SHOCKING New FACTS on Charlie Kirk SHOOTER Tyler Robinson

The shooting of Charlie Kirk by Tyler

Robinson has everybody scrambling to put

together a narrative as to why Tyler

Robinson would do this. In this video,

I'm going to break down some of the

latest facts in this case and why Tyler

Robinson might have gone after Charlie

Kirk. Not just specifically for what he

said, but what's inside of Tyler's

background that could have left him

prone to being ignited, if you will.

We're going to break down some medical

research here as well as look into

Tyler's background. So, let's keep it

straight. Let's keep it fast and let's

get to the facts right away because

that's what I like to do here is provide

facts and then give you unbiased

opinion. That is, I don't really care if

you're on the left or on the right. I

look at this as providing perspective as

an American. And honestly, I think the

vast majority of you feel the same way.

So, I'm just going to provide

information and then you can choose what

to believe from it. So, let's get

started. The first thing that we have to

understand about Tyler Robinson is that

there are a lot of rumors and

potentially even facts circulating about

potentially Charlie Kirk's alleged

assassin living with a transgender

partner who is now cooperating with the

FBI. Mind you, this is being reposted

literally by Kosh Patel, who is the

director of the FBI. So, it gives a lot

of credence to the idea that they have

more to go on than just a hunch that

Tyler Robinson is indeed somebody who

might be related to, well, let's say

either gay or transgender ideology,

especially since there are now comments

that potentially uh Tyler Robinson was

quote unquote spotted kissing

transgender partner just 2 weeks before

the assassination. But we have to be

really careful because journalists can

tend to get a little wild and a pry at

every single angle possible to try to

get any inkling as to what would

potentially lead people to believe the

partner is transgender. However, that

trans potential transgender partner is

now cooperating with the FBI in

interviews. So, you would assume that

the FBI has some more intel into this.

But I'm also seeing a lot of articles

where neighbors are like, "I don't know.

I don't want to go as far as calling him

trans." So, we don't quite know. But

what we do know is that this was

somebody who is radicalized. Currently,

there is a an FBI special agent named uh

James Gaglian. He calls what we're

seeing now quote unquote assassination

culture. One that is fueled by

grievance, the feel feeling of

superiority, some form of moral

absolutism, basically a license to kill.

And it doesn't take much for them to get

radicalized. And this is why right now

there's a lot of conversation about

could somebody who is potentially

transgender be more prone to

radicalization.

This now also then of course has people

on the flip side saying, "Oh, come on.

Like there are shootings all of the time

and only.11%

of all shootings are committed by

transgender individuals." But we also

have to understand that the time frame

in which we look at shootings is going

to make up what the statistics show. If

we go back and look at shootings over

the last 200 years, we have to realize

that maybe only the last 10 years are

people willingly and openly willing to

talk about transgenderism. Okay? Maybe

call it the last 20 years. Which means

really you can't look at the last 200

years of transgender data because most

people aren't going to identify as trans

who actually are trans. And this is not

a slight against trans individuals. This

is simply to understand statistical

analysis. There's a lot that goes into

this. We got to recognize that most

people who were trans weren't actually

willing to admit that they were trans

and they were more and more closet

trans, which is the same thing that

we've had for generations with gay. Now,

something that we want to look at

specifically when it comes to

transgenderism, is of course mental

illness. And this is where things start

getting really interesting because when

people feel like they are trapped in a

different body, we don't really know yet

what came first, the chicken or the egg.

It's possible that people who feel like

they're trapped in the wrong gender are

just mentally ill to start with. Or it's

possible that people who are having

these feelings of being trapped in the

wrong gender end up going to doctors who

say, "Well, the only way we can date you

out of this gender is if you have a

mental illness and therefore these

individuals are overdiagnosed." That's

worth going into what I'm about to tell

you with because again, my goal is to

make your brain go, "Oh, okay. I mean

like okay I I could see the six of one

half doz of the other right but now here

comes some of the data sets okay and

this is where things get a little less

opinion uh listen to this we performed a

cross-sectional analysis this is a

published these are published studies

all of the things we're about to go

through published studies uh and this is

on transgenderism we performed a

cross-sectional analysis of a prevalent

I believe this was a Yale study uh of

psychiatric diagnosis amongst

transgender patients in clinical care

using allpayer electronic health records

database blah blah blah blah of 10,270

transgender patients identified. Going

through through these records, they

found that 58%

of the transgender patients they

identified had at least one psychiatric

diagnosis, which means every like one in

two people, every other PE person who is

trans has a mental health illness. So

it's actually more than that because

it's 58%. This compares to 13.6%

for non-transgender individuals, which

means you really have to get a little

bit more than one in seven people to

find one mental health illness that has

been diagnosed. Again, is it were

diagnosing trans individuals more or did

they start with more issues and then

become trans? That's unclear.

