Logics and Opposition Rule

All right guys, from my last video where

I spoke about what is liquidity. I told

you guys at the end of the video to tell

me the next topic you would like me to

talk on. All right. So let me know in

the comments what you guys would love to

learn in the next class. Let me know if

you guys will want me to actually most

of you guys actually said exertion

imbalance zone and momentum imbalance

zone. However, this is not a video where

I will talk about that. And the reason

is that when it comes to HRC, what

differentiates HRC from every other

concept from support and resistance, SMC

and all the core value of HRC is in

participants. Getting to read

participants know if either buyers or

sellers are at a high or low. Every

other thing after that is actually very

easy because with that you'll be able to

you know pick your liquidity easily,

pick your zones easily, read buyers

imbalance zone easily, readers imbalance

zone easily. So it is very important

that I have to release like three more

videos before the zone videos. Why?

Because I need to talk more on your

signals. you need to ensure that you

guys are actually doing the right thing

when it comes to having your signals

when it comes to accurately writing

signals. Okay. So it is very very

important. So for this particular video

what I will be talking about will be

opposition rule and the next video after

this I'll be talking about opposition

rule and quadrant rule. All right. After

that I will tie everything up about

signals. Then from there I can now

release the video on zones and do not

forget that you need to subscribe to

ensure that you don't miss any of these

videos. Like and of course share with

your friends and maybe even with your

enemies so that they can benefit from

it. So in a nutshell, I will go into

opposition rule. But one thing I would

love to do is to actually tell you guys

what opposition rule is doing and when I

get to quadrant rule as well, I'll also

tell you guys the work of quadrant rule.

Now what is opposition rule? What does

it answer? So before we go to the chart

and before we talk about position rule,

we need to understand what opposition

rule actually answers. All right. What a

positional rule answer to is to niche

down our time frames. What do I mean by

our time frames? In the past, I've seen

questions like where do I get my daily

time frame signal? Is it from 1 hour? Is

it from 1 minute? Is it from 15 minutes?

Is it from 5 minutes? Some will say I

even try 30 minutes, it seems as though

it works. I try 4 hour, it seems as

though it works. and up. The reality is

that the footprint of participants let's

say your daily participants for example

their footprints is everywhere can be

anywhere or in the lower time frame at

any day in time. So it is not fixed.

There is no holy grail time frame that

used to reach participants. You don't

just pick 1 minute randomly 15 minutes

randomly and just say yes 15 minutes is

what I will stick to. It will always

give me the correct thing and anything I

see there will be the correct thing. No,

with that yes, you will be accurate to

submit them, but you won't be much more

accurate as you should be in reading

your participants and actually

registering your participant signals if

you do not know about opposition rule.

So what opposition rule does is that it

niches down the time frames that you are

to work with. That is with opposition

rule we will be able to neglect some

time frames. I will know that oh 15

minutes time frame I don't want to deal

with you. uh 5 minutes time frame that

is what price is using today that is

what is conclusive in my signal

registration in my participants

registration today all right or for this

week or for this session all right so it

is very important to note that so your

15 minutes time frame your 1 hour time

frame can be the one that will work

conclusively on a particular day so

opposition helps you know the time frame

you are not to go with at all at every

point in time on daily basis. So this

particular day your position rule will

let you know that oh you shouldn't go

with 15 minutes time frame today go with

1 minute instead go with 1 hour instead

to register your participants and for

your let's say weekly participants as

the week opens 1 hour even down to 1

minute might not be conclusive you will

understand that in a short while when I

start uh talking about them so it might

not be conclusive all of them might not

be conclusive it might be 4 hour or even

daily time frame that will be conclusive

to register the time frame of your

weekly participants during the week open

or for a certain week that you are

trying to register that has happened in

the past. All right. So it is very

important to understand the effect and

the importance of opposition rule and

that is why it has to be taught first.

All right. Then we'll now talk later

about quadrant rule. Why? Because after

applying your position rule, you can

have two time frames that are conclusive

but are finally saying different things

that is based on frequency. One maybe

your lower time frame might conclusively

say that buyer and then later flip to

seller and conclusively that is it is

true for that lower time frame say 1

minute time frame for example. But when

you now get to maybe 4hour time frame,

4hour time frame might be conclusive as

well and 4 hour time frame might just

say buyer. All right. So in that case

both of them are very correct. 4 hours

says buyer as a participants 1 minute

time frame says buyer first and then

they flip to sellers. So the question is

which one should you finally go for at

the point where price flip to seller. So

that is where quadrant now come into

place. That is where we have three

movement of participants and another

participants taking over. That is four

movement. All right? And one movement on

the higher time frame that is on the

4hour time frame in our case example

that we use. So the question is which

one conclusively will you go for all

right based on frequency balance and

all. So that is what quadrant rule will

do for you. But in this video, I'm much

more interested in talking about

position rule and to tell you about the

logic to use at every point in time. So

pay blue to your screen. Don't forget to

like, subscribe, and share. Do you don't

want to enjoy this value alone? And of

course, let's dive into the chat. Good

day everyone. Welcome to the

this is very important to ensure that we

have coition and there is agreement in

the arrival or conclusion that every

individual that trace HRC to ensure that

everyone comes to the same conclusion

and this is the signal practical class.

