TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Stock Market Correction May be Over - Buy?!

26m 4s5,019 words706 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

is the worst over or are we just in the

0:02

middle of the eye of the storm in this

0:04

video we're going to break down three

0:06

different analysts opinions on what's

0:08

actually happening in the economy we're

0:11

going to start with Morgan Stanley

0:13

Morgan Stanley says we're in the eye of

0:15

the storm we're going to go through the

0:17

actual document together and then we'll

0:19

get into the maybe more bullish pieces

0:21

but Morgan Stanley has an interesting

0:23

point of view first of all when you're

0:24

in the eye of the storm it's really

0:26

important to remember what that means

0:28

what it means to be in the eye of the

0:29

storm is is the weather's actually

0:31

really calm see unless you've actually

0:33

lived through a hurricane you might not

0:36

know and that's not your fault but the

0:38

eye of the storm is actually the most

0:39

calm part of a hurricane in fact when

0:42

I've lived through hurricanes as a child

0:44

in Florida during the eye of the storm

0:46

you had like a 30 minute period to go

0:48

outside and there was no rain no wind

0:50

you chat with your neighbors see how the

0:52

first half of the storm went and then

0:53

you go back inside for the second half

0:55

of the storm which depending on which

0:56

side of the storm you were on could be

0:57

worse or better usually that top left is

1:00

the one that spawns all the tornadoes

1:01

and is really bad so it's kind of TVD in

1:04

terms of where we are but enough of the

1:05

analogy let's actually get into the

1:07

document so conversations have talked

1:09

about hey has has the market stabilized

1:11

and is the worst over Morgan Stanley

1:14

actually and here's where they talk

1:15

about the eye of the storm Morgan

1:16

Stanley has a little bit of a negative

1:17

view on this they actually say look the

1:19

market is appropriately selling off

1:21

because as we know valuations are pretty

1:24

high all you have to do is look at the

1:25

S&P PE ratios either trailing or forward

1:28

looking and we're at a historically High

1:30

set of valuations for S&P 500 companies

1:33

it's also worth remembering that 30% of

1:35

S&P 500 revenues come from guess what

1:38

international markets now of course in

1:40

the near term that has led a lot of

1:41

people to say okay I'll just invest in

1:43

the stocks 50 you know Europe's you know

1:45

Blue Chip stocks or all ofest in Chinese

1:47

exposure which honestly has outperformed

1:49

since the beginning of the year but

1:51

other people argue that's just really a

1:53

potential fad right now to diversify

1:55

from the US but remember if the US the

1:58

world's largest economy actually goes in

2:00

the pooper dupers everything could get

2:02

impacted now that said let's see Morgan

2:05

Stanley's taken remember they're going

2:06

to be more of the Bears out of these

2:07

three analysts here so take a look at

2:09

this they say the real slowdown is yet

2:12

to show up in the hard data and they

2:14

think that there's more bad news to come

2:16

ahead mostly because the four things

2:19

that they thought could have been

2:20

potential growth drivers for the United

2:23

States are currently not that would be

2:27

tariffs not a current growth driver

2:29

maybe in the long term Fiscal uh you

2:32

know cutting government spending is not

2:33

a growth driver lack of immigration is

2:35

not a growth driver and deregulation is

2:36

not a growth driver which there at this

2:39

point in the future maybe we'll get

2:41

enough deregulation or we'll get enough

2:43

home Crown manufacturing that will be

2:45

there but that doesn't seem to be the

2:48

near-term case we're still waiting for

2:50

those tax benefits of course but Morgan

2:52

Stanley touches on those as well as some

2:54

of the analysts touch on those as well

2:56

and one of the arguments that we'll end

2:57

up finding is we might need more more

3:00

than just tax cuts at this point and

3:02

this is something that I want you to

3:03

think about going into

3:05

this when you have an economy that is

3:09

slowing usually the way you stimulate a

3:11

slowing economy is by either printing

3:14

more money or taxing less okay so we

3:18

could do that but the Trump tax cuts

3:20

right now are expected to be an