Transgender patients had statistically

significant astical increase, a

statistically significant increase. Hold

that scientific word wording. Uh in the

prevalence for psychiatric diagnosis

queried with a major depressive disorder

and generalized anxiety disorder being

the most common diagnoses that means 31%

were major depressive disorder victims

or sufferers would probably be the

better word. So this is a big deal and

there's not just information about this

but there is a lot more. Yale goes

deeper and goes in to say that the study

found that transgender individuals who

had received a diagnosis of gender

inongruence were six times more likely

to have mood or anxiety disorders than

the general population, three times more

likely to be prescribed anti-depressants

and anti-anxiety medications, and six

times more likely to attempt suicide

resulting in hospitalizations. The the

problem is that's only six times more

likely to attempt to also now add in

attempt and succeed in suicide which is

bad. It also somewhat suggests that some

of these individuals might be more

disconnected from society and the

consequences of society. Like hey if I

kill Charlie Kirk I might get the death

penalty. Don't care. Don't care about

death. Suicidal anyway possibly. Right

now, what else we've got to look at is

Stanford suggests that people should be

started on transitioning drugs earlier

in adolescence to help minimize some of

those mental health issues. But then

this raises the eyebrows of wait a

minute, are you potentially pushing

people into this part of society that is

just going to lead to a lifetime of

mental health illnesses? So, this is a

counter that a lot of people have to

this Stanford suggestion. uh for

example, I want you to consider not only

what some of the other studies say that

are out there, but also what some of the

drugs do when we talk about depression.

So, the University of Ottawa, they found

that not only could they reiterate a

higher prevalence of mental health and

suicidal behavior in trans individuals,

but they argue that there's something

known as the minority stress theory. And

this is that the experiences uh or or

people who experience or go through

prejudices, negative social experiences

in general can have quote substantial

impacts on both their physical and

mental health. And so when you're

ostracized as somebody who's, you know,

maybe basically like a 1% minority in

society or less, then really it's no

surprise that you're going to have

physical and mental health problems. And

so therefore, it's no surprise that you

would end up being, you know, one in

two, basically one in two individuals

who are trans having mental health

issues diagnosed, not to even mention

the undiagnosed mental health issues

that could be occurring in the trans or

unidentified yet trans community. Like

what if you're a closet trans and it

hasn't been determined yet. Now then you

get into, well, what's going on with

anti-depressants? our drugs and sort of

this medical society that we're in.

Everybody's so willing and excited to

prescribe new drugs these days. I I

personally try my best to stay away

from, you know, chemicals and drugs as

much as possible, but this is this is I

promise you not a sponsor. I just love

that. Okay, Ice Breakers came out with

these. Like, sorry, I'm pitching this. I

think you can still get them at like

Walmart and Target. I promise you it's

not sponsored. Orange Cream Pop. Orange

Cream Pop Ice Breakers. And they

actually taste like orange cream pop.

So yes, I will have some chemicals.

Okay, but anyway, understand this. There

there's a link between hormones and and

anti-depressant drugs that can actually

lead to delusions or other problems.