For the signal practical class, you you

need to understand that signal is the

most subjective part of HRC. Signal, I

repeat, is the most subjective part of

HRC. But there is one way, one single

way to actually make it objective. There

is one single way to make signal

objective. And that one single way is to

understand that there are a lot of

logic, a whole lot of logic when it

comes to signal. A whole lot of logic

that you can use to actually get signal.

But each of this logic must arrive at

one thing. And the only way we can make

them to come together as one where

everyone can agree on I am seeing this

as liquidity. I am not seeing this as

liquidity. I am seeing this as that and

all is true only one major rule. And the

first rule we'll be looking at is the

rule that governs from daily

participants up to yearly participants.

For sessional, we'll be doing that in

the next practical class because it's um

sessional overlaps. All right, because

you have New York opening when London

and Brford are still opened. So

sessional overlap. But when it comes to

from daily and above, it is binary. So

what do I mean by it is binary? It is

binary in the sense that it is binary in

the sense that a day closes before a no

day opens. A month closes

before you can say a new month opens. We

cannot say we are still in June and then

July now opens. No, it is binary. One

has to go off before the other one comes

on. But for sessional it is not binary.

Even while Tokyo is still horn,

Frankfurt opens. Even while London and

Frankfurt are still Horn, two sessions

are still Horn, New York opens. So that

is not binary. That means one session is

not switched off always before another

session switches on and that is what

will make the rule that governs the

sessional signal different. But from our

daily session up to the yearly session,

we have a binary notion zero and one,

off and on, up and down. That is one

closes before the other opens. So it is

more like a switch.

One closes before the other opens. And

that makes that easy, interesting and

straightforward. Now what is the rule

that therefore now governs how you

register your signal? Before we go to

the singular rule that makes every way

every approach of registering signal

before we go to that one rule that makes

it valid. We will first deal with

different logic that I have seen some of

my students use or that I personally I

have used and in fact we can still have

more logic of registering signal beyond

each of these that I will label. But one

thing to note is that when you are using

any of this logic to register a signal

on a particular time frame, the singular

rule that will make everything to be

objective at the end of the day, that

singular rule is what will bind every

logic that any of you might want to use

based on the one that you think is much

easier for you, based on the one that

you think you understand better In the

end, absolutely 100% of the time,

everyone will arrive at the same signal.

That is all the subjectiveness

based on different logics that could

have been used in registering signal.

All of the subjectiveness is now limited

to just one thing. Which means that

single rule even if you are using any

time frame at all 1 minute, 1 hour, 15

minutes, 5 minutes, 4hour time frame,

even 8 hour time frame, the reality is

you will come to the same thing as

someone that uses another time frame. In

as much such person or both of you

individually registers your signal on

the same logic number one and also align

your final conclusion to the rule that

will be discussed. All right. So without

further ado let's dive into different

logics that we have and registering

signals. Number one, the closing range

logic.

What is the closing range logic? The

closing range logic states that the last

candle on the time frame you want to use

to register your signal that is if I

want to register the participants for my

daily time frame or for my daily

participants. If I want to register the

signal for heat on 1 hour time frame for

example or even on 1 minute time frame

or on 15 minutes time frame. the last 15

minutes candle from the previous day

that is the last 15 minutes let's say it

is 15 minutes time frame now that is

where I'm looking at at the moment 15

minutes time frame TF if this is the

last candle that was formed on that 15

minutes on from the previous day now we

will represent our new day as a broken

vertical line so this is the new day

hope now presently as when this video is

made. New day opens on futures chart

around 11 p.m.

So this is our 15 minutes time frame.

This is the last candle that was formed

on that 15 minutes time frame. The

closing range logic says that the low of

that last 15 minutes time frame

candle from the previous day and its

high

is the opening range high and is the

opening range low respectively.

That is what this logic that is what it

registers.

The low and high of the closing candle

is the opening range high and it is also

the opening range low respectively.