3:22

extension of the 2017 tax cuts which

3:25

means we're not actually getting tax

3:28

cuts by passing an extend of the 2017

3:30

tax cuts we're merely avoiding a tax

3:35

hike and so you'll see one of the

3:36

analysts sends up arguing that we need

3:40

more than just what we had in 2017 to

3:42

stimulate growth in this economy we

3:44

actually need bigger Cuts now whether we

3:46

get those or not remains to be seen keep

3:48

in mind Republicans are expected to pass

3:50

their tax plan through just simple

3:52

budget reconciliation which means they

3:54

only need 51 votes and they're

3:55

filibuster proof if they utilize budget

3:57

reconciliation and in English it's going

4:00

to be really hard for the Democrats to

4:01

block them as long as you know

4:02

Republicans get it done before midterms

4:04

okay fine those are all aspects to

4:06

consider here uh but what else does

4:08

Morgan Stanley tell us well they say

4:11

that right now uh fiscal is

4:14

contractionary as in the government

4:16

isn't going to spend more so we can't

4:18

see this we know that tariffs with April

4:20

2nd looming are probably a downside but

4:24

they could be an upside too right like

4:26

what if Donald Trump comes out bullish

4:28

and we're back to free trade

4:30

fantastic however then we also have what

4:32

Morgan Stanley argues an unappreciated

4:35

drag of immigration sort of a lack of

4:37

immigration into the country which of

4:39

course a lot of folks say hey well just

4:42

you know cares about the immigration

4:43

like Americans can do that job there's a

4:46

small problem with that in that it's

4:48

kind of unlikely that the fired

4:50

government bureaucrats who are now

4:52

potentially looking for work or willing

4:54

to take the jobs that illegal Americans

4:56

were doing and you know vice versa it's

4:59

unlikely that those illegal government

5:01

or those illegal workers were you know

5:03

working for government jobs right so

5:05

they they filled different places of the

5:07

economy so somebody will benefit but

5:09

people might also in the short term be

5:11

interrupted by those disruptions but

5:13

anyway markets substantially

5:15

overestimate both the likely speed of

5:18

deregulation and its ability to push

5:21

growth this is something that I've

5:22

talked about as well before that some of

5:25

the problems with the Trump hope that we

5:26

saw in November that tax cuts probably

5:29

won't really be meaningful for us as if

5:32

we get more tax cuts until 2026 because

5:34

we're already expecting the base cuts

5:36

the new Cuts probably won't be

5:38

beneficial until 26 and deregulation

5:41

also takes quite a while you can start

5:43

slashing government uh you know agencies

5:45

like the Consumer Financial Protection

5:47

Bureau but when do we actually go back

5:49

to you know the ludicrous level of 2006

5:52

I mean that could be a decade from now

5:54

who knows but anyway by the way that's

5:56

going to be a bubble at some point in

5:57

the future if they cut the Consumer

5:58

Financial Protection

6:00

there'll be a huge bubble again at some

6:01

point in the future in lending who knows

6:03

maybe that's what we're seeing in buy

6:05

now pay later right now you know the

6:07

cfpb was trying to reign in buy now pay

6:09

later and now what we're actually doing

6:11

is we're buy now pay lering for our door

6:12

Dash orders which honestly is a little

6:14

bit crazy but whatever we got more of

6:16

this to cover here

6:17

so uh are all of these cries about

6:21

recession overdone probably the

6:23

strongest evidence to date is in the

6:26

Soft Data and we will continue to lean

6:28

on the hard data over the Soft Data so

6:30

even though Morgan Stanley is actually a

6:32

little bit bearish they say they're not

6:35

that bearish that we're going to go into

6:37

a recession this actually somewhat

6:39

bullish if you know some of the more

6:41

bearish arguments of these three pieces

6:42

that we're going to review are coming

6:44

from someone who's actually kind of like

6:47

ah recession is probably overblown at

6:48

this point hey that's actually not that

6:50

bad they say in their forecast the

6:52

meaningful slowing might not show up for

6:55

another quarter but we will be following

6:57

non-farm payrolls data even more closely

6:59

than usual ah you know me labor market

7:02

slowdowns are the last thing that rolls

7:05

