleeping pills or some anxi litics
we used it during the first week because
the situation when they call us so we we
will see them uh in the first 24 hours
and the situation is usually so that
person hasn't been sleeping for a week
or two it's always here that we just
consider that's how many tablets we give
we don't prescribe a box of tablets but
we think maybe for for one or two days
use two or four tablets so that's the
most common that they use in a short
term just four or five days or so to get
sleep and so
but in some cases uh they can use uh
neuroleptics but it's also a shortterm
and in small doses in the beginning of
the
treatment we we have to it's my opinion
I have to avoid netive medication and
but but then if it's
needed if it's
needed in any let's say in one year of
all the patients that you see that have
psychotic issues what percentage get put
on neuroleptic medication about
one 30 30% yes so 70% don't ever get
neuroleptic
medication some sometimes there are
situations that patient need medication
also netic medication there can be so
kind of situation here's a question I
have mhm we were upstairs in that staff
room MH and I was playing with a pen did
you see that no I was playing with this
really nice pen I said someone left
their really nice pen here then I turned
it over and it said squil yeah so I
thought it's even invaded this place
yeah yeah and then I see the people are
using the mouse pad that says
um yeah affects her yeah but how how we
talk about
that medication and we have to be
careful that that those does are
appropriate that there are no side
effects well of course they come here as
well to talk about the medication to
doctors they do yeah and they bring good
food many times and pancakes and
stuff and uh also we we are going to
have a a day for stuff next autumn and
so we have invited person from the druck
com company to come and tell about sok
and then they are going to pay our
lunch how do you feel about that it's
okay for me because we are just
listening them is that it though
yeah it's
quite usual for us to discuss a lot
about medication
ation also with the psychiatrists when
they're prescribing medication to some
patients then I would quite often
ask why do you prescribe this what do
you hope would happen would there be
another and you say this right in front
of the client yeah because I think it's
it's quite it's fair yes just just fair
to to
say what we are what our you know
prejudices on and what our thoughts are
in front of the client yeah well
actually bir she's our doctor in Poly
Clinic and she said that she's not going
to call them she she she doesn't do that
right so but one of our nurses went to
the educational days and she asked
because we said okay because we get a
free lunch right so take it I remember
two patients I prescribed and tried to
tell how to you had to take this
medication but they didn't never do that
and they are quite well so you prescri
so there even cases where you prescrib
the medication they don't even take it
yes and Tred to tell them that they have
to take to take it and they didn't yes
they didn't and they are getting well
anyway anyway against your advice
yes I wonder this mhm if a patient if
you feel a patient needs neuroleptic
medication later in the treatment do you
consider that a
failure
[Music]
no
no there are so many other ways to help
there are
[Music]
so
um useful ways which have I think um
improves the agency of people much
more than
um than
medication it it seems to me if a person
needs
neuroleptics it means they did not
recover
right yes but I have also some so kind
of experience is that the patient have
got NE medication later but uh but see
or he
needed uh it some
months one two years or only a small dos
and after that they didn't need it I
could bring up the idea as um as a as an
option as a something we could have
dialogue about around think about
possible uh advantages possible
disadvantage um possible effects
possible side
effects but if I find a lot of other
ways to work there so I don't even have
to bring this option
there and usually when we work there are
so many options that we don't get into
this point of thinking about medication
if the patient have
medication we don't Ender treatment and
you don't end the treatment no no
because we continue treatment so so far
as they use medication for instance
neptic with the purpose of helping them
stop the medication or I don't
understand yes yes helping stop yes it's
not either either or it's either
medication or not medication but it's
thought to be one part of the treatment
if needed
if if needed so it's such a complicated
thing who decides what's needed you know
jointly in the meeting in the joint
meeting is it's it's it should be
decided in the joint meetings and do you
ever have different staff members with
different opinions absolutely yeah and
that's advisable that if staff members
have different opinions that they would
could be openly spoken about so that one
staff members could have an idea perhaps
the antipsychotic medication is not
needed here and perhaps the other meas
person have an idea perhaps the
medication would be good and it's very
important to have an open discussion
about
[Music]
it a fascinating thing I discovered in
Western lap land was that their
clinicians were not unlike so many of my
more Progressive colleagues in the
United States afraid of getting in
trouble for the work they did this I
realized was because the fins were not
working in a mental health system that
constantly suggested they were breaking