Meaning that if the new day opens

as an insider bar, that is a candle

that did not read either of these.

Neither does it read this the opening

range low, then there is no signal yet

according to this logic or signal

registration.

Even if the next candle also does the

same, maybe even clear the open range

candle high, there is still no logic

yet, no signal registration yet.

According to this logic, either the high

or the low of the closing candle from

that time frame you are using to

register must be rated according to this

logic.

Therefore, if it's clear the open range

high first, then you register that

buyers are in control.

Mind you, also according to this logic,

you remember that the open range high

and the open range low is the high and

low of that 15 minutes candle. Which

means it is not the swing low. It is not

this swing low that was formed. Even

though yes we now have buy signal that

determine the open range low has been

rated. No, according to this particular

logic, this logic states that until the

closing candle low is rated before you

can assume that the open range law has

been rated based on the closing range

logic CRL

let's call it CRL

and therefore the swing that is now

formed after that automatically

becomes the open range. target. Oh,

and as this low becomes in as much a new

day as not opened, if ready becomes the

flip point and then you continue the

logic. But the logic majorly says that

strictly the closing candle high and the

closing candle low is your opening range

and opening range low respectively.

So even if the open ranger is rated, the

low of this

is not the low of this guy is not the

open range low. That is if the low of

this is rated your own opening range

low. If you are using this P logic, your

own opening range low is not rated yet.

Even if the swing low that was first

formed is rated, your opening range low

is not rated yet until the low of that

15 minutes candle, the last 15 minutes

candle, the closing 15 minutes candle

from the previous day or from the

previous week or from the previous month

or from the previous year depending on

which of them which of their signal you

are trying to register

before you can say that your open range

low has been rated. head.

This is logic one.

Remember, you are to be very consistent

when it comes to your logic.

The next logic we will discuss is the

C

close open logic and this is the common

one and I think the one I taught in the

major signal video. All right. But that

does not make you superior. No logic is

superior than the other. That is one

thing I want you to note. The major

thing is you have to be consistent based

on the final rule that link all logic by

the time we look into them.

So basically the close open logic what

does it say? The close open logic says

that

to register the first signal at all

either

of the closing candle high

or the closing candle low. Either of

them must be readed first before you can

say the signal that you have a signal.

But what makes it closing open logic is

now that the story continues from the

alternating swing low or swing eye that

is formed after the open.

That is what that logic says. That is

what differentiate it from this logic.

What do I mean by that? That is at the

open if price clear the high first

this logic registers is as

buyers intense

buyers in control. But to continue the

story this logic dynamically shift which

means in that case what is rated first

determines the reference to the closing

candle. Since the eye of the coin candle

is rated first, we assume it to be the

open range high. But the closing candle

in this case, its low is not the opening

range low in this particular case.

That's what differentiates this from

logic one. The opening candle low that

is the swing low. The lowest low that

was formed after the open is what

automatically carry the open range low

which is this particular low that you

see here. Which means according to this

logic once this is rated that is the

open range low.

That is the open range low and therefore

according to this logic price coming

here is now the whole RT

without it reading the low of the

closing candle.

But there is something that makes the

CRL better than the CO

which I need to mention before we even

bring everything together.

When we are registering both the

aggressor and the passive, the issue

here is that at the aggressor if we have

something like this whereby price turn

back without reading the open range low

without reading the low of the closing

candle. But let's say at the passive

both the low the the swing low glow

formed at the open was raided and also

the the low of the closing candle too

was raided. Meanwhile, when you are

registering for the aggressor, what you

saw is something like this that made you

register for the aggressor

that his price turned back without

reading the low

of this guy, without reading the low of

the candle. But when you are registering

using in your own mind, you are using

the C. You are still using the C. But

with what the aggressor is showing,

price raided both the swing low that was

formed after the open and also it raided

the low of the closing candle at the

passive.

This your logic will not be consistent.

Then this co logic will not be

consistent

in that regard. There is a reason by

time we talk about the final rule that

link everything. There is a reason why

you have to note this which is why it is

very important now to pick the easy and

consistent logic. In my own advice to

advise headache like this I would say go

for CRL

I mean if I'm to pick between the two

because this is easy every single time I

always have this case even if this

happen let's say price clear the swing

low of this I know that in my logic

since my RL of the closing candle has

not been readed I know that I will not

register anything yet That is better

than registering at my aggressor

registering this already as

continuing my flip from there. But at

the passive I'm having a case where

price raid both the swing low that was

formed after the opened first and yet

also raided the low of the closing

candle. That will bring about what? That

will bring about overlapping of logic.