over in a recession but what is

7:07

interesting from this Morgan Stanley

7:08

piece is they're arguing hey we might

7:11

not actually see the worst of the data

7:14

until guess when a quarter from now the

7:17

problem with that is in a quarter from

7:20

now that's when we expect to see maximal

7:23

impact from tariffs so if they see signs

7:26

of potential sentiment leading data to

7:28

roll over well when tariffs actually hit

7:30

in April we'd be aligning both of those

7:33

potential negativities the sentiments

7:35

potentially rolling over to hard but

7:37

then actual hard data showing up and

7:39

maybe lower durables purchases we get a

7:41

durables report this week I think it's

7:43

Wednesday uh and and also future heart

7:45

data which all culminates in sort of a

7:47

June ouchy wouch which is also you know

7:51

double this up with what Deutsche Bank

7:53

says which is hey you know in October is

7:56

when we're probably going to see the

7:57

biggest impact from tariffs June just be

7:59

the start that's when you're going to

8:01

have your most economically sensitive

8:03

time so that's important to look at

8:05

because Morgan Stanley is kind of like I

8:06

don't know like we could be done but

8:10

maybe we're just in the middle of it we

8:12

still have another 3 to six months to go

8:14

worth paying attention to and we'll

8:16

align this with some of the others are

8:17

saying as well now I want to get to the

8:19

next piece quick note before I do house

8:22

hack has a non accredited race going I

8:25

haven't posted a full dedicated video

8:27

yet on the on the meet Kevin Channel but

8:29

there's a full one over on the house

8:30

hack homes YouTube channel if you want

8:32

to check that out or just go to hous

8:33

hack.com I plan on making a full

8:36

dedicated video as well but if in the

8:38

meantime you want to get a little bit of

8:39

insights feel free to check these out

8:41

ask us questions send us emails over at

8:43

IR uh house hack.com check out all the

8:47

properties that we have renovated over

8:48

here uh you can click the invest button

8:50

if you're accredited or non accredited

8:52

and you can diversify to real estate

8:54

while earning a 5% yield with downside

8:58

protection and and the upside of a stock

9:01

learn more about that obviously over at

9:03

house act.com and the disclosures

9:04

related to that now let's talk about

9:07

City so City says we're going to get

9:10

some clarity from tariffs around April

9:13

2nd which now we're being told maybe

9:16

maybe just maybe we'll be a little bit

9:18

more targeted maybe we won't get this

9:20

sort of blanket Global tariff set but

9:24

this

9:25

information could do poorly or lead to

9:28

poor results for risk I actually found

9:31

this really interesting because a lot of

9:33

people think that in tariffs are going

9:35

to lead to inflation and that that'll

9:37

lead bonds to do poorly but CI actually

9:40

makes the argument that risk assets like

9:42

stocks or crypto would do poorly and

9:44

bonds would actually do well this is

9:46

interesting to me now I look at some of

9:49

their arguments uh to get a little bit

9:51

of an idea of you know where's where's

9:53

their mindset coming from what what are

9:55

they seeing and first thing I notice is

9:58

they say that if the end goal is 15 to

10:01

10% on tariffs even though we have a

10:05

whole variety of scenarios we're

10:07

probably going to end up somewhere at

10:10

least

10:12

15% and this is what it forms really the

10:15

basis for some of their opinion is okay

10:17

we're going to go into this with about a

10:18

15% tariff on a lot of different

10:21

products as a result they say that risks

10:24

are two-sided and I want to read this

10:27

one because I think this is an

10:28

interesting line of course the market

10:31

has already priced in a tariff shock to

10:33

some extent this is what you hear a lot

10:35

of bulls saying right now oh it's

10:37

already priced in let's go to the Moon

10:39

I'm all for everybody going back to the

10:41

Moon CU I don't want to see pain and

10:42

suffering and I think there are

10:43

opportunities no matter how you invest

10:45

it's actually a lot of what we talk

10:46

about over in the meet Kevin membership

10:48

where you can now get access to every

10:50

single course Alpha report private Liv

10:52

stream trade alert everything all eight

10:55