Like consider this. 8.1% of individuals

who took anti-depressants self- admitted

to Yale that they ended up going into

mania or psychosis, which basically

means that anti-depressant drugs, which

are supposed to make you better, could

end up making you worse and you're more

likely to get these drugs if you're

potentially deemed trans with a mental

health issue. Oh, here's a drug to solve

your problem. I'll give you three

examples of the three most popular

anti-depressants today. Number one,

Zoloft uh found by Case Western to

provoke or exacerbate positive psychotic

symptoms. Positive not meaning it was

good to be psychotic, meaning that yeah,

no, those symptoms are psychotic

positive, which is bad. Little

confusing. Prozac was found by Harvard

to endorse subtle psychotic like

symptoms like quote magical thinking,

unusual perception experiences,

believing others were talking about them

when they weren't, picking up hidden

meanings, and not trusting close

acquaintances. Then you have Lexapro,

which was which is the third one of the

third most popular anti-depressants,

which is thought to cause delirium in

certain children who were given Lexapro,

which is also sad that some children are

given this, like nine-year-olds. It's

crazy. uh and it's a Stafford Shire

University which found that in a

minority of depressed patients, so this

is a smaller percentage but still some

in some depressed patients treatment

with an anti-depressant drug appears to

initiate intense suicidal thoughts and

actions. That's not good. Now, some of

this could actually be because of the

half-life of some of these drugs.

Consider this, the half- lives. By the

way, you can get all my data and the

links to my research on the Meet Kevin

app. Just download the Meek Kevin app on

the Apple or Android app store. You

could customize notifications for things

that I talk about and you can get all my

sort of data. But anyway, Zoloft has a

halfife of 26 hours. Prozac 48 to 96 and

Lexapro 27 to 32. This means if you skip

a day of your meds with Zolaf or

Lexapro, you end up getting this like

rapid rush of negative emotion which

increases suicidal thought. So the

shorter the halflife, the more likely it

is that you're going to get what are

called discontinuation symptoms such as

anxiety, irritability, irritability,

mood swings, and suicidal thought

because those negative thoughts come

rushing into your brain much more

quickly. This is all a problem. So how

does this all potentially relate back to

the Kirkshooter? Well, it relates back

to the Kirkshooter because there's

potentially an association here with

being ostracized in life and having a

transgender partner, but beyond that,

not just living with a transgender

roommate. It's also worth noting that

the individual described himself as a

hick in Mormonsville. It almost seemed

like he was always I mean in some

articles he's described as a meme from

Halloween which is weird. Like it kind

of sounds like he was looking for a home

in community and he was really always

ostracized like kind of like an outcast

in a community and he never really found

home. I mean, there's even talk that he

went to college, but he only ended up

going to college for about a quarter.

Take a look at this Wall Street Journal

piece. Utah State said he attended the

school for just one semester. Sorry, not

a quarter, one semester. More recently,

he he had been enrolled in the

electrical apprenticeship program at

Dixie Technical College, where he is a

third-year student, which is great. I

mean, I'm all for like handson uh you

know, tech and trade skills these days.

When I ran for governor, I ran under we

need more technical and trade skills. I

think this is great. But the thing is,

you could see like he bounces around in

his life. Now, something else that's

really weird as well. I mean, obviously

he was smart enough uh to Yeah, here it

is. Some guy from a meme for Halloween

according to his mother. His mother

called him some guy from a meme

basically. But but understand, it's not

just this. Here's an individual who uh

went to college, couldn't make it at

college, grew up in potentially a small

really religious conservative town, and

maybe he had underlying mental illness

or tendencies that would have aligned

with maybe a transgenderism or, you

know, other sexual desires that wouldn't

align with a highly religious household.

Consider this also. Not only was it the

minister and the father who ended up

turning in uh the Charlie Ko assassin,

Tyler Robinson, but Tyler Robinson is

somebody who's considered to have

previously been a big fan of hunting

with his family. So potentially he was a

good shot. And his mother, this was an

interesting one, was a social worker.

Now this is really interesting because

see, state records show his parents own

a custom countertop business and his

mother is a licensed social worker. and

he grew up hunting. Okay, this is really

interesting. Again, in a small town, so

probably small conservative town, really

strict sort of religious upbringing. Not

saying that's bad or or negative. I'm

just saying if you are one of those rare

people who then has mental health issues

and you're on anti-depressants, you're

really going to get squeezed out of this

society. And then you're trying to call

yourself like, oh yeah, you know, I'm

just a hey, I belonged over there. And

then you go to a Mormon school, it's

like, man, I can't belong over here

either. And it ends up in trade school.