All right. It is very important to note

that. So if you are going for your CEO

H, you have to consider that when you

are registering your passive, did this

happen? Did price read both the swing

low and the closing candle low at my

passive. Therefore, I need to

immediately cancel out my C logic if

that is the case at the passive. And I

have to deploy CRL logic for both of

them so that I can have cohesion and

agreement in my signal analysis.

I hope that makes sense. That is

basically

what CRL is, what C is. Then another

logic is the

open open range logic.

Oh hell.

What is our opening range logic? Open

range logic is the logic whereby

the high and low of the opening candle

that is price has already opened. In

this logic there is no reference at all

to the closing candle

at all. In this case, this person or

whoever is using this logic is saying

that the high and the low of the first

open candle is their own opening range

high

and opening range low respectively. That

is what this logic is about is their own

opening ranger opening that is they they

don't have anything

to do with the closing candle. They

interested in the opening candle and

they interested in the high and low of

the first candle on that time frame that

is in this case 15 minutes time frame.

They're interested in the high and low

of the opening candle to be their own

open range high and low. Which means if

the next candle has not swept that is

the second candle after the open did not

sweep any of this yet. There is no

signal for them yet. And also if we

sweep let's say the low first then there

is a signal sellers. And also for them

it is until price reach the high of the

opening candle that is when they know

that opening range high has been raided

and then their opening range target will

now be this low. The swing low that is

formed and their flip point will

therefore now be this high.

That right there is opening

range logic

or opening candle logic maybe OCL or

opening range logic or RL any one you

want to call it. The major thing is to

understand each of this logic. Another

interesting logic

is this the open price logic OPPL.

OPPL is also the bar chart logic.

B charts logic.

OPPL is also equivalent to the bar chart

logic because this one is easily much

more read by using the bar chart instead

of the candlestick. If you use your

candlestick too, you can read it well.

Yes, because of course a bullish candle

that has upper shadow and lower shadow.

If it is a bullish candle, it means that

it goes down first before going up.

That is the implication. If it has both

if it is a bearish candle and it has so

let me say that if is a bearish candle

and it has both upper shadow and lower

shadow it means that it goes up first

before going down. But you can clearly

and you know neatly read this one by

switching your charts to the bar chart.

Because your bar chart consist of just

open,

low,

high,

close. This is how your bar chart is.

Open,

low,

high,

close. So that one shows the skeleton

of your candle or the skeleton of price.

All right. So which means if it is a

bullish in this case this is a bullish

candle that is a bullish candle is not

by color. A bullish candle simply means

that price opens at a lower range and

closes at aper range. That is the

implication.

That is what a bullish candle is. All

right. So this is a bullish candle. So

opens goes to the low first. So which

means from the opening price. So for the

open price logic now such person is

using exactly the opening price. In this

case this person is using the open

price. Let's say the opening price is 1

and this is also the insider logic. This

exactly is also the incyber logic. That

is why you need to understand that in

cyber logic this is a different logic

entirely.

This is your incar logic. This is also

what leads to your house cyber logic.

Outside bar inside bar all of them are

inside this barat logic. They are one.

So it is either you do it or you don't

do it. In fact with all of these you

don't need to separate your outside bar

from your inside bar. If you are using

the open price logic, it covers

everything automatically. So let's say

the opening price is 1.07

1 9.

Let's say that is the open price 1.07

one 9. So this logic is saying that if

price traded lower that is if is a

bullish candle it means price goes low

first. If price traed lower first goes

down first from our 1.0719

if it has a lower week and price go

lower first it means price has already

gone down that is below the opening

price is the low in this case this one

is not referencing high and low it is

referencing price below the opening

price 1.0719 0719.

This one is saying that is sellers

intent already. That is if price just

move a little even if it just move by

one pep that is price just come down

first to 1.0718 0718

that's already sellers intent

and then that same candle we are still

on one candle now goes up then it means

that opening range I has been cleared

above the opening price is the open

range high according to this logic even

if it is by a pipet

a pipet simply means maybe this is

1.0719 0719

2

and price goes up to 1.07 07

1 9

5

Price has already moved by a pipet. That

is not equal high. That is not equal

low. Equal equal low will be exactly

same price in terms of even the pipet.

The last figure is a pipet is a pipet

reading. So this one is saying exactly

the opening price is its own reference.

So if price go lower that is price

sellers and control. So their cycle will

be they go low inside the same candle

they go high. So which means

automatically the low of that candle is

the RT open range target for this

particular logic because the same candle

has made two moves already

price goes low

price goes up.

All right. So automatically if the next

candle now comes and ra the low of the

opening candle it is opening ring target

met already according to this particular

logic.