courses and everything with one small

10:58

daily subscription essentially you can

11:01

see the prices over at meetkevin.com

11:02

it's less than a buck 60 a day go check

11:04

it out you get access to everything

11:05

immediately if you don't like it cancel

11:07

after 30 days no harm no foul but take a

11:09

look at this if people are saying that

11:12

we've already priced in a shock to some

11:14

extent then hey do does it matter like

11:18

let's just buy the dip right they say

11:20

though the experience so far has

11:22

suggested that tariffs are not

11:24

necessarily overly lasting and may

11:26

change if us corporates are getting

11:28

impact too significantly in other words

11:31

if corporations complain then Donald

11:34

Trump is likely to sort of unwind the

11:35

tariffs kind of like what they did with

11:37

the auto tariffs if you remember back to

11:40

when we got our blanket 25% tariff on

11:43

Canada and Mexico with the exception of

11:45

energy they really quickly Exempted cars

11:50

like almost immediately they Exempted

11:52

cars for a month and then they're like

11:54

okay we we'll actually also exclude

11:56

anything usmca compliant and so the

12:00

Trump Administration does react to

12:02

complaints from the industry which is a

12:05

bullish thing right because it it means

12:07

there's some flexibility now the market

12:10

however in their opinion might still

12:12

underappreciate the ultimate negative

12:15

tariff outcome right they say the Tariff

12:18

announcements could turn to be more

12:20

benign than expected maybe because

12:22

tariff gets phased in over a longer

12:23

period of time however there is that

12:26

risk about the markets having

12:28

underpriced and assuming that Trump is

12:30

going to be too accommodative or

12:32

potentially benign with his results and

12:35

therefore City's conclusion here is we

12:37

would rather buyback the market on a

12:40

benign outcome than go very long into

12:42

the Tariff decisions okay let me clean

12:44

that up a little bit because it's a

12:45

little bit of a messy paragraph

12:47

basically they're saying look we're

12:48

going to sit on the sidelines until we

12:50

figure out what the tariffs are mostly

12:52

because even though markets have priced

12:53

in some level of tariffs we don't know

12:55

what the true impact of them is going to

12:58

be

12:59

when it comes to who will underperform

13:01

they say the case for being too cautious

13:03

into tariffs is relatively easy to

13:06

justify so in other words hey totally is

13:08

reasonable to be cautious going into

13:10

this the question of who will

13:11

underperform though is hard to answer in

13:13

2018 it was China and international

13:16

markets which is the opposite of what's

13:17

happening so far right now and the US

13:19

had outperformed literally the opposite

13:21

is happening right now China and

13:22

international are doing better than the

13:23

United States so they reiterate that

13:26

over here and this is why they say we're

13:29

tactically downgrading the United States

13:32

okay interesting so they're not exactly

13:35

the most how would you put it bullish

13:39

but they're also not super bearish

13:40

they're like hey look you know if we can

13:42

get past this we're ready to dive in

13:45

we're ready to get back into the market

13:47

okay good so far I'm not actually seeing

13:50

huge Wall Street Panic you know I think

13:53

when you start seeing Wall Street

13:55

panicking that's probably when you're

13:57

closer to the bottom honestly like but

13:59

all the analysts are mega mega bearish

14:01

that's usually you're signed to buy

14:02

right the contrarian play but anyway

14:04

take a look at this city ends up saying

14:07

that the best asset could end up being

14:10

cash they say cash maintains its

14:12

relative appeal to late last year and

14:16

that our cash allocation is usually the

14:18

residual of the other positions but now

14:21

they're actually interested in being

14:22

bullish on cash and the ability that

14:25

cash provides them it's actually one of

14:26

the reasons why we're offering that 5%

14:28

heal at house Haack because at least on

14:30

the channel a sort of broad a broad

14:33

suggestion uh free financial advice if

14:35

you will like not personalized for you I

14:38

think increasing your cash allocation

14:40

like City says is smart but not only do

14:42