It shows this is a person who's bouncing

around looking for a home, looking for

companionship, right? But his mother

being a social worker, who else was a

social worker? Well, Thomas Matthew

Krooks, the person who shot Donald Trump

in the ear and tried to assassinate

Donald Trump. Tyler or Thomas Matthew

Krooks, both of his parents were social

workers. So then it makes you wonder

like are social workers more likely to

ignore their own children while they're

dealing with other children? Are they

more likely to prescribe the

anti-depressant medication because

that's just what they're used to do? I

don't know that social workers prescribe

that would recommend that to doctors who

then prescribe it. Uh you know, are they

more likely to do things that would

actually end up ostracizing their

children into these sort of situations?

I I don't know. That's pure speculation,

right? Like my goal is always to

separate, hey, here's where we have

data. Here's what we know and then

here's perspective around that. Like for

example, fact, Donald Trump is asking

Congress for $58 million of emergency

funding for protection for the Supreme

Court. Okay, now that's interesting.

Like obviously all of us were like, oh

yeah, you know, hey, there's more

political violence today. Like we want

to make sure the Supreme Court is safe,

right? Of course. Of course we do. And

like nobody wants to see less security

for the Supreme Court. this is a very

important institution for the United

States. That's all like fact. We know

that. But it's also kind of a perfect

time to set up, hey, under the guise of

security, the first people I'm going to

take care of the Supreme Court because,

you know, if you scratch my if I scratch

your back, you know, you better scratch

mine because y'all are about to rule on

tariffs. Okay. Is that like I was

looking at this actually this morning. I

thought this was very interesting. How

often justices voted in favor of each

administration? Uh, Alto 95% for Trump.

Gorsuch 95% for Trump. Kavanaaugh 89%

for Trump. You see where I'm going with

this here? So, even the Supreme Court is

potentially politically biased. These

numbers here are facts. Now, of course,

we don't know like things that don't

come out in public rulings like

emergency hearings and some things that

are just done behind closed doors at the

Supreme Court. We don't know if they're

like hidden descent votes or you know

what other things there could be. But

what we know on actual rulings, we can

look at the facts and go, "Wow, Jackson

never votes for Trump or in favor of

Trump." Not to only votes in favor of

Trump 11% of the time and Kagan votes

26% in favor of Trump. Robert's at 74%.

Now, in terms of when you flip the

script and you look at in favor of

Biden, Jackson, who voted 0% for Trump,

voted 77% of the time for Biden. So, 88%

of the time for Biden, 82% of the time

for Kagan. Roberts was in the middle

here, 53 along with Barrett, 53 for

Biden. And then you look at Alto,

Gorsuch, Kavanaaugh, Thomas, who were

all really, really, really low uh or uh

for, you know, really, really high I

should say for Trump. They were in that

order, 95, 95, 89, 89 for Biden, 18, 29,

41, 18%. So

don't kid yourself. The Supreme Court is

politically biased as well. We know this

factually. This is why it's always a

desire to elect the president of your

party because you know that they're

going to end up at some point appointing

Supreme Court justices and you see them

as sort of a tool for doing what your

party wants. Okay, we know this. This is

old news. But like again, this is where

I give facts and data and and then try

to provide perspective around that. Now,

political violence is ramping up. We

know this. But it's not just political

violence against one side. You know,

Trump will have you believe it's just

radical leftists who are only attacking

right-wingers, but this is happening on

both sides. And it's really important to

consider that. Like, let's consider

political violence for a moment. So, the

Kirk assassination was against a

Republican. The Trump assassination was

against a Republican. J6 that was

against Democratic establishment. Dabby

Gfords, Democratic shooting, that was

2011. More recently, Steve Scaliz, that

was against a Republican. The attack of

the Pelosi house is an attack against a

Democrat. The shootings of Democrat

Hortman, her husband and her fatally

shot. It's an attack against Democrats.

John Hoffman in that same shooting

different uh Democratic uh uh you know

congressional representative shot

survived. They can attack against the

Democrat, right? At the same time,

political violence is up. Like we look

at data and we can see that threats

against congressmen and women are up to

9,474

in 2024 up from 3,939

in 2017. That is quite a lot more. I

mean 9474 divided by 3939 equals 2.4x

of a rise in threats against congressmen

and women. Now, of course, some people

argue that, you know, politicians are

ramping up the the sort of like

temperature in terms of attacking the

other side verbally, leading to

potentially more aggression here. I

actually think one of the big problems

could be artificial intelligence and

algorithms like whether it's YouTube or

Twitch or Twitter or whatever. Uh these

are platforms that tend to promote uh

sort of extreme opinion. When you have

extreme opinion, you get really staunch

supporters and really staunch haters.