So this particular logic

covers under it is where we find our

inside bar our outside bar. So you don't

need to even separate your outside bar

your inside bar. The major thing is is

it this logic that you are using. If it

is this logic you are using, it doesn't

matter either price open as outside bar

or inside bar. What you are reading is

with reference to the open price.

All right? And also if you are using

this logic does not mean that the candle

the opening candle must have both the

upper and lower shadow. No, it can have

just one week that is one shadow. That

is we can have just a bullish candle

with upper shadow alone. By the time you

draw the schematic that will just be

open, there is no low and then you have

a high and then you have a close.

In this case

when you read it you see that this your

opening price don't forget is your what

reference point 1.07

one 9. So in this case price just went

straight from the open price. So in this

case this is buyers intent which now

means the low this opening price is the

low. In this case price just went up

straight. So that means that candle did

not make two move. It only made one move

according to this logic. So price just

went up straight. So that is bias. So if

the next candle is now the one that now

come down that will now be opening range

low rated that will not be. So the

difference between this candle and this

one is that for this candle

automatically that candle creates the

open ring target because there is two

move already inside that same candle.

But if your candle do not have only has

one shadow or do not even have any

shadow at all. It means that it's made

only one move. For example, it is just a

bullish candle from the opening price.

It means that it just went up

and then it closes there which means we

just have open sorry we just have open O

and we have close. So it just went up.

In that case it is still exactly the

same as this other candle that has upper

shadow. So price just went up from the

open price clearing the open range high.

All right. And therefore the low of the

candle price coming below the opening

price becomes clearing the open range

low and the swing that is formed after

now becomes the open range target. So

this is the open price the open price

logic is also very simple and very

straightforward.

So in this case all of these guys are

like the major major logic that you can

have. These are the major logics that we

have. Now

our next logic

that we have

they have what? They have

some B

in them. The next series of logic have

some B in them. And that is why I will

advise you pick any of these. If I will

advise you to pick any, I advise you to

pick either of CRL

or OPL

because those two

are never affected by any other factor.

Those

two are binary.

They don't have any too much but inside

of them. Oh hell do not also have but

this particular guy has bought with

reference to CRL. So the reason why the

other ones that we will discuss have

bought in them is because when we get to

practicals on liquidity, we already

understand that we are always

referencing

our logic with reference to a passive.

And even if we are not referencing with

references to a passive and aggressor,

the truth is the other logic does not

always happen. They don't always happen.

And that is why I would say stick to the

ones that you know that 100% of the time

they will not give you issue. And then

the final rule that will make all of

them objective you now link whatever you

pick you link it to them and that will

create co in all that we do. So what is

the other logic? The other logic is the

logic of gap.

The logic of GAP says that

if you are using for example, so it is a

sub logic, if you are using the CRL for

example, the closing range logic for

example or the CO for example, this gap

logic says that when

we have the open candle. Let's say the

closing candle here, let's say it's a

bullish candle and the open candle is a

bearish candle. Now the bearish candle

ideally we expect price to open right

beside the closing price, right? That is

where the next candle is. Gap simply

means if there's a difference between

opening price and closing price. If the

difference between opening price and

closing price is zero, then there is no

gap. If their difference is not zero,

then there is a gap. So this logic says

that let's say the next candle is a

bearish candle. All right? And it opens

at the top here. So it's a bearish

candle. Bearish candle opens at the top

right here. And this is the closing

candle price.

It means that there was initially a gap.

Now this gap filled itself immediately

by the same candle that created in the

sense that the gap between them was

between here and here initially that

this was the gap

but here now in this particular scenario

it gapped up and it filled up the gap

immediately on the time frame where you

are watching it. We say that we can

assume that this gap does not exist.

because it filled itself immediately. We

can assume on the time frame but does

that mean that that gap did not exist on

the corresponding lower time frame? That

gap exist on the corresponding lower

time frame. So let's say this is on 1

hour time frame for example and

logically I want to assume that this gap

does not exist but on one minute time

frame price truly gap and the 1 minute

candle did not fill that gap immediately

or even if I see this gap on 1 minute

time frame on a certain seconds time

frame maybe 5 seconds time frame price

actually gapped up truly and the 5

seconds opening candle did not fill that

gap immediately

which means referentially

this gap might or might not exist.

Logically,

it has a might in it. This gap might or

might not truly exist. And that is the

reason why the logic that binds

everything

which we will discuss that is the reason

why that logic is very important.