I like the idea of increasing your cash

14:44

allocation I like the idea of increasing

14:47

allocations to things like cash yielding

14:51

private equity and Equity that's outside

14:54

of some of the bubbly sectors like I

14:57

kind of think real estate

14:59

is a deal right now and will continue to

15:02

be a really good deal that's why we're

15:04

hoarding cash at house act because we're

15:06

going to go shopping in Q3 Q4 when most

15:08

people are panicking that their listings

15:10

haven't sold and inventory is flooded

15:12

and we're going to be able to shoot fish

15:14

in a barrel you get to be a part of that

15:16

if you invest in house act house act.com

15:18

uh and you get the 5% yield on top of

15:20

that so it's kind of diversifying away

15:22

from the stock market you get a yield

15:24

and you're going into sort of uh what

15:27

what a lot of people see as an

15:28

undesirable sector right now which is

15:30

usually what I want to be buying when

15:31

nobody else wants to right so that's

15:33

what we're going to be doing Q3 Q4 so

15:36

Cash Cash yielding assets this makes

15:38

sense but what does Goldman Sachs tell

15:40

us so unfortunately I'm a Goldman Sachs

15:42

piece my highlights disappeared but I'll

15:44

go through the highlights anyway because

15:46

I've got a lot of memorized because I

15:47

didn't read it too long ago so first of

15:50

all Tony who is the sort

15:53

of Chief hedge fund coverage strategist

15:57

or whatever you want to call them over

15:58

at Goldman sa has a few opinions first

16:00

he says the economy slowed down but

16:03

growth has not collapsed like you cannot

16:06

call right now A recession a lot of

16:09

people disagree with that a lot of

16:10

people say right now I feel like I'm in

16:11

a recession that's bull crap and I think

16:14

there are a lot of reasonable arguments

16:16

to be made that we're actually

16:17

experiencing a rolling recession like

16:19

Kathy Woods says right now

16:22

however Goldman Sachs you know Tony here

16:25

suggests that uh you know growth so far

16:29

far like the hard data isn't showing us

16:31

falling off a cliff which is very

16:32

similar to what jome Powell told us at

16:34

the fomc meeting this week I haven't

16:36

seen the data yet to say we're

16:37

definitely falling off a cliff the worst

16:39

thing that we actually face right now

16:41

are multiples you know multiples on the

16:43

S&P 500 are are sitting you know in

16:45

excess of 24 25 26 somewhere in that

16:47

range uh and and if you look at the cape

16:50

Schiller ratio either of those

16:52

statistics we're at like all-time highs

16:54

on valuations now yes markets have come

16:57

down but only about 5% or 10% off these

17:00

crazy all-time highs you know for the

17:03

broader indices some stocks more more

17:06

dramatically uh and the more dramatic

17:08

moves are really a sign of what can

17:11

happen when PE compress again to some

17:14

extent as an example Tesla was a little

17:18

overbought I think everybody can agree

17:20

with that going to 480 a little

17:22

overbought uh and that's not to say

17:24

anything bad about Tesla it's just to

17:25

say he got got a little euphoric there

17:28

after the Trump win and basically Elon

17:30

you know buying his way into the White

17:31

House there's a lot of enthusiasm around

17:33

what that could mean for the future of

17:34

self-driving and Manufacturing or

17:36

otherwise but eventually pees you know

17:39

multiples valuation multiples tend to

17:41

compress and so Tony argues that the

17:43

entire Market actually has a little bit

17:46

of an overweight uh uh position and he

17:50

says that while Traders may have removed

17:53

their allocations a lot of longer term

17:55

holders what he calls structural holders

17:58

like households who are really exposed

18:01

to stocks right now highest exposure in

18:03

history to stocks right now households

18:06

who are overweight to

18:08

equities and aren't trading are actually

18:11

overallocated to stocks and they haven't

18:13

trimmed High valuations yet they've kind

18:15

of just taken the bleed so yeah people's

18:18

portfolios have gotten hid and that

18:19

might be you where you're like damn yeah

18:21

man I mean I I had stocks at you know

18:24

125 pounds here you know 480 Tesla or

18:27

whatever and I was looking at my

18:28

portfolio like DN not pretty good you

18:30

now it's like it's still good but it not