the standards of care and causing harm
to their clients the irony I found in
this is that in the United States we who
use anti psychotics almost ubiquitously
for psychosis get terrible results and
actually are causing an epidemic of harm
but in the Western World almost
everywhere it's medication and
medication is considered the best
treatment and if a therapist or an
organization does not use
medication they're considered
dangerous okay it's considered bad
treatment it's very very difficult to
survive as a person with prescribing
powers and not put people on
antipsychotic medications and if you're
even if you're a therapist without
um prescribing Powers you're expected to
work within that model of of of drug
based care and it shows really the
extraordinary capacity of uh a
storytelling partnership within in the
United States that really has extended
its influence and that is born of the
drug companies and academic Psychiatry
along with nami to tell us a in essence
a false story and and incorporate that
belief in the sort of a real uh profound
way are you at any risk with your
medical license because of the way you
work
here um haven't gotten so far away from
a medical way of working no I think
um
um no like let me ask you this do you
take a lot of Risk by not putting people
on neuroleptics right away
uh what do you mean by taking uh risks
could you lose your
license if I don't do what if I
don't tell people that I think that
there should be
medication yeah of course
not where did you come
there what's that idea but that you
could lose your license yeah well I
dealt with that every day if I if I was
working in different contexts
it would be quite difficult
um but over here where where the whole
personal uh the whole Personnel the
whole staff whole staff
yes they are very well trained a most of
the people have family therapy
trainings um the whole supply of
services is is based on on these ways of
working so you're not at risk here no
not at all no
really because me you couldn't get in
trouble no so me as a nurse so I I will
what about Bita couldn't she get in
trouble for what she does no why because
uh she can um everything is based on the
uh results of
treatments so everybody here knows that
you don't need a neur leptic in the
beginning
to to heal people's
situations and your system has research
to prove it yes yes yes yes and there
are lots of studies going going on
around so I think it's it's
um giving a lot of solid ground for the
[Music]
work let's now look at the numbers what
actually are their
results it was after all a cursory
review of their outcomes for psychosis
that Drew me to Northern Finland in the
first place and these same outcomes that
are causing the world to take note their
adoption of this selective use of meds
really came out of a national finish
study where they were testing sort of
psychotherapeutic care they had six
sites in the study three sites did not
initially put people on the meds the
other three did and everybody gave them
psychotherapeutic care T was one
research site in which the antipsychotic
medication was not started in the very
beginning but it was decided that first
we have to see how much this very strong
psychosocial intervention is helping and
the antipsychotic medication is used
only if if if it's uh not helping enough
and the thought was an experimental
sites is that if people started needing
the drugs you could put them on okay on
the whole the experimental sites three
had a little bit better outcomes two it
was the people who in those three
experimental sites that were never
exposed to meds in the two-year study
that had the best outcomes all
right that fits with what we know before
but there's one other key thing there
was really only one of the three
sites uh that really after the end of
six weeks tried to keep people off meds
okay the other two to basic reverted to
the old standard of care and put people
on meds that was in Western lap land so
not only did they watch the progression
of people getting better after 6 weeks
some they kept it going during 5 years
time it happened that oneir of the
clients used antipsychotic medication
two dirs did not need this is in your
program yeah any any antipsychotic
medication at five and half part of the
medication could be discontinued as well
half what could be discontinued stopped
of so so of the one3 that did take
medication half of those people were
able to discontinue their medication
yeah yeah so now you're down to at the
end of five years one out of six people
yeah is still on medication and only one
and three ever took it at all yeah yeah
yeah and what did that evolve to there
that evolved to a form of care where uh
they now have a the best outcomes in the
Western World by far how do they use
meds well about only about a third of
their first episode psychotic patients
um are ever exposed to medications okay
at the end of five years so you take
100 first episode psychotic patients in
Western Lapland 5 years later only 33
will have ever had a single dose of
antis psychotic medication and only
about 20 of that 100 will be on the
drugs continually okay so that was
already that's is a very different
compared with the mainstream idea very
distort that so m iotics medication
should be used in any case every case
every case yeah now what are their
outcomes at the end of 5 years roughly
85% of their first episode psychotic
patients are asymptomatic and either
working or back in school so only about
15% have become sort of chronically ill
