wow, this Supreme Court decision is a WIN for Trump.

W this might actually be a win for

Donald Trump now there might be someone

the left who are upset at me covering

this but my goal is to cover everything

neutrally and as in the middle as

possible and take a look at this as

we've published here on ec.com this is

probably a win for Trump now I want to

apologize that previously I posted a

video that was mis a misunderstanding of

the news that broke I thought there was

a ruling on the Colorado case that's

entirely my fault uh for that I

apologize it was rectified very very

quickly and therefore we are now posting

this video and an update also is on eack

clarifying exactly what's going on so

Jack Smith in the Trump indictment

number three was basically just issued a

loss to catch you up to speed Donald

Trump basically got indicted for

obstructing an official US proceeding

you can actually see that original

indictment right here see on ec.com it

says link to original case number three

my goal is to make it very easy and

simple for you and look oh wow

conspiracy to defraud the US conspiracy

to obstruct an official proceeding

obstruction of an attempt to obstruct

official an official proceeding and

conspiracy against rights now special

Council Council Ja Jack Smith stumbling

over my words I guess I need some more

coffee here special Council Jack Smith

was hoping to speed up extinguishing

Donald Trump's immunity claim

in this indictment number three see if

Donald Trump wins an immunity claim the

entire indictment number three might be

thrown out because essentially Donald

Trump would be arguing I can't be held

criminally accountable for those things

you just alleged because as president I

was immune to any of those

claims now that's really just a

defensive claim against that lawsuit so

it's kind of like you've got a case

going and then this tangent pops up that

says well this doesn't apply anyway

because I'm immune and so now there's a

negotiation going around on that tangent

not on the actual case it's on the

tangent which obviously relates to the

case because if you win the tangent the

case goes away so Donald Trump is

pushing for that Jack Smith is like look

ordinarily we would have to appeal this

tangent because judge Jen she already

denied that right she already denied

that Donald Trump was immune so Donald

Trump uh appealed and he like no I think

I am immune and Jack Smith is like look

this is just going to end up going to

the federal court of appeals and then

it's going to end up at the Supreme

Court why don't we just cut the Chase

and get it to go to the Supreme Court so

we can get things moving along Donald

Trump is like whoa whoa whoa whoa don't

take away my right to do process it's my

right to appeal to a federal appeals

court and then if we want to appeal

their ruling then we can appeal to the

Supreme Court and the Supreme Court

Accord and just a oneline decision today

decided yeah Trump's right here so

that's actually a win for Trump that no

no no no Jack Smith you can't speed this

up it needs to go to the appeals court

first to a federal appeals court first

now that will be done and arguments will

be heard starting January 9th and we

have no idea how long the appeals court

is going to take if they make a decision

pretty quickly within a week or two then

this will be probably right back at the

Supreme Court's desk pretty quickly but

the Supreme Court just kick this can

down the road and said look we're not

getting involved until you actually

follow the way the system is supposed to

work Jack Smith is like yo but we have a

court date like a trial date set for

March 4th which happens to be the day

before super Tuesday which is a very

politically important day and the

Supreme Court basically in denying Jack

Smith and judge Shin's request to speed

this up basically says we don't care

what your trial date is follow the law

if the law says after a judge denies

something that you appeal it goes to a

federal court a federal appeals court

since this is a federal case so that's

the process we're going to take so

obviously Donald Trump and the Trump

Camp are going to Brand this as a big

win because quite frankly it is because

it could have been a loss and not having

a loss is in essence a win right so it

is a win for Trump

now in sort of as neutral as a possible

manner it's worth noting that that

should be true for everyone if some

prosecutor was coming after you and you

appeal a judge's decision that

prosecutor shouldn't be able to skip

layers just because they want to get the

trial with over faster so I actually

think this was the right decision by the

Supreme Court they're not directly

supporting Donald Trump they're directly

supporting the right to do process but

Donald Trump is going to Brand this as

ha Supreme Court sides with Trump on

t-shirts and advertising right over the

holidays and Christmas and everything so

oh snap great opportunity for Donald

Trump now usually at least political

argues that appeals courts are generally

very slow in fact here they argue

appeals courts have a reputation for

being slow however they argue that

they've been moving a lot faster on

Trump related issues probably because we

know we're in the midst of an election

cycle here so another thing to keep in

mind now something else that you could

watch for as we continue to update

information on ec.com uh well a couple

things now you can also uh link to

individual posts so if you want to go in

here and share for example one of these

original uh individual post you could do

that and it'll pull you right to the

story which is kind of cool because

let's just say you're over here at the

Colorado presents real problems for the

Supreme Court piece which you'd have to

scroll down quite a bit for you could

just write click copy that link uh

directly uh so you know we'll copy link

address right here and then let's say

you're scrolling around on some other

website I don't know let's just say

you're you're for some reason on the New

York Times or the Wall Street Journal

whatever and then you're like oh I want

to share this link with somebody boom it

takes you right down to that section

really fast it's kind of cool pretty

excited about it so check that out at

ec.com and I'll keep posting more

updates over there as well quick side

note freebie as well Nick T did post

something pretty cool uh and I'm just

going to mention that really quickly in

this video because even though I know

this is a politics video I figure I want

to let everybody know what Goldman Sachs

just said which Nick T just tweeted out

he's the Nikki leaks guy the guy that is

often considered The Whistleblower of

whatever the FED is doing so if the the

FED says something hey we're seeing this

he tweets it and he works for the Wall

Street Journal take a look at this us

daily couldn't inflation fall below 2%

from Goldman Sachs and Nick well Goldman

Sachs is arguing that with November's

inflation reports and they're

accompanying revisions in hand we now

see a below 2% core PC inflation report

plausible in like plain English it's

basically saying look we might actually

be under the fed's target way faster

than we think which might mean that

interest rates could come down way

faster than we previously thought kind

of cool something to pay attention to

and of course subscribe for more thanks

so much goodbye can not advertise these

things that you told us here I feel like

nobody else knows about this we'll we'll

try a little advertising and see how it

goes congratulations man you have done

so much people love you people look up

to you Kevin P there financial analist

and YouTuber meet Kevin always great to

get your

take