18:32

as good as it

18:33

was this this is fine but Tony makes the

18:37

argument that you really get this true

18:40

panic when the structural sellers start

18:43

selling and so far what we have are

18:45

structural people still buying

18:47

households and people broadly by

18:49

by which is

18:51

fine anyway irrespective of the market

18:54

bias when you take a half a step back

18:56

it's stunning how much is going on right

18:57

now and even if implied volatility has

19:00

settled down the market continues to

19:01

metabolize a huge range of significant

19:04

variables the result is a trading

19:06

environment that is profoundly different

19:08

from the past few years to say nothing

19:10

of entire blocks of time what follows

19:14

from the point the post GFC period was

19:17

dominated by unbounded fed policy fiscal

19:20

spending and UND unrivaled US tech

19:24

preeminence all right basically saying

19:27

look we're going into this en

19:28

environment where you don't have that

19:30

fiscal spending anymore Tech dominance

19:33

maybe come into a question a little bit

19:34

and the FED isn't supporting you this

19:36

sounds a whole lot like what Morgan

19:38

Stanley said over here in their four

19:41

kind of issues if you will now something

19:44

that I thought was really interesting

19:46

about Tony was Tony over here in

19:49

paragraph number six says holy smokes

19:52

the me Kevin membership is a great deal

19:54

check it out over at meetkevin.com

19:55

before me Kevin raises the price on the

19:58

members ship and if you get in now you

20:00

lock in that low price forever so in

20:03

other words if you want to lock in that

20:05

low subscription now before we raise the

20:09

price of that subscription you're

20:10

guaranteed the lowest price of that

20:12

subscription and you keep it we're not

20:14

going to raise that existing

20:16

subscription price on you only new

20:19

subscribers would have to pay more so

20:20

check that out over M kevin.com now what

20:23

Tony actually says is whatever your

20:25

Market view I'd remain flexible on where

20:28

this all leads here I'll invoke the

20:31

wisdom of Jesse Livermore when you're

20:33

doing nothing those speculators who feel

20:35

they must trade day in day out or laying

20:38

the foundation for your next venture

20:40

where I'm going with that is the year is

20:42

not yet 25% complete and the degree of

20:45

difficulty is very high so the

20:47

preservation of capital is as important

20:49

as anything else right now this line

20:52

right here coming from Goldman Sachs you

20:54

know hedge fund coverage like head of

20:56

hedge fund coverage is pretty powerful

20:58

is they're basically like you have a

21:00

hedge fund telling you we're like

21:02

focusing on preservation of capital

21:04

right now over trading now that's in

21:06

part what we've been

21:07

doing at least you know what I've been

21:09

doing and talking about uh in the course

21:11

member live streams where I I'm a little

21:14

bit more choosy with my trades last week

21:16

we had an S&P 5 or sorry it was a NASDAQ

21:19

100 play that went up like

21:21

125% in the 40 minutes after my alert on

21:24

it which is amazing and I took great

21:27

profits on it hopefully you were able to

21:28

take great profits on as well you get

21:29

those alerts on the me Kevin membership

21:31

mind you but uh there's certainly fewer

21:34

trades going on right now because you

21:35

have to be more careful in this

21:37

environment and I think that's what

21:39

Goldman Sachs is saying as well it's

21:41

like ah we you know we want to hold that

21:43

cash that optionality which makes it a

21:45

hard time for a lot of the AI companies

21:49

or the tech companies to really raise

21:51

money again this is where I think

21:53

there's a really good opportunity to get

21:55

a steal of a deal on companies that are

21:56

exposed to real estate like house but

21:58

they again I'm I'm a little bit biased

22:01

and I think we're actually selling the

22:02

shares for a wedge deal for buyers you

22:04

could learn all about that and what our

22:05

Wall Street valuation is when we as we

22:07

were ready to IPO you know we got

22:10

evaluation from Wall Street you could

22:11

learn all about that over at house

22:13

act.com or watch the video over at house

22:15

homes on it uh and if you want you can

22:17