Now what makes this particular other

logic of gap to be something to be

careful about but yet we have to know it

because of the final route that tidy

everything

so that by the time we are implementing

and we are trying to seek balance based

on that rule because that rule is what

align everything that this is a must and

is what makes us know how to switch in

between major logic and sublogic.

Sublogic is a gap logic.

Major logic let's say my major logic is

CL. My sub logic

in order to create agreement

is gap logic. So your sublogic is

something to have at the back of your

mind. Your major logic is what direct

you every time. A gap logic cannot be a

major logic.

Why can it not be a major logic? Because

of the rule that binds everything

together which we will discuss shortly.

our gap logic another reason why it

cannot be is because if I register from

my passive let's say I will register a

passive signal on my passive signal

there is nothing like a fake gap there

there was nothing like a fake gap on my

passive signal there was literally

nothing like that on my passive signal

when I was registering my passive signal

on my aggressor signal

there is now a fake gap at the open or

after the open.

Do you see that in that case there is a

problem

because

what I want to do cannot be true.

Cannot be absolutely true because on my

passive there was no gap. There was no

fake gap. It was a straight up candle

that is very clean and direct.

But on my aggressor there was a fake

gap. So fake gap logic either we will

take this gap as true on the time frame

where we see it or we will take it as

false force. Now depends

solely on our rule of concluding signal

registration. Do not forget number one

thing you are to pick your major logic

that you will use to register your

signal every single time. That is the

number one thing you are to do. Then the

next thing you are to do is to now

implement the sub logics. So the last

sublogics is our what outside bar and I

told you if you are using OPL

generally an OPL person does not need to

consider outside bar 13 point in time

because an OPL is always reading

everything. All right. So what is an

outside bar? An outside bar logic is

saying that we read our outside bar

manually

especially when we find it. Any of this

logic you are using. If you find an

outside bar

jamming your signal, you must read it

manually. For any of the logic that you

are using, you must read it manually.

Don't worry the rule we want to discuss

already bring all of them together.

You must read it manually. So let's say

for example I'm using CRL and this is my

closing candle and the first candle is

an outside bar.

I will read it manually.

Like I said the rule

that we want to initiate already bring

everything to the same. So if this is a

bullish outside bar

then it means that it clear the low of

this first before clearing the high.

So which means

price clear my low and clear my high and

therefore the swing low formed is my RT.

I must read my outside bar manually

either it is later later that I find it

that is let's say I uh this is my

closing candle and after opening price

has cleared the high clear the low

uh price is here and then an outside

banner coming somewhere around here

jamming this

I will read it manually

that is price clear the high clear the

low. The question now is, is this a

bullish? If is a bullish candle, it

means that price still cleared the low

first and then price met target. But if

my outside buy is a bearish candle, it

means that price already clear my high,

clear my low.

Then if this is a bearish candle, it

means that price met my target,

opening range target.

That is if my outside is a is a is a

bearish candle and then it flip. If it's

a bullish candle, price only met my open

range target, right? But it's a bearish

candle, price flip to sellers. So which

means from here it is sellers.

So all of these are sub logic

major logic sub logic. But for someone

using an OPL you are always reading this

for gap only when necessary that is when

we use gap that is from the rule we will

discuss after you have gone to multiple

time frame you still couldn't get

opposite participants. So you can now

check okay was there a gap at the

aggressor or at the passive that will

make the opposite participants to appear

first before continuation of story.

It is until then you implement your gap.

Apart from then make your major logic

your consistent approach based on the

time frame you are using to determine

are you to switch time frame or not to

switch time frame to register your

passive and your aggressor.

All right and that is that. Okay. So the

next thing we want to do now is now to

discuss our role from daily participants

above. I told you it is binary either

daily or weekly

or monthly

or yearly.

So this is binary.

All right.

This is binary. A day closes before

another day opens.

A previous week closes before a new week

opens. A previous month closes before a

new month opens.

A previous year closes before a new year

opens.

Okay. What then is the rule? The rule

says to register

to register a participant signal

a participant signal on a defined logic.

We have already discussed logic on any

time frame.

of reference that you want to use. Be 15

minutes, 5 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hour on

any time frame of reference.

On any time frame of reference

semicolon,

the new

day

signal must first open as an opposite

signal to what the to what the previous

so it can be new day, new week or

whatever. So let me underline that. So

to what the previous

day signal closes

on

such time frame on such time frame this

gives an absolute that is 100%.

This gives an absolute signal

designation to such to such reading.

All right, let's read again. This is the

rule that aligns that everyone must have

at the back of their mind

anytime they want to conclude on signal.

The rule is to register a participant

signal on a defined logic. These are key

words. Number one, defined logic. Are

you using CRL? Are you using OPL?