and on Finland disability whereas in the
United States if you have a first
psychotic break or if you have a first
schizophrenic break you're basically
told we'll to stabilize you and then go
on disability that's the expected course
of the 85 % who recovered after 5 years
what percentage of that
85% was on medication and what what
percent was off
medication actually I have not looked at
that path most of them did not use
medication most meaning more than 50% no
90% there there is an assumption of
course that once someone has
schizophrenia they always have
schizophrenia and you don't see it that
way no I think it is only the name for
something and you can get quite healthy
afterwards without medication without
medication this tells us of something
else that's possible radically possible
radically possible and by the way
they've been doing this for 20 years now
basically or 18 years so this isn't a
fly by night study not a fly by night
and they've done study after study after
study this is the best studied cohort of
patients in all of Europe really
[Music]
we study our own work study quite
carefully what we are doing and and what
works and what doesn't work I don't see
this as very radical ideas I don't know
maybe somebody would see this as radical
ideas
but from my perspective it's it's not
very radical ideas and it's very
important that we
believe I believe in
that uh the situation can change so you
do see people with psychosis yeah
recover here get well without medication
yeah yeah not
easily not easily get better but but
getting better what makes you believe
because I have seen many many many
patients and their families that that
they
survived so kind of situations and I I
don't know I
don't
well I I believe I have seen that you
can recover from The psychosis without
heavy medications and without
hospitalization
so that's just the way that I
think so you believe that people can
recover yeah not only believe I I I
think it's true I I've seen
[Music]
it as my two weeks in Finland Drew to a
close I realized there was one final
point that kept striking me again and
again and that was that the open
dialogue approach was not an alternative
mental health system here it was the
primary mental health system here over
the past three decades they had set an
example by converting a traditional
psychiatric system with a huge bustling
hospital and poor results into something
quite the opposite there's one other
thing that's really extraordinary that's
happened in in Western LA and and speaks
to the possibility there but not many
people like you kind of people come here
and do this kind of job so I think this
is very interesting for us too to know
how uh interested someone in someone is
about this because for us I don't I
think we you never are they are never
proud of anything in the 70s and all 60s
7s probably I think into the and even
into the 80s this area of of Finland had
one of the highest incidences of
schizophrenia in all of Europe so fins
are never proud of what anything like
you're
very well well I noticed this when I'm
interviewing people here they won't talk
about how good their results are the
results are written on paper and I'm
asking them and they always make it
sound less less less and I say make
yourself sound good do you know what I
mean I like they're very modest and
humble yeah then they Institute this
change and they Institute this therapy
called open dialogue with first episode
psychotic patients guess what happened
schizophrenia is now disappearing from
this region
they're down to two cases per 100,000 a
90% decline in schizophrenia there and
why because their first episode cases
aren't becoming chronic so the number of
First episode cases is staying the same
all right so they still have this
problem of psychosis in society but
because they have this form of care that
doesn't make people chronic
schizophrenia is disappearing this point
cannot be emphasized enough and is worth
explaining a according to the
definitions of mainstream Psychiatry
people can only be diagnosed with
schizophrenia if their psychotic
symptoms persist for longer than 6
months thus if they recover from
psychosis before that six-month Mark
which is what so commonly happens in
Western lap land as the result of open
dialogue they never get labeled with
schizophrenia in the first place they
took a risk by letting me come in here
with my camera do you know what I mean M
like to let a foreigner come in with a
camera and interview all their staff and
to talk with their patients it's like a
lot of
places they don't want someone with a
camera coming in it's it's honest way to
do work I think and I I think that
um when someone comes into psychiatric
uh Polyclinic is and is in they are in
their CR
crisis I think that we are what's the
word obligated into that we have to be
honest this has to be a fair deal
because yeah because otherwise it it
can't heal anyone like what if they said
they could say this this would be much
more common because I had some places
that I wanted to go to that said you can
come you can come for 6 hours you you
can talk to two therapists no
conversation with patients and we need
to see everything that you are going to
put in your movie before you put it in I
think our system is our people are
working very hard and they are I can
trust them and they are
very reliable
and and responsible and that kind and
very good trained
people they know what they are doing and
you know what also this was very
interesting I didn't know if they would
let me come here because I'm a stranger