And that's how you get dialogue. That's

seen as interaction by the algorithms

and they promote the extreme. People

like me tend to get less engagement

online because what we say is sort of

like you listen to it, you're like,

"Yeah, I mean that all makes sense." You

know, yeah, that's that's reasonable.

And there are going to be Democrats like

that's reasonable. And there going to be

Republicans like that's reasonable.

There are even going to be transgender

people like that's reasonable. You know,

like that doesn't get you yelling at me

Kevin on TikTok, right? So like

unfortunately like that's that's the

downside of providing neutral

information, but it's actually I think

in the long term what is best for

society. That's why I do it, you That's

why I don't go down the rabbit hole of

one side because I just have my own

mental justification that what is best

for the world is just somebody who's

able to look at both sides. In fact,

what we find statistically is that when

people are very ingrained in one side,

they actually tend to misinterpret

people from the other side. So people

who are like super left often

misinterpret that people on the right

are kind of not that different from

them. And then vice versa, like people

on the right are like, "Oh, Democrat,

you know, like they often tend to

misinterpret that, you know, the other

person's not that different." And it

gets worse the more extreme you are to

the left or right, the less interested

you are in even considering the

perspectives of the other side. So this

is all really important because it sort

of helps us understand why political

violence is skyrocketing. Now, don't get

me wrong, political violence has always

occurred. I mean, you could go to the

late 1890s and look through literally

from the late 1890s all the way through

the mid 1900s and black Americans got

slaughtered publicly like lynched during

the Jim Crow era and this was deemed

normal. Okay, this that's crazy and that

was deemed normal. Okay, then you got

MLK Jr. shot, George Wallace shot,

survived, MLK died, uh RFK was shot, not

RFK Jr., uh JFK was shot, right? Uh so

like these are things that have happened

in historically like we have political

violence whether you're an activist or a

president. Onethird of presidents in the

20th century have experienced

assassination attempts and two of them

were killed. Think about that. In a 100

years 33% of our presidents experienced

assassination attempts and two of them

were killed. Then on the flip side, you

have people like Luigi Magelani who he's

basically considered like a folk hero

now for attacking uh and and killing the

father of of you know I think three

children because he was the CEO of

United Health which you know I'm not

here to show for the insurance

companies. I'm just sh saying like it

shows you that to some extent societyy's

kind of like in some cases hell yeah

which is just this weird duality because

right now people are like hell no. In

fact, it's so crazy that in San

Francisco, there's literally a musical

that is booked out called Luigi the

Musical. A tale of love, murder, and

hash browns. San Francisco Bay Area. You

can't make this stuff up. So, yeah, like

these are real issues in our society.

How are we going to solve this?

Extremism spreads more on social media.

How do you prevent that? I don't know. I

don't write the algorithms, right? There

is a link between transgenderism and

mental health problems. Okay, we know

that. And we've got, you know, Trump

kind of using these sort of events to

not only scratch the backs of the people

that he needs help from, but you know,

he also uses stuff like this to win

elections. And this is why usually

politicians

amplify this rather than talking it

down. They kind of amplify this stuff

because ultimately they end up

benefiting by getting votes. By the way,

here's a picture allegedly of the

transgender roommate. It's shared by

Benny. So, you know, I I I'm going to

take it just a little bit with a grain

of salt just because, you know, I'd like

to try to be here in the middle as much

as possible. Uh, and look, there's no

shortage of stuff on the internet here

about this individual. But, uh, let's

just try to keep it as straight as

possible. And hopefully this was

insightful to you. If it was, consider

subscribing. Thank you so much for being

here. We'll see you in the next one.

>> Why not advertise these things that you

told us here? I feel like nobody else

knows about this.

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

see how it goes.

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

much. People love you. People look up to

you.

>> Kevin Pafra there, financial analyst and

YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to

get your take.