Whichever defined logic which must be

consistent all through your analysis.

That is the logic you must use all

through on a defined logic on any time

frame. It can be 8 hour, it can be 4

hour, I don't care on any time frame of

reference.

The new say day in this case we are

using daily signal that is I want to

register the present day. What is the

signal for the present day must first

open as an opposite signal toward the

previous day must

first that is the first thing it must

show us that is absorption first as what

as an opposite signal I already emphas

in capital letter must first open as an

opposite signal to what the previous day

signal closes as on such time frame.

Now

I don't need to verify the previous day

signal in as much the previous day is on

my defined logic on that time frame.

Let's say I'm using CR help.

All right. And

this was the previous day. the day pre

the previous day let's say my previous

day cleared the RL

and it keeps selling so I'm using CRL

that is my previous day and it closes

somewhere around there no problem the

major thing here is that my previous day

closes at sellers dominant D minus

and now I now have the last candle on

the time frame of reference

so on this time frame let's say this

time frame now is 2 hour time frame. I

even want to pick a a time frame we

don't usually use on this time frame of

reference. This is 2 hour time frame in

as much. The first thing here is that on

a defined logic, what is my defined

logic? CL

closing range logic. That's what I'm

using right.

So on my 2our time frame, it is telling

me that my new day, this is now my new

day.

For me to register that signal as true,

for me to assign true, there are two

things we can assign to a signal. It is

always binary. Either we assign it as

true or as false. Zero and one. These

are basics. We have programmers here.

The basics of your computing

of your algorithm is usually zero and

one. True or false. That is your input

garbage in garbage out.

All right. Is it inversion or not? Logic

gate.

Okay. So majorly this guy here D minus

daily participants

if on this my time frame based on my

defined logic underline defined logic in

your notebook when you are watching this

video. Very important. All right. Before

you start asking question and we now go

to the chat, we now see that you did not

use a defined logic.

Underline def. That's why I used almost

the 40 minutes to first talk about

logic.

So based on this particular time frame

or my defined logic

if this time frame show me first my

define logic is CR right. If this time

show me first that the opening range I

is cleared first that is bias

that is it open first as opposite

signal. What is the signal that the

previous day closes as sell as D minus

this guy now opens as buyers D plus

then whatever conclusion this time frame

gives me is absolutely correct.

No other time frame that I go to I must

get this thing. Any other time frame I

go to on that defined logic trust me it

is that same final thing that this time

frame give me that I will get that is

after it open as D plus let's say price

now clear the low also on a defined

logic and price met the target and then

finally this guy now flip to D minus

here it's now flip to D minus

conclusively

The signal

of this my aggressor is D minus on any

time frame in as you use this logic. Go

and check any other time frame. This

will be true.

Go and check any other time frame. This

will be what? This will be true.

This will be valid

to register a participant signal on a

defined logic

on any time frame of reference 15

minutes, 1 hour, 8 hour, 4 hour

based on divine logic. Is it oh

logic you want to use?

Is it open price logic? OPL you want to

use any logic at all.

My final conclusion

is that I will have D minus

and this is the true signal of this

aggressor. But does that make the signal

of the passive to automatically be

absolutely correct? No. But for my

aggressor, I don't need the signal of my

passive to be correct. No, that's not

what I'm referencing to. I'm referencing

to this time frame. What is it show me

on a defined logic for my aggressor D

minus is my aggressor

in as much first open as opposite

signal

on a defined logic to what the previous

day closes as. D minus is this my

aggressor and that is exactly what I

will register to register my passive to

now know maybe my passive is correct or

not. I might not even use this this time

frame might not even be correct

for my to register my passive. In that

case I will go to another time frame.

But you see that my aggressor it is

conclusive. That is what the rule is

saying.

Conclusively my aggressor is correct. It

is D minus. Anywhere else you want to

check it based on a defined logic D

minus. If another person is using OP

hell trust me that person will also get

D minus. That person will also get D

minus.

So far the person bind his logic

within the frame of this theory.

So now on this time frame let's say that

the day before this previous day closes

as D minus

and this guy also still say D minus. It

simply means that on this time frame it

does not mean the time frame is wrong

for the passive. No, don't get it wrong.

It doesn't mean the D minus is show is

wrong. No,

it is to assign truth

you are. We want to assign true or false

to cancel every form of ambiguity to

cancel every form of noise to cancel

every form of uh incoherence

is why we are binding every logic you

are using we are binding it under this

theory. It doesn't mean that the D minus

that this guy writes here is wrong.