I'm a foreigner they don't know me very
well so I was emailing with yako secula
M and he said I said to him well don't
worry I won't make I'll be very nice and
I will ask respectful questions and I
won't make your program look bad he said
no he says you go in there he says you
ask whatever you want and he says you
don't try to make us look good he says
you make it real you make it
honest do you understand that M and I
said this is really
interesting I said good for him he's got
courage here's a here's something that I
think people might could have size open
dialogue for they say but having so many
different therapists there must be very
expensive
well how how come in the long run we
save money
with meeting in teams because I think
it's more efficient you don't have to
meet so many times this area is quite
poor and they try to save money all the
time and that's why it is it is not so
easy to tell that it is very good work
for long run and how
to prevent problems in the long run and
you know
I think at least in Finland the the
people who decide about money they don't
look beyond their
nose who pays for all this it's state
paid system so it's free for the clients
so it's a state paid system it's free
for the clients yeah it's free for all
the clients for you can have hundreds of
meetings for two years and it's all free
all free yeah when we are working in in
a team and meet people with their you
know wives husbands amilies then we
don't have to meet them so many times
for some reason I think because we can
get the different points of view or or
opinions more quickly we can have kind
of more uh wide discussion about things
all the time there is lack of money mhm
and we should have more nurses psycholog
assistant some some not so many but some
more when we meet a patient we sent sent
a bill so kind of Bill to the
municipalities right and they pay for it
but taxes we all paid for I think so so
your taxes pay for it is not important I
I think it is I try to tell our staff
members that they don't have to worry
about it it's my worry about the money
is it's funny I haven't figured out
where brigita's office is yet well
nobody knows her office is at kopas
right but she's never there right cuz
she's working she sees clients right
that's what everybody says it's hard to
find her there because she's she's on on
the ward or she's talking to someone or
she's out in the community somewhere
yeah it's very interesting to have a
hospital leader yeah who is actually
doing non-administrative work yeah I
think so too and and I appreciate that
for very much I think that's very
important for our work that that also
our our you know our highest Chief is is
in in the clinical work and and working
with us side by side it's it's so
valuable I I think it's and rare
[Music]
before I ended I wanted to hear people's
final Reflections on open
dialogue I only wish I could have added
in client Reflections which I couldn't
because of the systems confidentiality
agreements but if I can summarize what I
heard from clients off camera and heard
repeatedly it was the opposite of the
frustration rage alienation betrayal and
hopelessness so often expressed in the
United States
here I heard expressions of satisfaction
mutual respect togetherness trust and
hope which incidentally and by now for
me not surprisingly were the same things
I heard from the staff some people think
that this is my work life and this is my
personal life but in a way I don't see
the difference because I think that uh
it has
to I have to
have I need to be with those same values
in both places in at home and at work as
well yeah can I get you to find my paper
so I could use this yeah sure will you
sign it too okay up about 85% that
basically recover right their
unemployment rate is lower than the
background rate for Ault Finnish
population as a whole so they're doing
better in terms of employment than the
general finish population overall in
terms of working that's right so that's
really extraordinary so I just feel yeah
you can see that this is the one who I
interviewed this morning who said this
is no no no not her she's the one who is
um he's f p yeah she says oh my
God to get know patience family and meet
the whole family to hear the voices from
the whole family I think that's the most
important
and and
then this is the man yako secula every
year between five to to 7% of the
population participates in in in in
these open meetings and now this has
been going on for more almost 25 years
or more than 20 years so it means a big
part of the people in the area has at
least sometimes be participated in this
open meetings she's the head
psychiatrist she runs the whole
organization I liked when I came to work
here in in kobas hospital I liked most
the teamw work
it was
much it was so nice to talk to people
and not to know
everything and not to know answers
always she's a um well she's a nurse and
a family
therapist I have I have taught many
times that I like to move all because of
my private life so you would like to
move to yes because of my private life
but but
but I haven't done it because I like
to uh I like the way of
working here he's a a psychologist it's
a place where
you can be inspired over and over
again by the people you are working with
and and and by your colleagues and
and now you're a part of it too
[Music]
he
[Music]
B
[Music]
I've have seen people in ki you have
noticed it is much so
sorry can I ask you want me to turn this
off yes
[Music]
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.