always join me in a live stream as well

22:18

and ask questions about it but anyway

22:21

Tony makes this argument that you know

22:23

it's it's hard to know right

22:26

now where the Trump Administration is

22:28

going to go with tariffs and this is a

22:31

pretty big line ready for this look at

22:33

this right here the US consumer shows

22:36

that survey sentiment surveys look like

22:39

dirt and the pressures on low-end

22:42

consumers are

22:43

accumulating however again the high-end

22:45

consumer is holding things stable so

22:48

what's going on is it weather is it not

22:51

is is GDP going to go down to 1.9% or is

22:53

it going to go negative who knows but

22:56

there's a lot to talk about here and I

22:58

think when you put all of this together

23:00

what you kind of have is Morgan Stanley

23:02

City and Tony over at Goldman Sachs

23:05

they're all kind of neutral they're kind

23:08

of in the middle like H we got cash we

23:11

don't know what to do with it shout out

23:13

by the way to whoever has this plushy

23:14

Max gave it to me and uh we call it the

23:17

good luck plushy I don't even know what

23:19

it's from I mean I'm sure it's from some

23:20

kind of game but anyway thanks Max good

23:24

luck but uh yeah what's interesting is

23:27

all three of them are kind of

23:31

like it's not going to be that bad I

23:35

think but we like cash and

23:39

bonds yeah I agree like I want to be

23:43

bullish but I'm kind of like cash and

23:46

bonds that's why we're doing bonds at

23:48

house right and I put $5 million of my

23:50

own money into house I'm like oh that's

23:51

a good deal right now I put some into

23:53

that and some into treasury bonds and

23:55

some into cash right that's how I like

23:57

my portfolio allocated right now I can't

24:00

wait to go buy the D again I just don't

24:01

think that right now is that opportunity

24:03

that doesn't mean I'm bearish I'm just

24:04

bullish on other things anyway so uh

24:08

then Tony makes this argument that

24:12

what's interesting about the episode

24:14

relative to this one when you compare to

24:16

2018 is all of the differences in 2018 I

24:20

hate the phrase different you know this

24:22

time is different in 2018 the market

24:24

came to believe that the FED policy put

24:26

was much further out than thought

24:27

basically Powell rolled earlier than

24:29

thought the problem now is because of

24:31

the uncertainties we don't actually know

24:34

when we're going to get the power put

24:35

the Power put could come a lot later

24:37

than we expect now it probably will

24:39

arrive at some point but it could be too

24:41

late things could have already gone

24:42

quite poopy by then so I I don't know uh

24:46

it's going to be really interesting but

24:48

uh all I know is we're raising cash and

24:50

we're going to buy houses and have cash

24:53

for optionality uh we've already raised

24:55

over seven figures by the way for house

24:56

Haack congratulations to all the house

24:58

Haack investors there are a lot of

24:59

firsttime investors who are investing

25:02

more money because they want the 5%

25:04

yield uh and they want the downside

25:06

protection they want the upside as well

25:10

uh again you can learn all about that at

25:11

house hack.com and I'll put a link uh

25:14

down below to uh to a private live

25:17

stream that we're going to be doing uh

25:20

probably right before I post this video

25:23

so you can watch it back on 2x if you

25:25

want it's sort of like a free sample if

25:27

you will of kind of what like a course

25:29

member live would be like plus Q&A and

25:31

Market commentary so uh this is sort of

25:34

the kind of live stream that we like to

25:35

do daily in the course member live

25:37

streams as part of the meet Kevin

25:38

membership so I'll put a free sample as

25:40

a pin comment down below and in the top

25:42

of description thanks so much for being

25:43

here folks we'll see you in the next one

25:44

goodbye and good luck out there do not

25:46

advertise these things that you told us

25:48

here I feel like nobody else knows about

25:50

this we'll we'll try a little

25:51

advertising and see how it goes

25:52

congratulations man you have done so

25:54

much people love you people look up to

25:55

you Kevin PA there Financial anst

25:58

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

26:00

your take

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.