If I'm to ask you in an exam maybe a

quiz just a fast quiz in the group and I

said that on this particular time frame

if I ask you that

based on CR logic a previous day closes

as D minus and the new day opens

also as D minus.

I now say which of these

is true?

Number one on that time frame the

present signal is wrong.

Number two on that time frame the

present signal is correct.

And I'll say option C on that time frame

the present signal is inconclusive.

Which of those theory? Okay. Then I now

say option option D all of the above is

true.

Which which option will you pick?

Option C. Inconclusive.

So the signal on that time frame is

inconclusive

which means it doesn't make it false

neither does it make it true.

So that is why I said that in as much is

on a defined logic the D minus that time

frame is showing you is still what you

will use to establish this new signal we

we established here it is still that

same D minus that that one show you as

it is on CR logic on a defined logic

it's still that D minus

because it doesn't matter if it is true

or not true what matters is it is do to

register the new signal.

So this new signal is conclusive

is both conclusive and true.

But for this particular signal D minus

it is inconclusive.

Inconclusive that is the only

characteristics it has which means it

can be true or might not be true.

You see how I'm shouting at the top of

my voice

just to ensure everyone is on the same

page because I don't want anything like

you are not having different bias or

different perspective on natural no it

shouldn't be that way then that means we

are not doing the right thing.

Okay. So why is a gap now sublogic? A

gap is sublogic because in this case

even on this time frame if it was that

the open candle gap up first but filled

itself immediately so far the defined

logic I'm using is CRL that guy opened

above the high of the closing candle

in this case I will not use the pseudo

or fake gap rule I will follow the story

first as deep loss because the price

truly gapped up. It truly gapped up. Now

at the same time, let's say what I need

on this time frame, I want to tell you

now, I'm going deeply now into sub

logic. Let's say on this same time frame

I saw a gap that is fake that feel

itself immediately and what I need price

to open first ass is D minus

and it is if I read my sub logic as a

fake gap that is the only reason I can

maybe the previous day was D plus I need

D minus first if I read my fake gap as

truly fake gap is the only way I can get

D minus maybe I've gone through

different time frame

that is when I can now introduce my

sublogic.

I hope that makes sense. In that case, I

will now reach that gap as truly fake in

order to be able to register first my D

minus before continuation of the story.

That is what will let me know it is

still this rule that lets me know if

that gap I should assign it as real or

as fake.

I hope that makes sense. All right. So

but let's first let's focus on the major

logics. This is our major logics.

This is what must happen. So

conclusively our D minus is true as

initially analyzed. If this was D minus

and this opening as D plus. So

conclusively our D minus here is true.

It is conclusive and it is true. That is

the characteristics of it. But for this

inconclusive but necessarily not false

does not mean that it is false neither

does it mean that it is true on that

time frame. So which means if I now need

to register for this passive if not this

one show me D minus D minus all I need

to do is just see can I introduce a

sublogic

if there is no sublogic to introduce on

this same time frame then can I go to

another time frame. So in that case I

just go to another time frame where I

can have opposite participants

in reference then to conclusively decide

what we have here which does not

influence in any way what I initially

register here.

I hope that makes sense. So majorly that

is our signal. So me going to another

time frame to go and now validate the

signal at the passive here does not in

any way affect

what I have as the aggressor because I

already label that as conclusive. You

know what something means to be

conclusive? It means that it is absolute

and I register it as true.

If it's conclusive then it is true.

A theory is falsifiable

until conclusive

is conclusive that if you try to walk on

the hair you will fall down. So in that

case that is that has moved from

hypothesis

to theory and to now something that is

generally true. You as a solid matter,

it is conclusive that if you try to walk

on here, you want to replicate Chinese

movie that you will fall and you will

meet yourself where it is not good. That

is conclusive and it is true. I hope

that makes sense. And trust me, God is

not a magician.

So that that is that is the reality.

All right? So whatever is conclusive

is also true.

Okay. So this guy here is conclusive and

is true.

And this is the rule that binds every

logic any other person among us can

decide to use.

All right. This is the reality.

Okay. So that's that and in the next

signal practical class we'll be looking

at live

examples.

All right

we'll be looking at live examples.

All right guys you guys have seen the

beauty and importance of opposition

rule. You guys have now come to

understand your closing ring logic. Why

your close open logic might not really

you know be something we go for when we

are using a position rule. Why your open

price logic might not be effective for

daily participants and above. So these

are things you guys have seen and now I

believe everyone that watch this video

can now use opposition rule to you know

make better decisions when it comes to

registering their participants signals

effectively. And of course, like I said,

my next video will be on the quadrant

through video. And till then, I'll see

you guys.